DOCSLIB.ORG

Remilitarising the Byzantine Imperial Image: a Study of Numismatic Evidence and Other Visual Media 1042-1453

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Remilitarising the Byzantine Imperial Image: a Study of Numismatic Evidence and Other Visual Media 1042-1453 View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Birmingham Research Archive, E-theses Repository REMILITARISING THE BYZANTINE IMPERIAL IMAGE: A STUDY OF NUMISMATIC EVIDENCE AND OTHER VISUAL MEDIA 1042-1453 by MICHAEL STEPHEN SAXBY A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham March 2017 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract The messages in the imagery on Byzantine coins, although often neglected by scholars, were a key means of projecting imperial power. Emperors could project power via dress, ceremonial, and displays, but these methods would not have reached all subjects. Byzantine coins had the advantage of reaching all subjects, as the Byzantine economy was fundamentally monetized. Military symbols (figures, dress, and weapons), whose study has been rather overlooked, formed an important part of this imagery. Whilst military symbols disappeared from Byzantine coins in the early eighth century, and were absent for some three centuries, they were reintroduced in the mid-eleventh century and appeared until 1394/5. Their importance is indicated by the fact that military types comprised over half the overall total of types for some emperors. This study examines military symbols on Byzantine coins from the eleventh to the fourteenth centuries, and notes also imperial representations in other media. The numismatic sources for this study are the collections in the Barber Institute of Fine Arts, and Dumbarton Oaks. The general conclusions are that military symbols were used most frequently from 1204 to 1261, less frequently from 1261 to 1394/5, and least frequently from 1042 to 1204. The variety of military saints portrayed increased at first, but declined in the fourteenth century, until only St Demetrios remained, but in the highest status: riding with the emperor. ii Dedicated to Dianne Saxby in gratitude iii Acknowledgements I wish to record my sincere thanks to my supervisor Dr Ruth Macrides for her unstinting kindnss, help and guidance and for enabling me to deepen my understanding of the Byzantine world. I am very grateful to the following persons for their help: Dr Eurydice Georganteli, for all her work as my supervisor in the early stages of this thesis. Professor Dimiter Angelov and Professor Leslie Brubaker for stimulating discussions on specific topics. I am very grateful to the following for corresponding with me and for guiding me to much valuable information: Professor Anthony Kaldellis. Dr Cécile Morrisson. Dr Pagona Papadopoulou. Professor Vassiliki Penna. Dr Jonathan Shea. I am very grateful to the following for assistance in specific areas: Mrs Joni Joseph (Dumbarton Oaks) and Dr Maria Vrij (Barber Institute of Fine Arts) for much help in supplying illustrations. The staff of several University of Birmingham Libraries: Barber Institute of Fine Arts, Cadbury Research Library, and Main Library. I record with great gratitude the support and help over many years of my wife Dianne, and dedicate this thesis to her. iv Contents Volume 1 1. Themes of Imperial Power and their Projection Introduction 1 The aims of coin design: an example of propaganda? 5 The need for projection of imperial themes of power 14 The role of coin design in projecting imperial themes of power 24 The role of dress, ceremonial and displays in projecting imperial themes of power 31 Conclusions 40 2. Military Symbols on Byzantine Coins from 1042 to 1425 Methods of study 42 The mounted emperor 43 The military saints and the Archangel Michael 48 Military items of dress 54 Protection for other body parts 58 Weapons of the emperor and the warrior saints 70 Conclusions 82 3. Reintroduction and Development of Military Symbolism on Coins 1042 to 1143 Reintroduction and development of military symbolism on coins 1042 84 to 1143 Conclusions 100 Development of military symbols 101 Further development of military symbols 119 Conclusions 131 v 4. Development of Military Symbolism on Coins 1143 to 1204 Development of military symbolism on coins 1143 to 1204 132 Comparative analysis of military types 1042 to 1204 165 Conclusions 170 5. Military Symbolism on Coins 1204 to 1261 Introduction 173 The Latin imitative coinage 179 Coin issues with military symbolism from the empire of Nicaea 188 Conclusions 210 Coin issues with military symbolism from Thessaloniki 211 Conclusions 237 Coin issues with military symbolism from Epeiros 237 Conclusions 243 Portraits of the rulers of the successor states in other media 243 Conclusions 244 6. Military Symbolism on Coins 1261 to 1425 Introduction: mints and proportions of military types 247 Military symbolism on coins from the thirteenth to mid-fourteenth centuries 250 Conclusions 323 Military symbolism on coins from the mid-fourteenth to the late fourteenth century 324 Imperial portraits in other media 1261-1453 347 Conclusions 349 Conclusions 351 Volume 2 Illustrations Bibliography: primary sources Bibliography: secondary sources vi List of Illustrations Figure Facing Page 1. Silver tetradrachm of Philip II (359-336 BC) 1 2. Orich sestertius of Trajan (AD 98-117) 1 3. Gold solidus of Justin II (565-78) 1 4. Gold solidus of Anastasios (491-518) 2 5. Bronze coin of Arcadios (383-408) 2 6. Silver ceremonial coin of Leo III (717-41) 2 7. Class 13 copper trachy of Andronikos III (1328-41) 3 8. Class 12 copper trachy of Andronikos III (1328-41) 3 9. Class 14 copper trachy of Andronikos III (1328-41) 3 10. Aspron trachy nomisma in electrum of John II (1118-43) 4 11. Class IV gold histamenon of Constantine IX (1042-55) 4 12. Silver miliaresion of Constantine IX (1042-55) 4 13. Portrait of Basil II (976-1025) 5 14. The Barberini Ivory, c. 6th century 6 15. Class I gold histamenon of Isaac I (1057-59) 7 16. Class II gold histamenon of Isaac I (1057-59) 7 17. Silver miliaresion of Michael VII (1071-78) 7 18. Class II miliaresion in billon of Nikephoros (1078-81) 8 19. Aspron trachy nomisma in silver of Michael VIII (1259-82) 8 20. Histamenon in billon of Alexios I (1081-1118) 9 21. Type B half terarteron noummion in copper of John II (1118-43) 9 22. Aspron trachy nomisma in electrum of Manuel I (1143-80) 9 23. Type B tetarteron noummion in bronze of Andronikos I (1183-85) 10 24. Gold nomisma hyperpyron of Isaac II (1185-95) 10 25. Bronze terarteron noummion of Alexios III (1195-1204) 10 26. Type B aspron trachy nomisma in electrum of Theodore I (1208-21) 11 27. Type B aspron trachy nomisma in billon of John III (1221-54) 11 28. Type Q aspron trachy nomisma in billon of John III (1221-54) 11 vii 29. Type A tetarteron noummion in bronze of John III (1221-54) 12 30. Type C tetarteron noummion in bronze of John III (1221-54) 12 31. Type C aspron trachy nomisma in billon of Theodore II (1254-58) 12 32. Type D aspron trachy nomisma in billon of Theodore II (1254-58) 13 33. Type C aspron trachy nomisma in electrum of Theodore Angelos (1225/7-30) 13 34. Type C aspron trachy nomisma in billon of Theodore Angelos (1225/7-30) 13 35. Type B aspron trachy nomisma in silver of Theodore Angelos (1225/7-30) 14 36. Type F aspron trachy nomisma in billon of of Theodore Angelos (1225/7-30) 14 37. Variety B tetarteron noummion in bronze of Theodore Angelos (1225/7-30) 15 38. Type B aspron trachy nomisma in silver of Manuel Komnenos Doukas (1230-37) 15 39. Type A aspron trachy nomisma in billon of Manuel Komnenos Doukas (1230-37) 15 40. Type C aspron trachy nomisma in billon of Manuel Komnenos Doukas (1230-37) 16 41. Type B aspron trachy nomisma in billon of John Komnenos Doukas (1237-42) 16 42. Aspron trachy nomisma in billon of Demetrios Komnenos Doukas (1244-46) 16 43. Type G aspron trachy nomisma in billon of Manuel Komnenos Doukas (1230-37) 17 44. Type Q aspron trachy nomisma in billon of John Komnenos Doukas (1237-42) 17 45. Type D aspron trachy nomisma in billon of John III (1246-54) 18 46. Type I aspron trachy nomisma in billon of John III (1246-54) 18 47. Aspron trachy nomisma in billon of Theodore II (1254-58) 19 48. Type 25 copper trachy of Michael VIII (1259-82) 19 viii 49. Steatite icon with three military saints (12th century) 20 50. Type III gold hyperpyron of Michael VIII (1259-82) 21 51. Type 8 copper trachy of Michael VIII (1259-82) 21 52. Type 9 copper trachy of Michael VIII (1259-82) 21 53. Type 11 copper trachy of Michael VIII (1259-82) 22 54. Type 19 copper trachy of Michael VIII (1259-82) 22 55. Type 38 copper trachy of Michael VIII (1259-82) 22 56. Type 43 copper trachy of Michael VIII (1259-82) 23 57. Type 53 copper trachy of Michael VIII (1259-82) 23 58. Class 2 copper trachy of Andronikos II (1282-1328) 24 59. Class 2 copper trachy of Andronikos II (1282-1328 ) 24 60.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Story of the Byzantine Empire
    THE STO RY O F T HE NATIO NS L LU T T E E R VO L . I z M o I S A . P , R D , T H E E AR L I E R VO L UM E S A R E f I N E F R E E B P o AS A . SO T H STO R Y O G E C . y r . I . HARR R F R E B TH U ILM A N T HE STO Y O O M . y A R R G EW B P f A K O S E R F T HE S . o S . M T HE ST O Y O J y r . J . H R B Z N R O F DE . A R A coz I T HE ST O Y C HA L A . y . — R F E R N . B S B ING O U L THE ST O Y O G MA Y y . AR G D F N W B P f H B YE S E N o . H . O T HE ST O R Y O O R A Y . y r N E n E B . E . a d S SA H T HE ST O R Y O F SP A I . y U N AL N B P R of. A . VAM B Y T HE STO R Y O F H U GA R Y . y r E ST R O F E B P of L E TH E O Y C A RT H A G .
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Roman Memory in the Age of Justinian DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the D
    The Politics of Roman Memory in the Age of Justinian DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Marion Woodrow Kruse, III Graduate Program in Greek and Latin The Ohio State University 2015 Dissertation Committee: Anthony Kaldellis, Advisor; Benjamin Acosta-Hughes; Nathan Rosenstein Copyright by Marion Woodrow Kruse, III 2015 ABSTRACT This dissertation explores the use of Roman historical memory from the late fifth century through the middle of the sixth century AD. The collapse of Roman government in the western Roman empire in the late fifth century inspired a crisis of identity and political messaging in the eastern Roman empire of the same period. I argue that the Romans of the eastern empire, in particular those who lived in Constantinople and worked in or around the imperial administration, responded to the challenge posed by the loss of Rome by rewriting the history of the Roman empire. The new historical narratives that arose during this period were initially concerned with Roman identity and fixated on urban space (in particular the cities of Rome and Constantinople) and Roman mythistory. By the sixth century, however, the debate over Roman history had begun to infuse all levels of Roman political discourse and became a major component of the emperor Justinian’s imperial messaging and propaganda, especially in his Novels. The imperial history proposed by the Novels was aggressivley challenged by other writers of the period, creating a clear historical and political conflict over the role and import of Roman history as a model or justification for Roman politics in the sixth century.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Michael and Attis
    St. Michael and Attis Cyril MANGO Δελτίον XAE 12 (1984), Περίοδος Δ'. Στην εκατονταετηρίδα της Χριστιανικής Αρχαιολογικής Εταιρείας (1884-1984)• Σελ. 39-62 ΑΘΗΝΑ 1986 ST. MICHAEL AND ATTIS Twenty years ago, when I was working on the apse mosaics of St. Sophia at Constantinople, I had ample opportunity to contemplate what is surely one of the most beautiful works of Byzantine art, I mean the image of the archangel Gabriel, who stands next to the enthroned Theotokos (Fig. 1). Gabriel is dressed in court costume; indeed, one can affirm that his costume is imperial, since he is wearing red buskins and holding a globe, the symbol of universal dominion. Yet neither the Bible nor orthodox doctrine as defined by the Fathers provides any justification for portraying an archangel in this guise; no matter how great was his dignity in heaven, he remained a minister and a messenger1. Only God could be described as the equivalent of the emperor. How was it then that Byzantine art, which showed extreme reluctance to give to Christ, the pambasileus, any visible attributes of royalty other than the throne, granted these very attributes to archangels, who had no claim to them? An enquiry I undertook at the time (and left unpublished) suggested the following conclusions: 1. The Byzantines themselves, I mean the medieval Byzantines, could offer no reasonable explanation of the iconography of archangels and seemed to be unaware of its meaning. On the subject of the globe I found only two texts. One was an unedited opuscule by Michael Psellos, who, quite absurdly, considered it to denote the angels' rapidity of movement; "for", he says, "the sphere is such an object that, touching as it does only a tiny portion of the ground, is able in less than an instant to travel in any direction"2.
    [Show full text]
  • SINCONA Auction 17 312.Pdf
    Antike Münzen & Siegel Auktion 17 21. Mai 2014 Zürich Hotel Savoy-Baur en Ville Poststrasse 12 CH-8001 Zürich Unter Aufsicht des Stadtammannamtes Zürich SINCONA AG Uraniastrasse 11 CH-8001 Zürich Tel. +41-44-215 10 90 Fax +41-44-215 10 99 © 2014 SINCONA AG, Zürich –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Auktionsbedingungen Für die SINCONA Auktion 17 gelten folgende Versteigerungsbedingun- Für staatlich geprägte Goldmünzen und das darauf anfallende Auf- gen, welche durch die Abgabe eines schriftlichen, elektronischen, münd- geld wird keine Mehrwertsteuer erhoben. lichen oder telefonischen Gebotes vollumfänglich anerkannt werden: Die Mehrwertsteuer entfällt, sofern die Auktionslose durch den Ver- 1. Die Versteigerung erfolgt freiwillig und öffentlich im Namen der steigerer ins Ausland spediert werden. Käufern mit Wohnsitz aus- SINCONA AG für Rechnung des oder der ungenannt bleibenden serhalb der Schweiz, welchen die ersteigerten Auktionslose in Zürich Einlieferer. ausgehändigt werden, wird die Mehrwertsteuer vorerst in Rechnung gestellt, jedoch nach Vorliegen der definitiven Veranlagungsverfü- 2. Der SINCONA AG (im Folgenden "Versteigerer" genannt) unbe- gung des Schweizer Zolls vom Versteigerer vollumfänglich zurück- kannte Bieter sind gebeten, sich vor der Auktion zu legitimieren. erstattet. Ferner behält sich der Versteigerer vor, nach freiem Ermessen und ohne Angabe von Gründen Personen den Zutritt zu den Auktions- 8. Die Auktionsrechnung ist sofort nach Erhalt, spätestens aber innert räumlichkeiten zu untersagen. 10 Tagen nach Auktionsende zu bezahlen. Nach Ablauf der Zah- lungsfrist fällt der Käufer automatisch in Zahlungsverzug und der Der Versteigerer ist mit Zustimmung der Auktionsaufsicht berech- Versteigerer ist berechtigt, Zinsen in der Höhe von 10% p.a. zu ver- tigt, von der im Katalog vorgesehenen Reihenfolge abzuweichen und langen. Bei Zahlungsverzug des Käufers oder bei Verweigerung der Nummern zu vereinigen.
    [Show full text]
  • BYZANTINE CAMEOS and the AESTHETICS of the ICON By
    BYZANTINE CAMEOS AND THE AESTHETICS OF THE ICON by James A. Magruder, III A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland March 2014 © 2014 James A. Magruder, III All rights reserved Abstract Byzantine icons have attracted artists and art historians to what they saw as the flat style of large painted panels. They tend to understand this flatness as a repudiation of the Classical priority to represent Nature and an affirmation of otherworldly spirituality. However, many extant sacred portraits from the Byzantine period were executed in relief in precious materials, such as gemstones, ivory or gold. Byzantine writers describe contemporary icons as lifelike, sometimes even coming to life with divine power. The question is what Byzantine Christians hoped to represent by crafting small icons in precious materials, specifically cameos. The dissertation catalogs and analyzes Byzantine cameos from the end of Iconoclasm (843) until the fall of Constantinople (1453). They have not received comprehensive treatment before, but since they represent saints in iconic poses, they provide a good corpus of icons comparable to icons in other media. Their durability and the difficulty of reworking them also makes them a particularly faithful record of Byzantine priorities regarding the icon as a genre. In addition, the dissertation surveys theological texts that comment on or illustrate stone to understand what role the materiality of Byzantine cameos played in choosing stone relief for icons. Finally, it examines Byzantine epigrams written about or for icons to define the terms that shaped icon production.
    [Show full text]
  • Constantinople As Center and Crossroad
    Constantinople as Center and Crossroad Edited by Olof Heilo and Ingela Nilsson SWEDISH RESEARCH INSTITUTE IN ISTANBUL TRANSACTIONS, VOL. 23 Table of Contents Acknowledgments ......................................................................... 7 OLOF HEILO & INGELA NILSSON WITH RAGNAR HEDLUND Constantinople as Crossroad: Some introductory remarks ........................................................... 9 RAGNAR HEDLUND Byzantion, Zeuxippos, and Constantinople: The emergence of an imperial city .............................................. 20 GRIGORI SIMEONOV Crossing the Straits in the Search for a Cure: Travelling to Constantinople in the Miracles of its healer saints .......................................................... 34 FEDIR ANDROSHCHUK When and How Were Byzantine Miliaresia Brought to Scandinavia? Constantinople and the dissemination of silver coinage outside the empire ............................................. 55 ANNALINDEN WELLER Mediating the Eastern Frontier: Classical models of warfare in the work of Nikephoros Ouranos ............................................ 89 CLAUDIA RAPP A Medieval Cosmopolis: Constantinople and its foreigners .............................................. 100 MABI ANGAR Disturbed Orders: Architectural representations in Saint Mary Peribleptos as seen by Ruy González de Clavijo ........................................... 116 ISABEL KIMMELFIELD Argyropolis: A diachronic approach to the study of Constantinople’s suburbs ................................... 142 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS MILOŠ
    [Show full text]
  • The Costume of Byzantine Emperors and Empresses ’
    Shaw, C. (2011) ‘The Costume of Byzantine Emperors and Empresses ’ Rosetta 9.5: 55-59. http://www.rosetta.bham.ac.uk/colloquium2011/shaw_costume.pdf http://www.rosetta.bham.ac.uk/colloquium2011/shaw_costume.pdf The Costume of the Byzantine Emperors and Empresses Carol Shaw PhD candidate, 4th year (part-time) University of Birmingham, College of Arts and Law [email protected] The Costume of the Byzantine Emperors and Empresses The first Roman emperors were all members of the senate and continued to belong to it throughout their reigns.1 All the members of the senate including the emperor wore tunics and togas decorated with a wide purple band, the latus clavus, and special footwear.2 During the period of instability in the early third century several emperors were selected by the army.3 Initially this shift in power did not affect court ceremony and dress; but slowly both began to change. Court ceremony became more formal and emperors distanced themselves even from senators.4 During the late third century, Diocletian introduced the new court ceremony of the adoration of the purple; according to Aurelius Victor, the emperor also wore richly brocaded purple robes, silks and jeweled sandals.5 Diocletian’s abdication ceremony illustrates that court ceremony and dress often remained very simple. The only garment closely associated with imperial power at this time was the emperor’s purple robes. In his On the Deaths of the Persecutors, Lactantius records that in AD 305 when Diocletian abdicated, the ceremony consisted of the emperor standing under a statue of his patron deity, 1 Under the law the Lex Ovinia (enacted by 318 BC), censors selected each senator according to certain criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Byzantine Numismatics in the Light of Franz Füeg's Corpora Of
    This is a repository copy of Middle Byzantine Numismatics in the Light of Franz Füeg’s Corpora of Nomismata. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/124522/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Jarrett, J orcid.org/0000-0002-0433-5233 (2018) Middle Byzantine Numismatics in the Light of Franz Füeg’s Corpora of Nomismata. Numismatic Chronicle, 177. pp. 514-535. ISSN 0078-2696 © 2017 The Author. This is an author produced version of a paper accepted for publication in Numismatic Chronicle. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ REVIEW ARTICLE Middle Byzantine Numismatics in the Light of Franz Füeg’s Corpora of Nomismata* JONATHAN JARRETT FRANZ FÜEG, Corpus of the Nomismata from Anastasius II to John I in Constantinople 713–976: Structure of the Issues; Corpus of Coin Finds; Contribution to the Iconographic and Monetary History, trans.
    [Show full text]
  • Reno Cartwheel February 2021
    Page 1 Reno Cartwheel February 2021 Next Meeting: 2020 NA &CT, MA, MD, SC Innovation $1, Bush $1 and 2019S .25 sets here. Tuskegee .25 ordered. MARCH MAYBE??!! F ebruary 19-21, Reno Coin Show, Silver Legacy , Admit: $3, $1 with registration, 10-6 Friday and Saturday, 10-4 on Sunday.(COVID-19 restrictions: first hour maximum of 50 people in the room). Additional hours are $1 when the show is at maximum capacity. PCGS submissions will be accepted. John Ward 559 967-8067 Info www. coinzip.com/Reno-Coin-Show-Silver-Legacy February 23 6:30PM Board Meeting only Dennys, 205, Nugett Ave, Sparks After the Last Cancelled Meeting Reno Coin Show and Board meeting this month. Ordered Tuskegee airmen coin, last S set of all five 2013-2019 quarters in case $5 American the Beautiful .25. Got Kansas butterfly National Park Quarters PDS .50 .25, Bush $1, Hubble $1, and last 2020 Innovation, Native American $1 D P $1.25 Innovation dollar. Call and come by to get any of the new coins if you want. John Ward’s coin New Coins show on, at Silver Legacy February 19-21 Info: The Trump presidential medal with price tripled at 1.5 559 967-8067. Details at CoinZip.com We get a inches for $20 and quadrupled at 3 inch at $160 is back table and will do a raffle. Need help on Friday ordered. I have found a six quarter case to put the S sets 19th. ANA Coin Week April 18-24 Money, Big together for the 2020 and 2021 quarters.
    [Show full text]
  • Syrian Orthodox from the Mosul Area Snelders, B
    Identity and Christian-Muslim interaction : medieval art of the Syrian Orthodox from the Mosul area Snelders, B. Citation Snelders, B. (2010, September 1). Identity and Christian-Muslim interaction : medieval art of the Syrian Orthodox from the Mosul area. Peeters, Leuven. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/15917 Version: Not Applicable (or Unknown) Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the License: Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/15917 Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable). 2. The Syrian Orthodox in their Historical and Artistic Settings 2.1 Northern Mesopotamia and Mosul The blossoming of ‘Syrian Orthodox art’ during the twelfth and thirteenth centuries is mainly attested for Northern Mesopotamia. At the time, Northern Mesopotamia was commonly known as the Jazira (Arabic for ‘island’), a geographic entity encompassing roughly the territory which is located between the Euphrates and Tigris rivers, and lies north of Baghdad and south of Lake Van. 1 In ecclesiastical terms, this region is called Athur (Assyria). 2 Early Islamic historians and geographers distinguished three different districts: Diyar Mudar, Diyar Bakr, and Diyar Rabi cah. Today, these districts correspond more or less to eastern Syria, south-eastern Turkey, and northern Iraq, respectively. Mosul was the capital of the Diyar Rabi cah district, which ‘extended north from Takrit along both banks of the Tigris to the tributary Ba caynatha river a few kilometres north of Jazirat ibn cUmar (modern Cizre) and westwards along the southern slopes of the Tur cAbdin as far as the western limits of the Khabur Basin’.
    [Show full text]
  • Gold Jewellery in Ptolemaic, Roman and Byzantine Egypt. Jack M
    Gold Jewellery in Ptolemaic, Roman and Byzantine Egypt. Jack M. Ogden ABSTRACT This study deals with the gold jewellery made and worn in Egypt during the millennium between Alexander the Great's invasion of Egypt and the Arab conquest. Funerary jewellery is largely ignored as are ornaments in the traditional, older Egyptian styles. The work draws upon a wide variety of evidence, in particular the style, composition and construction of surviving jewellery, the many repre- sentations of jewellery in wear, such as funerary portraits, and the numerous literary references from the papyri and from Classical and early Christian writers. Egypt, during the period considered, has provided a greater wealth of such information than anywhere else in the ancient or medieval world and this allows a broadly based study of jewellery in a single ancient society. The individual chapters deal with a brief historical background; the information available from papyri and other literary sources; the sources, distribution, composition and value of gold; the origins and use of mineral and organic gem materials; the economic and social organisation of the goldsmiths' trade; and the individual jewellery types, their chronology, manufacture and significance. This last section is covered in four chapters which deal respectively with rings, earrings, necklets and pendants, and bracelets and armiets. These nine chapters are followed by a detailed bibliography and a list of the 511 illustrations. Gold Jewellery in Ptolemaic, Roman and Byzantine Egypt. In two volumes Volume 1 - Text. Jack M. Ogden Ph.D. Thesis Universtity of Durham, Department of Oriental Studies. © 1990 The copyright of this thesis rests with the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Coins and Medals Including Renaissance and Later Medals from the Collection of Dr Charles Avery and Byzantine Coins from the Estate of Carroll F
    Coins and Medals including Renaissance and Later Medals from the Collection of Dr Charles Avery and Byzantine Coins from the Estate of Carroll F. Wales (Part I) To be sold by auction at: Sotheby’s, in the Upper Grosvenor Gallery The Aeolian Hall, Bloomfield Place New Bond Street London W1 Days of Sale: Wednesday 11 and Thursday 12 June 2008 10.00 am and 2.00 pm Public viewing: 45 Maddox Street, London W1S 2PE Friday 6 June 10.00 am to 4.30 pm Monday 9 June 10.00 am to 4.30 pm Tuesday 10 June 10.00 am to 4.30 pm Or by previous appointment. Catalogue no. 31 Price £10 Enquiries: James Morton, Tom Eden, Paul Wood, Jeremy Cheek or Stephen Lloyd Cover illustrations: Lot 465 (front); Lot 1075 (back); Lot 515 (inside front and back covers, all at two-thirds actual size) in association with 45 Maddox Street, London W1S 2PE Tel.: +44 (0)20 7493 5344 Fax: +44 (0)20 7495 6325 Email: [email protected] Website: www.mortonandeden.com This auction is conducted by Morton & Eden Ltd. in accordance with our Conditions of Business printed at the back of this catalogue. All questions and comments relating to the operation of this sale or to its content should be addressed to Morton & Eden Ltd. and not to Sotheby’s. Important Information for Buyers All lots are offered subject to Morton & Eden Ltd.’s Conditions of Business and to reserves. Estimates are published as a guide only and are subject to review. The actual hammer price of a lot may well be higher or lower than the range of figures given and there are no fixed “starting prices”.
    [Show full text]