DOCSLIB.ORG

The Story of the Byzantine Empire

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Story of the Byzantine Empire THE STO RY O F T HE NATIO NS L LU T T E E R VO L . I z M o I S A . P , R D , T H E E AR L I E R VO L UM E S A R E f I N E F R E E B P o AS A . SO T H STO R Y O G E C . y r . I . HARR R F R E B TH U ILM A N T HE STO Y O O M . y A R R G EW B P f A K O S E R F T HE S . o S . M T HE ST O Y O J y r . J . H R B Z N R O F DE . A R A coz I T HE ST O Y C HA L A . y . — R F E R N . B S B ING O U L THE ST O Y O G MA Y y . AR G D F N W B P f H B YE S E N o . H . O T HE ST O R Y O O R A Y . y r N E n E B . E . a d S SA H T HE ST O R Y O F SP A I . y U N AL N B P R of. A . VAM B Y T HE STO R Y O F H U GA R Y . y r E ST R O F E B P of L E TH E O Y C A RT H A G . y r . A FR D J . C H UR C H R F T R NS B I N T HE STO Y O HE S A A CE . y A RTH U R G LM A T E STO R O F T HE OO RS IN S P N B ST NL E AN E - P OO L E H Y M A I . y A Y L N S B S EWETT T E T R O F T HE N O R . H H S O Y MA y ARA 0 . J T R F P E A B S W B A M IN . EN T HE S O Y O RSI y G . J R F N YP T R AW B Y EO . INSO N T HE STO Y O A C I ENT E G . G L ’ T ST R O F A E N DER S E P RE B P o f P H A HE O Y L X A M I . y r . I. MA FFY F R B Z A . R AGO Z I THE STO R Y O A SS Y I A . y . N N B H H ST R O F R LA D . on E M I L WL E T E O Y I E y . Y LA SS HE O F T HE O T S B E N B L E T STO R Y G H . y H RY RAD Y B S N - T HE ST O R Y O F T U R K E Y . y TA L E Y L AN E P O O L E T HE STO R O F ED B B O N AN D P E RS B Z A R GO ZIN Y M I A . A YL , IA . y . A T HE ST O R O F E D E A F R N E B GUS TAVE SS ON Y M I V L A C . y MA T HE STO R O F B SU N A L Y M EX I C O . y SA H E T HE STO R O F O N D M E E H L B A S . T O E Y H LL A . y J O RO D R G RS T HE STO R O F P HCE NI IA B G E O GE R AW L INS ON Y C . y R T HE STO R O F T HE A N S T O WN S B E L E N I M M E Y H A . y H Z R N T HE ST O R O F E R B R T N . B P o f L E C C Y A LY I AI y r . A FR D J . H U R H T HE ST O R O F T HE B R B R Y O RS RS B STA N L E AN E - P O LE Y A A C AI . y Y L O T HE ST O R O F R SS B W R M O R FI L L Y U IA . y . T HE ST O R O F T HE E WS N DE R B W D I R E . O SO N Y J U O M y . M RR T HE ST O R O F S CO T N D B O H N A K IN TO S H Y LA . y J M C T HE STO R O F S W T E R N D B R STE A n d r M s . A H . a UG Y I Z LA y D . THE ST O R O F P O RT G L B H E T H . O S S E P E NS Y U A y . M R F or prospectus of th e s e ri es se e e n d o f t h is v olu m e ’ G. P . P T NA S SO N S N E W O R AN D O ND U M , Y K L O N T SOP . I NT E RI O R O F S . HIA Wa ne s y . Vucinic a!”$ torg 05 ibt gfiafi mxs THE STO RY O F THE BYZANTINE EMPIRE w AN c. M A F A c O . S . M , . , . ' E LLO W OF A L L S O U LS CO L L E G E O X O A UT H O R m W A R w- usx T u E F . F RD ; " “ ” KI N -M KE T H A O F W A R IN T H E c s G R E RT m o o n A m ETC . A . N E W V O Q Y Gills $101 1; nfl thz Nations THE STO RY O F THE BYZANTINE EMPIRE W AN M A F A C . C . O . S . M , . , . NEW YO R K T A ’ G . U N S N P . P M SO S O N N T F I S E R U N WIN L D O : . H 1 89 2 C O P R T 1 8 2 Y IGH , 9 ’ B Y P P UT N S O NS G . AM S ' ’ E n tered a t S ta tzon ers H a ll B Y T F S ER NW N . I H U I t h e knickerb och er pr ess mew pork PREFAC E. “ FIFTY years ago the word By zan tin e was used s n on m o as a y y for all that was c rrupt and decadent , and the tale of the E ast - Roman E mpire was dis mi ss ed by modern hi s to rian s as depressing and o o o m not nou s . The great Gibb n had branded the succe ss ors o f Ju s tin ian and Heracliu s as a s eries of s n o viciou weaklings , and for several generations one o dared to c ntradict him . Two bo ok s have served to undeceive the Engl i s h of reader , the monu mental work Finlay , pub lished i n 1 8 6 s of 5 , and the more modern volu me M r . Bury, i n 1 8 8 . S which appeared 9 ince they have written , s o the Byzantine no l nger need an apologist , an d the great work of the Ea st - R o man Empire i n hold ing S o back the aracen , and i n keeping al ive thr ughout s the Dark Age the lamp of learning, is beginn ing to be realized . The writer of thi s bo ok h as endeavoured to tel l ' the s tory O f Byzantiu m i n the s pirit O f Finlay and . s s o Bury , not i n that of Gibbon He wi he t acknow ledg e his d ebt s both to the veteran O f the war of vi P REFACE . I Greek ndependence , and to the young Dubl in pro f ss r h is e o . Without their aid task would have been — ffi w a s very heavy with it the di cul ty removed . The author d oes not claim to have grappled with s O f E s al l the chronicler the a tern realm , but thinks o that some acquaintance with Am mianus, Proc pius , ’ “ Strate ikon Maurice s g , Leo the Deacon , Leo the o s o s Com n e n a Wise , C n tantine Porphyr genitu , Anna N s and iceta , may j ustify his having undertaken the h as task he essayed . F D OX O R , F eérua 8 2 i , I 9 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Politics of Roman Memory in the Age of Justinian DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the D
    The Politics of Roman Memory in the Age of Justinian DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Marion Woodrow Kruse, III Graduate Program in Greek and Latin The Ohio State University 2015 Dissertation Committee: Anthony Kaldellis, Advisor; Benjamin Acosta-Hughes; Nathan Rosenstein Copyright by Marion Woodrow Kruse, III 2015 ABSTRACT This dissertation explores the use of Roman historical memory from the late fifth century through the middle of the sixth century AD. The collapse of Roman government in the western Roman empire in the late fifth century inspired a crisis of identity and political messaging in the eastern Roman empire of the same period. I argue that the Romans of the eastern empire, in particular those who lived in Constantinople and worked in or around the imperial administration, responded to the challenge posed by the loss of Rome by rewriting the history of the Roman empire. The new historical narratives that arose during this period were initially concerned with Roman identity and fixated on urban space (in particular the cities of Rome and Constantinople) and Roman mythistory. By the sixth century, however, the debate over Roman history had begun to infuse all levels of Roman political discourse and became a major component of the emperor Justinian’s imperial messaging and propaganda, especially in his Novels. The imperial history proposed by the Novels was aggressivley challenged by other writers of the period, creating a clear historical and political conflict over the role and import of Roman history as a model or justification for Roman politics in the sixth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Combat Motivation and Cohesion in the Age of Justinian by Conor Whately, University of Winnipeg
    Combat Motivation and Cohesion in the Age of Justinian By Conor Whately, University of Winnipeg One topic that regularly recurs in the scholarship on modern warfare is combat cohesion and motivation. Many volumes have been published on these topics, and there is no sign that this interest might abate any time soon. That interest has only rarely filtered down to scholarship of the ancient and late antique worlds, however. 1 The sixth century is well suited to analyses of these issues given the abundance of varied and high quality evidence, despite the lack of attention given the subject by modern scholars. This chapter seeks to remedy this by offering an introduction to combat cohesion and motivation in the sixth century. It forms the second half of a two-part project on the subject, and the core this project is the evidence of Procopius. 2 Procopius describes more than thirty battles or sieges from the age of Justinian,3 and his battle narratives have been the subject of a good deal of research. 4 Yet there is much more work to do on sixth-century combat and our understanding Procopius’ value as a source for military history. By introducing the subject of combat cohesion and motivation in the sixth century, this paper seeks to move the discussion forward. 5 The first part of this paper will be concerned with motivation, and will explore the much discussed “ratio of fire” and its applicability in an ancient context, the presumed bellicosity of some soldiers that many of our sources hint at, and the role of fear in motivating soldiers to fight and to maintain their cohesion.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman-Barbarian Marriages in the Late Empire R.C
    ROMAN-BARBARIAN MARRIAGES IN THE LATE EMPIRE R.C. Blockley In 1964 Rosario Soraci published a study of conubia between Romans and Germans from the fourth to the sixth century A.D.1 Although the title of the work might suggest that its concern was to be with such marriages through- out the period, in fact its aim was much more restricted. Beginning with a law issued by Valentinian I in 370 or 373 to the magister equitum Theodosius (C.Th. 3.14.1), which banned on pain of death all marriages between Roman pro- vincials and barbarae or gentiles, Soraci, after assessing the context and intent of the law, proceeded to discuss its influence upon the practices of the Germanic kingdoms which succeeded the Roman Empire in the West. The text of the law reads: Nulli provineialium, cuiuscumque ordinis aut loci fuerit, cum bar- bara sit uxore coniugium, nec ulli gentilium provinciales femina copuletur. Quod si quae inter provinciales atque gentiles adfinitates ex huiusmodi nuptiis extiterit, quod in his suspectum vel noxium detegitur, capitaliter expietur. This was regarded by Soraci not as a general banning law but rather as a lim- ited attempt, in the context of current hostilities with the Alamanni, to keep those barbarians serving the Empire (gentiles)isolated from the general Roman 2 populace. The German lawmakers, however, exemplified by Alaric in his 63 64 interpretatio,3 took it as a general banning law and applied it in this spir- it, so that it became the basis for the prohibition under the Germanic king- doms of intermarriage between Romans and Germans.
    [Show full text]
  • Journeys to Byzantium? Roman Senators Between Rome and Constantinople
    Journeys to Byzantium? Roman Senators Between Rome and Constantinople Master’s Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Michael Anthony Carrozzo, B.A Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2010 Thesis Committee: Kristina Sessa, Advisor Timothy Gregory Anthony Kaldellis Copyright by Michael Anthony Carrozzo 2010 Abstract For over a thousand years, the members of the Roman senatorial aristocracy played a pivotal role in the political and social life of the Roman state. Despite being eclipsed by the power of the emperors in the first century BC, the men who made up this order continued to act as the keepers of Roman civilization for the next four hundred years, maintaining their traditions even beyond the disappearance of an emperor in the West. Despite their longevity, the members of the senatorial aristocracy faced an existential crisis following the Ostrogothic conquest of the Italian peninsula, when the forces of the Byzantine emperor Justinian I invaded their homeland to contest its ownership. Considering the role they played in the later Roman Empire, the disappearance of the Roman senatorial aristocracy following this conflict is a seminal event in the history of Italy and Western Europe, as well as Late Antiquity. Two explanations have been offered to explain the subsequent disappearance of the Roman senatorial aristocracy. The first involves a series of migrations, beginning before the Gothic War, from Italy to Constantinople, in which members of this body abandoned their homes and settled in the eastern capital.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOGRAPHY WORKBOOK for GRADES 7-12 Belisarius
    BELISARIUS BIOGRAPHY WORKBOOK FOR GRADES 7-12 Belisarius BELISARIUS (505-565 C.E.) Few men have performed Emperor Justinian, was an equally greater achievements than this remarkable personage, capable of general, to whom it was given to be conceiving and accomplishing conqueror again and again over magnificent designs, yet withal of a nations hitherto invincible, and to mean, ungenerous, ungrateful arrest, during his own lifetime, the character. Justinian was responsible disintegration of the Roman Empire. for the codification (under He lived in the early part of the sixth Christianized conditions) of the old century of the Christian era, though Roman law (known as the Justinian the date of his birth is not certainly Code), so as to serve as the foundation known, and he was in the prime of life of jurisprudence to all the European about 530. Belisarius is believed to nations except the English; the have been the son of a peasant of building of the church of St. Sophia Thrace, probably of Slavonian descent, (Hagia Sophia); and the rolling back as his name, stripped of its classical for a time the flood that on all sides form, would belong to that language was overwhelming the ancient Empire and would be Beli-than, or the White of Rome, were all due to this prince. Prince. 2. Who ruled as emperor of the 1. Describe Belisarius’ father. Eastern Roman (Byzantine) ____________________________________ Empire during the life of ____________________________________ Belisarius? ____________________________________ ____________________________________ ____________________________________ ____________________________________ ____________________________________ ____________________________________ ____________________________________ For the last two centuries, the Apparently he began life as a Eastern and the Western Roman common soldier, and gradually rose by empires had been separated, though courage and ability.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Dissent and Praise, Between Sacred and Secular: Corippus Against the African Background of the Three Chapters Controversy
    CHIARA O. TOMMASI MORESCHINI BETWEEN DISSENT AND PRAISE, BETWEEN SACRED AND SECULAR: CORIPPUS AGAINST THE AFRICAN BACKGROUND OF THE THREE CHAPTERS CONTROVERSY ESTRATTO da RIVISTA DI STORIA E LETTERATURA RELIGIOSA 2017/2 ~ a. 53 ISSN 0035-6573 n. 2 2017 Anno LIII - 2017 - n. 2 Rivista di Storia e Letteratura Religiosa diretta da G. Dagron†, C. Ossola F. A. Pennacchietti, M. Rosa, B. Stock Rivista di Storia e Letteratura Religiosa Storia Rivista di Leo S. Olschki Editore Firenze Rivista di Storia e Letteratura Religiosa diretta da GILBERT DAGRON† - CARLO OSSOLA - FABRIZIO A. PENNACCHIETTI MARIO ROSA - BRIAN STOCK Periodico quadrimestrale redatto presso l’Università degli Studi di Torino Direzione Cesare Alzati, Gilbert Dagron†, Francisco Jarauta, Carlo Ossola Benedetta Papàsogli, Fabrizio A. Pennacchietti, Daniela Rando, Mario Rosa Maddalena Scopello, Brian Stock Redazione Linda Bisello, Valerio Gigliotti, Giacomo Jori Chiara Pilocane, Davide Scotto Articoli Dattiloscritti di Articoli, Note, Recensioni, Cronache, ecc., C.O. Tommasi Moreschini, Between Dissent and Praise, between Sacred and come pure opere da recensire vanno indirizzati a: Secular: Corippus against the African background of the Three Chapters Redazione della «Rivista di Storia e Letteratura Religiosa» controversy .................................................. Pag. 201 Via Giulia di Barolo, 3, int. A – 10124 Torino M. Albertoni, L’eredità religiosa di Fanino Fanini. Integrazioni e nuovi argo- tel. +39.011.670.3861 – [email protected] menti su eresia e Inquisizione a Faenza (1550-1570) ................. » 231 Gli autori devono restituire le bozze corrette insieme ai dattiloscritti P. Palmieri, I pericoli e le risorse del mare. Il Mediterraneo nelle missioni gesui- esclusivamente alla Redazione di Torino. tiche (Napoli, secoli XVII-XVIII) ................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Carthaginians Free
    FREE THE CARTHAGINIANS PDF Dexter Hoyos | 288 pages | 09 Aug 2010 | Taylor & Francis Ltd | 9780415436458 | English | London, United Kingdom Carthage - Wikipedia But who were the people of Carthage? Pitted as the original hero of Rome and an ancestor of Romulus and Remus, Aeneas came close to marrying Dido, before being forced to leave after divine intervention. Historians today question the veracity of the Dido legend, but it is clear that Carthage was founded as a trading outpost by the Phoenicians — a maritime civilisation originally from The Carthaginians region that today forms part of Lebanon. The city gradually grew to become a major centre of Mediterranean trade, and controlled a network of dependencies in North Africa, Spain, and Sicily. Specialising in the production of fine textiles, perfumes, and household goods such as furniture and cooking implements, in its heyday Carthage was the dominant metropolis in the western Mediterranean, and profited hugely from the merchants passing through its port. The city also served as a hub for the trading of metal, and tin mined in the Middle East was brought to Carthage to be forged into bronze. Carthage was also famous for its highly sophisticated agricultural practices. One of the earliest centres of wine production, evidence of Carthaginian goods, including wine amphorae, have been excavated as far away as the British Isles and the Atlantic coast of West Africa. Ancient sources, most notably the Greek The Carthaginians Polybius, reported that the Carthaginian military was predominantly a mercenary- based force. Rather than develop a fully militarised society akin to that of ancient Sparta, the Carthaginians largely relied on others to fight on their behalf.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arsenite Schism and the Babai Rebellion: Two Case Studies
    THE ARSENITE SCHISM AND THE BABAI REBELLION: TWO CASE STUDIES IN CENTER-PERIPHERY RELATIONS by Hüsamettin ŞİMŞİR Submitted to the Institute of Social Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History Sabancı University June 2018 © Hüsamettin Şimşir 2018 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT THE ARSENITE SCHISM AND THE BABAI REBELLION: TWO CASE STUDIES IN CENTER-PERIPHERY RELATIONS Hüsamettin Şimşir M.A Thesis, June 2018 Thesis Supervisor: Dr. Fac. Member Ferenc Péter Csirkés This thesis aims to present an analysis of the interaction between Christians and Muslims in the west of Asia Minor at the end of the 13th and the beginning of the 14th centuries after two religious-social movements in the Byzantine and the Rum Seljuk Empires, the Arsenite Schism and the Babai Rebellion. After the unsuccessful rebellion of the Babais, antinomian dervishes who had migrated to the west of Asia Minor because of a heavy oppression as well as inquisition by the state and had a different religious belief apart from the mainstream religious understanding of the center initiated missionary activities in the regions along the Byzantine border. Accordingly, these dervishes had joined the military activities of the Turcoman chieftains against the Byzantines and interacted with the local Christian population and religious figures. As a result of this religious interaction, messianic and ascetic beliefs were increasingly present among the Greek-speaking population as well as spiritual leaders of western Anatolia. Since such interfaith and cross- cultural interaction had a considerable impact on the course of all these events, this thesis focuses on them to create a better understanding of the appearance of the Hesychasm in the Byzantine spiritual environment in the later period.
    [Show full text]
  • A Chronological Particular Timeline of Near East and Europe History
    Introduction This compilation was begun merely to be a synthesized, occasional source for other writings, primarily for familiarization with European world development. Gradually, however, it was forced to come to grips with the elephantine amount of historical detail in certain classical sources. Recording the numbers of reported war deaths in previous history (many thousands, here and there!) initially was done with little contemplation but eventually, with the near‐exponential number of Humankind battles (not just major ones; inter‐tribal, dynastic, and inter‐regional), mind was caused to pause and ask itself, “Why?” Awed by the numbers killed in battles over recorded time, one falls subject to believing the very occupation in war was a naturally occurring ancient inclination, no longer possessed by ‘enlightened’ Humankind. In our synthesized histories, however, details are confined to generals, geography, battle strategies and formations, victories and defeats, with precious little revealed of the highly complicated and combined subjective forces that generate and fuel war. Two territories of human existence are involved: material and psychological. Material includes land, resources, and freedom to maintain a life to which one feels entitled. It fuels war by emotions arising from either deprivation or conditioned expectations. Psychological embraces Egalitarian and Egoistical arenas. Egalitarian is fueled by emotions arising from either a need to improve conditions or defend what it has. To that category also belongs the individual for whom revenge becomes an end in itself. Egoistical is fueled by emotions arising from material possessiveness and self‐aggrandizations. To that category also belongs the individual for whom worldly power is an end in itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of the Justinian Code on Byzantine Society
    Danya Bubar Context Under Consideration: Byzantium 1. Hypothesis: The Justinian Code did not impact his Byzantine society. 2. Sources / Limitations of study Brownworth, L. (2007). 12 Byzantine Rulers: The History of the Byzantine Empire. [Audio podcast]. Retrieved from http://www.12byzantinerulers.com/rss.xml. Cameron, Averil. (2006). The Byzantines. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing. Canning, J. (1996). History of Medieval Political Thought, 300-1450. London, GBR: Routledge. Retrieved from http://site.ebrary.com.proxy.hil.unb.ca/lib/unblib/doc?id=10058158&ppg =23. Evans, J. A. S. (2000). Age of Justinian: The Circumstances of Imperial Power. London, GBR: Routledge. Retrieved from http://site.ebrary.com.proxy.hil.unb.ca/lib/unblib/doc?id=100 70712&ppg=23. Gibbon, E . (2001). Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Volume IV. London, GBR: ElecBook, 2001. p lxxiii. http://site.ebrary.com.proxy.hil.unb.ca/lib/unblib/doc? id=2001727&ppg=73. Gigantès, P. (2002). The Secret History of Rulers of the World. London: Magpie Books. Nicol, D. M. (1991). A Biographical Dictionary of the Byzantine Empire. London: Seaby. Stein, P. (1999). Roman Law in European History. Port Chester, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press http://site.ebrary.com.proxy.hil.unb.ca/lib/unblib/doc?id=10014895 &ppg=43. Tellegen-Couperus, O. (1993). Short History of Roman Law. London, GBR: Routledge, Retrieved from http://site.ebrary.com.proxy.hil.unb.ca/lib/unblib/doc?id=10060619 &ppg=153. Venning, T. (2006). A Chronology of the Byzantine Empire. Great Britain: Palmgrave MacMillian. Limitations of these sources may lie within the authors’ observations of the historical contexts being discusses; this may suggest the presence of author bias, given that the information provided is subjective to their interpretation.
    [Show full text]
  • How Orthodox Is the Eastern Orthodox Church?
    How Orthodox is the Eastern Orthodox Church? Introduction As a result of some questions I thought it wise to give a simple evaluation of the Eastern Orthodox Church (EOC). 1 This is even more relevant since recent decades have seen hordes of evangelicals (especially disaffected Charismatics) relocate into the EOC under the presumption that it has more fundamental historic prestige than modern churches. While in some doctrines the EOC has been a safeguard of apostolic and early church patriarchal teaching (such as the Trinity), and while they hold to good Greek NT manuscripts, we should not accept a multitude of other teachings and practices which are unbiblical. You should also be aware that this church has formally condemned Calvinism in church statutes. The answer to the question, ‘ How Orthodox is the Eastern Orthodox Church? ’ is simply, ‘ Not very; in fact it is downright heretical in doctrine and practice ’. Here are the reasons why; but first I will give a potted history of the Orthodox Church. History What is the EOC? The Orthodox Church, or the Eastern Orthodox Church, 2 is a federation of Churches originating in the Greek-speaking Church of the Byzantine Empire, which reject the authority of the Roman Pope. It has the Patriarch of Constantinople 3 as its head and uses elaborate and archaic rituals. It calls itself, ‘The Holy Orthodox Catholic and Apostolic Church’. I will try to make this very complicated history as simple as I can. The history is also hindered by different sources contradicting each other and making mistakes of fact. Pre Chalcedon (to 451) The initial foundations of Greek theology were laid down by the Greek Fathers, such as Athanasius, John Chrysostom, Cyril of Alexandria, and the Cappadocian Fathers (the ‘Three Hierarchs’) i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Defeat the Vandals in Combat 115
    How to Defeat the Vandals in Combat 115 Chapter 3 How to Defeat the Vandals in Combat Unlike some aspects of Roman North Africa in late antiquity, such as Saint Augustine, and Egypt, the Vandal Wars and the reconquest are subjects that have attracted limited attention.1 Again, Procopius is the principal source for most of what he describes,2 and most narrative accounts merely follow his lead.3 The war itself marks the beginning of Justinian’s campaigns of recon- quest; it also contributed significantly to the fame of Belisarius. This chapter is divided into the same three sections as the previous chapter, following an his- torical overview. Thus, the first significant section focuses on the literary qualities of Procopius’ descriptions of combat in the Vandal Wars, and in the process we delve deeper into select aspects of modern narrative theory, at least where relevant. Topics include the role of narrative order, the role of the narra- tor, the use of narrative markers like names and numbers, and some of the ways that the combats fit into the larger narrative. The principal emphasis of this section is on exploring some of the ways that Procopius, the implied author, attempts to guide readers in the Vandal Wars. In other words, we look at the ways that Procopius, more here than in the Persian Wars, leads his read- ers and listeners towards the particular lessons that he is expounding. In the third section, on explaining combat, we look at the different character of much of the combat (the increase in asymmetric combat), the different factors that shaped its outcome from morale (much more prominent in the Vandal Wars 1 There has been a fair amount of work on Corippus, on whom see the works of Cameron (1996a: 12–25; 1996b: 167–180), Zarini (1997, esp.
    [Show full text]