BYZANTINE CAMEOS and the AESTHETICS of the ICON By

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

BYZANTINE CAMEOS and the AESTHETICS of the ICON By BYZANTINE CAMEOS AND THE AESTHETICS OF THE ICON by James A. Magruder, III A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland March 2014 © 2014 James A. Magruder, III All rights reserved Abstract Byzantine icons have attracted artists and art historians to what they saw as the flat style of large painted panels. They tend to understand this flatness as a repudiation of the Classical priority to represent Nature and an affirmation of otherworldly spirituality. However, many extant sacred portraits from the Byzantine period were executed in relief in precious materials, such as gemstones, ivory or gold. Byzantine writers describe contemporary icons as lifelike, sometimes even coming to life with divine power. The question is what Byzantine Christians hoped to represent by crafting small icons in precious materials, specifically cameos. The dissertation catalogs and analyzes Byzantine cameos from the end of Iconoclasm (843) until the fall of Constantinople (1453). They have not received comprehensive treatment before, but since they represent saints in iconic poses, they provide a good corpus of icons comparable to icons in other media. Their durability and the difficulty of reworking them also makes them a particularly faithful record of Byzantine priorities regarding the icon as a genre. In addition, the dissertation surveys theological texts that comment on or illustrate stone to understand what role the materiality of Byzantine cameos played in choosing stone relief for icons. Finally, it examines Byzantine epigrams written about or for icons to define the terms that shaped icon production. The study finds that Byzantine cameos are exceptionally homogeneous: nearly all in relief, representing sacred persons against a blank ground, and typically cut in green stones. Where middle Byzantine cameos are most homogeneous, later Byzantine examples ii show more variety of stone, color and style. While theological sources do not construct a symbolism of materials, they generally associate the Prophet Daniel's dream of a stone not cut by human hands with Christ's reign through the mediation of icons in precious materials. Byzantine poetry, on the other hand, emphasizes the icon as a renewal of Creation. The dissertation concludes that Byzantine cameos were made not so much for personal protection as for public display of divine power. They reveal icons as traces of that presence in Creation, renewing humanity in the present age. Advisor: Henry Maguire Second Reader: Nino Zchomelidse iii Preface Because my research draws on a wide variety of sources in languages that are less familiar to Western scholars, I have avoided most abbreviations except for the standard American journal of Byzantine studies: DOP, that is Dumbarton Oaks Papers. J. P. Migne's Patrologia Graeca is abbreviated as PG and his Patrologia Latina as PL. The Clavis patrum graecorum is CPG. In transliterating Byzantine words and names, I have followed alphabetic rather than phonetic conventions and Anglicized universal Christian forenames, like Mary and John. A vexing issue of terminology and thought in Byzantine art is the inflation of epithets for the Theotokos, several of which refer to icons kept in famous monasteries of Constantinople and which are used inconsistently both in the sources and modern literature. The most famous icon comes from the Blachernae Monastery, the Blachernitissa, which seems to have featured a full-length Theotokos orant. I have chosen to use Blachernitissa to refer to both full-length and bust portraits of the Theotokos with arms outstretched or in front of her body, as this seems to be the most consistent use of the term in Byzantine sources. Similarly we can understand the Hodegetria from the Monastery of the Hodegon district as an image of the Theotokos holding the Christ child in her left arm and pointing to him with her right hand. Because hodegoi means “guides,” the gesture came to be associated with her gesture of pointing out the Christ and is an easy way to remember the type. A variant of her holding Him in her right arm is usually called the Dexiokratousa, literally right-handed holding. Another early iconography that emerged from the period of Iconoclasm featured the Theotokos holding a clipeated iv portrait of the Pantokrator or Christ child and was often termed the Nikopoios or victory maker. By the twelfth century, bust-length images of the Theotokos with a medallion of Christ over her chest and womb became widespread and were frequently called Platytera or wider than the heavens after an epithet in hymnography. One also finds many images of her turned to the side with arms upraised, sometimes to a cloud with the hand of God or Christ, which often are termed Hagiosoritissa. When the Theotokos turns sideways and holds a scroll, it is sometimes called Antiphonites after the function of her icon responding to another icon of Christ in the naos of certain churches. Terminology for gemstones also can prove confusing, because scholars often repeat terms from older catalogs without reference to the field of gemology. Museums now generally separate the geological species of nephrite (jade) from jadeite, although some people continue to refer to both as jade. Bloodstone is a solid green species of chalcedony (a cryptocrystalline quartz) found in the Rhodope Mountains of Thrace that border Greece, Bulgaria and Turkey. Bloodstone also is used to refer to the green stone with yellow inclusions. When the dark green chalcedony exhibits red inclusions like speckles, flecks or bands, it is called bloodstone. Bloodstone and bloodstone appear from a deep green to almost black stone with a waxy luster. Prase or chrysoprase is another green variety of chalcedony, although it is a rather light and bright green due to the inclusions of nickel in its formation. Serpentine is a similar but distinct species of gem that appears mottled or streaked with various shades of green and comes from the Greek province of Thessaly, which was known since Antiquity for its green marble. I use the appellation jasper largely for the red variety, unless otherwise noted. The other major variety of stones used for Byzantine cameos are the multilayered v chalcedony gems known as onyx or sardonyx. Onyx refers to the stone with alternating layers of black and white to light blue used for many Roman state cameos. Sardonyx indicates a stone with alternating layers of rust to brown and white. It was popular for Hellenistic imperial cameos and continued to be popular into Roman times. The attraction to using either stone was the ability of the lapidary to model a range of tones in subtly varied depths. Because this project investigates fields as diverse as alchemy and geology, in addition to more traditional historical sources, it has indebted me to many scholars. I have received generous help accessing Byzantine cameos from Georgi Parpulov at the Walters Art Museum, Baltimore; Stephen Zwirn at Dumbarton Oaks in Washington, DC; Helen Evans of the Metropolitan Museum, New York City; Richard Witschonke of the American Numismatic Society, New York City; Robert Ousterhout of the University of Pennsylvania; staff of the Victoria & Albert Museum, London; Antje Scherner of the Museumslandschaft Hessen in Kassel; Martin Hirsch in the Staatliche Münzsammlung, Munich; Michał Miśliński of the Instytut Sztuki PAN, Krakow; and Yuriy Piatnitsky of the Hermitage Museum in St. Petersburg. I was humbled to receive accommodation and guidance from Charalambos Bakirtzis of the 9th Ephoreia of Byzantine Antiquities on a study trip to Thessaloniki in June 2005. Maria Vassilaki graciously invited me to attend a conference on Byzantine sculpture at the University of Thessaly, Volos in June 2009. That trip was generously funded by a Sadie and Louis Roth Fellowship from Johns Hopkins University. At Johns Hopkins University, I was fortunate to begin my study of alchemy with advice from Lawrence Principe. Recently I have benefited from the kind nudges of Mitchell Merback and the insightful comments of Nino Zchomelidse. I am grateful to vi Henry Maguire for shepherding the dissertation through unforeseen twists and turns, as well as to Eunice Maguire for her friendly encouragement over the years. Finally, Laurel encouraged me to pursue doctoral studies and provided the financial stability to complete them. vii Table of Contents Abstract................................................................................................................................ii Preface.................................................................................................................................iv List of Figures......................................................................................................................ix Introduction.........................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1. Cameos of the Middle Byzantine Period (9th–12th c.).......................................13 Materials and Subjects of Byzantine Cameos.........................................................32 Transition from Late Antique to Byzantine Glyptic..............................................39 Style and Dating of Middle Byzantine Cameos......................................................46 Daniel in the Lions' Den.........................................................................................61 Conclusions............................................................................................................68
Recommended publications
  • Lighting and Byzantine Glass Tesserae
    EVA London Conference ~ 11–13 July 2007 Eva Zányi, Carla Schroer, Mark Mudge, and Alan Chalmers _____________________________________________________________________ LIGHTING AND BYZANTINE GLASS TESSERAE Eva Zányi†, Carla Schroer‡, Mark Mudge‡, Alan Chalmers† † Warwick Digital Laboratory University of Warwick Coventry CV4 7AL United Kingdom [email protected], [email protected] http://www.warwickdigital.org ‡ Cultural Heritage Imaging San Francisco USA [email protected], [email protected] http://www.c-h-i.org Abstract – A key component of many Byzantine churches was the mosaics on the curved walls and ceilings, which included gold and silver glass tesserae. As the viewer or the light moved within the church, these tesserae sparkled. In this paper we describe how we captured a Polynomial Texture Map of the apse mosaic at the Angeloktisti Church at Kiti, Cyprus and used it to investigate how the position of the lighting may have affected the appearance of the mosaic. Our study showed that the appearance of the mosaics is indeed significantly different when lit from various directions. INTRODUCTION From the outside Byzantine churches look unimposing; without much decoration, no paint or precious materials. This is very different to the interior, which provided those inside the space with dramatic visual affects aiming at alleviating and engaging the viewer to approach God [14]. The architecture used light and shadow to symbolically represent different sacral hierarchies and direct the attention of the viewer. Therefore the upper parts of the churches, which represented heaven, were better lit than the lower parts. In early Byzantium this was achieved with the help of daylight through small xxxx Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crisis of the Fourth Crusade in Byzantium (1203-1204) and the Emergence of Networks for Anti-Latin Reaction and Political Action
    The Crisis of the Fourth Crusade in Byzantium (1203-1204) and the Emergence of Networks for Anti-Latin Reaction and Political Action Ilias GIARENIS In spite of a great number of important publications on the relevant issues,1 the Fourth Crusade and its impact in the Eastern Mediterranean are often – even nowadays – neither fully apprehended nor sufficiently explained. Important aspects of the rich scientific debate still are the collapse of the Byzantine state, the formation of smaller political entities, and the processes through which such immense changes took place. As is well known, the two most prominent among those successor polities were the States of Nicaea and of Epirus, which were both established mainly by members of the high Byzantine Constantinopolitan aristocracy;2 neverheless, the empire of Trebizond, where the imperial legacy of the Komnenoi had been considered as a solid ground for the Grand Komnenoi rulership, should also not be neglected in the study of the historical framework.3 The events of 1203/1204 led to the conquest of Constantinople by the Latin Crusaders, the milites Christi of the Fourth Crusade who had reached the Byzantine capital in a “diversion” from the declared original destination of the Crusade, i.e. Jerusalem. The latter, a Sacred *This paper is dedicated to Nikolaos G. Moschonas. 1 See D. E. Queller and Th. F. Madden, The Fourth Crusade. The Conquest of Constantinople, second edition, Philadelphia 1997; M Angold, The Fourth Crusade. Event and Context, [The Medieval World] Harlow 2003; J. Phillips, The Fourth Crusade and the Sack of Constantinople, London 2004; Urbs Capta.
    [Show full text]
  • Visualizing the Byzantine City the Art of Memory
    Abstracts Visualizing the Byzantine City Charalambos Bakirtzis Depictions of cities: in the icon “Allegory of Jerusalem on High,” two cities are depicted, one in the foothills and the other at the edge of a rocky mountain. The lengthy inscription of the icon is of interest from a town-planning and architectural standpoint. The imperial Christian city: in the mosaics of the Rotunda in Thessalonike, the city is not shown with walls, but with palaces and other splendid public buildings, declaring the emperor’s authority as the sole ruler and guarantor of the unity of the state and the well-being of cities, which was replaced by the authority of Christ. The appearance of the walled city: all the events shown in the mosaics (seventh century) of the basilica of St. Demetrios are taking place outside the walls of the city, probably beside the roads that lead to it. The city’s chora not only protected the city; it was also protected by it. A description of the city/kastron: John Kameniates lived through the capture of Thessalonike by the Arabs in the summer of 904. At the beginning of the narrative, he prefixes a lengthy description/encomium of Thessalonike. The means of approaching the place indicate that the way the city is described by Kameniates suits a visual description. Visualizing the Late Byzantine city: A. In an icon St. Demetrios is shown astride a horse. In the background, Thessalonike is depicted from above. A fitting comment on this depiction of Thessalonike is offered by John Staurakios because he renders the admiration called forth by the large Late Byzantine capitals in connection with the abandoned countryside.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadio-Byzantina a Newsletter Published by the Canadian Committee of No.32, January 2021 Byzantinists
    Canadio-Byzantina A Newsletter published by the Canadian Committee of No.32, January 2021 Byzantinists St Saviour in Chora (Kariye Camii) the last judgement (14th century); the church, having been a museum, is now being reconverted to a mosque Contents: Book Review (S. Moffat) 26 Activities of Member 3 Obituaries 28 Reports & Articles AIEB business 30 Report on Baturyn (V. Mezentsev) 13 Short notices 33 The Perpetual Conquest (O. Heilo) 18 Disputatio Virtualis 34 Crisis at the Border CIBS 1990s lecture links 35 of Byzantium (p. boudreau) 22 Essay Competition 35 2 A Newsletter published by the Canadian Committee of Byzantinists No.32, January 2021 Introductory remarks Welcome to the ninth bulletin that I have put I have repeated some information from an earlier together, incorporating, as usual, reports on our issue here to do with the lectures given in the members’ activities, reports on conferences and 1990s, originally organised by the Canadian articles, a book review, and announcements on Institute for Balkan Studies; among the authors forthcoming activities or material or events of the papers are Speros Vyronis, Jr., Ihor relevant to Byzantinists. Ševèenko and Warren Treadgold. I alluded to them in passing last year, but I thought it sensible Readers will note that this issue is rather less to give full details here: see p.35 below. handsomely produced than than the last few, for which I can only apologise. Chris Dickert, who There is no need for me to comment here on the had polished the latest issues so well, is no problems all have faced this year; many longer available to help, so that I must fall back colleagues mention them in their annual reports.
    [Show full text]
  • The Costume of Byzantine Emperors and Empresses ’
    Shaw, C. (2011) ‘The Costume of Byzantine Emperors and Empresses ’ Rosetta 9.5: 55-59. http://www.rosetta.bham.ac.uk/colloquium2011/shaw_costume.pdf http://www.rosetta.bham.ac.uk/colloquium2011/shaw_costume.pdf The Costume of the Byzantine Emperors and Empresses Carol Shaw PhD candidate, 4th year (part-time) University of Birmingham, College of Arts and Law [email protected] The Costume of the Byzantine Emperors and Empresses The first Roman emperors were all members of the senate and continued to belong to it throughout their reigns.1 All the members of the senate including the emperor wore tunics and togas decorated with a wide purple band, the latus clavus, and special footwear.2 During the period of instability in the early third century several emperors were selected by the army.3 Initially this shift in power did not affect court ceremony and dress; but slowly both began to change. Court ceremony became more formal and emperors distanced themselves even from senators.4 During the late third century, Diocletian introduced the new court ceremony of the adoration of the purple; according to Aurelius Victor, the emperor also wore richly brocaded purple robes, silks and jeweled sandals.5 Diocletian’s abdication ceremony illustrates that court ceremony and dress often remained very simple. The only garment closely associated with imperial power at this time was the emperor’s purple robes. In his On the Deaths of the Persecutors, Lactantius records that in AD 305 when Diocletian abdicated, the ceremony consisted of the emperor standing under a statue of his patron deity, 1 Under the law the Lex Ovinia (enacted by 318 BC), censors selected each senator according to certain criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Byzantine Iconoclasm
    Byzantine Iconoclasm %rom &i'ipedia, the free encyclopedia The Byzantine Iconoclasm )*reek: Εἰκονομαχία, Eikonomachía) refers to t,o periods in the history of the Byzantine -mpire ,hen -mperors, bac'ed by imperially-appointed leaders and councils of the *reek /rthodox Church, imposed a ban on religious images or icons. The 0%irst Iconoclasm0, as it is sometimes called, lasted bet,een about 123 and 141, ,hen a change on the throne reversed the ban. The 05econd Iconoclasm0 ,as bet,een 4#6 and 467. Iconoclasm, *reek for 0image-brea'ing0, is the deliberate destruction ,ithin a culture of the culture's own religious icons and other symbols or monuments, usually for religious or political motives. People ,ho engage in or support iconoclasm are called iconoclasts, a term that has come to be applied figuratively to any person ,ho brea's or disdains established dogmata or conventions. Conversely, A simple cross: example of people ,ho revere or venerate religious images are iconoclast art in the Hagia derisively called 0iconolaters0 )εἰκονολάτραι+. (hey Irene Church in Istanbul. are normally 'nown as 0iconodules0 )εἰκονόδουλοι+, or 0iconophiles0 )εἰκονόφιλοι+. Iconoclasm may be carried out by people of a different religion, but is often the result of sectarian disputes bet,een factions of the same religion. In Christianity, iconoclasm has generally been motivated by an 0/ld.Covenant0 interpretation of the Ten Commandments, ,hich forbid the ma'ing and ,orshipping of 0graven images0, see also Biblical la, in Christianity. The t,o serious outbrea's of iconoclasm in the Byzantine -mpire during the 4th and !th centuries ,ere unusual in that the use of images ,as the main issue in the dispute, rather Byzantine Iconoclasm, Chludov than a by-product of ,ider concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Quiet Annexation of South Ossetia
    FEBRUARY 2015 Russia’s quiet annexation of south ossetia By Maia Otarashvili Maia Otarashvili is an FPRI Research Associate and Program Coordinator for FPRI's Project on Democratic Transitions. Her research has focused on democratic consolidation and regression in the EU-11 countries, as well as on fragile hybrid states such as Georgia, Moldova, Ukraine and other former USSR states in the Black Sea and Caucasus region. Maia holds an MA in Globalization, Development and Transition from the University of Westminster in London, with emphasis on post-authoritarian transitions. All Georgian- and Russian-language material has been translated by the author. Russia and South Ossetia have ironed out final details of a “Treaty of Alliance and Integration.” The treaty was drafted in December 2014 and on January 31, 2015 Georgian news agencies reported that the leader of South Ossetia, Leonid Tibilov, had sent the finalized document back to Moscow. On February 18th Russia and South Ossetia signed a precursor to this treaty, called the “treaty on the state border.” According to Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, the broader treaty is still under consideration, but “the approval process won’t take long.” Once the Treaty of Alliance and Integration is signed, it is set to be implemented in a matter of three to six months, allowing Russia to absorb South Ossetia. This comes less than three months after the signing of the Russia-Abkhazia treaty of a similar nature, although it is not as comprehensive. The international community and the Georgian government have condemned Russia’s actions and will not recognize either of the treaties but that is not likely to stem Putin’s expansionist policies – if Crimea is any guide.
    [Show full text]
  • Publications Without, However, Aspiring to Completeness. Paul
    Jonathan Shepard publications without, however, aspiring to completeness. Paul Stephenson has provided a valuable review-article of secondary literature published in a western language on the history of the early Hungarians, while his book on Byzantium’s Balkan frontier sets the activities of Hungarians in the tenth century within the broader context of imperial Byzantine diplomacy, emergent Balkan polities and the needs of nomads. Stephenson and Tóth, building on the earlier work of Macartney and Göckenjan, point to the strong probability that the lands east of the Tisza were occupied by the De administrando’s Kavars (Kabaroi). These, in turn, may be associated with the “Khalisioi”/Kaliz, a grouping of Khazar provenance known from later Hungarian sources to have occupied the valley of the Tisza in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries. Constantine VII could well have drawn heavily on Kavar informants for his contemporary data about the Hungarians’ lands, and the De administrando’s generous coverage of this grouping in comparison with the other units of Hungarians becomes the more understandable. In addition, a number of scholars have independently reached the conclusion that imperial attention to, knowledge about, and policy towards a region or people fluctuated drastically in accordance with the empire’s ever- changing needs and apprehensions of perils. Stephenson’s book shows how adaptable Byzantine administrative arrangements were after the defeat of the Rus and the Bulgarians in 971. Comparable flexibility was applied to the northern borderlands after final victory over the Bulgarians had been won in 1018, and in the territories reconquered from the eastern Muslims in the 960s and 970s.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Sea-Caspian Steppe: Natural Conditions 20 1.1 the Great Steppe
    The Pechenegs: Nomads in the Political and Cultural Landscape of Medieval Europe East Central and Eastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 450–1450 General Editors Florin Curta and Dušan Zupka volume 74 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/ecee The Pechenegs: Nomads in the Political and Cultural Landscape of Medieval Europe By Aleksander Paroń Translated by Thomas Anessi LEIDEN | BOSTON This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided no alterations are made and the original author(s) and source are credited. Further information and the complete license text can be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ The terms of the CC license apply only to the original material. The use of material from other sources (indicated by a reference) such as diagrams, illustrations, photos and text samples may require further permission from the respective copyright holder. Publication of the presented monograph has been subsidized by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education within the National Programme for the Development of Humanities, Modul Universalia 2.1. Research grant no. 0046/NPRH/H21/84/2017. National Programme for the Development of Humanities Cover illustration: Pechenegs slaughter prince Sviatoslav Igorevich and his “Scythians”. The Madrid manuscript of the Synopsis of Histories by John Skylitzes. Miniature 445, 175r, top. From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository. Proofreading by Philip E. Steele The Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available online at http://catalog.loc.gov LC record available at http://catalog.loc.gov/2021015848 Typeface for the Latin, Greek, and Cyrillic scripts: “Brill”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Icon in Byzantine Piety by LENNART RYDEN
    The Role of the Icon in Byzantine Piety By LENNART RYDEN In February 754, the bishops of the Byzantine Empire met in the imperial palace at Hiereia, a peninsula on the Asiatic side of the Sea of Marmora, not far from Chalcedon. The council had been convened by the Emperor Constantine V (741-75), who wanted the bishops to examine the scriptures and express their opinion on the "deceitful painting of likenesses, which draws away the human mind from the service which is sublime and befits the Divinity to the grovelling and material service of creatures"1. As the phrasing shows, the assembled bishops were not expected to discuss whether the making of icons2 was justified or not. The emperor had already examined this question and found that there was no such justification. The purpose of the council was rather to remove unorthodox elements from the emperor's argument, to give it a theological finish and to put it into a historical context. The proceedings lasted six months. In August a horos (definition) was approved, which may be summarized as follows3. In order to separate man from God, Lucifer made man worship the crea- ture rather than the Creator (cf. Rom. i,25). God, who wanted to save man, sent him the Law and the prophets. When man failed to return to his former state, God at last sent His own Son and Logos. Christ saved man from idolatry and taught him to worship in spirit and truth (cf. John iv ,24). The Christian apostles and teachers passed on the true faith to later generations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Developmentof Early Imperial Dress from the Tetrachs to The
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Birmingham Research Archive, E-theses Repository University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. The Development of Early Imperial Dress from the Tetrarchs to the Herakleian Dynasty General Introduction The emperor, as head of state, was the most important and powerful individual in the land; his official portraits and to a lesser extent those of the empress were depicted throughout the realm. His image occurred most frequently on small items issued by government officials such as coins, market weights, seals, imperial standards, medallions displayed beside new consuls, and even on the inkwells of public officials. As a sign of their loyalty, his portrait sometimes appeared on the patches sown on his supporters’ garments, embossed on their shields and armour or even embellishing their jewelry. Among more expensive forms of art, the emperor’s portrait appeared in illuminated manuscripts, mosaics, and wall paintings such as murals and donor portraits. Several types of statues bore his likeness, including those worshiped as part of the imperial cult, examples erected by public 1 officials, and individual or family groupings placed in buildings, gardens and even harbours at the emperor’s personal expense.
    [Show full text]
  • Manolis G. Varvounis * – Nikos Rodosthenous Religious
    Manolis G. Varvounis – Nikos Rodosthenous Religious Traditions of Mount Athos on Miraculous Icons of Panagia (The Mother of God) At the monasteries and hermitages of Mount Athos, many miraculous icons are kept and exhibited, which are honored accordingly by the monks and are offered for worship to the numerous pilgrims of the holy relics of Mount Athos.1 The pil- grims are informed about the monastic traditions of Mount Athos regarding these icons, their origin, and their miraculous action, during their visit to the monasteries and then they transfer them to the world so that they are disseminated systemati- cally and they can become common knowledge of all believers.2 In this way, the traditions regarding the miraculous icons of Mount Athos become wide-spread and are considered an essential part of religious traditions not only of the Greek people but also for other Orthodox people.3 Introduction Subsequently, we will examine certain aspects of these traditions, based on the literature, notably the recent work on the miraculous icons in the monasteries of Mount Athos, where, except for the archaeological and the historical data of these specific icons, also information on the wonders, their origin and their supernatural action over the centuries is captured.4 These are information that inspired the peo- ple accordingly and are the basis for the formation of respective traditions and re- ligious customs that define the Greek folk religiosity. Many of these traditions relate to the way each icon ended up in the monastery where is kept today. According to the archetypal core of these traditions, the icon was thrown into the sea at the time of iconoclasm from a region of Asia Minor or the Near East, in order to be saved from destruction, and miraculously arrived at the monastery.
    [Show full text]