Lighting and Byzantine Glass Tesserae

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lighting and Byzantine Glass Tesserae EVA London Conference ~ 11–13 July 2007 Eva Zányi, Carla Schroer, Mark Mudge, and Alan Chalmers _____________________________________________________________________ LIGHTING AND BYZANTINE GLASS TESSERAE Eva Zányi†, Carla Schroer‡, Mark Mudge‡, Alan Chalmers† † Warwick Digital Laboratory University of Warwick Coventry CV4 7AL United Kingdom [email protected], [email protected] http://www.warwickdigital.org ‡ Cultural Heritage Imaging San Francisco USA [email protected], [email protected] http://www.c-h-i.org Abstract – A key component of many Byzantine churches was the mosaics on the curved walls and ceilings, which included gold and silver glass tesserae. As the viewer or the light moved within the church, these tesserae sparkled. In this paper we describe how we captured a Polynomial Texture Map of the apse mosaic at the Angeloktisti Church at Kiti, Cyprus and used it to investigate how the position of the lighting may have affected the appearance of the mosaic. Our study showed that the appearance of the mosaics is indeed significantly different when lit from various directions. INTRODUCTION From the outside Byzantine churches look unimposing; without much decoration, no paint or precious materials. This is very different to the interior, which provided those inside the space with dramatic visual affects aiming at alleviating and engaging the viewer to approach God [14]. The architecture used light and shadow to symbolically represent different sacral hierarchies and direct the attention of the viewer. Therefore the upper parts of the churches, which represented heaven, were better lit than the lower parts. In early Byzantium this was achieved with the help of daylight through small xxxx Figure 1. Outside of the church of Panagia Angeloktisti at Kiti, Cyprus. 22.1 EVA London Conference ~ 11–13 July 2007 Eva Zányi, Carla Schroer, Mark Mudge, and Alan Chalmers _____________________________________________________________________ openings in the upper parts of the walls. From middle Byzantium on, the buildings had less openings letting in natural light and these were replaced by oil lamps and candles [18]. The positioning of these artificial lights was regulated in great detail in manuals, so called typicons, in order to underline the difference between divine light and profane darkness and to let their flickering make precious materials such as the gold and silver of the icons, mosaics and frescoes, sparkle and draw the viewer into contemplation [1]. BYZANTINE GLASS MOSAICS The Romans perfected techniques for the design and construction of intricate floor mosaics, using natural resistant materials. The Byzantines extended these methods to wall mosaics and were able to now include fragile materials and more precious one such as the glass gold and silver tesserae [19]. Since so few of the mosaics are left, it has previously been assumed that they were very expensive, especially those which contained glass tesserae. However, recently James questioned this assumption and suggested that the raw material, glass, was not expensive, since Byzantine was close to desert regions and suppliers [5]. She further suggested that manufacturers of glass tesserae were spread all over the Byzantine Empire and in fact the setting of the mosaics was the most expensive aspect since it was very labour intense. All this means that mosaics were far more widely spread than previously believed and would also explain why small and politically insignificant churches such as Kiti, which were not situated in any major centre, were so decorated. The glass tesserae were manufactured in a number of ways and often coloured. Metallic tesserae such as gold and silver ones were made by covering a ca 6mm thick glass plate with, for example gold leaf, and then coating it with a thin layer of transparent or coloured glass. The sandwiched glass plate was then heated up until the layers fused and subsequently cut into pieces. The surfaces of the tesserae were slightly uneven and different effects could be achieved depending on if the glossy or the rougher surface was exposed on the mosaic [6.10]. SELECTION OF THE SITE Only few wall mosaics are left from the early Byzantium, since most were destroyed during the 300 years of Arab expansion and invasions, the iconoclasm period of Byzantine history of the 8th and 9th centuries and also because of natural disasters such as earthquakes and fires. The three extensive apse mosaics on Cyprus dating from the 6th and 7th century are consequently very unique. They show the Virgin Mary and Child and were placed in quite small and remote churches, which did not belong to the Pope or any other financially strong ruler [17]. The three churches are: the church of Panagia Kyra at Livadia, the church of Panagia Kanakaria at Lythrankomi [8] and the church of Panagia Angeloktisti at Kiti. From these three, the ones in Livadia and Lithrankomi are, since 1974, in the occupied Turkish section of Cyprus and therefore difficult to access [16]. Apart from the accessibility problem, these two were very badly damaged after the occupation. How much is left of the mosaic in Livadia is in fact not known. Kiti, close to Larnaca on the Greek part of Cyprus, has, however, a well preserved, unrestored apse mosaic and was thus chosen for our study. The mosaic comprises the Virgin Mary holding the Child with the Archangel Gabriel on the right and the Archangel Michael on the left [3.16], Figure 2. The mosaic is lit today from slightly below by spot lights, and thus a large part of the mosaic is not well lit. The church is still in full use with regular orthodox masses taking place and several visits by large tourist groups and school children per day. 22.2 EVA London Conference ~ 11–13 July 2007 Eva Zányi, Carla Schroer, Mark Mudge, and Alan Chalmers _____________________________________________________________________ REFLECTION TRANSFORMATION IMAGING (RTI) RTI is a term coined by Malzbender and Gelb of Hewlett Packard Labs. RTI captures the “real world” reflectance characteristics of a subject. A simple, robust, and forgiving way to capture RTI information is the use of Polynomial Texture Mapping (PTM). PTMs store surface reflection information with each image pixel. Malzbender et al., inventors of PTM [9], presented a mathematical model describing luminance information for each pixel in an image in terms of a function representing the direction of incident illumination. The illumination direction function is approximated in the form of a biquadratic polynomial whose six coefficients are stored along with the colour information of each pixel. This surface reflection information describes the subject’s surface normals. This normal information indicates the directional vector’s perpendicular to the subject’s surface at each location recorded by the corresponding image pixel. Consequently, PTMs are 2D images containing true 3D information. PTMs are also able to record approximations of other reflection-related properties including surface inter-reflection, subsurface scattering, and self-shadowing. PTMs can communicate useful shape information using purely image based transformations without full photometric stereo or other reconstruction from the surface normals using 3D geometry in Cartesian space. The normals of a surface describe its shape and are used by computer graphics lighting models to determine surface reflection properties. In 3D virtual reality representations, normals are used by lighting models to calculate how light rays will reflect off the surface of virtual 3D geometry. The normal information present in RTIs allows them to use similar 3D lighting techniques. The software used to view RTIs employs these 3D lighting models. RTI images are interactive. Their dynamic interplay of light and shadow works with the human visual system to communicate a powerful perception of the object’s shape [2.7] While RTIs can be used to communicate the effects of different illumination directions on a surface, they can also transform surface normal information to enhance the perception of surface features. This enables RTIs to not only disclose surface characteristics not visible in any of its constituent source photographs, but also reveal information not readily discernable by direct physical examination. This characteristic of RTI has been dramatically demonstrated by its recent use in revealing the nature and use of the Antikythera Mechanism, a 2nd century geared astronomical computation device [4]. A key characteristic of RTIs captured with the PTM method is that complete surface normal information can be acquired from highly shiny, specular materials such as gold without data loss associated with clipping due to specular highlights. PTMs have been demonstrated to effectively capture highly reflective surfaces without data loss due to shadows or specular highlights during the documentation of gold and silver coins as well as highly reflective stone tools [13]. This property has been used to great advantage in our project with the Byzantine mosaic and gold leafed icons at Kiti. The apse mosaic contains numerous tesserae, essentially glass gold and silver leaf ‘sandwiches’. The icons contain gold leaf and tempera painting techniques intended to produce reflective effects. Gold, silver and glass are notoriously difficult to capture through either using photography or active 3D range scanning, due to their highly specular nature. Our successful capture of these subjects and relighting with the simulated illumination conditions for which they were designed underscore the usefulness of PTM based RTI techniques for these classes of cultural heritage subjects. 22.3 EVA London Conference ~ 11–13 July 2007 Eva Zányi, Carla Schroer, Mark Mudge, and Alan Chalmers _____________________________________________________________________ The preceding attributes of RTIs and PTMs as well as their use in cultural heritage documentation projects, the natural sciences, and law enforcement has been detailed extensively elsewhere, including [3.4.9.11.12.13.20]. Capturing RTIs using PTMs To capture single-viewpoint PTM images, the subject is photographed from a fixed camera position. Multiple photos are shot, each illuminated from a different light position.
Recommended publications
  • BYZANTINE CAMEOS and the AESTHETICS of the ICON By
    BYZANTINE CAMEOS AND THE AESTHETICS OF THE ICON by James A. Magruder, III A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland March 2014 © 2014 James A. Magruder, III All rights reserved Abstract Byzantine icons have attracted artists and art historians to what they saw as the flat style of large painted panels. They tend to understand this flatness as a repudiation of the Classical priority to represent Nature and an affirmation of otherworldly spirituality. However, many extant sacred portraits from the Byzantine period were executed in relief in precious materials, such as gemstones, ivory or gold. Byzantine writers describe contemporary icons as lifelike, sometimes even coming to life with divine power. The question is what Byzantine Christians hoped to represent by crafting small icons in precious materials, specifically cameos. The dissertation catalogs and analyzes Byzantine cameos from the end of Iconoclasm (843) until the fall of Constantinople (1453). They have not received comprehensive treatment before, but since they represent saints in iconic poses, they provide a good corpus of icons comparable to icons in other media. Their durability and the difficulty of reworking them also makes them a particularly faithful record of Byzantine priorities regarding the icon as a genre. In addition, the dissertation surveys theological texts that comment on or illustrate stone to understand what role the materiality of Byzantine cameos played in choosing stone relief for icons. Finally, it examines Byzantine epigrams written about or for icons to define the terms that shaped icon production.
    [Show full text]
  • Analytical and Technological Study of Roman, Byzantine and Early Islamic (Umayyad) Glasses from Al-Fudein Archaeological Site, Jordan
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ZENODO Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry, Vol. 16, No 1,(2016), pp. 257-268 Copyright © 2016 MAA Open Access. Printed in Greece. All rights reserved. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.44776 ANALYTICAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL STUDY OF ROMAN, BYZANTINE AND EARLY ISLAMIC (UMAYYAD) GLASSES FROM AL-FUDEIN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE, JORDAN Khaled Al-Bashaireh1 and Elham Alama1 and Abdul Qader Al-Housan2 1Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Archaeology and Anthropology, Yarmouk University, Irbid 211-63, Jordan. 2Department of Antiquities of Al-Mafraq, Al-Mafraq, Jordan. Received: 12/11/2015 Accepted: 20/01/2016 Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT The study investigates the chemical composition and production technology of a set of thirty-nine glass samples from the archaeological site of Al-Fudein, northeast Jordan. The samples cover a long span of time dating back to the Roman, Byzantine and Early Islamic (Umayyad) periods. The X-Ray Fluorescence chemi- cal analyses revealed that the samples are soda-lime-silica natron based glasses. The majority of the samples are most probably of the Levantine type I glass, where the silica might come from the Syrian-Palestinian coast. Manganese and copper are the probable generators of the distinguished purple and turquoise colors. The high content of magnesia and potash of 4 Roman and 1 Umayyad samples might indicate the continuity of using plant ash fluxes in certain production centers during the Roman-Umayyad periods or pointing at a possible limited (but not documented before) inter-regional trade of Sasanian glass during the Roman peri- od.
    [Show full text]
  • Caf Ar 419 Glassblowing
    Calle Renier, Dorsoduro 3655 – 30125 Venezia tel. 041.296 0599 CAF AR 419 GLASSBLOWING INSTRUCTOR: Davide Penso [email protected] CLASS: every Tuesday from 3.00 pm to 7.00 pm (56 hours) SITE: Murano Isle COURSE DESCRIPTION The CFA AR 419 Glassblowing is a course that takes place on the Murano Isle, and it is an introduction to the real professional way to approach the torch and how to melt glass. During this course students learn about tools used for creating glass beads. Each student learns how to create his/her own bead and right out of his/her first jewelry, through the assistance and monitoring of the instructor. Each student is assigned a workstation equipped with its own workspace and torch. Each workspace has all the tools she/he needs, including: steel spindles or needles, safety glasses, pan pot of graphite, flat pliers to shape the glass, vermiculite to cool beads, etc. In addition, many glass rods of many different colors. The number of students per class is limited to 8. This allows the instructor a personalized evaluation, constant feedback and instructions. During the course, students will learn about tools for beads design and creation, most of glass fusion techniques, from the project to the professional production of the beads, designing jewelry, and strategy of sales. On the 3rd of December, students will visit the Glass Museum in Murano. In addition, the optional visit to the furnace where students can see Giancarlo Signoretto’s glass sculptures, on the 3rd or on the 10th of December. REQUIREMENTS For this course no requirements are asked.
    [Show full text]
  • Authentication
    AUTHENTICATION 1. LOGO Authentication starts with a logo. No logo, no Montici. True, Blow issued a limited number of mosaic pieces with no logo between the start of his mosaic career circa 1947 and the creation of the first Montici logo in 1951. But the odds are against finding such early pieces on the market. Pyramids and Dots On May 25, 1951, Blow registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark office his famous, classic black- and-white “two-triangle” logo, Blow had impeccable style and taste, right down to his choice of material for his tiny, signature logo. These original logos were made out of legendary Murano glass from Venice, called murino in Italian. Per Lastrucci, the glass came out of the fire in the form of aa tube; the tube was then sliced into individual logos. According to scholars, Venetians have been making glass for over 1,500 years, and on the Venetian island of Murano since the 13th century. In addition to the original 1951 Logo, Blow also created and used a second logo, a stylized letter “M” with a white dot on top. This dot logo was registered in Italy on Feb. 23, 1956. Why he created a second logo is an interesting story, shared with our sister Rosemary by maestro Bruno Lastrucci. At some point in the 1950s, the workshop ran out of logos, due to the exploding demand for Blow’s art pieces. While impatiently waiting for the reorder from Venice, Blow created the second logo to fill the gap. The simple dot ended up as a “cap” when translated into material.
    [Show full text]
  • TILE HERITAGE FOUNDATION U.S. Catalog Collection Catalog Order Form
    TILE HERITAGE FOUNDATION U.S. Catalog Collection Catalog Order Form To order one or more, first check the desired catalogs on the list below. Note the price of the catalog(s), then THF members may deduct 10% from the total (use code THF2014 online). Note that you may join Tile Heritage with a $45 tax-deductible donation. Add your local sales tax if or- dered from California and then add the appropriate shipping charge. Order online, fax your order with your credit card info, or make your check payable to Tile Heritage Foundation and mail with your list to Tile Heritage, P. O. Box 1850, Healdsburg, CA 95448. American Express, Discover, Visa and Mastercard are accepted. Simply supply us with the card number, expiration date and the name on the card. Do not email your credit card number. Order Form: U.S. Tile Catalog Reproductions Qty Catalog Price Total ____ Alhambra Tile Co: “Faience Arch Mantels.” $25 b&w ____ ____ Alhambra Tile Co: “Artistic Designs of Mantels.” $40 w/color ____ ____ American Encaustic: “Artistic Tiles” $40 w/color ____ ____ American Encaustic: “Ceramic Mosaic” (Cat. A) $75 color ____ ____ American Encaustic: “Lombardic Mosaic” $60 color ____ ____ American Encaustic: “Tile Design” $20 w/color ____ ____ American Encaustic: Aetcotype Accessories $75 color ____ ____ ATM: Arch. Monograph, No. 1. $15 w/color ____ ____ ATM: Arch. Monograph, No. 2. $15 w/color ____ ____ ATM: Arch. Monograph, No. 3. $15 w/color ____ ____ ATM: Arch. Monograph, No. 4. $15 w/color ____ ____ ATM: Arch. Monograph, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Fietra Dura, Also' Called Florentine Mosaic, Consists In
    MOSAIC AND PIETRA DURA. 429 qui site shading of the colors, the brilliant though softened effeot of the group of views, the atmosphere a~d sky of each mingling into the same ethereal tint, which relieved the eye and allowed it to rest with pleasure on the separate views: it was certainly a masterpiece. The author never left the Crystal Palace without passing by the table, which always excited fresh admiration. There. were two other mosaics, much laTger than the former, and different in style, that were remarkably fine specimens of workmam;hip: one was a copy of a celebrated picture, . by Guercino,-a St. John the Baptist; and the other a portrait of Pope Boniface the Second. A circular table, a square slab, and a picture represent­ ing a view of P:;estum, were likewise 'among the Roman mosaics in the London Exhibition. Dr. Chilton, of New York, has a beautiful Roman mosaic of the Pantheon, about three inches long. In the New York Exhibition, in 1853, the large pic­ ture of Pope Pia IX., in medallion size, was much ad­ mired. In the Paris Exhibition, in 1855, many large wOTksof Roman mosaics were exhibited; one in particular, belong­ ing to the Duke of Tuscany, required the constant work of fourteen years, and cost 700,000 francs. A large table in the rotU11da of the panorama, of rich and elegant Roman mosaic, cost 400.,000 ii'anes. The famous picture of the' Campo-vacino, in Rome, by Galand, cost the artist ten years' labor. Fietra dura, also' called Florentine mosaic, consists in the manufacture of hard stone inlaid in a slab of marble; they are, for the most part, of the quartz species, such as agates, jasper, chalcedony, carnelian, &c.; also, lapis lazuli, malachite, and aHsuch hard and colored minerals which, by their depth of color and brilliancy of lustre largely con· .
    [Show full text]
  • CERAMIC ART and EXPRESSION: EXPERIMENTING with MOSAIC ART by Paul Owusu Attakorah BA (Integrated Rural Art and Industry) a Thesi
    CERAMIC ART AND EXPRESSION: EXPERIMENTING WITH MOSAIC ART By Paul Owusu Attakorah BA (Integrated Rural Art and Industry) A Thesis submitted to the Department of Industrial Art, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF FINE ART (CERAMICS) College of Art and Built Environment © Department of Industrial Art June, 2015 i CERTIFICATION I hereby declare that this submission is my own work towards the MFA and that, to the best of my knowledge; it contains neither material previously published by another person nor material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree of the University, except where due acknowledgement has been made in the text. PAUL OWUSU ATTAKORAH ………………… …………… (PG 7278212) (STUDENT) SIGNATURE DATE Certified by: MR.ALBERT ASSUMAN ………………… …………. (SUPERVISOR) SIGNATURE DATE Certified by: DR. EBENEZER KOFI HOWARD ……………… ………… (HEAD OF DEPARTMENT) SIGNATURE DATE ii ABSTRACT Mosaic art has been practiced all over the world and generally in two dimensional forms. The main objective of this project is to depict Clay beads mosaic in a three dimensional form for better appreciation and artistic grandeur in clay medium. Inspired by the wisdom of the Egret bird, a design was developed to produce a thought- provoking piece titled “Wisdom Bead Mosaic”. This work was achieved through design thinking, systematic procedure and a tandem of artistic skills and studio practice. The materials used were clay, iron rods and binding wire. The nine (9) feet work provided stimuli among both artist and non-artist. It became evidently clear that mosaic art can be expressively executed in three dimensional and be a resource for beautifying the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Application for Mosaic Leadership Scholarship a Mosaic Is Anything Made up of Various and Unique Elements That Together Forms a Single Composite Whole
    Application for Mosaic Leadership Scholarship A mosaic is anything made up of various and unique elements that together forms a single composite whole. A mosaic consists of different textures, colors, shapes, and sizes–each one beautiful, valuable, and representing something that is an irreplaceable and essential part of the whole. Through the Mosaic Leadership Scholarship, North Park Theological Seminary (NPTS) supports the vision of the Evangelical Covenant Church (ECC) which values becoming a church that is anchored in the multi- cultural, multi-ethnic diversity of the kingdom of God. Mosaic Leadership Scholarships are designed to support leaders, with multi-cultural or multi-ethnic backgrounds, who desire to become further equipped through theological education, in order to strengthen the mosaic tapestry of the Church. Mosaic Leadership Scholarships recognize men and women who have demonstrated, through previous leadership (in ministry, community, career, civic, or pastoral contexts) the potential for significantly expanded and more effective work and ministry in the church and/or society. Mosaic Leadership Scholarships are offered to degree-seeking students as part of a financial aid award package. Financial aid awards assume a personal financial investment and the opportunity for the student to benefit from the Church Matching Grant program. Evangelical Covenant students applying for the Mosaic Leadership Scholarship may also be eligible to apply for a Presidential Scholarship. Mosaic Leadership Scholarships are offered to a limited
    [Show full text]
  • A Glass and Mosaic Family Legacy a Glass And
    SAMA News Featuring the latest from the Society of American Mosaic Artists A Glass and Mosaic Family Legacy J&R Lamb Studios, 1857 to present J&R Lamb Studios, Memory, Lakewood Memorial Chapel. A mosaic based on a painting by Ella Condie Lamb. Photo courtesy of Lakewood Cemetery. by Shawn Newton Frederick Stymetz Lamb, J&R Lamb Studios, Photos Shared by Permission of the Society of American Mosaic Religion Enthroned, 1900. Artists Photo by Dreamwalls Glass, © 2020. merica’s oldest, continuously run decorative arts company, J&R Lamb Studios, was famous as a stained glassmaker. It Apreceded the studios of both John La Farge and Louis C. Tiffany. 44 • Glass Art ® • November/December 2020 www.GlassArtMagazine.com Establishing a Tradition The J&R Lamb Studios was established in 1857 by brothers Joseph Lamb (1833–1898) and Richard Lamb (1836–1909) in New York City. Their parents, Joseph Lamb and Elizabeth Clark, were married in 1832 in Kent, England. Their father, a landscape architect, had been engaged to work on Niblo’s Garden in New York City, an exhibition hall and open-air theater. However, prior to im- migrating to the United States, Elizabeth died during childbirth and Joseph then passed away during the voyage. A sympathetic Scottish couple, Peter and Agnes Rennie, who were also making the journey to America, became the brothers’ foster parents. After receiving their education, Joseph and Richard formed J&R Lamb Studios and began to create mosaic and stained glass murals, monuments, and other work for churches, temples, residences, government, and academic institutions. The firm was chosen by the United States government as one of four studios to represent American achievements in stained glass at the Paris International Exposition of 1900.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacred Art, Crux Gemmata, and Marble Altar and Furnishings
    SACRED ART, CRUX GEMMATA, AND MARBLE ALTAR AND FURNISHINGS SACRED ART Sacred art in the Christ Cathedral features new work by prominent artists inspired by the life of Jesus Christ, who depict Him using modern iconography. The sacred art, by many internationally recognized artists, is designed to welcome worshippers into the presence of the Lord, introduce the communion of saints and the glory of Our Lady, the Blessed Mother, as well as to accompany us on our journey of faith inspired by the Holy Spirit. “The art in Christ Cathedral is both evocative and provocative, and evokes commentary. That’s when art is successful,” says Brother William Woeger, a member of the Sacred Art Commission. Brother Woeger is consulting on the art commissions and is one of the artists responsible for creating the Crux Gemmata (crucifix over the altar), altar candles, Paschal Candle, sanctuary lamps, reliquary (container for relics at the altar), and Dedication Candles. Pablo Eduardo, a Bolivian-born sculptor known for marrying his Spanish-American heritage with his art, designed the Narthex wall art, 14 Stations of the Cross, and the Festal Doors. Eduardo’s sculptures, rendered in bronze, are recognized for capturing a snapshot of artistic metamorphosis while celebrating rhythm, emotion, texture and tension. He is known for developing close relationships with his clients. Prior to the beginning of the project, he met with the Most Rev. Kevin W. Vann, Bishop of Orange, and Fr. Christopher Smith, Episcopal Vicar of Christ Cathedral, to understand their vision
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Tapestry
    Digital Tapestry ¾ ½ ½ Carsten Rother ½ Sanjiv Kumar Vladimir Kolmogorov Andrew Blake ¾ ½ Microsoft Research, Cambridge, UK Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA Abstract gions are potentially uninformative (grass in this case). In This paper addresses the novel problem of automatically a tapestry one would like to include as many salient regions synthesizing an output image from a large collection of dif- from different images in the collection as possible. Another ferent input images. The synthesized image, called a digital possible choice is to synthesize a tapestry through texture tapestry, can be viewed as a visual summary or a virtual synthesis. However, the traditional texture synthesis tech- ’thumbnail’ of all the images in the input collection. The niques, both parametric [16] as well as non-parametric [5] problem of creating the tapestry is cast as a multi-class la- address the problem of synthesizing a large texture image beling problem such that each region in the tapestry is con- given a small sample. Clearly, these will be insufficient to structed from input image blocks that are salient and such generate a rich structure in tapestry because of the variety that neighboring blocks satisfy spatial compatibility. This is of objects and textures contained in different input images. formulated using a Markov Random Field and optimized via Jojic et al. [7] recently proposed a generative framework the graph cut based expansion move algorithm. The stan- to obtain a condensed version of the input image called an dard expansion move algorithm can only handle energies epitome. An epitome contains the essence of the shape with metric terms, while our energy contains non-metric and appearance of the original image.
    [Show full text]
  • Twisted Ribbon Geometry and Design Researcher: Alex Klein PI: Jennifer Stager Antioch Recovery Project Johns Hopkins University Last Updated: May 2020
    Twisted Ribbon Geometry and Design Researcher: Alex Klein PI: Jennifer Stager Antioch Recovery Project Johns Hopkins University Last Updated: May 2020 Preface: Ongoing Research 2 1: Introduction 2 Antioch Mosaics 2 Border Patterns 3 Twisted Ribbon 4 2: Twisted Ribbon Corpus 5 Animal Friendship 5 Panel from the House of Ge and the Seasons 7 Unknown Hatay Mosaic 8 3. Ribbon Variations 9 Bird Rinceau 9 Meander Pattern Mosaic 12 Amerimnia ("Freedom from Care") 13 Peddler of Erotes 14 4. Twisted Geometry 15 Types of Twists 15 Drawing a “Waved Ribbon” 16 Phase Shift Variations 17 5. Function Fitting 19 Method 19 Data 20 Results 22 Conclusion 23 6. Color and Tiles 24 Twisted Ribbon Color Scheme 24 Animal Friendship Tile Recreations 25 Hatay Mosaic Tile Recreations 26 Similarities 27 7. Further Research 27 Preface: Ongoing Research This paper is written for the Antioch Recovery Project (http://www.antiochrecoveryproject.org), ​ ​ part of the Classics Research Lab at Johns Hopkins University. The entire project focuses on researching and conserving the set of approximately thirty Antioch Mosaics currently located in the Baltimore Museum of Art. The research into the ancient works of art has been an ongoing process since they were excavated in the 1930s, and so this paper aims to join the growing conversation. While I arrive at certain claims through my work, there is no “conclusion” to this topic. This paper serves as a journal surrounding my research into the Twisted Ribbon border pattern. I encourage others to add on or disagree with certain aspects, and perform similar studies to other design elements of the Antioch Mosaics.
    [Show full text]