Increased Expression of CELSR3 Indicates a Poor Prognostic Factor

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Increased Expression of CELSR3 Indicates a Poor Prognostic Factor Journal of Cancer 2021, Vol. 12 1115 Ivyspring International Publisher Journal of Cancer 2021; 12(4): 1115-1124. doi: 10.7150/jca.49567 Research Paper Increased expression of CELSR3 indicates a poor prognostic factor for Prostate Cancer Xuanrong Chen*, Qianwang Ma*, Yixi Liu*, Hanling Li, Zihao Liu, Zheng Zhang, Yuanjie Niu, Zhiqun Shang Department of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, The second hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300211, China. *These authors contributed equally to this work. Corresponding authors: Zhiqun Shang: [email protected] or Yuanjie Niu: [email protected] © The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions. Received: 2020.06.16; Accepted: 2020.11.19; Published: 2021.01.01 Abstract Background: Cadherin EGF LAG Seven-Pass G-Type Receptor 3 (CELSR3) gene was reported to be overexpressed in various human cancers and involved in the regulation of neurite-dependent neurite outgrowth and may play a role in tumor formation. However, the clinical significance of CELSR3 in prostate cancer (PCa) has not been fully studied. Methods: The expression of CELSR3 was detected by crossover analysis of the public datasets and cell lines. MTT assay and migration assay were performed to evaluate the cells’ physiological functioning. Co-expressed genes and enrichment analysis was performed to investigate the biological significance of CELSR3 in PCa. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was used to detect the expression levels of hub genes (CENPE, CENPA, CDC20, NUF2, ESPL1, PLK1) related to CELSR3. Results: We found a significant increase in CELSR3 expression in PCa patients and cell lines. Furthermore, immunohistochemical analysis showed that CELSR3 protein expression was significantly more highly expressed in the PCa tissues compared to the non-cancerous PCa tissues. CELSR3 downregulation significantly suppressed cell proliferation and migration potential. CELSR3-related hub genes (CENPE, CENPA, CDC20, NUF2, ESPL1, PLK1) were selected and the functions of these hub genes showed that the function of CELSR3 was closely related to the cell cycle-related signaling pathways. The upregulation of CELSR3 mRNA expression in the PCa tissues significantly correlated with the presence of high serum PSA levels, high pathological stage, high Gleason score, short overall survival time and short disease-free survival time. Conclusion: Our data suggest that CELSR3 may play an important role in the progression of PCa. More importantly, an increase in CELSR3 expression may be indicative of poor disease-free survival and poor prognosis in PCa patients. Key words: Prostate cancer; flamingo subfamily; prognostic factor; Bioinformatics Introduction Prostate cancer (PCa) has become the second gene expression databases and profiles for prostate most common cancer in men, and both morbidity and cancer established using microarray and sequencing mortality are on the rise in recent years[1]. As a technology[3]. Cumulative evidence suggests that heterogeneous disease, the occurrence of PCa may be multiple genes and signalling pathways are involved affected by multiple factors such as genes, cellular in the carcinogenesis, progression, and recurrence of context, and environment[2]. Gene expression PCa. However, its tumor-related mechanisms have profiling using high-throughput platforms is not been fully clarified. Therefore, it is crucial to increasingly used as an effective tool for analysing identify efficient biomarkers to better predict the tumor progression mechanisms. There are a variety of diagnosis and prognosis of PCa. http://www.jcancer.org Journal of Cancer 2021, Vol. 12 1116 Cadherin EGF LAG seven-pass G-type receptors datasets and used to conduct the analysis[3, 15, 16]. 1, 2 and 3 (CELSR1-3) constitute three atypical The main parameters of the public datasets were cadherin families with multiple functions in epithelial summarized in Table 1. For prostate cancer specimen, cells and the nervous system[4, 5]. As we know, CELSR3 antibody (Atlas Antibodies, Cat#HPA062866, cadherin is a calcium-dependent transmembrane RRID: AB_2684886) was used. Immunohistochemical glycoprotein that is typically characterized by an staining of human PCa cells shows moderate extracellular calcium binding domain that plays an cytoplasmic or membranous positivity in the luminal important role in embryonic development and cancer cells in the Human Protein Atlas database [17, synapse formation[6]. CELSR3 is an important 18]. signaling molecule in the INT-1/planar cell polarity (WNT/PCP) pathway, and this pathway is involved Table 1. The main parameters of the public datasets. in controlling tissue polarity and cell migration[7]. According to reports, the CELSR3 gene is Dataset Characteristic Reference the MSKCC 218 prostate tumors with 181 primaries tumors and 37 [3] overexpressed in various human cancers, including dataset metastases tumors brain tumors, ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer, liver the PRAD 497 primary prostate cancer samples with mRNA and [16] dataset clinicopathological characteristics* cancer, colorectal cancer and cervical cancer[8-11]. the PCTA 1,321 clinical specimens from 38 PCa cohorts [15] CELSR3 was specifically expressed in adult brain dataset *, the PRAD dataset refers to the Prostate Adenocarcinoma (TCGA, TCGA tumors. Erkan et al. showed that CELSR3 was Provisional) dataset. selectively up-regulated in the stellate cells of liver and pancreas cancer[11]. Asad et al. found that CELSR3 was expressed more strongly in Stem-A than Cell culture and transfection non-Stem-A ovarian cancer and that CELSR3 might The BPH1, LNCaP, C42, 22RV1 cell lines were promote Stem-A ovarian cancer invasiveness by obtained from the American Type Culture Collection regulating cell proliferation and cell cycle progression (ATCC) and grown in RPMI 1640 (Gibco, through a non-canonical Wnt/PCP pathway[8]. ThermoFisher, USA) supplemented with 10% Fetal Through ceRNA network analysis, Pan et al. bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco, ThermoFisher, USA) in demonstrated that CELSR3 was a prognostic gene for 5% CO2 at 37°C. CELSR3 silencing was performed the overall survival of head and neck squamous cell using two custom made siRNAs targeting CELSR3 carcinoma[12]. Gu et al. showed that CELSR3 mRNA mRNA region (siCELSR3 #1 sense: GCAAUAGCC was an independent prognostic factor for the overall GUGGACACUUTT, siCELSR3 #1 antisense: survival of hepatocellular carcinoma patients[13]. AAGUGUCCACGGCUAUUGCTT and siCELSR3 #2 Gene set enrichment analysis revealed that a high sense: CCAGUACACUUUCCAGAAUTT, siCELSR3 CELSR3 mRNA expression phenotype related to #2 antisense: AUUCUGGAAAGUGUACUGGTT) somatic diversification of immune receptors, and one scramble control siRNA (Genepharma, endonuclease activity, DNA repair complex, and China) and transfected by Lipofectamine™ 3000 somatic cell DNA recombination[13, 14]. In all, Transfection Reagent followed the manufacturer’s CELSR3 was found to be an oncogene that promoted instructions. malignant progression of the tumor. However, the RNA extraction and Quantitative RT-PCR clinical value and role of CELSR3 in PCa has not been analysis fully elucidated. In this study, we found that high expression of Total RNA was isolated from cells using TRIzol CELSR3 may be a potentially effective biomarker for reagent (Invitrogen, USA) according to the PCa. Cox proportional hazards regression model manufacturer's instructions. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis showed that increased expression of CELSR3 (qRT-PCR) was performed on an ABI 7900 96 HT is closely related to the clinical pathology of PCa. This Series PCR Instrument (Applied Biosystem, expression pattern of CELSR3 can be used as a ThermoFisher, USA) using FastStart Universal SYBR prognostic biomarker and is associated with poor Green Master (ROX) (Roche, Sigma-Aldrich). Gene prognosis in patients with prostate cancer. expression levels were determined by the Ct method and further normalized to GAPDH levels. The Materials and Methods sequences of the primers used were listed in Table S1. Public datasets and immunohistochemistry Cell growth assay analysis Cell growth was monitored by the The clinical information and expression profiles 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphe-nyltetrazolium were obtained from the MSKCC, PRAD, and PCTA bromide proliferation assay. 22RV1 cells were seeded http://www.jcancer.org Journal of Cancer 2021, Vol. 12 1117 into a 96-well plate at a density of 2000 cells per well. Results After for 24 hours of incubation, cell proliferation ability was evaluated every 24 hours for three Increased expression of CELSR3 in human PCa consecutive days. Each experiment was performed in tissues triplicate and repeated at least three times. Previous studies have reported that the atypical cadherin family was critical in the development and Transwell migration assay progression of tumors [7]. First, we investigated the For migration detection, 100 ul of 1640 medium CELSR3 gene expression profiles in the PCTA dataset containing 2 × 104 cells were added to the upper (Figure 1A and 1B). We confirmed that CELSR3 was chamber of a 24-well plate, and 500 μl of 1640 medium significantly upregulated in PCa (primary PCa and containing 20% FBS was supplemented in the lower metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer) when chamber. After incubating for 48 hours in a 37 ° C compared to benign
Recommended publications
  • Celsr1-3 Cadherins in PCP and Brain Development
    CHAPTER SEVEN Celsr1–3 Cadherins in PCP and Brain Development Camille Boutin, André M. Goffinet1, Fadel Tissir1 Institute of Neuroscience, Developmental Neurobiology, Universite´ Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium 1Corresponding authors: Equal contribution. e-mail address: [email protected]; andre. [email protected] Contents 1. Celsr1–3 Expression Patterns 164 2. Celsr1: A Major Player in Vertebrate PCP 165 3. Celsr2 and 3 in Ciliogenesis 169 4. Celsr1–3 in Neuronal Migration 171 5. Celsr2 and Celsr3 in Brain Wiring 174 5.1 Motifs of Celsr important for their functions 176 References 179 Abstract Cadherin EGF LAG seven-pass G-type receptors 1, 2, and 3 (Celsr1–3) form a family of three atypical cadherins with multiple functions in epithelia and in the nervous system. During the past decade, evidence has accumulated for important and distinct roles of Celsr1–3 in planar cell polarity (PCP) and brain development and maintenance. Although the role of Celsr in PCP is conserved from flies to mammals, other functions may be more distantly related, with Celsr working only with one or a subset of the classical PCP partners. Here, we review the literature on Celsr in PCP and neural devel- opment, point to several remaining questions, and consider future challenges and possible research trends. Celsr1–3 genes encode atypical cadherins of more than 3000 amino acids ( Fig. 7.1). Their large ectodomain is composed of nine N-terminal cadherin repeats (typical cadherins have five repeats), six epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like domains, two laminin G repeats, one hormone receptor motif (HRM), and a G-protein-coupled receptor proteolytic site (GPS).
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Evidence That Celsr3 and Celsr2, Together with Fzd3, Regulate Forebrain Wiring in a Vangl-Independent Manner
    Genetic evidence that Celsr3 and Celsr2, together with Fzd3, regulate forebrain wiring in a Vangl-independent manner Yibo Qua, Yuhua Huanga, Jia Fenga, Gonzalo Alvarez-Boladob, Elizabeth A. Grovec, Yingzi Yangd, Fadel Tissire, Libing Zhoua,f,1,2, and Andre M. Goffinete,1,2 aGuangdong–Hong Kong–Macau Institute of CNS Regeneration, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China; bDepartment of Neuroanatomy, Heidelberg University, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany; cNeuroscience, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637; dNational Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892; eWELBIO - Walloon Excellence in Life Sciences and Biotechnology and Institute of Neuroscience, University of Louvain, B1200 Brussels, Belgium; and fState Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Edited* by Jeremy Nathans, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, and approved June 18, 2014 (received for review February 3, 2014) Celsr3 and Fzd3, members of “core planar cell polarity” (PCP) AC contains commissural axons from the anterior olfactory nu- genes, were shown previously to control forebrain axon guidance clei and from the temporal cortex, which cross the midline at and wiring by acting in axons and/or guidepost cells. Here, we embryonic day 13.5 (E13.5) to E14.5 (11–14). The IC contains show that Celsr2 acts redundantly with Celsr3, and that their com- three main axonal components. Thalamocortical axons (TCA) bined mutation mimics that of Fzd3. The phenotypes generated emerge from the thalamus—formerly called “dorsal” thalamus upon inactivation of Fzd3 in different forebrain compartments are (15)—at E12.5. They run through the prethalamus (former similar to those in conditional Celsr2-3 mutants, indicating that “ventral” thalamus), turn and cross the diencephalon–telen- Fzd3 and Celsr2-3 act in the same population of cells.
    [Show full text]
  • G Protein-Coupled Receptors
    S.P.H. Alexander et al. The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16: G protein-coupled receptors. British Journal of Pharmacology (2015) 172, 5744–5869 THE CONCISE GUIDE TO PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16: G protein-coupled receptors Stephen PH Alexander1, Anthony P Davenport2, Eamonn Kelly3, Neil Marrion3, John A Peters4, Helen E Benson5, Elena Faccenda5, Adam J Pawson5, Joanna L Sharman5, Christopher Southan5, Jamie A Davies5 and CGTP Collaborators 1School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK, 2Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK, 3School of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK, 4Neuroscience Division, Medical Education Institute, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK, 5Centre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK Abstract The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16 provides concise overviews of the key properties of over 1750 human drug targets with their pharmacology, plus links to an open access knowledgebase of drug targets and their ligands (www.guidetopharmacology.org), which provides more detailed views of target and ligand properties. The full contents can be found at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ 10.1111/bph.13348/full. G protein-coupled receptors are one of the eight major pharmacological targets into which the Guide is divided, with the others being: ligand-gated ion channels, voltage-gated ion channels, other ion channels, nuclear hormone receptors, catalytic receptors, enzymes and transporters. These are presented with nomenclature guidance and summary information on the best available pharmacological tools, alongside key references and suggestions for further reading.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Functionality of Proteins Involved in GPCR and G Protein Signaling: Making Sense of Structure–Function Continuum with In
    Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (2019) 76:4461–4492 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-019-03276-1 Cellular andMolecular Life Sciences REVIEW Multi‑functionality of proteins involved in GPCR and G protein signaling: making sense of structure–function continuum with intrinsic disorder‑based proteoforms Alexander V. Fonin1 · April L. Darling2 · Irina M. Kuznetsova1 · Konstantin K. Turoverov1,3 · Vladimir N. Uversky2,4 Received: 5 August 2019 / Revised: 5 August 2019 / Accepted: 12 August 2019 / Published online: 19 August 2019 © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 Abstract GPCR–G protein signaling system recognizes a multitude of extracellular ligands and triggers a variety of intracellular signal- ing cascades in response. In humans, this system includes more than 800 various GPCRs and a large set of heterotrimeric G proteins. Complexity of this system goes far beyond a multitude of pair-wise ligand–GPCR and GPCR–G protein interactions. In fact, one GPCR can recognize more than one extracellular signal and interact with more than one G protein. Furthermore, one ligand can activate more than one GPCR, and multiple GPCRs can couple to the same G protein. This defnes an intricate multifunctionality of this important signaling system. Here, we show that the multifunctionality of GPCR–G protein system represents an illustrative example of the protein structure–function continuum, where structures of the involved proteins represent a complex mosaic of diferently folded regions (foldons, non-foldons, unfoldons, semi-foldons, and inducible foldons). The functionality of resulting highly dynamic conformational ensembles is fne-tuned by various post-translational modifcations and alternative splicing, and such ensembles can undergo dramatic changes at interaction with their specifc partners.
    [Show full text]
  • G Protein‐Coupled Receptors
    S.P.H. Alexander et al. The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20: G protein-coupled receptors. British Journal of Pharmacology (2019) 176, S21–S141 THE CONCISE GUIDE TO PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20: G protein-coupled receptors Stephen PH Alexander1 , Arthur Christopoulos2 , Anthony P Davenport3 , Eamonn Kelly4, Alistair Mathie5 , John A Peters6 , Emma L Veale5 ,JaneFArmstrong7 , Elena Faccenda7 ,SimonDHarding7 ,AdamJPawson7 , Joanna L Sharman7 , Christopher Southan7 , Jamie A Davies7 and CGTP Collaborators 1School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK 2Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Department of Pharmacology, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia 3Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK 4School of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK 5Medway School of Pharmacy, The Universities of Greenwich and Kent at Medway, Anson Building, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Chatham, Kent, ME4 4TB, UK 6Neuroscience Division, Medical Education Institute, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK 7Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK Abstract The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20 is the fourth in this series of biennial publications. The Concise Guide provides concise overviews of the key properties of nearly 1800 human drug targets with an emphasis on selective pharmacology (where available), plus links to the open access knowledgebase source of drug targets and their ligands (www.guidetopharmacology.org), which provides more detailed views of target and ligand properties. Although the Concise Guide represents approximately 400 pages, the material presented is substantially reduced compared to information and links presented on the website.
    [Show full text]
  • Dystroglycan Is a Scaffold for Extracellular Axon Guidance Decisions L Bailey Lindenmaier1, Nicolas Parmentier2, Caiying Guo3, Fadel Tissir2, Kevin M Wright1*
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Dystroglycan is a scaffold for extracellular axon guidance decisions L Bailey Lindenmaier1, Nicolas Parmentier2, Caiying Guo3, Fadel Tissir2, Kevin M Wright1* 1Vollum Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, United States; 2Institiute of Neuroscience, Universite´ Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; 3Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States Abstract Axon guidance requires interactions between extracellular signaling molecules and transmembrane receptors, but how appropriate context-dependent decisions are coordinated outside the cell remains unclear. Here we show that the transmembrane glycoprotein Dystroglycan interacts with a changing set of environmental cues that regulate the trajectories of extending axons throughout the mammalian brain and spinal cord. Dystroglycan operates primarily as an extracellular scaffold during axon guidance, as it functions non-cell autonomously and does not require signaling through its intracellular domain. We identify the transmembrane receptor Celsr3/ Adgrc3 as a binding partner for Dystroglycan, and show that this interaction is critical for specific axon guidance events in vivo. These findings establish Dystroglycan as a multifunctional scaffold that coordinates extracellular matrix proteins, secreted cues, and transmembrane receptors to regulate axon guidance. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42143.001 Introduction During neural circuit development, extending axons encounter distinct combinations of cues and *For correspondence: growth substrates that guide their trajectory. These cues can be attractive or repulsive, secreted [email protected] and/or anchored to cell membranes, and signal through cell surface receptors on the growth cones of axons (Kolodkin and Tessier-Lavigne, 2011). Receptors also recognize permissive and non-per- Competing interest: See missive growth substrates formed by the extracellular matrix (ECM), surrounding cells, and other page 21 axons (Raper and Mason, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Epigenetic Mechanisms Are Involved in the Oncogenic Properties of ZNF518B in Colorectal Cancer
    Epigenetic mechanisms are involved in the oncogenic properties of ZNF518B in colorectal cancer Francisco Gimeno-Valiente, Ángela L. Riffo-Campos, Luis Torres, Noelia Tarazona, Valentina Gambardella, Andrés Cervantes, Gerardo López-Rodas, Luis Franco and Josefa Castillo SUPPLEMENTARY METHODS 1. Selection of genomic sequences for ChIP analysis To select the sequences for ChIP analysis in the five putative target genes, namely, PADI3, ZDHHC2, RGS4, EFNA5 and KAT2B, the genomic region corresponding to the gene was downloaded from Ensembl. Then, zoom was applied to see in detail the promoter, enhancers and regulatory sequences. The details for HCT116 cells were then recovered and the target sequences for factor binding examined. Obviously, there are not data for ZNF518B, but special attention was paid to the target sequences of other zinc-finger containing factors. Finally, the regions that may putatively bind ZNF518B were selected and primers defining amplicons spanning such sequences were searched out. Supplementary Figure S3 gives the location of the amplicons used in each gene. 2. Obtaining the raw data and generating the BAM files for in silico analysis of the effects of EHMT2 and EZH2 silencing The data of siEZH2 (SRR6384524), siG9a (SRR6384526) and siNon-target (SRR6384521) in HCT116 cell line, were downloaded from SRA (Bioproject PRJNA422822, https://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/), using SRA-tolkit (https://ncbi.github.io/sra-tools/). All data correspond to RNAseq single end. doBasics = TRUE doAll = FALSE $ fastq-dump -I --split-files SRR6384524 Data quality was checked using the software fastqc (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham. ac.uk /projects/fastqc/). The first low quality removing nucleotides were removed using FASTX- Toolkit (http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastxtoolkit/).
    [Show full text]
  • Expression Map of 78 Brain-Expressed Mouse Orphan Gpcrs Provides a Translational Resource for Neuropsychiatric Research
    ARTICLE DOI: 10.1038/s42003-018-0106-7 OPEN Expression map of 78 brain-expressed mouse orphan GPCRs provides a translational resource for neuropsychiatric research Aliza T. Ehrlich1,2, Grégoire Maroteaux2,5, Anne Robe1, Lydie Venteo3, Md. Taufiq Nasseef2, 1234567890():,; Leon C. van Kempen4,6, Naguib Mechawar2, Gustavo Turecki2, Emmanuel Darcq2 & Brigitte L. Kieffer 1,2 Orphan G-protein-coupled receptors (oGPCRs) possess untapped potential for drug dis- covery. In the brain, oGPCRs are generally expressed at low abundance and their function is understudied. Expression profiling is an essential step to position oGPCRs in brain function and disease, however public databases provide only partial information. Here, we fine-map expression of 78 brain-oGPCRs in the mouse, using customized probes in both standard and supersensitive in situ hybridization. Images are available at http://ogpcr-neuromap.douglas. qc.ca. This searchable database contains over 8000 coronal brain sections across 1350 slides, providing the first public mapping resource dedicated to oGPCRs. Analysis with public mouse (60 oGPCRs) and human (56 oGPCRs) genome-wide datasets identifies 25 oGPCRs with potential to address emotional and/or cognitive dimensions of psychiatric conditions. We probe their expression in postmortem human brains using nanoString, and included data in the resource. Correlating human with mouse datasets reveals excellent suitability of mouse models for oGPCRs in neuropsychiatric research. 1 IGBMC, Institut Génétique Biologie Moléculaire Cellulaire, Illkirch, France. 2 Douglas Mental Health University Institute and McGill University, Department of Psychiatry, Montreal, Canada. 3 Label Histologie, 51100 Reims, France. 4 Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital and McGill University, Department of Pathology, Montreal, Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Material
    Supplemental material Systems Pharmacology Approach to Prevent Retinal Degeneration in Stargardt Disease Yu Chen, Grazyna Palczewska, Debarshi Mustafi, Marcin Golczak, Zhiqian Dong, Osamu Sawada, Tadao Maeda, Akiko Maeda, and Krzysztof Palczewski Table of Contents: 1. Supplemental Table 1. 2. Supplemental Table 2. 3. Supplemental Table 3. 4. References. 1 Supplemental Table 1. Expression of GPCRs in the eye and retina of C57BL/6J mice and the retina of a human donor eye (normalized FPKM values)A. Genes B6 mouse B6 mouse Human retina eye retina Rho 6162.04 11630.18 6896.09 Rgr 355.74 97.66 123.98 Opn1sw 125.13 198.54 31.69 Drd4 93.84 241.78 139.49 Opn1mw 62.97 95.77 172.56 Gprc5b 29.82 12.95 22.85 Gpr162 29.37 73.32 46.29 Gpr37 28.47 41.28 66.65 Ednrb 22.27 1.94 5.77 Rorb 21.69 23.52 24.31 Gpr153 20.42 37.18 15.31 Gabbr1 19.78 40.24 35.38 Rrh 19.29 9.23 40.34 2 Gpr152 18.55 40.46 3.05 Adora1 16.20 18.26 13.55 Lphn1 15.98 29.73 31.85 Tm2d1 15.56 10.31 17.63 Cxcr7 14.30 3.58 2.37 Ppard 13.68 19.37 21.61 Agtrap 13.64 17.21 8.18 Cd97 12.93 1.77 1.55 Gpr19 12.21 8.45 1.11 Fzd1 11.99 3.29 7.35 Fzd6 11.34 1.85 2.76 Gpr87 11.34 0.04 0.00 Lgr4 11.09 9.50 18.07 Drd2 10.82 23.10 26.33 Smo 10.75 6.35 5.91 S1pr1 10.66 11.21 11.78 Bai1 10.08 27.10 10.82 3 Glp2r 9.94 34.85 0.31 Ptger1 9.59 14.88 0.94 Gpr124 9.56 8.94 19.82 F2r 9.31 5.32 0.15 Adra2c 8.96 7.17 2.38 Gpr146 8.91 7.49 6.17 Vipr2 8.79 14.33 10.69 Fzd5 8.69 10.01 7.73 Gpr110 8.59 0.08 0.02 Adrb1 8.43 20.18 3.84 S1pr3 8.42 6.95 3.56 Gabbr2 7.80 17.03 10.57 Lphn2 7.66 9.02 8.79 Lpar1 7.47 0.91
    [Show full text]
  • Peripheral Nerve Single-Cell Analysis Identifies Mesenchymal Ligands That Promote Axonal Growth
    Research Article: New Research Development Peripheral Nerve Single-Cell Analysis Identifies Mesenchymal Ligands that Promote Axonal Growth Jeremy S. Toma,1 Konstantina Karamboulas,1,ª Matthew J. Carr,1,2,ª Adelaida Kolaj,1,3 Scott A. Yuzwa,1 Neemat Mahmud,1,3 Mekayla A. Storer,1 David R. Kaplan,1,2,4 and Freda D. Miller1,2,3,4 https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0066-20.2020 1Program in Neurosciences and Mental Health, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada, 2Institute of Medical Sciences University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1A8, Canada, 3Department of Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1A8, Canada, and 4Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1A8, Canada Abstract Peripheral nerves provide a supportive growth environment for developing and regenerating axons and are es- sential for maintenance and repair of many non-neural tissues. This capacity has largely been ascribed to paracrine factors secreted by nerve-resident Schwann cells. Here, we used single-cell transcriptional profiling to identify ligands made by different injured rodent nerve cell types and have combined this with cell-surface mass spectrometry to computationally model potential paracrine interactions with peripheral neurons. These analyses show that peripheral nerves make many ligands predicted to act on peripheral and CNS neurons, in- cluding known and previously uncharacterized ligands. While Schwann cells are an important ligand source within injured nerves, more than half of the predicted ligands are made by nerve-resident mesenchymal cells, including the endoneurial cells most closely associated with peripheral axons. At least three of these mesen- chymal ligands, ANGPT1, CCL11, and VEGFC, promote growth when locally applied on sympathetic axons.
    [Show full text]
  • Autocrine IFN Signaling Inducing Profibrotic Fibroblast Responses By
    Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on September 23, 2021 Inducing is online at: average * The Journal of Immunology , 11 of which you can access for free at: 2013; 191:2956-2966; Prepublished online 16 from submission to initial decision 4 weeks from acceptance to publication August 2013; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1300376 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/191/6/2956 A Synthetic TLR3 Ligand Mitigates Profibrotic Fibroblast Responses by Autocrine IFN Signaling Feng Fang, Kohtaro Ooka, Xiaoyong Sun, Ruchi Shah, Swati Bhattacharyya, Jun Wei and John Varga J Immunol cites 49 articles Submit online. Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists ? is published twice each month by Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts http://jimmunol.org/subscription Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html http://www.jimmunol.org/content/suppl/2013/08/20/jimmunol.130037 6.DC1 This article http://www.jimmunol.org/content/191/6/2956.full#ref-list-1 Information about subscribing to The JI No Triage! Fast Publication! Rapid Reviews! 30 days* Why • • • Material References Permissions Email Alerts Subscription Supplementary The Journal of Immunology The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2013 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. This information is current as of September 23, 2021. The Journal of Immunology A Synthetic TLR3 Ligand Mitigates Profibrotic Fibroblast Responses by Inducing Autocrine IFN Signaling Feng Fang,* Kohtaro Ooka,* Xiaoyong Sun,† Ruchi Shah,* Swati Bhattacharyya,* Jun Wei,* and John Varga* Activation of TLR3 by exogenous microbial ligands or endogenous injury-associated ligands leads to production of type I IFN.
    [Show full text]
  • Feedback Regulation of Apical Progenitor Fate by Immature Neurons Through Wnt7–Celsr3–Fzd3 Signalling
    ARTICLE Received 24 Jul 2015 | Accepted 3 Feb 2016 | Published 4 Mar 2016 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10936 OPEN Feedback regulation of apical progenitor fate by immature neurons through Wnt7–Celsr3–Fzd3 signalling Wei Wang1,w, Yves Jossin1, Guoliang Chai1, Wen-Hui Lien2, Fadel Tissir1,* & Andre M. Goffinet1,3,* Sequential generation of neurons and glial cells during development is critical for the wiring and function of the cerebral cortex. This process requires accurate coordination of neural progenitor cell (NPC) fate decisions, by NPC-autonomous mechanisms as well as by negative feedback from neurons. Here, we show that neurogenesis is protracted and gliogenesis decreased in mice with mutations of genes Celsr3 and Fzd3. This phenotype is not due to gene inactivation in progenitors, but rather in immature cortical neurons. Mutant neurons are unable to upregulate expression of Jag1 in response to cortical Wnt7, resulting in blunted activation of Notch signalling in NPC. Thus, Celsr3 and Fzd3 enable immature neurons to respond to Wnt7, upregulate Jag1 and thereby facilitate feedback signals that tune the timing of NPC fate decisions via Notch activation. 1 Universite´ catholique de Louvain, Institute of Neuroscience, 73 Avenue Mounier, Box B1.7316, 1200 Brussels, Belgium. 2 Universite´ catholique de Louvain, de Duve Institute, Avenue Hippocrate 74, Box B1.74.09, 1200 Brussels, Belgium. 3 WELBIO, 6 Avenue Pasteur, 1300 Wavre, Belgium. w Present address: Key Laboratory for Molecular and Developmental Biology, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China. * These authors contributed equally to this work. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to F.T.
    [Show full text]