DOCSLIB.ORG

Debate on 19Th June: Britishness

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Debate on 19Th June: Britishness Debate on 19th June: Britishness This Library Note aims to provide background information for the debate to be held on Thursday 19th June: “To call attention to the concept of Britishness in the context of the cultural, historical, constitutional and ethical tradition of the peoples of these islands” This Note provides an overview of the various debates that have taken place on the concept of Britishness. These include historical accounts, current commentaries and research into public attitudes. The Note also considers various Government proposals regarding British citizenship, shared values and rights and responsibilities, along with reaction to these proposals. Ian Cruse 16th June 2008 LLN 2008/015 House of Lords Library Notes are compiled for the benefit of Members of Parliament and their personal staff. Authors are available to discuss the contents of the Notes with the Members and their staff but cannot advise members of the general public. Any comments on Library Notes should be sent to the Head of Research Services, House of Lords Library, London SW1A 0PW or emailed to [email protected]. Table of Contents 1. The Backdrop to Debates on Britishness, National Identity and Citizenship ................ 1 1.1 The Concept of National Identity ............................................................................. 1 1.2 Britishness as a Historical Phenomenon ................................................................. 1 1.3 Britishness as a Social and Legal Construct—British Citizenship ........................... 2 1.4 Views of Britishness as a Current National Identity................................................. 2 1.5 Multiculturalism and Britishness .............................................................................. 4 1.6 The Decline of Britishness?..................................................................................... 5 2. Recent Debates on the Future of Britishness ............................................................... 6 2.1 The Fabian Society—The Future of Britishness...................................................... 6 2.2 Prospect—Britain Rediscovered.............................................................................. 7 2.3 Gordon Brown at the Fabian Society: The Future of Britishness ............................ 7 2.4 House of Lords Debate on British Identity and Citizenship ..................................... 8 2.5 Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR)—Who Are We? Identities in Britain..... 9 2.6 Ruth Kelly and Liam Byrne: A Common Place ........................................................ 9 2.7 David Cameron: Stronger Together ...................................................................... 10 2.8 Lord Baker’s Proposal for a Museum of Britishness.............................................. 11 2.9 Gordon Brown: We Must Defend the Union .......................................................... 11 3. Polling Data on Britishness and British Values ........................................................... 11 3.1 IPSOS MORI—Race No Barrier to Britishness (May 2002) .................................. 12 3.2 British Social Attitudes Survey—Dimensions of Being British (2004).................... 12 3.3 YouGOV/Telegraph—Britishness (July 2005) ....................................................... 13 3.4 Commission for Racial Equality—Race Relations 2006: A Research Study......... 13 3.5 British Social Attitudes Survey—The Regional Nature of Britishness (2007)........ 14 3.6 Camelot Foundation—Young People and British Identity (June 2007) ................. 14 3.7 BBC Asian Network—Young Asians and Britishness (July 2007)......................... 15 4. Government Policy...................................................................................................... 15 4.1 Citizenship Education ............................................................................................ 15 4.2 Citizenship Ceremonies and Life in the UK Tests ................................................. 16 4.3 Commission on Integration and Cohesion............................................................. 16 4.4 The Governance of Britain Green Paper ............................................................... 17 4.5 The Path to Citizenship ......................................................................................... 18 4.6 Youth Citizenship Commission.............................................................................. 18 4.7 Lord Goldsmith’s Review of Citizenship ................................................................ 18 4.8 The Flying of the Union Flag ................................................................................. 19 4.9 A Bill of Rights and Responsibilities and A Statement of British Values ............... 19 5. Reaction to Government Policies and Proposals........................................................ 19 5.1 Citizenship Education ............................................................................................ 19 5.2 The Governance of Britain Green Paper ............................................................... 20 5.3 A British Bill of Rights and Responsibilities ........................................................... 20 5.4 The Path to Citizenship ......................................................................................... 21 1. The Backdrop to Debates on Britishness, National Identity and Citizenship 1.1 The Concept of National Identity Historians and social scientists have considered at length what constitutes national identity. A full overview of the concept and the many debates it has engendered are beyond the scope of this paper. However, there are some general themes that can be mapped out. A number of early writers, such as Johann Gottlieb Fichte and Gottfried Herder, argued for a cultural definition of national identity based on the primordial ties of language and the notion of national culture as a living energy not imposed from above.1 Writers such as Ernest Gellner, suggested that though elements of pre-existing culture were not unimportant, national identity was more a product of state formation, industrialisation and modernity and hence a product of the 18th and 19th centuries.2 Other writers, such as Eric Hobsbawm and Bendict Anderson, have argued that the concept of nation and national identity is essentially a socially engineered construct with elements of invented and imagined traditions.3 This latter approach also emphasised the importance of social phenomena, such as class. More recently, academics have sought to cast national identity as one of a number of ‘multiple’ or ‘fractured’ identities, mediated by other issues such as race, gender, ethnicity and religion and globalisation.4 The latter approach suggests that national identity could be experienced differently according to one’s social characteristics. Many accounts, however, offer a synthesis of some of these approaches. For instance, Anthony D. Smith suggests that national identity is the result of the interaction of the ethnic past and the forces of modernity.5 This approach has allowed social scientists to identify different types of national identity—civic and ethnic. Civic national identity refers to residence, shared political values, common civic institutions and shared language, whereas ethnic national identity is seen as being related to ancestry and emersion in national customs and traditions. 1.2 Britishness as a Historical Phenomenon The concept of Britishness has been the source of some recent debate amongst historians. Some commentators have noted that the study of Britishness as a distinct national identity is complicated by the fact that many accounts tend to conflate Britishness with Englishness, and often treat English events and trends as though they were synonymous with British developments.6 However, a number of historians have charted the development of Britishness as a distinct national identity. Linda Colley argues that Britain was an invented nation “heavily dependent for its raison d’etre on a broadly Protestant culture, on the threat and tonic of recurrent war, especially war with France, and on the triumphs, profits, and ‘otherness’ represented by a massive overseas 1 See Paul Lawrence, Nationalism: History and Theory, (2005), p. 4, and James McKay, ‘An Exploratory Synthesis of Primordial and Mobilisationist Approaches to Ethnic Phenomena’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, vol. 5 no. 4, (1982), p. 395–420. 2 Ernest Gellner, Nations and Nationalism, (1983). 3 For example, see Eric Hobsbawn, Nations and Nationalism Since 1780, (1992) and Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities, (1991). 4 See for instance Paul Lawrence, Nationalism: History and Theory, (2005), p. 198–206; Harriet Bradley, Fractured Identities: Changing Patterns of Inequality, (1997); Mattei Dogan, ‘The Decline of Nationalisms within Western Europe’,Comparative Politics, vol. 26, no. 3 (April, 1994), pp. 281– 305. 5 See Anthony D. Smith ‘Gastronomy or geology? The role of nationalism in the reconstruction of nations’. Nations and Nationalism, vol. 1, no. 1, (1994), pp. 3–23. 6 See for instance Linda Colley, ‘Britishness and Otherness: An Argument’, The Journal of British Studies, vol. 31 no. 4, (October 1992), pp. 309–329. 1 empire”.7 Keith Robbins argues that the historical roots of Britishness are to be understood in relation to a ‘blending’ based on: the continued existence of historically established local and ethnic identities; the development of overarching political institutions;
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Role and Importance of the Welsh Language in Wales's Cultural Independence Within the United Kingdom
    The role and importance of the Welsh language in Wales’s cultural independence within the United Kingdom Sylvain Scaglia To cite this version: Sylvain Scaglia. The role and importance of the Welsh language in Wales’s cultural independence within the United Kingdom. Linguistics. 2012. dumas-00719099 HAL Id: dumas-00719099 https://dumas.ccsd.cnrs.fr/dumas-00719099 Submitted on 19 Jul 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. UNIVERSITE DU SUD TOULON-VAR FACULTE DES LETTRES ET SCIENCES HUMAINES MASTER RECHERCHE : CIVILISATIONS CONTEMPORAINES ET COMPAREES ANNÉE 2011-2012, 1ère SESSION The role and importance of the Welsh language in Wales’s cultural independence within the United Kingdom Sylvain SCAGLIA Under the direction of Professor Gilles Leydier Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................. 1 WALES: NOT AN INDEPENDENT STATE, BUT AN INDEPENDENT NATION ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Brexit and Jersey
    BREXIT AND JERSEY Mark Boleat April 2016 Executive summary On June 23rd voters in the United Kingdom will decide whether the UK should remain a member of the European Union. The decision will be of massive importance to the UK, a “leave” vote being followed by years of uncertainty as Britain seeks to establish a new economic relationship not just with the European Union but also with the rest of the world. By extension, the vote will also be of crucial importance to Jersey, given that Jersey’s economy is closely tied to that of the UK and Jersey’s prosperity depends on it being semi- detached to the UK. When Britain decided to seek to join the then EEC in 1971 this was seen as potentially very damaging to Jersey, at the least resulting in increased competition for agricultural products, and at worst threatening the tourism and finance industries if Jersey were to be subject to the full rules of the EEC. In the event Jersey got the best possible deal - inside the common external tariff but outside the EEC generally. These arrangements were set out in Protocol 3 to the 1972 Accession Treaty. In practice, Jersey became loosely attached to the EEC as well as semi-detached to the UK. This was achieved through low- key way, but with good preparation in both Jersey and the UK. The Brexit debate in the UK is as much emotional as rational. Business is strongly in favour of Britain remaining in the EU but finds it difficult to engage in such a debate.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Case Studies in Self-Determination: the Rock and the Bailiwick
    Two Case Studies in Self-Determination: The Rock and the Bailiwick INGE V. PORTER* TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 340 II. SELF-DETERMINATION ....................................................................................... 342 A. History...................................................................................................... 342 B. General Scope and Content...................................................................... 345 1. Decolonization................................................................................... 345 2. Post-Decolonization.......................................................................... 349 3. Historic Title ...................................................................................... 350 4. Limits to the Principleof Self-Determination.................................... 354 C. M icrostates ............................................................................................... 356 D. Future Trends ........................................................................................... 357 1. The Demise of the Principle of Self-Determination?......................... 357 2. Self-Determination as Customary Law .............................................. 358 3. Self-Determination as a Right to a Democratic Form of Government ......................................................................... 360 III. THE CASE OF GIBRALTAR ................................
    [Show full text]
  • Empire and English Nationalismn
    Nations and Nationalism 12 (1), 2006, 1–13. r ASEN 2006 Empire and English nationalismn KRISHAN KUMAR Department of Sociology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA Empire and nation: foes or friends? It is more than pious tribute to the great scholar whom we commemorate today that makes me begin with Ernest Gellner. For Gellner’s influential thinking on nationalism, and specifically of its modernity, is central to the question I wish to consider, the relation between nation and empire, and between imperial and national identity. For Gellner, as for many other commentators, nation and empire were and are antithetical. The great empires of the past belonged to the species of the ‘agro-literate’ society, whose central fact is that ‘almost everything in it militates against the definition of political units in terms of cultural bound- aries’ (Gellner 1983: 11; see also Gellner 1998: 14–24). Power and culture go their separate ways. The political form of empire encloses a vastly differ- entiated and internally hierarchical society in which the cosmopolitan culture of the rulers differs sharply from the myriad local cultures of the subordinate strata. Modern empires, such as the Soviet empire, continue this pattern of disjuncture between the dominant culture of the elites and the national or ethnic cultures of the constituent parts. Nationalism, argues Gellner, closes the gap. It insists that the only legitimate political unit is one in which rulers and ruled share the same culture. Its ideal is one state, one culture. Or, to put it another way, its ideal is the national or the ‘nation-state’, since it conceives of the nation essentially in terms of a shared culture linking all members.
    [Show full text]
  • Emigration from Great Britain
    This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: International Migrations, Volume II: Interpretations Volume Author/Editor: Walter F. Willcox, editor Volume Publisher: NBER Volume ISBN: 0-87014-017-5 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/will31-1 Publication Date: 1931 Chapter Title: Emigration from Great Britain Chapter Author: C. E. Snow Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c5111 Chapter pages in book: (p. 237 - 260) PART III STUDIES OF NATIONALEMIGRATION CURRENTS CHAPTER IX EMIGRATION FROM GREAT BRITAIN.' By DR. C. E. SNOW. General Concerning emigration from Great Britain prior to 1815, only fragmentary statistics are available, for before that date no regular attempt was made to measure the outflow of population.For some years before the treaty of peace with France, under which Canada in 1763 became a colony of the United Kingdom, a certain number of emigrants from Great Britain to the British North Amer- ican colonies were reported, but no reliable figures are available. During the five years 1769—1774 there was an emigration, probably approaching 10,000 persons per annum,2 from Scotland to North America, and substantial numbers also left England for the same destination.It has been estimated by Johnson3 that during the first decade of the nineteenth century the annual emigration from the whole of the United Kingdom to the American Continent ex- ceeded 20,000 persons, the majority going from the Highlands of Scotland and from Ireland. Emigration can be considered from two distinct aspects: (a) from the point of view of the force attracting people to other countries; (b) from the point of view of the force expelling people from their own country.
    [Show full text]
  • H 955 Great Britain
    Great Britain H 955 BACKGROUND: The heading Great Britain is used in both descriptive and subject cataloging as the conventional form for the United Kingdom, which comprises England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales. This instruction sheet describes the usage of Great Britain, in contrast to England, as a subject heading. It also describes the usage of Great Britain, England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales as geographic subdivisions. 1. Great Britain vs. England as a subject heading. In general assign the subject heading Great Britain, with topical and/or form subdivisions, as appropriate, to works about the United Kingdom as a whole. Assign England, with appropriate subdivision(s), to works limited to that country. Exception: Do not use the subdivisions BHistory or BPolitics and government under England. For a work on the history, politics, or government of England, assign the heading Great Britain, subdivided as required for the work. References in the subject authority file reflect this practice. Use the subdivision BForeign relations under England only in the restricted sense described in the scope note under EnglandBForeign relations in the subject authority file. 2. Geographic subdivision. a. Great Britain. Assign Great Britain directly after topics for works that discuss the topic in relation to Great Britain as a whole. Example: Title: History of the British theatre. 650 #0 $a Theater $z Great Britain $x History. b. England, Scotland, Northern Ireland, and Wales. Assign England, Scotland, Northern Ireland, or Wales directly after topics for works that limit their discussion to the topic in relation to one of the four constituent countries of Great Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglo-Saxon and Scots Invaders
    Anglo-Saxon and Scots Invaders By around 410AD, the last of the Romans had left Britain to go back to Rome and England was left to look after itself for the first time in about 400 years. Emperor Honorius told the people to fight the Picts, Scots and Saxons who were attacking them, but the Brits were not good fighters. The Scots, who came from Ireland, invaded and took land in Scotland. The Scots split Scotland into 4 separate places that were named Dal Riata, Pictland, Strathclyde and Bernicia. The Picts (the people already living in Scotland) and the Scots were always trying to get into England. It was hard for the people in England to fight them off without help from the Romans. The Picts and Scots are said to have jumped over Hadrian’s Wall, killing everyone in their way. The British king found it hard to get his men to stop the Picts and Scots. He was worried they would take over in England because they were excellent fighters. Then he had an idea how he could keep the Picts and Scots out. He asked two brothers called Hengest and Horsa from Jutland to come and fight for him and keep England safe from the Picts and Scots. Hengest and Horsa did help to keep the Picts and Scots out, but they liked England and they wanted to stay. They knew that the people in England were not strong fighters so they would be easy to beat. Hengest and Horsa brought more men to fight for England and over time they won.
    [Show full text]
  • LANGUAGE VARIETY in ENGLAND 1 ♦ Language Variety in England
    LANGUAGE VARIETY IN ENGLAND 1 ♦ Language Variety in England One thing that is important to very many English people is where they are from. For many of us, whatever happens to us in later life, and however much we move house or travel, the place where we grew up and spent our childhood and adolescence retains a special significance. Of course, this is not true of all of us. More often than in previous generations, families may move around the country, and there are increasing numbers of people who have had a nomadic childhood and are not really ‘from’ anywhere. But for a majority of English people, pride and interest in the area where they grew up is still a reality. The country is full of football supporters whose main concern is for the club of their childhood, even though they may now live hundreds of miles away. Local newspapers criss-cross the country in their thousands on their way to ‘exiles’ who have left their local areas. And at Christmas time the roads and railways are full of people returning to their native heath for the holiday period. Where we are from is thus an important part of our personal identity, and for many of us an important component of this local identity is the way we speak – our accent and dialect. Nearly all of us have regional features in the way we speak English, and are happy that this should be so, although of course there are upper-class people who have regionless accents, as well as people who for some reason wish to conceal their regional origins.
    [Show full text]
  • Andy Higgins, BA
    Andy Higgins, B.A. (Hons), M.A. (Hons) Music, Politics and Liquid Modernity How Rock-Stars became politicians and why Politicians became Rock-Stars Thesis submitted for the degree of Ph.D. in Politics and International Relations The Department of Politics, Philosophy and Religion University of Lancaster September 2010 Declaration I certify that this thesis is my own work and has not been submitted in substantially the same form for the award of a higher degree elsewhere 1 ProQuest Number: 11003507 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 11003507 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 Abstract As popular music eclipsed Hollywood as the most powerful mode of seduction of Western youth, rock-stars erupted through the counter-culture as potent political figures. Following its sensational arrival, the politics of popular musical culture has however moved from the shared experience of protest movements and picket lines and to an individualised and celebrified consumerist experience. As a consequence what emerged, as a controversial and subversive phenomenon, has been de-fanged and transformed into a mechanism of establishment support.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of New Jersey
    THE STORY OF NEW JERSEY HAGAMAN THE UNIVERSITY PUBLISHING COMPANY Examination Copy THE STORY OF NEW JERSEY (1948) A NEW HISTORY OF THE MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES THE STORY OF NEW JERSEY is for use in the intermediate grades. A thorough story of the Middle Atlantic States is presented; the context is enriohed with illustrations and maps. THE STORY OF NEW JERSEY begins with early Indian Life and continues to present day with glimpses of future growth. Every aspect from mineral resources to vac-| tioning areas are discussed. 160 pages. Vooabulary for 4-5 Grades. List priceJ $1.28 Net price* $ .96 (Single Copy) (5 or more, f.o.b. i ^y., point of shipment) i^c' *"*. ' THE UNIVERSITY PUBLISHING COMPANY Linooln, Nebraska ..T" 3 6047 09044948 8 lererse The Story of New Jersey BY ADALINE P. HAGAMAN Illustrated by MARY ROYT and GEORGE BUCTEL The University Publishing Company LINCOLN NEW YORK DALLAS KANSAS CITY RINGWOOD PUBLIC LIBRARY 145 Skylands Road Ringwood, New Jersey 07456 TABLE OF CONTENTS NEW.JERSEY IN THE EARLY DAYS Before White Men Came ... 5 Indian Furniture and Utensils 19 Indian Tribes in New Jersey 7 Indian Food 20 What the Indians Looked Like 11 Indian Money 24 Indian Clothing 13 What an Indian Boy Did... 26 Indian Homes 16 What Indian Girls Could Do 32 THE WHITE MAN COMES TO NEW JERSEY The Voyage of Henry Hudson 35 The English Take New Dutch Trading Posts 37 Amsterdam 44 The Colony of New The English Settle in New Amsterdam 39 Jersey 47 The Swedes Come to New New Jersey Has New Jersey 42 Owners 50 PIONEER DAYS IN NEW JERSEY Making a New Home 52 Clothing of the Pioneers ..
    [Show full text]
  • Background, Brexit, and Relations with the United States
    The United Kingdom: Background, Brexit, and Relations with the United States Updated April 16, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL33105 SUMMARY RL33105 The United Kingdom: Background, Brexit, and April 16, 2021 Relations with the United States Derek E. Mix Many U.S. officials and Members of Congress view the United Kingdom (UK) as the United Specialist in European States’ closest and most reliable ally. This perception stems from a combination of factors, Affairs including a sense of shared history, values, and culture; a large and mutually beneficial economic relationship; and extensive cooperation on foreign policy and security issues. The UK’s January 2020 withdrawal from the European Union (EU), often referred to as Brexit, is likely to change its international role and outlook in ways that affect U.S.-UK relations. Conservative Party Leads UK Government The government of the UK is led by Prime Minister Boris Johnson of the Conservative Party. Brexit has dominated UK domestic politics since the 2016 referendum on whether to leave the EU. In an early election held in December 2019—called in order to break a political deadlock over how and when the UK would exit the EU—the Conservative Party secured a sizeable parliamentary majority, winning 365 seats in the 650-seat House of Commons. The election results paved the way for Parliament’s approval of a withdrawal agreement negotiated between Johnson’s government and the EU. UK Is Out of the EU, Concludes Trade and Cooperation Agreement On January 31, 2020, the UK’s 47-year EU membership came to an end.
    [Show full text]
  • Losing an Empire, Losing a Role?: the Commonwealth Vision, British Identity, and African Decolonization, 1959-1963
    LOSING AN EMPIRE, LOSING A ROLE?: THE COMMONWEALTH VISION, BRITISH IDENTITY, AND AFRICAN DECOLONIZATION, 1959-1963 By Emily Lowrance-Floyd Submitted to the graduate degree program in History and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Chairperson Dr. Victor Bailey . Dr. Katherine Clark . Dr. Dorice Williams Elliott . Dr. Elizabeth MacGonagle . Dr. Leslie Tuttle Date Defended: April 6, 2012 ii The Dissertation Committee for Emily Lowrance-Floyd certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: LOSING AN EMPIRE, LOSING A ROLE?: THE COMMONWEALTH VISION, BRITISH IDENTITY, AND AFRICAN DECOLONIZATION, 1959-1963 . Chairperson Dr. Victor Bailey Date approved: April 6, 2012 iii ABSTRACT Many observers of British national identity assume that decolonization presaged a crisis in the meaning of Britishness. The rise of the new imperial history, which contends Empire was central to Britishness, has only strengthened faith in this assumption, yet few historians have explored the actual connections between end of empire and British national identity. This project examines just this assumption by studying the final moments of decolonization in Africa between 1959 and 1963. Debates in the popular political culture and media demonstrate the extent to which British identity and meanings of Britishness on the world stage intertwined with the process of decolonization. A discursive tradition characterized as the “Whiggish vision,” in the words of historian Wm. Roger Louis, emerged most pronounced in this era. This vision, developed over the centuries of Britain imagining its Empire, posited that the British Empire was a benign, liberalizing force in the world and forecasted a teleology in which Empire would peacefully transform into a free, associative Commonwealth of Nations.
    [Show full text]