DOCSLIB.ORG

Britishness: Towards a Progressive Citizenship

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Britishness: Towards a Progressive Citizenship Britishness_Text.qxd 13/3/07 15:21 Page 1 THE SMITH INSTITUTE Britishness: towards a progressive citizenship Edited by Nick Johnson Published by the Smith Institute ISBN 1 905370 18 0 This report, like all Smith Institute monographs, represents the views of the authors and not those of the Smith Institute. © The Smith Institute 2007 Britishness_Text.qxd 13/3/07 15:21 Page 2 THE SMITH INSTITUTE Contents Preface By Wilf Stevenson, Director, Smith Institute 3 Introduction Nick Johnson, Director of Policy and Public Sector at the Commission 4 for Racial Equality Chapter 1: The progressive value of civic patriotism 14 Professor Todd Gitlin, Sociologist and Author Chapter 2: Is Britishness relevant? 22 Sadiq Khan, Labour MP for Tooting Chapter 3: Immigration and national identity 30 Robert Winder, Author Chapter 4: Britishness and integration 38 Trevor Phillips, Chair of the Commission for Equality & Human Rights and formerly Chair of the Commission for Racial Equality Chapter 5: Not less immigration, but more integration 48 Nick Pearce, Director of the Institute for Public Policy Research Chapter 6: Belonging – local and national 60 Geoff Mulgan, Director of the Young Foundation, and Rushanara Ali, Associate Director of the Young Foundation Chapter 7: Devolution – the layers of identity 68 Catherine Stihler, Labour MEP for Scotland Chapter 8: Citizenship education and identity formation 76 Tony Breslin, Chief Executive of the Citizenship Foundation Chapter 9: Faith and nation 84 Madeleine Bunting, Journalist and Author Endnote: Towards a progressive British citizenship? 94 Nick Johnson 2 Britishness_Text.qxd 13/3/07 15:21 Page 3 THE SMITH INSTITUTE Preface Wilf Stevenson, Director, Smith Institute The Smith Institute is an independent think tank which has been set up to undertake research and education in issues that flow from the changing relationship between social values and economic imperatives. In recent years the institute has centred its work on the policy implications arising from the interactions of equality, enterprise and equity. The aim of this pamphlet is to look at the ways in which issues of diversity and equality interact with the notion of a positively stated and recognisable understanding of “Britishness”. Many contemporary political speeches across the political spectrum deal with Britishness. For example, the Chancellor of the Exchequer has sought to argue for a common ground of progressive policy that reflects a range of “enduring British values”. However, there are clearly potential tensions between the desire to celebrate common values, and the notion of Britain as a nation that is welcoming and accommodating of a wide range of cultures and belief systems. The essays in this collection offer stimulating and thought-provoking accounts of what a progressive national feeling might encompass, and how it might be encouraged and shaped in the coming years. Over the course of their contributions, the authors address a wide range of questions germane to this debate: Is it possible to develop a statement of Britishness that transcends the wide range of beliefs and values that exist within the population? Can public institutions really claim to be difference-blind, or is it a matter of supporting and bolstering the public validity of group identities? How can the internally fluid and contested nature of “group identity” be recognised and taken into account when developing policies and shaping the requirements of British citizenship? What are the best ways to understand and respond progressively to the patterns of mass migration and the appearance of new cultures and communities within the British population? Can “Britishness” be understood in terms of the way we approach issues of difference within our borders? The Smith Institute thanks Nick Johnson for editing this collection and gratefully acknowledges the support of the Commission for Racial Equality towards this publication. 3 Britishness_Text.qxd 13/3/07 15:21 Page 4 THE SMITH INSTITUTE Introduction Nick Johnson, Director of Policy and Public Sector at the Commission for Racial Equality If you spill a stranger’s drink by accident, it is good manners (and prudent) to offer to buy another. Britain is famous for being a nation of animal lovers, and many people in Britain keep pets. Taken from Life in the United Kingdom, A Journey to Citizenship 1 It is the sense, and often the fact, of community, of human dialogue, the thousand invisible strands of common experience and purpose, affection and respect, which tie men to their fellows. It is expressed in such words as community, neighbourhood, civic pride, friendship. It provides the life-sustaining force of human warmth, of security amongst others, and a sense of one’s own human significance in the accepted associations and companionship of others. Robert F Kennedy, in his last book, To Seek a Newer World 2 What is Britishness? Too often when Britishness is discussed, we concentrate on the details, the slightly ironic notions of the small things that, taken together, make up what we can call a national identity. Rarely do we talk of Britishness as a sense of belonging, of common bonds – of the higher national purpose that Robert Kennedy outlines. Given this, it can be no wonder that the recent British social attitudes survey showed that the proportion of people who consider themselves British has fallen from 52% in 1997 to 44% in 2007. The problem here may not be that people are rejecting Britishness per se, but rather that there is uncertainty as to what being British might involve. Many accounts of what binds citizens in Britain together are expressed in terms of what being British cannot include. Icons of Britishness are seemingly set in stone and always under threat – from outsiders, government and the modern world. Britishness can often be seen as anachronistic and exclusive. Yet for others, it is meaningless – too abstract and inclusive to be anything distinctive. British values are almost always universal values, British behaviour quaint but hardly generating a shared sense of identity. 1 Life in the United Kingdom, A Journey to Citizenship (Home Office, 2004) 2 Kennedy, Robert To Seek a Newer World (Doubleday, 1967) 4 Britishness_Text.qxd 13/3/07 15:21 Page 5 THE SMITH INSTITUTE For progressives – with their commitment to internationalism, diversity, and equal opportunities and responsibilities for all citizens regardless of ethnicity, gender, age or faith – an exclusive or backward-looking account of what it is to be a citizen of Britain cannot be satisfactory. The lack of a positive account of what it means to be British could underpin what the Chancellor of the Exchequer has referred to as a “yearning for community” among the British public. In an age of global travel and communication, in which patterns of migration are bringing ever more diversity and richness to the texture of British society, the need for an account of what it might mean to be a part of British society in all its diversity is greater than ever. This collection of essays aims to show why Britishness matters even more in this world of hyper-diversity and movement: how it can be drawn inclusively and aspirationally and how, through developing a more concrete sense of shared identity, we can piece together the “thousand invisible strands of common experience and purpose”. … something to be proud of? American writer and sociologist Professor Todd Gitlin makes a passionate case that not only do progressives need to embrace patriotism, but patriotism itself requires a progressive application if it is not to wither. He places the debate over Britishness among competing visions for the future – one anachronistic, rooted in the past, and the other forward-looking and embracing change. For too long, he argues, politicians of the left have been too fearful of talking about Britishness, instead leaving it to the right to promote a narrow and exclusive view of national identity. He proclaims that “the nation must be saved from the nationalists” and places the onus on defining a view of national identity that is integrationist, not assimilationist. In an argument reflected in the contributions of both Trevor Phillips and Robert Winder, Gitlin shows how we can develop a concept of Britishness that recognises the diversity that has been an essential part of our history and is vital to our future. However, he also contends that we should not fudge real differences and that national identity can be an answer to some of the present debates over diversity and multi- culturalism. Just as he rejects the right’s attempts to proclaim a cultural homogeneity to Britishness that does not exist, Gitlin also criticises laissez-faire multiculturalism for seeking to ignore the need for common allegiance. Britishness, he argues, can be the bridge between recognising cultural difference and multiple identities, while retaining some cohesion to the shared space we inhabit. 5 Britishness_Text.qxd 13/3/07 15:21 Page 6 THE SMITH INSTITUTE To realise this vision, we need to concentrate on the role Britishness can play in our notions of citizenship and social solidarity, rather than seeing it as an ethnicity. Gitlin argues for seeing Britishness as a form of social contract that ties people together in an ever more fluid world. … a symbol of solidarity and citizenship? Labour MP Sadiq Khan makes a conceptual case for why Britishness matters and also gives an account of what that might mean for policy makers. Like other contributors, he sees no contradiction between a strong sense of British identity and other identities to which people may have loyalty. Indeed, he sees a renewed debate and focus on Britishness as a way of resolving some of our present debates over integration and cohesion. For Khan, a strong notion of Britishness as a civic contract offers an important way of thinking about how different identities can coexist with a mutual sense of belonging as a British citizen.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bangla Stories 1 2 3 6 10 13 16 20 23 27
    TEACHING RESOURCES FOR KEY STAGE 3 Acknowledgements Lesson plans devised by Anusree Biswas. All photographs are © LSE/Runnymede except the photograph of Rushanara Ali which is taken from Wikimedia Commons which states that the photo is in the public domain, and is reproduced here with thanks. Introduction: Using the Lesson Plans .............................................................................. 2 Theme 1: Identity/Self-identification .......................................................................... 3 Theme 2: Exploring Identity ........................................................................................ 6 Theme 3: Home .......................................................................................................... 10 Theme 4: Family History ............................................................................................ 13 Theme 5: Migration .................................................................................................... 16 Theme 6: Generation ................................................................................................. 20 Theme 7: Prejudice .................................................................................................... 23 Theme 8: Celebrating Bengali Culture ..................................................................... 27 ISBN: 978 1 906732 62 2 (online) EAN: 9781906732622 (online) Published by Runnymede in July 2010, this document is copyright © Runnymede. Open access. Some rights reserved. The Runnymede Trust wants
    [Show full text]
  • Brexit and Jersey
    BREXIT AND JERSEY Mark Boleat April 2016 Executive summary On June 23rd voters in the United Kingdom will decide whether the UK should remain a member of the European Union. The decision will be of massive importance to the UK, a “leave” vote being followed by years of uncertainty as Britain seeks to establish a new economic relationship not just with the European Union but also with the rest of the world. By extension, the vote will also be of crucial importance to Jersey, given that Jersey’s economy is closely tied to that of the UK and Jersey’s prosperity depends on it being semi- detached to the UK. When Britain decided to seek to join the then EEC in 1971 this was seen as potentially very damaging to Jersey, at the least resulting in increased competition for agricultural products, and at worst threatening the tourism and finance industries if Jersey were to be subject to the full rules of the EEC. In the event Jersey got the best possible deal - inside the common external tariff but outside the EEC generally. These arrangements were set out in Protocol 3 to the 1972 Accession Treaty. In practice, Jersey became loosely attached to the EEC as well as semi-detached to the UK. This was achieved through low- key way, but with good preparation in both Jersey and the UK. The Brexit debate in the UK is as much emotional as rational. Business is strongly in favour of Britain remaining in the EU but finds it difficult to engage in such a debate.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglo-Saxon and Scots Invaders
    Anglo-Saxon and Scots Invaders By around 410AD, the last of the Romans had left Britain to go back to Rome and England was left to look after itself for the first time in about 400 years. Emperor Honorius told the people to fight the Picts, Scots and Saxons who were attacking them, but the Brits were not good fighters. The Scots, who came from Ireland, invaded and took land in Scotland. The Scots split Scotland into 4 separate places that were named Dal Riata, Pictland, Strathclyde and Bernicia. The Picts (the people already living in Scotland) and the Scots were always trying to get into England. It was hard for the people in England to fight them off without help from the Romans. The Picts and Scots are said to have jumped over Hadrian’s Wall, killing everyone in their way. The British king found it hard to get his men to stop the Picts and Scots. He was worried they would take over in England because they were excellent fighters. Then he had an idea how he could keep the Picts and Scots out. He asked two brothers called Hengest and Horsa from Jutland to come and fight for him and keep England safe from the Picts and Scots. Hengest and Horsa did help to keep the Picts and Scots out, but they liked England and they wanted to stay. They knew that the people in England were not strong fighters so they would be easy to beat. Hengest and Horsa brought more men to fight for England and over time they won.
    [Show full text]
  • One Nation: Power, Hope, Community
    one nation power hope community power hope community Ed Miliband has set out his vision of One Nation: a country where everyone has a stake, prosperity is fairly shared, and we make a common life together. A group of Labour MPs, elected in 2010 and after, describe what this politics of national renewal means to them. It begins in the everyday life of work, family and local place. It is about the importance of having a sense of belonging and community, and sharing power and responsibility with people. It means reforming the state and the market in order to rebuild the economy, share power hope community prosperity, and end the living standards crisis. And it means doing politics in a different way: bottom up not top down, organising not managing. A new generation is changing Labour to change the country. Edited by Owen Smith and Rachael Reeves Contributors: Shabana Mahmood Rushanara Ali Catherine McKinnell Kate Green Gloria De Piero Lilian Greenwood Steve Reed Tristram Hunt Rachel Reeves Dan Jarvis Owen Smith Edited by Owen Smith and Rachel Reeves 9 781909 831001 1 ONE NATION power hope community Edited by Owen Smith & Rachel Reeves London 2013 3 First published 2013 Collection © the editors 2013 Individual articles © the author The authors have asserted their rights under the Copyright, Design and Patents Act, 1998 to be identified as authors of this work. All rights reserved. Apart from fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, electrical, chemical, mechanical, optical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of British and American Cultural Differences on English and American Literature Review Jiao
    2016 4th International Conference on Advances in Social Science, Humanities, and Management (ASSHM 2016) ISBN: 978-1-60595-412-7 The Influence of British and American Cultural Differences on English and American Literature Review Jiao Lei1 Abstract In an era of globalization, cross-cultural communication is not strange to us with studying and travelling abroad, and even immigration becoming a part of our lives. In such an era of international communication being increasingly frequent, learning the culture of other countries will help us to do well in international communication. The paper is going to study, from the British and American history and culture, the differences of all kinds of their present acts in the world and impacts of the historical reasons on their own citizens, to not only let the reader understand the cultural differences between these two countries, but also to get the cause of the difference to better understand their cultures. Key words: British and American Culture; Religion; Literature Review 1 INTRODUCTION First of all, we are going to talk about the homology of British and American culture which is undeniable. British culture is the root and source of American culture with the United Kingdom people accounting for a very large proportion of the early settlers of the United States. Let nature take its course, they brought their culture, their personalities, ways of thinking to this new continent. Moreover, in the major historical events of modern times, many cooperation has occurred in these two countries which brought many common points in their cultural exchanges. However, there is a large difference between these two countries regarding to their own history: the history of Britain is longer than the United States’, because before the industrial revolution, Britain has a long period of agriculture civilization, and much British people's cultural life has been influenced by the upper class of French due to the French occupation.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Letter to the Pm to Be Signed by Mps and Peers
    OPEN LETTER TO THE PM TO BE SIGNED BY MPS AND PEERS The Rt Hon Boris Johnson MP Prime Minister Office of the Prime Minister 10 Downing Street London, SW1A 2AA May 2020 Dear Prime Minister Subject: OPEN LETTER FROM MPS & PEERS: COVID-19: THEATRE & THE PERFORMING ARTS SECTOR, WHAT’S NEEDED FOR SURVIVAL & RECOVERY Whilst we know you are considering how best to protect and support many areas of the economy, this letter summarises the current and future impact of COVID-19 on performing arts businesses around the UK and calls on you and your teams in DCMS, Treasury and BEIS to take action on what is needed immediately; and over the coming months to rescue the sector and allow theatre to contribute to the future success of the UK. The performing arts’ contribution to the UK: economic & social British theatre (from drama to musical theatre to opera to dance) is a world-class cultural and economic force with British theatrical productions filling cultural venues and theatres from Broadway to Beijing. From small studios to big-budget stages, theatre and the performing arts are part of the fabric of British life. Towns, villages and cities the breadth of the UK have and use theatres for more than seeing a show – they are spaces for many different groups in community to come together to learn, socialise and create. As you know, the creative industries are a motor of growth in local economies from the South East to the North West, from Yorkshire and the Humber to the West Midlands. Theatre’s workforce of 290,000 people includes 70% who are self-employed and move freely between scales and sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • MEND Briefing Paper – Islamophobia
    Defining Islamophobia Briefing Paper from Muslim Engagement and Development April 2019 As the world recovers from the recent deaths of fifty people in devastating far-right terror attacks on two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand, there are few reminders of the danger of Islamophobia that are more poignant. This problem is not new to the UK and its persistent presence in the daily lives of our Muslim communities is a stark reminder that action is needed to combat all forms of hatred which leave innocent individuals vulnerable to marginalisation, discrimination, and even violence. Politicians such as Baroness Sayeeda Warsi have remarked on how Islamophobia “has passed the dinner table test” in the UK. Indeed, looking at patterns of Islamophobic comments amongst prominent members of political parties, it seems Islamophobic beliefs have been afforded an air of legitimacy even amongst our political representatives. To protect our Muslim communities and meaningfully combat Islamophobia, it is essential that policymakers are firstly equipped with a definition with which to identify it. MEND, therefore, urges the UK Government to: 1. Adopt the definition of Islamophobia produced by the APPG (All-Party Parliamentary Group) on British Muslims: “Islamophobia is rooted in racism and is a type of racism that targets expressions of Muslimness or perceived Muslimness.” 2. Apply the above definition in conjunction with the following guidelines: Islamophobia is demonstrated in, and articulated through, speech, writing, behaviours, structures, policies, legislation or activities that work to control, regulate or exclude Muslim participation within social, civic, economic and political life, or which embody hatred, vilification, stereotyping, abuse, or violence directed at Muslims.
    [Show full text]
  • General Election 2015 Report to National Executive Committee 24Th March 2015 Harriet Harman QC MP
    Woman to Woman Campaign Tour - General Election 2015 Report to National Executive Committee 24th March 2015 Harriet Harman QC MP @HarrietHarman | #pinkbus1 | #Labour4women Table of Contents Labour’s Woman to Woman Campaign….…….……..…3 65 Constituencies Visited to Date……………………….….5 Meeting Women in Many Different Settings…….….…7 Woman to Woman Campaign Literature…….………….8 Woman to Woman Digital Campaign……………..……..10 Saturation National and Local Media Coverage……..13 Key Campaigners……………………………………………….....14 Women Trade Unionists…………..……………………….....16 The #Pinkbus tour has been made possible by enormous support from the Party and I would like to thank Iain McNicol and his team particularly Emilie Oldknow, Emma Meehan and her team, the Regional offices, the local and national Press teams, Kat Segal and the digital team, Caroline Adams, Anouska Gregorek, Beth Gardiner-Smith and my own team particularly Ayesha Hazarika, Sophie Wingfield, Clare Gosbee, Hannah Lazell and Matt Price. 2 Labour’s Woman to Woman Campaign Labour's Woman to Woman campaign is the biggest ever women's campaign to reach out to women across the country ahead of May's General Election - particularly the 9 million women who did not vote in 2010. With the famous Pink Bus, the Woman to Woman campaign has visited 65 constituencies and will be campaigning up to Election Day in every English Region, in Wales and Scotland. Women from across Labour's team - including Shadow Cabinet members, MPs, councillors, MEPs, peers, AMs, MSPs and members of the GLA as well as from our affiliated trade unions - have joined the Woman to Woman tour. We have been highlighting all of Labour's key policies on the NHS, on the economy, on housing, education and immigration - but also issues of childcare, equal pay, tackling domestic violence, older women and women's representation.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Democracy: Race and the 2015 General Election
    June 2015 Intelligence for a multi-ethnic Britain Diversity and Democracy: Race and the 2015 General Election Summary Table 1. Top 15 Labour vote share increases in diverse seats, 2015 • In 2015, Labour remained the first preference for most Labour Minority Black and minority ethnic voters, with around 60% choosing Constituency increase population Labour. The Conservatives have increased their vote share Birmingham, Hall Green 26.9% 64% significantly, from around 16% in 2010 to over 25% in 2015 Brent Central* 20.9% 61% • The Liberal Democrats got around 5% of the BME vote, and Poplar and Limehouse 18.6% 57% the Greens less. Only 2% of BME voters chose UKIP Bethnal Green and Bow 18.3% 53% • There is increasing variation in how different ethnic minority Birmingham, Ladywood 18.0% 73% groups vote, as well as regional differences Walthamstow 17.0% 53% • There are now 41 BME MPs, a significant rise, suggesting a Manchester, Gorton 17.0% 48% future BME Prime Minister could now be sitting in Parliament Birmingham, Hodge Hill 16.4% 64% • The success of Britain’s democracy depends not only on BME Leyton and Wanstead 15.0% 51% voter participation and representation, but on policymakers Ilford South 14.6% 76% responding to ethnic inequalities Leicester South 14.2% 51% Bradford East 13.8% 47% Introduction Bermondsey and Old Southwark* 13.8% 42% The 2015 General Election saw the Conservative Prime Ealing Southall 13.5% 70% Minister David Cameron returned with his party’s first overall Ealing Central and Acton* 13.1% 37% majority since John Major’s win in 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Attitudes of British People
    Attitudes of British People Conservatism • In general, the British value continuity over modernity for its own sake. • There is prestige in living in an obviously old one. • They have a general sentimental attachment to older, supposedly safer, times. • Their Christmas cards usually depict scenes from past centuries; • they like their pubs to look old; • they were reluctant to change their system of currency. Being different • They are rather proud of being different. • driving on the left-hand side of the road • The double-decker bus • Systems of measurement • everybody in Britain still shops in pounds and ounces. • Nearly everybody still thinks in Fahrenheit when talking about temperature. • Their financial year is at the beginning of April. The love of nature • Love of the countryside is another aspect of British conservatism. • an active interest in country matters • gardening The love of animals • Rossendale Pet Cemetery in Lancashire is just one example of an animal graveyard in Britain. • the status of pets is taken seriously. • Wildlife programmes are by far the most popular kind of television documentary. • Millions of families have 'bird-tables' in their gardens. • There is even a special hospital (St Tiggywinkles) which treats injured wild animals. Formality and informality • It all depends on whether a person is playing a public role or a private role. • Clothes - 'on duty' – formal • Clothes - not playing a public role – informal • Being friendly in Britain disregards formalities. • not addressing someone by his or her title (Mr, Mrs, Professor etc), • not dressing smartly when entertaining guests, • not shaking hands when meeting and • not saying 'please' when making a request.
    [Show full text]
  • What Next for Labour?
    What next cover 6/9/09 9:48 PM Page 1 what next for Labour? what next Demos is grateful to all the contributors to this volume: Rushanara Ali what next for Associate Director at the Young Foundation Jessica Asato Acting Director of Progress Phillip Blond Labour? Director of the Progressive Conservatism Project at Demos Burks Peter Harrington and Beatrice Karol edited by Martin Bright Political journalist and founder of New Deal of the Mind ideas for the Philip Collins Chair of Trustees, Demos Jon Cruddas MP for Dagenham progressive left Alan Finlayson Reader in Politics and International Relations at Swansea University Maurice Glasman Director of the Faith and Citizenship Programme at London Metropolitan University A COLLECTION OF ESSAYS Lisa Harker and Carey Oppenheim Co-directors of the Institute for Public Policy Research Tristram Hunt Lecturer in History at Queen Mary, University of London Kevin Jefferys Professor of Contemporary History at Plymouth University Tessa Jowell MP for Dulwich and West Norwood. Minister for the Cabinet Office and the Olympics, and Paymaster General Sunder Katwala General Secretary of the Fabian Society Neal Lawson Chair of Compass David Marquand Chair of the Demos Advisory Council and Visiting Fellow, University of Oxford Michael Meacher Former Environment Secretary Richard Reeves Director of Demos Jenni Russell Writer, broadcaster and columnist for the Guardian Jonathan Rutherford Editor of Soundings and Professor of Cultural Studies, Middlesex University Stuart White Director of the Public Policy Unit at the University of Oxford ISBN 978-1-906693-17-6 £5 © Demos 2009 What next cover 6/9/09 9:48 PM Page 2 1 First published in 2009 © Demos.
    [Show full text]
  • [2019] CSOH 68 P680/19 OPINION of LORD DOHERTY in the Petition
    OUTER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION [2019] CSOH 68 P680/19 OPINION OF LORD DOHERTY In the petition (FIRST) JOANNA CHERRY QC MP, (SECOND) JOLYON MAUGHAM QC, (THIRD) JOANNE SWINSON MP, (FOURTH) IAN MURRAY MP, (FIFTH) GERAINT DAVIES MP, (SIXTH) HYWEL WILLIAMS MP, (SEVENTH) HEIDI ALLEN MP, (EIGHTH) ANGELA SMITH MP, (NINTH) THE RT HON PETER HAIN, THE LORD HAIN OF NEATH, (TENTH) JENNIFER JONES, THE BARONESS JONES OF MOULESCOOMB, (ELEVENTH) THE RT HON JANET ROYALL, THE BARONESS ROYALL OF BLAISDON, (TWELFTH) ROBERT WINSTON, THE LORD WINSTON OF HAMMERSMITH, (THIRTEENTH) STEWART WOOD, THE LORD WOOD OF ANFIELD, (FOURTEENTH) DEBBIE ABRAHAMS MP, (FIFTEENTH) RUSHANARA ALI MP, (SIXTEENTH) TONIA ANTONIAZZI MP, (SEVENTEENTH) HANNAH BARDELL MP, (EIGHTEENTH) DR ROBERTA BLACKMAN-WOODS MP, (NINETEENTH) BEN BRADSHAW MP, (TWENTIETH) THE RT HON TOM BRAKE MP, (TWENTY-FIRST) KAREN BUCK MP, (TWENTY-SECOND) RUTH CADBURY MP,(TWENTY-THIRD) MARSHA DE CORDOVA MP, (TWENTY-FOURTH) RONNIE COWAN MP, (TWENTY-FIFTH) NEIL COYLE MP, (TWENTY-SIXTH) STELLA CREASY MP, (TWENTY-SEVENTH) WAYNE DAVID MP, (TWENTY-EIGHTH) EMMA DENT COAD MP, (TWENTY-NINTH) STEPHEN DOUGHTY MP, (THIRTIETH) ROSIE DUFFIELD MP, (THIRTY-FIRST) JONATHAN EDWARDS MP, (THIRTY-SECOND) PAUL FARRELLY MP, (THIRTY-THIRD) JAMES FRITH MP, (THIRTY-FOURTH) RUTH GEORGE MP, (THIRTY-FIFTH) STEPHEN GETHINS MP, (THIRTY-SIXTH) PREET KAUR GILL MP, (THIRTY-SEVENTH) PATRICK GRADY MP, (THIRTY-EIGHTH) KATE GREEN MP, (THIRTY-NINTH) LILIAN GREENWOOD MP, (FORTIETH) JOHN GROGAN MP, (FORTY-FIRST) HELEN HAYES MP, (FORTY- SECOND) WERA HOBHOUSE MP, (FORTY-THIRD) THE RT HON DAME MARGARET HODGE MP, (FORTY-FOURTH) DR RUPA HUQ MP, (FORTY-FIFTH) RUTH JONES MP, (FORTY-SIXTH) GED KILLEN MP, (FORTY-SEVENTH) PETER KYLE MP, (FORTY- EIGHTH) BEN LAKE MP, (FORTY-NINTH) THE RT HON DAVID LAMMY MP, (FIFTIETH) CLIVE LEWIS MP, (FIFTY-FIRST) KERRY MCCARTHY MP, (FIFTY-SECOND) 2 STUART C.
    [Show full text]