DOCSLIB.ORG

Download (PDF)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download (PDF) Supplemental Table 1A Fold change Affymetrix probe Gene title Gene symbol (log2 ratio to ID control) 1424525_at gastrin releasing peptide Grp 5.80 1427747_a_at lipocalin 2 Lcn2 5.27 1449833_at small proline‐rich protein 2F Sprr2f 5.04 1450297_at interleukin 6 Il6 5.02 1450364_a_at hepatitis A virus cellular receptor 1 Havcr1 4.42 1452098_at CTF18, chromosome transmission fidelity factor 18 homolog (S. cerevisiae) Chtf18 4.25 1419282_at chemokine (C‐C motif) ligand 12 Ccl12 4.11 serine (or cysteine) peptidase inhibitor, clade A (alpha‐1 antiproteinase, 1424758_s_at Serpina10 3.96 antitrypsin), member 10 1460227_at tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 Timp1 3.86 1419100_at serine (or cysteine) peptidase inhibitor, clade A, member 3N Serpina3n 3.59 1418626_a_at clusterin Clu 3.31 1416025_at fibrinogen, gamma polypeptide Fgg 3.25 1448756_at S100 calcium binding protein A9 (calgranulin B) S100a9 3.18 1427682_a_at early growth response 2 Egr2 3.17 1452279_at complement factor properdin Cfp 3.03 1422851_at high mobility group AT‐hook 2 Hmga2 3.01 1419579_at solute carrier family 7 (cationic amino acid transporter, y+ system), member 12 Slc7a12 2.98 1419209_at chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) ligand 1 Cxcl1 2.92 1419764_at chitinase 3‐like 3 Chi3l3 2.91 1423954_at complement component 3 C3 2.88 1424279_at fibrinogen, alpha polypeptide Fga 2.86 1424556_at pyrroline‐5‐carboxylate reductase 1 Pycr1 2.77 1418778_at coiled‐coil domain containing 109B Ccdc109b 2.76 1422864_at runt related transcription factor 1 Runx1 2.65 1433966_x_at asparagine synthetase Asns 2.64 1420991_at ankyrin repeat domain 1 (cardiac muscle) Ankrd1 2.57 1422789_at aldehyde dehydrogenase family 1, subfamily A2 Aldh1a2 2.55 1417300_at sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase, acid‐like 3B Smpdl3b 2.51 1449682_s_at tubulin, beta 2b Tubb2b 2.49 1416342_at tenascin C Tnc 2.44 1416854_at solute carrier family 34 (sodium phosphate), member 2 Slc34a2 2.42 1421375_a_at S100 calcium binding protein A6 (calcyclin) S100a6 2.38 1429294_at thyroid hormone receptor interactor 13 Trip13 2.36 1424502_at oncoprotein induced transcript 1 Oit1 2.34 1434719_at alpha‐2‐macroglobulin A2m 2.31 1417268_at CD14 antigen Cd14 2.30 1416576_at suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 Socs3 2.29 1421279_at laminin, gamma 2 Lamc2 2.27 1425451_s_at chitinase 3‐like 3 Chi3l3 2.23 1417290_at leucine‐rich alpha‐2‐glycoprotein 1 Lrg1 2.19 1416431_at tubulin, beta 6 Tubb6 2.18 1424938_at six transmembrane epithelial antigen of the prostate 1 Steap1 2.17 1418148_at abhydrolase domain containing 1 Abhd1 2.16 1418609_at interleukin 1 family, member 6 Il1f6 2.16 1419149_at serine (or cysteine) peptidase inhibitor, clade E, member 1 Serpine1 2.16 1417019_a_at cell division cycle 6 homolog (S. cerevisiae) Cdc6 2.15 1418930_at chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) ligand 10 Cxcl10 2.15 1449164_at CD68 antigen Cd68 2.13 1431226_a_at fibronectin type III domain containing 4 Fndc4 2.08 1422562_at Ras‐related associated with diabetes Rrad 2.02 1416325_at cysteine‐rich secretory protein 1 Crisp1 2.00 1422430_at fidgetin‐like 1 Fignl1 2.00 1426808_at lectin, galactose binding, soluble 3 Lgals3 1.98 1418589_a_at myeloid leukemia factor 1 Mlf1 1.96 1448169_at keratin 18 Krt18 1.95 1449764_x_at synovial sarcoma, X breakpoint 2 interacting protein Ssx2ip 1.95 1423760_at CD44 antigen Cd44 1.93 1420394_s_at glycoprotein 49 A Gp49a 1.92 1427318_s_at dysferlin /// fer‐1‐like 3, myoferlin (C. elegans) Dysf 1.92 1421936_at dual adaptor for phosphotyrosine and 3‐phosphoinositides 1 Dapp1 1.89 1417450_a_at transforming, acidic coiled‐coil containing protein 3 Tacc3 1.88 1417328_at excision repair cross‐complementing rodent repair deficiency, complementation Ercc1 1.86 1419609_at chemokine (C‐C motif) receptor 1 Ccr1 1.86 1424727_at chemokine (C‐C motif) receptor 5 Ccr5 1.86 1418133_at B‐cell leukemia/lymphoma 3 Bcl3 1.84 1418919_at shugoshin‐like 1 (S. pombe) Sgol1 1.84 1455650_at Transcribed locus ‐‐‐ 1.84 1420028_s_at minichromosome maintenance deficient 3 (S. cerevisiae) LOC100045677 1.80 1452679_at tubulin, beta 2b Tubb2b 1.80 1416382_at cathepsin C Ctsc 1.79 1448894_at aldo‐keto reductase family 1, member B8 Akr1b8 1.79 1417821_at DNA segment, Chr 17, human D6S56E 5 D17H6S56E‐5 1.78 1418674_at oncostatin M receptor Osmr 1.78 1421207_at leukemia inhibitory factor Lif 1.78 1424600_at amiloride binding protein 1 (amine oxidase, copper‐containing) Abp1 1.78 1426858_at inhibin beta‐B Inhbb 1.76 1416246_a_at coronin, actin binding protein 1A Coro1a 1.74 1418724_at complement component factor i Cfi 1.74 1424046_at budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 1 homolog (S. cerevisiae) Bub1 1.74 1449401_at complement component 1, q subcomponent, C chain C1qc 1.74 1449984_at chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) ligand 2 Cxcl2 1.74 1452459_at asp (abnormal spindle)‐like, microcephaly associated (Drosophila) Aspm 1.74 1419135_at lymphotoxin B Ltb 1.73 1416698_a_at CDC28 protein kinase 1b Cks1b 1.72 1415945_at minichromosome maintenance deficient 5, cell division cycle 46 (S. cerevisiae) Mcm5 1.71 1417541_at helicase, lymphoid specific Hells 1.71 1438009_at histone cluster 1, H2ao Hist1h2ao 1.71 1418847_at arginase type II Arg2 1.70 1418281_at RAD51 homolog (S. cerevisiae) Rad51 1.69 1427141_at RIKEN cDNA 2700099C18 gene 2700099C18Rik 1.68 1417938_at RAD51 associated protein 1 Rad51ap1 1.66 1422628_at RIKEN cDNA 4632417K18 gene 4632417K18Rik 1.66 1423774_a_at protein regulator of cytokinesis 1 Prc1 1.66 1433543_at anillin, actin binding protein (scraps homolog, Drosophila) Anln 1.66 1455990_at kinesin family member 23 Kif23 1.66 1428942_at metallothionein 2 Mt2 1.65 1450355_a_at capping protein (actin filament), gelsolin‐like Capg 1.65 1415810_at ubiquitin‐like, containing PHD and RING finger domains, 1 Uhrf1 1.64 1423100_at FBJ osteosarcoma oncogene Fos 1.64 1428988_at ATP‐binding cassette, sub‐family C (CFTR/MRP), member 3 Abcc3 1.63 1427105_at centromere protein N Cenpn 1.62 1416757_at Zwilch, kinetochore associated, homolog (Drosophila) Zwilch 1.61 1418283_at claudin 4 Cldn4 1.61 1451931_x_at histocompatibility 2, D region H2‐L 1.61 1418945_at matrix metallopeptidase 3 Mmp3 1.60 1437611_x_at kinesin family member 2C Kif2c 1.60 1448314_at cell division cycle 2 homolog A (S. pombe) Cdc2a 1.59 1452244_at RIKEN cDNA 6330406I15 gene 6330406I15Rik 1.59 1417267_s_at FK506 binding protein 11 Fkbp11 1.58 1436905_x_at lysosomal‐associated protein transmembrane 5 Laptm5 1.58 1417445_at NDC80 homolog, kinetochore complex component (S. cerevisiae) Ndc80 1.57 1426026_at PRP6 pre‐mRNA splicing factor 6 homolog (yeast) Prpf6 1.57 1448416_at matrix Gla protein Mgp 1.57 1448650_a_at polymerase (DNA directed), epsilon Pole 1.57 1417063_at complement component 1, q subcomponent, beta polypeptide C1qb 1.56 1452242_at centrosomal protein 55 Cep55 1.56 1452337_at RIKEN cDNA 4930427A07 gene 4930427A07Rik 1.56 1454694_a_at topoisomerase (DNA) II alpha Top2a 1.56 1418571_at tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 12a Tnfrsf12a 1.55 1424128_x_at aurora kinase B Aurkb 1.55 1425545_x_at histocompatibility 2, D region locus 1H2‐D1 1.55 1423135_at thymus cell antigen 1, theta Thy1 1.54 1430811_a_at NUF2, NDC80 kinetochore complex component, homolog (S. cerevisiae) Nuf2 1.54 1416558_at maternal embryonic leucine zipper kinase Melk 1.53 1417156_at keratin 19 Krt19 1.53 1436336_at peptidyl‐tRNA hydrolase 1 homolog (S. cerevisiae) Ptrh1 1.52 1416120_at ribonucleotide reductase M2 Rrm2 1.51 1438789_s_at dihydropyrimidinase‐like 3 Dpysl3 1.51 1452954_at ubiquitin‐conjugating enzyme E2C Ube2c 1.51 1421546_a_at Rac GTPase‐activating protein 1 Racgap1 1.50 1460330_at annexin A3 Anxa3 1.49 1424321_at replication factor C (activator 1) 4 Rfc4 1.48 1438467_at macrophage galactose N‐acetyl‐galactosamine specific lectin 2 Mgl2 1.48 1419397_at polymerase (DNA directed), alpha 1 Pola1 1.45 1452458_s_at peptidylprolyl isomerase (cyclophilin) like 5 Ppil5 1.45 1423463_a_at DNA segment, Chr 2, ERATO Doi 750, expressed D2Ertd750e 1.44 1426112_a_at CD72 antigen Cd72 1.44 1416641_at ligase I, DNA, ATP‐dependent Lig1 1.43 1415698_at golgi membrane protein 1 Golm1 1.42 1439436_x_at inner centromere protein Incenp 1.42 1449166_at S100 calcium binding protein A14 S100a14 1.42 1450862_at RAD54 like (S. cerevisiae) Rad54l 1.42 1417381_at complement component 1, q subcomponent, alpha polypeptide C1qa 1.41 1419534_at oxidized low density lipoprotein (lectin‐like) receptor 1 Olr1 1.41 1431379_a_at solute carrier family 13 (sodium/sulphate symporters), member 1 Slc13a1 1.41 1450792_at TYRO protein tyrosine kinase binding protein Tyrobp 1.41 1452598_at GINS complex subunit 1 (Psf1 homolog) Gins1 1.41 1452521_a_at plasminogen activator, urokinase receptor Plaur 1.40 1437270_a_at cardiotrophin‐like cytokine factor 1 Clcf1 1.39 1419598_at membrane‐spanning 4‐domains, subfamily A, member 6D Ms4a6d 1.38 1448393_at claudin 7 Cldn7 1.38 1453572_a_at proteolipid protein 2 Plp2 1.38 1419153_at RIKEN cDNA 2810417H13 gene 2810417H13Rik 1.37 1415923_at necdin Ndn 1.36 1417562_at eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E binding protein 1 Eif4ebp1 1.36 1418829_a_at enolase 2, gamma neuronal Eno2 1.36 1420697_at solute carrier family 15, member 3 Slc15a3 1.36 1424923_at serine (or cysteine) peptidase inhibitor, clade A, member 3G Serpina3g 1.36 1448449_at receptor‐interacting serine‐threonine kinase 3 Ripk3 1.36 1417219_s_at thymosin, beta 10 LOC100042319 1.35 1423619_at RAS, dexamethasone‐induced 1 Rasd1 1.35 1427347_s_at tubulin, beta 2a Tubb2a 1.35 1436902_x_at thymosin, beta 10 LOC100043712 1.35 1456055_x_at polymerase (DNA directed),
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reconstitution of Long and Short Patch Mismatch Repair Reactions Using Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Proteins
    Reconstitution of long and short patch mismatch repair reactions using Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins Nikki Bowena, Catherine E. Smitha, Anjana Srivatsana, Smaranda Willcoxb,c, Jack D. Griffithb,c, and Richard D. Kolodnera,d,e,f,g,1 aLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, Departments of dMedicine and eCellular and Molecular Medicine, fMoores-University of California, San Diego Cancer Center, and gInstitute of Genomic Medicine, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA 92093; and bLineberger Cancer Center and cDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 Contributed by Richard D. Kolodner, October 8, 2013 (sent for review September 9, 2013) A problem in understanding eukaryotic DNA mismatch repair In eukaryotic MMR, mispairs are bound by MutS homolog 2 (MMR) mechanisms is linking insights into MMR mechanisms from (Msh2)–MutS homolog 6 (Msh6) and Msh2–MutS homolog 3 genetics and cell-biology studies with those from biochemical (Msh3), two partially redundant complexes of MutS-related pro- studies of MMR proteins and reconstituted MMR reactions. This teins (3, 4, 18, 19). These complexes recruit a MutL-related type of analysis has proven difficult because reconstitution ap- complex, called MutL homoloh 1 (Mlh1)–postmeiotic segrega- proaches have been most successful for human MMR whereas tion 1 (Pms1) in S. cerevisiae and Mlh1–postmeiotic segregation – – analysis of MMR in vivo has been most advanced in the yeast 2 (Pms2) in human and mouse (3, 4, 20 23). The Mlh1 Pms1/ Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Here, we describe the reconstitution of Pms2 complex has an endonuclease activity suggested to play MMR reactions using purified S.
    [Show full text]
  • Paul Modrich Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
    Mechanisms in E. coli and Human Mismatch Repair Nobel Lecture, December 8, 2015 by Paul Modrich Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA. he idea that mismatched base pairs occur in cells and that such lesions trig- T ger their own repair was suggested 50 years ago by Robin Holliday in the context of genetic recombination [1]. Breakage and rejoining of DNA helices was known to occur during this process [2], with precision of rejoining attributed to formation of a heteroduplex joint, a region of helix where the two strands are derived from the diferent recombining partners. Holliday pointed out that if this heteroduplex region should span a genetic diference between the two DNAs, then it will contain one or more mismatched base pairs. He invoked processing of such mismatches to explain the recombination-associated phenomenon of gene conversion [1], noting that “If there are enzymes which can repair points of damage in DNA, it would seem possible that the same enzymes could recognize the abnormality of base pairing, and by exchange reactions rectify this.” Direct evidence that mismatches provoke a repair reaction was provided by bacterial transformation experiments [3–5], and our interest in this efect was prompted by the Escherichia coli (E. coli) work done in Matt Meselson’s lab at Harvard. Using artifcially constructed heteroduplex DNAs containing multiple mismatched base pairs, Wagner and Meselson [6] demonstrated that mismatches elicit a repair reaction upon introduction into the E. coli cell. Tey also showed that closely spaced mismatches, mismatches separated by a 1000 base pairs or so, are usually repaired on the same DNA strand.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 2. Significant
    Table 2. Significant (Q < 0.05 and |d | > 0.5) transcripts from the meta-analysis Gene Chr Mb Gene Name Affy ProbeSet cDNA_IDs d HAP/LAP d HAP/LAP d d IS Average d Ztest P values Q-value Symbol ID (study #5) 1 2 STS B2m 2 122 beta-2 microglobulin 1452428_a_at AI848245 1.75334941 4 3.2 4 3.2316485 1.07398E-09 5.69E-08 Man2b1 8 84.4 mannosidase 2, alpha B1 1416340_a_at H4049B01 3.75722111 3.87309653 2.1 1.6 2.84852656 5.32443E-07 1.58E-05 1110032A03Rik 9 50.9 RIKEN cDNA 1110032A03 gene 1417211_a_at H4035E05 4 1.66015788 4 1.7 2.82772795 2.94266E-05 0.000527 NA 9 48.5 --- 1456111_at 3.43701477 1.85785922 4 2 2.8237185 9.97969E-08 3.48E-06 Scn4b 9 45.3 Sodium channel, type IV, beta 1434008_at AI844796 3.79536664 1.63774235 3.3 2.3 2.75319499 1.48057E-08 6.21E-07 polypeptide Gadd45gip1 8 84.1 RIKEN cDNA 2310040G17 gene 1417619_at 4 3.38875643 1.4 2 2.69163229 8.84279E-06 0.0001904 BC056474 15 12.1 Mus musculus cDNA clone 1424117_at H3030A06 3.95752801 2.42838452 1.9 2.2 2.62132809 1.3344E-08 5.66E-07 MGC:67360 IMAGE:6823629, complete cds NA 4 153 guanine nucleotide binding protein, 1454696_at -3.46081884 -4 -1.3 -1.6 -2.6026947 8.58458E-05 0.0012617 beta 1 Gnb1 4 153 guanine nucleotide binding protein, 1417432_a_at H3094D02 -3.13334396 -4 -1.6 -1.7 -2.5946297 1.04542E-05 0.0002202 beta 1 Gadd45gip1 8 84.1 RAD23a homolog (S.
    [Show full text]
  • Phosphate Steering by Flap Endonuclease 1 Promotes 50-flap Specificity and Incision to Prevent Genome Instability
    ARTICLE Received 18 Jan 2017 | Accepted 5 May 2017 | Published 27 Jun 2017 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15855 OPEN Phosphate steering by Flap Endonuclease 1 promotes 50-flap specificity and incision to prevent genome instability Susan E. Tsutakawa1,*, Mark J. Thompson2,*, Andrew S. Arvai3,*, Alexander J. Neil4,*, Steven J. Shaw2, Sana I. Algasaier2, Jane C. Kim4, L. David Finger2, Emma Jardine2, Victoria J.B. Gotham2, Altaf H. Sarker5, Mai Z. Her1, Fahad Rashid6, Samir M. Hamdan6, Sergei M. Mirkin4, Jane A. Grasby2 & John A. Tainer1,7 DNA replication and repair enzyme Flap Endonuclease 1 (FEN1) is vital for genome integrity, and FEN1 mutations arise in multiple cancers. FEN1 precisely cleaves single-stranded (ss) 50-flaps one nucleotide into duplex (ds) DNA. Yet, how FEN1 selects for but does not incise the ss 50-flap was enigmatic. Here we combine crystallographic, biochemical and genetic analyses to show that two dsDNA binding sites set the 50polarity and to reveal unexpected control of the DNA phosphodiester backbone by electrostatic interactions. Via ‘phosphate steering’, basic residues energetically steer an inverted ss 50-flap through a gateway over FEN1’s active site and shift dsDNA for catalysis. Mutations of these residues cause an 18,000-fold reduction in catalytic rate in vitro and large-scale trinucleotide (GAA)n repeat expansions in vivo, implying failed phosphate-steering promotes an unanticipated lagging-strand template-switch mechanism during replication. Thus, phosphate steering is an unappreciated FEN1 function that enforces 50-flap specificity and catalysis, preventing genomic instability. 1 Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • S Na P S H O T: D N a Mism a Tc H R E P a Ir
    SnapShot: Repair DNA Mismatch Scott A. Lujan, and Thomas Kunkel A. Larrea, Andres Park, NC 27709, USA Triangle Health Sciences, NIH, DHHS, Research National Institutes of Environmental 730 Cell 141, May 14, 2010 ©2010 Elsevier Inc. DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.002 See online version for legend and references. SnapShot: DNA Mismatch Repair Andres A. Larrea, Scott A. Lujan, and Thomas A. Kunkel National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, DHHS, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA Mismatch Repair in Bacteria and Eukaryotes Mismatch repair in the bacterium Escherichia coli is initiated when a homodimer of MutS binds as an asymmetric clamp to DNA containing a variety of base-base and insertion-deletion mismatches. The MutL homodimer then couples MutS recognition to the signal that distinguishes between the template and nascent DNA strands. In E. coli, the lack of adenine methylation, catalyzed by the DNA adenine methyltransferase (Dam) in newly synthesized GATC sequences, allows E. coli MutH to cleave the nascent strand. The resulting nick is used for mismatch removal involving the UvrD helicase, single-strand DNA-binding protein (SSB), and excision by single-stranded DNA exonucleases from either direction, depending upon the polarity of the nick relative to the mismatch. DNA polymerase III correctly resynthesizes DNA and ligase completes repair. In bacteria lacking Dam/MutH, as in eukaryotes, the signal for strand discrimination is uncertain but may be the DNA ends associated with replication forks. In these bacteria, MutL harbors a nick-dependent endonuclease that creates a nick that can be used for mismatch excision. Eukaryotic mismatch repair is similar, although it involves several dif- ferent MutS and MutL homologs: MutSα (MSH2/MSH6) recognizes single base-base mismatches and 1–2 base insertion/deletions; MutSβ (MSH2/MSH3) recognizes insertion/ deletion mismatches containing two or more extra bases.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 SUPPLEMENTAL DATA Figure S1. Poly I:C Induces IFN-Β Expression
    SUPPLEMENTAL DATA Figure S1. Poly I:C induces IFN-β expression and signaling. Fibroblasts were incubated in media with or without Poly I:C for 24 h. RNA was isolated and processed for microarray analysis. Genes showing >2-fold up- or down-regulation compared to control fibroblasts were analyzed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis Software (Red color, up-regulation; Green color, down-regulation). The transcripts with known gene identifiers (HUGO gene symbols) were entered into the Ingenuity Pathways Knowledge Base IPA 4.0. Each gene identifier mapped in the Ingenuity Pathways Knowledge Base was termed as a focus gene, which was overlaid into a global molecular network established from the information in the Ingenuity Pathways Knowledge Base. Each network contained a maximum of 35 focus genes. 1 Figure S2. The overlap of genes regulated by Poly I:C and by IFN. Bioinformatics analysis was conducted to generate a list of 2003 genes showing >2 fold up or down- regulation in fibroblasts treated with Poly I:C for 24 h. The overlap of this gene set with the 117 skin gene IFN Core Signature comprised of datasets of skin cells stimulated by IFN (Wong et al, 2012) was generated using Microsoft Excel. 2 Symbol Description polyIC 24h IFN 24h CXCL10 chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 10 129 7.14 CCL5 chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 5 118 1.12 CCL5 chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 5 115 1.01 OASL 2'-5'-oligoadenylate synthetase-like 83.3 9.52 CCL8 chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 8 78.5 3.25 IDO1 indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 76.3 3.5 IFI27 interferon, alpha-inducible
    [Show full text]
  • Three Prime Repair Exonuclease 1 (TREX1) Expression Correlates with Cervical Cancer Cells Growth in Vitro and Disease Progressio
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Three Prime Repair Exonuclease 1 (TREX1) expression correlates with cervical cancer cells growth in vitro Received: 11 December 2017 Accepted: 17 October 2018 and disease progression in vivo Published: xx xx xxxx Bruna Prati1, Walason da Silva Abjaude1, Lara Termini2, Mirian Morale3, Suellen Herbster1, Adhemar Longatto-Filho4,5,6, Rafaella Almeida Lima Nunes2, Lizeth Carolina Córdoba Camacho1,11,12, Silvia Helena Rabelo-Santos7, Luiz Carlos Zeferino 8, Francisco Aguayo9,10 & Enrique Boccardo 1 Alterations in specifc DNA damage repair mechanisms in the presence of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection have been described in diferent experimental models. However, the global efect of HPV on the expression of genes involved in these pathways has not been analyzed in detail. In the present study, we compared the expression profle of 135 genes involved in DNA damage repair among primary human keratinocytes (PHK), HPV-positive (SiHa and HeLa) and HPV-negative (C33A) cervical cancer derived cell lines. We identifed 9 genes which expression pattern distinguishes HPV-positive tumor cell lines from C33A. Moreover, we observed that Three Prime Repair Exonuclease 1 (TREX1) expression is upregulated exclusively in HPV-transformed cell lines and PHK expressing HPV16 E6 and E7 oncogenes. We demonstrated that TREX1 silencing greatly afects tumor cells clonogenic and anchorage independent growth potential. We showed that this efect is associated with p53 upregulation, accumulation of subG1 cells, and requires the expression of E7 from high-risk HPV types. Finally, we observed an increase in TREX1 levels in precancerous lesions, squamous carcinomas and adenocarcinomas clinical samples. Altogether, our results indicate that TREX1 upregulation is important for cervical tumor cells growth and may contribute with tumor establishment and progression.
    [Show full text]
  • And Exo1 Interaction
    Biochemical Characterization of Human Exonuclease 1 Protein-protein Interactions by Lei Mao Department of Biochemistry Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Lorena Beese, Supervisor ___________________________ Richard Brennan ___________________________ Michael Boyce ___________________________ Dennis Thiele Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Department of Biochemistry in the Graduate School of Duke University 2016 i v ABSTRACT Biochemical Characterization of Human Exonuclease 1 Protein-protein Interactions by Lei Mao Department of Biochemistry Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Lorena Beese, Supervisor ___________________________ Richard Brennan ___________________________ Michael Boyce ___________________________ Dennis Thiele An abstract of a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Department of Biochemistry in the Graduate School of Duke University 2016 i v Copyright by Lei Mao 2016 Abstract Human Exonuclease 1 (Exo1) plays important roles in numerous DNA metabolic/repair pathways including DNA mismatch repair, DNA double strand break repair, Okazaki fragment maturation. The nuclease activity of Exo1 is tightly regulated in vivo. The regulation of Exo1 in different pathways is achieved by interactions with different protein partners. The focus of this dissertation will be on characterization of Exo1 interactions
    [Show full text]
  • The Devil Is in the Details for DNA Mismatch Repair COMMENTARY
    COMMENTARY The Devil is in the details for DNA mismatch repair COMMENTARY Peggy Hsieha,1 and Yongliang Zhanga Ensuring high-fidelity DNA replication is essential a strand-specific signal for excision can be far apart) (7–9). for maintaining genome stability in organisms from MMR in eukaryotes features two families of MMR pro- Escherichia coli to humans. This task requires an intricate teins, heterodimeric homologs of bacterial MutS (MSH) network of cellular components that carries out replica- or MutL (MLH). Early models of E. coli MMR invoke tion and postreplication DNA repair (1). In eukaryotes, MMR protein-mediated DNA looping between a mis- replication is carried out by Pol e and Pol δ that synthesize match and a DNA-methylation excision signal or ATP- the leading and lagging strands, respectively, using short driven MutS translocation along the DNA. The nucleotide RNA–DNA primers synthesized by Pol α. Although repli- switch model posits the existence of multiple diffusing cation gives rise to a low spontaneous mutation rate of MSH–MLH clamps (8). Other studies suggest that a single − ∼10 10 mutations per base pair per generation, errors in MSH clamp at a mismatch can load multiple MLH clamps the nucleotide incorporation step occur about once every to license excision (1, 9). MutSα (MSH2-MSH6) and MutSβ + 104 to 105 insertions on average, although the frequency (MSH2-MSH3) are related to the AAA family of ATPases varies considerably depending on a number of parame- and carry out mismatch recognition (10, 11). MutL homo- ters including the particular mismatch, chromosomal con- logs MutLα (yeast ScMlh1-Pms1 and human HsMLH1- text, and the DNA polymerase.
    [Show full text]
  • Exonuclease Activity and Removal of Bulky
    Insight into mechanisms of 3′-5′ exonuclease activity PNAS PLUS and removal of bulky 8,5′-cyclopurine adducts by apurinic/apyrimidinic endonucleases Abdelghani Mazouzia, Armelle Vigourouxb, Bulat Aikesheva,c, Philip J. Brooksd,e, Murat K. Saparbaeva, Solange Morerab,1, and Alexander A. Ishchenkoa,1 aUniversité Paris-Sud, Laboratoire “Stabilité Génétique et Oncogenèse”, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Unité Mixte de Recherche 8200, Institut de Cancérologie Gustave-Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif Cedex, France; bLaboratoire d’Enzymologie et Biochimie Structurales, CNRS, F-91198 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France; cL.N. Gumilev Eurasian National University, Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan, 010008; and dLaboratory of Neurogenetics and Division of Metabolism and Health Effects, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, eOffice of Rare Diseases Research, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892 Edited by Philip C. Hanawalt, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, and approved June 28, 2013 (received for review March 19, 2013) 8,5′-cyclo-2’-deoxyadenosine (cdA) and 8,5′-cyclo-2’-deoxyguano- compared with regular dA, implying that this base lesion would sine generated in DNA by both endogenous oxidative stress and be resistant to DNA glycosylase action (3). ionizing radiation are helix-distorting lesions and strong blocks for The cdA adducts in DNA are a strong block to various DNA DNA replication and transcription. In duplex DNA, these lesions are polymerases, such as T7, δ, and η (4). Interestingly, translesion repaired in the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway. How- DNA polymerase η can perform lesion bypass synthesis on the ever, lesions at DNA strand breaks are most likely poor substrates R-cdA but not on S-cdA (5).
    [Show full text]
  • Exo1 Recruits Cdc5 Polo Kinase to Mutlγ to Ensure Efficient Meiotic Crossover Formation
    Exo1 recruits Cdc5 polo kinase to MutLγ to ensure efficient meiotic crossover formation Aurore Sancheza,b,c, Céline Adama,b, Felix Rauhd, Yann Duroca,b, Lepakshi Ranjhac, Bérangère Lombarde, Xiaojing Muf,g, Mélody Wintreberta,b, Damarys Loewe, Alba Guarnéh, Stefano Gnana,b, Chun-Long Chena,b, Scott Keeneyf,g,i, Petr Cejkac, Raphaël Guéroisj, Franz Kleind, Jean-Baptiste Charbonnierj, and Valérie Bordea,b,1 aInstitut Curie, Paris Sciences et Lettres Research University, CNRS, UMR3244, 75005 Paris, France; bParis Sorbonne Université, UMR3244, 75005 Paris, France; cInstitute for Research in Biomedicine, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, 6501 Bellinzona, Switzerland; dMax F. Perutz Laboratories, University of Vienna, 1010 Wien, Austria; eInstitut Curie, Paris Sciences et Lettres Research University, 75006 Paris, France; fMolecular Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065; gWeill Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Cornell University, New York, NY 10065; hDepartment of Biochemistry, Centre de Recherche en Biologie Structurale, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada; iMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, New York, NY 10065; and jInstitute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique, CNRS, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France Edited by Anne M. Villeneuve, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, and approved October 14, 2020 (received for review July 7, 2020) Crossovers generated during the repair of programmed meiotic recruits a MutL-related complex to initiate repair together with double-strand breaks must be tightly regulated to promote accu- proliferating cell nuclear antigen and Exo1 (reviewed in ref. 11). rate homolog segregation without deleterious outcomes, such as MutLα represents the major mismatch repair activity, which in- aneuploidy.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Exonuclease 1 (EXO1) Regulatory Functions in DNA Replication with Putative Roles in Cancer
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Human Exonuclease 1 (EXO1) Regulatory Functions in DNA Replication with Putative Roles in Cancer Guido Keijzers 1,* , Daniela Bakula 1, Michael Angelo Petr 1,2, Nils Gedsig Kirkelund Madsen 1, Amanuel Teklu 1, Garik Mkrtchyan 1, Brenna Osborne 1 and Morten Scheibye-Knudsen 1 1 Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Center for Healthy Aging, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200 Copenhagen, Denmark; [email protected] (D.B.); [email protected] (M.A.P.); [email protected] (N.G.K.M.); [email protected] (A.T.); [email protected] (G.M.); [email protected] (B.O.); [email protected] (M.S.-K.) 2 Experimental Gerontology Section, Translational Gerontology Branch, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +45-29-17-65-32 Received: 20 November 2018; Accepted: 19 December 2018; Published: 25 December 2018 Abstract: Human exonuclease 1 (EXO1), a 50!30 exonuclease, contributes to the regulation of the cell cycle checkpoints, replication fork maintenance, and post replicative DNA repair pathways. These processes are required for the resolution of stalled or blocked DNA replication that can lead to replication stress and potential collapse of the replication fork. Failure to restart the DNA replication process can result in double-strand breaks, cell-cycle arrest, cell death, or cellular transformation. In this review, we summarize the involvement of EXO1 in the replication, DNA repair pathways, cell cycle checkpoints, and the link between EXO1 and cancer. Keywords: DNA repair; double strand break repair; exonuclease 1; EXO1; mismatch repair; MMR; NER; nucleotide excision repair; strand displacements; TLS; translesion DNA synthesis 1.
    [Show full text]