Prosecutor V Milorad Krnojelac to Trial Chamber II, 17 June 1998

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Prosecutor V Milorad Krnojelac to Trial Chamber II, 17 June 1998 UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Case No.: IT-97-25-T Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Date: 15 March 2002 Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia Original: English Since 1991 IN TRIAL CHAMBER II Before: Judge David Hunt, Presiding Judge Florence Ndepele Mwachande Mumba Judge Liu Daqun Registrar: Mr Hans Holthuis Judgment of: 15 March 2002 PROSECUTOR v. MILORAD KRNOJELAC JUDGMENT Counsel for the Prosecutor: Ms Hildegard Uertz-Retzlaff Ms Peggy Kuo Mr William Smith Counsel for the Accused: Mr Mihajlo Bakrac Mr Miroslav Vasi} 1 Case No: IT-97-25-T 15 March 2002 I. SUMMARY OF THE CHARGES............................................................................. 4 II. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3 AND ARTICLE 5 OF THE STATUTE........................................................................................................... 7 A. Facts relevant to the general requirements of Article 3 and Article 5 of the Statute 7 B. General requirements under Article 3 of the Statute .............................................. 20 C. General requirements under Article 5 of the Statute .............................................. 21 D. Findings in respect of the general requirements of Articles 3 and 5 of the Statute 24 III. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE......................................................................................................... 27 IV. INDIVIDUAL CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY AND SUPERIOR RESPONSIBILITY................................................................................................... 30 A. Individual criminal responsibility under Article 7(1) of the Statute ...................... 30 1. Joint criminal enterprise ..................................................................................... 32 2. Aiding and abetting............................................................................................. 36 B. Superior responsibility under Article 7(3) of the Statute........................................ 37 V. THE ACCUSED'S POSITION AS WARDEN……………………………………39 VI. CRIMES UNDER ARTICLE 3 AND ARTICLE 5 OF THE STATUTE............ 50 A. Imprisonment........................................................................................................ 50 1. The law ............................................................................................................... 50 2. Findings: the imprisonment of non-Serb men at the KP Dom ........................... 53 3. The responsibility of the Accused ...................................................................... 57 B. Inhumane acts and cruel treatment.................................................................... 60 1. The law ............................................................................................................... 60 2. Findings .............................................................................................................. 61 3. The responsibility of the Accused ...................................................................... 74 C. Cruel treatment, inhumane acts and torture ..................................................... 77 1. The law ............................................................................................................... 77 (a) Cruel treatment and inhumane acts .............................................................. 77 (b) Torture.......................................................................................................... 78 2. Findings .............................................................................................................. 82 (a) Cruel treatment and inhumane acts (par 5.4 to 5.16) ................................... 82 (i) Beatings upon arrival in the prison yard (par 5.4 to 5.6).......................... 82 (ii) Beatings associated with the canteen (par 5.7 to 5.16) ........................... 83 (iii) Beatings in Schedule A .......................................................................... 87 (b) Torture, cruel treatment and inhumane acts (par 5.17 to 5.29) .................... 89 (i) Torture and beatings as punishment (par 5.17 to 5.21) ............................ 89 (ii) Torture and beatings during interrogations (par 5.22 to 5.29) ................ 96 (iii) Torture and beatings in Schedule B ..................................................... 105 3. The responsibility of the Accused .................................................................... 123 D. Murder................................................................................................................. 129 1. The law ............................................................................................................. 130 2. Findings: Schedule C killings........................................................................... 132 3. The responsibility of the Accused .................................................................... 141 2 Case No: IT-97-25-T 15 March 2002 E. Enslavement ........................................................................................................ 144 1. The law ............................................................................................................. 144 2. Findings ............................................................................................................ 149 (a) Par 5.41 and forced labour.......................................................................... 149 (b) Par 5.42 and forced labour ......................................................................... 152 (c) Par 5.43 and forced labour.......................................................................... 156 (d) Par 5.44 and forced labour ......................................................................... 164 (e) Par 5.45 and forced labour.......................................................................... 172 (f) Findings with respect to remaining allegations of forced labour................ 175 (g) Remaining Schedule E detainees and forced labour .................................. 178 3. The responsibility of the Accused .................................................................... 179 F. Persecution........................................................................................................... 180 1. The law ............................................................................................................. 180 2. Findings ............................................................................................................ 184 (a) Imprisonment as persecution...................................................................... 184 (b) Inhumane conditions as persecution .......................................................... 185 (c) Torture, inhumane acts and cruel treatment as persecution ....................... 187 (d) Killing as persecution................................................................................. 195 (e) Forced labour as persecution ...................................................................... 196 (f) Deportation and expulsion as persecution .................................................. 197 3. The responsibility of the Accused .................................................................... 204 VII. SENTENCING CONSIDERATIONS................................................................... 211 VIII. DISPOSITION......................................................................................................... 228 A. Sentence..................................................................................................................... 228 B. Credit for Time Served.............................................................................................. 229 ANNEX I : GLOSSARY OF TERMS............................................................................. 230 ANNEX II – PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND........................................................... 235 A. Pre–trial phase........................................................................................................... 235 B. The trial phase ........................................................................................................... 236 3 Case No: IT-97-25-T 15 March 2002 I. SUMMARY OF THE CHARGES 1. Milorad Krnojelac (“Accused”) is charged under the third amended indictment (“Indictment”), dated 25 June 2001, with 12 counts.1 2. The Prosecution alleges that, on 7 April 1992, Serb military forces began the occupation of Fo~a town. The occupation was completed on 16 or 17 April 1992. Once the Serb forces had gained control over parts of Fo~a town, military police, accompanied by local and non-local soldiers, started to arrest Muslim and other non-Serb inhabitants. Men and women were separated and arrested. Beginning on or around 14 April 1992, the Fo~a Kazneno-Popravni Dom (“KP Dom”), a prison, became the primary detention centre for Muslim and other non-Serb men, as well as for a few Serbs who had tried to avoid military service. The Prosecution alleges that the KP Dom was overcrowded during the first few months due to the continuing arrests, most of the detainees being civilians who had not been charged with any crime. 3. The Prosecution alleges that the Accused was the commander of the KP Dom from April 1992 until August 1993, and that as such he was responsible for running the detention camp. He was in a position of superior authority with respect to
Recommended publications
  • Makitalo Vaitoskirja Netti.Pdf (3.261Mt)
    CCCC MMM YYYYCMCMCMCMMYMYMYMYCYCYCYCMYCYCMYCMYCMYKKK K Janne Mäkitalo Janne Mäkitalo Janne Mäkitalo Janne Mäkitalo JanneJanneJanneJanne Mäkitalo MäkitaloMäkitalo Mäkitalo PARTISAANISODASTA ALUEELLISEEN PUOLUSTUSJÄRJESTELMÄÄN PARTISAANISODASTA ALUEELLISEEN PUOLUSTUSJÄRJESTELMÄÄN ALUEELLISEEN PUOLUSTUSJÄRJESTELMÄÄN PARTISAANISODASTA PARTISAANISODASTA ALUEELLISEEN PUOLUSTUSJÄRJESTELMÄÄN PARTISAANISODASTA PARTISAANISODASTAPARTISAANISODASTAPARTISAANISODASTAPARTISAANISODASTA ALUEELLISEENALUEELLISEENALUEELLISEEN ALUEELLISEEN PUOLUSTUSJÄRJESTELMÄÄNPUOLUSTUSJÄRJESTELMÄÄNPUOLUSTUSJÄRJESTELMÄÄNPUOLUSTUSJÄRJESTELMÄÄN JUGOSLAVIALAISENJUGOSLAVIALAISENJUGOSLAVIALAISENJUGOSLAVIALAISEN SOTATAIDOLLISEN SOTATAIDOLLISENSOTATAIDOLLISEN SOTATAIDOLLISEN AJATTELUN AJATTELUNAJATTELUN AJATTELUN KEHITTYMINENKEHITTYMINENKEHITTYMINENKEHITTYMINEN TOISEN TOISENTOISEN TOISEN MAAILMANSODAN MAAILMANSODANMAAILMANSODAN MAAILMANSODAN JÄLKEEN JÄLKEENJÄLKEEN JÄLKEEN Julkaisusarja 1 N:o 16 Julkaisusarja 1 N:o 16 Julkaisusarja 1 N:o 16 Julkaisusarja 1 N:o 16 ISBN 9789512523306ISBNISBNISBN 9789512523306 9789512523306 9789512523306 ISSN 14565196ISSNISSNISSN 14565196 14565196 14565196 MaanpuolustuskorkeakouluMaanpuolustuskorkeakouluMaanpuolustuskorkeakouluMaanpuolustuskorkeakoulu www.mpkk/mil.fiwww.mpkk/mil.fiwww.mpkk/mil.fiwww.mpkk/mil.fi Sotahistorian SotahistorianlaitosSotahistorianSotahistorian laitos laitos laitos PL 7 PLPLPL 7 7 7 MaanpuolustuskorkeakouluMaanpuolustuskorkeakouluMaanpuolustuskorkeakouluMaanpuolustuskorkeakouluJulkaisusarjaJulkaisusarjaJulkaisusarjaJulkaisusarja
    [Show full text]
  • Partisans and Chetniks in Occupied Yugoslavia by Heather Williams – a Commentary by Gaj Trifković
    Gaj Trifković: Zašto je pogrešno javni institut za povijest nazvati imenom Franje Tuđmana GAJ TRIFKOVIĆ Sarajevo Partisans and Chetniks in occupied Yugoslavia by Heather Williams – A Commentary by Gaj Trifković Being a historian of the region, I naturally welcomed the publishing of The Routled- ge Handbook of Balkan and Southeast European History in October 2020 (for more information on this edited volume see https://www.routledge.com/The-Routled- ge-Handbook-of-Balkan-and-Southeast-European-History/Lampe-Brunnbauer/p/ book/9781138613089). Whereas the vast majority of the contributions contained in the volume fall outside my area of expertise, I feel there are a number of points in He- ather Williams’ piece „Partisans And Chetniks in occupied Yugoslavia“ that need to be addressed in some detail. Let’s start: • p. 392: „The Independent State of Croatia (the NDH) had already adhered to the Tripartite Pact on April 10 and withdrawn from hostilities.“ The NDH was proclaimed on 10 April 1941; it would officially join the -Tri partite Pact only on 15 June 1941. (Bogdan Krizman, „Pavelić između Hitlera i Musolinija“, Zagreb, Globus, 1980, p. 76). • p. 393: „In Serbia, the German invasion of the USSR on June 11, combined with feelings of outrage at the suffering of fellow Orthodox Christians arriving as refugees from the NDH, produced a spontaneous rising, encouraged by the withdrawal of many German frontline divisions to the east.“ The invasion of the USSR began on 22 June 1941. Unlike the sudden, violent, and largely spontaneous uprisings in Montenegro and the NDH, the uprising in Serbia was a much more gradual, snowball- effect affair, set in motion by the Communists.
    [Show full text]
  • Areas with Natural Constraints in South-East Europe: Assessment
    Areas with Natural Constraints in South-East Europe: Assessment and Policy Recommendations Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, Rural Development through Integrated Forest and Water Resources Management in Southeast Europe (LEIWW), Antonie Grubisic 5, 1000 Skopje, Macedonia Regional Rural Development Standing Working Group in SEE (SWG) Blvd. Goce Delcev 18, MRTV Building, 12th floor, 1000 Skopje, Macedonia The analysis, conclusions and recommendations in this paper represent the opinion of the authors and are not necessarily representative of the position of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH and the Regional Rural Development Standing Working Group in SEE (SWG). Edited by: Pandi Zdruli and Ordan Cukaliev AREAS WITH NATURAL CONSTRAINTS IN SOUTH-EAST EUROPE - ASSESSMENT AND POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS List of abbreviations...............................................................................................................................5 Foreword and Acknowledgements........................................................................................................6 A message from CIHEAM and Bari Institute..........................................................................................8 Background information, methodology applied for the assessment and experts and institutions involved.........................................................................................................................9 PART A: REGIONAL ASPECTS..........................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Snimajuce-Lokacije.Pdf
    Elma Tataragić Tina Šmalcelj Bosnia and Herzegovina Filmmakers’ Location Guide Sarajevo, 2017 Contents WHY BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 3 FACTS AND FIGURES 7 GOOD TO KNOW 11 WHERE TO SHOOT 15 UNA-SANA Canton / Unsko-sanski kanton 17 POSAVINA CANTON / Posavski kanton 27 Tuzla Canton / Tuzlanski kanton 31 Zenica-DoboJ Canton / Zeničko-doboJski kanton 37 BOSNIAN PODRINJE CANTON / Bosansko-podrinJski kanton 47 CENTRAL BOSNIA CANTON / SrednJobosanski kanton 53 Herzegovina-neretva canton / Hercegovačko-neretvanski kanton 63 West Herzegovina Canton / Zapadnohercegovački kanton 79 CANTON 10 / Kanton br. 10 87 SARAJEVO CANTON / Kanton SaraJevo 93 EAST SARAJEVO REGION / REGION Istočno SaraJevo 129 BANJA LUKA REGION / BanJalučka regiJA 139 BIJELJina & DoboJ Region / DoboJsko-biJELJinska regiJA 149 TREBINJE REGION / TrebinJska regiJA 155 BRčKO DISTRICT / BRčKO DISTRIKT 163 INDUSTRY GUIDE WHAT IS OUR RECORD 168 THE ASSOCIATION OF FILMMAKERS OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 169 BH FILM 2001 – 2016 170 IMPORTANT INSTITUTIONS 177 CO-PRODUCTIONS 180 NUMBER OF FILMS PRODUCED 184 NUMBER OF SHORT FILMS PRODUCED 185 ADMISSIONS & BOX OFFICE 186 INDUSTRY ADDRESS BOOK 187 FILM SCHOOLS 195 FILM FESTIVALS 196 ADDITIONAL INFO EMBASSIES 198 IMPORTANT PHONE NUMBERS 204 WHERE TO STAY 206 1 Why BiH WHY BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA • Unspoiled natural locations including a wide range of natu- ral sites from mountains to seaside • Proximity of different natural sites ranging from sea coast to high mountains • Presence of all four seasons in all their beauty • War ruins which can be used
    [Show full text]
  • Public Sector Appointments 'Generally Politicised'
    T Maja resurface. sector public the in cronyism alleged over concerns while eyebrows, raises Agency Security Serbian the of ashead appointment minister’s former A sacked politicised’ ‘generally appointments sector Public ment at a press conference last week. last conference apress at ment appoint the confirming when backing hisfull Gasić gave Vučić Aleksandar criteria. application stricter to be subject therefore, and, political non- as bereclassified should sitions po company state-owned and public senior some that isconcern there net, cabi the by decided usually are ments appoint and position, apolitical ered Serbia. in many BIA,hassurprised Agency, rity of the Serbian Secu asdirector gaffe, ist President and former Prime Minister Prime Minister former and President isconsid BIAdirectorship the While ŽIVANOVIĆ ŽIVANOVIĆ was sacked for making asex making for sacked was who minister defence former the Gasić, Bratislav appoint to decision government’s he Krunić: The Serbian The Krunić: +381 11 4030 306 114030 +381 artist in search of of insearch artist conversation - - - - - - - a press event in January 2016. inJanuary event a press at cameraman her of way the of out get to down knelt had who TVB92, from Labović Zlatija reporter to knees easily" their on down get who journalists male fe "Ilove said he when ajournalist to insult asexist making for known best security". and defence of world inthe everything knows who man him"a calling qualities, has many Gasić that added He said. SNS, Party, SerbianProgressive the party, ment govern coalition senior the of is head who Vučić, is," he sure I amabsolutely Gasić, a senior SNS party official, is official, party SNS asenior Gasić, this? for competent Gasić "Is Bratislav Continued on on Continued Page 9 [email protected] Issue No.
    [Show full text]
  • Isirr 2003 Hungary – Serbia & Montenegro – Romania 2
    VIIth INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM INTERDISCIPLINARY REGIONAL RESEARCH - ISIRR 2003 HUNGARY – SERBIA & MONTENEGRO – ROMANIA Hunedoara, ROMANIA 25th – 26th, September, 2003 Section IV – USES OF NATURAL RESOURCES IN REGIONS - 25th September, 2003 25th September, 2003 1100 - 1300 1500 - 1900 26th September, 2003 1100 - 1300 “SIDERURGISTUL” CLUB - AMPHITHEATER No.1 – HUNEDOARA Ştefan MAKSAY – President & Chairman Gallia BUTNARU – Member Cosmina ANDRĂŞESCU – Member Name of the Authors Title of Presented Papers 0401. Sanja O. Synthesys and Antimicrobial Activity of PODUNAVAC-KUZMANOVIĆ, Copper (II), Cobalt (II) and Nickel (II) Ljiljana VOJINOVIĆ, Complexes with 2-Aminobenzimidazole Dragoljub M. CVETKOVIĆ - SERBIA & MONTENEGRO 0402. Sonja M. DJILAS, 2,2' - Diphenyl-1 - Picrylhydrazyl Radical- Jasna M. ČANADANOVIC- Scavenging Activity of Different Teucrium BRUNET, Montanum L. Extracts Gordana S. ĆETKOVIC, Vesna T. TUMBAS - SERBIA & MONTENEGRO 0403. Sanja O. Physico-Chemical Characterisation And PODUNAVAC-KUZMANOVIĆ, Biological Activity Of Zinc (II) Complexes Gordana S. ĆETKOVIĆ, With 2-Amino and 2-Methylbenzimidazole Dragoljub M. CVETKOVIĆ Derivatives - SERBIA & MONTENEGRO 0404. Atila SALVAI, Present State of Flood Control and Water Pavel BENKA Streams Improvement in Voivodina - SERBIA & MONTENEGRO 15 0405. Dorina MODRA, Esterification and Polyesterification Reactions Cosmina ANDRAŞESCU, With Industrial Applications. Polyesters Ramona OPROIU, Obtained from Mixture of Dicarboxilic Acids Remus NUŢIU – ROMANIA and Diols 0406. LÁSZLÓ, Zs., Colour Changes of Dried Onion Treated HALÁSZ-FEKETE, M. Irradiation and Ozonation HERCZEG-BARA, O. FEHÉR, L. KISPÉTER, J. - HUNGARY 0407. D. OBREHT, Glu-1 And Glu-3 Allelic Variability of Genus M. DAVIDOVIC, Triticum – Genetic Resources in Wheat Lj. VAPA Breeding - SERBIA & MONTENEGRO 0408. Lj. VAPA, The Presence and the Origin of 1bl/1rs M. DAVIDOVIC, Translocation in Bread Wheat Cultivars Bred D.
    [Show full text]
  • Socio-Economic Data of Sumadija and Pomoravlje
    SSOOCCIIOO--EECCOONNOOMMIICC DDAATTAA OOFF SSUUMMAADDIIJJAA AANNDD PPOOMMOORRAAVVLLJJEE The basic geographic and historical data Geography and topography Region of Sumadija and Pomoravlje is located in the central part of the Republic of Serbia, in between big rivers the Sava and the Danube in the north, the Great Morava in the east, the Western Morava in the west. Sumadija and Pomoravlje consist of following areas: Temnic, Levac, Gruza, Belica, Lepenica, Jasenica, Takovo, Kacer, Kosmaj, Belgrade and Smederevo Danube Region. The total area of the region is 5001km2, which makes 5.6% of the total area of the Republic of Serbia. On this territory, according to the last official census, conducted 2011th live 507 844 people, and the average population density of 101 inhabitants per km2. Proportion of population Sumadije and Pomoravlje in the total population of the Republic of Serbia is 7%. Region of Sumadija and Pomoravlje consists of two districts: Sumadija and Pomoravlje. Sumadija District includes the City of Kragujevac and six municipalities: Arandjelovac, Batocina, Lapovo, Knic, Raca and Topola. Total area of Sumadija District is 2.387 km2, of which 835 km2 covers the City of Kragujevac that is also the largest settlement in the Region. Population of Sumadija District is 298.778 inhabitants with average density of 125 Inhabitants/km2. Pomoravlje district make the city Jagodina and five municipalities Despotovac Paracin, Rekovac, Svilajnac and Ćuprija. With a total area of 2617km2 and 214536 inhabitants, Pomoravlje district has an average population density of 82 inhabitants per km2. The City of Kragujevac is the largest Viewing area of municipalities of Sumadia and city in the territory of Sumadije and Pomoravlje region ( km2) Pomoravlje, and reresent the 900 835 800 administrative, economic, cultural, 700 623 542 educational and health center of the 600 470 413 500 376 356 366 entire region Sumadije and Pomoravlje 400 326 287 300 216 and central Serbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Case No. IT-02-54-T in the TRIAL CHAMBER Before
    file://///cs/WWork/Ictysite/milosevic/trialc/judgement/040616.htm Case No. IT-02-54-T IN THE TRIAL CHAMBER Before: Judge Patrick Robinson, Presiding Judge O-Gon Kwon Judge Iain Bonomy Registrar: Mr. Hans Holthuis Decision: 16 June 2004 PROSECUTOR v. SLOBODAN MILOSEVIC __________________________________ DECISION ON MOTION FOR JUDGEMENT OF ACQUITTAL __________________________________ The Office of the Prosecutor Ms. Carla Del Ponte Mr. Geoffrey Nice Mr. Dermot Groome Ms. Hildegard Uertz-Retzlaff The Accused Mr. Slobodan Milosevic Amici Curiae Mr. Steven Kay, QC Prof. Timothy L.H. McCormack I. GLOSSARY A. Abbreviations and Acronyms B/C/S Abbreviation B/C/S English English Abbreviation BHS Bosnanski/Hrvatski Bosnian/Croatian B/C/S; BCS /Srpski /Serbian BiH Bosna i Hercegovina Bosnia and BH Herzegovina DB drzavna bezbednost state security DB 1 of 102 20/03/2009 11:54 AM file://///cs/WWork/Ictysite/milosevic/trialc/judgement/040616.htm EU Evropska unija European Union EU EZ Evropska zajednica European EC Community FBiH Federacija Bosne i Federation of Bosnia FBiH Hercegovine and Herzegovina JATD Jedinica za Anti-Terrorist JATD antiteroristicko Operations Unit dejstvo/delovanje JNA Jugoslovenska Yugoslav People’s JNA narodna armija Army JSO Jedinica za specijalne Special Operations JSO operacije Unit KMP; ILC Komisija za International Law ILC medjunarodno pravo Commission LDK; DSK Demokratski savez Democratic Alliance/ LDK Kosova Democratic League of Kosovo MKCK Medjunarodni International ICRC komitet crvenog Committee of the krsta Red Cross
    [Show full text]
  • The World of Natural and Cultural Heritage of Republic of Srpska
    International Journal of Cultural and Digital Tourism Volume 2, Number 2, Autumn 2015 Copyright © IACUDIT ISSN (Online): 2241-9705 ISSN (Print): 2241-973X The World of Natural and Cultural Heritage of Republic of Srpska 1* Lorana Malović 1 Tourist organization Republic of Srpska Abstract Cultural tourism is important in order to preserve and appreciate the value of cultural heritage, familiarize people with it, as well as to establish and improve cooperation in the field of the protection and presentation of the cultural and natural beauty of an area. Heritage is an active memory, preservation of the process of “testimony” in a tangible and intangible aspect, that is, the process of remembering, as well as the possibility of reviving and repeating the cognitive processes, and cultural routes are a tool in the presentation of the heritage of various countries as part of the common European cultural heritage. Together, of course, they make a segment in the development of the tourism in the Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina. It is by means of the method of deduction, that is, the analysis and specialization of what is general and already understood to an understanding of particular and individual, that the places and motives, cultural and historical landscapes/attractions, which we want to preserve and present to the visitors in the best possible manner through organized thematic cultural routes, will be presented. One must fight for the authenticity of unquestionable values through a well-thought out and organized activity, and further on in this work the proposals, possibilities but also barriers will be presented with the aim of protecting and promoting the cultural and historical, as well as the natural heritage as touristic potential.
    [Show full text]
  • Sljubljivanje Sarajevskog Ćevapa I Hercegovačkih Vina/ ConAtion of Sarajevan Ćevap and Herzegovina Wines (Damir Fabijanić)…………………
    The Voyage of Discovery Putovanje otkrića Funded by the European Union 3 is publication represents a collection of articles (in full or an extract) published aer the visit of international travel writers to BiH in September 2012. Ova publikacija predstavlja zbirku tekstova (u cijelosti ili dijelova) koji su objavljeni nakon posjete medjunarodnih putopisaca BiH u septembru 2012. Many thanks to journalist who visited Bosnia and Herzegovina and contributed to this brochure: Hvala novinarima koji su posjetili Bosnu i Hercegovinu i učestvovali u stvaranju ove publikacije: Damjana Domanovac, “Putovanja za dvoje”, Croatia/Hrvatska Damir Fabijanić, “Iće&Piće”, Croatia/Hrvatska Hrvoje Dečak, Renato Branđolica, “Meridijani”, Croatia/Hrvatska Uwe Ebbinghaus, “Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung”, Germany/Njemačka Catherine Cleary, “e Irish Times”, Ireland/Irska Emilio Radice, “La Repubblica”, Italy/Italija Elena Racheva, “Voyage”, Russia/Rusija Marija Jakob, “Lisa”, Serbia/Srbija Žikica Milošević, “Travel Magazine”, Serbia/Srbija Srečko Klapš, “Horizont”, Slovenia/Slovenija Volkan Altintas, “Turizm Aktuel”, Turkey/Turska John Bell, “Guardian”, United Kingdom/Velika Britanija 4 SADRŽAJ/CONTENT: Živa bila, opet ovde My dear, here gain (Marija Jakob)………………………………………………………………............... 8 Trebinje: Duh starih vremena Trebinje: e Spirit of Old Times (Marija Jakob)…………………………………………................. 12 Zimske čarolije Winter Magic (Marija Jakob)…………………………………………………………………..........….… 13 Balkan Beauty Ljepota Balkana (Catherine Cleary)……………………………………………………………...........…
    [Show full text]
  • Salmonids of the Neretva River Basin - Present State and Suggested Sustainable Selection Programme to Protect and Strengthen Salmonid Populations
    Salmonids of the Neretva river basin - present state and suggested sustainable selection programme to protect and strengthen salmonid populations S. MUHAMEDAGIĆ1 , H. M. GJOEN2 & M. VEGRA3 1) Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciencies, University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina 2) Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences (IHA), Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Aas, Norway 3) Department of International Environment and Development Studies (Noragric), Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Aas, Norway Abstract The Neretva river is the largest tributary (225 km) entering the Adriatic Sea, and it covers 20% of the total water basin of Bosnia and Herzegovina.The Neretva river is home to several salmonids, and three of them are endemic: softmouth trout (Salmothymus obtusirostris oxyrhynchus), marble trout (Salmon Marmoratus) and dentex trout (Salmo dendex). Brown trout (Salmo trutta m.fario) is an autochthonous trout of the Neretva River. Fabricated constructions and activities in the river have partly destroyed the biotype of these salmonids. The unplanned restocking of the Neretva, by introducing autochthonous species (grayling, rainbow trout, brook trout) is an issue in this area. The main objective of the proposed protection plan, discussed in this study, is to plan and develop a sustainable breeding program to ensure the conservation of each of the autochthonous trout species in the Neretva and its tributaries. The rehabilitation of vital fish stocks will be supported by training people involved in fisheries, aquaculture and ecology. All these activities will be based at the restored Center for Fisheries “Neretva” – Konjic. Introduction Bosnia and Herzegovina and its water resources Bosnia and Herzegovina is the one of the youngest European countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Kelly 76Stjohnslrev257.Pdf (6.469Mb)
    +(,121/,1( Citation: 76 St. John's L. Rev. 257 2002 Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Thu Nov 12 08:49:34 2015 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: https://www.copyright.com/ccc/basicSearch.do? &operation=go&searchType=0 &lastSearch=simple&all=on&titleOrStdNo=0036-2905 ARTICLES CAN SOVEREIGNS BE BROUGHT TO JUSTICE? THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE'S EVOLUTION AND THE MEANING OF THE MILOSEVIC TRIAL MICHAEL J. KELLYt INTRODU CTION ............................................................................ 260 I. H ISTORICAL CONTEXT ............................................................ 260 II. CONCEPTUAL EVOLUTION OF GENOCIDE AS AN INTERNATIONALLY RECOGNIZED CRIME ........................... 264 A. GENOCIDE AND THE PERIOD OF WORLD WARS (1915- 1945) ....................................................................... 266 B. GENOCIDE CONVENTION DEFINES THE CRIME (1948) ....... 281 C. GENOCIDE AND INACTION DURING THE COLD WAR (1950- 1990) ....................................................................... 288 D. GENOCIDE AND REACTION AFTER THE COLD WAR (1990-2000) ....................................................................... 299 1. Political/Military Responses ........................................
    [Show full text]