DOCSLIB.ORG

Characterization and Ground-Water Flow Modeling of the Mint

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Characterization and Ground-Water Flow Modeling of the Mint CHARACTERIZATION AND GROUND-WATER FLOW MODELING OF THE MINT WASH / WILLIAMSON VALLEY AREA, YAVAPAI COUNTY By Luis Fernando Navarro A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Geology Northern Arizona University May 2002 Approved: Abraham E. Springer, Ph.D., Chair Paul J. Umhoefer, Ph.D. Charles M. Schlinger, Ph.D. ABSTRACT CHARACTERIZATION AND GROUND-WATER FLOW MODELING OF THE MINT WASH / WILLIAMSON VALLEY AREA, YAVAPAI COUNTY LUIS FERNANDO NAVARRO The characterization of the Mint Wash / Williamson Valley System (MWWVS) is a combination of geological and hydrogeological characterization of the Mint Wash / Williamson Valley area. The characterization was used to construct a ground-water flow model, used to research the water supply of the area. The geological characterization included data from previous investigations as well as data gathered through this study. The results include a geologic map, cross sections throughout the site, a synopsis of the known geological history of the area, including the identification of lithologies, and a description of the tectonic history of the area. The hydrogeological characterization included analyses of existing data, and collection and analyses of new data. A conceptual model was developed from preliminary analyses of data, then modified as more data was gathered. The characterization was used in the development of a three-dimensional finite- difference ground-water flow model. The model was calibrated to both the steady-state and transient conditions. The calibrated model was used to simulate MWWVS using several different water use scenarios and to compare these scenarios to the concept of sustainable ii yield. Sustainable yield was defined as yield that would not significantly affect the availability of ground water to riparian habitat and perennial springs. The results of the model indicates that the system currently does not exceed sustainable yield. Some of the water use scenarios that represent regulatory limits as well as potential future water use in the MWWVA did exceed the sustainable yield criteria. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Steven Maslansky of Maslansky GeoEnvironmental, Inc., E. Stanley Hobbs Jr., the Friday Luch Clubbe (FLC), the Salt River Project (SRP), the National Forest Service (NFS), Southwest Groundwater Consultants, Inc. specifically Bill Wellendorf, and the residents of the Mint Wash and Williamson Valley area for financial and logistical support for this thesis. Also, I would like to thank my advisor and committee members: Dr. Abraham Springer, Dr. Paul Umhoefer and Dr. Charlie Schlinger for their time, advice and input. Additionally, Beth Boyd from the Yavapai County Community College and Bev Eberson from the NFS provided advice and data. Thank you to J.J. Smith, Steve Andareise, and Doug Vandergon for their GIS support. This project would not have been possible without the help of several undergraduate and graduate students from Northern Arizona University who volunteered their time to assist during field trips. In particular, I would like to thank James “Jazzmaster Flex” Kessler who participated in most of the field trips. I would like to especially thank Steve M. and Abe who helped me develop this study, and believed in me as well as this project through challenging times including financial and physical hardships. I could not have completed this thesis without your support. Most of all, I would like to dedicate this thesis to my family, Angel, Eileen, Ana Elena, Juan Carlos, Diana Leonor, Jessica Ashley, Michele Cristina, and everyone else (you know who you are). You provided the heart and soul of this thesis. You are my inspiration, and there is no way I could have done this without you. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT.....................................................................................................................ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.............................................................................................iv LIST OF TABLES ..........................................................................................................ix LIST OF FIGURES .........................................................................................................xi LIST OF APPENDICES ................................................................................................xiv CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................1 Purpose and Objectives .......................................................................................1 Location ..............................................................................................................2 Significance of Problem .....................................................................................3 Previous Invesigations ........................................................................................5 CHAPTER 2: GEOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION...............................................8 Purpose and Objectives.......................................................................................8 Introduction.........................................................................................................9 Methods...............................................................................................................9 Geologic Map..........................................................................................9 Cross Sections........................................................................................10 Fracture Orientation..............................................................................11 Stream Bed Mapping..............................................................................12 Results................................................................................................................14 Geologic Map.........................................................................................14 v Cross Sections........................................................................................16 Fracture Orientation..............................................................................18 Stream Bed Mapping..............................................................................23 Conclusions........................................................................................................23. CHAPTER 3: HYDROGEOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION................................28 Purpose and Objectives.......................................................................................28 Introduction.........................................................................................................28 Background.........................................................................................................30 Methods...............................................................................................................31 Well Network Monitoring........................................................................31 Potentiometric Surface Map....................................................................32 Permeability.............................................................................................33 Aquifer Tests............................................................................................34. Water Budget...........................................................................................35 Results.................................................................................................................39. Hydrographs...........................................................................................39 Potentiometric Surface Map...................................................................40 Permeability............................................................................................41 Aquifer Tests...........................................................................................51 Water Budget..........................................................................................53 CHAPTER 4: GROUND-WATER FLOW MODELING..............................................56 vi Model Purpose....................................................................................................56 Model Objectives.................................................................................................57 Methods...............................................................................................................57 Conceptual Model...................................................................................57 Water Budget...........................................................................................59 Software Selection...................................................................................60 Spatial Descritization..............................................................................62 Boundaries...............................................................................................63 Parameter Values - Hydraulic Conductivity............................................65 Parameter Values - Recharge..................................................................66 Parameter Values - Storage/Specific Yield/Porosity...............................68 Parameter Values - Evapotranspiration..................................................68 Parameter Values - Drains.......................................................................69
Load more

Recommended publications
  • General Plan 2025 Chapter 1: Introduction
    Chapter 1 Introduction Every 10 to 20 years, towns, cities, and counties throughout Arizona and the What is a General Southwest revisit their general plans to ensure that an up-to-date connection exists Plan? between residents’ values, visions, and objectives; State law; and the physical development of their community. In 2011, the Town of Prescott Valley initiated an In simple terms, a general plan can be best described as a update process for its 2025 General Plan. The outcome of the 14-month update community's blueprint for future process is The Prescott Valley General Plan 2025 — A Community Blueprint for the development. It represents a Future. community's vision for the future; it is a constitution comprised of goals and policies used by a According to State law, towns, cities and counties are required to prepare and adopt a community's planning commission comprehensive, long-range general plan for the development of the community. In and town/city council to make land use and development-related Arizona, general plans consist of statements of community goals and development decisions. The general plan — policies, and include maps, any necessary diagrams and text setting forth objectives, and the goals, policies, and diagrams within — have a long- principles, development standards and plan proposals. term outlook, identifying the types of development patterns allowed Implementing General Plan 2025 is very important to present and future generations. and the spatial relationships of land uses. General plans (with In Prescott Valley, residents have a strong sense of civic pride, value the quality of life emphasis on the land use map) the Town offers, and desire to preserve the community’s positive characteristics into provide the foundation from which the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Prescott Valley Relocation Guide 2015-2016 1 Location & Climate
    www.azrelocationguides.com Top quality education is offered by many local area colleges and universities, along with the local school district. TABLE OF CONTENTS Location & Climate ...........................2 Housing & Shopping .........................3 Community Profile ........................ 4-6 Prescott Valley, Arizona Education ...................................... 7-9 Adult Living ......................................10 Healthcare ................................ 11-13 Recreation & Attractions .......... 14-16 ocated among the midst rolling hills and Day Trips .................................... 17-20 L grasslands between the Bradshaw and Cultural Arts ....................................21 Mingus Mountains, lies one of the newest and friendliest communities in Arizona. History ..............................................22 Situated about two hours by car north of Resources .................................. 23-27 Phoenix, Prescott Valley (incorporated in Places of Worship ......................23 1978) offers many opportunities for it's size Organizations & Clubs ..............23 in a generally mild four season climate. Coming Events ..........................24 The Town Center in citizen friendly Restaurants ................................25 Prescott Valley offers many amenities, such as the Harkins 14 Screen Luxury Cineplex, Important Numbers ............. 26-27 located within the Prescott Valley Entertainment Center. Numerous Advertisers Index ............................28 restaurants have joined the theater in making
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Chino Valley North 7½' Quadrangle, Yavapai County, Arizona
    DIGITAL GEOLOGIC MAP DGM-80 Arizona Geological Survey www.azgs.az.gov GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE CHINO VALLEY NORTH 7½’ QUADRANGLE, YAVAPAI COUNTY, ARIZONA, V. 1.0 Brian. F. Gootee, Charles A. Ferguson, Jon E. Spencer and Joseph P. Cook December 2010 ARIZONA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Geologic Map of the Chino Valley North 7½' Quadrangle, Yavapai County, Arizona by Brian F. Gootee, Charles A. Ferguson, Jon E. Spencer, and Joe P. Cook Arizona Geological Survey Digital Geologic Map DGM-80 version 1.0 December, 2010 Scale 1:24,000 (1 sheet, with text) Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress St., #100, Tucson, Arizona 85701 This geologic map was funded in part by the USGS National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program, award no. 08HQAG0093. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Government. Table of Contents Table of Contents......................................................................................................................... i List of Figures ............................................................................................................................. ii Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 Geologic Discussion ................................................................................................................... 3 Quaternary faulting ...........................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrology and Geomorphology of the Santa Maria and Big Sandy Rivers and Burro Creek, Western Arizona
    Hydrology and Geomorphology of the Santa Maria and Big Sandy Rivers and Burro Creek, Western Arizona By Jeanne E. Klawon Arizona Geological Survey Open-File Report 00-02 March, 2000 Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress, Suite #100, Tucson, Arizona 85701 46 p. text Investigations supported by the Arizona State Land Department As part of their efforts to gather technical information for stream navigability assessments Investigations done in cooperation with JE Fuller Hydrology / Geomorphology Hydrology and Geomorphology of the Santa Maria and Big Sandy Rivers and Burro Creek, Western Arizona by Jeanne E. Klawon Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report provides hydrologic and geomor- than 10 cfs. Flood events are dramatic in phologic information to aid in the evaluation of comparison. Historical peak flow estimates for the navigability of the Big Sandy River, Santa these rivers have been estimated at 68,700 Maria River, and Burro Creek. These streams cubic feet per second (cfs) (2/9/93) for the Big flow through rugged mountainous terrain of Sandy River, 47,400 cfs (2/14/80) for Burro Mohave, Yavapai, and La Paz counties in Creek, and 23,100 cfs (3/1/78) for the Santa western Arizona and join to form the Bill Maria River. The largest flow events have Williams River at what is now Alamo Dam occurred during the winter months when and Reservoir. The rivers reflect a diversity of meteorological conditions cause a series of channel patterns, and include the mainly wide storms to pass through the region, frequently and braided sandy alluvial channels of the Big generating multiple floods within a given year.
    [Show full text]
  • Prescott City Council Workshop Tuesday, July 27, 2010 Prescott, Arizona
    PRESCOTT CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP TUESDAY, JULY 27, 2010 PRESCOTT, ARIZONA MINUTES OF THE WORKSHOP OF THE PRESCOTT CITY COUNCIL held on TUESDAY, JULY 27, 2010 in the COUNCIL CHAMBERS located at CITY HALL, 201 SOUTH CORTEZ STREET, Prescott, Arizona. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Kuykendall called the workshop to order at 2:02 p.m. ROLL CALL: Present: Absent: Mayor Kuykendall None Councilman Blair Councilman Hanna Councilman Lamerson Councilwoman Linn Councilwoman Lopas Councilwoman Suttles 1. Presentation by Civiltec re Macro-Rainwater Harvesting/Evaporation Interception (M-RH/EI). Mr. McConnell introduced Rick Shroad President of Civiltec. Doug McMillan was also present. They began by presenting a PowerPoint presentation, attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference, which addressed the following items. Mr. Shroad said that the concept of M-RH/EI came to fruition a couple of years ago. They had been working on this for a few years to figure out the ups/downs, and goods and bads of it. They have presented it to a number of entities such as the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR), Salt River Project (SRP), environmental, political and service groups. They are going to have a two phase presentation – (1) background and (2) what they are doing with the background information. Mr. McMillan noted that there were real problems with the ground water. He showed hydrographs which were a groundwater table vs. time. The tables in the Prescott AMA were going down 2 ½ feet per year and some were over 10 feet per year. He then discussed various locations and noted that all were ADWR wells except one.
    [Show full text]
  • General Crook's Administration in Arizona, 1871-75
    General Crook's administration in Arizona, 1871-75 Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Bahm, Linda Weldy Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 29/09/2021 11:58:29 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/551868 GENERAL CROOK'S ADMINISTRATION IN ARIZONA, 1871-75 by Linda Weldy Bahm A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 19 6 6 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fu lfill ment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for per­ mission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED: APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below: J/{ <— /9 ^0 JOHN ALEXANDER CARROLL ^ T 5 ite Professor of History PREFACE In the four years following the bloody attack on an Indian encampment by a Tucson posse early in 1871, the veteran professional soldier George Crook had primary responsibility for the reduction and containment of the "hostile" Indians of the Territory of Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • Visit Cochise Country Where Even JOHNNY REB Got a Taste of Apache Vengeance
    Backpack a Dizzying Descent to the Colorado River arizonahighways.com SEPTEMBER 2004 Visit Cochise Country Where Even JOHNNY REB Got a Taste of Apache Vengeance Drop in on Kingman A Family Place view the Little Colorado River Primeval Splendor Boy-artist Phenom of the Navajos {also inside} SEPTEMBER 2004 46 DESTINATION S an Jose de Tumacacori Mission Some 300 years ago, the mission was a “community” amid turmoil and danger in a primitive land, now southern Arizona. 42 BACK ROAD ADVENTURE COVER/HISTORY PORTFOLIO 34 Northwest of Prescott, a winding route takes visitors to Ambushed by Apaches 20 A Cool, Moist Mountain Place remnants of classic ranch country around Camp Wood. In 1862, Confederate soldiers may have overreached A photographer finds primeval beauty and tranquility 48 HIKE OF THE MONTH for territory into Arizona, where some fell during a along the West Fork of the Little Colorado River. A pleasant journey in the Huachuca Mountains turns a surprise attack by Indians at Dragoon Springs. rattlesnake encounter into a happy-go-lucky memory. FOCUS ON NATURE 2 LETTERS & E-MAIL Rider Navajo Indian ADVENTURE 32 Grand Canyon Canyon Reservation 6 Tracking the Tiger Rattlesnake 3 TAKING THE National Park Rim-to-River Trek Reclusive most of the time, this Sonoran Desert OFF-RAMP Camp Two hardy Grand Canyon backpackers pick their way species gets all worked up and on the move when it’s KINGMAN 40 HUMOR Wood through rocky and difficult Rider Canyon to reach an time to find a mate. West Fork of the isolated, historic spot on the Colorado River.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Yavapai County Water Aware
    Water - Essential for all life This workbook is a regional resource designed to guide and assist citizens in their efforts to conserve water, with an emphasis on the reduction of outdoor water use. It could not have been written and produced without the dedication, professional advice and financial support provided by numerous individuals and groups. Special Thank You to the: Citizens of this region who continue to support the work of water conservation education and the responsible use of our limited resource. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation for the funding necessary to produce this workbook and continue our regional water conservation efforts. Prescott Active Management Agency (AMA) Upper Verde River Watershed Protection Coalition Includes the member communities: Yavapai County Water Advisory Committee Yavapai Prescott - Indian Tribe Town of Chino Valley Town of Prescott Valley Town of Dewey-Humboldt City of Prescott Principal Authors and Project Manager: Shaun Rydell, Water Conservation Coordinator- City of Prescott Amelia Ray – Masters Student – Prescott College Editor: Shaun Rydell 2009 Cover Photography by Kim Webb Legal Notice: Wide distribution of information included in this workbook is encouraged and permitted. This document is not intended to be a professional, legally binding instruction manual. The authors, editor, and municipal agents assume no responsibility for damages, financial or otherwise, which may result from use of the information and/or advice included in this publication. If all or part of the information included
    [Show full text]
  • PLACES of WORSHIP Bible Baptist Church Chino Valley Community Church Chino Valley Saving Grace Lutheran Church 3490 N
    1 PLACES OF WORSHIP Bible Baptist Church Chino Valley Community Church Chino Valley Saving Grace Lutheran Church 3490 N. Hwy 89, Chino Valley 1969 N State Route 89, (928) 636-1815 440 W. Palomino Rd., Chino 928-636-8465 Chino Valley First Southern Baptist Church Valley Calvary Chapel Chino Valley (928) 636-4184 1524 N State Route 89, (928) 636-9533 2235 S State Route 89, Ste B3, Chino Valley Family Church Chino Valley Shiloh Full Gospel Fellowship Chino Valley 718 S State Route 89, (928) 636-2014 175 E Quail Rd (928) 636-6291 Chino Valley Garchen Buddhist Institute Paulden, AZ 86334 Chino Paulden Ministerial Assn (928) 583-0825 9995 E Blissful Path, St Catherine LaBoure Catholic 735 E Road 1 S, Chino Valley Chino Valley Missionary Bap- (928) 925-1237 Church (928) 636-0276 tist Church Grace Baptist Church 2062 N State Route 89, Chino Chino Valley Bible Church 172 S Road 1 W, # 2806, 2010 S State Route 89, Valley 317 Market Place Drive, Chino Valley Chino Valley (928) 636-4071 Chino Valley (928) 636-6978 (928) 636-2949 St. Luke’s Episcopal Church (928) 636-4750 Chino Valley United Methodist Hope Evangelical Lutheran 2000 Shepherd’s LN, Prescott, Chino Valley Bible Sabbath 735 E Road 1 S, Chino Valley 1010 N Rd 1 E, Chino Valley AZ 86301 Church (928) 636-2969 (928) 636-2796 928-778-4499 194 S Road 1 W, Chino Valley Church of Christ www.hopechinovalley.com Word of Life Assembly Church (928) 636-5945 1260 S State Route 89, Jehovah’s Witnesses 590 N Road 1 W, Chino Valley Chino Valley Church of the Chino Valley 3220 N State Route 89, (928) 636-4224 Nazarene (928) 830-3600 Chino Valley 2945 N.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior U.S
    United States Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103 Phoenix, Arizona 85021-4951 Telephone: (602) 242-0210 FAX: (602) 242-2513 In Reply Refer To: AESO/SE 2-21-01-F-241 December 14, 2001 Memorandum To: Field Manager, Kingman Field Office, Bureau of Land Management, Kingman, Arizona From: Field Supervisor Subject: Biological Opinion for the proposed prescribed burn program within the Kingman Field Office boundaries - Pine Lake Wildland/Urban Interface This document transmits the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (Service) biological opinion based on our review of the proposed implementation of a prescribed fire program within land administered by the Kingman Field Office of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), located in Mohave and east Yavapai counties, Arizona, and its effects on the Hualapai Mexican vole (Microtus mexicanus hualpaiensis) in accordance with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (Act), as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Your March 14, 2001, request for formal consultation was received on March 16, 2001. This biological opinion is based on information provided in the biological evaluation attached to the March 14, 2001, request for consultation; additional information provided by the BLM via electronic mail; the April 18, 2001, field investigation; telephone conversations; and other sources of information. A complete administrative record of this consultation is on file at this office. Consultation History The Service received BLM’s March 14, 2001, request for formal consultation on March 16, 2001. The request included the “Biological Evaluation: Programmatic Environmental Assessment for Prescribed Fire” (BE).
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Golden Eagle Productivity Assessment and Nest Survey 2015
    ARIZONA GOLDEN EAGLE PRODUCTIVITY ASSESSMENT AND NEST SURVEY 2015 Kyle M. McCarty, Eagle Field Projects Coordinator Kurt L. Licence, Birds and Mammals Technician Kenneth V. Jacobson, Raptor Management Coordinator Nongame Wildlife Branch, Wildlife Management Division Photo by Kurt Licence Technical Report 300 Nongame and Endangered Wildlife Program Arizona Game and Fish Department 5000 West Carefree Highway Phoenix, Arizona 85086 December 2015 CIVIL RIGHTS AND DIVERSITY COMPLIANCE The Arizona Game and Fish Commission receives federal financial assistance in Sport Fish and Wildlife Restoration. Under Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, or disability. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information please write to: Arizona Game and Fish Department Office of the Deputy Director, DOHQ 5000 W. Carefree Highway Phoenix, Arizona 85086 and U.S. Department of the Interior Office for Equal Opportunity 1849 C Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20240 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT COMPLIANCE The Arizona Game and Fish Department complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. This document is available in alternative format by contacting the Arizona Game and Fish Department, Office of the Deputy Director at the address listed above, call (602) 789-3326, or TTY 1-800-367-8939.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona (Arizona Did Not Achieve Statehood Until 1912 So All Pre-WWI Locations Should Be Considered As Arizona Territory)
    Medal of Honor Recipients Who Were Born In Arizona (Arizona did not achieve statehood until 1912 so all pre-WWI locations should be considered as Arizona Territory) Alchesay, William Arizona Indian Campaigns Blanquet, Arizona Indian Campaigns Chiquito, Arizona Indian Campaigns Dunagan, Kern Wayne Superior, AZ Vietnam War Elsatsoosh, Arizona Indian Campaigns Jim, Arizona Indian Campaigns Kelsay, Arizona Indian Campaigns Kosoha, Arizona Indian Campaigns Luke, Jr, Frank Phoenix, AZ World War I Machol, Arizona Indian Campaigns Mendoza, Manuel Verdugo Miami, AZ World War II Nannasaddie, Arizona Indian Campaigns Nantaje, Arizona Indian Campaigns Rowdy, Y.B. Arizona Indian Campaigns Smith, Cornelius Cole Tucson, AZ Indian Campaigns Vargas, Jr., Jay R. Winslow, AZ Vietnam War Compiled by Gayle Alvarez, Medal of Honor Historical Society, US As of 7 June 2019 Page 1 Medal of Honor Recipients Who Entered The Service In Arizona Alchesay, William Camp Verde, AZ Indian Campaigns Austin, Oscar Palmer Phoenix, AZ Vietnam War Bacon, Nicky Daniel Phoenix, AZ Vietnam War Blanquet possibly Camp Grant, AZ Indian Campaigns (An 1873 enlistment for Ba-ela-ye, an alternate spelling recorded in US Army Gallantry and Meritorious Conduct 1866-1891, was at Camp Grant.) Bonnyman, Jr., Alexander "Sandy" New Mexico/Phoenix, AZ World War II (Bonnyman is often listed as accredited to New Mexico but his USMC biography states he enlisted in Phoenix, AZ. The USMC muster rolls agree) Chiquito, San Carlos, AZ Indian Campaigns Elsatsoosh possibly Camp Grant, AZ Indian Campaigns
    [Show full text]