DOCSLIB.ORG

WCCER) BIOLOGICAL INVENTORY Preface

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
WCCER) BIOLOGICAL INVENTORY Preface WALNUT CREEK CENTER FOR EDUCATION AND RESEARCH ( WCCER) BIOLOGICAL INVENTORY Preface The Walnut Creek Center for Education and Research (WCCER) is located within the western portion of the Prescott National Forest, Chino Ranger District. Emplaced 40 miles northwest of Prescott in Yavapai County, this sector of the District includes the Santa Maria and Juniper Mountains, adjacent valleys and foothills, and Chino Valley to the east. No major highways or large population centers occur in the area at this time. Regional topography is commonly extreme and ranges from 4,070 feet at the bottom of Smith Canyon to 7,270 feet at Hyde Mountain. WCCER is located within the lower floodplain of Walnut Creek that is a major headwater of the Verde River. Both Walnut Creek (Juniper Mountains drainage) and Apache Creek (Santa Maria Mountains drainage) converge on the site. Stream flows are mostly perennial (intermittent during extended droughts) with greatest surface flows usually occurring during the winter-spring months and summer monsoons. Zones of Riparian Deciduous Forest, Grassland, Interior Chaparral, and Juniper- Pinyon communities occur within the Center. A well developed Cottonwood-Willow gallery forest and Scrub Willow community occurs adjacent to the active channel. Patches of Arizona Walnut with an understory of diverse grasses stretch across the more level floodplain proper. The unique riparian forest appears to be a relict community, particularly the Walnut association, and reflects a contraction of a more widespread distribution during the past. Extensive second growth Junipers and Pinyons cover the northern foothills and mosaics of Interior Chaparral-Juniper-Pinyon occupy the more rugged rocky southern hills. Due to the diversity of available habitats, food resources, and moisture, the WCCER site promotes a diversity of resident, seasonal, and visiting wildlife species. Many obligate and facultative vertebrate and invertebrate species benefit directly or indirectly on riparian microclimates and macroclimates for food, cover, and reproduction. The Center is chartered and managed by the Walnut Creek Education and Research Partnership, This unique union of educational and research institutions is comprised of Yavapai College, Prescott College, Northern Arizona University, and Sharlot Hall Museum. The site is leased from the Prescott National Forest, Chino District, under a special use permit. Presently, the infrastructure consists of three main buildings and four outbuildings: a house, a barn, and a pump-house. The house and barn, with attached corral, are listed on the National Historic Register. A water storage tank north of the house provides adequate water. The existing septic system can accommodate 40 people. Six sites with electrical, water, and septic hook-ups are also available for future use. The Partnership intends to employ WCCER as a natural rural base to offer hands-on educational experiences to a variety of students and the public in areas such as riparian ecology, field biology, geology, and cultural history. The site also offers limitless research opportunities. In addition, the Partnership seeks to develop a working relationship with neighbors and land managers (three ranching families and the Forest Service). The purpose of this study was to carry out a two-year ecological study of the 280- acre Walnut Creek Center site. The study was designed to collect baseline information and to assist in the establishment and management of the site. Briefly, physical components of stream geomorphology, topography, and soils were investigated, plant collections were accomplished, and ecological studies of vegetation, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals were performed. Acknowledgements Special recognition is due to the wealth of individuals who participated in this collaborative effort, many of which, labored long hours in the field and often in adverse weather conditions. - Principal investigator: Ken Abbott (fauna, manuscript, and liaison) - Co-principal investigator: Eric Glomski (flora and geomorphology) - Flora and geomorphology : Paul Sneed, Michael Byrd, Jeff Hogue, Romie Haberle, Marc Baker - Fauna: Bonnie Pranter, Johnava Duryea, Rebecca Davis, Matt Spille, Al Frank, Neil Cobb, Dan Carroll, Marchele Dickey, Gene Drollinger, Chris Davis, Nathan Zorich, Lisa Gelcziz, Kaibab Gelcziz, Tyler Williams, Josh Keith, Sparky Keith, Carolyn Petty -Yavapai College: Doreen Daily, Neil Goodell, Jeff Rose and staff, Brent-Boone Roberts Don Yeager, Caye Patton, Ruth Lilly, Carol Clayton - Arizona Game and Fish: Mike Robbie, Mike Shredl, Tim Snow, Bill vanPelt - Chino Ranger District: Mark Johnson, Pete James, Sue Schuhardt, Cara Staab, Elaine Zamora - Arizona Water Protection Fund Commission: Ruth Valencia, Rodney Held This research was supported by agreements between the Department of Biology, Yavapai College, and the Arizona Water Protection Fund Commission (No. 97-030WPF), Additional support was provided by the Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Control and Prevention, 'Longitudinal Studies of Rodent Reservoirs of Hantavirus in the Southwestern United States' (U50/CCU913429-02). CONTENTS Preface i Contents Hi Tables iv Figures v Photo Points vii Geomorphology Contents - Geomorphology 1 Geomorphology 2 Plant Survey and Collection Contents - Plant Survey and Collection 19 Plant Survey and Collection 20 Vegetation Mapping Contents - Vegetation Mapping 36 Vegetation Mapping 37 Volumetric (Structural) Vegetation Survey Contents - Volumetric Vegetation Survey 43 Volumetric (Structural) Vegetation Survey 44 Reptile and Amphibian Survey Contents - Reptile and Amphibian Survey 81 Reptile and Amphibian Survey 82 Bird Survey Contents - Bird Survey , 89 Bird Survey 90 Bat Survey Contents - Bat Survey 121 Bat Survey 122 Large Mammal Survey Contents - Large Mammal Survey 127 Large Mammal Survey 128 Small Mammal Survey Contents - Small Mammal Survey 133 Small Mammal Survey 134 References 153 Photo Appendices Contents - Photo Appendices 156 Photo Appendices 157 175 in TABLES Geomorphol ogy Table 1 GPS data for geomorph cross sections-Valley 10 Table 2 Pebble count data 10 Table 3 Geomorphology photo log 11 Plant Survey and Collection Table 1 Walnut Creek plant list 1998-1999 (by genera) 22 Table2 Walnut Creek plant list 1998-1999 (by family) 29 Volumetric (Structural) Vegetation Survey Table 1 GPS data for FHD transects (Walnut Creek) 49 Table 2 Foliar height distribution-photo log 50 Reptile and Amphibian Survey Table 1 Reptile & amphibian species list and relative abundance for Walnut Creek Education and Research Station 84 Bird Survey Table 1. Avian species list for Walnut Creek (22 months), 01/98 - 10/99 109 Table 2 Habitat, food, and seasonal preferences of obligate riparian and facultative avian species Ill Table 3 Avian neotropical migrant species and monthly occurrence, Walnut Creek, 05/98-10/99 113 Table 4 Avian species seasonal and monthly occurrence, 18 months, Walnut Creek, 05/98-10/99 114 Table 5 Number of total and seasonal avian species observed during survey periods and percent total.. 117 Table 6 Seasonal and spatial data, Walnut Creek, 05/98-10/99 118 Table 7 Avian species observed exclusively on Grid A or Grid B, Walnut Creek, 05/98-10/99 119 Table 8 Total number of birds identified as fly-overs, audibles, and visuals, Walnut Creek 120 Table 9 Riparian, floodplain, and grid analysis summary, Walnut Creek, 18 months 108 Bat Survey Table 1 Bat species list and monthly occurrence for Walnut Creek 124 Table 2 Ecological traits of bat species observed at Walnut Creek 124 Large Mammal Survey Table 1 Mammal species list and relative abundance for Walnut Creek 131 Small Mammal Survey Table 1. Walnut Creek: Number of Samples, Individuals, Virus Prevalence, and Captures 140 Table 2. Species composition as percent total/month for total trapping period, low and high density .... 142 Table 3. Population densities, infection, and antibody prevalence in P. boy lit at two webs 142 Table 4 Antibody persistence and seroconversions in P. boylii 150 Table 5 Walnut Creek: Monthly serological data and infection indices 151 IV FIGURES Geomorphology Fig, 1 Map of geomorphic cross sections 5 Fig, 2 Geomorphic cross sectins - valley wide 6 Fig. 3 Geomorphic cross sectins - bankful & floodprone 7 Fig, 4 Channel materials for cross sections 8 Fig. 5 Profile graphs 9 Vegetation Mapping Fig. 1 Map of WCCER vegetation associations. 41 Fig. 2 Map of mixed deciduous broadleaf association 42 Volumetric (Structural) Vegetation Survey Fig. 1 Map of foliar height density transect locations 48 Reptile and Amphibian Survey Fig. 1 Locations of pit-fall arrays and reptile boards, Avian A-Grid: Walnut Creek 83 Fig. 2 Locations of pit-fall arrays and reptile boards, Avian B-Grid; Walnut Creek 84 Fig. 3 Distributions of the Lowland leopard frog and Arizona toad, Walnut Creek: 1998-1999 86 Fig. 4 Distributions of selected lizards and rattlesnakes, Walnut Creek: 1998-1999 87 Bird Survey Fig. 1 B-Grid: general locations of Walnut and Apache Creeks, riparian and floodplain stations,..cont-., 92 Fig. 2 A-Grid: general locations of Walnut and Apache Creeks, riparian and floodplain stations,..cont-. 93 Fig. 3 Number of species associated with major habitats-Walnut Creek 95 Fig. 4 Species habitat types and percent food preferences-Walnut Creek 95 Fig. 5 Avian occupancy trends - Walnut Creek ( 131 species) 96 Fig. 6 Number of avian species and seasonal occurence- Walnut Creek (18 months) 97 Fig. 7 Monthly percent totals of seasonal species- Walnut Creek
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Collection of Oak Trees of Mexico and Central America in Iturraran Botanical Gardens
    The Collection of Oak Trees of Mexico and Central America in Iturraran Botanical Gardens Francisco Garin Garcia Iturraran Botanical Gardens, northern Spain [email protected] Overview Iturraran Botanical Gardens occupy 25 hectares of the northern area of Spain’s Pagoeta Natural Park. They extend along the slopes of the Iturraran hill upon the former hay meadows belonging to the farmhouse of the same name, currently the Reception Centre of the Park. The minimum altitude is 130 m above sea level, and the maximum is 220 m. Within its bounds there are indigenous wooded copses of Quercus robur and other non-coniferous species. Annual precipitation ranges from 140 to 160 cm/year. The maximum temperatures can reach 30º C on some days of summer and even during periods of southern winds on isolated days from October to March; the winter minimums fall to -3º C or -5 º C, occasionally registering as low as -7º C. Frosty days are few and they do not last long. It may snow several days each year. Soils are fairly shallow, with a calcareous substratum, but acidified by the abundant rainfall. In general, the pH is neutral due to their action. Collections The first plantations date back to late 1987. There are currently approximately 5,000 different taxa, the majority being trees and shrubs. There are around 3,000 species, including around 300 species from the genus Quercus; 100 of them are from Mexico and Central America. Quercus costaricensis photo©Francisco Garcia 48 International Oak Journal No. 22 Spring 2011 Oaks from Mexico and Oaks from Mexico
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Coronado Revised Plan
    Coronado National United States Forest Department of Agriculture Forest Draft Land and Service Resource Management August 2011 Plan The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Printed on recycled paper – Month and Year Draft Land and Resource Management Plan Coronado National Forest Cochise, Graham, Pima, Pinal, and Santa Cruz Counties, Arizona Hidalgo County, New Mexico Responsible Official: Regional Forester Southwestern Region 333 Broadway Boulevard SE Albuquerque, NM 87102 (505) 842-3292 For more information contact: Forest Planner Coronado National Forest 300 West Congress, FB 42 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 388-8300 TTY 711 [email protected] ii Draft Land and Management Resource Plan Coronado National Forest Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction ...................................................................................... 1 Purpose of Land and Resource Management Plan ......................................... 1 Overview of the Coronado National Forest .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Chiricahua National Monument
    In Cooperation with the University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Chiricahua National Monument Open-File Report 2008-1023 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey National Park Service This page left intentionally blank. In cooperation with the University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Chiricahua National Monument By Brian F. Powell, Cecilia A. Schmidt, William L. Halvorson, and Pamela Anning Open-File Report 2008-1023 U.S. Geological Survey Southwest Biological Science Center Sonoran Desert Research Station University of Arizona U.S. Department of the Interior School of Natural Resources U.S. Geological Survey 125 Biological Sciences East National Park Service Tucson, Arizona 85721 U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2008 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS-the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web:http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested Citation Powell, B.F., Schmidt, C.A., Halvorson, W.L., and Anning, Pamela, 2008, Vascular plant and vertebrate inventory of Chiricahua National Monument: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008-1023, 104 p. [http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2008/1023/]. Cover photo: Chiricahua National Monument. Photograph by National Park Service. Note: This report supersedes Schmidt et al. (2005). Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Arizona History Index, M
    Index to the Journal of Arizona History, M Arizona Historical Society, [email protected] 480-387-5355 NOTE: the index includes two citation formats. The format for Volumes 1-5 is: volume (issue): page number(s) The format for Volumes 6 -54 is: volume: page number(s) M McAdams, Cliff, book by, reviewed 26:242 McAdoo, Ellen W. 43:225 McAdoo, W. C. 18:194 McAdoo, William 36:52; 39:225; 43:225 McAhren, Ben 19:353 McAlister, M. J. 26:430 McAllester, David E., book coedited by, reviewed 20:144-46 McAllester, David P., book coedited by, reviewed 45:120 McAllister, James P. 49:4-6 McAllister, R. Burnell 43:51 McAllister, R. S. 43:47 McAllister, S. W. 8:171 n. 2 McAlpine, Tom 10:190 McAndrew, John “Boots”, photo of 36:288 McAnich, Fred, book reviewed by 49:74-75 books reviewed by 43:95-97 1 Index to the Journal of Arizona History, M Arizona Historical Society, [email protected] 480-387-5355 McArtan, Neill, develops Pastime Park 31:20-22 death of 31:36-37 photo of 31:21 McArthur, Arthur 10:20 McArthur, Charles H. 21:171-72, 178; 33:277 photos 21:177, 180 McArthur, Douglas 38:278 McArthur, Lorraine (daughter), photo of 34:428 McArthur, Lorraine (mother), photo of 34:428 McArthur, Louise, photo of 34:428 McArthur, Perry 43:349 McArthur, Warren, photo of 34:428 McArthur, Warren, Jr. 33:276 article by and about 21:171-88 photos 21:174-75, 177, 180, 187 McAuley, (Mother Superior) Mary Catherine 39:264, 265, 285 McAuley, Skeet, book by, reviewed 31:438 McAuliffe, Helen W.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning and Zoning
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Summary............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Overview ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Definitions Used in This Plan ....................................................................................... 1 1.3 How to Use the Plan .................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Land Use ...................................................................................................................... 2 1.5 Circulation .................................................................................................................... 3 1.6 Applicability .................................................................................................................. 3 1.7 Previous Comprehensive Plans ................................................................................... 3 1.8 Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan ................................................................... 3 2.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Role and Purpose of the Comprehensive Plan ............................................................ 5 2.2 Land Use Element........................................................................................................ 5 2.3
    [Show full text]
  • Oaks of the Wild West Inventory Page 1 Nursery Stock Feb, 2016
    Oaks of the Wild West Inventory Nursery Stock Legend: AZ = Arizona Nursery TX = Texas Nursery Feb, 2016 *Some species are also available in tube sizes Pine Trees Scientific Name 1G 3/5G 10G 15 G Aleppo Pine Pinus halapensis AZ Afghan Pine Pinus elderica AZ Apache Pine Pinus engelmannii AZ Chinese Pine Pinus tabulaeformis AZ Chihuahua Pine Pinus leiophylla Cluster Pine Pinus pinaster AZ Elderica Pine Pinus elderica AZ AZ Italian Stone Pine Pinus pinea AZ Japanese Black Pine Pinus thunbergii Long Leaf Pine Pinus palustris Mexican Pinyon Pine Pinus cembroides AZ Colorado Pinyon Pine Pinus Edulis AZ Ponderosa Pine Pinus ponderosa AZ Scotch Pine Pinus sylvestre AZ Single Leaf Pine Pinus monophylla AZ Texas Pine Pinus remota AZ, TX Common Trees Scientific Name 1G 3/5G 10G 15 G Arizona Sycamore Platanus wrightii ** Ash, Arizona Fraxinus velutina AZ AZ Black Walnut, Arizona Juglans major AZ AZ Black Walnut, Texas Juglans microcarpa TX Black Walnut juglans nigra AZ, TX Big Tooth Maple Acer grandidentatum AZ Carolina Buckthorn Rhamnus caroliniana TX Chitalpa Chitalpa tashkentensis AZ Crabapple, Blanco Malus ioensis var. texana Cypress, Bald Taxodium distichum AZ Desert Willow Chillopsis linearis AZ AZ Elm, Cedar Ulmus crassifolia TX TX Ginko Ginkgo biloba TX Hackberry, Canyon Celtis reticulata AZ AZ AZ Hackberry, Common Celtis occidentalis TX Maple (Sugar) Acer saccharum AZ AZ Mexican Maple Acer skutchii AZ Mexican Sycamore Platanus mexicana ** Mimosa, fragrant Mimosa borealis Page 1 Oaks of the Wild West Inventory Pistache (Red Push) Pistacia
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrology and Geomorphology of the Santa Maria and Big Sandy Rivers and Burro Creek, Western Arizona
    Hydrology and Geomorphology of the Santa Maria and Big Sandy Rivers and Burro Creek, Western Arizona By Jeanne E. Klawon Arizona Geological Survey Open-File Report 00-02 March, 2000 Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress, Suite #100, Tucson, Arizona 85701 46 p. text Investigations supported by the Arizona State Land Department As part of their efforts to gather technical information for stream navigability assessments Investigations done in cooperation with JE Fuller Hydrology / Geomorphology Hydrology and Geomorphology of the Santa Maria and Big Sandy Rivers and Burro Creek, Western Arizona by Jeanne E. Klawon Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report provides hydrologic and geomor- than 10 cfs. Flood events are dramatic in phologic information to aid in the evaluation of comparison. Historical peak flow estimates for the navigability of the Big Sandy River, Santa these rivers have been estimated at 68,700 Maria River, and Burro Creek. These streams cubic feet per second (cfs) (2/9/93) for the Big flow through rugged mountainous terrain of Sandy River, 47,400 cfs (2/14/80) for Burro Mohave, Yavapai, and La Paz counties in Creek, and 23,100 cfs (3/1/78) for the Santa western Arizona and join to form the Bill Maria River. The largest flow events have Williams River at what is now Alamo Dam occurred during the winter months when and Reservoir. The rivers reflect a diversity of meteorological conditions cause a series of channel patterns, and include the mainly wide storms to pass through the region, frequently and braided sandy alluvial channels of the Big generating multiple floods within a given year.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Stand-Replacing Fire in Upper Montane Forests of the Madrean Sky Islands and Mogollon Plateau, Southwestern USA
    Fire Ecology Volume 7, Issue 3, 2011 Margolis et al.: Historical Stand-Replacing Fire doi: 10.4996/fireecology.0703088 Page 88 RESEARCH ARTICLE HISTORICAL STAND-REPLACING FIRE IN UPPER MONTANE FORESTS OF THE MADREAN SKY ISLANDS AND MOGOLLON PLATEAU, SOUTHWESTERN USA Ellis Q. Margolis1*, Thomas W. Swetnam1, and Craig D. Allen2 1University of Arizona Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, 105 W. Stadium, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA 2US Geological Survey Jemez Mountains Field Station, HCR 1, Box 1, Number 15, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87544, USA *Corresponding author: Tel.: 001-520-626-2733; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The recent occurrence of large fires with a substantial stand-replacing component in the southwestern United States (e.g., Cerro Grande, 2000; Rodeo-Chedeski, 2002; Aspen, 2003; Horseshoe 2, Las Conchas, and Wallow, 2011) has raised questions about the his- torical role of stand-replacing fire in the region. We reconstructed fire dates and stand-re- placing fire patch sizes using four lines of tree-ring evidence at four upper montane forest sites (>2600 m) in the Madrean Sky Islands and Mogollon Plateau of Arizona and New Mexico, USA. The four lines of tree-ring evidence include: (1) quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) and spruce-fir age structure, (2) conifer death dates, (3) traumatic resin ducts and ring-width changes, and (4) conifer fire scars. Pre-1905 fire regimes in the upper montane forest sites were variable, with drier, south-facing portions of some sites record- ing frequent, low-severity fire (mean fire interval of all fires ranging from 5 yr to 11 yr among sites), others burning with stand-replacing severity, and others with no evidence of fire for >300 yr.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Drought Preparedness Plan
    Arizona Drought Preparedness Plan OOPPEERRAATTIIOONNAALL DDRROOUUGGHHTT PPLLAANN Governor’s Drought Task Force Governor Janet Napolitano October 8, 2004 GOVERNOR’S DROUGHT TASK FORCE ARIZONA DROUGHT PREPAREDNESS PLAN Operational Drought Plan - 10-08-2004 GOVERNOR’S DROUGHT TASK FORCE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Governor’s Drought Task Force would like to thank Herb Guenther, Director of the Arizona Department of Water Resources and his staff for their support and assistance in the development of this Plan. Additionally, the Task Force would like to recognize the following individuals and organizations for their assistance and contributions: Mike Austin, Arizona Department of Water Resources Staff to the Task Force Sandy Whitney, Arizona Water Banking Authority (Coordinator) Carol Young, Arizona Department of Water Resources (Administrative Assistant) Workgroup/Committee Co-Chairs Commerce, Recreation & Tourism Jim Holt, Arizona Department of Water Resources Conservation Committee Marjie Risk, Arizona Department of Water Resources (Coordinator) Environmental Health, Watershed Management, Livestock & Wildlife Steve Barker, Natural Resources Conservation Service (Co-Chair) George Ruyle, University of Arizona (Co-Chair) Sandy Whitney (Co-Chair) Irrigated Agriculture Mike Hanrahan, Arizona Department of Water Resources (Co-Chair) Sheldon Jones, Agri-Business Council (Co-Chair) Monitoring Committee Gregg Garfin, University of Arizona – CLIMAS (Co-Chair) Tony Haffer, National Weather Service – Phoenix (Co-Chair) Municipal & Industrial Workgroup Tom
    [Show full text]
  • The Avifauna of Apache County, Arizona
    THE AVIFAUNA OF APACHE COUNTY, ARIZONA GARY H. ROSENBERG. Museum of Natural Science, Louisiana State University. Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803 SCOTT B. TERRILL, Departmentof BiologicalSciences, State Universityof New York at Albany, 1400 WashingtonAve., Albany, New York 12222 In general, the distributionand the seasonalstatus of the avifauna of Arizonaare fairly well understood.The Birdsof Arizona (Phillipset al. 1964) encompassesthe entirestate and is fairlycomplete for all seasons.Large sec- tions of the state, however, have received relatively little ornithological coverage. The entire region of Apache County in northeasternArizona is one such area. Even though this area is quite interestingornithologically, before 1976 it receivedlittle coveragerelative to the many popularbirding "hot spots"in other sectionsof the state. It is possibleto assemblea list of those speciesthat breed in Apache County usingPhillips et al. (1964), its revisionby Monson and Phillips(1981), and severaldetailed studies (e.g. Carotherset al. 1973, Franzreb1975). Yet there remain substantialgaps in our knowledgeof migrant, wintering,and some nestingspecies found in Apache County. Since the mid-1970s, primarilyas a resultof the "vagranthunting" boom that swept parts of the West, Apache County has been visitedrepeatedly during all seasons.A significantincrease in knowledge of the statusand distributionof birds in northeasternArizona has resulted. This paper em- phasizesthe diversityand ornithologicaluniqueness of Apache County and summarizes the status of the birds found there. Apache County coversan area of approximately15,000 km2 in the north- eastern corner of Arizona. It extends from the White Mountains in the south to the Utah border in the north. The entire eastern border is shared with New Mexico and the county extendsabout 85 km to its westernborder shared with Navajo County.
    [Show full text]
  • Floristic Surveys of Saguaro National Park Protected Natural Areas
    Floristic Surveys of Saguaro National Park Protected Natural Areas William L. Halvorson and Brooke S. Gebow, editors Technical Report No. 68 United States Geological Survey Sonoran Desert Field Station The University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona USGS Sonoran Desert Field Station The University of Arizona, Tucson The Sonoran Desert Field Station (SDFS) at The University of Arizona is a unit of the USGS Western Ecological Research Center (WERC). It was originally established as a National Park Service Cooperative Park Studies Unit (CPSU) in 1973 with a research staff and ties to The University of Arizona. Transferred to the USGS Biological Resources Division in 1996, the SDFS continues the CPSU mission of providing scientific data (1) to assist U.S. Department of Interior land management agencies within Arizona and (2) to foster cooperation among all parties overseeing sensitive natural and cultural resources in the region. It also is charged with making its data resources and researchers available to the interested public. Seventeen such field stations in California, Arizona, and Nevada carry out WERC’s work. The SDFS provides a multi-disciplinary approach to studies in natural and cultural sciences. Principal cooperators include the School of Renewable Natural Resources and the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at The University of Arizona. Unit scientists also hold faculty or research associate appointments at the university. The Technical Report series distributes information relevant to high priority regional resource management needs. The series presents detailed accounts of study design, methods, results, and applications possibly not accommodated in the formal scientific literature. Technical Reports follow SDFS guidelines and are subject to peer review and editing.
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of Adult Female Black Bear Daybeds
    CHARACTERISTICSOF ADULTFEMALE BLACK BEAR DAYBEDSIN NORTHERNARIZONA CHERYLM. MOLLOHAN,Arizona Game and Fish Department, 2222 Greenway Road, Phoenix, AZ 85023 Abstract: Ninety-four black bear (Ursus americanus) bedding sites were located between May 1982 and August 1984. Locations were identified by radio- tracking 14 adult females. Sampling from sites of females with and without cubs showed both bedding and feeding activity at 39% of the sites. Multiple daybeds were found at 28% of the sites and all sites were within 0.8 km of water. Bedding sites occurred on canyon walls 81% of the time, the slopes of which averaged 39%. Daybeds were on the uphill side of a tree 74% of the time. Bed trees averaged 73 cm dbh. Chewing and scratching of daybed trees was recorded at 38% of the sites, and scats were found at 69% of the sites. Removal of vegetative cover and large trees in black bear bedding habitat could reduce overall habitat quality. Int. Conf. Bear Res. and Manage. 7:145-149 Black bear activity patterns and habitat use have Basin Conifer Woodland (Brown et al. 1979). Ridg- been documented in the western United States (Am- etops below 2,100 m are predominately pinyon pine strup and Beecham 1976, Lindzey and Meslow 1977, (Pinus edulis) and alligator juniper (Juniperus dep- LeCount et al. 1984, Unsworth 1984, Young 1984, peana); ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) is on the Mollohan 1985). Young (1984) and Unsworth (1984) west-facing slopes of major canyons and mixed con- briefly discussed black bear bedding sites but gave ifer on the east-facing slopes.
    [Show full text]