<<

Summary of Earthquake Activity in for 1989

NORTHERN ARIZONA ~ 2.0. The rest of1989 at theSouthRim was quiet, except for three earthquakes of M by David S. Brumbaugh, Director 2.9,2.8, and 2.2 inSeptember, one of ML3.& by Terry C. Wallace Arizona Earthquake Information Center in November, and one ofML2.9 in Decem­ Department of Geosciences ber (Table 1). University of Arizona The year 1989 was marked by a sharp Activity onthe MogollonPlateau south­ increase in earthquake activity. This capped east of Flagstaff was initiated by an ML3.4 The University of Arizona operates a a trend during the last half of the decade earthquake at Chavez Mountain on April World Wide Standardized Seismic Network towards larger and more frequent events 18. Events continued through September (WWSSN) station, TUC, in the Catalina (Figure 1). The number of earthquakes of 1989, at times in swarms. Two other earth­ Mountains. The station's instrumentation local magnitude equal to or exceeding 2.0 quakes of ML~ 3.0 occurred onJuly 17 and consists of six seismographs: three short­ (ML~ 2.0) increased nearly200 percent over September 6. The latter shock was part ofa period components and three long-period that in 1988. Nearly all ofthe events were cluster of five events that day near Sunset components. The former are run at high concentrated in three areas in the northern Mountain. magnification (100,000 X) and are extremely part of the State: the , the Other than the ML4.0 events at the can­ effective for monitoring seismic activity Mogollon Plateau, and the yon, the largest earthquakes in northern within 500 kilometers of Tucson. In coop­ (Figure 2). Arizona in 1989 occurred in the Arizona eration with the Arizona Sonora Desert The most active ofthese three areas was Strip northwest of the Grand Canyon. These Museum, the University of Arizona attempts the Grand Canyon. A swarm ofevents was included one event at Colorado City on to identify and locate all earthquakes that noted inthecanyonareainearlySeptember February 4 (M 3.2), two near Fredonia on affect southern Arizona (at latitudes lower 1988; three of these registered ML ~ 3.0 September 19lML3.7) and 21 (ML3.3), and than34° N). TUC can locate earthquakes of (Bausch, 1989). Activity subsided until March one on the Paria Plateau on December 31 ML ~ 2.5 in , Graham, Greenlee, 5,1989, whenthe South Rim was rocked by (Mr....3.6). Pima, Pinal, and Santa Cruz Counties and twoML4.0 earthquakes,the largestto occur Earthquake activity in Arizona during events of ML> 3.5 elsewhere in the State. in Arizona since the ML 5.0 Chino Valley 1989 occurred in two areas that had previ­ The background seismicity level for earthquake of1976. These two shocks caused ously been noted for their seismicity: the southern Arizona is quite low, especially only minor damage at Grand Canyon Vil­ Grand Canyon and Arizona Strip. The ex­ compared toCalifornia. The two most seis­ lage, but triggered several rock falls in the tensive seismicityonthe MogollonPlateau, mically active regions in southern Arizona canyon and associated earthquake lights however, was surprising. Historically,this are the southeastern corner of the State, (methane gas, or fireballs, expelled near area has been almost completely aseismic; extending north from Douglas along the faults, usually during large strike-slip events it will certainly bear watching in 1990. To border to the Clifton-Morenci that fracture the rocks). The maximum in­ aid observation, the Arizona Earthquake area, and the southwestern corner south of tensity of ground shaking reported was VI. Information Center is installing a perma­ Yuma along the Mexico-Arizona border. During the next week, more than 100 after­ nent seismograph station at Blue Ridge, During a typical year in southeastern Ari­ shocks wererecorded, 15 ofwhich wereML near the center of the Mogollon Plateau. zona, a single earthquakewithML>3.0 will

Fredonia\ 26 -4 0 0 -PARIA 24 RIZON~ STRII' PLATEAU 22 20 ·.,,~4.0 CfJw GRAND" '--4.0 360 ~ <{ 18 CANYON => a 16 I ML2-2.5 I-a: Flagstaff iii <{ 14 w LL 12 CHAVEZ MTN ~~ SUNSET MTN a • ..·MOGOLLON a: 10 w PLATEAU OJ o :;;; 8 => z 6 Phoenix 4 iii

2 Morenci iii iii 0+--,---.,...---,---,------,----,---4---,------.---,--+ Clifton 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89

YEAR Tucson III

o 0 I 110 Figure 1(above). Trend ofseismicactivity in northernArizonafor1980-89. M L = local magnitude. •ML = 2.0 - 2.9 Oouglas/ o. o M 2:. 3.0 SAN BERNAROINO~ EpicentersofearthquakesofML~2.0 L Figure2 (right). that occurred in Arizonaduring VALLEY 4.\2 ~ 1989. The three earthquakes of M L 4.0 are identified. See Table 1 for more precise magnitudes of other earthquakes.

6 Arizona Geology, vol. 20, no. 1, Spring 1990 occur. In contrast, during one year the Table 1. Arizona earthquakes (ML 2:. 2.0) detected in 1989 by the AEIC network and TUC station. Yuma area will be shaken by at least one l l 2 4 event with ML > 4.5. Most ofthe seismicity Date Latitude Longitude Depth Origin ML Epicenter that affects the Yuma region is actually lo­ (ON) (oW) (km) Time (UTC)3 cated in California or Mexico and is asso­ ciated with the southern terminus of the 2-4 36.80 112.92 5 12:26:58 3.2 Colorado City 2-5 32.490 114.630 2 21:51:12.6 3.2 southwest of Yuma San Andreas system. The seismicity in 2-5 32.400 114.610 6 22:05:15.9 3.2 southwest of Yuma southeastern Arizona appearsto be related 2-16 35.41 113.02 8.9 19:37:00 2.4 Aubrey Valley to the range fronts of the north- to north­ 3-5 36.02 112.10 10 00:40:32 4.0 Grand Canyon west-trending mountains. The most active 3-5 95 km from FLAG -- 00:45:?? 2.2 Grand Canyon 3-5 36.03 112.07 10 09:17:57 4.0 Grand Canyon regions have been southeast of Douglas in 3-5 36.09 112.13 5F 09:35:59 2.1 Grand Cyn. aftershock the San Bernardino Valley of Sonora and 3-5 36.04 112.16 5F 14:40:42 2.5 Grand Cyn. aftershock near Clifton-Morenci. 3-5 36.09 112.23 3F 17:22:10 2.0 Grand Cyn. aftershock The earthquake activity in southern 3-5 36.07 112.24 5F 20:51:10 2.2 Grand Cyn. aftershock 3-6 36.04 112.21 13.7 13:09:22 2.1 Grand Cyn. aftershock Arizona during 1989 was concentrated in 3-7 36.03 112.21 13.3 01:59:08 2.2 Grand Cyn. aftershock the San Bernardino Valley (Figure 2; Table 3-7 36.03 112.26 14.3 04:08:39 2.3 Grand Cyn. aftershock 1). The largest earthquake in this area in 25 3-7 36.04 112.16 7.4 08:24:40 2.5 Grand Cyn. aftershock 3-7 35.98 112.23 13.8 14:14:20 2.4 Grand Cyn. aftershock years oo::urred on May 25

1 FLAG = Seismic research station at University, Flagstaff 2 F = Fixed 3 UTC = Universal Time Coordinated 4 ML = Local magnitude

1989 Earthquake Tally Although the magnitude 7.1 Lorna significantearthquake as one thatregis­ Prieta earthquake that struck the Santa ters a magnitude of at least 6.5 or one of Cruz area of California on October 17 lesser magnitude that causes casualties made Americans especially earthquake or considerable damage. sensitive, the world actually had fewer In addition, the number (526) ofper­ significant earthquakes during 1989 than sons who died in 1989 as a result of the average for the past two decades. earthquakes was significantly lower than The 55 significant earthquakes during the number (28,000) who died in 1988 1989 were6fewer thanthetotal for 1988. and well below the average of 10,000 The U.S. Geological Survey defines a deaths per year.

Arizona Geology, vol. 20, no. 1, Spring 1990 7