DOCSLIB.ORG

Petroleum Potential of Wilderness Lands in Arizona by Robert T

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Petroleum Potential of Wilderness Lands in Arizona by Robert T Petroleum Potential of Wilderness Lands in Arizona By Robert T. Ryder PETROLEUM POTENTIAL OF WILDERNESS LANDS IN THE WESTERN UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 902-C This chapter on the petroleum geology and resource potential of Wilderness Lands in Arizona is also provided as an accompanying pamphlet for Miscellaneous Inves­ tigations Series Map 1-1537 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract ---------------------------------------- C1 Thickness and origin of sedimentary rocks --------- C13 Introduction------------------------------------- 1 Black Mesa basin--------------------------- 13 Geologic framework------------------------------- 2 Paleozoic hingeline area --------------------- 14 Physiographic provinces ------------------------ 2 Pedregosa basin---------------------------- 14 Wilderness Lands ----------------------------- 2 Tertiary rift basins ------------------------- 14 Tectonic provinces and tectonic history ------------ 2 Potential source rocks, hydrocarbon shows, and Colorado Plateau physiographic province ------- 2 thermal maturity---------------------------- 14 Basin and Range physiographic province-------- 8 Reservoirs and traps --------------------------- 15 Transitional zone--------------------------- 13 Summary statement --------------------------- 16 Petroleum geology-------------------------------- 13 Petroleum potential of Wilderness Lands-------------- 16 USGS petroleum province boundaries------------- 13 Summary ------------------------------------ 20 Oil and gas fields ------------------------------ 13 References cited---------------------------------- 20 ILLUSTRATIONS Page FIGURE 1. Maps of Arizona showing distribution of Wilderness Lands, counties, and selected cities. A, Physiographic and tectonic provinces; B, Major outcrops of igneous and metamorphic rocks and lines of cross sections; C, Oil and gas field data ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ C3 2. Geologic cross section A-A' through the Basin and Range and Colorado Plateau provinces of northwest Arizona- 6 3. Geologic cross section B-B' through the Black Mesa and Holbrook basins of northeast Arizona--------------- 7 4. Geologic cross section C-C' through the Pedregosa basin and superimposed Early Cretaceous rift basins of southeastArizona-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 5. Geologic cross section D-D' through the Pedregosa basin and superimposed Early Cretaceous rift basins of southeast Arizona-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 6. Geologic cross section E-E' through the Basin and Range province of southwest Arizona-------------------- 11 7. Geologic cross section F -F' through the Basin and Range province of southwest Arizona -------------------- 12 8. Map showing the qualitative estimates of petroleum potential for Wilderness Lands in Arizona -------------- 18 III PETROLEUM POTENTIAL OF WILDERNESS LANDS IN THE WESTERN UNITED STATES Petroleum Potential of Wilderness Lands in Arizona By Robert T. Ryder ABSTRACT much of the State is unsuitable for oil and gas ac­ On the basis of in-depth geologic framework and petroleum cumulations because basement rocks are situated geology studies, the oil and gas potential of Wilderness Lands at or near the surface. Future oil and gas dis­ in Arizona is rated qualitatively on a scale from high to zero. coveries in the sedimentary basins of Arizona will A high rating is assigned to Wilderness Lands that are located near or along the projected trend of hydrocarbon production likely depend on imaginative, but geologically and have all the geologic attributes of the producing area. A sound, interpretations of the complex structural, medium rating is assigned to Wilderness Lands that have all depositional, and magmatic history of the State the attributes, including shows, of an oil and gas producing and on the testing of these interpretations with area, but presently lack commercial production. In contrast, reflection seismic profiles and deep drilling. To low, low to zero, and zero ratings are assigned, respectively, to Wilderness Lands that have few or no attributes of an oil date, drilling outside the region of known produc­ and gas producing area. Usually a zero rating is reserved for tion has been disappointing. The purpose of this regions having autochthonous igneous and metamorphic rocks investigation is to provide qualitative estimates, at or near the surface. complete with written documentation, of the fu­ The Wilderness Lands in Arizona are grouped into 12 clus­ ture oil and gas potential of the 6,183,665 acres of ters, each containing one or more tracts that have the same or similar geologic characteristics and the same hydrocarbon po­ Wilderness Lands in Arizona. These estimates are tential. Of the 6,183,665 acres of Wilderness Lands in Arizona based largely on data derived from current pub­ the potential acreage can be summarized as follows: high po­ lished literature. Future estimates may vary as tential, none; medium potential, 192 thousand acres; low poten­ new data and concepts become available. tial, 1,375.3 thousand acres; low to zero potential, 3,528.8 thousand acres; and zero potential, 1,087.8 thousand acres. This report is divided into three parts. The first part, the geologic framework section, is intended INTRODUCTION to acquaint the reader with the complex physio­ graphic and geologic provinces of Arizona and the Arizona produces limited quantities of oil and complex tectonic and magmatic history that gas from fields in the northeasternmost part of the shaped the provinces and ultimately helped con­ State and has the potential for yielding modest un­ trol the distribution of oil and gas. The second discovered oil and gas resources (Dolton and part, the petroleum geology section, consists of a others, 1981). Much of Arizona is still a frontier general treatment of several key elements related area in terms of oil and gas exploration; however, to the generation and entrapment of oil and gas in C1 Arizona. The third and final part, the petroleum EXPLANATION potential of Wilderness Lands, contains the qual­ (For figures lA, 8, and C) itative estimates of the oil and gas potential of the Wilderness Lands of Arizona. ~\;;;): Metamorphic and igneous rocks-Precambrian ~ Metamorphic and intrusive igneous rocks­ GEOLOGIC FRAMEWORK Mesozoic and Tertiary PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES D Volcanic rocks-Quaternary, Tertiary, and Mesozoic Arizona is divided into two major physiographic provinces, the Colorado Plateau province in the Wilderness Lands northeast half of the State and the Basin and Range province in the southwest half of the State ~ Oil, natural gas, and helium fields with a transitional zone between (fig.1A). The Col­ orado Plateau province is characterized by a highly dissected landscape comprised of broad, x Oil seep high plateaus and mesas and intervening steep­ 0 Drill hole walled canyons (Fenneman, 1931). The Basin and 10 Phillips Arizona State No. 1-A drill hole Range province is characterized by narrow, north­ west-trending mountain ranges and adjoining ba­ " Outcrop section sins. In the northwest corner of Arizona the F F' --. Line of geologic cross section-Dashed line and mountain ranges change in orientation to north 0 circle indicate a drill hole projected into line of and north-northeast trends (fig. 1B). The north­ section west-trending, 50-60-mile-wide transitional zone, as here defined, is wider than the transitional zone -- Boundary between physiographic provinces defined by Wilson and Moore (1959). - · - Boundary between USGS petroleum provinces WILDERNESS LANDS --Boundary between tectonic provinces The 6,183,665 acres of Wilderness Lands in ........---.- Approximate leading edge of Cordilleran fold and thrust belt, Drewes (1979, 1980, 1981) Arizona are distributed over . the two physio­ graphic provinces and the transitional zone (fig.1A). Existing structural features are typified by broad About 70 percent of the Wilderness Lands is lo­ areas of flat-lying to gently tilted strata bound by cated in the Basin and Range province with the monoclines and (or) high-angle faults (figs. 2, 3). remaining 30 percent about eqJJally divided be­ First-order structural features include the Black tween the Colorado Plateau province and the Mesa basin, Defiance uplift, Echo Cliffs uplift, transitional zone. Four Corners platform, Kaibab uplift, Kaiparowits basin, and Zuni basin, all of probable TECTONIC PROVINCES AND Laramide age (Davis, 1978), the Holbrook basin of TECTONIC HISTORY Pennsylvanian and Early Permian age (Barwin The physiographic provinces, and to a large ex­ and others, 1971; Heylmun, 1981), and the tent the hydrocarbon accumulations within them Paradox basin of Pennsylvanian age (Peterson and are controlled by the tectonic framework of the' Ohlen, 1963) (fig.1A). Thick evaporites of Permian­ underlying rocks. The major tectonic features Pennsylvanian age and of Pennsylvanian age oc­ which shaped Arizona's physiographic provinces cupy, respectively, the central part of the Hol­ are identified and discussed in the following sec­ brook basin in Arizona and the Paradox basin in tion. southeast Utah and southwest Colorado. Many of the first-order structural features have been con­ trolled by an underlying basement-block mosaic COLORADO PLATEAU PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCE which probably developed in the Precambrian and The Colorado Plateau province represents a was reactivated by later episodes of crustal insta­ part of the North American craton which has been
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Journal of Arizona History Index, M
    Index to the Journal of Arizona History, M Arizona Historical Society, [email protected] 480-387-5355 NOTE: the index includes two citation formats. The format for Volumes 1-5 is: volume (issue): page number(s) The format for Volumes 6 -54 is: volume: page number(s) M McAdams, Cliff, book by, reviewed 26:242 McAdoo, Ellen W. 43:225 McAdoo, W. C. 18:194 McAdoo, William 36:52; 39:225; 43:225 McAhren, Ben 19:353 McAlister, M. J. 26:430 McAllester, David E., book coedited by, reviewed 20:144-46 McAllester, David P., book coedited by, reviewed 45:120 McAllister, James P. 49:4-6 McAllister, R. Burnell 43:51 McAllister, R. S. 43:47 McAllister, S. W. 8:171 n. 2 McAlpine, Tom 10:190 McAndrew, John “Boots”, photo of 36:288 McAnich, Fred, book reviewed by 49:74-75 books reviewed by 43:95-97 1 Index to the Journal of Arizona History, M Arizona Historical Society, [email protected] 480-387-5355 McArtan, Neill, develops Pastime Park 31:20-22 death of 31:36-37 photo of 31:21 McArthur, Arthur 10:20 McArthur, Charles H. 21:171-72, 178; 33:277 photos 21:177, 180 McArthur, Douglas 38:278 McArthur, Lorraine (daughter), photo of 34:428 McArthur, Lorraine (mother), photo of 34:428 McArthur, Louise, photo of 34:428 McArthur, Perry 43:349 McArthur, Warren, photo of 34:428 McArthur, Warren, Jr. 33:276 article by and about 21:171-88 photos 21:174-75, 177, 180, 187 McAuley, (Mother Superior) Mary Catherine 39:264, 265, 285 McAuley, Skeet, book by, reviewed 31:438 McAuliffe, Helen W.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning and Zoning
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Summary............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Overview ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Definitions Used in This Plan ....................................................................................... 1 1.3 How to Use the Plan .................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Land Use ...................................................................................................................... 2 1.5 Circulation .................................................................................................................... 3 1.6 Applicability .................................................................................................................. 3 1.7 Previous Comprehensive Plans ................................................................................... 3 1.8 Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan ................................................................... 3 2.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Role and Purpose of the Comprehensive Plan ............................................................ 5 2.2 Land Use Element........................................................................................................ 5 2.3
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Stand-Replacing Fire in Upper Montane Forests of the Madrean Sky Islands and Mogollon Plateau, Southwestern USA
    Fire Ecology Volume 7, Issue 3, 2011 Margolis et al.: Historical Stand-Replacing Fire doi: 10.4996/fireecology.0703088 Page 88 RESEARCH ARTICLE HISTORICAL STAND-REPLACING FIRE IN UPPER MONTANE FORESTS OF THE MADREAN SKY ISLANDS AND MOGOLLON PLATEAU, SOUTHWESTERN USA Ellis Q. Margolis1*, Thomas W. Swetnam1, and Craig D. Allen2 1University of Arizona Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, 105 W. Stadium, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA 2US Geological Survey Jemez Mountains Field Station, HCR 1, Box 1, Number 15, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87544, USA *Corresponding author: Tel.: 001-520-626-2733; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The recent occurrence of large fires with a substantial stand-replacing component in the southwestern United States (e.g., Cerro Grande, 2000; Rodeo-Chedeski, 2002; Aspen, 2003; Horseshoe 2, Las Conchas, and Wallow, 2011) has raised questions about the his- torical role of stand-replacing fire in the region. We reconstructed fire dates and stand-re- placing fire patch sizes using four lines of tree-ring evidence at four upper montane forest sites (>2600 m) in the Madrean Sky Islands and Mogollon Plateau of Arizona and New Mexico, USA. The four lines of tree-ring evidence include: (1) quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) and spruce-fir age structure, (2) conifer death dates, (3) traumatic resin ducts and ring-width changes, and (4) conifer fire scars. Pre-1905 fire regimes in the upper montane forest sites were variable, with drier, south-facing portions of some sites record- ing frequent, low-severity fire (mean fire interval of all fires ranging from 5 yr to 11 yr among sites), others burning with stand-replacing severity, and others with no evidence of fire for >300 yr.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Drought Preparedness Plan
    Arizona Drought Preparedness Plan OOPPEERRAATTIIOONNAALL DDRROOUUGGHHTT PPLLAANN Governor’s Drought Task Force Governor Janet Napolitano October 8, 2004 GOVERNOR’S DROUGHT TASK FORCE ARIZONA DROUGHT PREPAREDNESS PLAN Operational Drought Plan - 10-08-2004 GOVERNOR’S DROUGHT TASK FORCE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Governor’s Drought Task Force would like to thank Herb Guenther, Director of the Arizona Department of Water Resources and his staff for their support and assistance in the development of this Plan. Additionally, the Task Force would like to recognize the following individuals and organizations for their assistance and contributions: Mike Austin, Arizona Department of Water Resources Staff to the Task Force Sandy Whitney, Arizona Water Banking Authority (Coordinator) Carol Young, Arizona Department of Water Resources (Administrative Assistant) Workgroup/Committee Co-Chairs Commerce, Recreation & Tourism Jim Holt, Arizona Department of Water Resources Conservation Committee Marjie Risk, Arizona Department of Water Resources (Coordinator) Environmental Health, Watershed Management, Livestock & Wildlife Steve Barker, Natural Resources Conservation Service (Co-Chair) George Ruyle, University of Arizona (Co-Chair) Sandy Whitney (Co-Chair) Irrigated Agriculture Mike Hanrahan, Arizona Department of Water Resources (Co-Chair) Sheldon Jones, Agri-Business Council (Co-Chair) Monitoring Committee Gregg Garfin, University of Arizona – CLIMAS (Co-Chair) Tony Haffer, National Weather Service – Phoenix (Co-Chair) Municipal & Industrial Workgroup Tom
    [Show full text]
  • The Avifauna of Apache County, Arizona
    THE AVIFAUNA OF APACHE COUNTY, ARIZONA GARY H. ROSENBERG. Museum of Natural Science, Louisiana State University. Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803 SCOTT B. TERRILL, Departmentof BiologicalSciences, State Universityof New York at Albany, 1400 WashingtonAve., Albany, New York 12222 In general, the distributionand the seasonalstatus of the avifauna of Arizonaare fairly well understood.The Birdsof Arizona (Phillipset al. 1964) encompassesthe entirestate and is fairlycomplete for all seasons.Large sec- tions of the state, however, have received relatively little ornithological coverage. The entire region of Apache County in northeasternArizona is one such area. Even though this area is quite interestingornithologically, before 1976 it receivedlittle coveragerelative to the many popularbirding "hot spots"in other sectionsof the state. It is possibleto assemblea list of those speciesthat breed in Apache County usingPhillips et al. (1964), its revisionby Monson and Phillips(1981), and severaldetailed studies (e.g. Carotherset al. 1973, Franzreb1975). Yet there remain substantialgaps in our knowledgeof migrant, wintering,and some nestingspecies found in Apache County. Since the mid-1970s, primarilyas a resultof the "vagranthunting" boom that swept parts of the West, Apache County has been visitedrepeatedly during all seasons.A significantincrease in knowledge of the statusand distributionof birds in northeasternArizona has resulted. This paper em- phasizesthe diversityand ornithologicaluniqueness of Apache County and summarizes the status of the birds found there. Apache County coversan area of approximately15,000 km2 in the north- eastern corner of Arizona. It extends from the White Mountains in the south to the Utah border in the north. The entire eastern border is shared with New Mexico and the county extendsabout 85 km to its westernborder shared with Navajo County.
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of Adult Female Black Bear Daybeds
    CHARACTERISTICSOF ADULTFEMALE BLACK BEAR DAYBEDSIN NORTHERNARIZONA CHERYLM. MOLLOHAN,Arizona Game and Fish Department, 2222 Greenway Road, Phoenix, AZ 85023 Abstract: Ninety-four black bear (Ursus americanus) bedding sites were located between May 1982 and August 1984. Locations were identified by radio- tracking 14 adult females. Sampling from sites of females with and without cubs showed both bedding and feeding activity at 39% of the sites. Multiple daybeds were found at 28% of the sites and all sites were within 0.8 km of water. Bedding sites occurred on canyon walls 81% of the time, the slopes of which averaged 39%. Daybeds were on the uphill side of a tree 74% of the time. Bed trees averaged 73 cm dbh. Chewing and scratching of daybed trees was recorded at 38% of the sites, and scats were found at 69% of the sites. Removal of vegetative cover and large trees in black bear bedding habitat could reduce overall habitat quality. Int. Conf. Bear Res. and Manage. 7:145-149 Black bear activity patterns and habitat use have Basin Conifer Woodland (Brown et al. 1979). Ridg- been documented in the western United States (Am- etops below 2,100 m are predominately pinyon pine strup and Beecham 1976, Lindzey and Meslow 1977, (Pinus edulis) and alligator juniper (Juniperus dep- LeCount et al. 1984, Unsworth 1984, Young 1984, peana); ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) is on the Mollohan 1985). Young (1984) and Unsworth (1984) west-facing slopes of major canyons and mixed con- briefly discussed black bear bedding sites but gave ifer on the east-facing slopes.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Earthquake Activity in 1989
    Summary of Earthquake Activity in Arizona for 1989 NORTHERN ARIZONA ~ 2.0. The rest of1989 at theSouthRim was SOUTHERN ARIZONA quiet, except for three earthquakes of M by David S. Brumbaugh, Director 2.9,2.8, and 2.2 inSeptember, one of ML3.& by Terry C. Wallace Arizona Earthquake Information Center in November, and one ofML2.9 in Decem­ Department of Geosciences ber (Table 1). University of Arizona The year 1989 was marked by a sharp Activity onthe MogollonPlateau south­ increase in earthquake activity. This capped east of Flagstaff was initiated by an ML3.4 The University of Arizona operates a a trend during the last half of the decade earthquake at Chavez Mountain on April World Wide Standardized Seismic Network towards larger and more frequent events 18. Events continued through September (WWSSN) station, TUC, in the Catalina (Figure 1). The number of earthquakes of 1989, at times in swarms. Two other earth­ Mountains. The station's instrumentation local magnitude equal to or exceeding 2.0 quakes of ML~ 3.0 occurred onJuly 17 and consists of six seismographs: three short­ (ML~ 2.0) increased nearly200 percent over September 6. The latter shock was part ofa period components and three long-period that in 1988. Nearly all ofthe events were cluster of five events that day near Sunset components. The former are run at high concentrated in three areas in the northern Mountain. magnification (100,000 X) and are extremely part of the State: the Grand Canyon, the Other than the ML4.0 events at the can­ effective for monitoring seismic activity Mogollon Plateau, and the Arizona Strip yon, the largest earthquakes in northern within 500 kilometers of Tucson.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Arizona Highlands Ffolliott
    Central Arizona Highlands Ffolliott Chapter 1 Central Arizona Highlands Peter F. Ffolliott cooperators, this research continues to lead to a compre- hensive understanding of the ecology of the region, and to Introduction formulation of management guidelines that meet the in- creasing needs of people in the region and throughout the The Central Arizona Highlands are a distinct biogeo- Southwestern United States. graphic, climatic, and physiographic province that forms a diverse ecotone between the larger Colorado Plateau to the north and the Sonoran Desert ecoregions to the south (figure 1). The Highlands coincide approximately with the Climate Arizona Transition Zone identified by ecologists, geolo- gists and others. This region is one of the last in the Southwestern United States that was settled by European The Central Arizona Highlands, similar to other areas immigrants. in the state, are characterized by a cyclic climatic regime of With its unique and diverse landscape, the Central winter precipitation, spring drought, summer precipita- Arizona Highlands has been the focus of a wide range of tion, and fall drought. Precipitation usually comes from research efforts designed to learn more about the effects of the northwest in the winter and from the southeast in the natural and human induced disturbances on the function- summer. Winter precipitation, often snow at higher eleva- ing, processes, and components of the region’s ecosys- tions, is associated with frontal storms moving into the tems. Spearheaded by the USDA Forest Service and its region from the Pacific Northwest. Surface thermal heat- ing in the winter is less pronounced than in the summer; upslope air movement is relatively slow; cloudiness is common; and precipitation is usually widespread and relatively low in intensity.
    [Show full text]
  • Forage Production on Arizona Ranges, IV. Coconino, Navajo, Apache Counties: a Study in Range Condition
    Forage Production on Arizona Ranges, IV. Coconino, Navajo, Apache Counties: A Study in Range Condition Item Type text; Book Authors Humphrey, Robert R. Publisher College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) Download date 11/10/2021 16:13:43 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/213113 Forage Production on Arizona Ranges, IV. COCONINO, NAVAJO, APACHE Counties A Study in Range Condition BULLETIN 266 October, 1955 ORGANIZATION Board of Regents of the University and State Colleges of Arizona ERNEST W. MCFARLAND (ex officio), A.B., M.A., J.D., LL.DGovernor of Arizona CLIFTON L. HARKLNS (ex officio), B.S., M.A State Supt. of Public Instruction JOHN G. BABBITT, B.S Term expires January, 1957 MICHAEL B. HODGES, President Term expires January, 1957 JOHN M. JACOBS, Secretary Term expires January, 1959 EVELYN JONES KIRMSE, A.B., A.M Term expires January, 1959 ALEXANDER G. JACOME, B.S., Treasurer Term expires January, 1961 WILLIAM R. MATHEWS, A.B Term expires January, 1961 LYNN M. LANEY, B.S., J.D Term expires January, 1963 SAMUEL H. MORRIS, A.B., J.D., LL.D Term expires January, 1963 RICHARD A. HARVILL, Ph. D. President of the `University ROBERT L. NUCENT, Ph.D Vice- President of the University Experiment Station Administration RALPH S. HAWKINS, Ph.D Acting Director ARLAND R. MEADE, B.S., M.S Editor COVER PICTURE Aspens on the North Kaibab, in Coconino County Betts, October, 1955. 6M. Forage Production on Arizona Ranges IV. Coconino, Navajo, Apache Counties A Study in Range Condition By: Robert R. Humphrey1 FOREWORD Forage production on range lands is determined largely by three factors: productivity of the site, weather and management.In some areas, notably California and Florida, site productivity has been im- proved by fertilization.Other site -improvement techniques that have been used with success in some localities include pitting, ripping and contour furrowing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Grasshoppers and Other Orthoptera of Arizona
    The Grasshoppers and Other Orthoptera of Arizona Item Type text; Book Authors Ball, E. D.; Tinkham, E. R.; Flock, Robert; Vorhies, C. T. Publisher College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) Rights Copyright © Arizona Board of Regents. The University of Arizona. Download date 04/10/2021 13:31:26 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/190516 Technical Bulletin No. §3 June 15, 1942 Utttomttg fff Arfemta COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION THE AND OF ARIZONA BY E. D. BALL, K R. XIHKHAM, ROBERT FtocK, AND C. T. VQKBIES BY Itttaerattg ORGANIZATION BOABD OF BEGENTS Sidney P. Osborn (ex-of&cio).. Governor of Arizona E. D. Ring, B.A, (ex-officio). State Superintendent of Public Instruction APPOINTED MEMBERS Albert M. Crawford, B.S., President Prescott William H. Westover, LL.B Yuma Martin Gentry, LL,B Willcox Cleon T. Kmapp, LL.B.» Treasurer Tucson Jack B. Martin, Secretary,.,. Tucson M. O. Best Phoenix Clarence E. Houston, LL.B., B.A..... , ..Tucson Mrs. Joseph Madison Greet, B.A. Phoenix Alfred Atkinson, D.Sc .President of the University EXPJSBIMEHT STATION STAFF Paul S. Burgess, PhJX Dean and Director Ralph S. Hawkins, Ph,D ..Vice-Dean and Vice-Director ENTOMOLOGY AND ECONOMIC ZOOLOGY Charles T. Vorhies, Ph,D .Economic Zoologist •Elmer D. Ball, PhD ...™._ Entomologist Lawrence P, Wehrle, Ph.D...., , .„„. Associate Entomologist H, G* Johnston, Ph.D Associate Entomologist (Phoenix) *On leave. EBRWR Make following changes in numbers caa right hand margins only; Page 299, change "2^" to "26" Page 300, change "26" to "2k" Page 533, change "2V to "25" Pass 333, change "22" to "23" Page 33U, change "23" to "22" Page 33^, change "25" to "24" TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION.,.
    [Show full text]
  • R..Kix;:L' the GHIRICAHUA MOUNTAIN REGION
    The mammals of the Chiricahua Mountain region, Cochise County, Arizona Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Maza, Bernardo George, 1931- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 26/09/2021 18:38:25 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/551808 THE MAMMALS OF r..kix;:L' THE GHIRICAHUA MOUNTAIN REGION, COCHISE COUNTY, ARIZONA Bernardo G. Maza A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1965 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in The University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the University Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in their judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be ob­ tained from the author. APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below: E.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Strategy for the 4 Forest Restoration Initiative
    Landscape Strategy for the 4 Forest Restoration Initiative Overview: The 4 Forest Restoration Initiative (4FRI) is a collaborative, landscape‐scale restoration effort across 2.4 million acres of ponderosa pine forest on National Forest System lands in northern Arizona. Working collaboratively with 4FRI stakeholders, the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) has developed this landscape strategy to guide future 4FRI planning and to accompany a 4FRI proposal for funding under the Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program. This strategy is substantially complete and will be finalized in late 2010. The finalized landscape strategy will provide a framework that contributes information, analysis outputs, and guidance for a landscape‐scale, multi‐faceted restoration program. This strategy provides an overview of the effort and the need for active ecological restoration. Priority areas for future restoration activities are identified, along with an overview of how the 4FRI incorporates best available science and a strategy for engaging appropriately‐scaled wood products industries. Additional information needs and analytical steps needed to finalize this strategy are discussed herein. This document is not a decision document, but, rather, is meant to be a synthesis of data that identifies existing landscape conditions and establishes a programmatic context for subsequent decision‐making processes under the 4FRI. I. Introduction Ponderosa pine forests stretch almost continuously from the south rim of the Grand Canyon in north‐ central Arizona, across the vast Mogollon Rim to the White Mountains of eastern Arizona. Forests across this expanse surround and support communities, and provide invaluable wildlife habitat, recreational resources, and ecosystem services, ranging from clean water supply to carbon storage.
    [Show full text]