Sprintcity #6

UPDATE

Nº6 — 03|2014 METROPOLITAN CONNECTIVITY LANDSCAPE DELTA UD FUNCTIONS METROPOLIS

SprintCity #6

UD°6 UD°6

INITIATIVE STAKEHOLDERS

PARTNERS

SprintCity is an initiative of the Deltametrop- olis Association. The project is developed in collaboration with the project partners TU Delft and Movares. The knowledge partners and investors provide the necessary information, data and financial resources for SprintCity.

KNOWLEDGE PARTNERS KNOWLEDGE PARTNERS

PUBLIC AUTHORITIES KNOWLEDGE INSTITUTIONS

Ministry of Infrastructure & Environment Curtin University Perth/RMIT Melbourne Public Transport Agency Randstad Delft University of Technology (Urbanism/ StedenbaanPlus TPM) Radboud University Nijmegen (Planning) Province of Zuid-Holland University of Amsterdam (Planning) Province of Gelderland University of Applied Sciences Rotterdam Province of Noord-Holland (Spatial Planning) Province of Noord-Brabant Utrecht University (Geography) Province of Utrecht VU University Amsterdam (Geography) Province of Flevoland Wageningen University (Geography) KU Leuven Region of Amsterdam Artesis University College Antwerp Region of Arnhem-Nijmegen Region of BrabantStad PRIVATE ORGANISATIONS Region of Drechtsteden Region of Haaglanden AFFR Region of Holland-Rijnland ANWB Region of Utrecht APPM consultants Connexxion Departments of spatial planning, traffic & Goudappel Coffeng transport and housing of many municipali- Molster Stedenbouw ties in Noord-Holland, Utrecht, Zuid-Holland, Movares Noord-Brabant and Gelderland. MTR corporation (Hong Kong) NS Reizigers NS Poort TNO Perkins+Will (Atlanta) ProRail Schiphol Group CREDITS PROJECT TEAM

Project managers SprintCity: CREDITS Miriam Ram, Merten Nefs Deltametropolis Association: Paul Gerretsen (agent) Ronald Aarts Marjolein Dekker David Dooghe Update SprintStad #6 Mariana Faver Linhares 18.03.2014 Inge Hartkoorn Yvonne Rijpers Deltametropolis Association, Rotterdam Kito Samson Copies issued: 1.000 TU Delft CPS Development team: Additional copies can be ordered via Frans van Agthoven [email protected] Igor Mayer Sebastiaan Meijer or downloaded at Joël van Neerbos deltametropool.nl/nl/sprintstad Gert-Jan Stolk Linda van Veen See also twitter.com/deltametropool #SprintStad Movares Consultants: flickr.com/deltametropool Martijn Abeling nl.linkedin.com/in/deltametropool Bart Brenninkmeijer Jan Duffhues issuu.com/deltametropool Nicole van der Waart

I II

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEX

This document is property of the SprintCity timeline 6 Deltametropolis Association. The SprintCity project is an initiative of the Deltametrop- Make Space! 8 olis Association. Project partners TU Delft, Movares and the Next Generation Infra- The butterfly model 10 structures foundation are co-owner of the project. Creative Commons conditions apply The butterfly model applied 12 to the entire SprintCity project: Attribu- tion and ShareAlike (www.creativecommons. SprintCity 2.0 at the Zaan corridor 16 org). SprintCity Zuid-Kennemerland and IJmond 18 The SprintCity Planning Support Tool (serious game) is open-source and free to SprintCity international 20 use under the conditions mentioned above. The software may only be adapted in consul- SprintCity open-source 21 tation with the project partners. The source code of the serious game is shared intellec- Transit-oriented Beijing 22 tual property of the Deltametropolis Asso- ciation and Delft University of Technology. iNode information system for TOD 23

Planning 2014 24

IV SPRINTSTAD PREFACE

The SprintCity project was initiated by the Deltametropolis Association at the end of 2009 to investigate the opportunities for successful transit-oriented development (TOD) in the Dutch metropolitan region. It creates a bridge between science and practice. During the last four years, hundreds of station areas have been investigated, research methods and tools developed, and strategies for transit corridors unraveled together with stakeholders. This document is the sixth and final edition of the SprintCity Update. In the preceding five updates, we familiarized you with the principles of the project, the lineup of project partners, the inventory of station areas, the development of planning support tool SprintCity and other TOD-related events and publications. Update SprintCity #6 gives insight into the progress made in 2013, and provides a preview of 2014. The intensive collaboration with the province of Noord-Holland has resulted in new typologies for more than 60 station areas, a comparative butterfly model, and corridor overviews that correspond to challenges related to housing, working and landscape (to name but a few). The launch of the publication Make Space! Working on the development of station areas in Noord-Holland not only marked the broad dissemination of the research results, but also the political backing and support for Transit-Oriented Development in Noord-Holland. TOD now constitutes official policy (pages 8-9). The station typologies and the butterfly model were later adapted to other corridors, such as in the City region of Rotterdam, Stedenbaan Plus (the corridor between Haarlem and Dordrecht Zuid) and in the Ruhr Area in Germany (pages 12-13). In order to understand the new forms of coordination, planning and deci- sion-making that are necessary at the level of the corridor, two corridors in Noord- Holland were simulated in planning support tool SprintCity: the Zaan Corridor and the Zuid-Kennemerland Corridor. Several different scenarios were played out during sessions with researchers, municipal officials and administrators (pages 16-19). The planning support tool also underwent further development. Since the beginning of 2013, version 2.0 has been used, and the underlying data and mechanisms were once again checked and improved upon. Particularly the new interface of the transport company and the new functionalities for the province/region player have greatly improved the learning experience. With the launch of an English version (SprintCity), the planning support tool can now also be used globally. Initial preparation to make this a reality have already started (page 20). As of mid 2014, SprintCity will become open-source, enabling other parties to use and contribute to the further development of the software. The Deltametropolis Association is always looking for new collaborations at different levels (policymakers, researchers, graduate students) to enhance the development of TOD strategies. We are currently looking for partners in BrabantStad who are interested in engaging in an international partnership at the corridor level. For more information, see page 25 of this Update.

18.03.2014

5 SprintCityPUBLICATIONS update#6 EVENTS/ MEETINGS

SprintCity is mentioned in an Article ‘TOD in the Lowlands’ published in magazine Article about the application of Publication of the poster 27 Launching of the book Make Space! Article in scientific magazine article about Urban Planning S+RO, about the application of the SprintCity planning TOD-typologies published in the magazine S+RO, ‘Station typologies and challenges in the Old Line’, TOD in Noord-Holland, Environment and Games in support tool in a corridor of the province of Utrecht with the theme Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) in the Stedenbaan Monitor 2013 at the conference with the same name Planning B, about the the magazine Urbano with Bertus Cornelissen (Prov. Utrecht), Bastiaan in Amsterdam, in collaboration with mechanisms behind TOD (Metropolitan Redevelopment Janssen (BRU) and Bart Brenninkmeijer (Movares) the province of Noord-Holland and APPM and the development of Authority) SprintCity, in collaboration with Jan Duffhues publications Workbook#1 (municipality of Amsterdam) “TOD counter” and Igor Mayer (TU Delft) in collaboration with CRA 3 Participation in the workshop 9 Task force Mobility and Space 6 Task force Mobility en Space 3 Task force Mobility and 3-4 Discussions about station typologies 24 Knowledge exchange SprintCity Atelier Stad at VDM at VDM Space at VDM Blaak, Wilhelminaplein / Kop van Zuid, and projects Euro Immo Star in collaboration with the City Region of Rotterdam (development company of the case: corridor RandstadRail 8 Workshop about TOD with 4 Workshop Connecting 10 Meeting TOD 12 Start BNA community of 4 Task force Mobility and Space NMBS), in Brussels The Hague-Rotterdam Public Transport office Randstad living environments and -expert team with the province practice ‘designing TOD’, at VDM 4 TOD meeting case study ‘The Old Line’, station typologies, 29 Workshop about TOD in the of Noord-Holland, in Haarlem in Amsterdam BRU at Kpvv Utrecht with StedenbaanPlus 19 Knowledge exchange SprintCity 19 Excursion and knowledge gathering P+R, City Region of Rotterdam with 30 Kickoff Task force Space with Movinnio and Annemieke Molster in Utrecht 22 Kickoff meeting Zaan corridor approach and the provincie of and project Euro Immo Star experts and project leaders Zuid-Kennemerland, Kickoff European 4 Workshop #1 about TOD and SprintCity with with the province Zuid-Holland (development company of the NMBS), 23-27 Workweek ‘The Sino-Dutch Approach’, 1 Symposium “Switching 2 Knowledge exchange StedenbaanPlus, ‘Knooppuntenlegenda’ organized by the province at VDM research of Noord-Holland and municipalities, 6 Workshop about, among other themes, TOD or Staying?”, with OKRA, in Rotterdam Ministry of Infrastructure and the municipality of development of in Haarlem 13 Task force Mobility en Space 22 Networking meeting and workshop station Laan van NOI, in Beijing, China, in Delft and Environment Haarlem in collaboration with 8-24 Discussions about station typologies 10 Information meeting for designers, corridors Schelde at VDM in The Hague organized by Venhoeven CS 19 Workshop #2 about TOD 29 Expert team TOD about the adaptation of promising Grontmij and Venhoeven CS Rotterdam Central Station, Zuidplein, Vijfsluizen, 12 Task force Mobility & about the BNA Community of Practice Landschapspark and 19 StedenbaanPlus, Workshop and the Incentive Fund for the ‘Knooppuntenlegenda’ ‘Nodes and Chains’ station typologies in the 30 Meeting about bike 19 Metropolis forum Kralingse Zoom, Rotterdam-The Hague Airport, Space, ‘Designing TOD’, with BrabantStad, Spatial Development Creative Industry Ministry of Infrastructure in The Hague StedenbaanPlus station areas accessibility organized by VDM, Schiedam Centrum, Rotterdam Alexander Innovation Relay, RAI NS and municipalities with events/ meetings 27 Workshop TOD, organized ‘working with station typologies’ in Rotterdam organized by in Delft in collaboration with the City Region of Rotterdam of the Zaan corridor Euro Immo Star and Environment by Andrew Switzer, UvA StedenbaanPlus nov/ dec 2012 jan 2013 feb 2013 mar 2013 apr 2013 may 2013 jun 2013 jul 2013 aug 2013 sep 2013 oct 2013 nov 2013 dec 2013 2014

28 Simulation session of SprintCity 23 Simulation session SprintCity 1 Presentation SprintCity 24 SprintCity planning support tool 31 Presentation SprintCity 13 Simulation 1 Presentation SprintCity 22 Demonstration of SprintCity 12 Simulation session of 1 Launching of the with aldermen of the Launching open in Flanders, Belgium with planning support tool presented at Rail congress of the during the iTOD session of at TOD workshop, for the provincial executive SprintCity Task force Space English version municipalities in the source KU Leuven, NMBS, De Lijn, at the Institute of Architects city Turnhout, in Vlaanderen users’ group, SprintCity organized by the of Noord-Holland Zuid-Kennemerland, of SprintCity Zaan corridor, NS and version of SprintCity urban planners, Arcadis from Brazil in Rio de Janeiro at the UvA at the Artesis province Vlaams Brabant, T. Talsma with the province of provincial executive Talsma planning support and Grontmij (IAB-RJ), in Brazil university in Leuven Noord-Holland, NS and 23 Demonstration of SprintCity tool 19 Simulation session of SprintCity Zaan corridor 23 Paper presentation and college 27 Demonstration of 20 Simulation session and civil servants, for the curator of the Beijing Design Week, with PNH, NS and civil servants demonstration of SprintCity Antwerp, SprintCity of SprintCity with in Haarlem Lei Yang, at VDM 10 Launching SprintCity 31 Launching SprintCity planning in collaboration with Movares and TU Delft at the Plan Day (Plandag) Belgium op ISAGA conference 2013 researchers of in collaboration with Update #5 support tool version 2.0 2013, in Antwerp with at the KTH Stockholm Fields of View, Movares en TU Delft (in English) 15 Simulation session of 17 Presentation SprintCity planning support tool researchers, in Delhi en Bangalore, India

planning support tool 16 SprintCity planning support tool transport SprintCity with at the urban planning department of the state of tested for the ﬁrst time at a operators and master students of São Paulo, in Brazil Maptable with touch screen spatial planners Geomatics, TUDelft

29 ‘Changing TOD policies’ 12 TOD -opportunities’ maps and the 21 Presentation of 18 Presentation ‘state of the art’ TOD, 18 Presentation at 16 Presentation of station typologies, 18 Presentation about station typologies Movinnio Congress, positioning of the Station Oss in the rail network TOD-typologies at the Ministry of Infrastructure Symposium TOD applied at German stations, in the City region of Rotterdam in Day of Traffic and Mobility in collaboration with APPM and SprintCity and Environment in the Netherlands, with Maxwan, collaboration with the in Houten for traffic and at the UvA at Zukunftsforum in Essen City Region of Rotterdam Launching prototype TOD information system trasport officials 3 Presentation in the Administrative 28 Presentation about Presentation of the results Task force ‘iNode’, graduation project of Ernst Kuilder at the province 23 Dynamics in Rail Corridos Conference StedenbaanPlus innovations in TOD Space Zuid-Kennemerland in Haarlem (University of Wageningen) of CVS 2012 at the Movinnio symposium, in collaboration with at the Ministry of Infrastructure and Noord-Holland, in Amsterdam Day of Traffic and Mobility, Grontmij en Venhoeven CS Environment, DRO Amsterdam, municipality in Den Helder in Houten Haarlemmermeer and City Region

presentations Arnhem-Nijmegen

in samenwerking met:

6 SprintCity update#6 PLANNING SUPPORT TOOL PRESENTATIONS

presentations Arnhem-Nijmegen in samenwerking met:

7 WORKING ON TOD PROVINCE OF NOORD HOLLAND

In collaboration with the Province of Noord- MAKE Holland and APPM, the Deltametroplis Associa- tion has investigated more than 60 station areas in Noord- Holland. The result of this collaboration SPACE! is the publication Make Space! Working on the development of station areas in Noord-Holland which was presented at a conference in Amsterdam on the 27th of November 2013. The graphic design for the publication was carried out by Alfons Hooikaas and Florian Mewes. A new vision for spatial development in Noord Holland is presented in the book. The main focus is on making better use of the existing urban area and infrastructure. The publication brings together previous studies, combining existing knowledge and data to visualize and demonstrate the opportunities for public transport nodes in Noord-Holland. All station areas have been compared with each other using the butterfly model (page 10) and positioned in the network of the province, which consists of several corridors. Make Space! serves as basis and inspiration for further development of transit-oriented strategies in Noord-Holland. I II

CONFERENCE ON THE 27th OF NOVEMBER TEN PRINCIPLES

Ten Principles The ten principles together express the opportunities for an integral policy for housing, working, services and recreation, in combination with good accessibility. These ten principles are crucial in de- veloping a transit-oriented development strategy: not only for Noord-Holland, but also for other parts of the Netherlands.

1. FREQUENCY INCREASE 2. REALISE AT LEAST 50% OF 3.PRIORITISE EXISTING LAND AND SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT TE NEWLY-BUILT HOMES USE PLANS WITHIN THE ARE MUTUALLY WITHIN THE CATCHMENT URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY REINFORCING AREAS OF STATIONS AROUND STATIONS

4. ALIGN THE URBAN 5. REDUCE THE NUMBER OF 6. FOCUS ON THE QUALITY GROWTH BOUNDARY WITH VACANT OFFICES IN AREAS OF WORKING ENVIRON- THE TRANSIT-ORIENTED THAT ARE NOT MULTIMODAL MENTS IN THE MOST DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY ACCESSIBLE ACCESSIBLE LOCATIONS

7. LOCATE REGIONAL 8. A SMOOTHER TRANSFER 9. DEVELOP NODES AS FACILITIES PREFERABLY AT BETWEEN MODES OF ‘GATEWAYS’ TO THE MULTIMODAL, ACCESSIBLE TRANSPORT COUNTRYSIDE LOCATIONS

10. MAKE SPACE!

III IV

8 CORRIDORS CORRIDORS

Corridors The ideal level at which to coordinate transit-oriented development is the corridor level; a combination of a regional railway line and the land sur- rounding the stations along that line. At this level, it is possible to coordinate daily activities and move- ment patterns, and to fully optimise the accessibility, sustainability and agglomeration benefits. At the administrative level, the corridor also represents the most logical, workable unit. There are various types of corridors: residential corridors, mixed corridors and destination corridors. Depending on the type of corridor, the degree of control and need for coordination varies. Residen- tial corridors are mainly concerned with housing plans and improving the transfer between transport modes. Destination corridors are also concerned with these issues, but additionally focus on services, workplaces and their distance from and to the station (proximity). In the ‘ideal corridor’, living, working and services are evenly distributed, allowing the network to be utilised efficiently during both peak and off-peak

I II

CASE STUDY ZAAN CORRIDOR NEW SPATIAL PLANNING

hours. Mixed use creates a lively area throughout From research to policy the whole day. When stations within a corridor re- On the 8th of October 2013, Provincial Exec- inforce, rather than compete with, one another, then utives of the province of Noord Holland publically a daily urban system is created where the stations embraced the lessons from the Make Space! publica- along the railway line together form a complete city. tion by agreeing to apply the ten principles from the Eight corridors have been specified in the book to guide their policies. The Zaan Corridor was province of Noord-Holland. These corridors either thereby appointed as a pilot location. Together with start or end at the Ring of Amsterdam, at Amster- the local authorities, transport operators, real estate dam Central station or at Amsterdam South station. developers and housing corporations along the Zaan For each corridor, the existing plans, challenges and Corridor, the Provincial Executives want to make an opportunities have been laid out and linked to the intention agreement and prepare a programme of demand for housing and working places in that area. implementation. As a case study, APPM has developed a practi- cal process and organisational proposal for the Zaan Corridor. At the same time, the Deltametropolis As- Several hard copies are still available. Down- sociation developed a simulation of the Zaan Corri- load the pdf with an english summary (pages 224 - dor for the SprintCity planning support tool. 231) at www.deltametropool.nl/nl/maak_plaats

III IV

Zaancorridor

9 METHOD CONNECTION THE BUTTERFLY MODEL A node is a place where different modes of BUTTERFLY transportation meet and where a variety of urban NODE PLACE activities take place. Improving the integration between the network and the urban space in a node MODEL can reap several benefits. To gain a better under- standing of this, the so-called butterfly model has SLOW TRAFFIC PROXIMITY Presence of bicycle Intensity of use in the been developed by the Deltametropolis Association storage, bicycle rental, and ﬁrst 300 meters with rail crossings, network respect to the total in association with the province of Noord-Holland. density within 300 meters This model is based on three distinctive features for the node (network) and three distinctive features for 200 50% the place (physical space). The butterfly model was 140 30%

120 15% first applied and developed for the publication Make

100 7% Space! Working on the development of station areas 70 4% in Noord-Holland, and has since been applied to pro-

3200 1440 910 540 310 40 80 150 220 500 jects for StedenbaanPlus, the City Region of Rotter- PUBLIC TRANSPORT 90 8% INTENSITY Presence, frequency Denisty of inhabitants, dam and the Ruhr area (Germany). The model pro- and directions of public 160 11% employees, visitors transport modes bezoekers vides an opportunity to work with the stakeholders 230 15% (e.g. the province, municipalities, transport compa- 300 20%

430 40% nies and developers) to discuss the direction of new projects, give a clear overview of the corridors and to compare station areas with each other. ROADS DIVERSITY Presence of highways, Ratio of inhabitants and The butterfly model positions six characteris- highway exits, regional roads emplyees per hectare and parking facilities tics in relation to each other: with the ‘node value’ on

I II

NODE AND PLACE STATION TYPOLOGIES the left wing, and the ‘place value’ on the right wing. highway exit on the outskirts of a city. The position of the node in the public trans- A diverse variety of locations where the value portation network, the road network and the slow of node and place are in balance, combined with the traffic network is decisive for the node value of the desired market demand for residential and work- station in the butterfly model. The density of inhab- ing environments will provide the types (taxonomy) itants, employees and visitors, the degree of func- of ‘butterflies’ that have a real chance of success. tional diversity and its proximity (i.e. to what degree They demonstrate which developments will also fit is the station itself a center in its surroundings?) is in the Dutch context, and to the qualitative market decisive for the place value of the station. demand in the region. Each type of butterfly repre- The butterfly functions best when both wings sents a specific station typology: a place where liv- are in balance with each other. For this, the centre ing, working and services converge in a certain way. of the wings are particularly strongly related and di- The variation of typologies along a railway line or in rectly proportional to each other. The position in the a railway network can contribute to improving func- public transport network and the intensity of resi- tionality because the nodes can develop alongside dents, workers and visitors should ideally all be in each other, ensuring that they complement, rather balance. than compete with each other. The twelve typologies reflect ideal situations. Twelve Station Typologies In reality, many station areas still have far to go The relationship between node and place of- before they can achieve these promising typologies. fers different opportunities for new developments: a The difference between the butterfly representing Sprinter (local service) station, situated in the centre the current situation and the one representing the of a village, will offer different options than an In- promising situation directly indicates the task that tercity (express service) station that lies close to a is at hand.

III IV

10 DOWNTOWN METROPOLITAN CENTRE

WONEN Stedelijk naoorlogs grondgebonden / Stedelijk vooroorlogs / Kleinstedelijk / Centrum Centrum Centrum Stedelijk Groen stedelijk / stedelijk plus stedelijk kleinstedelijk naoorlogs compact Groen kleinstedelijk Centrum dorps * Landschap 3 8 6

GrootstedelijkeWO NEN toplocatie Stedelijk naoorlogs grondgebonden / Stedelijk vooroorlogs / Kleinstedelijk / Centrum Centrum Centrum Stedelijk Groen stedelijk / stedelijk plus stedelijk kleinstedelijk naoorlogs compactWereldstadGroen kleinstedelijk Centrum dorps * Landschap 3 8 6

Grootstedelijke Binnens tedelijke toplocatie centruml ocatie

Wereldstad Grootstad Binnenstad

Downtown Metropolitan Centre

Binnens tedelijke 38 6 Very lively centre around a public transportRandstedelijke node The most accessible places in Randstad Holland centruml ocatie ov-knoop- puntenlocatie

Grootstad Binnenstad Metropolitaan Centrum Current versus promising situation for the Downtown typology: Current versus promising situation for the Metropolitan Centre typology:

Regionale

Randstedelijke 38 6 ov-knoop- ov-knoop- puntenlocatie/ puntenlocatie WERKEN & VOORZIENINGEN WERKEN regionale voorzieningen Metropolitaan Regionaal Amsterdam Den HaagCentrum Rotterdam Utrecht Amsterdam Amsterdam Den HaagModerne StadSchiedamPoortkwartier Rotterdam Hubdorp Buitenpoort Centraal HS Blaak Centraal SloterdijkCentrum Bijlmer Arena Laan van NOI Centrum Alexander

Regionale ov-knoop- Kleinschalige WONEN puntenlocatie/ WONEN Stedelijk naoorlogs Stedelijkbedrijvigheid naoorlogs WERKEN & VOORZIENINGEN WERKEN I II grondgebondenregionale / (in woonwijken) voorzieningen grondgebonden / Stedelijk vooroorlogs / Kleinstedelijk / Stedelijk vooroorlogs / Kleinstedelijk / Centrum Centrum Centrum Stedelijk Groen stedelijk / Regionaal Moderne Stad Centrum Centrum Centrum Stedelijk Groen stedelijk / Poortkwartier Hubdorp Buitenstad Buitenpoort OV Kwartier Centrumdorp stedelijk plus stedelijk kleinstedelijk naoorlogs compactstedelijk plusGroen kleinstedelijkstedelijk Centrum dorpskleinstedelijk * LandschapCentrumHUBnaoorlogs VILLAGE compact Groen kleinstedelijk Centrum dorps * Landschap LANDSCAPE GATEWAY 3 3 8 8 6 6 HSL station Intercity station Sprinter station Bestemming: vooral werken Gemengd: wonen, werken Herkomst: vooral wonen Nabijheid Landschap en voorzieningen en voorzieningen Kleinschalige Grootstedelijke Grootstedelijke bedrijvigheid toplocatie toplocatie (in woonwijken)

Buitenstad OV Kwartier Centrumdorp Wereldstad Wereldstad

HSL station Intercity station Sprinter station Bestemming: vooral werken Gemengd: wonen, werken Herkomst: vooral wonen Nabijheid Landschap en voorzieningen en voorzieningen

Binnens tedelijke Binnens tedelijke centruml ocatie centruml ocatie

Grootstad Binnenstad Grootstad Binnenstad

Randstedelijke 38 6 Randstedelijke 38 6 ov-knoop- ov-knoop- puntenlocatie puntenlocatie

Metropolitaan Metropolitaan Centrum Centrum

Hub Village Landscape Gateway Regionale Regionale ov-knoop- ov-knoop- Multimodal accessible village centre Gateway to the landscape puntenlocatie/ puntenlocatie/

WERKEN & VOORZIENINGEN WERKEN (always in addition to one of the other typologies) regionale & VOORZIENINGEN WERKEN regionale voorzieningen voorzieningen Regionaal Moderne Stad Poortkwartier Regionaal Hubdorp Buitenpoort Moderne Stad Poortkwartier Hubdorp Buitenpoort Centrum Centrum Current versus promising situation for the Hub Village typology: Current versus promising situation for the Landscape Gateway typology:

Kleinschalige Kleinschalige bedrijvigheid bedrijvigheid (in woonwijken) (in woonwijken)

Breukelen Driehuis Halfweg- Uitgeest Amsterdam Castricum Haarlem Voorschoten Zandvoort Buitenstad OV Kwartier Centrumdorp Buitenstad Zwanenburg OV Kwartier Centrumdorp RAI Spaarnwoude aan Zee

HSL station Intercity station Sprinter station Bestemming: vooralHSL werkenstation Gemengd: wonen,Intercity werken station Herkomst: vooral wonenSprinter station Nabijheid LandschapBestemming: vooral werken Gemengd: wonen, werken Herkomst: vooral wonen Nabijheid Landschap en voorzieningen en voorzieningen Design collages: Alfons Hooikaasen voorzieningen en voorzieningen III IV

11 PLANNING SUPPORT TOOL PROVINCE OF NOORD-HOLLAND

Province of Noord-Holland THE The butterfly model was first developed in the publication Make Space! For each of the 64 nodes in the province of Noord-Holland, a most promis- BUTTERFLY ing station typology was determined, based on the market demand for living and working areas in its corridor. Besides the current situation, it was also MODEL investigated which changes could happen within the existing plan areas if they are developed according APPLIED to the characteristics of the most promising typology.

Voor elk stationsgebied (straal=1200m) langs de ‘Oude Lijn’ is een stationsprofiel Voor elk station is vervolgens bekeken welk van de 12 standaardprofielen het meest VLINDERDIAGRAM opgesteld in de vorm van een vlinderdiagram. Het diagram bestaat uit een knoopvleugel kansrijk is, aangegeven in blauw. Om dit kansrijke profiel te bereiken, waar knoop altijd in langzaam verkeer nabijheid (links), waarin de OV-bereikbaarheid, het langzaam verkeer en de autobereikbaarheid zijn evenwicht is met plaats, moet vaakI nog het één en ander gebeuren. Daarom is per station aanwezigheid ov-fiets, spoorwegovergangen Intensiteit van gebruik in de eerste II OPGAVEN PER STATION en fietsparkeervoorzieningen, fijnmazigheid 300 m ten opzichte van het totaal opgenomen; en een plaatsvleugel (rechts), waarin de intensiteit, nabijheid en menging zijn een actielijst opgesteld in de categorieën wonen, werken, voorzieningen, ketenmobiliteit netwerk binnen 300 m opgenomen. Voor uitgebreide uitleg over de profielen, zie www.stedenbaanplus.nl en landschap. In zwart wordt steeds de huidige situatie aangeduid, in blauw de opgaven. openbaar vervoer intensiteit Aanwezigheid, frequentie en KNOOP PLAATS De som van het aantal inwoners, werknemers richtingen van ov-modaliteiten en bezoekers per hectare invloedsgebied Publicatie StedenbaanPlus 2013 OP DE ‘OUDE LIJN’ Onderzoek en samenstelling STEDENBAAN PLUS STEDENBAAN PLUS Vereniging Deltametropool wegen menging Aanwezigheid van snelwegen, snelwegafslagen, Verhouding inwoners en werknemers Ontwerp AAN DE HAND VAN STATIONSPROFIELEN regionale wegen en parkeervoorzieningen op lokaal niveau (per 100x100m) Zinnebeeld

Corridor Haarlem – Den Haag Centraal Corridor Den Haag Centraal – Rotterdam Centraal CorridorStedenbaanPlus Rotterdam Centraal – Dordrecht Zuid Utrecht Utrecht HSL Schiphol HSL breda In order to better understand the dynamics of RR

Amsterdam the ‘Old Line’ (Haarlem – Dordrecht Zuid), the cur- Den Haag Centraal Schiedam Centrum Haarlem Heemstede-Aerdenhout Hillegom Voorhout Leiden Centraal De Vink Voorschoten Den Haag Mariahoeve Den Haag Laan van NOI Den Haag HS Den Haag Moerwijk Rijswijk Delft Delft Zuid Rotterdam Centraal Rotterdam Blaak Rotterdam Zuid Rotterdam Lombardijen Barendrecht Zwijndrecht Dordrecht Dordrecht Zuid Breda Uitgeest rent situation of each station was portrayed based on STATION Zandvoort RR HL/M RR/M M the butterfly model. Additionally,MLL the mostVlissingen promising in- en uitstappers per dag (NS 2012) 2.077 3.275 64.712 2.200 2.666 2.745 16.136 74.794 38.457 1.857 6.502 29.288 4.277 17.626 82.849 20.279 typology2.567 6.184was defined4.774 5.336for each21.417 station.1.166 This exercise immediately revealed the challenges that lie ahead STATIONSPROFIEL for each station. A list of action points was then de-

Binnenstad Buitenstad Centrumdorp + Poortkwartier Grootstad Poortkwartier Hubdorp + Poortkwartier Metropolitaan Wereldstad Grootstad Moderne Stad Regionaal Centrum Binnenstad Poortkwartier + Metropolitaan Wereldstad Grootstad Moderne Stad Moderne Stad Poortkwartier Buitenstad Binnenstad Poortkwartier Buitenpoort Buitenpoort Centrum Buitenpoort Centrum vised for each station along the following categories: Bollenstreek De Horsten / Midden-Delfland De Vlietlanden living, working, services, mobility and landscape. The station typologies are intended to help WONEN clarify the task at hand in conversations between municipalities and regions, as well as to facilitate

WERKEN the coordination of opportunities in a transit corridor and its development. During the process, the method was discussed with several municipalities. VOORZIENINGEN The feedback shows that the typologies proved to be

34.000 38.000 3.500 165 200 65.000 32.000 28.000 12.000 70.000 8.000 18.000 2.500 4.000 5.000 21.000 8.000 bezoekers / dag bezoekers / dag bezoekers / dag bezoekers / dag bezoekers / dag bezoekers / dag bezoekers / dag bezoekers / dag bezoekers / dag bezoekers / dag bezoekers / dag abezoekers helpful / dag bezoekers tool / dag forbezoekers naming / dag bezoekers / dagqualitiesbezoekers / dag andbezoekers / dagopportunities. The promising typologies clearly demonstrate the KETENMOBILITEIT ambitions, and a number of station areas had ambitions that were much greater than estimated. This STATION STATIONSPROFIEL WONEN Part of the poster in theWERKEN Stedenbaanplus 2013 monitor, VOORZIENINGEN KETENMOBILITEIT De focus van het Stedenbaannetwerk ligt op de stations van de ‘Oude Lijn’ Het kansrijke profiel wordt bepaald op basis van de huidige situatie en de ambities die de gemeente heeft Als er een opgave is voor het woonprogramma kan het gaan om kleine Het leegstandsprobleem van kantoren in de Zuidvleugel is dermate groot, dat prioriteren op Regionale voorzieningen zijn het meest kansrijk bijindicates de multimodaal ontsloten stations that(goed bereikbaar perbigger stepsDe opgaven voor destill keten zijn gebaseerd need op de beoogde to ontwikkeling be naar made in en op de verknoping met het wegennet en de lightrailverbindingen. voor het stationsgebied. of grote opgaven in landelijke of juist meer stedelijke milieus. stationslocaties alleen niet voldoende is (Stec groep). Er zal ook getransformeerd moeten worden, auto en OV). Zijn er geen of relatief weinig voorzieningen aanwezig, dan ligt er een opgave. Is daarbij ook de het kansrijke profiel. Is de bereikbaarheid via OV, langzaam verkeer of auto Sommige stations liggen dichtbij een recreatiegebied en hebben de mogelijkheid om dit beter toegankelijk met name bij niet-multimodaal ontsloten stations. De gemengde multimodaal bereikbare locaties intensiteit (de som van het aantal inwoners, werknemers en bezoekers per hectare invloedsgebied) te laag onvoldoende, dan staat er een opgave. Speciale aandacht wordt hier ook te maken. Het station wordt dan een Buitenpoort, een extra kwaliteit naast het stationsprofiel. opgave woningbouw design: Zinnebeeld zijn op de kantorenmarkt het meest in trek, en kennen dus vooral courante leegstand. voor het kansrijke profiel, dan ligt er een grote opgave voor voorzieningen. besteed aan het aantal benodigde fietsenstallingen. bestemmingsstation Sprinterstation Intercitystation centrum stedelijk buiten centrum groen stedelijk dorps landelijk the right direction. opgave toegankelijkheid recreatiegebied opgave voor transformatie (op basis van de stationsprofielen) opgave regionale voorzieningen bestaande regionale voorzieningen tekort fietsenstallingen opgave bereikbaarheid herkomststation M/HL/RR/MLL kleine opgave langzaam OV wegen + sterke (visuele) relatie tussen station en landschap MBO/ HBO/ courante leegstand opvullen + multimodaal bereikbaar * bezoekers per dag detailhandel bioscoop <500 verkeer lightrail/metro goed aangesloten huidige situatie + voorzieningen gericht op recreatie leegstand kantoren m2 van regionale Universiteit gemengd station op het regionale + + bezoekers per dag <2.000* x + zeer goed fietsnetwerk met fietsvoorzieningen opgave bron: Jones Lang LaSalle 2012 voorzieningen museum/ opgave M Metro wegennetwerk transformatie naar andere functies theater 500 – 1000 kansrijke profiel + heldere routeaanduiding + multimodaal bereikbaar dagattractie Een multimodaal station is HL Hoekse Lijn III Download the poster at http://www.steden- makkelijk te bereiken per auto RR RandstadRail + bezoekers per dag <2.000* vergader-/ grote opgave toekomstige leegstand van Ministeries JuBi, Buza en SZW is toegevoegd meerdere bronnen, ziekenhuis bron: LISA 2010 >1000 bron: ProRail grote opgave en per openbaar vervoer. MLL MerwedeLingeLijn bij stations Den Haag Centraal en Den Haag Laan van NOI + lage huidige intensiteit verwerkt door VDM congrescentrum baanplus.nl/content/monitor-stedenbaan

12 CITY REGION OF ROTTERDAM CITY REGION OF ROTTERDAM

HUIDIG 10000 20000 30000 40000 KANSRIJK FOCUS City Region of Rotterdam + In collaboration with the City Region of Rot- + + terdam, nine regional transit nodes were chosen and Rotterdam Alexander Metropolitaan Centrum analysed with the butterfly model. The relation be- + + tween these nodes and the existing programmes for + housing, work and services were thereby made visi- Rotterdam Blaak Grootstad + ble for the Rotterdam City Region. + +

The drawing up of the station typologies has Rotterdam CS Werelstad enabled a clear depiction of the differences of tran- + + sit nodes in the city region. Based on the analysis + and various discussions with stakeholders, the ‘best Rotterdam Kralingse Zoom Moderne Stad + case’ typology was defined for each station area. The + connection between the butterfly model and existing + Rotterdam Meijersplein/ Airport Poortkwartier research on housing, work and services in de Rot- + terdam region has led to different action points for + + each station. These actions will be taken as a start- Rotterdam Wilhelminapier Nieuwe Binnenstad ing point for future discussions concerning the areas. + + +

Rotterdam Zuidplein Nieuwe Binnenstad

+ Download the booklet: ‘Knooppunten in de + +

Stadsregio Rotterdam’ via www.deltametropool.nl/ Schiedam Centrum Metropolitaan Centrum nl/knooppuntontwikkeling_vlindermodel + + +

Vijfsluizen Poortkwartier I II

RUHR AREA RUHR AREA

Ruhr Area Maxwan urbanists & architects, LOLA Land- scape Architects and Goudappel Coffeng worked together with Thomas Sieverts and Paul Gerretsen on the ‘Ideenwettbewerb Zukunft Metropole Ruhr’. This idea competition is the basis for a spatial structure plan for the entire Ruhr area, which will require the strengthening of the cooperation between the municipalities that started working together around the IBA Emscher Park and the European Capital of Cul- ture in 2010. From the analysis, it became clear that the large number of stations and rail infrastructure in the region are not being used optimally, that there is no concentration of urban services and that there are too many different rail services competing with each other. The butterfly model, the twelve station typologies and the corridor played a central role in the ‘Ruhr evolution’: the strategy that they produced together. It highlighted which station areas and corridors are the most promising, and which urban in- vestments are likely to bring the highest return.

For more info, see: http://ideenwettbewerb.metropoleruhr.de/ruhrimpulse/planerteams/ IV team-b.html

13 ABCOUDE ALKMAAR ALKMAAR NOORD ALMERE ALMERE BUITEN ALMERE MUZIEKWIJK ALMERE OOSTVAARDERS ALMERE PARKWIJK ALMERE POORT AMERSFOORT AMSTERDAM AMSTEL AMSTERDAM BIJLMER ARENA

AMSTERDAM CS AMSTERDAM HOLENDRECHT AMSTERDAM LELYLAAN AMSTERDAM MUIDERPOORT AMSTERDAM-RAI AMSTERDAM SCIENCE PARK AMSTERDAM SLOTERDIJK AMSTERDAM ZUID ANNA PAULOWNA BAARN BARENDRECHT BEVERWIJK

BLOEMENDAAL BOVENKARSPEL FLORA BOVENKARSPEL GROOTEBROEK BREUKELEN BUIKSLOTERMEERPLEIN BUSSTATION AMSTELVEEN BUSSUM ZUID CASTRICUM DELFT DELFT ZUID DEN HAAG CENTRAAL DEN HAAG HS

DEN HAAG LAAN VAN NOI DEN HAAG MARIAHOEVE DEN HAAG MOERWIJK DEN HELDER DEN HELDER ZUID DIEMEN DIEMEN ZUID DORDRECHT CS DORDRECHT ZUID DRIEHUIS DUIVENDRECHT ENKHUIZEN

GOUDA HAARLEM HAARLEM SPAARNWOUDE HALFWEG-ZWANENBURG HEEMSKERK HEEMSTEDE-AERDENHOUT HEERHUGOWAARD HEILOO HILLEGOM HILVERSUM HILVERSUM NOORD HILVERSUM SPORTPARK

HOLLANDSCHE RADING HOOFDDORP HOOGKARSPEL HOORN HOORN KERSENBOOGERD KOOG BLOEMWIJK KOOG-ZAANDIJK KROMMENIE-ASSENDELFT LEIDEN CENTRAAL LEIDEN-DE VINK LELYSTAD MAARSSEN

NAARDEN-BUSSUM NIEUW VENNEP OBDAM OVERVEEN PURMEREND PURMEREND OVERWHERE PURMEREND TRAMPLEIN PURMEREND WEIDEVENNE RIJSWIJK ROTTERDAM ALEXANDER ROTTERDAM BLAAK ROTTERDAM CENTRAAL

ROTTERDAM LOMBARDIJEN ROTTERDAM NOORD ROTTERDAM ZUID SANTPOORT NOORD SANTPOORT ZUID SASSENHEIM SCHAGEN SCHIEDAM CENTRUM SCHIPHOL UITGEEST UTRECHT CENTRAAL UTRECHT OVERVECHT

UTRECHT ZUILEN VIJFSLUIZEN VOORHOUT VOORSCHOTEN WEESP WINKELCENTRUM SCHALKWIJK WORMERVEER ZAANDAM ZAANDAM KOGERVELD ZANDVOORT AAN ZEE ZUIDPLEIN ZWIJNDRECHT

Node:KNOOP: HSLHigh-speed/ / INTERNATIONAAL international STATION ExpressINTERCITY service STATION LocalSPRINTER service / METRO / BUS STATION PLAATS: BESTEMMING: VOORAL WERKEN EN VOORZIENINGEN GEMENGD: WONEN, WERKEN EN VOORZIENINGEN HERKOMST: VOORAL WONEN NABIJHEID LANDSCHAP ABCOUDE ALKMAAR ALKMAAR NOORD ALMERE ALMERE BUITEN ALMERE MUZIEKWIJK ALMERE OOSTVAARDERS ALMERE PARKWIJK ALMERE POORT AMERSFOORT AMSTERDAM AMSTEL AMSTERDAM BIJLMER ARENA