Omnibus Appropriations Conference Report for FY2003 and California Implications -- February 27, 2003

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

THE CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE FOR FEDERAL POLICY RESEARCH

419 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, D.C. 20003 202-546-3700

Fax: 202-546-2390 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.calinst.org

SPECIAL REPORT:
Omnibus Appropriations Conference
Report for FY2003 and California

Implications -- February 27, 2003

CONTENTS:

On February 12, 2003, congressional negotiators agreed to a
$397.4 billion FY03 Omnibus Appropriations Conference Report, H.J. Res. 2, which incorporates the eleven unfinished appropriations measures

Department of Justice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Department of Commerce . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

for non-military domestic spending into one package. After four months

Department of the Interior . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

passing temporary stop-gap spending measures to maintain government operations, the House passed the bill on February 13 by a vote of 338-83, after the Motion to Recommit failed by a largely party line vote of 193-

Army Corps of Engineers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Department of Energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Department of Labor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

226. The Senate passed the Conference Report on February 14.
The final funding level is about $11.5 billion more than the
$385.9 billion limit the White House had imposed on Congress. In order

Department of Health and Human Services
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

to offset additional spending for education and other programs, the bill

Department of Education . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

includes a 0.65 percent across-the-board spending cut. However, Head Start, the Space Shuttle program, VA medical care, and the Women Infants and Children’s (WIC) program are exempted from the cut.

Department of Transportation . . . . . . . . . 15 Department of Agriculture . . . . . . . . . . . 20

The following updates the preliminary analysis that the

Department of Veteran Affairs . . . . . . . . 22

California Institute prepared on February 13, (See, Bulletin, Vol. 10, No, 3 (2/13/03), and summarizes some of the major provisions in the bill of

Department of Housing and Urban
Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

particular concern to California. It represents a quick analysis of the

National Aeronautics and Space
Administration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

Omnibus bill from a California perspective as prepared by the California Institute. We apologize for any errors or omissions in our discussion of

National Science Foundation . . . . . . . . . . 26

these documents, and would appreciate any input/feedback on how to make improving corrections. The ordering of items does not mean to imply any relative importance.
This appropriations analysis is available on the California

Institute web site at http://www.calinst.org/pubs/omn03c.htm and a

printable version in Adobe Acrobat (“pdf”) format is available at

http://www.calinst.org/pubs/omn03c.pdf .

Environmental Protection Agency . . . . . . 27 Institute of Museum and Library Services
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

Federal Emergency Management
Administration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

General Services Administration . . . . . . . 29

COMMERCE-JUSTICE-STATE APPROPRIATIONS

Spending for the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State are basically held at FY02 levels. Total funding for discretionary spending is set at $41.3 billion, compared to $41.4 billion in FY02 and the President’s request of $41.8 billion.

California Institute Appropriations Special Report - FY2003 Omnibus Conference Report - February 27, 2003, Page 2

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

The State Criminal Alien Assistance Program (SCAAP) will receive only $250 million in funding, as opposed to the $565 million appropriated in FY02. The program partially reimburses the states for the costs of incarcerating undocumented criminal aliens. California receives almost 40 percent of the funding; in FY02 the State, county and local governments received $220.24 million in SCAAP funds.

State & Local Law Enforcement and Byrne Grants

A total of $2.065 billion is provided for State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance. The Local Law
Enforcement Block Grant program is level funded at $400 million, and Byrne grants are funded at $650,914,000, of which $150,914,000 is for discretionary grants. The Conference Report also stipulates that the following California programs be considered for Byrne Discretionary Grants:
$200,000 for San Marcos for a community policing initiative;$1,500,000 for the City of Los Angeles for the Community Law Enforcement and Recovery anti-gang program
$1,000,000 to expand the Los Angeles Community Law Enforcement and Recovery anti-gang program to the Hollenbeck division;
$300,000 for the City of Norwalk for the Gang-Free Communities program; $500,000 for the Los Angeles Community Development Commission to expand its crime and safety program;
200,000 for the Solano County multi-jurisdictional response team.

Bureau of Justice Assistance

Within the amounts appropriated, the conferees expect BJA to examine each of the following proposals, to provide grants if warranted, and to submit a report to the Committees on Appropriations on its intentions for each proposal:
$300,000 for the City of Arcadia for a regional public safety training facility; $500,000 for the Public Safety Academy in the Santa Clarita Valley; $1,250,000 for the San Diego County Sheriff ´s Department for automation infrastructure improvements; $250,000 for the Redlands Police Department for law enforcement technologies; $250,000 for the Riverside Police Department for technology enhancements; $200,000 for the Woodland Police Department for law enforcement equipment and technologies; $250,000 for the Orange County, Sheriff ´s Department of Santa Ana for mobile data terminals; $2,000,000 for the Los Angeles County Sheriff ´s office for a training equipment; $50,000 for the City of Rialto for anti-terrorist technology; $50,000 for the City of Rialto for anti-terrorist technology; $250,000 for the Los Angeles County Sheriff ´s Department for a mobile communications system; $250,000 for Orange County for Mobile Data Terminals; $111,000 for the San Louis County Sheriff ´s Department for law enforcement technologies; $1,000,000 for Placer County for public safety communications upgrades; $157,000 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an emergency communications program; $350,000 for the City of Upland communications and technology upgrades; $500,000 for the City of Roseville to improve communications among public safety agencies; $500,000 for Imperial County for the development of an inter-agency emergency communications system; $250,000 for the Los Angeles County Sheriff ´s Department for a mobile communications system; $250,000 for the City of Belmont $1.3 million for the San Joaquin Valley Rural Agricultural Crime Prevention Program; $200,000 for San Marcos for a community policing initiative; $1.5 million for the City of Los Angeles for the Community Law Enforcement and Recovery anti-gang program;
$1 million to expand the LA Community Law Enforcement and Recovery anti-gang program to the
Hollenbeck division;
$500,000 to the LA Community Development Commission to expand its crime safety program; $200,000 for the Solano County multi-jurisdictional response team;

California Institute Appropriations Special Report - FY2003 Omnibus Conference Report - February 27, 2003, Page 3

$80,000 to the Marysville police department for a mobile command center; and $180,000 for the Homeless Outreach Team in San Diego. $40 million is also provided for the Southwest Border Prosecution program under the Community
Oriented Policing Services account.

Office of Justice Programs

Within the overall amounts recommended, the conferees expect OJP to examine each of the following proposals, to provide grants if warranted, and to submit a report to the Committees on Appropriations its intentions for each proposal:
$500,000 for San Bernardino for an electronic crime report filing system; $1,000,000 for the San Bernardino Sheriff’s Department for the SECURES gunshot detection system project;
$500,000 for Ventura County for an integrated justice information system; and $250,000 for Sacramento County Sheriff ´s Department for records management and communications systems.
Within the overall amounts recommended for the Crime Laboratory Improvement and DNA Backlog
Elimination Programs, the OJP is instructed to examine each of the following proposals, provide grants if warranted, and submit a report to the Committees on its intentions for each of the following California proposals:
$500,000 for the City of Whittier for forensic science equipment; $2,000,000 for the Department of Justice of the State of California for the Integrated Laboratory
Information Management System;
$250,000 for the Sacramento County Sheriff ´s Department to modernize its data infrastructure; $500,000 for the Anaheim Police Department for their School Gang Officers Division; $150,000 for the City of Rialto for the Police Activities League program; $500,000 for Orange County Fire F.R.I.E.N.D.S. program, to help reduce juvenile fire setting; $2,000,000 for the Los Angeles BEST youth program; $500,000 for the Elysian Valley United Community Services in Los Angeles for youth programs; and $100,000 for Fresno County for the Keep Kids in School program.

Immigration and Naturalization Service

Immigration enforcement activities will receive $6.159 billion. The bill fully funds at $362 million the
Entry Exit program to track the arrival and departure of non-U.S. citizens, and removes a funding prohibition on the National Crime Laboratory Improvement and DNA Backlogging Elimination programs. Additional funds of $57 million are also included to hire another 570 Border Patrol Agents, and $25.5 million in additional funds is provided to hire 460 land border Immigration Inspectors. The bill also funds the hiring of 760 new airport and seaport inspectors and support personnel. After the new hires, the total number of Border Patrol Agents will be 11,000. $14 million in funding is also provided for construction of the Border Patrol Station at El Centro, and $1 million is appropriated for San Diego Border Barriers
In total, the Omnibus Conference Report provides $3.5 billion in assistance to state and local First
Responders; $2.4 billion in the Commerce-Justice section of the bill and $1.1 billion in the VA-HUD and Independent Agencies section.

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

The Conference Report requires the Secretary of Commerce to institute a capacity reduction program for
West Coast groundfish fisheries. It also directs that a referendum on an industry fee system take place and that individuals with permits for Washington, Oregon, or California Dungeness crab and Pink shrimp are eligible to vote in the referendum to approve an industry fee system, and it requires the Department to publish a public notice in the Federal Register and issue an invitation to bid for reduction payments.

Small Business Administration

California Institute Appropriations Special Report - FY2003 Omnibus Conference Report - February 27, 2003, Page 4

- $1,100,000 is provided for a grant to the City of Los Angeles to develop a facility to support downtown business development; and
- $500,000 is provided for a grant to the California State University, San Bernardino for development of the Center for the Commercialization of Advanced Technology.

INTERIOR APPROPRIATIONS

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Funding for the Department of the Interior also remains relatively flat compared to FY02 funding, and below the President’s request. The Omnibus contains $19.1 billion in funding, whereas President Bush had requested $19.5 billion, and FY02 funding was $19.2 billion. The majority of the decrease in spending comes from the Department’s conservation programs, which are cut by $200 million, 15 percent less than FY02.
The Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILT) program will receive a $10 million increase to $220 million in
FY03 funding.
The bill provides $26 million in funding for the Quincy Library Group. $2,000,000 is authorized to provide grants, to be divided equally, to Nevada, California, the Truckee
Meadows Water Authority, and the Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe, to implement the Truckee River Settlement Act.
The bill prohibits any appropriated funds from being used to determine the final point of discharge for the interceptor drain for the San Luis Unit until development by the Secretary of the Interior and the State of California of a plan that conforms to the water quality standards of the State of California, as approved by EPA, to minimize any detrimental effect of the San Luis drainage waters.
The Conference Report states that the costs of the Kesterson Reservoir Cleanup Program and the costs of the San Joaquin Valley Drainage Program are to be classified by Interior as either reimbursable or nonreimbursable and collected until fully repaid. Any future obligations of funds by the United States relating to, or providing for, drainage service or drainage studies for the San Luis Unit must be fully reimbursable by San Luis Unit beneficiaries of such service or studies pursuant to Federal reclamation law.
The bill prohibits the use of appropriated funds for the conduct of offshore preleasing, leasing and related activities placed under restriction in the President´s moratorium statement of June 12, 1998, in the areas of northern, central, and southern California; the North Atlantic; Washington and Oregon; and the eastern Gulf of Mexico south of 26 degrees north latitude and east of 86 degrees west longitude.
The Conference Report also includes a Sense of the Congress Resolution regarding the 36 undeveloped southern California offshore oil leases that states that the Secretary of the Interior should not approve any exploration, development, or production plan for, or application for a permit to drill on those leases at any time while the lessees are engaged in settlement negotiations with Interior for the retirement of the leases.

Land Acquisition

The conference agreement provides $33,450,000 for land acquisition instead of $47,486,000 as proposed by the House and $30,150,000 as proposed by the Senate. Funds for California projects are to distributed as follows:
Cosumnes River Watershed (easements only) - $2,500,000 El Dorado Preserve - $2,000,000 Potrero Creek - $2,000,000 King Range National Conservation Area - $2,000,000 Oregon and California Grant Lands - $105,633,000 is appropriated for management, protection, and development of resources and for construction, operation, and maintenance of access roads, reforestation, and other improvements on the revested Oregon and California Railroad grant lands, on other Federal lands in the Oregon and California land-grant counties of Oregon, and on adjacent rights-of-way; and acquisition of lands or interests therein including existing connecting roads on or adjacent to such grant lands.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

California Institute Appropriations Special Report - FY2003 Omnibus Conference Report - February 27, 2003, Page 5

- not less than $2,000,000 is be provided to local governments in southern California for planning associated with the Natural Communities Conservation Planning (NCCP) program.

Construction

The conference agreement provides $54,427,000 for construction instead of $53,108,000 as proposed by the House and $42,882,000 as proposed by the Senate. Funds are to be distributed as follows:
Klamath Basin NWR Complex, Water supply and management-Phase IV - $1,000,000; Sonny Bono Salton Sea NWR, Seismic safety rehabilitation of shop building-Phase II - $200,000; San Diego NWR - $2,000,000 Fox Theatre - $200,000 Touro University School of Nursing, Vallejo - $250,000 Channel Islands NP (animal protection devices) - $2,116,000 Death Valley NP (replace maint facility) - $2,007,000 Golden Gate NRA (Alcatraz barracks) - $1,210,000 Golden Gate NRA (Cliff House) - $1,914,000 Joshua Tree NP (repair campgrounds) - $70,000 SF Maritime NHP (C.A. Thayer) - $1,000,000 Mojave National Preserve - $1,000,000 Point Reyes National Seashore - $1,500,000 Santa Monica Mountains NRA - $1,000,000

Economic Action Programs
Facilities, Capital Improvement Projects

San Bernardino NF, Big Bear Center - $550,000 San Bernardino NF, dogwood cmpgrd rehab. - $1,500,000 Stanislaus NF, Emigrant impound. rehab - $80,000 Lake Tahoe basin, NV/CA - $700,000

U.S. Forest Service - National Forest System
Land Acquisition

The conference agreement provides $133,815,000 for land acquisition instead of $146,336,000 as proposed by the House and $145,763,000 as proposed by the Senate. Funds for California are to be distributed as follows:
Lake Tahoe Basin: Critically Sensitive Lands (CA/NV) - $4,000,000 Los Padres NF: Big Sur Ecosystem - $3,000,000 Multiple NFs: Pacific Crest Trail (CA/OR/WA) - $3,000,000 San Bernardino NF - $2,000,000 Tahoe NF: North Fork American River-SPI - $2,000,000

Acquisition of lands for national forests special acts

$1,069,000, to be derived from forest receipts, is provided for the acquisition of lands is several national forests, including the Angeles, San Bernardino, Sequoia, and Cleveland National Forests in California.
Funds are also provided for payments to Del Norte County, California pursuant to the Smith River
National Recreation Area Act.

General Provisions

Section 315 authorizes the Secretaries of Agriculture and the Interior are authorized to limit competition for watershed restoration project contracts as part of the "Jobs in the Woods" Program to individuals and entities in historically timber-dependent areas in the States of Washington, Oregon, northern California, Idaho, Montana, and Alaska that have been affected by reduced timber harvesting on Federal lands. The Secretaries are directed to

California Institute Appropriations Special Report - FY2003 Omnibus Conference Report - February 27, 2003, Page 6

consider the benefits to the local economy in evaluating bids and designing procurements that create economic opportunities for local contractors.

ENERGY AND WATER APPROPRIATIONS

Energy and Water programs will be boosted from $25.30 billion in FY02 to $26.16 billion in FY03, about $300 million more than the President requested. The Conference Report provides $917 million for the Bureau of Reclamation, an increase of $72 million over the President’s request and $2 million above the FY02 level.
California Bay-Delta projects will receive $23 million under the bill, as opposed to the $30 million contained in the Senate version. Funding for the Environmental Water Account was decreased from $15 million to $9 million. The conference report also retains the Senate language authorizing the Interior Department and other federal agencies to continue to participate in the CALFED Bay-Delta Authority. Interior is also authorized to undertake feasibility studies for the Sites Reservoir, Los Vaqueros Reservoir Enlargement, and Upper San Joaquin Storage projects. Language providing for a feasibility study of In-Delta Storage, however, was dropped. The provision also calls for these studies, as well as environmental and other projects, to be pursued in a balanced manner.

Elk Hills School Lands Fund

The payment of $36 million is appropriated for the State of California for the State Teachers’ Retirement
Fund from the Elk Hills School Lands Fund.

ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

The Corps of Engineers will receive $4.6 billion, $28 million less than FY02, but $457 million over the
President’s request. Among the projects specifically funded are:
- $1 million for the Napa River Salt Marsh Restoration project; - about $3 million to complete the feasibility study and initiate preconstruction engineering and design for the Sacramento and San Joaquin Comprehensive Basin Study;
- $7 million for the San Timoteo Creek (Santa Ana River Mainstem); - an additional $2 million for Corps projects in the Sacramento area. The report does not include specific funding for the Port of Stockton study requested by the House, but states that funds for this are included in the San Francisco to Stockton project under the Construction, General account.
$4.5 million is also provided for the Coastal Field Data Collection Program, of which $1 million is for the
Southern California Beach Processes study.
Under General Provisions, the Secretary of the Army is directed to accept advance funds, pursuant to section 11 of the River and Harbor Act of 1925, from the non-Federal sponsor of the Los Angeles Harbor project, which are needed to maintain the project schedule.
The Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, is also directed to use $3,160,000 to undertake work to expand or improve recreational facilities and undertake environmental restoration activities at the Hansen Dam Recreation Area, California, consistent with the Hansen Dam Recreation Area Master Plan:
The Corps is also directed to use appropriated funds to rehabilitate the existing dredged material disposal site for the project for navigation at Bodega Bay Harbor, California, and to initiate maintenance dredging of the Federal channel.
The project for flood control for Terminus Dam, Kaweah River, California is modified to authorize the
Corps to construct the project at a total cost of $50,000,000, with an estimated Federal share of $28,600,000 and an estimated non-Federal share of $21,400,000.

California Institute Appropriations Special Report - FY2003 Omnibus Conference Report - February 27, 2003, Page 7

Army Corps of Engineers - General Investigations Earmarks

General investigations earmarks for the Army Corps of Engineers include:
Aliso Creek Mainstem $300,000; American River Watershed $1.28 million; Arana Gulch Watershed $50,000; Arroyo de la Laguna $100,000; Ballona Creek $175,000; Bolinas Lagoon $300,000; California Coastal Sediment Master Plan $100,000; City of Inglewood $200,000; City of Norwalk $100,000; City of San Bernardino $250,000; City of Santa Clarita $100,000; South Coast - LA County $350,000; Coyote Dam $100,000; Desert Hot Springs $200,000; Eastern Municipal Water District $150,000; Estudillo Canal $100,000; Folsom Dam $100,000; Grayson and Murderer’s Creeks $200,000; Huntington Harbor Dredging $100,000; Laguna Creek Watershed $100,000; Laguna de Santa Rosa $100,000; Llagas Creek $325,000;Los Angeles County $225,000; Los Angeles County Drainage Area (Cornfields) $100,000; Lower Cache Creek (Yolo County) $250,000; Lower Mission Creek $500,000; Malibu Creek Watershed $200,000; Marin County Shoreline - San Clemente Creek $25,000; Marina Del Rey and Ballona Creek $275,000; Matilija Dam $200,000; Middle Creek $50,000; Morro Bay Estuary $250,000; Mugu Lagoon $250,000; Dry Creek in Middletown $200,000; Lower Sacramento River Riparian Revegitation $100,000; Napa River Salt Marsh Restoration $1 million; Newport Bay $300,000; Newport Bay/San Diego Creek Watershed $250,000; Ocean Beach $50,000; Santa Ana River Basin $200,000; Coast Beach Erosion - Orange County $250,000; Orange County SAMP $300,000; Pajaro River at Watsonville $500,000; Pajaro River Basin Study $100,000; Fine Flat Dam $200,000; Poso Creek $200,000; Prado Basin $50,000; Riverside County SAMP $1 million; Rock Creek and Keefer Slough $25,000; Russian River Ecosystem Restoration $200,000; Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta $100,000; Sacramento-San Joaquin Comprehensive Basin Study $3.1 billion; San Bernardino County $200,000; San Clemente Shoreline $398,000; San Diego SAMP $600,000; San Diego County Shoreline $500,000; San Francisco Bay $300,000; San Jacinto River $250,000; San Joaquin River Basin (various) $900,000; San Juan Creek $200,000; San Pablo Bay Watershed $240,000; Santa Ana River - Big Bear Lake $300,000; Santa Clara River - City of Santa Clarita $200,000; Santa Cruz Port $50,000; Santa Rosa Creek Watershed $260,000; Santa Ynez River $50,000; Solana-Encinitas $500,000; Sonoma Creek $150,000; Strong and Chicken Ranch Sloughs $100,000; Sutter County $677,000; Tahoe Basin $1.5 million; Tijuana River Valley $300,000; Tujunga Wash Restoration $100,000; Upper Guadalupe River $200,000; Upper Penitencia Creek $559,000; Upper Santa Ana River Watershed $150,000; Ventura and Santa Barbara County Shoreline $200,000; Ventura Harbor Sand Bypass $150,000; Westminster- Coyote and Carbon Canyon Creek Watersheds $50,000; Westminister - East Garden Grove $300,000; White River and Deer Creek $150,000; Whitewater River Basin $350,000; Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks $50,000.

Recommended publications
  • Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan

    Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan

    Napa County Airport Land Use Commission Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan Calistoga Gllderport NAPA COUNTY AIRPORT [AND USE COMMISSION Daniel M. Jonas, Chairman (1989-91) Kathryn J. Winter, Chairperson (1991-92) Tony Holzhauer, Chairman (1 992-94) Mary E. Handel, Chairperson (1 994-95, 1998) John W. Whitridge, Ill, Chairman (1995-96) Juliana Inman, Chairperson (1996-98) Jim King, Chairman (1 998-2000) COMMISSION STAFF Jeffrey R. Redding, Executive Officer Michael Miller, Deputy Planning Director/ALUC Staff Laura J. Anderson, Deputy County Counsel SHUT[ MOEN ASSOCIATES STAFF Michael A. Shutt, Principal David P. Dietz, Director of Planning Projects Coleen AL more, Word Processing and Publication Todd Eroh, Graphics Technician Revised 12/15/99 Table of Contents PART I — INTRODUCTION 1 — INTRODUCTION PURPOSE 1-1 ROLE 1—1 Napa County Airport Land Use Commission 1-2 AUTHORITY 1-2 RELATIONSHIP TO LOCAL PLANS 1-2 Overruling 1-4 GENERAL APPROACH 1-4 ORGANIZATION OF THE PLAN 1-5 2 — COMPATIBILITY CONCERNS NOISE IMPACTS 2-1 Assessment of Airport Impacts 2-1 Noise Compatibility Concepts 2-2 FLIGHT HAZARDS 2-4 Assessing Hazards to Flight 2-4 Limiting Flight Hazards 2-4 SAFETY 2-5 Assessing Safety mpacts 2-5 Limiting Risks of injury or Damage 2-5 OVERFLIGHT IMPACTS 2-6 Assessing Overfligh: Impacts 2-6 Overflight Compatibility Concepts 2-7 PART III * POLICIES, PLANS, AND CRITERIA 3— POLICIES SCOPE OF REVIEW 3-1 Geographic Area o’ Concern Types of Airport Impacts 3-1 Types of Actions Reviewed 3-2 Review Process 3-3 PRIMARY REVIEW POLICIES 3-4 Land
  • City of Pittsburg

    City of Pittsburg

    City of Pittsburg Emergency Operations Plan December 2018 City of Pittsburg Emergency Operations Plan This page intentionally left blank. ii December 2018 City of Pittsburg Emergency Operations Plan Emergency Operations Center Activation QuickStart Guide The City of Pittsburg (City) Emergency Operations Center (EOC) serves as support to the command and control by the on-scene incident response. When an incident occurs, there is often insufficient information to determine if the EOC should be activated or how long an activation may last. If this condition occurs, a virtual or partial EOC activation may be initiated. More detailed information on emergency activations levels is contained in Section 4.2.3. Once an EOC activation is commenced, the first arriving staff should use the QuickStart Guide to efficiently setup and operate the EOC. When activated, the EOC responds to the impacts that any incident has on employees, facilities, critical and other infrastructure, and business functions. The EOC carries out this function through: • Information Collection and Evaluation • Operational Planning • Resource Management • Priority Setting • Overall Priorities - Life/Safety - Incident Stabilization - Property Preservation iii December 2018 City of Pittsburg Emergency Operations Plan EOC ACTIVATION CHECKLIST COMPLETED Date/Time TASK Activate the City EOC by assuming the role of EOC Director. Follow building inspection instructions. Consider which EOC should be activated based on damage and inspections. Establish the level of activation with the City Manager’s Office. Use Everbridge to send an EOC Activation notification to staff. The EOC Supply Cabinets are in various areas and contain appropriately titled boxes for each EOC Section. Place the appropriate material at each of the identified workstation locations.
  • Inventory of Existing Conditions

    Inventory of Existing Conditions

    Buchanan Field Airport Master Planning Program Field A. INVENTORY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Buchanan A > Inventory of Existing Conditions INTRODUCTION. Buchanan Field Airport (CCR) is the major general aviation reliever airport serving Contra Costa County and multiple communities located in the northeastern portion of the greater San Francisco Bay Area (see Figure A1). The Airport has been a catalyst for business growth in the region and has served as an anchor for the local employment base, as well as meeting the aviation transportation needs. Situated in an unincorporated portion of Contra Costa County, directly adjacent to the thriving urban heartbeat of the City of Concord, Buchanan Field Airport is a vital component of the transportation infrastructure serving the region for tourism and business. Buchanan Field Airport is well equipped to serve regional demand related to general aviation and business aviation needs. The Airport has a reputation as being an excellent aviation facility that offers a safe and efficient operational environment. The Bay Area continues to experience significant increases in business activity, commercial and residential growth, and economic development. Because of this, Buchanan Field Airport is also being presented with increasing operational and facility demands. Many of the areas surrounding the Airport, with many high quality homes and environmental amenities, have experienced significant residential development, resulting in homeowner concerns about the effect that the Airport may have on their lifestyle. Some of these homes and facilities are located within a two to three mile radius of the Airport. Thus, the Airport may influence the social, economic, and physical environments of the area in which it operates.
  • American Canyon Emergency Operations Plan

    American Canyon Emergency Operations Plan

    CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON AMERICAN CANYON FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN 2009 - 1 - American Canyon Emergency Operation Plan LETTER OF PROMULGATION Approval Date: 11/17/2009 To: Officials, Employees and Citizens of American Canyon The preservation of life, property and the environment is an inherent responsibility of local, state, and federal government. The City of American Canyon has prepared this emergency operations plan to ensure the most effective and economical allocation of resources for protection of people and property in time of an emergency. While no plan can completely prevent death and destruction, good plans carried out by knowledgeable and well-trained personnel can and will minimize losses. This plan establishes the emergency organization, assigns tasks, specifies policies and general procedures, and provides for coordination of planning efforts of the various emergency staff and service elements utilizing the National Incident Management System (NIMS). The objective of this plan is to incorporate and coordinate all the facilities and personnel of the City into an efficient organization capable of responding effectively to any emergency. This emergency operations plan is an extension of the State Emergency Plan. It will be reviewed and exercised periodically and revised as necessary to meet changing conditions. The American Canyon City Council gives its full support to this plan and urges all officials, employees and the citizens, individually and collectively, to do their share in the total emergency effort of American Canyon. This letter promulgates the American Canyon Emergency Operations Plan, constitutes the adoption of the American Canyon Emergency Operations Plan and the adoption of the National Incident Management System by the City of American Canyon.
  • Aviation in California: Benefits to Our Economy and Way of Life

    Aviation in California: Benefits to Our Economy and Way of Life

    Aviation in California: Benefits to Our Economy and Way of Life JUNE 2003 PUBLIC USE AIRPORTS BY FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION Commercial/Primary (29) Metropolitan (20) Regional (66) Community (102) Limited Use (33) Joint Use — Military/Commercial (2) The contents of this report reflect the views of the author who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the State of California or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. This report was prepared with funds from a grant provided by the United States Government (80%) and funds from the State of California (20%). Aviation in California: Benefits to Our Economy and Way of Life FINAL REPORT Prepared for BUSINESS,TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF AERONAUTICS Submitted by Economics Research Associates JUNE 2003 ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY ADVISORY COMMITTEE Nancy Benjamin Alan R. Tubbs Study Project Manager District Field Services Manager California Department of Transportation Airborne Express, Mather Field Division of Aeronautics Chuck Oldham R. Austin Wiswell Robert Chung Chief California Transportation Commission California Department of Transportation Division of Aeronautics Carl Williams Senior Policy Director Michael Armstrong California Space Authority, Inc. (CSA) Senior Lead Planner Southern California Association of Governments Bonnie Cornwall (SCAG) Program Manager Division
  • Runway Safety Report Safety Runway

    Runway Safety Report Safety Runway

    FAA Runway Safety Report Safety Runway FAA Runway Safety Report September 2007 September 2007 September Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20591 www.faa.gov OK-07-377 Message from the Administrator The primary mission of the Federal Aviation Administration is safety. It’s our bottom line. With the aviation community, we have developed the safest mode of transportation in the history of the world, and we are now enjoying the safest period in aviation history. Yet, we can never rest on our laurels because safety is the result of constant vigilance and a sharp focus on our bottom line. Managing the safety risks in the National Airspace System requires a systematic approach that integrates safety into daily operations in control towers, airports and aircraft. Using this approach, we have reduced runway incursions to historically low rates over the past few years, primarily by increasing awareness and training and deploying new technologies that provide critical information directly to flight crews and air traffic controllers. Other new initiatives and technologies, as outlined in the 2007 Runway Safety Report, will provide a means to an even safer tomorrow. With our partners, FAA will continue working to eliminate the threat of runway incursions, focusing our resources and energies where we have the best chance of achieving success. To the many dedicated professionals in the FAA and the aviation community who have worked so tirelessly to address this safety challenge, I want to extend our deepest gratitude and appreciation for the outstanding work you have done to address this ever-changing and ever-present safety threat.
  • Cal Guard Mobilizes for Deadly Northern California Wildfires Pages 2-12

    Cal Guard Mobilizes for Deadly Northern California Wildfires Pages 2-12

    SeptemberSeptember -- OctoberOctober 20172017 Vol.12Vol.12 No.No. 44 GRIZZLYGRIZZLYOfficialOfficial NewsmagazineNewsmagazine ofof thethe CaliforniaCalifornia NationalNational GuardGuard Cal Guard mobilizes for deadly Northern California wildfires pages 2-12 40th Infantry Division deploys to Afghanistan on 100th anniversary of its founding pages 13-15 www.calguard.ca.gov/pa Leadership Corner Wildfires illustrate importance of your service Major General David S. Baldwin The Northern California wildfires struck Napa, So- two MQ-9 remotely piloted aircraft, which provided aching bones and muscles after long shifts. We were lano and Sonoma counties in October with incredible imagery and data collection for incident commanders. called to duty and our state residents appreciated the swiftness and fury—the most deadly and destructive fact that we were there in their time of need. wildfires in California history. Military police, combat engineers, and transporta- tion Soldiers and Airmen mobilized to assist civilian The Northern California wildfires will go down as one Hundreds of thousands of acres were scorched. More emergency-response agencies by performing search of the worst tragedies in California history. It is just than 8,000 homes and structures were burned, and and recovery, security, traffic control, and escorting for such tragedies that we exist—to support and as- more than 100,000 people displaced, many of them evacuated residents back to their homes. We trans- sist our own communities and civil authorities during finding temporary homes in evacuation centers. ported supplies and people in our vehicles. We even state emergencies. Our response to the recent fires is Hundreds were unaccounted for as the fires, driven provided translators and cultural liaisons, military at- the heart of our state mission.
  • Airport Code Table (Sorted by City)

    Airport Code Table (Sorted by City)

    BOE-810-FTI (S1) (5-10) STATE OF CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION Airport Code Table (Sorted by City) APC City Name A26 Adin Adin Airport L54 Agua Caliente Springs Agua Caliente Airport L70 Agua Dulce Agua Dulce Airpark A24 Alturas California Pines Airport AAT Alturas Alturas Municipal Airport 2O3 Angwin Virgil O. Parrett Field (Angwin-Parrett Field) APV Apple Valley Apple Valley Airport ACV Arcata / Eureka Arcata Airport MER Atwater Castle Airport AUN Auburn Auburn Municipal Airport AVX Avalon Catalina Airport 0O2 Baker Baker Airport BFL Bakersfield Meadows Field L45 Bakersfield Bakersfield Municipal Airport BNG Banning Banning Municipal Airport O02 Beckwourth Nervino Airport O55 Bieber Southard Field L35 Big Bear City Big Bear City Airport BIH Bishop Eastern Sierra Regional Airport BLH Blythe Blythe Airport D83 Boonville Boonville Airport L08 Borrego Springs Borrego Valley Airport BWC Brawley Brawley Municipal Airport 7C4* Bridgeport MCMWTC Heliport (7CL4) O57 Bridgeport Bryant Field F25 Brownsville Brownsville Airport BUR Burbank Bob Hope Airport L62 Buttonwillow Elk Hills - Buttonwillow Airport C83 Byron Byron Airport CXL Calexico Calexico International Airport L71 California City California City Municipal Airport CLR Calipatria Cliff Hatfield Memorial Airport CMA Camarillo Camarillo Airport O61 Cameron Park Cameron Airpark C62* Camp Roberts McMillan Airport (CA62) SYL Camp Roberts / San Miguel Roberts AHP CSL Camp San Luis Obispo O’Sullivan AHP CRQ Carlsbad McClellan - Palomar Airport O59 Cedarville Cedarville Airport 49X Chemehuevi
  • Comprehensive Revitalization Plan for the Oroville Municipal Airport Fixed Base Operations (FBO) Facility

    Comprehensive Revitalization Plan for the Oroville Municipal Airport Fixed Base Operations (FBO) Facility

    Comprehensive Revitalization Plan for the Oroville Municipal Airport Fixed Base Operations (FBO) Facility Pursuant to the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Prepared By: Michael A. Hodges President and Chief Executive Officer & Randy D. Bisgard Senior Vice President Airport Business Solutions “Valuation and Consulting Services to the Aviation Industry” 13529 Prestige Place, Suite 108, Tampa, Florida 33635-9772 Phone (813) 269-2525 Fax (813) 269-8022 December 31, 2008 Ms. Sharon Atteberry City Administrator City of Oroville 1735 Montgomery Street Oroville, California 95965-4897 RE: Comprehensive Revitalization Plan For the Oroville Municipal Airport Fixed Base Operations (FBO) Facility Oroville, California Dear Ms. Atteberry: Per our engagement with the City of Oroville, we are pleased to present this Comprehensive Revitalization Plan for the Oroville Municipal Airport Fixed Base Operations (FBO) Facility. The following report provides our assessment and recommendations relative to current issues and future opportunities at the Airport, FBO, and within the community. The recommendations and requirements herein are included as possible actions for implementation to assist the City of Oroville in achieving their goals and objectives. In the development of this document, Airport Business Solutions researched many sectors of the local and regional general aviation market, specifically the northern California and Western region of the U.S. The goals and objectives of this Revitalization Plan for the Airport and FBO operations were to improve the financial situation of the Airport and the City and increase service demand, which will ultimately create new jobs in the area. Within this Revitalization Plan, recommendations and/or requirements are included as potential actions for implementation relating to the strategy contained herein.
  • Western-Pacific Region (AWP) Runway Safety Plan, FY 2020

    Western-Pacific Region (AWP) Runway Safety Plan, FY 2020

    COMMITTED TO CONTINUOUSLY IMPROVING SURFACE SAFETY. Western-Pacific Region (AWP) Runway Safety Plan FY20 2019-2020 RUNWAY SAFETY COUNCIL (RSC) #47 www.faa.gov Executive Summary The Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) Safety Program (RSP). This cross-organizational top priority is maintaining safety in the National directive establishes policy, assigns responsibility, TABLE Airspace System (NAS). The long-term goal for and delegates authority for ensuring compliance runway safety is to improve safety by decreasing with this order within each organization. The AWP OF CONTENTS FAA Safety Management System (SMS) 4 the number and severity of runway incursions Regional Runway Safety Governance Council (RI), runway excursions (RE) and serious surface (RSGC) is chaired by the Regional Administrator incidents (SI). and composed of the Regional Runway Safety Regional Runway Safety Plan (RRSP) Methodology Program Managers (RRSPM) and executives 6 FAA’s National Runway Safety Plan (NRSP) 2018-2020 or designees from the Airports Division, Flight aligns our strategic priorities with established Safety Standards Service and Air Traffic Organization Risk Management principles. The plan defines how Western Service Area and Western Service Center the FAA, airports, and industry partners collaborate FY20 RRSP Initiatives Directors. Each council member identified and 8 and use data-driven, risk-based decision-making to designated their line of business (LOB) expert enhance the safety of the National Airspace System. representative on the Regional Runway Safety Team (RRST). In response to the agency goal and the NRSP, the APPENDIX E lists the members of Safety Assurance 10 Western-Pacific Region (AWP) has developed the RRST. this Regional Runway Safety Plan (RRSP) to As directed by the RSP, the RRST is tasked with provide a roadmap with added regional emphasis identifying regional priorities and working through Safety Risk Management (SRM) for FY2020.
  • Special Traffic Management Procedures for Arrivals and Departures in the San Francisco Bay, Napa Valley and Monterey Peninsula Area

    Special Traffic Management Procedures for Arrivals and Departures in the San Francisco Bay, Napa Valley and Monterey Peninsula Area

    Bay Area Operators Urged to Make Plans for the Super Bowl ™ Now Due to the large number of aircraft expected for Super Bowl 50 ™, the FAA has announced special traffic management procedures for arrivals and departures in the San Francisco Bay, Napa Valley and Monterey Peninsula area. The FAA is not imposing a slot requirement, however all aircraft will require an FBO ramp reservation for arrivals and departures in the days preceding and following the event. Operators planning flights to airports in the vicinity between February 4 and February 8, 2016 should contact their preferred FBO to secure space as soon as possible. Operators should also remember that the TSA typically announces flight restrictions 3-5 days prior to the game. “It’s never too early to book space for what is expected to be one of the most memorable games to ever be played in the Bay Area. We are focused on customer service, ease of transition from Napa to Levi’s Stadium and safety for all of our guests,” explained NATA Member and Napa Jet Center CEO Mark Willey. The specific airport Arrival and Departure Procedures are available from the FAA in the current NOTAM edition available below: Concord (CCR) - Buchanan Field Hayward (HWD) - Hayward Executive Airport Hollister (CVH) - Hollister Municipal Airport Livermore (LVK) - Livermore Municipal Airport Moffett Field (NUQ) - Moffett Federal Airfield Monterey (MRY) - Monterey Regional Airport Napa (APC) - Napa County Airport Oakland (OAK) - Oakland International Airport Salinas (SNS) - Salinas Municipal Airport San Francisco (SFO) - San Francisco International Airport San Jose (SJC) - Norman Y. Mineta International Airport Santa Rosa (STS) - Charles M.
  • Runway Safety Report

    Runway Safety Report

    FAA Runway Safety Report Safety Runway FAA Runway Safety Report June 2008 June 2008 June Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20591 OK-08-3966 www.faa.gov Message from the Administrator A successful flight — whether trans-oceanic in a commercial airliner or a short trip in a private airplane — begins and ends with safe ground operations. While within the purview and oversight of the Federal Aviation Administration, runway safety is at the same time the ongoing responsibility of pilots, air traffic controllers, and airport ground vehicle operators. Through training and education, heightened awareness, enhanced airport signage and markings, and dedicated technology, FAA is providing each of these constituencies with the tools required to significantly improve runway safety. The ultimate goal is to reduce the severity, number, and rate of runway incursions; this report details a number of accomplishments and encouraging trends toward that end. A glance at the Executive Summary provides an overview of runway incursion data as well as numerous initiatives either completed, underway or about to begin. Serious runway incursions, which involve a significant reduction in adequate separation between two aircraft and where the risk of a collision is considerable, are trending favorably. In fiscal year 2007, these types of incur- sions were down 23 percent from the previous year and at their lowest total during the past four years. Since 2001, serious runway incursions are down 55 percent. In August 2007, we met with more than 40 aviation leaders from airlines, airports, air traffic controller and pilot unions, and aerospace manufacturers under a “Call to Action” for Runway Safety.