DOCSLIB.ORG

Species Proposals Working Documents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Species Proposals Working Documents August 2019 SPECIES PROPOSALS Pages 1-30 WORKING DOCUMENTS Pages 31-76 Dear Delegates and Colleagues: On behalf of the global family of Member Organizations of the Species Survival Network, I am pleased to share with you SSN’s Digest, our summary and analysis of the documents to be considered at the 18th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to CITES, here in Geneva, Switzerland. CoP18 promises to be a landmark meeting. Parties will debate, deliberate and decide on more than 160 documents, covering issues of crucial importance at a time when the world’s wild fauna and flora face unprecedented pressure from a human population that is 3 billion more than it was when CITES was enacted, 45 years ago. We believe that this Digest will provide Parties, as well the media and civil society, with easy access to the information and analysis they need, both to facilitate a well-informed debate, and to reach the best possible outcomes. We encourage Party representatives to take advantage of the provisions of CITES to do their utmost to protect wild species from the excesses of unsustainable trade, and to remember that when we improve the survival prospects of wild species we safeguard the welfare of the vulnerable human communities that depend on them. We urge Parties, too, to recognize that where live trade is involved, the welfare of every living individual must be a key priority. Together with all my SSN colleagues, I wish you every success and commend your efforts on behalf of the species we all seek to conserve. Will Travers OBE President, Species Survival Network SPECIES/PROPONENT/PROPOSALAnalysis of the ProposalsCURRENT STATUS OF SPECIES to Amend Appendices I andSSN II VIEW To be discussed at the 18th Conference of the Parties to CITES, Geneva, Switzerland, 17-28 August 2019 Prepared by the Species Survival Network Abbreviations used: RC=Resolution Conf. • CoP=Conference of the Parties • SC=Standing Committee • AC=Animals Committee PC=Plants Committee • References cited available upon request SPECIES/PROPONENT/PROPOSAL CURRENT STATUS OF SPECIES SSN VIEW Prop. 1 • Distribution: Tajikistan, Afghanistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan; proposal OPPOSE Heptner's markhor refers only to Tajikistan population. • Life history characteristics make this species highly vulnerable to over- Capra falconeri heptneri • Population: Subspecies not assessed by IUCN (2014); species, C. falco- utilization: average age at first birth 18-30 months, gestation 135-170 neri, Near Threatened (id.); C. f. heptneri: Afghanistan,10 observed in 2011; days, gives birth to 1-2 kids, lives up to 13 years. Tajikistan, 1,300 in one area and 8 in another; Turkmenistan, no recent popu- • Split-listing of species could give rise to enforcement problems and lation estimate but 303 in 2002; Uzbekistan, 313 in 2013; total population should be avoided (RC 9.24 (Rev. CoP17), Annex 3). estimated at 1,008 mature individuals in 2013 (IUCN 2014). • Threats: In Tajikistan, poaching for meat, skins, horns, illegal trophy Continues to meet criteria for Appendix I (RC 9.24 (Rev. CoP17)), hunting leading to low population of adult males, poor habitat quality due to Annex 1, paras. A and B): traded internationally . wild popu- fuel wood collection and intensive grazing. lation is small (<< 5000) . restricted area of distribution . • Trade: CITES trade data available only for C. falconeri; exports from occurrence at very few locations (majority of individuals in 2 Tajikistan (2007-2016): 8 trophies from wild source for hunting purposes. populations) . high vulnerability to intrinsic factors Tajikistan Transfer Tajikistan’s population from Appendix I to II Prop. 2 • Distribution: Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Russian Federation, Turkmenistan, SUPPORT Saiga antelope Uzbekistan; extirpated in China and Ukraine. Proposal relies on updated taxonomy recognizing only one saiga spe- Saiga tatarica • • Population: Critically Endangered (IUCN 2018); population has shown an cies (Saiga tatarica); CITES currently recognizes two species (S. tatarica observed and ongoing decline of over 80% over the last 10 years. and S. borealis, both Appendix II). Effect of proposal would be to include • Threats: Illegal hunting for horns and meat for national and interna- all saiga on Appendix I. tional trade; habitat loss; climatic events; disease. Horns are main target of • Despite voluntary bans or moratoria on hunting and international trade poaching, leading to skewed sex ratios, reproductive collapse, and popula- in all range States by 2015, international trade continues among con- tion decline. sumer non-range States, allowing the laundering of poached specimens. • Trade: Most commonly used horn products are bottled ‘fresh’ saiga water, • Singapore claims to have a large stockpile of horns (China is also shavings, bottled ‘supermarket’ saiga water and tablets; from 1995-2004, believed to have significant stockpiles, though volume is unknown); 87,449 kilograms of horn were exported to China, Singapore and Japan; in stockpiles could fuel demand. 2010-2014, 224 incidents of illegal hunting recorded in Kazakhstan, and 8,594 • High volumes of international trade in Singapore, China, Hong Kong horns were confiscated. Disease-related mortality event in 2015-16 resulted in SAR, Japan, and Malaysia. the deaths of more than two-thirds of the global population at that time. Continued Continued www.ssn.org 1 2 SPECIES/PROPONENT/PROPOSAL CURRENT STATUS OF SPECIES SSN VIEW Continued Continued Mongolia and USA Meets criteria for Appendix I (RC 9.24 (Rev. CoP17), Annex 1, Transfer from Appendix II to I para. C): traded internationally . significant population decline . fluctuations in population size . prone to large die-offs caused by disease . poached for horns and meat Prop. 3 • Distribution: Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Peru; proposal for Argentina popu- NO OPINION Vicuña lation only. Vicugna vicugna • Population: Least Concern (IUCN 2018); minimum estimated number of vicuña present in the province of Salta in 2018 is 58,387 individuals. • Threats: Poaching for the international market. • Trade: Gross exports from Argentina, 2012-2017: ~4,695 kg fibres, ~8,510 kg hair. Argentina Transfer the population of the Province of Salta (Argentina) from Appendix I to II with annotation 1 Prop. 4 • Distribution: Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Peru; proposal for Chile population SUPPORT Vicuña only. • Proposal recognizes administrative change in the name of the region in Vicugna vicugna • Population: Least Concern (IUCN 2018). Chile; it does not affect the scope of the listing. • Threats: Poaching for the international market. • Trade: Gross exports from Chile, 2012-2017: ~128 kg fibres; ~68 kg hair. Chile Continued SPECIES/PROPONENT/PROPOSAL CURRENT STATUS OF SPECIES SSN VIEW Continued Amend the name of the population of Chile from “population of Primera Region” to “populations of the region of Tarapaca and of the region of Arica and Parinacota” Prop. 5 • Distribution: Angola, Botswana, Cameroon, Central African Republic, SUPPORT Giraffe Chad, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, Kenya, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Somalia, South Africa, South Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda, • Giraffes used locally for traditional cultural purposes and bushmeat; Giraffa camelopardalis Zambia, Zimbabwe; extirpated in Eritrea, Guinea, Mauritania, Nigeria, bushmeat traded regionally; very large international trade for commer- Senegal; likely extirpated in Mali. cial purposes in bones used for carvings and gun and knife handles, skins used for numerous products (such as pillows); on average 374 • Population: Vulnerable (IUCN 2018); observed, past (and ongoing) giraffe trophies per annum are imported to the USA alone. population decline of 36-40% over 3 generations (30 years, 1985-2015); 1 population estimate is 68,293 mature individuals, declining; 5 of 9 sub- • Direct evidence of international trade in all giraffe subspecies, including species threatened: 2 Critically Endangered, 1 Endangered, 2 Vulnerable from countries where populations Critically Endangered, Endangered, Vulnerable, decreasing and/or small. (id.); populations scattered and fragmented. • Threats: Habitat loss, civil unrest, poaching, ecological changes. • Proposal supported by the 32 African countries that are members of the African Elephant Coalition.2 • Trade: From 2006-2015, 39,516 giraffe specimens imported to USA, equivalent to at least 3,751 individual giraffes, with 99.7% of specimens from wild sources; most commonly imported items were bone carv- Meets criteria for Appendix II (RC 9.24 (Rev. CoP16), Annex ings, bones, trophies, skin pieces, bone pieces, skins and jewelry; legal 2a, para. B): high level of international trade . all subspecies Central African Republic, Chad, Kenya, hunting of giraffes occurs in parts of southern Africa. affected by international trade . trade exacerbates impact of Mali, Niger and Senegal other threats . low reproductive output (generation time 10 years, 15-month gestation period, typically one calf is born) Include in Appendix II Prop. 6 • Distribution: Bangladesh, Bhutan, Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, China, SUPPORT India, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Myanmar, Nepal, Philippines, Singapore, Small-clawed otter • Trade as pets is a growing threat; popular in pet trade due to small size; Taiwan, Province of China, Thailand, Viet Nam. Aonyx cinereus highest demand in Thailand, Japan, and Indonesia.4,5,6 • Population: Vulnerable (IUCN 2015); >30% decline over past 30 years • Much trade is online for live animals from the wild; captive-bred speci- on
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Inertia in CITES Nomenclature Nomenclature
    Letter Inertia in CITES nomenclature nomenclature. African forest elephant (Loxodonta cy- clotis) has been splitted from African savannah elephant To prevent international commecial trade from (L. africana) for about 20 years (Roca et al. 2001). negatively affecting the survival of wild species, the Con- Early in 2002, the Nomenclature Committee of CITES vention on International Trade in Endangered Species of recognized that the subspecies L. africana cyclotis Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) lists roughly 35,800 species may be a full species (CITES 2002). However, forest in its appendices, which are updated at each Conference elephant is still merged as a subspecies of L. africana of the Parties (CoP). Frank and Wilcove (2019) used under CITES. Due to its slow growth rate and low pangolins (Manis spp.) to illustrate how delay in population numbers, African forest elephants are more updating CITES appendices may hinder the conservation sensitive to human-induced mortality than savanna of traded species. All 8 pangolin species have been elephants, and their populations have declined rapidly uplisted to Appendix I, and new pangolin species, once in the past decade (Poulsen et al. 2017; Turkalo et al. discovered, are listed in Appendix II. Species listings 2017). The convention and its projects, such as the in CITES appendices are determined by both threat Monitoring the Illegal Killing of Elephants (MIKE), need status and the nomenclatural system CITES uses. The to treat the forest elephant as a full species, reassess its convention adopts nomenclatural standard references populations, and reanalyze the data (Groves 2016), so for different taxa at each CoP meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Fish and Invertebrates Listed in the CITES Appendices
    JOINTS NATURE \=^ CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Checklist of fish and mvertebrates Usted in the CITES appendices JNCC REPORT (SSN0963-«OStl JOINT NATURE CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Report distribution Report Number: No. 238 Contract Number/JNCC project number: F7 1-12-332 Date received: 9 June 1995 Report tide: Checklist of fish and invertebrates listed in the CITES appendices Contract tide: Revised Checklists of CITES species database Contractor: World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 ODL Comments: A further fish and invertebrate edition in the Checklist series begun by NCC in 1979, revised and brought up to date with current CITES listings Restrictions: Distribution: JNCC report collection 2 copies Nature Conservancy Council for England, HQ, Library 1 copy Scottish Natural Heritage, HQ, Library 1 copy Countryside Council for Wales, HQ, Library 1 copy A T Smail, Copyright Libraries Agent, 100 Euston Road, London, NWl 2HQ 5 copies British Library, Legal Deposit Office, Boston Spa, Wetherby, West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ 1 copy Chadwick-Healey Ltd, Cambridge Place, Cambridge, CB2 INR 1 copy BIOSIS UK, Garforth House, 54 Michlegate, York, YOl ILF 1 copy CITES Management and Scientific Authorities of EC Member States total 30 copies CITES Authorities, UK Dependencies total 13 copies CITES Secretariat 5 copies CITES Animals Committee chairman 1 copy European Commission DG Xl/D/2 1 copy World Conservation Monitoring Centre 20 copies TRAFFIC International 5 copies Animal Quarantine Station, Heathrow 1 copy Department of the Environment (GWD) 5 copies Foreign & Commonwealth Office (ESED) 1 copy HM Customs & Excise 3 copies M Bradley Taylor (ACPO) 1 copy ^\(\\ Joint Nature Conservation Committee Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Comments
    CropLife * AMERICA * ~ March 2,2015 VIA FEDERAL E-RULEMAKING PORTAL Public Comments Processing Attn: FWS-R3-ES-2014-0056 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Headquarters MS: BPHC 5275 Leesburg Pike Falls Church, VA 22041-3803 Re: Initial Comments: 90-Day Finding on a Petition to List the Monarch Butterfly (Danaus Plexippus Plexippus) as Threatened Under the Endangered Species Act, 79 Fed. Reg. 78775 (Dec. 31, 2014) Dear Sir or Madam, CropLife America ("CropLife") is the national voice of the agricultural crop protection industry. CropLife represents companies that develop, manufacture, and distribute virtually all ofthe crop protection, pest management, and biotechnology products used by American farmers. Because these products are critical technologies for American agriculture, CropLife's members have a substantial interest in the issues presented in the 90-day finding on a petition to list as threatened the Monarch butterfly (Dana us plexippus p/exippus) made available to the publicI by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ("FWS") on December 31, 2014 pursuant to the Endangered Species Act ("ESA,,). 2 As these initial comments indicate, our organization and its members believe that the proposed listing of the Monarch butterfly under the ESA is not warranted. Estimates for Monarch populations in North America have been available for only about two decades. CropLife and its members understand that overall estimated population levels in North America have declined during that period, although the data indicate that Monarch population numbers fluctuate very widely from year-to-year.3 Indeed, just this past year, the Eastern North I See Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 90-Day Findings on Two Petitions, 79 Fed.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Species Listing Proposals for CITES Cop18
    VKM Report 2019: 11 Assessment of species listing proposals for CITES CoP18 Scientific opinion of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment Utkast_dato Scientific opinion of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (VKM) 15.03.2019 ISBN: 978-82-8259-327-4 ISSN: 2535-4019 Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (VKM) Po 4404 Nydalen N – 0403 Oslo Norway Phone: +47 21 62 28 00 Email: [email protected] vkm.no vkm.no/english Cover photo: Public domain Suggested citation: VKM, Eli. K Rueness, Maria G. Asmyhr, Hugo de Boer, Katrine Eldegard, Anders Endrestøl, Claudia Junge, Paolo Momigliano, Inger E. Måren, Martin Whiting (2019) Assessment of Species listing proposals for CITES CoP18. Opinion of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment, ISBN:978-82-8259-327-4, Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (VKM), Oslo, Norway. VKM Report 2019: 11 Utkast_dato Assessment of species listing proposals for CITES CoP18 Note that this report was finalised and submitted to the Norwegian Environment Agency on March 15, 2019. Any new data or information published after this date has not been included in the species assessments. Authors of the opinion VKM has appointed a project group consisting of four members of the VKM Panel on Alien Organisms and Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), five external experts, and one project leader from the VKM secretariat to answer the request from the Norwegian Environment Agengy. Members of the project group that contributed to the drafting of the opinion (in alphabetical order after chair of the project group): Eli K.
    [Show full text]
  • SA Spider Checklist
    REVIEW ZOOS' PRINT JOURNAL 22(2): 2551-2597 CHECKLIST OF SPIDERS (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE) OF SOUTH ASIA INCLUDING THE 2006 UPDATE OF INDIAN SPIDER CHECKLIST Manju Siliwal 1 and Sanjay Molur 2,3 1,2 Wildlife Information & Liaison Development (WILD) Society, 3 Zoo Outreach Organisation (ZOO) 29-1, Bharathi Colony, Peelamedu, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641004, India Email: 1 [email protected]; 3 [email protected] ABSTRACT Thesaurus, (Vol. 1) in 1734 (Smith, 2001). Most of the spiders After one year since publication of the Indian Checklist, this is described during the British period from South Asia were by an attempt to provide a comprehensive checklist of spiders of foreigners based on the specimens deposited in different South Asia with eight countries - Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The European Museums. Indian checklist is also updated for 2006. The South Asian While the Indian checklist (Siliwal et al., 2005) is more spider list is also compiled following The World Spider Catalog accurate, the South Asian spider checklist is not critically by Platnick and other peer-reviewed publications since the last scrutinized due to lack of complete literature, but it gives an update. In total, 2299 species of spiders in 67 families have overview of species found in various South Asian countries, been reported from South Asia. There are 39 species included in this regions checklist that are not listed in the World Catalog gives the endemism of species and forms a basis for careful of Spiders. Taxonomic verification is recommended for 51 species. and participatory work by arachnologists in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul Instituto De
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL INSTITUTO DE BIOCIÊNCIAS PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM ECOLOGIA Tese de Doutorado Dispersão, processo chave para modular a dinâmica ecológica e evolutiva de borboletas Dirleane Ottonelli Rossato Tese de Doutorado apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul como um dos pré-requisitos para obtenção do título de Doutora em Ciências – ênfase em Ecologia. Orientador: Prof. Dr. Leandro da Silva Duarte Co-orientador: Prof. Dr. Cristiano Agra Iserhard Porto Alegre, Maio de 2018. 1 Dispersão, processo chave para modular a dinâmica ecológica e evolutiva de borboletas Dirleane Ottonelli Rossato Tese de Doutorado apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul como um dos pré-requisitos para obtenção do título de Doutora em Ciências – ênfase em Ecologia. Orientador: Prof. Dr. Leandro da Silva Duarte Co-orientador: Prof. Dr. Cristiano Agra Iserhard Banca examinadora: Prof. Dra Helena Piccoli Romanowski Prof. Dr. Thales Renato O. de Freitas Dr. Lucas Jardim Data de defesa pública 28 de maio de 2018. 2 Pés, para que os quero, se tenho asas para voar? Frida Kahlo 3 AGRADECIMENTO Aos orientadores, Professor Leandro Duarte pela orientação, discussão e proposições investigativas tão interessantes envolvendo sistemas ecológicos e evolutivos complexos, Professor Cristiano pela coorientação e suporte na identificação das borboletas. Aos colaboradores de cada um dos capítulos da presente tese, vocês foram essenciais para que esta tese contemplasse diferentes aspectos das causas e efeitos do processo dispersivo de borboletas. Ao Dr. Kaminski pelos seus instigantes questionamentos e interessantes perspectivas sobre a evolução dos caracteres, além da grande colaboração em diversas discussões teóricas e filosóficas relacionadas ou não com a presente tese.
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 Compendium of Philippine Environment Statistics
    Compendium of Philippine Environment Statistics 2002 Republika ng Pilipinas PAMBANSANG LUPON SA UGNAYANG PANG-ESTADISTIKA (NATIONAL STATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD) November 2002 The Compendium of Philippine Environment Statistics (CPES) 2002 is a publication prepared by the Environment Accounts Division of the Economic Statistics Office of the NATIONAL STATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD (NSCB). For technical inquiries, please direct calls at: (632) 899-3444. Please direct your subscription and inquiries to the: NATIONAL STATISTICAL INFORMATION CENTER National Statistical Coordination Board Ground Floor Midland Buendia Bldg., 403 Sen. Gil J. Puyat Avenue, Makati City Tel nos.: Telefax nos.: (632) 895-2767 (632) 890-8456 (632) 890-9405 e-mail address: [email protected] ([email protected]) ([email protected]) website: http://www.nscb.gov.ph The NSIC is a one-stop shop of statistical information and services in the Philippines. Compendium of Philippine Environment Statistics 2002 November 2002 Republika ng Pilipinas PAMBANSANG LUPON SA UGNAYANG PANG-ESTADISTIKA (NATIONAL STATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD) FOREWORD This is the second edition of the Compendium of Philippine Environment Statistics. The compendium is a compilation of statistical information collected from data produced by various government agencies and from data available in different statistical publications. The compilation of statistical data in this compendium is based on the Philippine Framework of Environment Statistics (PFDES) which in turn is based on the United Nations Framework for the Development of Environment Statistics. It covers data for the period 1992 to 2000, whenever possible. Latest figures presented vary depending on the availability of data. The PFDES provides a systematic approach to the development of environment statistics and is an instrument for compiling and integrating data coming from various data collecting institutions to make them more useful in the formulation and evaluation of socio-economic and environmental programs and policies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservation Status of Biological Resources in the Philippines
    : -.^,rhr:"-i-3'^^=£#?^-j^.r-^a^ Sj2 r:iw0,">::^^'^ \^^' Cfl|*ti-»;;^ THE CONSERVATION STATUS OF BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES IN THE PHILIPPINES A RRF'OHT V^Y THK lUCN CONSKRVATION MONITORING CENT:-!E PfcparGd by Roger Cox for the lnLf5rnaLion?.l InsLituLo Cor Knvironment and Development (IIED) February 1988 / fgrMsa^jnt-^'-agyga-- •r-r- ;.«-'> t ^-' isr* 1*.- i^^s. , r^^, ^».|;; ^b-^ ^.*%-^ *i,r^-v . iinnc [ '»/' C'A'. aSM!': Vi - '«.;s^ ; a-* f%h '3;riti7;.:- n'^'ji K ;ii;!'r ' <s:ii.uiy.. viii. K A xo.^ jf^'r;.' 3 10 ciJuJi i\ Ji\{ :::) Jnj:kf- .i. n ( im'.i) •V'lt r'v - -V.-^f~^?fl LP-ife- f^^ s.:.... --11 -^M.jj^^^ riB CC./Sfc^RvAriON .<*TC.rj^. OF EI3U:i' "I.VJ, JbO'TSOURCES ^^a THE PHILIPPlVl'fC ;j^...^..-r'^^ I ilRPOHT BY THK ILCJJ CGJJSIiKVA'ilCN M0N:.V:..):;1NG CKNT ^ Pc'jpas-fjr' ')y Roto* C(/X for the TiKD). {'obruary 1988 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from UNEP-WCIVIC, Cambridge http://www.archive.org/details/conservationstat88coxr . 7' CONTENTS List of Figures, Appendices and Tables iii Summary iy Acknowledgements vii 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Objectives 3 2 METHODS 4 3. FLORA, VEGETATION AND FOREST COVER 3.1 Description of the natural vegetation 4 3.1.1 The forests 4 3.1.2 Other vegetation types 7 3 2 Conservation status of the Philippine flora 8 3.2.1 Introduction 8 3.2.2 Causes of habitat destruction 9 3.2.3 Threatened plant species 11 3. 2. A Centres of plant diversity and endemism 12 4 COASTAL AND MARINE ECOSYSTEMS 4.1 Background 17 4.2 Mangroves 18 4.3 Coral reefs 19 4.4 Seagrass beds 22 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Itapeti E O Seu Entorno
    Em razão de sua importância eco- nômica e social para o município de Mogi das Cruzes e do alto grau de degradação que a Serra apre- senta, vários profi ssionais ao longo dos últimos dez anos, trabalharam de forma sistemática para a produ- ção de conhecimentos sobre a sua ocupação, seus aspectos sociais e biológicos. Assim, os capítulos contidos nesse livro representam a compilação de todas as informa- ções com embasamento científi co, de forma a levar o leitor a enten- der um pouco sobre o passado e o presente da Serra do Itapeti e o seu entorno. Itapeti do Serra Serra do VITOR FERNANDES OLIVEIRA DE MIRANDA MARIA SANTINA DE CASTRO MORINI Itapeti Aspectos Históricos, Sociais e Naturalísticos MARIA SANTINA DE CASTRO MORINI VITOR FERNANDES OLIVEIRA DE MIRANDA Serra do Itapeti Aspectos Históricos, Sociais e Naturalísticos Organizadores MARIA SANTINA DE CASTRO MORINI VITOR FERNANDES OLIVEIRA DE MIRANDA 1ª Edição 2012 Rua Machado de Assis, 10-35 Vila América • CEP 17014-038 • Bauru, SP Fone (14) 3313-7968 • www.canal6editora.com.br S4871 Serra do Itapeti: Aspectos Históricos, Sociais e Naturalísticos / Maria Santina de Castro Morini e Vitor Fernandes Oliveira de Miranda (organizadores). - - Bauru, SP: Canal 6, 2012. 400 p. ; 29 cm. ISBN 978-85-7917-174-1 1. Serra do Itapeti. 2. Mata Atlântica. I. Morini, Maria Santina de Castro. II. Miranda, Vitor Fernandes Oliveira de. III. Título. CDD: 577.34 Copyright© Canal6, 2012 Impressão e Acabamento: Av. Dr. Pedro Camarinha, 31 - Santa Cruz do Rio Pardo-SP - T: (14) 3332.1155 - www.graficaviena.com.br PRESERVE A IMPRESSO EM NATUREZA PAPEL RECICLÁVEL Este livro é dedicado ..
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Growth and Synthetic Fabrication of Structurally Colored Materials
    Biological growth and synthetic fabrication of structurally colored materials The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation McDougal, Anthony et al. "Biological growth and synthetic fabrication of structurally colored materials." Journal of Optics 21, 7 (June 2019): 073001 © 2019 IOP Publishing Ltd As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2040-8986/aaff39 Publisher IOP Publishing Version Final published version Citable link https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/126616 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 unported license Detailed Terms https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Journal of Optics TOPICAL REVIEW • OPEN ACCESS Recent citations Biological growth and synthetic fabrication of - Stability and Selective Vapor Sensing of Structurally Colored Lepidopteran Wings structurally colored materials Under Humid Conditions Gábor Piszter et al To cite this article: Anthony McDougal et al 2019 J. Opt. 21 073001 - Iridescence and thermal properties of Urosaurus ornatus lizard skin described by a model of coupled photonic structures José G Murillo et al - Biological Material Interfaces as Inspiration View the article online for updates and enhancements. for Mechanical and Optical Material Designs Jing Ren et al This content was downloaded from IP address 137.83.219.59 on 29/07/2020 at 14:27 Journal of Optics J. Opt. 21 (2019) 073001 (51pp) https://doi.org/10.1088/2040-8986/aaff39 Topical Review Biological growth and synthetic fabrication of structurally colored materials Anthony McDougal , Benjamin Miller, Meera Singh and Mathias Kolle Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States of America E-mail: [email protected] Received 9 January 2018, revised 29 May 2018 Accepted for publication 16 January 2019 Published 11 June 2019 Abstract Nature’s light manipulation strategies—in particular those at the origin of bright iridescent colors —have fascinated humans for centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • 990 PART 23—ENDANGERED SPECIES CONVENTION Subpart A—Introduction
    Pt. 23 50 CFR Ch. I (10–1–01 Edition) Service agent, or other game law en- 23.36 Schedule of public meetings and no- forcement officer free and unrestricted tices. access over the premises on which such 23.37 Federal agency consultation. operations have been or are being con- 23.38 Modifications of procedures and nego- ducted; and shall furnish promptly to tiating positions. such officer whatever information he 23.39 Notice of availability of official re- may require concerning such oper- port. ations. Subpart E—Scientific Authority Advice (c) The authority to take golden ea- [Reserved] gles under a depredations control order issued pursuant to this subpart D only Subpart F—Export of Certain Species authorizes the taking of golden eagles when necessary to seasonally protect 23.51 American ginseng (Panax domesticated flocks and herds, and all quinquefolius). such birds taken must be reported and 23.52 Bobcat (Lynx rufus). turned over to a local Bureau Agent. 23.53 River otter (Lontra canadensis). 23.54 Lynx (Lynx canadensis). 23.55 Gray wolf (Canis lupus). PART 23—ENDANGERED SPECIES 23.56 Brown bear (Ursus arctos). CONVENTION 23.57 American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis). Subpart A—Introduction AUTHORITY: Convention on International Sec. Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna 23.1 Purpose of regulations. and Flora, 27 U.S.T. 1087; and Endangered 23.2 Scope of regulations. Species Act of 1973, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 23.3 Definitions. 1531 et seq. 23.4 Parties to the Convention. SOURCE: 42 FR 10465, Feb. 22, 1977, unless Subpart B—Prohibitions, Permits and otherwise noted.
    [Show full text]
  • INSECTS and Other Terrestrial Arthropods
    Expedition Field Techniques INSECTS and other terrestrial arthropods by George C McGavin Published by Geography Outdoors: the centre supporting field research, exploration and outdoor learning Royal Geographical Society with IBG 1 Kensington Gore London SW7 2AR T: 020 7591 3030 F: 020 7591 3031 E: [email protected] W: www.rgs.org/go December 1997 Reprinted 2007 ISBN 0-907649-74-2 Insects 1 Expedition Field Techniques INSECTS and other terrestrial arthropods CONTENTS Introduction Section One: Planning and Preparation Section Two: Safety in the Field Section Three: Conservation Section Four: Collecting Insects 4.1 hand searching techniques 4.2 butterfly and aerial nets 4.3 sweep nets 4.4 beating trays 4.5 light traps 4.6 flight intercept traps 4.7 pitfall traps 4.8 emergence traps 4.9 water pan traps 4.10 lures and baited traps 4.11 suction sampling 4.12 extraction techniques 4.13 aquatic sampling techniques 4.14 taxa-specific techniques 4.15 canopy techniques 4.16 collecting in caves 4.17 collecting from live animals 4.18 making your own equipment 4.19 data recording Section Five: Killing Methods 2 Expedition Field Techniques Section Six: Specimen Preservation 6.1 field preservation 6.2 long term preservation 6.3 posting material Section Seven: Specimen Identification Section Eight: Epilogue Section Nine: Equipment Suppliers Section Ten: Sources of Information Section Eleven: References Insects 3 Acknowledgements I am very grateful to many friends and colleagues for all manner of useful advice and discussions. They are listed below in alphabetical order; Mark Collins, Jon Davies, Bob George, Clive Hambler, Peter Hammond, Ivor Lansbury, Darren Mann, Chris O’Toole, Adrian Pont, Jim Reynolds, Gaden Robinson, Tony Russell-Smith, Malcolm Scoble, Steve Simpson, David Spencer Smith, Phil Taylor, Mike Wilson, Shane Winser.
    [Show full text]