Binkley® Series by Cush RFQ Guide Rev 0, Jan 2017 Fixed Frame Mechanical Suspension

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Binkley® Series by Cush RFQ Guide Rev 0, Jan 2017 Fixed Frame Mechanical Suspension Binkley® Series by Cush RFQ Guide Rev 0, Jan 2017 Fixed Frame Mechanical Suspension Numerous configurations and mounting styles require us to offer this order guide for our Cush Binkley® Series fixed frame models. Please refer to Cush model drawings for installation notes, configuration, and service parts. Cush® can make a custom configuration for you if not shown in this guide. Binkley® Mechanical Suspension Features Industry standard “Will Fit” service parts. Replaceable wear pads in hangers for prolonged service life. Eccentric axle alignment replaces service laden adjustable torque arms. Cush Shear-Tite™ torque control fasteners at torque arms & rockers ease installation & service. Binkley® Series has optimized fabrications made from 80KSI steel for durability and light weight. Binkley® RideMax™ for the industries best ride quality in the market! (patent pending) Model Type Binkley® with Standard Torque Rod Arms Standard Torque Arms & Leaf Springs Standard Torque Arms & LightFlex Springs (Model BMS) (Model BMF) Rev 0, 12-2016 Binkley® RideMax™ with Big Bush Torque Rod Arms (Patent Pending) Uses industry standard big diameter narrow bushing from Air Ride Suspension Market. RideMax™ Torque Arms RideMax ™ Torque Arms & Std Steel Leaf Springs & LightFlex Springs (Model BRS) (Model BRF) Binkley® RideMax™ with Front Air Lift (Patent Pending) P/N Cush® Binkley® Series Model Type BMS = Binkley Mechanical Standard Steel Springs BMF = Binkley Mechanical LiteFlex Springs BRS = Binkley RideMax Standard Steel Springs BRF = Binkley RideMax LiteFlex Springs BRL = Binkley RideMax front Lift pg. 2 Suspension Duty & Application Your trailer application may be for mostly On-Highway or may be more heavy duty requiring a suspension for Off-Highway durability. The Binkley® series is rated up to 25,000 lbs. GAWR with proper springs, axles, and brake selection. o The Binkley® Standard (S) model is designed to be an industry leader for On-Highway applications: durable, light weight, with value added features and options: Container Chassis, Gravel, Dump, Belly Dump, Rear Dump, Livestock, Grain, Platform, Van, Lt Wt Utility, Tag & Pindle. o The Binkley® Heavy Duty (H) model is designed with thicker gage hangers and parts to be an industry leader for Off-Highway applications: Lowboy, Oil-Field, Logging, Tanker, Chip Van, HD Drop-deck & Flatbed. P/N Suspension Duty (Up to 25K with proper spring selection) S = Binkley Standard, Mostly On-Highway (Features light weight front and rear hangers, replaceable hanger wear pads.) H = Binkley HD, Off-Highway (Features heavy duty hangers, replaceable hanger wear pads.) Axle Quantity Your trailer application may require a single or multiple axle configuration. To reconfigure from a single or tandem kit an expansion Multiple Axle Configurator (MAC) kit can be added. P/N Axle Quantity 1 = Single Axle Configuration 2 = Tandem Axle Configuration 3 = Tri-Axle Axle Configuration 4 = MAC Kit (Axle add-on kit) pg. 3 Axle Spacing Your trailer application will determine the axle spacing needed. The standard axle spacing is 49”, axle spacing wider than 49” will require a special length rocker or custom configuration. P/N Axle Spacing A = Single Axle Standard Setting C = 42.5" Axle Centers (12K Lt Wt Special Spring) E = 49" Axle Centers (11.75” long rocker) SHOWN H = 54.5" Axle Centers (17.25” long rocker) J = 60" Axle Centers (22.75” long rocker) Axle Connection Configuration Your trailer application will often determine what height of suspension you need to fit between the bottom of the trailer frame and the center of the axle (Suspension RIDE HEIGHT, RH). The suspension Ride Height required will then determine if your application is tall or short application. A tall application will require an Overslung, or TopMount type typically used on Flatbed or Van trailers. A short application will require an Underslung, or Low-Mount type typically used on Drop-Deck or Lowboy trailers. The axle connection brackets are also dependent on the size of the axle. A standard axle is 5.0” round diameter and a light weight axle can be 5.75” or 6.0” round diameter with a thinner wall to reduce weight at the same strength as a 5.0” round. Overslung Axle Connection Underslung Axle Connection “No Catch” bottom spring seat protects u-bolts better than others and increases under ground clearance. Axle Axle Connection P/N Size U-Bolts 1 Top Mount 5.0" Rd 3/4" 4 Under Slung 5.0" Rd 7/8" Top Mount 5.75" Rd 5 3/4" pg. 4 6 Top Mount 6.0" Rd 3/4" Hanger Styles Your trailer frame design will determine what style of frame hanger will fit up best for your trailer type & application. These hangers are offered in both the Binkley® S and the Binkley® HD style units. (U) UnderMount, No Top Plate (S) UnderMount, Straddle-Mount Tapered Top Hanger for 4” I-Beam For 4” Tube P/N Hanger Reference Style Trailer Type & Hanger Style U = Under Mount Narrow, No Top Plate I-Beam Frame T = Under Mount with Top Plates I-Beam or Tube Frame S = 4" Wide Straddle Mount Tube or G-rail Frame W = Under Mount Narrow, Winged no Tops I-Beam or Slider Frame F = Flange Mount Weldon Tank Trailer Frame B = Flange Mount Bolton Aluminum Trailer Frame X = Other T.B.D. in Spec Notes 0 = None / Completion Kit pg. 5 Spring Seat Height Your trailer frame design will determine what system Ride Height is needed. Per your spring choice the spring seat height (SS) will be shown in the chart for the desired ride height. The spring seat connects the axle to the springs and the suspension torque arms. Spring seats need to be chosen for ride height and axle diameter fit-up. A standard axle is 5.0” round diameter and a light weight axle can be 5.75” or 6.0” round diameter with a thinner wall to reduce weight at the same strength as a 5.0” round. Below is a chart showing the alpha ID letter for each type of seat. (Spring seat example) P/N Alpha ID for Spring Seat Height (SS) / Axle Diameter Size Std Axle Diameter = 5" Rd Big Diameter Axle = 5.75"Rd Special Order Meritor 6" Rd 0 = None 0 = None 0 = None A = 3/4" J = 3/8" R = 1/4" B = 1-1/4" K = 7/8" S= 3/4" C = 1-3/4" L = 1-3/8" T = 1-1/4" D = 2-1/4" M = 1-7/8" U = 1-3/4" E = 2-3/4" N = 2-3/8" V = 2-1/4" F = 3-1/4" O = 2-7/8" W = 2-3/4" G = 3-3/4" P = 3-3/8" X = 3-1/4" H = 4-1/4" Q = 3-7/8" Y = 3-3/4" pg. 6 Spring Choice Customers can get their Cush Binkley® Series leaf springs from us or source them internally. There are several springs to choose from for desired capacity and ride quality. Please review your ride height and spring requirements. Customers can provide their own leaf springs but we need to know what spring is being used so that we can verify the application use. P/N Cush Springs or Customer Supplied N = Without Springs, Customer Supplied C = Leaf Springs Supplied by Cush P/N Binkley® 3" Wide Leaf Spring Selection Chart GAWR SPRING SPRING SPRING ARCH Length Axle Spring (lbs.) Spring Axle Height Cush P/N Ref No. ARCH (in) ID Capacity Type (in) Spacing A SP0365 TRA-2740 25,000 Three Leaf HD High 5.8 43.7 49" & up 25K Duty Heavy B SP0365-01 TRA-2741 25,000 Three Leaf HD Low 3.3 43.8 49" & up C SP0354 TRA-2726 22,400 Three Leaf High 6.3 43.7 49" & up D SP0355 TRA-2727 22,400 Three Leaf Medium 4.9 43.8 49" & up E SP0356 TRA-2728 22,400 Three Leaf Low 3.8 43.8 49" & up F SP0324 TRA-2752 22,400 Two Leaf High 7.1 43.5 49" & up G SP0325 TRA-2753 22,400 Two Leaf Medium 5.8 43.1 49" & up H SP0326 TRA-2754 22,400 Two Leaf Low 4.4 43.7 49" & up 23K Standard 23KDuty Standard I SP0360 TRA-023 22,400 Single Leaf High 7.4 46 49" & up J SP0363 TRA-021 22,400 Single Leaf Low 4.9 43.9 49" & up K SP24784-01 TRA-2770 15,000 Three Leaf LD High 6.3 43.8 49" & up Duty Light L SP27266-01 TRA-2771 12,000 Three Leaf LD High 6.2 36.3 42.5" LiteFlex SP10996 Medium 5.2 43.5 ngs M 10996 25,000 W/Bumper 49" & up (for 5.75" OD axle Only) LiteFlex SP11173 Medium 5.2 43.5 N 11173 25,000 W/Bumper 49" & up Light WeightLight LiteFlex O SP16316-01 Medium 5.2 43.5 Composite Spri 16316-01 25,000 Single 49" & up pg. 7 Overslung Spring Choice per Application & Mounting Height (MH) Customers can get their Cush Binkley® Series with different leaf spring choices. Please review your ride height and spring requirements. P/N for Overslung Mounting Height (Ride Height) Chart per Spring & Seat Height. OVERSLUNG SPRING SEAT HEIGHT "SS" (FOR 5.0" ROUND AXLE) GAWR LEAF ( A ) ( B ) ( C ) ( D ) ( E ) ( F ) ( G ) ( H ) <-5.0" Rd SEAT ID Capacity SPRING 0.75 1.25 1.75 2.25 2.75 3.25 3.75 4.25 <-SEAT HT (INCHES) PART <-5"Rd AXLE SEAT PART (lbs.) SP0142-01 SP0142-02 SP0142-03 SP0149-04 SP0149-05 SP0149-06 SP0149-07 SP0149-08 NUMBER NUMBER 3-LEAF HD SP0074-K SP0074-L SP0074-M SP0074-P SP0074-R SP0074-S SP0074-T SP0074-U <-3" SQ.
Recommended publications
  • Sp057 Leaf Spring Installation
    SP057 LEAF SPRING INSTALLATION Also covering Part #RH015 1967-1969 CAMARO AND FIREBIRD NOTE: This part number is designed to use the original mounting hardware from a factory multi-leaf rear end setup. If you have a factory mono-leaf rear end or wish to upgrade the hardware for your multi-leaf setup, you can purchase the BMR leaf spring installation kit (Part #RH015). This kit includes new front mounting hardware, polyurethane leaf spring pads, larger U-bolts, and a heavy duty rear shackle kit with polyurethane frame bushings. INSTALLATION: 1. Lift vehicle and support with jack stands under the frame rails. 2. Remove the lower shock bolts. 3. Loosen the (4) nuts on the shock mounting plates then remove the plates. 4. Place a hydraulic jack under the axle. Lift the axle off the springs. 5. Loosen the nut on the rear lower shackle plates but do not remove the bolt. 6. Loosen the (3) bolts on the front leaf spring pocket and also remove the rear leaf spring bolt then remove the leaf spring from the vehicle. 7. If the vehicle was originally equipped with mono-leaf springs, knock out the factory bolts from the leaf spring axle mount (4 per side). Using a ½” drill bit, drill out the 4 holes in the leaf spring axle mounts. Also drill out the holes in the shock mounts to allow the use of ½” U-bolts. (IMAGE 1) 8. If you also purchased the leaf spring installation kit (RH015), replace the nut clips in the frame at this time. 9. If you purchased the leaf spring installation kit, knock out the upper bushings in the frame and install the supplied polyurethane bushings and inner steel sleeves.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaption and Evaluation of Transversal Leaf Spring Suspension Design for a Lightweight Vehicle Using Adams /C Ar
    ADAPTION AND EVALUATION OF TRANSVERSAL LEAF SPRING SUSPENSION DESIGN FOR A LIGHTWEIGHT VEHICLE USING ADAMS /C AR FLORIAN CHRIST Master Thesis in Vehicle Engineering Vehicle Dynamics Aeronautical and Vehicle Engineering Royal Institute of Technology TRITA-AVE 2015:09 ISSN 1651-7660 Adaption and Evaluation of Transversal Leaf Spring Suspension Design for a Lightweight Vehicle using Adams/Car FLORIAN CHRIST © Florian Christ, 2015. Vehicle Dynamics Department of Aeronautical and Vehicle Engineering Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan SE-100 44 Stockholm Sweden ii Abstract This investigation deals with the suspension of a lightweight medium-class vehicle for four passengers with a curb weight of 1000 kg. The suspension layout consists of a transversal leaf spring and is supported by an active air spring which is included in the damper. The lower control arms are replaced by the leaf spring ends. Active ride height control is introduced to compensate for different vehicle load states. Active steering is applied using electric linear actuators with steer-by wire design. Besides intense use of light material the inquiry should investigate whether elimination of suspension parts or a lighter component is concordant with the stability demands of the vehicle. The investigation is based on simulations obtained with MSC Software ADAMS/Car and Matlab. The suspension is modeled in Adams/Car and has to proof it's compliance in normal driving conditions and under extreme forces. Evaluation criteria are suspension kinematics and compliance such as camber, caster and toe change during wheel travel in different load states. Also the leaf spring deflection, anti-dive and anti-squat measures and brake force distribution are investigated.
    [Show full text]
  • Mini-Tub Leaf-Spring Rear Suspension for 1964-70 Mustangs
    CLICK for More Info Online Mini-Tub Leaf-Spring Rear Suspension for 1964-70 Mustangs • Additional 2-3/4” tire clearance • Stronger offset frame rail inserts • Adjustable suspension geometry • Choose spring rate and ride height Mini-Tub Leaf-Spring Rear Suspension The mini-tub leaf-spring suspension from Total Control Products Applications allows substantially greater clearance for extremely large tire and wheel Mustang 64-70 combinations. Relocated shocks and springs combined with the additional mini-tub clearance allow 2-3/4” more tire clearance on each side of the vehicle. Systems include all mounts, offset frame rail inserts, leaf springs, spring plates and shock absorbers. A panhard bar version of the suspension is also offered for sharper and more predictable handling. Optional components include a narrow- width, adjustable-rate anti-roll bar and fabricated Ford 9” housing (FAB9™). Currently available for all styles of 1964-70 Mustangs. NOTE: ‘65-66 GT rear valance is not compatible with suspension. 1 Rear Spring Mounts Offset Frame Rail Insert Front Spring Mounts Relocated mount with 2-3/4” additional tire Welds inboard of OEM supporting crossmember clearance per side frame rail Panhard Bar System Upper Shock Mounts Lateral locating device Relocates stem-mount for rear end housing style shock inboard of OEM position Anti-Roll Bar FAB9 Rear End Houisng Splined arms with Fabricated Ford 9” adjustable end-link housing, structurally positions to alter rate superior to OEM 2 Mini-Tub Leaf-Spring Suspension Shown with optional Anti-Roll
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of the Suspension for an Off-Road Vehicle
    International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 07 Issue: 05 | May 2020 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 A Comparative study of the Suspension for an Off-Road Vehicle Sivadanus.S Department of Manufacturing Engineering, College of Engineering – Guindy, Chennai ---------------------------------------------------------------------***--------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract - Humans use different vehicles to travel in is set nothing can be adjusted or moved. This type of different terrains for comfort and ease of travel. An off-terrain suspension will not be considered in the scope of this project vehicle is generally used for rugged terrain and needs a largely due to its lack of adjustability. completely different dynamics in suspension comparison to an on-road vehicle. The aim of this project is to identify and Independent suspension systems provide more effective determine the parameters of vehicle dynamics with a proper functionality in traction and stability for off-roading study of suspension and to initiate a comparative study for an applications. Independent suspension systems provide flex off-road vehicle using different models. (the ability for one wheel to move vertically while still Key Words: Suspension, Vehicle Dynamics, Off-road allowing the other wheels to stay in contact with the Vehicle, Control arms, Camber surface). 1.INTRODUCTION There are many different versions and variations of independent suspensions, which include swing axle Suspension suspensions, transverse leaf spring suspensions, trailing and The role of a suspension system within a vehicle is to ensure semi-trailing suspensions, Macpherson strut suspensions, that contact between the tires and driving surface is and double wishbone suspensions. Control arms are used for continuously maintained.
    [Show full text]
  • Specifiers & Installers Guide to TORSION BAR APPLICATIONS
    Specifiers & Installers Guide To TORSION BAR APPLICATIONS WELCOME Thank you for specifying Sauber Torsion Bars. By choosing us as your stability partner, you derive the following benefits: * Improved Stability * Stability is safety, and safety is our first concern. A Sauber Torsion Bar can eliminate unwanted counterweight, offering your users an extra safety margin. Because Sauber bars don't rigidize the chassis frame, they always provide a smooth, quiet ride. * Long Life * Premium bronze and galvanized components. Bushings guaranteed and replaced as/if needed for 10 years. 10 Year parts coverage when inspected at no greater than four month intervals. * Excellent Documentation * Our comprehensive applications charts, installation instructions and detailed drawings provide the vital information you and your installers need in an organized format. * Superior Support * Toll-free phone and fax service from anywhere in North America provides easy access to the resources of our organization through your personal company representative. * Lower Life Cycle Costs * Since it takes less time to mount our bar, its installed cost can actually be less than other alternatives. Sauber Torsion Bars are designed and built to last as long as your chassis. * Extensive Inventory * Our inventory power puts our bar on the floor just when you want it. Your production schedule can't wait on your suppliers, and with us as your partner, it won't. * More Choices * Underframe or overframe, nobody provides more installation options than we do. More choices mean a better
    [Show full text]
  • Modelling Commercial Vehicle Handling and Rolling Stability
    357 CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Bradford Scholars Modelling commercial vehicle handling and rolling stability K HussainÃ, W Stein, and A J Day School of Engineering, Design, and Technology, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK The manuscript was received on 3 September 2004 and was accepted after revision for publication on 28 April 2005. DOI: 10.1243/146441905X48707 Abstract: This paper presents a multi-degrees-of-freedom non-linear multibody dynamic model of a three-axle heavy commercial vehicle tractor unit, comprising a subchassis, front and rear leaf spring suspensions, steering system, and ten wheels/tyres, with a semi-trailer comprising two axles and eight wheels/tyres. The investigation is mainly concerned with the rollover stability of the articulated vehicle. The models incorporate all sources of compliance, stiffness, and damping, all with non-linear characteristics, and are constructed and simulated using automatic dynamic analysis of mechanical systems formulation. A constant radius turn test and a single lane change test (according to the ISO Standard) are simulated. The constant radius turn test shows the understeer behaviour of the vehicle, and the single lane change manoeuvre was conducted to show the transient behaviour of the vehicle. Non-stable roll and yaw behaviour of the vehicle is predicted at test speeds .90 km/h. Rollover stability of the vehicle is also investigated using a constant radius turn test with increasing speed. The articulated laden vehicle model predicted increased understeer behaviour, due to higher load acting on the wheels of the middle and rear axles of the tractor and the influence of the semi-trailer, as shown by the reduced yaw rate and the steering angle variation during the con- stant radius turn.
    [Show full text]
  • Roadmaster, Experts in Dinghy Towing, Introduces the Comfort Ride Slipper Leaf Spring and Shock Absorber Systems to Road-Weary Trailer and Fifth-Wheel Owners
    article and photos by Bob Livingston SUSPENSION NIRVANA Roadmaster, experts in dinghy towing, introduces the Comfort Ride Slipper Leaf Spring and Shock Absorber systems to road-weary trailer and fifth-wheel owners railers and fifth-wheels take a lot of punishment a company immersed in the tow-bar business, catering on the road. Suspensions, designed to counter this to owners towing vehicles behind their motorhomes, has Tabuse, have not changed much over the years, and expanded its offerings in the towable arena with the intro- in most cases are the same ones found on chassis that date duction of the Comfort Ride Slipper Leaf Spring Suspension back a very long time. (The old line “This isn’t your grand- and Shock Absorber systems. father’s vehicle” does not apply.) While stock suspensions The concept is simple, and the result is a game changer hold the chassis off the ground, controlling the ride is not in the way trailers and fifth-wheels handle all road conditions. a strong attribute. One might ask, “Why worry about ride quality inside Leaf springs tied to shackles and a center-mounted a trailer when towing since no one is back there to feel equalizer are supposed to counter the bumps in the road the shakes, rattles and rolls? That’s a valid question, but but, with few exceptions, are not very effective. Roadmaster, subjecting a trailer to a constant 4.0-magnitude earthquake 74 TRAILER LIFE July 2018 Roadmaster’s Comfort Ride Slipper Leaf Spring and Shock Absorber systems bolt on to the frame with only minor drilling needed to mount the center box.
    [Show full text]
  • Ride Control Defined
    RIDE CONTROL DEFINED According to Newton's First Law, a moving body will continue moving in a straight line until it is acted upon by another force. Newton's Second Law states that for each action there is an equal and opposite reaction. In the case of the automobile, whether the disturbing force is in the form of a wind-gust, an incline in the roadway, or the cornering forces produced by tires, the force causing the action and the force resisting the action will always be in balance. Many things affect vehicles in motion. Weight distribution, speed, road conditions and wind are some factors that affect how vehicles travel down the highway. Under all these variables however, the vehicle suspension system including the shocks, struts and springs must be in good condition. Worn suspension components may reduce the stability of the vehicle and reduce driver control. They may also accelerate wear on other suspension components. Replacing worn or inadequate shocks and struts will help maintain good ride control as they: Control spring and suspension movement Provide consistent handling and braking Prevent premature tire wear Help keep the tires in contact with the road Maintain dynamic wheel alignment Control vehicle bounce, roll, sway, dive and acceleration squat Reduce wear on other vehicle systems Promote even and balanced tire and brake wear Reduce driver fatigue Suspension concepts and components have changed and will continue to change dramatically, but the basic objective remains the same: 1. Provide steering stability with good handling characteristics 2. Maximize passenger comfort Achieving these objectives under all variables of a vehicle in motion is called ride control 1 BASIC TERMINOLOGY To begin this training program, you need to possess some very basic information.
    [Show full text]
  • Rollover of Heavy Commercial Vehicles
    Rollover of Heavy Commercial Vehicles - UMTRI-99- 19 August, 1999 C. B. Winkler R. D. Ervin The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute 2901 Baxter Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48 109 for Volvo Truck Corporation, AB Goteborg, Sweden and the Great Lakes Center for Truck and Transit Research Ann Arbor, Michigan Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Reciplent's Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date August, 1999 Rollover of Heavy Commercial Vehicles 6. Performing Organization Code 8. Performing Organlzatlon Report Nio. 7. Author@) Winkler, C. B.; Ervin, R.D. - 9. Performing Organlzation Name and Address 1 10. work unit NO. (TRAIS) The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute 11. Contract or Grant NO. 2901 Baxter Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2150 13. Type of Report and Perlod Coverejd - 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Final Report Volvo Truck Corporation, 1B Great lakes Center for Truck and Transit Research 14. Sponsoring Agency Code I 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract The state-of-the-art understanding of rollover of the commercial vehicle is reviewed. Accident statistics are presented which highlight the severity and lethal nature of rollover crashes. Physical and statistical evidlence for the linkage between vehicle roll stability and the actual occurrence of rollover accidents is presented. The fundamentals of static roll stability are described in detail and then enhanced with discussion of dynamilc considerations of the rollover process. The text concludes with a discussion of the evolving use of intelligent electronic systems and active vehicle control for reducing the occurrence of rollover.
    [Show full text]
  • Transverse Leaf Springs: a Corvette Controversy
    Transverse Leaf Springs: A Corvette Controversy By Matt Miller Introduction A lot of people give Corvettes flack because they employ leaf springs. The mere mention of leaf springs conjures up images of suspensions on horse-drawn buggies, old cars and trucks, and Harbor Freight utility trailers. Even magazine reviews of the latest Corvettes talk about how “antiquated” their leaf spring designs are, and many a Corvette enthusiast has converted his car to aftermarket coilovers in the belief that they are inherently better than the composite transverse leaf springs found on the front and rear suspensions of all Corvettes since 1984. But is that true? Does the Corvette’s use of transverse leaf springs mean it has an inferior, outdated suspension design? The short answer is “No!” To find out why, we’ll cover some basics on springs and suspensions and see how the facts add up. Page 1 What is a Spring, Anyway? We all intuitively know what springs are. But technically speaking, a spring is an elastic mechanical device that stores potential energy. When mechanical energy is put into a spring, it deforms and can release that energy back in the opposite direction. We measure a spring’s energy storage by its “spring rate,” which defines its energy storage. The spring rate defines the increase in force required to move the spring a certain amount. For example, if a spring has a rate of 100 lb/in (pounds per inch), it means that 100 lbs of force will move one end of it 1”, an additional 100 lbs will move it another inch, and so on.
    [Show full text]
  • Truck Handling Stability Simulation and Comparison of Taper-Leaf and Multi-Leaf Spring Suspensions with the Same Vertical Stiffness
    applied sciences Article Truck Handling Stability Simulation and Comparison of Taper-Leaf and Multi-Leaf Spring Suspensions with the Same Vertical Stiffness Leilei Zhao 1, Yunshan Zhang 2, Yuewei Yu 1,*, Changcheng Zhou 1,*, Xiaohan Li 1 and Hongyan Li 3 1 School of Transportation and Vehicle Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China; [email protected] (L.Z.); [email protected] (X.L.) 2 Shandong Automobile Spring Factory Zibo Co.,Ltd., Zibo 255000, China; [email protected] 3 State Key Laboratory of Automotive Simulation and Control, Jilin University, Changchun 130022, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (Y.Y.); [email protected] (C.Z.); Tel.: +86-135-7338-7800 (C.Z.) Received: 16 December 2019; Accepted: 31 January 2020; Published: 14 February 2020 Abstract: The lightweight design of trucks is of great importance to enhance the load capacity and reduce the production cost. As a result, the taper-leaf spring will gradually replace the multi-leaf spring to become the main elastic element of the suspension for trucks. To reveal the changes of the handling stability after the replacement, the simulations and comparison of the taper-leaf and the multi-leaf spring suspensions with the same vertical stiffness for trucks were conducted. Firstly, to ensure the same comfort of the truck before and after the replacement, an analytical method of replacing the multi-leaf spring with the taper-leaf spring was proposed. Secondly, the effectiveness of the method was verified by the stiffness tests based on a case study. Thirdly, the dynamic models of the taper-leaf spring and the multi-leaf spring with the same vertical stiffness are established and validated, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • L1262 Rev B 01-20 © 2016 – 2019 Hendrickson USA, L.L.C
    THE EVOLUTION OF TRAILER SUSPENSION DAMPING: A GUIDE TO BEST PRACTICES The noticeable ride benefits of suspension damping devices also bring maintenance challenges for fleets. Educate yourself on the evolution of damping methods to better manage long-term costs. All vehicles, passenger or commercial, are designed with damping in mind when it comes to the suspension. The primary goal of a suspension system is to carry the load from the vehicle while providing compliance between the sprung mass (chassis, trailer body, etc.) and the unsprung mass (the suspension, tires, wheels, brakes, etc). Damping devices, such as shock absorbers, are designed to add comfort and control by resisting the motion of the suspension. Without damping forces, a vehicle would have a tendency to bounce at its natural, or resonant, frequency. But over the service life of the vehicle, most suspension damping devices result in a compromise of either ride quality or added component maintenance. In the commercial trailer industry, managing issues like driver comfort, cargo protection, vehicle safety and government compliance can be a complicated balancing act. Understanding the fundamentals of damping enables fleets to better manage long-term maintenance and operation costs while keeping ride quality and driver satisfaction high. What Is Damping and Why Do I Need It? Damping describes the process of absorbing energy of road inputs that are transmitted through the suspension system. Suspension damping reduces the number and intensity of these inputs to the vehicle thereby helping to prolong the life of the vehicle and its components. In turn, this helps reduce overall operating and maintenance costs.
    [Show full text]