Steering and Suspension 2019
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Sp057 Leaf Spring Installation
SP057 LEAF SPRING INSTALLATION Also covering Part #RH015 1967-1969 CAMARO AND FIREBIRD NOTE: This part number is designed to use the original mounting hardware from a factory multi-leaf rear end setup. If you have a factory mono-leaf rear end or wish to upgrade the hardware for your multi-leaf setup, you can purchase the BMR leaf spring installation kit (Part #RH015). This kit includes new front mounting hardware, polyurethane leaf spring pads, larger U-bolts, and a heavy duty rear shackle kit with polyurethane frame bushings. INSTALLATION: 1. Lift vehicle and support with jack stands under the frame rails. 2. Remove the lower shock bolts. 3. Loosen the (4) nuts on the shock mounting plates then remove the plates. 4. Place a hydraulic jack under the axle. Lift the axle off the springs. 5. Loosen the nut on the rear lower shackle plates but do not remove the bolt. 6. Loosen the (3) bolts on the front leaf spring pocket and also remove the rear leaf spring bolt then remove the leaf spring from the vehicle. 7. If the vehicle was originally equipped with mono-leaf springs, knock out the factory bolts from the leaf spring axle mount (4 per side). Using a ½” drill bit, drill out the 4 holes in the leaf spring axle mounts. Also drill out the holes in the shock mounts to allow the use of ½” U-bolts. (IMAGE 1) 8. If you also purchased the leaf spring installation kit (RH015), replace the nut clips in the frame at this time. 9. If you purchased the leaf spring installation kit, knock out the upper bushings in the frame and install the supplied polyurethane bushings and inner steel sleeves. -
Adaption and Evaluation of Transversal Leaf Spring Suspension Design for a Lightweight Vehicle Using Adams /C Ar
ADAPTION AND EVALUATION OF TRANSVERSAL LEAF SPRING SUSPENSION DESIGN FOR A LIGHTWEIGHT VEHICLE USING ADAMS /C AR FLORIAN CHRIST Master Thesis in Vehicle Engineering Vehicle Dynamics Aeronautical and Vehicle Engineering Royal Institute of Technology TRITA-AVE 2015:09 ISSN 1651-7660 Adaption and Evaluation of Transversal Leaf Spring Suspension Design for a Lightweight Vehicle using Adams/Car FLORIAN CHRIST © Florian Christ, 2015. Vehicle Dynamics Department of Aeronautical and Vehicle Engineering Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan SE-100 44 Stockholm Sweden ii Abstract This investigation deals with the suspension of a lightweight medium-class vehicle for four passengers with a curb weight of 1000 kg. The suspension layout consists of a transversal leaf spring and is supported by an active air spring which is included in the damper. The lower control arms are replaced by the leaf spring ends. Active ride height control is introduced to compensate for different vehicle load states. Active steering is applied using electric linear actuators with steer-by wire design. Besides intense use of light material the inquiry should investigate whether elimination of suspension parts or a lighter component is concordant with the stability demands of the vehicle. The investigation is based on simulations obtained with MSC Software ADAMS/Car and Matlab. The suspension is modeled in Adams/Car and has to proof it's compliance in normal driving conditions and under extreme forces. Evaluation criteria are suspension kinematics and compliance such as camber, caster and toe change during wheel travel in different load states. Also the leaf spring deflection, anti-dive and anti-squat measures and brake force distribution are investigated. -
Mini-Tub Leaf-Spring Rear Suspension for 1964-70 Mustangs
CLICK for More Info Online Mini-Tub Leaf-Spring Rear Suspension for 1964-70 Mustangs • Additional 2-3/4” tire clearance • Stronger offset frame rail inserts • Adjustable suspension geometry • Choose spring rate and ride height Mini-Tub Leaf-Spring Rear Suspension The mini-tub leaf-spring suspension from Total Control Products Applications allows substantially greater clearance for extremely large tire and wheel Mustang 64-70 combinations. Relocated shocks and springs combined with the additional mini-tub clearance allow 2-3/4” more tire clearance on each side of the vehicle. Systems include all mounts, offset frame rail inserts, leaf springs, spring plates and shock absorbers. A panhard bar version of the suspension is also offered for sharper and more predictable handling. Optional components include a narrow- width, adjustable-rate anti-roll bar and fabricated Ford 9” housing (FAB9™). Currently available for all styles of 1964-70 Mustangs. NOTE: ‘65-66 GT rear valance is not compatible with suspension. 1 Rear Spring Mounts Offset Frame Rail Insert Front Spring Mounts Relocated mount with 2-3/4” additional tire Welds inboard of OEM supporting crossmember clearance per side frame rail Panhard Bar System Upper Shock Mounts Lateral locating device Relocates stem-mount for rear end housing style shock inboard of OEM position Anti-Roll Bar FAB9 Rear End Houisng Splined arms with Fabricated Ford 9” adjustable end-link housing, structurally positions to alter rate superior to OEM 2 Mini-Tub Leaf-Spring Suspension Shown with optional Anti-Roll -
Clay Modeling, Human Engineering and Aerodynamics in Passenger Car
^ 03 CLAY MODELING, HU>L\N ENGINEERING AND AERODYNAMICS IN PASSENGER CAR BODY DESIGN /^? by AJITKUMAR CHANDRAICANT KAPADIA B.E. (M.E.)> Maharaja Sayajirao University Baroda, India, 1962 A MASTER'S REPORT submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Industrial Engineering KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 1965 Appro/^ed by: 6 |9^5 TABLE OF CONTENTS ^P' INTRODUCTION 1 PURPOSE 3 MODELING OF PASSENGER G\RS 4 Sketches 4 Clay Models 5 APPLICATION OF HUMAN ENGINEERING / Design of Seat and Its Relative Position / 7 Design of Controls and Displays 28 AERODYNAMIC TESTING OF PASSENGER CARS 37 Aerodynamic Drag 40 Internal Flow Requirements 44 External flow pattern 45 Aerodynamic Noise 45 SU14MARY 47 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 50 REFERENCES 51 INTRODUCTION The history of the American automobile began when Dureay's demonstrated his first car in 1893. Horse-carts and chariots were the main vehicles up through the 19th century, but men dreamt of self-propelled highway vehicles. The invention of the internal combustion engine, with its compact size as compared to that of the steam engine helped realize this dream. These self-propelled automobiles were so novel to people that the engi- neers did not worry much about their shape and size. They mainly consisted of the engine and its components, wheels, and a seat on top with a steering device. Later, this seat was replaced by a carriage to accommodate more persons. These early cars were quite high mounted on the axles with open engine, that is, without any hood to cover the engine. -
A Comparative Study of the Suspension for an Off-Road Vehicle
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 07 Issue: 05 | May 2020 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 A Comparative study of the Suspension for an Off-Road Vehicle Sivadanus.S Department of Manufacturing Engineering, College of Engineering – Guindy, Chennai ---------------------------------------------------------------------***--------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract - Humans use different vehicles to travel in is set nothing can be adjusted or moved. This type of different terrains for comfort and ease of travel. An off-terrain suspension will not be considered in the scope of this project vehicle is generally used for rugged terrain and needs a largely due to its lack of adjustability. completely different dynamics in suspension comparison to an on-road vehicle. The aim of this project is to identify and Independent suspension systems provide more effective determine the parameters of vehicle dynamics with a proper functionality in traction and stability for off-roading study of suspension and to initiate a comparative study for an applications. Independent suspension systems provide flex off-road vehicle using different models. (the ability for one wheel to move vertically while still Key Words: Suspension, Vehicle Dynamics, Off-road allowing the other wheels to stay in contact with the Vehicle, Control arms, Camber surface). 1.INTRODUCTION There are many different versions and variations of independent suspensions, which include swing axle Suspension suspensions, transverse leaf spring suspensions, trailing and The role of a suspension system within a vehicle is to ensure semi-trailing suspensions, Macpherson strut suspensions, that contact between the tires and driving surface is and double wishbone suspensions. Control arms are used for continuously maintained. -
Specifiers & Installers Guide to TORSION BAR APPLICATIONS
Specifiers & Installers Guide To TORSION BAR APPLICATIONS WELCOME Thank you for specifying Sauber Torsion Bars. By choosing us as your stability partner, you derive the following benefits: * Improved Stability * Stability is safety, and safety is our first concern. A Sauber Torsion Bar can eliminate unwanted counterweight, offering your users an extra safety margin. Because Sauber bars don't rigidize the chassis frame, they always provide a smooth, quiet ride. * Long Life * Premium bronze and galvanized components. Bushings guaranteed and replaced as/if needed for 10 years. 10 Year parts coverage when inspected at no greater than four month intervals. * Excellent Documentation * Our comprehensive applications charts, installation instructions and detailed drawings provide the vital information you and your installers need in an organized format. * Superior Support * Toll-free phone and fax service from anywhere in North America provides easy access to the resources of our organization through your personal company representative. * Lower Life Cycle Costs * Since it takes less time to mount our bar, its installed cost can actually be less than other alternatives. Sauber Torsion Bars are designed and built to last as long as your chassis. * Extensive Inventory * Our inventory power puts our bar on the floor just when you want it. Your production schedule can't wait on your suppliers, and with us as your partner, it won't. * More Choices * Underframe or overframe, nobody provides more installation options than we do. More choices mean a better -
Modelling Commercial Vehicle Handling and Rolling Stability
357 CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Bradford Scholars Modelling commercial vehicle handling and rolling stability K HussainÃ, W Stein, and A J Day School of Engineering, Design, and Technology, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK The manuscript was received on 3 September 2004 and was accepted after revision for publication on 28 April 2005. DOI: 10.1243/146441905X48707 Abstract: This paper presents a multi-degrees-of-freedom non-linear multibody dynamic model of a three-axle heavy commercial vehicle tractor unit, comprising a subchassis, front and rear leaf spring suspensions, steering system, and ten wheels/tyres, with a semi-trailer comprising two axles and eight wheels/tyres. The investigation is mainly concerned with the rollover stability of the articulated vehicle. The models incorporate all sources of compliance, stiffness, and damping, all with non-linear characteristics, and are constructed and simulated using automatic dynamic analysis of mechanical systems formulation. A constant radius turn test and a single lane change test (according to the ISO Standard) are simulated. The constant radius turn test shows the understeer behaviour of the vehicle, and the single lane change manoeuvre was conducted to show the transient behaviour of the vehicle. Non-stable roll and yaw behaviour of the vehicle is predicted at test speeds .90 km/h. Rollover stability of the vehicle is also investigated using a constant radius turn test with increasing speed. The articulated laden vehicle model predicted increased understeer behaviour, due to higher load acting on the wheels of the middle and rear axles of the tractor and the influence of the semi-trailer, as shown by the reduced yaw rate and the steering angle variation during the con- stant radius turn. -
Roadmaster, Experts in Dinghy Towing, Introduces the Comfort Ride Slipper Leaf Spring and Shock Absorber Systems to Road-Weary Trailer and Fifth-Wheel Owners
article and photos by Bob Livingston SUSPENSION NIRVANA Roadmaster, experts in dinghy towing, introduces the Comfort Ride Slipper Leaf Spring and Shock Absorber systems to road-weary trailer and fifth-wheel owners railers and fifth-wheels take a lot of punishment a company immersed in the tow-bar business, catering on the road. Suspensions, designed to counter this to owners towing vehicles behind their motorhomes, has Tabuse, have not changed much over the years, and expanded its offerings in the towable arena with the intro- in most cases are the same ones found on chassis that date duction of the Comfort Ride Slipper Leaf Spring Suspension back a very long time. (The old line “This isn’t your grand- and Shock Absorber systems. father’s vehicle” does not apply.) While stock suspensions The concept is simple, and the result is a game changer hold the chassis off the ground, controlling the ride is not in the way trailers and fifth-wheels handle all road conditions. a strong attribute. One might ask, “Why worry about ride quality inside Leaf springs tied to shackles and a center-mounted a trailer when towing since no one is back there to feel equalizer are supposed to counter the bumps in the road the shakes, rattles and rolls? That’s a valid question, but but, with few exceptions, are not very effective. Roadmaster, subjecting a trailer to a constant 4.0-magnitude earthquake 74 TRAILER LIFE July 2018 Roadmaster’s Comfort Ride Slipper Leaf Spring and Shock Absorber systems bolt on to the frame with only minor drilling needed to mount the center box. -
Ride Control Defined
RIDE CONTROL DEFINED According to Newton's First Law, a moving body will continue moving in a straight line until it is acted upon by another force. Newton's Second Law states that for each action there is an equal and opposite reaction. In the case of the automobile, whether the disturbing force is in the form of a wind-gust, an incline in the roadway, or the cornering forces produced by tires, the force causing the action and the force resisting the action will always be in balance. Many things affect vehicles in motion. Weight distribution, speed, road conditions and wind are some factors that affect how vehicles travel down the highway. Under all these variables however, the vehicle suspension system including the shocks, struts and springs must be in good condition. Worn suspension components may reduce the stability of the vehicle and reduce driver control. They may also accelerate wear on other suspension components. Replacing worn or inadequate shocks and struts will help maintain good ride control as they: Control spring and suspension movement Provide consistent handling and braking Prevent premature tire wear Help keep the tires in contact with the road Maintain dynamic wheel alignment Control vehicle bounce, roll, sway, dive and acceleration squat Reduce wear on other vehicle systems Promote even and balanced tire and brake wear Reduce driver fatigue Suspension concepts and components have changed and will continue to change dramatically, but the basic objective remains the same: 1. Provide steering stability with good handling characteristics 2. Maximize passenger comfort Achieving these objectives under all variables of a vehicle in motion is called ride control 1 BASIC TERMINOLOGY To begin this training program, you need to possess some very basic information. -
Vehicle Pull, Steering Wheel Off Center, and Alignment Best Practices
T-SB-0063-20 June 23, 2020 Vehicle Pull, Steering Wheel Off Center, and Alignment Best Practices Service Category Suspension Section Alignment/Handling Diagnoses Market USA Applicability YEAR(S) MODEL(S) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 2002 - 2021 4Rrunner, 4Runner, 86, Avalon, Avalon HV, Avanza, C-HR, Camry, Camry HV, Celica, Corolla, Corolla BR- Prod, Corolla Hatchback, Corolla HV, Echo, FJ Cruiser, Hiace, Highlander, Highlander HV, Hilux, iA, iM, Land Cruiser, Matrix, Mirai, Mirai (Canada), MR2 Spyder, Prius, Prius C, Prius PHV, Prius Prime, Prius V, RAV4, RAV4 EV, RAV4 HV, RAV4 Prime, Sequoia, Sienna, Solara, Supra, Tacoma, Tundra, Venza, Yaris, Yaris HB MEX-Prod, Yaris R, Yaris SD MEX- Prod, Yaris THAI-Prod SUPERSESSION NOTICE The information contained in this bulletin supersedes Service Bulletin Nos. ST005-01, SU001-08, and T-SB-0391-08. The aforementioned bulletins are obsolete, and any printed versions should be discarded. Be sure to review the entire content of this service bulletin before proceeding. Introduction This Service Bulletin provides best practice procedures for vehicle pulling complaint, diagnosis, and repair for 2002 – 2021 model year Toyota vehicles. This information supplements Repair Manual procedures when the symptoms are: Vehicle Pulling: The vehicle moves to the right or left when the driver holds the steering wheel while driving straight ahead without exerting steering effort. Steering Wheel Off Center: The vehicle travels straight, but the steering wheel is not pointed straight ahead. The vehicle is not pulling. © 2020 Toyota Motor Sales, USA Page 1 of 23 T-SB-0063-20 June 23, 2020 Page 2 of 23 Vehicle Pull, Steering Wheel Off Center, and Alignment Best Practices Introduction (continued) Before repairing a vehicle pulling to one side, it is necessary to clearly identify the cause of the pulling condition. -
A Novel Chassis Concept for Power Steering Systems Driven by Wheel Individual Torque at the Front Axle M
25th Aachen Colloquium Automobile and Engine Technology 2016 1 A Novel Chassis Concept For Power Steering Systems Driven By Wheel Individual Torque At The Front Axle M. Sc. Philipp Kautzmann Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Vehicle System Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany M. Sc. Jürgen Römer Schaeffler Technologies AG & Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Germany Dr.-Ing. Michael Frey Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Vehicle System Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany Dr.-Ing. Marcel Ph. Mayer Schaeffler Technologies AG & Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Germany Summary The project "Intelligent Assisted Steering System with Optimum Energy Efficiency for Electric Vehicles (e²-Lenk)" focuses on a novel assisted steering concept for electric vehicles. We analysed different suspensions to use with this innovative power steering concept driven by wheel individual drive torque at the front axle. Our investigations show the potential even for conventional suspensions but reveal the limitations of standard chassis design. Optimized suspension parameters are needed to generate steering torque efficiently. Requirements arise from emergency braking, electronic stability control systems and the potential of the suspension for the use with our steering system. In lever arm design a trade-off between disturbing and utilizable forces occurs. We present a new design space for a novel chassis layout and discuss a first suspension design proposal with inboard motors, a small scrub radius and a big disturbance force lever arm. 1 Introduction Electric vehicles are a promising opportunity to reduce local greenhouse gas emissions in transport and increase overall energy efficiency, as electric drivetrain vehicles operate more efficiently compared to conventionally motorized vehicles. The internal combustion engine of common vehicles not only accelerates the vehicle, but also supplies energy to on-board auxiliary systems, such as power-assisted steering, which reduces the driver’s effort at the steering wheel. -
Rollover of Heavy Commercial Vehicles
Rollover of Heavy Commercial Vehicles - UMTRI-99- 19 August, 1999 C. B. Winkler R. D. Ervin The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute 2901 Baxter Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48 109 for Volvo Truck Corporation, AB Goteborg, Sweden and the Great Lakes Center for Truck and Transit Research Ann Arbor, Michigan Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Reciplent's Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date August, 1999 Rollover of Heavy Commercial Vehicles 6. Performing Organization Code 8. Performing Organlzatlon Report Nio. 7. Author@) Winkler, C. B.; Ervin, R.D. - 9. Performing Organlzation Name and Address 1 10. work unit NO. (TRAIS) The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute 11. Contract or Grant NO. 2901 Baxter Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2150 13. Type of Report and Perlod Coverejd - 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Final Report Volvo Truck Corporation, 1B Great lakes Center for Truck and Transit Research 14. Sponsoring Agency Code I 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract The state-of-the-art understanding of rollover of the commercial vehicle is reviewed. Accident statistics are presented which highlight the severity and lethal nature of rollover crashes. Physical and statistical evidlence for the linkage between vehicle roll stability and the actual occurrence of rollover accidents is presented. The fundamentals of static roll stability are described in detail and then enhanced with discussion of dynamilc considerations of the rollover process. The text concludes with a discussion of the evolving use of intelligent electronic systems and active vehicle control for reducing the occurrence of rollover.