Hydrofoils and Chesapeake Bay Ferries

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hydrofoils and Chesapeake Bay Ferries International Hydrofoil Society 11 March 2010 Mark Rice, P.E. & Jeanne Torstenson, P.E. Hydrofoils and Chesapeake Bay Ferries Graphic from Google Earth Graphic from Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Chesapeake Bay Growth Since 1986 Outline Early Ferry Transportation & Transition to Bridges John Smith Historic Waterway Trail Transportation Changes? Hydrofoil Ferries for Chesapeake Bay Technology Options for Reducing Hydrofoil Energy Consumption BALTIMORE ROCK HALL ANNAPOLI KENT ISLAND S SHADY SIDE ST. MICHAELS CAMBRIDGE SOLOMONS/ LEXINGTON PARK CRISFIELD REEDVILLE ONANCOC K CAPE CHARLES WILLIAMSBUR YORKTOWN G HAMPTON VA BEACH NORFOLK Common 19th & 20th Century Ferry Routes 1640 - 1952 Slower pace No bridges Lots of Time No other choice Alternative routes were very long 19th Century Chesapeake Bay excursion steamboat the Emma Giles, circa 1890 1829: The Washington, Alexandria, and Baltimore Steam-packet Company was succeeded by the Washington, Alexandria and Georgetown Steam –packet Company 1840: Baltimore Steam Packet Company is founded. Early 20th Century Love Point Resort Steamer Westmoreland at Love Point - 1910 - two dollars for the car and driver - $0.50 per passenger Baltimore 1912 Early 20th Century Steamboat Louise Steamer Nellie White Early 20th Century Steamer Routes • Tolchester – Baltimore • Baltimore – Love Point • Annapolis – St Michaels • Annapolis – Matapeake - Claiborne Baltimore Harbor 1935 1930s Steamers Luxury Steamer President Warfield – Built for Chesapeake Bay Converted to a Troop Ship in WW II – Survived a torpedo attack Purchased as scrap – Renamed EXODUS Covertly Carried 4,554 Illegal Jewish Emigrants to Palestine in 1947 1928 - 1964 316’ M.V. North Hampton – 1948-1964 339’ S.S. Delmarva – 1933-1964 339’ S.S. Virginia Lee – 1928-1964 291’ S.S. Accomac – 1951-1964 339’ S.S. Princess Anne – 1932-1964 305’ M.V. Old Point Comfort – 1958-1964 358’ S.S. Pocahontas – 1941-1964 327’ M.V. Virginia Beach – 1961-1964 Two Fixed Crossings Chesapeake Bay Bridge – 4.35 miles – Opened 1952 / Second span 1973 – $2.50 toll east bound only – State and Federal tax dollars (~$5B total in 2010 dollars) – 2009: 65,000 trips/day on weekdays, 95,000 trips on summer weekends – 2025: 85,000 trips/day on weekdays, 135,000 trips on summer weekends Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel – 17.6 miles – Opened 1964 / Second span 1999 – $12.00 toll south bound only – Financed by state guaranteed revenue bonds (~$2.3B total in 2010 dollars) – Replaced ferry service (1930s–1964) – ~10,000 trips/day Chesapeake Bay Bridge Summer Congestion: 95,000 trips per day Bridge Is Now Over Capacity During Summer • 60,000 avg. daily trips in 2004 -- 86,000 avg. daily trips in 2025 • 11,000 people commute daily from the Eastern Shore to the Western Shore • Eastern Shore will experience a growth spike in the next 30 years on the order of 150% • New bridge will cost $3B+ and is at least 15 years away Task Force on Traffic Capacity Across the Chesapeake Bay - Bridge Study Results Puget Sound Comparison 28 Vessels, 10 routes, 11 million cars + 26 million people per year 2 Bridges, 30 million vehicles per year Outline Early Ferry Transportation & Transition to Bridges Captain John Smith Historic Waterway Trail Transportation Changes? Hydrofoil Ferries for Chesapeake Bay Hydrofoil Technical Advances Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail • National Park Service • Authorized by Congress – 12/06 • Numerous Commercial Partners • 150+ Designated Sites and Attractions Captain John Smith Trail Maryland Points of Interest Tributary Points of Interest Chesapeake Bay An International Tourist Destination History – Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail – Washington, D.C. – Williamsburg & Jamestown – Baltimore & Annapolis Ecology – Estuary ecology walks and watercraft trips – Smithsonian Institution – 8 National Wildlife Refuges Entertainment – Water sports and Beaches – Baltimore – Washington attractions – Aquariums, Museums, Bicycle Trips Outline Early Ferry Transportation & Transition to Bridges Captain John Smith Historic Waterway Trail Transportation Changes? Hydrofoil Ferries for Chesapeake Bay Hydrofoil Technical Advances Fast Ferry Energy Use (BTU/Passenger Mile) Fuel Efficiency - BTU/Passenger Statue Mile at 50% Load Fraction 14000 11788 12000 10000 8000 7145 6253 6549 6727 42 kts 6000 5123 4000 2000 34 kts 36 kts 37 kts 50 kts 0 40 kts MAPC 250 MAPC 200 MAPC 149 FA Cat SP Hydrofoil JetFoil Shaded values are estimates, Full Load Calm Sea Not The Most Efficient Per Mile Energy Use per Passenger Mile 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 BTU/passenger-mile . 0 Airlines Amtrak Transit Bus Automobile Electric Car Prius Hybrid . MAPC 250 Hydrofoil . 2008 Transportation Energy Data Book, US Department of Energy & Other Sources Rock Hall/Tolchester – Baltimore Passenger Ferry Ferry is VERY Efficient on a Per Passenger Trip Basis Kent County residents going to Baltimore Shopping Hospitals and doctors Universities Concerts / museums / plays / restaurants / BSO Orioles / Ravens games Commute to higher paying jobs Connect to BWI, Amtrak, MARC, Greyhound Produce / seafood delivery to Baltimore School/club/retirement community tours & charters Baltimore residents going to Kent County Museums / historic sites / antique shops Bicycle trips Bed and breakfasts / restaurants Marinas / boating Connecting transportation going to Atlantic coast Flexcar / Zipcar rental on the Eastern Shore 87 s. miles by road School/club/retirement community trips School/club/retirement community tours & charters 19 n. miles by ferry Transportation Tomorrow - Conjecture Short-haul vehicles – Electric car becomes dominant - 60 to 80 miles between charges – Highway & bridge congestion continue to grow - Commuter rail and ferry grow due to congestion & efficiency - Electric power “from the road” or new battery technology Electric cars move into the mid-haul market Mid-haul trips – Hybrid bio-diesel electric car for mid-range – More intermodal options for people who own only electric cars - Greater inter-city rail - Regional air travel with more efficient small aircraft Long-haul – Remains the purview of large airplanes which continue to get more efficient Market for Ferry Travel on the Chesapeake Returns Outline Early Ferry Transportation & Transition to Bridges Captain John Smith Historic Waterway Trail Transportation Changes? Hydrofoil Ferries for Chesapeake Bay Hydrofoil Technical Advances Waterways As Transportation Corridors Low-Cost Low-Impact Alternative to New Bridges A Smart Growth Opportunity Small High-Speed Passenger Vessels - Frequent Service – Shallow draft (6.5 feet), 149-passengers – High quality, high speed (35-50 knots) – Rock Hall/Tolchester – Baltimore – Annapolis – Matapeake - Baltimore – St Michaels – Annapolis - Baltimore – Cambridge – Annapolis – Shady Side – Annapolis – Aberdeen – Baltimore – Betterton – Solomons - Honga Mesh with Future Transportation Systems Ferry as an integral component of the total transportation system Baltimore side – Established local mass transit via MTA bus, light rail, taxi – Established connections to long-range transit - Connections to BWI - Connections to MARC train, Amtrak and intercity bus Eastern shore side – Connecting bus to the beach – Flexcar / Zipcar rentals – Private bus services – Feeder buses to the ferry Chesapeake Bay Passenger Hydrofoil • 90 feet, 75 L.tons • 7.5 ft / 5 ft drafts • 20 ft Air Draft • 26 foot beam • Three strut hydrofoil • Caterpillar C32 engines • Sea state 3 • 37 or 50 knots variants • Stern or side loading • 149 passengers + luggage • Fixed shallow-draft struts, Rolls Royce CPZ Drives • USCG Subchapter T + IMO High Speed Code Chesapeake Passenger Ferry Market discriminator for Baltimore port cities (Baltimore, Annapolis, Cambridge, etc.) – Commuters – Tourism Smart Growth Development opportunities in Bay communities – Fosters alternative and intermodal transportation – Creates investment in town centers – Fosters Appropriate Economic development in small communities No expensive infrastructure required Energy efficient Flexible solution – not tied to road or bridge investments – Routes can be changed – Magnitude can be altered Enables travel on the John Smith Waterway New York Markets New York Hydrofoil • 90 feet, 75 L.tons • 14 ft / 9 ft drafts • 22 ft Air Draft • 26 foot beam • Three strut hydrofoil • Caterpillar C32 engines • Sea state 4 • 37 or 50 knots variants • Stern or side loading • 149 passengers + luggage • Fixed shallow-draft struts, Rolls Royce CPZ Drives • USCG Subchapter T + IMO High Speed Code Resistance New York Variant – Power vs Speed Range and Endurance Open Ocean Routes • 132 feet, 125 L.tons • 16 ft / 8.5 ft drafts • 32 ft Air Draft • 24 foot beam • Three strut hydrofoil • Caterpillar C32 engines • Sea state 4+ • 40 knots • Stern or side loading • 250 passengers + luggage • Fixed shallow-draft struts, Rolls Royce CPZ Drives • USCG Subchapter T + IMO High Speed Code Open Water Markets UK - France Caribbean Brazil Mediterranean Asia Next Generation Hydrofoils? Maritime Applied Physics Corporation – in the Fairfield Section of Baltimore City Wing In Ground Effect Hydrofoil + = Limited speed Good speed Good speed Good seakeeping Poor seakeeping Good seakeeping Good control Poor control Good control Wing In Ground Effect 25% reduction in fuel use per passenger mile Hydrofoil (WIGH) relative to existing 40-knot ferries Higher Speed WIGH Lift Regimes Buoyant Lift Aero/Hydro Lift 100 Subcavitating Hydrofoil Lift Catamaran 75 Hullborne ->
Recommended publications
  • The Stepped Hull Hybrid Hydrofoil
    The Stepped Hull Hybrid Hydrofoil Christopher D. Barry, Bryan Duffty Planing @brid hydrofoils or partially hydrofoil supported planing boat are hydrofoils that intentionally operate in what would be the takeoff condition for a norma[ hydrofoil. They ofler a compromise ofperformance and cost that might be appropriate for ferq missions. The stepped hybrid configuration has made appearances in the high speed boat scene as early as 1938. It is a solution to the problems of instability and inefficiency that has limited other type of hybrids. It can be configured to have good seakeeping as well, but the concept has not been used as widely as would be justified by its merits. The purpose of this paper is to reintroduce this concept to the marine community, particularly for small, fast ferries. We have performed analytic studies, simple model experiments and manned experiments, andfiom them have determined some specljic problems and issues for the practical implementation of this concept. This paper presents background information, discusses key concepts including resistance, stability, seakeeping, and propulsion and suggests solutions to what we believe are the problems that have limited the widespread acceptance of this concept. Finally we propose a “strawman” design for a ferry in a particular service using this technology. BACKGROUND Partially hydrofoil supported planing hulls mix hydrofoil support and planing lift. The most obvious A hybrid hydrofoil is a vehicle combining the version of this concept is a planing hull with a dynamic lift of hydrofoils with a significant amount of hydrofoil more or less under the center of gravity. lit? tiom some other source, generally either buoyancy Karafiath (1974) studied this concept and ran model or planing lift.
    [Show full text]
  • Woodland Ferry History
    Woodland Ferry: Crossing the Nanticoke River from the 1740s to the present Carolann Wicks Secretary, Department of Transportation Welcome! This short history of the Woodland Ferry, which is listed in the National Register of Historic Places, was written to mark the commissioning of a new ferryboat, the Tina Fallon, in 2008. It is an interesting and colorful story. TIMELINE 1608 Captain John Smith explores 1843 Jacob Cannon Jr. murdered at the the Nanticoke River, and encounters wharf. Brother Isaac Cannon dies one Nanticoke Indians. Native Americans month later. Ferry passes to their sister have resided in the region for thousands Luraney Boling of years 1845 Inventory of Luraney Boling’s 1734 James Cannon purchases a estate includes “one wood scow, one land tract called Cannon’s Regulation at schooner, one large old scow, two small Woodland old scows, one ferry scow, one old and worn out chain cable, one lot of old cable 1743? James Cannon starts operating a chains and two scow chains, on and ferry about the wharves” 1748 A wharf is mentioned at the 1883 Delaware General Assembly ferry passes an act authorizing the Levy Court of Sussex County to establish and 1751 James Cannon dies and his son maintain a ferry at Woodland Jacob takes over the ferry 1885 William Ellis paid an annual 1766 A tax of 1,500 lbs. of tobacco salary of $119.99 by Sussex County for is paid “to Jacob Cannon for keeping operating the ferry a Ferry over Nanticoke River the Year past” 1930 Model “T” engine attached to the wooden ferryboat 1780 Jacob Cannon dies and
    [Show full text]
  • Human Powered Hydrofoil Design & Analytic Wing Optimization
    Human Powered Hydrofoil Design & Analytic Wing Optimization Andy Gunkler and Dr. C. Mark Archibald Grove City College Grove City, PA 16127 Email: [email protected] Abstract – Human powered hydrofoil watercraft can have marked performance advantages over displacement-hull craft, but pose significant engineering challenges. The focus of this hydrofoil independent research project was two-fold. First of all, a general vehicle configuration was developed. Secondly, a thorough optimization process was developed for designing lifting foils that are highly efficient over a wide range of speeds. Given a well-defined set of design specifications, such as vehicle weight and desired top speed, an optimal horizontal, non-surface- piercing wing can be engineered. Design variables include foil span, area, planform shape, and airfoil cross section. The optimization begins with analytical expressions of hydrodynamic characteristics such as lift, profile drag, induced drag, surface wave drag, and interference drag. Research of optimization processes developed in the past illuminated instances in which coefficients of lift and drag were assumed to be constant. These shortcuts, made presumably for the sake of simplicity, lead to grossly erroneous regions of calculated drag. The optimization process developed for this study more accurately computes profile drag forces by making use of a variable coefficient of drag which, was found to be a function of the characteristic Reynolds number, required coefficient of lift, and airfoil section. At the desired cruising speed, total drag is minimized while lift is maximized. Next, a strength and rigidity analysis of the foil eliminates designs for which the hydrodynamic parameters produce structurally unsound wings. Incorporating constraints on minimum takeoff speed and power required to stay foil-borne isolates a set of optimized design parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • A Strategy to Improve Public Transit with an Environmentally Friendly Ferry System
    A Strategy to Improve Public Transit with an Environmentally Friendly Ferry System Final Implementation & Operations Plan July 2003 San Francisco Bay Area Water Transit Authority Dear Governor Davis and Members of the California Legislature: After two years of work, the San Francisco Bay Area Water Transit Finally, as the Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) Authority (WTA) is delivering an Implementation and Operations details, this system is environmentally responsible. Plan. It is a viable strategy to improve Bay Area public transit with an environmentally friendly ferry system. It is a well- From beginning to end, this plan is built on solid, conservative thought-out plan calling for a sensible transportation investment. technical data and financial assumptions. If the State of California It shows how the existing and new individual ferry routes can adopts this plan and it is funded, we can begin making expanded form a well-integrated water-transit system that provides good water transit a reality. connections to other transit. The current economy makes it tough to find funds for new When you enacted Senate Bill 428 in October 1999, the WTA programs, even those as worthy as expanded Bay Area water was formed and empowered to create a plan for new and expanded transit. The Authority understands the economic challenges it water transit services and related ground transportation faces and is already working hard to overcome that hurdle. terminal access services. It was further mandated that the Today, the Authority’s future is unclear, pending your consideration. Authority must study ridership demand, cost-effectiveness But the prospects for expanded Bay Area water transit — and and expanded water transit’s environmental impact.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Fact Book
    2008 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FACT BOOK 59th Edition June 2008 PUBLISHED BY American Public Transportation Association American Public Transportation Association 1666 K Street, N.W., Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20006 TELEPHONE: (202) 496-4800 EMAIL: [email protected] WEBSITE: www.apta.com APTA’s Vision Statement Be the leading force in advancing public transportation. APTA’s Mission Statement APTA serves and leads its diverse membership through advocacy, innovation, and information sharing to strengthen and expand public transportation. APTA’s Policy on Diversity APTA recognizes the importance of diversity for conference topics and speakers and is committed to increasing the awareness of its membership on diversity issues. APTA welcomes ideas and suggestions on how to strengthen its efforts to meet these important diversity objectives. Prepared by John Neff, Senior Policy Researcher [email protected] (202) 496-4812 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FACT BOOK American Public Transportation Association Washington, DC June 2008 Material from 2008 Public Transportation Fact Book may be quoted or reproduced without obtaining the permission of the American Public Transportation Association. Suggested Identification: American Public Transportation Association: Public Transportation Fact Book, Washington, DC, June, 2008. TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents 28. Fossil Fuel Consumption by Mode…………….. 31 29. Non-diesel Fossil Fuel Consumption by Fuel… 31 INTRODUCTION 30. Bus Power Sources…....................................... 31 31. Bus Fossil Fuel Consumption…………………... 32 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW…………… 7 32. Paratransit Fuel Consumption………………….. 32 33. Rail Vehicle Fuel and Power Consumption….… 32 NATIONAL SUMMARY………………………….....…… 15 SAFETY………………………...............………..........… 33 1. Number of Public Transportation Service Providers by Mode……………………………… 15 34. Fatality Rates by Mode of Travel, 2001-2003… 33 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Conditions of Carriage of Calmac Ferries Limited
    CONDITIONS OF CARRIAGE OF CALMAC FERRIES LIMITED Preamble These Conditions of Carriage (the “Conditions”) of CalMac Ferries Limited (the “Company”) are incorporated within and form part of any and all contracts of carriage entered into by Passengers, Shippers and Users (as defi ned below) with the Company. The Conditions are set out in 5 sections as follows:- A. PRELIMINARY Definitions; Interpretation; Carriage undertaken; Principal forms of Contract of Carriage; Agency in respect of Passengers; Deemed ticketing or Deemed consignment. B. CONDITIONS IN RESPECT OF VESSELS/SERVICES Discretion as to Carriage; Variations with regard to sailing; Impediments to Loading, Carriage, etc; Compliance with C. LIABILITY, ETC Liability under the Athens Convention; Athens Convention explanatory note; Liability in other situations, Death/Personal injury; Livestock; Time Limit for Claims; Dogs and other Pet Animals; Defect/Failure of any Services; Additional loss or damage; Benefi t of all rights and exemptions; Company acting as agent; Medical attention; Refrigerated trailers; Lighterage expense/Livestock Consignment; No undertaking as to Notice of Arrival of Goods, etc; No undertaking as to safe custody of jewellery, etc; The Company’s right to hold Goods, etc; Damage caused by Passengers, Shippers and Users; Maximum protection allowed by Law/Time Limits; D. REGULATIONS IN RESPECT OF DANGEROUS GOODS AND SUBSTANCES Dangerous Goods and Substances; Shipment of Dangerous Goods and substances explanatory note; Regulations for the conveyance of petrol, fuel oil, and cylinders and cartridges of liquefi ed hydrocarbon gas in vehicles on board Vessels; Breach of Regulations; E. GENERAL MATTERS Luggage entitlement; Miscellaneous; Storekeepers/warehousemen; Instructions and searches; Ticketing Conditions, etc; Governing Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting to Orsa Maggiore Hotel Orsa Maggiore Is Located in Anacapri, the Highest and Most Peaceful Area of the Island of Capri
    How to get to Hotel Orsa Maggiore Getting to Orsa Maggiore Hotel Orsa Maggiore is located in Anacapri, the highest and most peaceful area of the island of Capri. We provide a free shuttle service on arrival and departure , from the port to the hotel and vice versa. Navigational companies: Call us a couple of hours before you are scheduled to arrive on the island, letting us know which ferry or Roma Aliscafi SNAV +39 081 8377577 hydrofoil you are going to take: you’ll find our driver waiting for you at the port. ORSA MAGGIORE Caremar Spa +39 081 8370700 NLG Navigazione Libera del Golfo +39 081 8370819 Phone: +39 081 8373351 Port Authority +39 081 8370226 Capri’s port is a small one and it's not always possible to park vehicles near to the landing docks. When Tourist Information Offices the port is busy, we ask guests to wait for the driver next to the Funicular railway ticket office. +39 081 8370686 Our shuttle service is available from 09.00 until 20.30. Should you decide to arrive or leave early in the Napoli morning or late in the evening, you will need to take a taxi or the bus (Marina Grande-Anacapri). Sorrento Positano Capri Hydrofoils and ferries to Capri depart from Naples and Sorrento. How long will the journey take? In the summer months, sea crossings are also From Rome airport: minimum 3 hours available from Positano, Amalfi, Salerno and (traveling by fast train and without missing a the island of Ischia. single connection) Times of crossings are subject to variation and From Naples airport: 90mins it’s always a good idea to check the hydrofoil From Sorrento: 30mins and ferry schedule before you travel to the port.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning and Operational Analyses for a New Intercity Transit Service
    Planning and Operational Analyses for A New Intercity Transit Service Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Ranjbari, Andisheh Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 25/09/2021 07:58:17 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/630234 PLANNING AND OPERATIONAL ANALYSES FOR A NEW INTERCITY TRANSIT SERVICE By ANDISHEH RANJBARI ________________________ Copyright © Andisheh Ranjbari 2018 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MECHANICS In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2018 THE LTNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Commiuee, we certifu that we have read the dissertation prepared by Andisheh Ranjbari, titled Planning and Operation Analyses for A New Intercity Transit Service and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Date: May 3,2418 Date: May 3,2018 Mark D. Hickman Date: May 3,2018 Neng Fan Date: May 3,2018 Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate's submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College. I hereby certiff that I have read this dissertation prepared under my direction and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement.
    [Show full text]
  • Potomac River Transporation Plan.Indd
    Potomac River Transportation Framework Plan Washington DC, Virginia, Maryland Water transportation is the most economical, energy effi cient and environmentally friendly transportation that exists for major cities today. The vast river network that was the original lifeblood of the Washington, DC region remains underutilized. The Potomac River Transportation Framework Plan is a comprehensive master plan outlining a water based transportation network on the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers in Washington, DC, Maryland and Virginia, for commuters, tourists and the federal government (defense and civilian evacuations). This plan outlines an enormous opportunity to expand the transportation network at a fraction of the cost (both in dollars and environmental impact) of other transportation modes. The plan includes intermodal connections to the existing land based public transportation system. See Detail Plan GEORGETOWN REGIONAL PLAN KENNEDY CENTER RFK STADIUM NATIONAL MALL THE WHARF BASEBALL The plan to the left GEORGETOWN STADIUM NAVY YARD PENTAGON BUZZARD POINT/ SOCCER STADIUM POPLAR POINT illustrates the reach of FORT MCNAIR JBAB the transporation plan KENNEDY CENTER that includes Virginia, NATIONAL AIRPORT RFK STADIUM JBAB / ST. ELIZABETHS SOUTH Maryland, and the DAINGERFIELD ISLAND NATIONAL MALL GENON SITE District of Columbia, CANAL CENTER ROBINSON TERMINAL NORTH fully integrated with THE OLD TOWN- KING STREET existing land based WHARF ROBINSON TERMINAL SOUTH BASEBALL PENTAGON STADIUM NAVY YARD JONES POINT transporation. NATIONAL HARBOR POPLAR POINT BUZZARD POINT/SOCCER STADIUM FORT MCNAIR JBAB A TERMINAL ‘A’ Both Plans illustrate B TERMINAL ‘B’ C TERMINAL ‘C’ potential routes and landings for D TERMINAL ‘D’ MOUNT VERNON FORT WASHINGTON Commuters, Tourists NATIONAL AIRPORT and the Federal JBAB / ST.
    [Show full text]
  • Course Objectives Chapter 2 2. Hull Form and Geometry
    COURSE OBJECTIVES CHAPTER 2 2. HULL FORM AND GEOMETRY 1. Be familiar with ship classifications 2. Explain the difference between aerostatic, hydrostatic, and hydrodynamic support 3. Be familiar with the following types of marine vehicles: displacement ships, catamarans, planing vessels, hydrofoil, hovercraft, SWATH, and submarines 4. Learn Archimedes’ Principle in qualitative and mathematical form 5. Calculate problems using Archimedes’ Principle 6. Read, interpret, and relate the Body Plan, Half-Breadth Plan, and Sheer Plan and identify the lines for each plan 7. Relate the information in a ship's lines plan to a Table of Offsets 8. Be familiar with the following hull form terminology: a. After Perpendicular (AP), Forward Perpendiculars (FP), and midships, b. Length Between Perpendiculars (LPP or LBP) and Length Overall (LOA) c. Keel (K), Depth (D), Draft (T), Mean Draft (Tm), Freeboard and Beam (B) d. Flare, Tumble home and Camber e. Centerline, Baseline and Offset 9. Define and compare the relationship between “centroid” and “center of mass” 10. State the significance and physical location of the center of buoyancy (B) and center of flotation (F); locate these points using LCB, VCB, TCB, TCF, and LCF st 11. Use Simpson’s 1 Rule to calculate the following (given a Table of Offsets): a. Waterplane Area (Awp or WPA) b. Sectional Area (Asect) c. Submerged Volume (∇S) d. Longitudinal Center of Flotation (LCF) 12. Read and use a ship's Curves of Form to find hydrostatic properties and be knowledgeable about each of the properties on the Curves of Form 13. Calculate trim given Taft and Tfwd and understand its physical meaning i 2.1 Introduction to Ships and Naval Engineering Ships are the single most expensive product a nation produces for defense, commerce, research, or nearly any other function.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Get to Capri Town How to Get to Capri Town Upon Arrival at the Marina Grande Port, Take the Funicular to the Center of Capri (A Four Minute Ride)
    How to get to Capri Town How to Get to Capri Town Upon arrival at the Marina Grande port, take the funicular to the center of Capri (a four minute ride). Once you have exited the funicular, instead of climbing the stairs to the scenic terrace, pass through the Navigational companies: gate on the left. You will find yourself in a narrow lane; walk down a few meters and Capri Town is on the Aliscafi SNAV +39 081 8377577 right. Caremar Spa +39 081 8370700 NLG Navigazione Libera del Golfo Roma +39 081 8370819 To transport baggage on the funicular, you must buy a supplementary ticket for €1.80 per piece. Port Authority +39 081 8370226 If you choose to take a taxi to get here, keep in mind that the car can't reach directly the door of Capri Town, since it is situated in a pedestrian area. Ask the driver to leave you in Piazzetta (and not at the beginning of Tourist Information Offices Via Acquaviva). From here follow the stairs that go down between Piccolo Bar and Bar Caso. In this way you +39 081 8370686 have to walk only a short downhill section. Napoli Sorrento Positano Capri Hydrofoils and ferries to Capri depart from Naples and Sorrento. In the summer months, How long will the journey take? sea crossings are also available from From Rome airport: minimum 3 hours Positano, Amalfi, Salerno and the island of (traveling by fast train and without missing a Ischia. Times of crossings are subject to variation and it’s always a good idea to check single connection) the hydrofoil and ferry schedule before you From Naples airport: 90mins travel to the port.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 NTD Policy Manual for Reduced Reporters
    Office of Budget and Policy National Transit Database 2019 Policy Manual REDUCED REPORTING 2019 NTD Reduced Reporter Policy Manual TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Exhibits .............................................................................................................. v Acronyms and Abbreviations .................................................................................... vii Report Year 2019 Policy Changes and Reporting Clarifications .............................. 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 6 The National Transit Database ................................................................................... 7 History .................................................................................................................... 7 NTD Data ................................................................................................................ 8 Data Use and Funding .......................................................................................... 11 Failure to Report ................................................................................................... 14 Inaccurate Data .................................................................................................... 15 Standardized Reporting Requirements ..................................................................... 15 Reporting Due Dates ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]