4.0 EXISTING TRANSIT PROFILE 33 These Services

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

4.0 EXISTING TRANSIT PROFILE 33 These Services 32 public. Private for profit or private nonprofit entities may operate 1 4.0 EXISTING TRANSIT PROFILE 33 these services. 2 This chapter summarizes the key features of the state’s existing 34 Intercity passenger rail service through Amtrak is publicly funded 3 (includes those under construction) public and private transit and 35 operating as a for profit corporation. 4 rail services, and presents an overview of the human service 36 Figure 4-1 shows the overall Colorado Transit Network of existing 5 agencies providing specialized transportation services in the state. 37 bus and passenger rail services. Each service type is also discussed 6 Information includes service types, service areas, passenger 38 and illustrated in the following sections. 7 eligibility, and ridership, where available. 39 4.1.1 Existing Bus Services 8 Existing Transit Systems in Colorado 40 Various bus services operate across Colorado to provide intercity, 9 The state of Colorado has over 55 urban and rural public transit and 41 regional, interregional and local services. This section provides an 10 rail providers, over 100 human service agencies that provide 42 overview of the various service types, providers, and existing 11 transportation services, and many private transit providers. These 43 services. 12 providers offer a wide range of services 13 to effectively meet the needs of the Colorado has over 55 44 Intercity Bus Service urban and rural public 14 traveling public in their area. They are 45 Intercity bus service provides regularly scheduled long-distance transit and rail 15 both public and private entities, with providers, over 100 46 travel connecting urban areas throughout the nation, is typically 16 the private entities operating as both human services 47 funded with fares, carries luggage and sometimes packages, and 17 nonprofit or for profit organizations. transportation 48 connects with national intercity services. Intercity bus generally 18 Local or regional agencies fund publicly providers and a 49 operates with limited frequency (often one trip per day in each number private transit 19 operated bus and rail services, which 50 direction), but usually operates every day. Intercity service is providers. 20 are open to all members of the public. 51 provided by private, for-profit carriers with CDOT providing 21 Cities, counties, or regional authorities 52 financial assistance to support these services. 22 typically operate these services. Sometimes they operate in 53 In Colorado there are eight providers of intercity bus services. 23 partnership with nonprofit agencies. 54 There are six private operators of fixed-route intercity bus services, 24 Human service organizations provide transportation to qualifying 55 along with two nonprofit providers. Three of the six private 25 clients to augment local public transportation services. To qualify, 56 providers support the national intercity bus network (Greyhound, 26 clientele typically meet some of the following criteria: over 65 years 57 Black Hills Stage Lines and Burlington Trailways), one is a rural 27 of age, veteran, low-income, or disabled. Nonprofit entities operate 58 feeder system (Village Tours-BeeLine Express), and two are 28 most of these services. 59 specialized intercity bus carriers that do not connect to the intercity 29 Privately operated public transportation includes resort bus and 60 bus network, but instead focus on direct point-to-point service from 30 shuttle operators, taxi services, intercity bus operations (e.g., 61 the US to Mexico (El Paso-Los Angeles Limousine Express and Los 31 Greyhound), and shuttle services. Each is available to the general 62 Paisanos Autobuses). The Chaffee Shuttle operates as a nonprofit 63 and provides service from Salida to Pueblo and operates the Page 41 1 Gunnison to Salida route for Black Hills Stage Lines. Southern Ute 4 Figure 4-2 shows the existing intercity bus routes in Colorado and 2 Community Action Programs is the other intercity nonprofit 5 Table 4-1 provides an overview of the existing intercity bus service 3 operator providing service between Durango and Grand Junction. 6 providers and current services. 7 Figure 4-1 Colorado Existing Transit (Bus and Rail) Services 8 Page 42 1 Figure 4-2 Existing Intercity Bus Routes 2 Page 43 1 Table 4-1 Existing Intercity Bus Services Provider Route Frequency Black Hills Stage Lines (wholly owned Denver – Omaha, NE One round-trip daily subsidiary of Arrow Stage Lines) . Colorado stops include Sterling and Fort Morgan Alamosa – Salida – Denver (plus one trip from Gunnison to Salida) One round-trip daily . Stops include Moffat, Poncha Springs, Buena Vista, Fairplay, and Pine Junction Denver – Greeley – Cheyenne, WY Two round-trips daily Burlington Trailways Denver – Indianapolis, IN One round-trip daily . Colorado stops include Sterling, Brush, and Fort Morgan Chaffee Shuttle (nonprofit) Salida – Cañon City - Pueblo One round-trip daily . Colorado stops include Howard/ Cotopaxi, Cañon City, Penrose, and Pueblo West Gunnison – Salida (operated for Black Hills Stage Lines) On round-trip daily Greyhound Lines Denver – Grand Junction – Las Vegas, NV Three round-trips daily Denver – Salt Lake City (via US 40) One round-trip daily . Colorado stops include Idaho Springs, Winter Park, Granby, Hot Sulphur Springs, Kremmling, Steamboat Springs, Milner, Hayden, Craig, and Dinosaur Denver – Colorado Springs – Pueblo . Service on to Rocky Ford, Lamar, and Springfield Five round-trips daily . Service on to Walsenburg and Trinidad Two round-trips daily . Amtrak Thruway bus service from Denver to Colorado One round-trip daily Springs, Pueblo, Raton, NM, and Albuquerque, NM Denver – Fort Collins – Salt Lake City – Portland (via I-25 and I-80) Two round-trips daily Denver – St.Louis – New York City Two round-trips daily Colorado stop in Burlington El Paso-Los Angeles Limousine Express, Inc. Greeley – New Mexico – Texas Three round-trips daily . Colorado stops include Denver, Colorado Springs, and Pueblo Greeley – Denver – Pueblo Two round-trips daily Page 44 Provider Route Frequency Los Paisanos Autobuses, Inc. Greeley – El Paso, TX Two round-trips daily . Colorado stops include Longmont and Denver Southern Ute Community Action Programs Durango – Grand Junction One round-trip daily (SUCAP) (nonprofit) . Stops include Mancos, Cortez, Dolores, Rico, Telluride, Placerville, Ridgway, Montrose and Delta Village Tours - BeeLine Express Pueblo – Wichita, KS One round-trip daily . Colorado stops include Fowler, Rocky Ford, La Junta, Las Animas, Lamar, and Granada 1 19 trips between Evergreen and Denver, 25 trips between 2 Regional Bus Service 20 Nederland and Boulder, 14 trips between Parker and 3 Regional bus service provides travel into urban areas and resort 21 Denver, 18 trips between Brighton and Denver, and 12 trips 4 communities, typically provides more frequent bus service each day 22 between Lyons and Boulder on typical weekdays. RTD 5 than intercity bus service, and operates with federal, state and/or 23 operates several SkyRide routes that connect DIA with 6 local funding assistance. Regional services can provide long- 24 areas throughout the Denver region. RTD’s regional routes 25 7 distance travel to access government services, medical trips or and SkyRide routes connect with intercity bus network 26 providers, including Greyhound, Black Hills Stage Lines, and 8 other destinations. They are typically scheduled to allow users to 27 Burlington Trailways. Detailed route and schedule 9 make a day trip and provide connections to the intercity bus 28 information can be found at RTD’s website. 10 network. 29 Eagle County Transit: ECO Transit operates regional 11 Thirteen providers offer regional bus service in Colorado (see 30 routes that travel along Highway 6, which parallels I-70 and 12 Figure 4-3): 31 serves Vail, Eagle-Vail, Avon/Beaver Creek, Edwards, Eagle, 13 Denver RTD: RTD provides a variety of “Regional” and 32 Eagle Regional Airport and Gypsum. During the winter, 16 14 “SkyRide” routes that operate across the Denver 33 daily round-trips are operated between Gypsum and Vail 15 metropolitan region. Approximately 76 regional trips 34 and 28 daily round-trips between Edwards and Vail with 16 operate between Denver and Boulder, 42 trips between 35 additional peak 17 Denver and Longmont, 90 trips between Boulder and 36 hour service. 18 Longmont, 25 trips between Pine Junction and Denver, 20 37 Regional service 38 also travels north- 39 south along 40 Highway 24 41 providing two daily 42 round-trips Page 45 1 connecting Leadville, Red Cliff, and Minturn to Vail and 36 Placerville and Telluride during the week. Detailed route 2 Avon. Detailed route and schedule information can be 37 and schedule information can be found at the Town of 3 found at Eagle County’s website. 38 Telluride’s website. 4 Transfort’s FLEX: FLEX is a regional route in northern 39 Grand Valley Transit: Grand Valley Transit provides local 5 Colorado serving Fort Collins, Loveland, Berthoud, and 40 and regional bus, 6 Longmont, where 41 dial-a-ride and 7 riders can connect 42 paratransit services 8 to RTD bus services 43 in the Grand Valley 9 to Denver and 44 (Mesa County) area. 10 Boulder. On 45 Two regional routes 11 weekdays, 18 46 provide service 12 round-trips are 47 between Grand 13 provided, including 48 Junction and Fruita 14 9 that serve 49 and Grand Junction 15 Longmont and 50 and Palisades. Route 16 Berthoud (others 51 8 travels to and from the Mesa Mall Transfer Station to 17 only connect Loveland and Fort Collins). On Saturdays, 14 52 Fruita with service from 4:45 am to 8:35 pm. Route 4 18 round-trips are provided, including 4 that serve Longmont 53 travels to and from the Clifton Transfer Station and 19 and Berthoud. Detailed route and schedule information can 54 Palisades with service from 4:45 am to 8:35 pm. Detailed 20 be found at Transfort’s website. 55 route and schedule information can be found at Grand 56 Valley Transit’s website.
Recommended publications
  • Transit Service Design Guidelines
    Transit Service Design Guidelines Department of Rail and Public Transportation November 2008 Transit Service Design Guidelines Why were these guidelines for new transit service developed? In FY2008 alone, six communities in Virginia contacted the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation about starting new transit service in their community. They and many other communities throughout Virginia are interested in learning how new transit services can enhance travel choices and mobility and help to achieve other goals, such as quality of life, economic opportunity, and environmental quality. They have heard about or seen successful transit systems in other parts of the state, the nation, or the world, and wonder how similar systems might serve their communities. They need objective and understandable information about transit and whether it might be appropriate for them. These guidelines will help local governments, transit providers and citizens better understand the types of transit systems and services that are available to meet community and regional transportation needs. The guidelines also help the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation (DRPT) in making recommendations to the Commonwealth Transportation Board for transit investments, by 1) providing information on the types of systems or services that are best matched to community needs and local land use decisions, and 2) ensuring that resources are used effectively to achieve local, regional, and Commonwealth goals. Who were these guidelines developed for? These guidelines are intended for three different audiences: local governments, transit providers and citizens. Therefore, some will choose to read the entire document while others may only be interested in certain sections.
    [Show full text]
  • Intercity Bus Program Section 5311 (F) Presented By: FTA Region 4 Staff Lorna Wilson, HQ Juan Morrison, HQ
    Federal Transit Administration Intercity Bus Program Section 5311 (f) Presented by: FTA Region 4 Staff Lorna Wilson, HQ Juan Morrison, HQ Federal Transit Administration OBJECTIVE Support the connection between nonurbanized areas and the larger regional or national system of intercity bus service. Support services to meet the intercity travel needs of residents in nonurbanized areas. Support the infrastructure of the intercity bus network through planning and marketing assistance and capital investment in facilities. FTA encourages States to use the funding under 49 U.S.C. 5311(f) to support these national objectives, as well as priorities determined by the State. FTA TPM ver3.1 2 GOVERNOR’S CERTIFICATION A State is required to expend at least 15 percent of its apportionment for an intercity bus program, unless “the chief executive officer of the State certifies to the Secretary of Transportation, after consultation with affected intercity bus service providers, that the intercity bus service needs of the State are being met adequately.” FTA TPM ver3.1 3 INTERCITY BUS The legislative history indicates that the assessment of intercity bus needs be made “relative to other rural needs in the State.” A State certifying that its needs are adequately met must demonstrate that it has assessed statewide intercity mobility needs no more than four years before the date of the certification The State must document in the State Management Plan (SMP) its consultation process and any process that it develops for periodically assessing statewide
    [Show full text]
  • Concord Coach (NH) O Dartmouth Coach (NH) O Peter Pan Bus Lines (MA)
    KFH GROUP, INC. 2012 Vermont Public Transit Policy Plan INTERCITY BUS NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND POLICY OPTIONS White Paper January, 2012 Prepared for the: State of Vermont Agency of Transportation 4920 Elm Street, Suite 350 —Bethesda, MD 20814 —(301) 951-8660—FAX (301) 951-0026 Table of Contents Page Chapter 1: Background and Policy Context......................................................................... 1-1 Policy Context...................................................................................................................... 1-1 Chapter 2: Inventory of Existing Intercity Passenger Services.......................................... 2-1 Intercity Bus......................................................................................................................... 2-1 Impacts of the Loss of Rural Intercity Bus Service......................................................... 2-8 Intercity Passenger Rail.................................................................................................... 2-11 Regional Transit Connections ......................................................................................... 2-11 Conclusions........................................................................................................................ 2-13 Chapter 3: Analysis of Intercity Bus Service Needs............................................................ 3-1 Demographic Analysis of Intercity Bus Needs............................................................... 3-1 Public Input on Transit Needs .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Development. Map OSAGE ST 36 83 Only Includes Renovations If the Building Changed Use
    T S A I N R O F I WASHINGTON ST L A C DOWNING ST DOWNING T S N E 25TH ST 25TH D G O COMMERCIAL MIXED-USE 39 SugarSquare 40 1 Block A/Hotel Born The Boathouse 41 24TH ST 2 The LAB Dairy Block HUMBOLDT ST E 42 V The Nichols Building A 3 H the ART, a hotel T 7 43 DOWNTOWN 1 4 Union Tower West Triangle Building E PARK AVE MARION ST RESIDENTIAL DOWNING ST ENTERTAINMENT + CULTURE FOX ST ARAPAHOE 44 1000 Speer 77 CPV 46 5 Denver Art Museum North Building 45 22ND ST SQUARE Alexan 20th Street Station PROSPECTHURON ST 6 Kirkland Museum T S T BALLPARK ST CALIFORNIA 46 E 53 TREMONT PL S S V PL GLENARM Alexan Arapahoe Square I ST WELTON 7 A 63 A T 59 Rocky Mountain PBS Media Center H 65 T 47 T R 4 T DENVER E Alta City House 3 INCA ST V U 68 OGDEN ST A 7 A C W R H W 21ST ST B D DEVELOPMENT MAP COORS R 48 T E CLARKSON ST AMLI Riverfront Green 9 O T 2 69 W A GOVERNMENT + N W FIELD D W WASHINGTON ST 49 O 55 AMLI Riverfront Park A EMERSON ST M 64 Y 45 E K V PENNSYLVANIA ST ACADEMIC INSTITUTIONS A 50 C Ascent Union Station H L O T 0 P R 2 8 67 20TH ST E AHEC 5th Street Parking Garage 51 Ashley Union Station T U 2013-2018 L 9 N O E 17TH AVE Community College of Denver 52 19 T 57 G Balfour at Riverfront Park S A N 49 E E 19TH AVE S Confluence 53 H T Broadstone Blake Street C 50 E 10 19TH T V CU Denver Wellness Center 54 ST 19TH ST 19TH S 11 A E 16TH PEARLAVE ST H Cadence Apartments T 8 11 Downtown Denver Expeditionary School 55 40 60 1 Curtis Street Lofts 47 51 2 66 E LARIMER ST LARIMER LAWRENCE ST LAWRENCE BLAKE ST BLAKE WAZEE ST WAZEE ARAPAHOE ST ARAPAHOE
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Denver Partnership, Inc
    STATE OF DOWNTOWN DENVER SEPTEMBER 2012 Downtown Denver Partnership, Inc. With support from: STATE OF 1 DOWNTOWN DENVER INTRODUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Letter .................................................1 Dear Downtown Denver Stakeholder, Key Facts ...............................................................2 Thank you for picking up a copy of the Downtown Denver Partnership’s annual State of Downtown Denver report, a fact-driven report that provides timely, Denver’s Downtown Area Plan ..............................3 objective and accurate data about Downtown Denver. This year we are proud Notable Rankings ..................................................4 to collaborate with Newmark Knight Frank Frederick Ross to bring you the most complete statistics and analysis about Downtown Denver. Office Market .................................................... 6-7 Employers & Employees ..................................... 8-9 In his 2012 State of the City address, Mayor Michael B. Hancock remarked that a vibrant downtown core is essential to the health of the city. At the 2012 Retail & Restaurants .............................................11 Rocky Mountain Urban Leadership Symposium, Governor Hickenlooper and Downtown Residents ..................................... 12-13 other leaders in the Rocky Mountain West stressed the importance of urban centers in creating strong place-based economies that attract and retain top Transportation ............................................... 14-15 talent. Downtown Denver is one
    [Show full text]
  • Trams Der Welt / Trams of the World 2020 Daten / Data © 2020 Peter Sohns Seite/Page 1 Algeria
    www.blickpunktstrab.net – Trams der Welt / Trams of the World 2020 Daten / Data © 2020 Peter Sohns Seite/Page 1 Algeria … Alger (Algier) … Metro … 1435 mm Algeria … Alger (Algier) … Tram (Electric) … 1435 mm Algeria … Constantine … Tram (Electric) … 1435 mm Algeria … Oran … Tram (Electric) … 1435 mm Algeria … Ouragla … Tram (Electric) … 1435 mm Algeria … Sétif … Tram (Electric) … 1435 mm Algeria … Sidi Bel Abbès … Tram (Electric) … 1435 mm Argentina … Buenos Aires, DF … Metro … 1435 mm Argentina … Buenos Aires, DF - Caballito … Heritage-Tram (Electric) … 1435 mm Argentina … Buenos Aires, DF - Lacroze (General Urquiza) … Interurban (Electric) … 1435 mm Argentina … Buenos Aires, DF - Premetro E … Tram (Electric) … 1435 mm Argentina … Buenos Aires, DF - Tren de la Costa … Tram (Electric) … 1435 mm Argentina … Córdoba, Córdoba … Trolleybus … Argentina … Mar del Plata, BA … Heritage-Tram (Electric) … 900 mm Argentina … Mendoza, Mendoza … Tram (Electric) … 1435 mm Argentina … Mendoza, Mendoza … Trolleybus … Argentina … Rosario, Santa Fé … Heritage-Tram (Electric) … 1435 mm Argentina … Rosario, Santa Fé … Trolleybus … Argentina … Valle Hermoso, Córdoba … Tram-Museum (Electric) … 600 mm Armenia … Yerevan … Metro … 1524 mm Armenia … Yerevan … Trolleybus … Australia … Adelaide, SA - Glenelg … Tram (Electric) … 1435 mm Australia … Ballarat, VIC … Heritage-Tram (Electric) … 1435 mm Australia … Bendigo, VIC … Heritage-Tram (Electric) … 1435 mm www.blickpunktstrab.net – Trams der Welt / Trams of the World 2020 Daten / Data © 2020 Peter Sohns Seite/Page
    [Show full text]
  • Intercity Bus Feeder Project Program Analysis
    Intercity Bus U.S. Department of Transportation Feeder Project Program Analysis September 1990 Intercity Bus Feeder Project Program Analysis Final Report September 1990 Prepared by Frederic D. Fravel, Elisabeth R. Hayes, and Kenneth I. Hosen Ecosometrics, Inc. 4715 Cordell Avenue Bethesda, Maryland 20814-3016 Prepared for Community Transportation Association of America 725 15th Street NW, Suite 900 Washington, D.C. 20005 Funded by Urban Mass Transportation Administration U.S. Department of Transportation 400 Seventh Street SW Washington, D.C. 20590 Distributed in Cooperation with Technology Sharing Program Research and Special Programs Administration U.S. Department of Transportation Washington, D.C. 20590 DOT-T-91-03 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE s uh4h4ARY . S-l Background and Purpose ............................................. S-l CurrentStatusoftheProgram ......................................... S-3 Identification of Participant Goals ....................................... S-3 Analysis of Participants .............................................. S-8 casestudies ...................................................... s-11 Program Costs and Benefits ........................................... S-l 1 Conclusions ...................................................... S-13 Goals and Objectives for the Rural Connection ............................. S-15 Identification of Potential Future Changes ................................. S-17 1 -- INTRODUCTION AND STATEMENT OFTHE PROBLEM . 1 BackgroundandPurpose.............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Intercity Buses the Forgotten Mode by Randal O’Toole
    No. 680 June 29, 2011 Intercity Buses The Forgotten Mode by Randal O’Toole Executive Summary The debate over President Obama’s fantasti- transportation mode, with ridership growing cally expensive high-speed rail program has ob- almost twice as fast as Amtrak. scured the resurgence of a directly competing Intercity buses carry at least 50 percent mode of transportation: intercity buses. Entre- more passenger miles than Amtrak in Amtrak’s preneurial immigrants from China and recently showcase Northeast Corridor. They do so with privatized British transportation companies almost no subsidies and at fares that are about have developed a new model for intercity bus a third of Amtrak’s regular train fares and little operations that provides travelers with faster more than 10 percent of Amtrak’s high-speed service at dramatically reduced fares. Acela fares. Intercity buses are safe and environ- New-model bus companies save money by mentally friendly, suffering almost 80 percent selling tickets over the Internet and loading fewer fatalities per billion passenger miles than and unloading passengers at curbsides rather Amtrak and using 60 percent less energy per than in expensive bus stations. They speed ser- passenger mile than Amtrak. vice by running most buses non-stop between Policymakers can encourage expansion of major cities rather than making numerous in- intercity bus services by ending subsidies to termediate stops. Some companies distinguish Amtrak and minimizing regulatory barriers to themselves from their competition by provid- new bus start-ups. Cities concerned about con- ing leather seats, free wireless Internet, more gestion and parking problems caused by curb- legroom, and—in a few cases—onboard meal side bus operations can sell curb rights—the service and movies.
    [Show full text]
  • 6.0 Transportation Impacts This Section Describes the Transportation Impacts Expected with the No‐Build and Build Alternatives
    Section TRANSPORTATION 6 IMPACTS 6. Transportation Impacts6. Transportation 6.0 Transportation Impacts This section describes the transportation impacts expected with the No‐Build and Build Alternatives. The Service Development Plan and expected travel benefits are presented. Year 2030 ridership projections and operating revenues for passenger rail service are presented for each alternative. Projected annual person trips for air, bus, and automobile intercity travel are also presented. In addition to the intercity passenger information, impacts to future freight and commuter rail operations and vehicular traffic are discussed, including impacts from construction and vehicular impacts associated with the changes proposed at the highway‐railroad at‐grade crossings in the corridor. 6.1 Service Development Plan In accordance with FRA High Speed Rail guidance referred to in 74 Fed. Reg. 29900 (June 23, 2009), this section outlines the Service Development Plan (SDP) for the potential improvements on the Chicago – St. Louis corridor described by this Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement. The following items are addressed within this subsection: Intercity travel options Service levels/frequencies Capital program needs Ridership/revenue forecasted, including number of passengers and boardings/disembarking at stations 6.1.1 Intercity Travel Options Intercity travel by auto, bus, and air represent alternative travel options to high‐speed intercity rail. Air travel offers the advantage of relatively shorter time in flight but further analysis shows that travel to the airport and time required to prepare for boarding add substantially to total trip time. The time advantage is diminished for trips under 500 miles and is reduced further for shorter trips. The private automobile offers extreme convenience with door‐to‐door service.
    [Show full text]
  • Denver Apartments
    Denver Apartments A 174-unit, LEED®-Gold, Mixed-Use, Multi-Family Apartment Building Denver, CO 80211 September 2013 PROPOSED LOAN TERMS Denver’s Cherry Creek Neighborhood A to-be-formed single-purpose entity Managing Member: Apartment Community Development, LLC Borrower Co-Managing Member : Denver Apartments, LLC (an open-ended Fund formed in 2004 with a gross asset value of $1 billion) Guarantors Apartment Community Development, LLC Completion Guaranty provided by Guarantors. Requesting quotes for the Partial Repayment Guaranty being provided by: Guarantee - Guarantors only - Guarantors and Denver Apartments, LLC. Commitment Date October 7, 2013 Up to 75 percent loan-to-cost Loan-to-Cost Up to $44,000,000 Loan Amount First, for the recapitalization of the borrower after the acquisition of the land in an amount of 75 percent loan to cost. Second, for the construction Loan Purpose of the improvements. Vertical construction shall commence on or about December 2013 - January 2014. December 1st, 2013 Loan Closing Construction Substantial Completion: 20 months Period Either a: 1. Five-year total term (3+1+1) Term 2. Twelve- (12) year construction/perm loan with maximum interest only flexibility. Best rate available. Interest Rate Most competitive percentage possible. Lender Fees Prepayment No pre-payment penalty at any time Penalty Lender Memorandum Page 3 1 Project Summary 4 1.1 Overview 4 1.2 Project Schedule 7 1.3 Building Program 7 2 Financials 10 2.1 Capital Structure 10 2.2 Project Income and Expenses 13 2.3 Project Budget 15 3 Market
    [Show full text]
  • 16.0 Intercity Travel
    16.0 INTERCITY TRAVEL In addition to daily travel within the region, many Kansas City area residents travel to other regional and national destinations. While the automobile is the most common transportation mode for those traveling from place to place within the region, other modes are often used for intercity travel. Understanding the Kansas City region’s connections to other metropolitan areas by bus, rail, air and automobile will help people make informed decisions about travel options. An efficient transportation network with strong intercity connections helps promote the economic vitality of the region by providing businesses with access to external markets and attracting visitors to the region. Intercity connections The Kansas City region’s geographic location is near the center of the contiguous United States. Kansas City is near seven other major metropolitan areas, including the major transportation hubs of Chicago, Dallas-Fort Worth, Minneapolis-St. Paul and Memphis. Intercity travel was examined using a 550-mile radius from Downtown Kansas City, Missouri. This radius is commonly used to define one- day travel, or about an eight-hour driving distance. Two other major metropolitan areas — Denver and Milwaukee — were also included in the intercity travel analysis, as Kansas City has direct connections to Denver, and Milwaukee is just outside the 550-mile radius. Within the radius, 44 cities and metropolitan areas are identified as “connected” to theDRAFT Kansas City metro area, either directly or with one to two connections/layovers when traveling by auto, bus, rail or airplane. These 44 cities comprise a population of just over 43 million. 16.0 Intercity Travel l Transportation Outlook 2040 16.1 2015 Update Figure 15.6: One-day travel intercity radius This chapter examines travel information using a 550‐mile Minneapolis radius from Downtown Kansas City, Milwaukee Madison Missouri.
    [Show full text]
  • DENVER UNION STATION Master Plan September 2004
    DENVER UNION STATION Master Plan September 2004 PART I Introduction 2 Introduction Dear Fellow Citizens and Interested Readers: Denver Union Station’s unique assets make it an ideal The Master Plan is one of several major initiatives location for this new type of multimodal transportation needed to advance the redevelopment. The Denver We proudly present the Denver Union Station facility. Denver Union Station will create an exciting Planning Board has reviewed the Master Plan as the fi rst Master Plan. This document was developed through transportation crossroads, improving connections step toward City Council adoption as a supplement to an unprecedented collaboration among four public among all transportation modes, respecting the character the City and County of Denver’s Comprehensive Plan. agencies – the City and County of Denver, the and historical signifi cance of this handsome station and Concurrent with the adoption of the Master Plan, City Colorado Department of Transportation, the Denver its adjacent neighborhoods, and providing a stimulating Council will be asked to rezone the 19.5-acre Denver Regional Council of Governments, and the Regional environment for public activity and economic vitality. Union Station site as a new Transit Mixed-Use (T-MU- Transportation District – along with many organizations 30) District and designate the building and a portion of and individuals in the community and the region. Their Focusing on transportation and connectivity, the Master the site as a historic landmark in the City and County of participation, strong support, and donation of countless Plan identifi es and evaluates potential transportation, Denver. hours of their time were essential to this project.
    [Show full text]