Table of Contents
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Insider's Guidetoazpolitics
olitics e to AZ P Insider’s Guid Political lists ARIZONA NEWS SERVICE ARIZONA CAPITOL TIMES • Arizona Capitol Reports FEATURING PROFILES of Arizona’s legislative & congressional districts, consultants & public policy advocates Statistical Trends The chicken Or the egg? WE’RE EXPERTS AT GETTING POLICY MAKERS TO SEE YOUR SIDE OF THE ISSUE. R&R Partners has a proven track record of using the combined power of lobbying, public relations and advertising experience to change both minds and policy. The political environment is dynamic and it takes a comprehensive approach to reach the right audience at the right time. With more than 50 years of combined experience, we’ve been helping our clients win, regardless of the political landscape. Find out what we can do for you. Call Jim Norton at 602-263-0086 or visit us at www.rrpartners.com. JIM NORTON JEFF GRAY KELSEY LUNDY STUART LUTHER 101 N. FIRST AVE., STE. 2900 Government & Deputy Director Deputy Director Government & Phoenix, AZ 85003 Public Affairs of Client Services of Client Public Affairs Director Development Associate CONTENTS Politics e to AZ ARIZONA NEWS SERVICE Insider’s Guid Political lists STAFF CONTACTS 04 ARIZONA NEWS SERVICE BEATING THE POLITICAL LEGISLATIVE Administration ODDS CONSULTANTS, DISTRICT Vice President & Publisher: ARIZONA CAPITOL TIMES • Arizona Capitol Reports Ginger L. Lamb Arizonans show PUBLIC POLICY PROFILES Business Manager: FEATURING PROFILES of Arizona’s legislative & congressional districts, consultants & public policy advocates they have ‘the juice’ ADVOCATES, -
Citizens Clean Elections Commission VOT
Citizens Clean Elections Commission VOT 2006 Statewide and Legislative Candidate Statements Primary Election Citizens Clean Elections Commission Voter Education Guide Paid for by the Citizens Clean Elections Fund Table of Contents Letter from the Commission 2 Disclaimer 3 Election Dates 4 Alternative Formats 4 Help America Vote Act of 2002 4 General Voting Information 4 What is My Legislative District? 5-6 Arizona’s Citizens Clean Elections Act 7 The Citizens Clean Elections Commission 8 Contact the Commission 9 Citizens Clean Elections Commissioners 9 Citizens Clean Elections Commission Staff 9 Citizens Clean Elections Fund 10 Tax Credits 10 Candidate Statements 11-106 Candidate Statement Pamphlet Primary Election Letter from the Commission Dear Arizona Voters: The year 2006 is a major election year in Arizona. By voting in the Primary and General Elections this fall, you will be electing candidates for 7 statewide offices and 90 legislative seats consisting of 30 Senators and 60 Representatives. This Candidate Statement Pamphlet is a nonpartisan, plain-language handbook published by the Citizens Clean Elections Commission, an independent state agency, to give you information about state elections. The Commission’s mission is to fairly, faithfully and fully implement and administer Arizona’s Citizens Clean Elections Act, which is a campaign finance reform measure initiated by Arizona citizens and passed by voters in 1998. The Act creates a new campaign financing system that provides full public funding to qualified state and legislative office candidates who agree to abide by the Citizens Clean Elections Act and Commis- sion regulations. Through the successful implementation of the Citizens Clean Elections Act, the Commission seeks to promote public confidence in the electoral process. -
2006 Voters Guide
Election Season 2006 The Catholic Sun ◆ Page 1 2006 Voters Guide Arizona Catholic Conference Diocese of Gallup ◆ Diocese of Phoenix ◆ Diocese of Tucson he Arizona Catholic Conference (ACC) is the public policy arm Tof the Diocese of Phoenix, the Diocese of Tucson, and the Diocese of Gallup. We have produced this 2006 ACC Voters Guide as an important educational tool to provide unbiased information on the upcoming elections. Pursuant to Internal Revenue Service requirements legislative district. Each legislative district includes for churches and nonprofit organizations, this doc- one State Senator and two State Representatives. ument does not endorse candidates or indicate our To find the legislative district you live in, please visit support or opposition to the questions. The Voters www.azcatholicconference.org. Guide, however, is an excellent source of informa- While the 2006 Voters Guide will reach hundreds tion on the candidates’ positions on current issues. of thousands of people, you are encouraged to Included in this guide are races covering the U.S. Senate, U.S. Congress, Arizona Governor, reproduce this material and distribute it in your Secretary of State, Attorney General, Treasurer, churches. Please take time to review this guide and Corporation Commission, State Senate and State remember to visit www.azcatholicconference.org to House. It is important to remember that members sign up for legislative alerts and to keep up on the of the State Senate and State House are elected by latest information. This 2006 Voters Guide was produced by the Arizona Catholic Conference and The Catholic Sun, newspaper of the Diocese of Phoenix. www.azcatholicconference.org Page 2 ◆ The Catholic Sun votersguide Election Season 2006 n June, candidates running I for office were presented with a series of 12 statements and Arizona Catholic Conference 2006 Voters Guide asked to identify whether or not they Supported or Opposed them. -
Election 2006
APPENDIX: CANDIDATE PROFILES BY STATE We analyzed the fair trade positions of candidates in each race that the Cook Political Report categorized as in play. In the profiles below, race winners are denoted by a check mark. Winners who are fair traders are highlighted in blue text. Alabama – no competitive races___________________________________________ Alaska_________________________________________________________________ Governor OPEN SEAT – incumbent Frank Murkowski (R) lost in primary and was anti-fair trade. As senator, Murkowski had a 100% anti-fair trade voting record. 9 GOP Sarah Palin’s trade position is unknown. • Democratic challenger Tony Knowles is a fair trader. In 2004, Knowles ran against Lisa Murkowski for Senate and attacked her for voting for NAFTA-style trade deals while in the Senate, and for accepting campaign contributions from companies that off-shore jobs.1 Arizona________________________________________________________________ Senate: Incumbent GOP Sen. Jon Kyl. 9 Kyl is anti-fair trade. Has a 100% anti-fair trade record. • Jim Pederson (D) is a fair trader. Pederson came out attacking Kyl’s bad trade record in closing week of campaign, deciding to make off-shoring the closing issue. On Nov. 3 campaign statement: “Kyl has repeatedly voted for tax breaks for companies that ship jobs overseas, and he has voted against a measure that prohibited outsourcing of work done under federally funded contracts,” said Pederson spokesman Kevin Griffis, who added that Pederson “wants more protections [in trade pacts] related to child labor rules and environmental safeguards to help protect U.S. jobs.”2 House Arizona 1: GOP Rep. Rick Renzi incumbent 9 Renzi is anti-fair trade. 100% bad trade vote record. -
Introduction
IMMIGRATION_Ch01.qxd 21/11/07 4:43 PM Page 1 Chapter 1 Introduction “America, at its best, is a welcoming society. We welcome not only immigrants themselves but the many gifts they bring and the values they live by.” So said President George W. Bush at a naturalization ceremony for new citizens at Ellis Island in July 2001. The fifty million immigrants admitted legally to the United States in the twentieth century alone lends substantial credibility to Bush’s words and to the old adage that “America is a nation of immigrants.” Indeed, immi- grants seeking their freedom and fortune and fulfilling the American dream have become part of the nation’s mythology. No symbol of this is more potent than the Statue of Liberty and no words more poignant than those of Emmas Lazarus inscribed upon it: Give me your tired, your poor. Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free The wretched refuse of your teaming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door! And yet the history of immigration to the United States is far from unambiguously positive, as Bush’s “at its best” caveat recognizes. His qualification implies that Americans have ambivalent attitudes towards immigrants and immigration and that the broadly positive welcome afforded immigrants has been punctuated by a series of anti-immigrant episodes throughout American history. Many potential immigrants have been refused entry and many new immigrants persecuted because of their skin color or religion. Others have been excluded because the resident population decided they burdened schools, hospitals, and welfare rolls, because they took the jobs of native-born workers, and because they avoided taxes. -
State of Arizona Official Canvass
Report Date/Time: 09/25/2006 04:25 PM STATE OF ARIZONA OFFICIAL CANVASS Page Number 1 Revised 2006 Primary Election - September 12, 2006 Compiled and Issued by the Arizona Secretary of State Apache Cochise Coconino Gila Graham Greenlee La Paz Maricopa Mohave Navajo Pima Pinal Santa Cruz Yavapai Yuma TOTAL REGISTRATION Democratic (DEM) 24,406 19,241 25,510 13,161 7,149 2,831 2,447 442,498 24,363 25,301 164,446 36,319 12,147 24,424 23,247 847,490 Libertarian (LBT) 103 208 620 120 38 11 17 10,049 347 192 3,243 477 137 638 329 16,529 Republican (REP) 5,945 22,750 17,884 10,249 5,140 854 2,623 638,383 38,257 18,241 138,395 33,542 4,374 47,482 19,858 1,003,977 Others 7,438 14,066 18,882 5,517 2,281 497 1,765 390,996 25,077 12,165 114,770 26,318 5,102 27,039 13,399 665,312 Total Eligible Registration 37,892 56,265 62,896 29,047 14,608 4,193 6,852 1,481,926 88,044 55,899 420,854 96,656 21,760 99,583 56,833 2,533,308 BALLOTS CAST Democratic (DEM) 4,803 10,173 8,619 4,221 1,534 1,153 741 102,505 6,827 6,294 68,539 12,549 2,973 9,431 6,514 246,876 Libertarian (LBT) 55 169 185 52 14 0 30 1,934 293 103 637 187 21 263 103 4,046 Republican (REP) 1,540 11,019 6,163 4,611 1,694 279 1,090 187,195 14,393 5,189 60,201 10,575 1,204 21,647 6,804 333,604 Total Ballots Cast 6,398 21,361 14,967 8,884 3,242 1,432 1,861 291,634 21,513 11,586 129,377 23,311 4,198 31,341 13,421 584,526 PERCENT TURNOUT Total Voter Turnout Percent 16.88 37.96 23.80 30.58 22.19 34.15 27.16 19.68 24.43 20.73 30.74 24.12 19.29 31.47 23.61 23.07 PRECINCTS 45 64 85 39 18 8 12 1,142 73 70 409 74 24 104 42 2,209 U.S. -
Congressional Elections: a Political Turning Point? Social Education Staff
Social Education 70(6), pp. 382–386 ©2006 National Council for the Social Studies Congressional Elections: A Political Turning Point? Social Education Staff The Democrats have their best chance in 10 years to when national issues are on everybody’s mind. During the summer, make major gains in the congressional elections on November the approval rating of President Bush ranged between 33% and 7, while Republicans are striving to retain control of both the 42% in the different opinion polls. One of the issues identified by House and the Senate. For Republicans to lose control of both Americans as especially important was the war in Iraq, closely houses of the legislature, the Democrats need net gains of 15 identified with Bush, which the majority of Americans believe House seats and 6 Senate seats. was a mistake to start. The elections are taking place against a backdrop of dimin- In general, when a president’s approval rating is below 50%, that ishing confidence in the performance of Congress. Corruption spells potential trouble for his party in congressional elections. scandals, pork barrel politics, perceptions that politicians are The fact that the U.S. economy has grown at a good pace too beholden to lobbies and political donors, and a widespread would normally be positive for an incumbent party. Despite public belief that the country is heading in the wrong direction, economic growth, however, most Americans do not seem combined to give Congress unusually high disapproval rat- to believe that the economy is heading in the right direc- ings in polls taken this summer. -
Download/SWQ Standards-1-09- Unofficial.Pdf
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Final Environmental Southwestern Region Impact Statement for MB-R3-05-6c December 2013 the Rosemont Copper Project A Proposed Mining Operation Coronado National Forest Pima County, Arizona Volume 4 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Printed on recycled paper – December 2013 Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project Coronado National Forest Pima County, Arizona Lead Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Cooperating Agencies: Bureau of Land Management, National Park Service, Saguaro National Park, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory – Fred Lawrence Whipple Observatory, -
The Transformation of the Republican and Democratic Party Coalitions in the U.S
| | ⅜ Articles The Transformation of the Republican and Democratic Party Coalitions in the U.S. Gary Miller and Norman Schofield Because the space of policies is two-dimensional, parties in the United States are coalitions of opposed interests. The Republican Party contains both socially conservative and socially liberal groups, though both tend to be pro-business.The increasing dominance of the social conservatives has angered some prominent Republicans, even causing a number of them to change party allegiance. Over time, the decreasing significance of the economic axis may cause the Republican Party to adopt policies that are analogous to those proposed by William Jennings Bryan in 1896: populist and anti-business. In parallel, the Democratic Party will increasingly appeal to pro-business, social liberals, so the party takes on the mantel of Lincoln. “ his referendum has the potential to rip our party the Republican and Democratic parties? An article by Miller apart,” said Missouri Republican Kenny Hulshof, and Schofield has argued that the two-dimensional nature Tspeaking of a ballot measure that would constitu- of American politics guarantees long-run instability in the tionally guarantee the right to conduct stem cell research.1 U.S. party system.2 The measure is strongly supported by the leading busi- Any given winning coalitional basis for a party must ⅜ nesses and by their pro-business Republican allies. How- inevitably generate possibilities for the losers, by appeal- ever, it is even more vehemently opposed by the social ing to pivotal groups on one dimension or another. conservative wing of the Missouri Republican party, who Americans have strong feelings about economic regard stem cell research as tantamount to abortion. -
County Election Directors
S A MESSAGE TO ARIZONA VOTERS 3 3 33 ation sos.gov egistered www.azsos.gov www.azsos.gov www.azsos.gov General ElectionGeneralon ElectionGeneralon General ElectionGeneralon ElectionGeneralon . For information. For about October 4 October 4 October 4 October 4 General Election~ November 2,2010 does and arguments for and against the . t. to receivea the to ballot in mail,request or to that use. s s office. A list of contact information for each . Arizona be. conductingwill a he ballot (pages 110-135). ar on the ballot, includingthe actual language of the registered to vote: registered to vote: registered to vote: ns November 2. State and local elections will be registered to vote: rizona Commission on Judicial Performance Review, to rizonaCommissionJudicial onPerformance Review, articipate in this importantElection. iving overseas, you can find important voting inform or visit the Secretary of State’s – Website www.az . This is the period when early ballots are mailed to r Ken Bennett Ken Arizona Secretary of State Sincerely, Sincerely, . Polling places are open from 6 a.m. - 7 p.m. Issued theby Arizona Secretary ofOffice State’s A Message to Arizona Voters November 2 November 2 November 2 November 2 October October 7 7 - - October October 22 22 October October 7 7 - - October October 22 22 2010 General Election Publicity Pamphlet 2010 , and I hope this pamphletis a helpful your tool for measure followed by a description of what the measure measure filed membersby of the public (pages 17-109) assist you in reviewing the judges whowill be on t your registration, please call your County Recorder’ CountyRecorder can be found on page 12. -
ANNUAL SECURITY and FIRE SAFETY REPORT December 31St, 2020 Statistics for the 2019 Calendar Year
2019 Chief John Hoebee ANNUAL SECURITY AND FIRE SAFETY REPORT December 31st, 2020 Statistics for the 2019 Calendar Year Table of Content Page Message from the Department of Campus Safety 2 Background of Arizona Christian University 3 Clery Act Background 8 How This Report is Prepared 9 Disclosure of Crime Statistics 9 Policy (Record Collection, Information Dissemination, Sex-Offender Notification) 11 Crime Reporting Geographic Area 13 Department of Campus Safety Overview 14 Reporting Authorities 15 Security and Access to Buildings 15 Safety and Crime Prevention 16 Weapons, Criminal Convictions 18 Reporting Crimes and Requesting Assistance 20 Mass Notification Emergency Communications 21 Campus Safety Services & Timely Warnings 22 Emergency Response and Evacuation Procedures 23 Missing Student, Notification 24 Employee Education, Training, Lost and Found 25 Clery Act Crimes and Definitions 26 Title IX 30 Alcohol and Drug Policy 32 Counseling 38 Domestic Violence Victim Assistance and Resources 38 Victims’ Rights 40 Student Code of Conduct/ Disciplinary Procedures/ 42 Anti-Harassment Policy and Procedures Bullying 45 Hazing, Hate Crimes 46 Pets, Disorderly Conduct, Physical Conflict, Prohibited Items on Campus 47 Quiet Hours, Social Media Incidents 48 Reporting Student Code of Conduct Violations 49 Student Conduct Process 49 Code of Conduct Appeal Process 54 Self-Harm Policy 55 Crisis Response to Suicides and Attempts Suicides 56 Workplace Violence, Prohibited Conduct, Procedures Reporting a Threat 57 Fire Safety & University Housing Fire -
Official Election Canvass of Results
Report Date/Time: 09/20/2004 01:59 PM STATE OF ARIZONA OFFICIAL CANVASS Page Number 1 2004 Primary Election - September 7, 2004 Compiled and Issued by the Arizona Secretary of State Apache Cochise Coconino Gila Graham Greenlee La Paz Maricopa Mohave Navajo Pima Pinal Santa Cruz Yavapai Yuma TOTAL REGISTRATION Democratic (DEM) 25,422 21,490 26,692 12,464 7,242 3,156 2,590 453,701 25,626 24,801 162,573 34,883 11,360 23,316 20,759 856,075 Libertarian (LBT) 107 217 534 87 28 13 13 10,925 303 167 3,646 408 110 702 169 17,429 Republican (REP) 6,104 21,336 18,371 8,463 4,761 872 2,667 634,052 38,367 17,769 132,554 26,438 3,966 43,598 16,962 976,280 Others 6,444 11,971 19,901 3,846 1,943 369 1,555 352,942 22,498 10,764 102,332 19,202 3,896 23,301 9,396 590,360 Total Eligible Registration 38,077 55,014 65,498 24,860 13,974 4,410 6,825 1,451,620 86,794 53,501 401,105 80,931 19,332 90,917 47,286 2,440,144 BALLOTS CAST Democratic (DEM) 10,248 8,237 9,413 5,400 3,600 1,978 861 93,041 6,209 6,483 42,997 11,154 4,341 7,708 8,003 219,673 Libertarian (LBT) 90 114 93 37 13 1 10 1,722 167 127 520 107 23 193 92 3,309 Republican (REP) 1,884 10,801 4,146 4,010 2,365 360 1,504 236,928 17,303 5,040 57,097 8,033 1,320 22,047 7,068 379,906 Total Ballots Cast 12,222 19,152 13,652 9,447 5,978 2,339 2,375 331,691 23,679 11,650 100,614 19,294 5,684 29,948 15,163 602,888 PERCENT TURNOUT Total Voter Turnout Percent 32.10 34.81 20.84 38.00 42.78 53.04 34.80 22.85 27.28 21.78 25.08 23.84 29.40 32.94 32.07 24.71 PRECINCTS 45 64 83 40 18 8 12 1,058 73 70 401 67 24 104 42 2,109 U.S.