DOCSLIB.ORG

2006 Voters Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Election Season 2006 The Catholic Sun ◆ Page 1 2006 Voters Guide Arizona Catholic Conference Diocese of Gallup ◆ Diocese of Phoenix ◆ Diocese of Tucson he Arizona Catholic Conference (ACC) is the public policy arm Tof the Diocese of Phoenix, the Diocese of Tucson, and the Diocese of Gallup. We have produced this 2006 ACC Voters Guide as an important educational tool to provide unbiased information on the upcoming elections. Pursuant to Internal Revenue Service requirements legislative district. Each legislative district includes for churches and nonprofit organizations, this doc- one State Senator and two State Representatives. ument does not endorse candidates or indicate our To find the legislative district you live in, please visit support or opposition to the questions. The Voters www.azcatholicconference.org. Guide, however, is an excellent source of informa- While the 2006 Voters Guide will reach hundreds tion on the candidates’ positions on current issues. of thousands of people, you are encouraged to Included in this guide are races covering the U.S. Senate, U.S. Congress, Arizona Governor, reproduce this material and distribute it in your Secretary of State, Attorney General, Treasurer, churches. Please take time to review this guide and Corporation Commission, State Senate and State remember to visit www.azcatholicconference.org to House. It is important to remember that members sign up for legislative alerts and to keep up on the of the State Senate and State House are elected by latest information. This 2006 Voters Guide was produced by the Arizona Catholic Conference and The Catholic Sun, newspaper of the Diocese of Phoenix. www.azcatholicconference.org Page 2 ◆ The Catholic Sun votersguide Election Season 2006 n June, candidates running I for office were presented with a series of 12 statements and Arizona Catholic Conference 2006 Voters Guide asked to identify whether or not they Supported or Opposed them. U.S. Senate Some candidates chose not to NAME PARTY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 answer the survey while others Jim Pederson D Candidate did not answer survey took time to elaborate on their Richard Mack* L S S O - O O* S S O O S S answers (*). Jon Kyl* R S S O * S S S * O O S S ANSWER KEY U.S. House of Representatives S = Supports O = Opposes DIST. NAME PARTY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 — = No answer 1 Ellen Simon D Candidate did not answer survey * = Elaborated on answer 1 David Schlosser* L S* O* O* O* S* O* O* S* O* O* O* S* *** = Winner not determined at 1 Rick Renzi R S S O O O S S S O O S S time of printing 2 John Thrasher D Candidate did not answer survey For the most current candidate 2 Powell Gammill* L * * * * * * * * * * * * information available, visit 2 Trent Franks* R S S O O S S S S * O S S www.azcatholicconference.org. 3 Herb Paine*** D Candidate did not answer survey PARTY KEY 3 Don Chilton*** D Candidate did not answer survey D = Democrat 3 Mark Yannone L S O S S O O O O O O S S 3 John Shadegg R S S O O S S S O O O S S R = Republican I = Independent 4 Ed Pastor D Candidate did not answer survey L = Libertarian 4 Ronald Harders L Candidate did not answer survey 4 Don Karg* R S O O O S * S S* O O S S 1. Allowing parents to use tax credits, vouchers, or education 5 Harry Mitchell D Candidate did not answer survey savings accounts to enable 5 Warren Severin* L S O* O O O O O S* O O S O children to attend any public, 5 J. D. Hayworth* R S S O * S S S O S O S S private, or home school. 2. Prohibiting all forms of human 6 Jason Blair L Candidate did not answer survey cloning. 6 Jeff Flake R Candidate did not answer survey 3. Legalizing physician-assisted suicide. 7 Raul M. Grijalva D O S S O O O O S O S O S 4. Excluding newborn children 7 Joe Cobb* L S S S S O O O S O O S S conceived while their mothers 7 Ron Drake R S S O S S S S O O S S S were receiving welfare from the calculation of the family’s wel- 8 Gabrielle Giffords D Candidate did not answer survey fare cash grant. 8 David F. Nolan L S O S S - O O S O O S S 5. Prohibiting state and local 8 Randy Graf R S S O S S S S S O O S S government agencies, includ- 8 Jay Quick I Candidate did not answer survey ing police departments, from accepting matricula consular cards as a form of identification. 6. Amending the United States Governor Constitution to define marriage NAME PARTY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 as the union of one man and one woman. Janet Napolitano D Candidate did not answer survey Barry J. “Hess, II*” L S* S* O* * * * S* S* O* O* S* * 7. Requiring informed consent for Len Munsil R S S O O S S S S O O S S abortion to inform a woman con- sidering an abortion about the medical and psychological risks, Secretary of State fetal development, and abortion NAME PARTY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 alternatives, and to include a 24-hour period for the woman to Israel Torres D Candidate did not answer survey review the information. Ernest Hancock L Candidate did not answer survey 8. Establishing and maintaining Jan Brewer R S S O O S S S O S O S S a statewide public defender’s office to provide adequate legal Attorney General representation to those facing the death penalty. NAME PARTY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 9. Making the presence of undoc- Terry Goddard D Candidate did not answer survey umented immigrants in Arizona Bill Montgomery R S S O O S S S S O O S S a felony. 10. Mandating healthcare provid- ers to facilitate the distribution Treasurer of “emergency contraception” NAME PARTY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 (i.e., morning after pills). Rano Singh D Candidate did not answer survey 11. Exempting nonprofit religious Dean Martin* R S S O O S* S S O S O S S organizations from any con- traceptive mandates that may violate the tenets of their faith. Corporation Commission 12. Simplifying the existing tax NAME PARTY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 credit for donations made to nonprofit charitable organiza- Richard Boyer D Candidate did not answer survey tions serving the working poor Mark Manoil D Candidate did not answer survey so that people who do not Rick Fowlkes L S O S S O O O O O O S S itemize their taxes are eligible Kris Mayes R Candidate did not answer survey to participate. Gary Pierce R S S O O S S S S - O S S Election Season 2006 votersguide The Catholic Sun ◆ Page 3 State Senate n June, candidates running I for office were presented with DIS T. NAME PARTY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 a series of 12 statements and 1 Jo Kelleher D Candidate did not answer survey asked to identify whether or not 1 Terry Dunn L Candidate did not answer survey they Supported or Opposed 1 Tom O’Halleran* R O S O O O S S* S O O S S them. 2 Albert Hale D Candidate did not answer survey Some candidates chose not to 2 Royce Jenkins R Candidate did not answer survey 2 Mark Haughwout* I S* S O * S S* S O O O S S* answer the survey while others took time to elaborate on their 3 Noah Harris D Candidate did not answer survey answers (*). 3 Ron Gould R Candidate did not answer survey 4 Ed Gogek D Candidate did not answer survey ANSWER KEY 4 Jack Harper R S S O - S S S - S O S - S = Supports 5 Phil Cobb* D * O O O S O S S O S S S 5 Jake Flake R S S O O S S S S O O S S O = Opposes 6 Jim Larson D Candidate did not answer survey — = No answer 6 Pamela Gorman R S S O S S S S - S O S S * = Elaborated on answer 7 Lisa Black D Candidate did not answer survey *** = Winner not determined at 7 Jim Waring R Candidate did not answer survey time of printing 8 Dan Oseran D Candidate did not answer survey 8 Carolyn S. Allen R Candidate did not answer survey For the most current candidate 9 Steve Poe D Candidate did not answer survey information available, visit 9 Robert Burns R S S O S - S S - S O S S www.azcatholicconference.org. 10 Martin James D * S O O * * S S O O S S* Monroe* 10 Linda Gray R S S O S - S S S S O S S PARTY KEY 11 Ann Wallack D Candidate did not answer survey D = Democrat 11 Barbara Leff R S S O O S S S S S O S S R = Republican 12 Robert Blendu R S S O S S S S O S O S S I = Independent 13 Richard Miranda D Candidate did not answer survey L = Libertarian 14 Debbie D Candidate did not answer survey McCune-Davis 1.
Recommended publications
  • Insider's Guidetoazpolitics

    Insider's Guidetoazpolitics

    olitics e to AZ P Insider’s Guid Political lists ARIZONA NEWS SERVICE ARIZONA CAPITOL TIMES • Arizona Capitol Reports FEATURING PROFILES of Arizona’s legislative & congressional districts, consultants & public policy advocates Statistical Trends The chicken Or the egg? WE’RE EXPERTS AT GETTING POLICY MAKERS TO SEE YOUR SIDE OF THE ISSUE. R&R Partners has a proven track record of using the combined power of lobbying, public relations and advertising experience to change both minds and policy. The political environment is dynamic and it takes a comprehensive approach to reach the right audience at the right time. With more than 50 years of combined experience, we’ve been helping our clients win, regardless of the political landscape. Find out what we can do for you. Call Jim Norton at 602-263-0086 or visit us at www.rrpartners.com. JIM NORTON JEFF GRAY KELSEY LUNDY STUART LUTHER 101 N. FIRST AVE., STE. 2900 Government & Deputy Director Deputy Director Government & Phoenix, AZ 85003 Public Affairs of Client Services of Client Public Affairs Director Development Associate CONTENTS Politics e to AZ ARIZONA NEWS SERVICE Insider’s Guid Political lists STAFF CONTACTS 04 ARIZONA NEWS SERVICE BEATING THE POLITICAL LEGISLATIVE Administration ODDS CONSULTANTS, DISTRICT Vice President & Publisher: ARIZONA CAPITOL TIMES • Arizona Capitol Reports Ginger L. Lamb Arizonans show PUBLIC POLICY PROFILES Business Manager: FEATURING PROFILES of Arizona’s legislative & congressional districts, consultants & public policy advocates they have ‘the juice’ ADVOCATES,
  • Superior Court of Arizona Maricopa County Cv 2020

    Superior Court of Arizona Maricopa County Cv 2020

    Clerk of the Superior Court *** Filed *** SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY CV 2020-016840 02/25/2021 CLERK OF THE COURT HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. THOMASON N. Johnson Deputy MARICOPA COUNTY, et al. STEPHEN W TULLY v. KAREN FANN, et al. THOMAS J. BASILE JAMES E BARTON II JOHN A DORAN THOMAS PURCELL LIDDY JOSEPH EUGENE LA RUE JOSEPH J BRANCO EMILY M CRAIGER KORY A LANGHOFER JACQUELINE MENDEZ SOTO GREGREY G JERNIGAN COURT ADMIN-CIVIL-ARB DESK DOCKET-CIVIL-CCC JUDGE THOMASON MINUTE ENTRY East Court Building – Courtroom 713 9:03 a.m. This is the time set for Oral Argument on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment, filed February 22, 2021, President Fann and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Petersen’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, filed February 22, 2021, and Democratic Senators’ Motion for Summary Judgment, filed February 22, 2021 via Court Connect. All appearances are virtual and are as follows: Docket Code 901 Form V000A Page 1 SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY CV 2020-016840 02/25/2021 Counsel, Stephen W. Tully, John A. Doran, Thomas P. Liddy, Joseph J. Branco, Joseph E. LaRue, and Emily Craiger are present on behalf of Plaintiffs/Defendants- in-Counterclaim Maricopa County; Clint Hickman, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors; and Jack Sellers, Steve Chucri, Bill Gates, and Steve Gallardo, in their official capacities as Members of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, who are not present. Counsel, Thomas Basile and Kory Langhofer are present on behalf of Defendants/Plaintiffs-in-Counterclaim Arizona Senate President Karen Fann, who is present, and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Eddie Farnsworth, who is not present.
  • Citizens Clean Elections Commission VOT

    Citizens Clean Elections Commission VOT

    Citizens Clean Elections Commission VOT 2006 Statewide and Legislative Candidate Statements Primary Election Citizens Clean Elections Commission Voter Education Guide Paid for by the Citizens Clean Elections Fund Table of Contents Letter from the Commission 2 Disclaimer 3 Election Dates 4 Alternative Formats 4 Help America Vote Act of 2002 4 General Voting Information 4 What is My Legislative District? 5-6 Arizona’s Citizens Clean Elections Act 7 The Citizens Clean Elections Commission 8 Contact the Commission 9 Citizens Clean Elections Commissioners 9 Citizens Clean Elections Commission Staff 9 Citizens Clean Elections Fund 10 Tax Credits 10 Candidate Statements 11-106 Candidate Statement Pamphlet Primary Election Letter from the Commission Dear Arizona Voters: The year 2006 is a major election year in Arizona. By voting in the Primary and General Elections this fall, you will be electing candidates for 7 statewide offices and 90 legislative seats consisting of 30 Senators and 60 Representatives. This Candidate Statement Pamphlet is a nonpartisan, plain-language handbook published by the Citizens Clean Elections Commission, an independent state agency, to give you information about state elections. The Commission’s mission is to fairly, faithfully and fully implement and administer Arizona’s Citizens Clean Elections Act, which is a campaign finance reform measure initiated by Arizona citizens and passed by voters in 1998. The Act creates a new campaign financing system that provides full public funding to qualified state and legislative office candidates who agree to abide by the Citizens Clean Elections Act and Commis- sion regulations. Through the successful implementation of the Citizens Clean Elections Act, the Commission seeks to promote public confidence in the electoral process.
  • 2011 Legislative Summary

    2011 Legislative Summary

    th 50 Legislature, First Regular Session Arizona Department of Transportation Legislative Summaries 2011 Contents Members of the 50th Legislature……………………………………………….3 SORTED BY Bill Number Transportation-Related Legislative Summaries - Passed…..…………….……….7 Transportation-Related Legislation - Vetoed………………………………………. 21 *Information for Legislative Summaries was gathered from Legislation On Line Arizona (LOLA), Legislative Research Staff Bill Summaries, and bill language. **Official copies of all 2011 Chapter Laws and complete files of action for public review (for both the Regular and Special Sessions) are available on-line at www.azleg.gov - 1 - Government Relations 206 South Seventeenth Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85007-3213 Janice K. Brewer Kevin Biesty Governor Government June 7, 2011 Relations Director John S. Halikowski Director John Halikowski, Director Arizona Department of Transportation 206 South 17th Avenue, MD 100A Phoenix, AZ 85007 Dear Director Halikowski: Attached is the final summary of transportation-related legislation considered during the First Regular Session of the 50th Legislature. The First Regular Legislative Session ended on April 20, 2011 lasting 100 days. During the session, 1,496 bills, resolutions, and memorials were introduced, of which 393 were enacted and 29 were vetoed. This document and Final Summaries from previous years can be found online at http://www.azdot.gov/CCPartnerships/Government_Relations/reports.asp. Full legislative chapter text, fact sheets and other legislative information and links can be
  • Election 2006

    Election 2006

    APPENDIX: CANDIDATE PROFILES BY STATE We analyzed the fair trade positions of candidates in each race that the Cook Political Report categorized as in play. In the profiles below, race winners are denoted by a check mark. Winners who are fair traders are highlighted in blue text. Alabama – no competitive races___________________________________________ Alaska_________________________________________________________________ Governor OPEN SEAT – incumbent Frank Murkowski (R) lost in primary and was anti-fair trade. As senator, Murkowski had a 100% anti-fair trade voting record. 9 GOP Sarah Palin’s trade position is unknown. • Democratic challenger Tony Knowles is a fair trader. In 2004, Knowles ran against Lisa Murkowski for Senate and attacked her for voting for NAFTA-style trade deals while in the Senate, and for accepting campaign contributions from companies that off-shore jobs.1 Arizona________________________________________________________________ Senate: Incumbent GOP Sen. Jon Kyl. 9 Kyl is anti-fair trade. Has a 100% anti-fair trade record. • Jim Pederson (D) is a fair trader. Pederson came out attacking Kyl’s bad trade record in closing week of campaign, deciding to make off-shoring the closing issue. On Nov. 3 campaign statement: “Kyl has repeatedly voted for tax breaks for companies that ship jobs overseas, and he has voted against a measure that prohibited outsourcing of work done under federally funded contracts,” said Pederson spokesman Kevin Griffis, who added that Pederson “wants more protections [in trade pacts] related to child labor rules and environmental safeguards to help protect U.S. jobs.”2 House Arizona 1: GOP Rep. Rick Renzi incumbent 9 Renzi is anti-fair trade. 100% bad trade vote record.
  • Request for Evidence

    Request for Evidence

    KORY LANGHOFER Managing Attorney November 11, 2019 Maricopa County Board of Supervisors c/o Allister Adele, Maricopa County Attorney 301 West Jefferson Street Phoenix, Arizona 85003 [email protected] Re: Suspension of Maricopa County Assessor Paul Petersen – Request for Documents and Testimony Ms. Adel: We write by way of follow-up to our letter of November 7, 2019 in which we requested on behalf of Maricopa County Assessor Paul Petersen the evidentiary hearing afforded by Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 11-664(C) in connection with the Board of Supervisors’ putative suspension of Mr. Petersen from his constitutionally elected office. As you know, Section 11-664(C) entitles Mr. Petersen to present evidence and witnesses on his behalf. The effective vindication of this right, however, must necessarily entail means to compel the disclosure of documents and the production of witnesses, particularly when such sources of evidence are under the control of the Board and/or the County Attorney’s Office. To this end, we have set forth below documents and witnesses that must be made available to Mr. Petersen pursuant to the following provisions: 1. Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 11-664(C), which guarantees Mr. Petersen’s right to present evidence in his defense at the upcoming hearing; 2. the Arizona Public Records Act, Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 39-121, et seq., which guarantees the public’s right to review records concerning the (mis)conduct of public officers; and 3. Arizona Rule of Professional Conduct 1.4 which, as discussed below, entitles Mr. Petersen to access the records of the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office.
  • Introduction

    Introduction

    IMMIGRATION_Ch01.qxd 21/11/07 4:43 PM Page 1 Chapter 1 Introduction “America, at its best, is a welcoming society. We welcome not only immigrants themselves but the many gifts they bring and the values they live by.” So said President George W. Bush at a naturalization ceremony for new citizens at Ellis Island in July 2001. The fifty million immigrants admitted legally to the United States in the twentieth century alone lends substantial credibility to Bush’s words and to the old adage that “America is a nation of immigrants.” Indeed, immi- grants seeking their freedom and fortune and fulfilling the American dream have become part of the nation’s mythology. No symbol of this is more potent than the Statue of Liberty and no words more poignant than those of Emmas Lazarus inscribed upon it: Give me your tired, your poor. Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free The wretched refuse of your teaming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door! And yet the history of immigration to the United States is far from unambiguously positive, as Bush’s “at its best” caveat recognizes. His qualification implies that Americans have ambivalent attitudes towards immigrants and immigration and that the broadly positive welcome afforded immigrants has been punctuated by a series of anti-immigrant episodes throughout American history. Many potential immigrants have been refused entry and many new immigrants persecuted because of their skin color or religion. Others have been excluded because the resident population decided they burdened schools, hospitals, and welfare rolls, because they took the jobs of native-born workers, and because they avoided taxes.
  • FY 2016 Citizen Budget Brief

    FY 2016 Citizen Budget Brief

    -Budget Brief - CITIZENS’ BUDGET BRIEF 2016 INTRODUCTION Welcome! Welcome to the third annual Citizens’ Budget Brief! This document is one of the ways to continue the conversation on the Maricopa County budget and how to best spend our tax dollars in fiscal year (FY) 2016. The word “OUR” indicates the collective responsibility and opportunity we all have in improving our community, Maricopa County. We believe that increased transparency fosters informed and engaged citizens. This budget brief provides an overview of the organization of the County, the budget process and the revenues and expenditures for FY 2016. Thank you for engaging in this partnership of shared governance! 2016 Budget For the FY 2016 Budget, Chairman Chucri and his fellow supervisors placed an emphasis on addressing public safety concerns and focusing on mandated services, while maximizing operational efficiency and allocating resources to continue to deliver “Best in Class” service. FY 2016 Budget Annual Budget Process The annual budget provides a roadmap for how the County will address policy, financial and operational decisions in delivering services to citizens. The budget serves as an internal and external communications device outlining organizational priorities and the resources allocated to deliver County services. Page|2 CITIZENS’ BUDGET BRIEF 2016 ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE Board of Supervisors Maricopa County is a subdivision of the Arizona State government. The Board of Supervisors is the governing body for the County. Each member represents one of the five districts, which are divided geographically and by population to include a mix of urban and rural constituencies. Supervisors are elected to four- year terms and are not term-limited.
  • Table of Contents

    Table of Contents

    Table of Contents Letter from the Commission 2 Disclaimer 3 Voting Rights Act 3 General Election Date 4 Alternative Formats 4 Help America Vote Act of 2002 4 General Voting Information 4 Debate Information 4 What is My Legislative District 5 Legislative District Map 6 Arizona’s Citizens Clean Elections Act 8 The Citizens Clean Elections Commission 9 Contact the Commission 10 Citizens Clean Elections Commissioners 10 Citizens Clean Elections Commission Staff 10 Citizens Clean Elections Fund 11 Tax Credits 11 Candidate Statements 12 Candidate Statement Pamphlet General Election Letter from the Commission Dear Arizona Voters: The year 2006 is a major election year in Arizona. By voting in the General Election this fall, you will be electing candidates for 7 statewide offices and 90 legislative seats consisting of 30 Senators and 60 Repre- sentatives. This Candidate Statements Pamphlet is a nonpartisan, plain-language handbook published by the Citizens Clean Elections Commission, an independent state agency, to give you information about state elections. The Commission’s mission is to fairly, faithfully and fully implement and administer Arizona’s Citizens Clean Elections Act, which is a campaign finance reform measure initiated by Arizona citizens and passed by voters in 1998. The Act creates a new campaign financing system that provides full public funding to qualified state and legislative office candidates who agree to abide by the Citizens Clean Elections Act and Commis- sion regulations. Through the successful implementation of the Citizens Clean Elections Act, the Commission seeks to promote public confidence in the electoral process. To learn more about the Citizens Clean Elections Act, the schedule of candidate debates, to watch the debates and the Commission, please visit our web site, www.
  • Notice of a Regular Meeting of the League of Arizona Cities & Towns Executive Committee

    Notice of a Regular Meeting of the League of Arizona Cities & Towns Executive Committee

    NOTICE OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE LEAGUE OF ARIZONA CITIES & TOWNS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Friday, November 22, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. League Office Building 1820 West Washington, Phoenix Notice is hereby given to the members of the Executive Committee and to the general public that the Executive Committee will hold a meeting open to the public on November 22, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. Members of the Executive Committee will attend either in person or by telephone conference call. The Executive Committee may vote to recess the meeting and move into Executive Session on any item on this agenda. Upon completion of Executive Session, the Executive Committee may resume the meeting, open to the public, to address the remaining items on the agenda. A copy of the agenda is available at the League office building in Suite 200 or on the League website at www.azleague.org. Agenda All items on this agenda are scheduled for discussion and possible action, unless otherwise noted. 1. Review and Adoption of Minutes 2. TPT Implementation Work Group Report 3. Legislative Policy Discussion • Income Tax Study Committee • HURF Restoration/Transportation Funding • ASRS-PSPRS • Energy Deregulation 4. 2-1-1 Services Proposal 5. Mayors-Business Roundtable Update 6. Nominating Committee Report and Recommendation 7. League Annual Survey Results 8. Report of AZ Cities @ Work Campaign 9. Recap of 2013 Annual Conference; Future Conference Locations 10. 2012-2013 Audit Report 11. Report from NLC and UCM Additional informational materials are included in the agenda packet but are not part of the agenda. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING Friday, November 22, 2013 at 9:30 a.m.
  • Arizona Political Report

    Arizona Political Report

    Arizona Political Report Volume 2 Issue 2 ArizonaPoliticalReport.com March 7, 2014 Vernon Parker Jack Biltis Mario Diaz Cathi Herrod Frank Riggs In this issue of the Arizona Political Report In this issue, we talk to Cathi Herrod for civility in the wake of the Giffords is the most impressive candidate that about SB 1062, Vernon Parker about shooting—refers to Conservatives as you’ve never heard of. Riggs is a his race for the Arizona Corporation slave holders. This serves as an encore former police officer from northern Commission and Democratic to the first act in which he compared California and in 1990 he defeated a Consultant Mario Diaz about the state Joe Arpaio to Hitler. Democratic Congressman in a heavily of the Democratic Party, the race to Also in this issue, Rep. John Kavanagh Democratic district. The California replace Ed Pastor and his race for the learns what happens to a Legislator Legislature carved up his district and Maricopa Community College Board. who tries to update the public notice he was defeated in the 1992 election. You’ve probably read about the latest rules. I talk to Jack Biltis about the He then moved to a different district scandal in which Don Shooter drives Checks and Balances Initiative. And and defeated another Democratic while Republican. We’ll have an Arizona Chamber of Commerce CEO incumbent. He’s been in Arizona for update on that story. Instead of Glenn Hamer points out a land mine about 15 years and is now running for “Drinking Kool-Aid” the folks at the that folks will have to account for if Governor.
  • Seeking Solutions Can Utah’S Approach to Immigration Offer a Way Forward for Other States?

    Seeking Solutions Can Utah’S Approach to Immigration Offer a Way Forward for Other States?

    A SPECIAL REPORT: IMMIGRATION AND THE STATES Seeking Solutions Can Utah’s approach to immigration offer a way forward for other states? “We’re going to crack BY ALAN GREENBLATT gal immigrants in the state contributed to an atmosphere of violence and they had lost faith down on the illegals who are tah legislators are crafting a compro- in the federal government to take meaningful here in the country, but at the mise on immigration law that could action. end up being a model for across-the- It now seemed to Herbert that if he asked same time there’s a need for aisle cooperation for other states. the Utah Legislature to reopen its immigra- migrant workers.” ULast year, Republican Governor Gary tion bill, lawmakers might emulate Arizona’s Herbert signed a bill requiring employers to tough new approach instead of softening it. —UTAH REPRESENTATIVE STEPHEN check the citizenship status of their new hires “The mood had changed,” says Utah Rep- SANDSTROM through the federal E-Verify system. He said resentative Stephen Sandstrom. he would sign it only if legislators agreed to Even though the number of illegal immi- Although much of the law was struck down come back later in special session to soften grants in the country had dropped from more by a federal judge a day before it took effect, the law, making the verification requirement than 12 million in 2006 to about 11.2 mil- Sandstrom still thinks Utah should follow voluntary for the first year. lion in 2010, according to the Pew Hispanic Arizona’s lead.