DOCSLIB.ORG

County Election Directors

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
County Election Directors S A MESSAGE TO ARIZONA VOTERS 3 3 33 ation sos.gov egistered www.azsos.gov www.azsos.gov www.azsos.gov General ElectionGeneralon ElectionGeneralon General ElectionGeneralon ElectionGeneralon . For information. For about October 4 October 4 October 4 October 4 General Election~ November 2,2010 does and arguments for and against the . t. to receivea the to ballot in mail,request or to that use. s s office. A list of contact information for each . Arizona be. conductingwill a he ballot (pages 110-135). ar on the ballot, includingthe actual language of the registered to vote: registered to vote: registered to vote: ns November 2. State and local elections will be registered to vote: rizona Commission on Judicial Performance Review, to rizonaCommissionJudicial onPerformance Review, articipate in this importantElection. iving overseas, you can find important voting inform or visit the Secretary of State’s – Website www.az . This is the period when early ballots are mailed to r Ken Bennett Ken Arizona Secretary of State Sincerely, Sincerely, . Polling places are open from 6 a.m. - 7 p.m. Issued theby Arizona Secretary ofOffice State’s A Message to Arizona Voters November 2 November 2 November 2 November 2 October October 7 7 - - October October 22 22 October October 7 7 - - October October 22 22 2010 General Election Publicity Pamphlet 2010 , and I hope this pamphletis a helpful your tool for measure followed by a description of what the measure measure filed membersby of the public (pages 17-109) assist you in reviewing the judges whowill be on t your registration, please call your County Recorder’ CountyRecorder can be found on page 12. voters who request voters one. ContactCounty your Recorder your name be placed on the Permanent Lis EarlyVoting Election Day: Early Voting: VoterRegistration Deadline if youare notalready ElectionElection Day: Day: VoterRegistration Deadline if youare notalready VoterRegistration Deadline if youare notalready EarlyEarly Voting:Voting: • Election Day: • VoterRegistration Deadline if youare notalready • Early Voting: (1) Generalinformation about voting (pages 6-11). (2) Informationabout each proposition thatwill appe (3)A the by provided judicialperformance A review, DearArizona Voter: the Welcometo Pleasethekeep important following dates in mind: If you are either in the military or an Arizona voter l Thank taking you for the timeinform to yourself and p Some local governments will also be holding electio Thepamphlet is divided into three parts: November 2 November 2 combined on one ballot. Contact your County Recorder November November 2 2 – if you have any questions. any – if you have on page 7. on page 7. Arizona BallotProposition Guide General Election ~ November 2, 2010 Arizona Ballot Proposition Guide Table of Contents Ballot Proposition Guide and Judicial Performance Review General Election ~ November 2, 2010 General Voting Information Page Important Election Dates 2 Message to Voters from Secretary of State Ken Bennett 3 Voter Registration Information 6 Additional Online Voter Services 6 Voter Accessibility 6 Early Voting 7 Military and Overseas Voters 7 Alternate Formats 8 S S S S Voter Rights 8 T T T T N N N N Polling Place Information 8 E E E E Identification (ID) Requirements at the Polls 9 T T T T Provisional Ballots 10 N N N N O O O O Become a Poll Worker 10 C C C C Candidate Statements Pamphlet 11 F F F F County Recorders 12 O O O O County Election Directors 13 E E E E L L L L Ballot Propositions Page B B B B Proposition 106 – Proposed amendment to the constitution by the legislature relating to health care A A A A T T servicesservices.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 17 T T Arguments “For” Proposition 106 ........................................................................................................... 18 Arguments “Against” Proposition 106 .................................................................................................... 26 Ballot Format for Proposition 106 ......................................................................................................... 32 Proposition 107 – Proposed amendment to the constitution by the legislature relating to preferential treatment or discrimination prohibition ................................................... ............................................................................................................................................................... 33 Arguments “For” Proposition 107 ........................................................................................................... 34 Arguments “Against” Proposition 107 .................................................................................................... 38 Ballot Format for Proposition 107 .......................................................................................................... 42 Proposition 109 – Proposed amendment to the constitution by the legislature relating to hunting and fishing ................................................... ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 43 Arguments “For” Proposition 109 ........................................................................................................... 43 Arguments “Against” Proposition 109 .................................................................................................... 48 Ballot Format for Proposition 109 .......................................................................................................... 50 Proposition 110 – Proposed amendment to the constitution by the legislature relating to state trust lands ................................................... ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 51 Arguments “For” Proposition 110 ........................................................................................................... 52 Arguments “Against” Proposition 110 .................................................................................................... 55 Ballot Format for Proposition 110 ......................................................................................................... 56 444 Issued by the Arizona Secretary of State’s Office Arizona Ballot Proposition Guide General Election ~ November 2, 2010 Table of Contents Ballot Propositions - Continued Page Proposition 111 – Proposed amendment to the constitution by the legislature relating to the executive department ................................................... ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 57 Arguments “For” Proposition 111 ........................................................................................................... 58 Arguments “Against” Proposition 111 ................................................................................................... 60 Ballot Format for Proposition 111 ......................................................................................................... 61 Proposition 112 – Proposed amendment to the constitution by the legislature relating to initiative petitions ................................................... ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 62 Arguments “For” Proposition 112 ........................................................................................................... 63 Arguments “Against” Proposition 112 ................................................................................................... 65 Ballot Format for Proposition 112 ......................................................................................................... 66 Proposition 113 – Proposed amendment to the constitution by the legislature relating to the right to vote a secret ballot regarding employee representation ................................................... ........................................................................................................... 67 Arguments “For” Proposition 113 ........................................................................................................... 67 T T Arguments “Against” Proposition 113 ................................................................................................... 70 T T A A A A B B Ballot Format for Proposition 113 ........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sb-1292-Flyer
    Raises the continuing education standards by requiring courses to be relevant to current real estate industry issues and requires real estate educators to take 3 hours of professional workshop. The bill also extends the broker review period from 5 days to 10 business days. SIGNED BY THE GOVERNOR What This Victory Means for You... Elevates standards for instructor presentation skills and delivery of instruction to REALTORS®. Helps brokers manage risk by providing a realistic approach to broker review. Members who Supported AAR by Voting for HB 1292 House of Sally Ann Gonzales Carl Seel Adam Driggs Doris Goodale David Burnell Smith Steve Gallardo Representatives David Gowan David Stevens Ron Gould Rick Gray Andy Tobin Linda Gray Kirk Adams Jack Harper Anna Tovar Gail Griffin Lela Alston Matt Heinz Michelle Ugenti Jack Jackson Ben Arredondo Russ Jones Steve Urie Lori Klein Cecil Ash Peggy Judd Ted Vogt Linda Lopez Brenda Barton John Kavanagh Jim Weiers John McComish Judy Burges Debbie Lesko Jerry Weiers Al Melvin Chad Campbell Nancy McLain Vic Williams Robert Meza Heather Carter Javan “J.D.” Mesnard Kimberly Yee Rick Murphy Tom Chabin Eric Meyer John Nelson Chester Crandell Catherin Miranda Russell Pearce Steve Court Richard Miranda Senate Steve Pierce Debbie McCune Davis Steve Montenegro Michele Reagan Jeff Dial Justin Olson Paula Aboud David Schapira Karen Fann Lynne Pancrazi Sylvia Allen Don Shooter Steve Farley Frank Pratt Frank Antenori Kyrsten Sinema Eddie Farnsworth Terri Proud Nancy Barto Steve Smith John Fillmore Amanda Reeve Olivia Cajero Bedford Leah Landrum Taylor Tom Forese Bob Robson Andy Biggs Steve Yarbrough Ruben Gallego Macario Saldate IV Scott Bundgaard.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court for the District of Arizona
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) THE ARIZONA LIBERTARIAN ) PARTY AND MICHAEL KIELSKY, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) COMPLAINT ) MICHELE REAGAN, ) Civil Action No. ___________ ) Defendant. ) ) INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Arizona Libertarian Party (“AZLP”) and its Chairman Michael Kielsky (together, “the Libertarians”) bring this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, to vindicate rights guaranteed to them by the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. The Libertarians specifically challenge the constitutionality of two provisions of Arizona law, A.R.S. §§ 16-321 and 16-322, which establish the requirements that political parties must meet to place their candidates on Arizona’s primary election ballot. These provisions formerly enabled candidates to appear on the primary ballot by submitting nomination petitions with a number of signatures defined as a percentage of their party’s qualified registered voters in the relevant jurisdiction. In 2015, however, the provisions were amended, such that they now define the signature requirements as a percentage of all “qualified signers” in the relevant jurisdiction – a pool defined to include independent and unaffiliated voters. As applied to the Libertarians – though not to the major parties – this drastically increased the number of signatures required. In general, the new requirements for the Libertarians are at least 20 times greater than the old ones, depending on the office, and in many cases much greater. Sections 16-321 and 16-322, as amended, violate the Libertarians’ First Amendment rights on several grounds. First, they impose unconstitutionally severe signature requirements under the settled precedent of the Supreme Court of the United States. Second, they violate the Libertarians’ freedom of association, because they compel AZLP, as a practical matter, to rely on non-members for purposes of nominating its own partisan candidates.
    [Show full text]
  • Insider's Guidetoazpolitics
    olitics e to AZ P Insider’s Guid Political lists ARIZONA NEWS SERVICE ARIZONA CAPITOL TIMES • Arizona Capitol Reports FEATURING PROFILES of Arizona’s legislative & congressional districts, consultants & public policy advocates Statistical Trends The chicken Or the egg? WE’RE EXPERTS AT GETTING POLICY MAKERS TO SEE YOUR SIDE OF THE ISSUE. R&R Partners has a proven track record of using the combined power of lobbying, public relations and advertising experience to change both minds and policy. The political environment is dynamic and it takes a comprehensive approach to reach the right audience at the right time. With more than 50 years of combined experience, we’ve been helping our clients win, regardless of the political landscape. Find out what we can do for you. Call Jim Norton at 602-263-0086 or visit us at www.rrpartners.com. JIM NORTON JEFF GRAY KELSEY LUNDY STUART LUTHER 101 N. FIRST AVE., STE. 2900 Government & Deputy Director Deputy Director Government & Phoenix, AZ 85003 Public Affairs of Client Services of Client Public Affairs Director Development Associate CONTENTS Politics e to AZ ARIZONA NEWS SERVICE Insider’s Guid Political lists STAFF CONTACTS 04 ARIZONA NEWS SERVICE BEATING THE POLITICAL LEGISLATIVE Administration ODDS CONSULTANTS, DISTRICT Vice President & Publisher: ARIZONA CAPITOL TIMES • Arizona Capitol Reports Ginger L. Lamb Arizonans show PUBLIC POLICY PROFILES Business Manager: FEATURING PROFILES of Arizona’s legislative & congressional districts, consultants & public policy advocates they have ‘the juice’ ADVOCATES,
    [Show full text]
  • Citizens Clean Elections Commission VOT
    Citizens Clean Elections Commission VOT 2006 Statewide and Legislative Candidate Statements Primary Election Citizens Clean Elections Commission Voter Education Guide Paid for by the Citizens Clean Elections Fund Table of Contents Letter from the Commission 2 Disclaimer 3 Election Dates 4 Alternative Formats 4 Help America Vote Act of 2002 4 General Voting Information 4 What is My Legislative District? 5-6 Arizona’s Citizens Clean Elections Act 7 The Citizens Clean Elections Commission 8 Contact the Commission 9 Citizens Clean Elections Commissioners 9 Citizens Clean Elections Commission Staff 9 Citizens Clean Elections Fund 10 Tax Credits 10 Candidate Statements 11-106 Candidate Statement Pamphlet Primary Election Letter from the Commission Dear Arizona Voters: The year 2006 is a major election year in Arizona. By voting in the Primary and General Elections this fall, you will be electing candidates for 7 statewide offices and 90 legislative seats consisting of 30 Senators and 60 Representatives. This Candidate Statement Pamphlet is a nonpartisan, plain-language handbook published by the Citizens Clean Elections Commission, an independent state agency, to give you information about state elections. The Commission’s mission is to fairly, faithfully and fully implement and administer Arizona’s Citizens Clean Elections Act, which is a campaign finance reform measure initiated by Arizona citizens and passed by voters in 1998. The Act creates a new campaign financing system that provides full public funding to qualified state and legislative office candidates who agree to abide by the Citizens Clean Elections Act and Commis- sion regulations. Through the successful implementation of the Citizens Clean Elections Act, the Commission seeks to promote public confidence in the electoral process.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Voters Guide
    Election Season 2006 The Catholic Sun ◆ Page 1 2006 Voters Guide Arizona Catholic Conference Diocese of Gallup ◆ Diocese of Phoenix ◆ Diocese of Tucson he Arizona Catholic Conference (ACC) is the public policy arm Tof the Diocese of Phoenix, the Diocese of Tucson, and the Diocese of Gallup. We have produced this 2006 ACC Voters Guide as an important educational tool to provide unbiased information on the upcoming elections. Pursuant to Internal Revenue Service requirements legislative district. Each legislative district includes for churches and nonprofit organizations, this doc- one State Senator and two State Representatives. ument does not endorse candidates or indicate our To find the legislative district you live in, please visit support or opposition to the questions. The Voters www.azcatholicconference.org. Guide, however, is an excellent source of informa- While the 2006 Voters Guide will reach hundreds tion on the candidates’ positions on current issues. of thousands of people, you are encouraged to Included in this guide are races covering the U.S. Senate, U.S. Congress, Arizona Governor, reproduce this material and distribute it in your Secretary of State, Attorney General, Treasurer, churches. Please take time to review this guide and Corporation Commission, State Senate and State remember to visit www.azcatholicconference.org to House. It is important to remember that members sign up for legislative alerts and to keep up on the of the State Senate and State House are elected by latest information. This 2006 Voters Guide was produced by the Arizona Catholic Conference and The Catholic Sun, newspaper of the Diocese of Phoenix. www.azcatholicconference.org Page 2 ◆ The Catholic Sun votersguide Election Season 2006 n June, candidates running I for office were presented with a series of 12 statements and Arizona Catholic Conference 2006 Voters Guide asked to identify whether or not they Supported or Opposed them.
    [Show full text]
  • Voting Record of the Members of the Arizona Senate
    Voting record of the members of the Arizona Senate ASBA 2012 Legislative Scorecard Voting Record Senator Legislative DistrictParty HB 2123 HB2150 HB2272 HB2503 HB2466 HB2815 An important activity in ASBA’s public Paula Aboud policy efforts includes tracking how 28 D Y N Y N Y N 50% legislators vote on our priority bills Sylvia Allen 5 R Y Y Y Y Y Y 100% and scoring them. ASBA’s priority Frank Antenori 30 R Y Y Y Y NV Y 83% bills are ones that are the most critical Nancy Barto 7 R Y Y Y Y Y Y 100% to advancing our legislative agenda or Andy Biggs viewed as a threat. When a priority 22 R Y Y Y Y Y Y 100% bill makes its way through the Judy Burges 4 R Y Y Y Y Y Y 100% lawmaking process and receives a Olivia Cajero Bedford 27 D Y N Y N Y N 50% floor vote in both the House and Rich Crandall 19 R Y Y Y Y NV Y 83% Senate, all members of the Arizona Adam Driggs Legislature have an equal opportunity 11 R Y Y Y Y Y Y 100% to vote on the bill. Steve Gallardo 13 D Y N Y N NV N 33% Ron Gould 3 R NV Y NV Y Y N 50% ASBA had thirteen priority bills during Linda Gray 10 R Y NV Y Y Y N 67% 2012 legislative session, six of which Gail Griffin Y Y Y received floor votes in both houses 25 R Y Y Y 100% and were used to score legislators.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Bulletin Is Published by the League of Arizona Cities and Towns
    ISSUE 11 - MARCH 18, 2011 Legislative Overview Today is the 68th day of the first session of Arizona's 50th Legislature. The past week was an unusually busy one at the State Capitol, where the news was dominated by the Senate budget plan (see story below), the forced ouster of the Senate Majority Leader and defeat of immigration bills authored by the Senate President. Late Tuesday, Senate leadership released its comprehensive budget plan. The package of budget bills (SB 1612 through SB 1624) includes spending reductions at least $368 million deeper than those proposed by Governor Brewer. It also omits some $275 million in spending increases proposed in the Governor's budget. The budget package passed the Senate on Wednesday on a series of votes that generally followed along party lines. In other news, Republicans voted 12-9 to remove Senator Scott Bundgaard (R-Peoria) from his leadership position as Senate Majority Leader. He was replaced by Senator Andy Biggs (R-Gilbert). Highway User Revenue Fund Among the proposals included in the Senate budget is a diversion of $83 million from the Highway User Revenue Fund (HURF) to the Arizona Department of Transportation. Approximately one-half of that amount, $43 million, comes from that portion of HURF funding distributed to cities, towns and counties. The net effect on municipalities is a loss of approximately $26 million in HURF distributions over and above the $12.5 million reduction previously proposed by the Governor. The League opposes the additional HURF reduction and prefers and supports the Governor's budget. We will continue to work constructively with legislators and the Governor on a final budget that minimizes negative impacts on cities and towns.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Legislative Summary
    th 50 Legislature, First Regular Session Arizona Department of Transportation Legislative Summaries 2011 Contents Members of the 50th Legislature……………………………………………….3 SORTED BY Bill Number Transportation-Related Legislative Summaries - Passed…..…………….……….7 Transportation-Related Legislation - Vetoed………………………………………. 21 *Information for Legislative Summaries was gathered from Legislation On Line Arizona (LOLA), Legislative Research Staff Bill Summaries, and bill language. **Official copies of all 2011 Chapter Laws and complete files of action for public review (for both the Regular and Special Sessions) are available on-line at www.azleg.gov - 1 - Government Relations 206 South Seventeenth Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85007-3213 Janice K. Brewer Kevin Biesty Governor Government June 7, 2011 Relations Director John S. Halikowski Director John Halikowski, Director Arizona Department of Transportation 206 South 17th Avenue, MD 100A Phoenix, AZ 85007 Dear Director Halikowski: Attached is the final summary of transportation-related legislation considered during the First Regular Session of the 50th Legislature. The First Regular Legislative Session ended on April 20, 2011 lasting 100 days. During the session, 1,496 bills, resolutions, and memorials were introduced, of which 393 were enacted and 29 were vetoed. This document and Final Summaries from previous years can be found online at http://www.azdot.gov/CCPartnerships/Government_Relations/reports.asp. Full legislative chapter text, fact sheets and other legislative information and links can be
    [Show full text]
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ARIZONA LIBERTARIAN PARTY; No. 13-16254 ARIZONA GREEN PARTY; JAMES MARCH; KENT SOLBERG; STEVE DC No. LACKEY, 4:11 cv-0856 Plaintiffs-Appellants, CKJ v. ORDER AND MICHELE REAGAN, Secretary of AMENDED State, OPINION Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted January 29, 2015—University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law, Tucson, Arizona Filed April 24, 2015 Amended August 7, 2015 Before: A. Wallace Tashima, M. Margaret McKeown, and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges. Order; Opinion by Judge Tashima; Concurrence by Judge McKeown 2 ARIZONA LIBERTARIAN PARTY V. REAGAN SUMMARY* Civil Rights The panel affirmed the district court’s summary judgment in an action brought by the Arizona Green Party, the Arizona Libertarian Party, and three of their members alleging that Arizona’s voter registration form violates their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights. In 2011, the Arizona Legislature enacted a law requiring the voter registration form distributed by the Arizona Secretary of State to list the two largest parties (as measured by number of registered voters) on the form, as well as provide a blank line for “other party preferences.” See Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 16-152(A)(5). Prior to the 2011 amendment, Arizona law required only that voter registration forms include a blank space for the registrant’s party preference. The panel first determined that plaintiffs failed to adduce evidence that the revised registration form actually discourages or prevents voters from registering with minor parties.
    [Show full text]
  • IN the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the DISTRICT of ALASKA JED WHITTAKER, Plaintiff, V. BYRON MALLOTT, in His Official Capac
    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA JED WHITTAKER, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:16-cv-00220-SLG BYRON MALLOTT, in his official capacity as Lieutenant Governor of the State of Alaska, Defendant. ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Before the Court at Docket 8 is Plaintiff Jed Whittaker’s Motion for Summary Judgment and at Docket 15 is Defendant Byron Mallott’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant did not respond to Plaintiff’s motion, which was filed before Defendant was served with the Complaint. Plaintiff opposed Defendant’s motion at Docket 19. No reply was filed.1 Also before the Court, at Docket 17, is Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant opposed this motion to strike at Docket 19. Oral argument was not requested and was not necessary to the Court’s decision. BACKGROUND This case concerns the constitutionality of Alaska’s ballot access requirements as codified at Alaska Statute (AS) 15.25.160. Plaintiff Jed Whittaker was a candidate for United States Senator for Alaska in 2016; he was not affiliated with a “political party” as that term is defined by Alaska law.2 To have his name printed on the official ballot, Mr. 1 Plaintiff filed a notice of supplemental authority at Docket 25 and Docket 26. 2 See AS 15.80.010(27) (defining a “political party” as one whose candidate obtained three percent of the vote in the immediately preceding general election for governor, U.S. Senator, or Case 3:16-cv-00220-SLG Document 27 Filed 04/27/17 Page 1 of 23 Whittaker was required to submit a petition “signed by qualified voters of the state equal in number to at least one percent of the number of voters who cast ballots in the preceding general election.”3 For the 2016 election, a petition was valid if it contained at least 2,854 signatures.4 Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • CSG West Western Legislative Academy Alumni 2000–2017
    CSG West Western Legislative Academy Alumni 2000–2017 ALASKA Sen. Bert Stedman-06 Fmr. Sen. Tom O’Halleran-02 Rep. Joann Ginal-14 Fmr. Rep. Bob Buch-09 Sen. Gary Stevens-01 Fmr. Sen. Lynne Pancrazi-10 Sen. Kevin Grantham-11 Rep. Matt Claman-15 Rep. Dave Talerico-15 Fmr. Sen. Jonathon Paton-07 Fmr. Rep. Dale Hall-06 Sen. John Coghill, Jr.-02 Rep. Geran Tarr-15 Fmr. Rep. Daniel Patterson-10 Rep. Millie Hamner-12 Sen. Mia Costello-11 Fmr. Sen. Joe Thomas-09 Sen. Frank Pratt-12 Rep. Chris Hansen - 17 Fmr. Rep. Eric Croft-00 Fmr. Rep. William Thomas, Jr.-06 Rep. Macario Saldate IV-12 Fmr. Sen. Mary Hodge-02 Fmr. Rep. Nancy Dahlstrom-04 Rep. Steve Thompson-12 Rep. Thomas T.J. Shope-13 Fmr. Sen. Evie Hudak-10 Rep. Harriet Drummond-16 Rep. Cathy Tilton-15 Fmr. Rep. David Smith-11 The late Sen. Jim Isgar-04 Rep. Bryce Edgmon-10 Rep. Chris Tuck-12 Fmr. Rep. Victoria Steele -13 Sen. Cheri Jahn-04 Fmr. Rep. Hugh “Bud” Fate-02 Fmr. Sen. Thomas Wagoner-03 Fmr. Sen. Thayer Verschoor-03 Fmr. Rep. Ramey Johnson-03 Fmr. Rep. Eric Feige-13 Sen. Bill Wielechowski-09 Fmr. Rep. Ted Vogt-11 Fmr. Rep. Janak Joshi-11 Rep. Neal Foster-11 Fmr. Sen. Gary Wilken-00 Fmr. Sen. Kelli Ward-13 Sen. John M. Kefalas-10 Fmr. Rep. Lynn Gattis-14 Fmr. Rep. Peggy Wilson-01 Fmr. Sen. Jim Waring-04 Fmr. Rep. James J. Kerr-06 The late Rep. Carl Gatto-06 Fmr. Rep. Rae Waters-09 Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Arizona Legislative Scorecard -- (27Th
    2011 Arizona Legislative Scorecard -- (27th annual scorecard from AFP/AFT) Americans for Prosperity 2011 Arizona Legislative Scorecard www.aztaxpayers.org 2011 05-11 Cumulative Chamber Legislator--2011 Score 2011 Designation 10 09 08 07 06 05 Avg. Designation Party LD Senate Andy Biggs 99 Hero of the Taxpayer 82 61 96 94 72 84 84 Champion of the Taxpayer R 22 Senate Ron Gould 99 Hero of the Taxpayer 84 70 96 97 90 89 89 Champion of the Taxpayer R 3 Senate Russell K. Pearce 95 Hero of the Taxpayer 84 90 89 91 71 84 86 Champion of the Taxpayer R 18 Senate Scott Bundgaard 95 Hero of the Taxpayer 95 Hero of the Taxpayer R 4 Senate Gail Griffin 95 Hero of the Taxpayer 95 Hero of the Taxpayer R 25 Senate Steve Smith 95 Hero of the Taxpayer 95 Hero of the Taxpayer R 23 Senate Lori Klein 95 Hero of the Taxpayer 95 Hero of the Taxpayer R 6 Senate Sylvia Allen 94 Hero of the Taxpayer 48 90 98 83 Champion of the Taxpayer R 5 Senate Steve Pierce 94 Hero of the Taxpayer 44 88 76 Friend of the Taxpayer R 1 Senate Rick Murphy 94 Hero of the Taxpayer 49 74 82 82 67 84 76 Friend of the Taxpayer R 9 Senate Adam Driggs 94 Hero of the Taxpayer 79 73 79 70 79 Friend of the Taxpayer R 11 Senate Steven Yarbrough 93 Hero of the Taxpayer 42 72 84 75 63 69 71 Friend of the Taxpayer R 21 Senate Nancy K.
    [Show full text]