DOCSLIB.ORG

Insider's Guidetoazpolitics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

olitics e to AZ P Insider’s Guid Political lists ARIZONA NEWS SERVICE ARIZONA CAPITOL TIMES • Arizona Capitol Reports FEATURING PROFILES of Arizona’s legislative & congressional districts, consultants & public policy advocates Statistical Trends The chicken Or the egg? WE’RE EXPERTS AT GETTING POLICY MAKERS TO SEE YOUR SIDE OF THE ISSUE. R&R Partners has a proven track record of using the combined power of lobbying, public relations and advertising experience to change both minds and policy. The political environment is dynamic and it takes a comprehensive approach to reach the right audience at the right time. With more than 50 years of combined experience, we’ve been helping our clients win, regardless of the political landscape. Find out what we can do for you. Call Jim Norton at 602-263-0086 or visit us at www.rrpartners.com. JIM NORTON JEFF GRAY KELSEY LUNDY STUART LUTHER 101 N. FIRST AVE., STE. 2900 Government & Deputy Director Deputy Director Government & Phoenix, AZ 85003 Public Affairs of Client Services of Client Public Affairs Director Development Associate CONTENTS Politics e to AZ ARIZONA NEWS SERVICE Insider’s Guid Political lists STAFF CONTACTS 04 ARIZONA NEWS SERVICE BEATING THE POLITICAL LEGISLATIVE Administration ODDS CONSULTANTS, DISTRICT Vice President & Publisher: ARIZONA CAPITOL TIMES • Arizona Capitol Reports Ginger L. Lamb Arizonans show PUBLIC POLICY PROFILES Business Manager: FEATURING PROFILES of Arizona’s legislative & congressional districts, consultants & public policy advocates they have ‘the juice’ ADVOCATES, Bonnie Porter Statistical Which legislative Trends by thriving in a CAMPAIGN & district has the Arizona Capitol Times rugged political highest percentage Editorial PUBLIC climate of democratic Arizona News Service Editor: RELATIONS Jim Small SPECIALISTS voters Managing Editor: ................................13 Tom Spratt Copy Editor/Reporter: Don Harris New Media Specialist: Evan Wyloge Staff Writers: Jeremy Duda, Ben Giles, Gary Grado, Hank Stephenson Special Publications Editor: Josh Coddington Display Advertising 25 53 Director: Melanie Campbell Consultant: Emily Cuppy ELECTIONS LEGISLATURE STATEWIDE BUDGET Public Notices Advertising What year had When was the ELECTED Who is the Manager: Laura Kaminski the highest turnout longest legislative OFFICIALS highest Coordinators: Laurinda Cook Maria Engelmann in the primary session Who holds the paid state Laurene Pitzer elections ................................35 record for the official ................................27 ................................67 Circulation most vetoes Audience Development Managers: ................................56 Disa McClellan Carol Swanson Production Manager: Julie Lanley Artist: Gabe Turner Arizona Capitol Reports Manager: Vince Carbajal MORE Assistant Editor: Luige del Puerto 78 Coordinator: Tracy Keller COURTS U.S. CONGRESS COMPLETE STATISTICS Research Assistant: Alyson Zepeda & TRENDS Records/Web Coordinator: Jeff Turner Which judge served What member TABLE INDEX Assistant: Scott Newell the longest of the U.S. Senate INSIDE How to reach us on the bench served the 1835 West Adams Street Phoenix, AZ 85007 ................................72 longet term 602.258.7026 ................................78 azcapitoltimes.com Subscriptions 1.800.451.9998 Advertising Additional copies of the 2014 Political Almanac can be ordered for $21.95 each plus shipping and 602.889.7125 handling. Call 602.258.7026 or go to our Capitol Store at www.azcapitoltimes.com. Arizona Capitol Times (USPS Periodical Permit 545-880, ISSN 0744-7477) is published weekly, with one additional special issue at year end, at Phoenix, Maricopa County, Arizona by Arizona News Service, LLC, 1835 W. Adams St., Phoenix 85007-2603. Subscriptions: One year $149; two years $259. Subscriptions include unlimited online access to www.azcapitoltimes.com Postmaster: Send all address changes to Arizona Capitol Times, Box 2260, Phoenix, Arizona 85002. Periodicals postage paid at Phoenix, Arizona. 2 ARIZONA NEWS SERVICE 2014 Political Almanac Beating the odds Arizonans show they have ‘the juice’ by thriving in a rugged political climate BEN GILES ARIZONA CHAMBER OF [email protected] COMMERCE AND ny year in Arizona politics is full of surprises, some more INDUSTRY shocking than others. In 2013, it was those who delivered news Athat shocked the political landscape who turned out to have By almost any measure, CEO Glenn “the juice,” often because they had the power and influence to deliver Hamer and the Arizona Chamber of on their promises and see to it that goals were met. It wasn’t always a Commerce and Industry had an over- pretty year at the Capitol, but these politicians, lobbyists and interest whelmingly successful session, accom- groups proved more than capable of checking items off their agendas, plishing almost all of their legislative pri- proving their influence and worth amidst what turned out to be a orities. The Proposition 204 population rugged, brutal political climate, the likes of which some political was restored as part of the governor’s Medicaid expansion proposal and Tea observers hadn’t seen in decades – and most predict won’t be seen Glenn Hamer again for years. Party efforts to derail funding for Common Core were fought off. The JAN BREWER chamber is a part of a massive business-based effort to help the stan- dards, now known in the state as the Arizona College and Career Ready Arizona’s controversial governor Standards. The chamber will likely continue to play a major role in turned heads in January 2013 when she efforts to support Common Core in Arizona as the vitriol against the announced her support for the standards grows louder. Affordable Care Act as the most effi- It took all session, but business leaders were able to help push cient, cost-effective way to expand through Brewer’s overhaul of the state’s sales tax system. HB2111 Medicaid in Arizona and solve the streamlines the state’s complicated transaction privilege tax system and state’s health care woes. The Republican makes life easier on businesses that once had to file tax information in leader quickly drew the ire of her party’s multiple jurisdictions. And though the law is being challenged in grassroots base, but showed she had the court, legislation was approved that allows higher contribution limits juice to survive an onslaught of conser- for PACs, raising what were some of the lowest contribution limits in vative criticism and push her agenda Jan Brewer the country. through a turbulent legislative session. The debate over Medicaid expansion, or the lack of a desire by leaders in both chambers of the Arizona Legislature, nearly derailed budget KEN STROBECK AND discussions until Brewer declared she’d had enough and called for a KEVIN MCCARTHY special session to push her signature bill of the 2013 session through Strobeck, executive director of the the Legislature with support from Arizona Democrats and a handful of League of Arizona Cities and Towns, GOP lawmakers willing to break ranks as Brewer had. spent the bulk of his efforts during the Though entering her final year as governor, Brewer figures to be no 2013 legislative sessions fighting to gain less influential in 2014 than she proved capable of this year. Her new ground in the debate over transaction independent expenditure committee (IE), Arizona’s Legacy, has vowed privilege tax reform, a measure that the to support candidates and issues that support and advance “Governor League opposed most of the year. But Jan Brewer’s pragmatic conservative governance in the State of Strobeck withdrew his organization as a Arizona.” In other words, the governor is asking her supporters to roadblock to the legislation after negoti- reach deep into their pockets in order to help defend and reelect those ating some compromises into the bill, Ken Strobeck 13 remaining lawmakers who voted to pass Medicaid expansion. And primarily getting the governor to abandon efforts to get rid of don’t be surprised if Brewer seeks to put a stamp on her legacy in what Arizona’s prime contracting formula, which splits sales taxes on con- will be her final budget proposal come next session. struction material between the cities where materials are used and pur- chased. ARIZONA NEWS SERVICE 2014 Political Almanac 3 After serving on the governor’s shell of a plan in her State of the State Transaction Privilege Tax Simplification address in January. Carter was later seen Task Force in 2012, Arizona Tax Research at a series of rallies standing alongside Association president Kevin McCarthy Brewer in support of the Medicaid helped push reform legislation through expansion bill. She was an outspoken the Capitol in 2013. As cities and towns supporter of the proposal in the House, lamented how the legislation might hurt despite any concerns that her support of their bottom line, McCarthy joined a a proposal unpopular with many in the cohort of lawmakers pushing for the pas- Republican Party could harm her come sage of the bill as soon as possible, argu- election season. ing that Arizona had fallen behind the The Senate became the first chamber curve in its tax structure. The result may to approve Medicaid expansion in May as Kevin McCarthy not have been perfect, but it accomplished part of a budget deal that left McComish, Sen. John McComish one of the governor’s top priorities of the R-Phoenix, as the lawmaker to put his session. name alongside the controversial proposal. Senate President Andy Biggs had plans to introduce all budget bills in his own name, but balked at sponsoring legislation linked to Obamacare – leaving McComish to REP. HEATHER CARTER sponsor the amendment on behalf of the governor. Political observers AND SEN. JOHN saw the moment as a mark of Biggs’ defeat in his push to halt Medicaid MCCOMISH expansion efforts and the end of the first roadblock to Brewer’s No. 1 legislative priority. McComish must now lead a fractured caucus as the Carter was out front on Medicaid Senate majority leader who had some GOP senators calling for his head expansion from day one, declaring her in the aftermath of the session.
Recommended publications
  • Brief of Mi Familia Vota, Arizona Center For

    Brief of Mi Familia Vota, Arizona Center For

    Nos.: 19-1257 & 19-1258 In The Supreme Court of the United States MARK BRNOVICH, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ARIZONA, ET AL., Petitioners, – v. – DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, ET AL., Respondents. _________________________ ARIZONA REPUBLICAN PARTY, ET AL., Petitioners, – v. – DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, ET AL., Respondents. _______________________________ ON WRITS OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BRIEF FOR AMICI CURIAE MI FAMILIA VOTA, ARIZONA CENTER FOR EMPOWERMENT, CHISPA ARIZONA and LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF ARIZONA IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS JASON A. LECKERMAN ROY HERRERA Counsel of Record DANIEL A. ARELLANO BALLARD SPAHR LLP JILLIAN L. ANDREWS 1735 Market Street, 51st Floor IAN O. BUCON Philadelphia, PA 19103 BALLARD SPAHR LLP (215) 665-8500 1 East Washington Street, [email protected] Suite 2300 Phoenix, Arizona 85004 (602) 798-5400 [email protected] Counsel for Amici Curiae i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ................................... iii INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE .............................. 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT .................................. 2 ARGUMENT ............................................................. 4 I. Latino Americans’ Right to Vote Is Under Attack ................................................................. 4 A. In Enacting H.B. 2023, the Arizona Legislature Codified Anti-Latino Sentiment ....................................................... 7 B. Arizona’s Legislators Have an Established Record of Anti-Latino Rhetoric ...................... 9 II. The History of the Voting Rights Act Has Been to Include and Protect Latino Voters ..... 10 III. Courts Have Found Attacks on Latino Voters, and § 2 Has Protected These Voters ............... 13 ii IV. The Ninth Circuit Properly Analyzed Arizona’s Voting Policies and Correctly Concluded They Violate the Voting Rights Act ........................... 14 A. Arizona’s Challenged Policies Impose a Disparate Burden on Minority Voters ..........................................................
  • Sb-1292-Flyer

    Sb-1292-Flyer

    Raises the continuing education standards by requiring courses to be relevant to current real estate industry issues and requires real estate educators to take 3 hours of professional workshop. The bill also extends the broker review period from 5 days to 10 business days. SIGNED BY THE GOVERNOR What This Victory Means for You... Elevates standards for instructor presentation skills and delivery of instruction to REALTORS®. Helps brokers manage risk by providing a realistic approach to broker review. Members who Supported AAR by Voting for HB 1292 House of Sally Ann Gonzales Carl Seel Adam Driggs Doris Goodale David Burnell Smith Steve Gallardo Representatives David Gowan David Stevens Ron Gould Rick Gray Andy Tobin Linda Gray Kirk Adams Jack Harper Anna Tovar Gail Griffin Lela Alston Matt Heinz Michelle Ugenti Jack Jackson Ben Arredondo Russ Jones Steve Urie Lori Klein Cecil Ash Peggy Judd Ted Vogt Linda Lopez Brenda Barton John Kavanagh Jim Weiers John McComish Judy Burges Debbie Lesko Jerry Weiers Al Melvin Chad Campbell Nancy McLain Vic Williams Robert Meza Heather Carter Javan “J.D.” Mesnard Kimberly Yee Rick Murphy Tom Chabin Eric Meyer John Nelson Chester Crandell Catherin Miranda Russell Pearce Steve Court Richard Miranda Senate Steve Pierce Debbie McCune Davis Steve Montenegro Michele Reagan Jeff Dial Justin Olson Paula Aboud David Schapira Karen Fann Lynne Pancrazi Sylvia Allen Don Shooter Steve Farley Frank Pratt Frank Antenori Kyrsten Sinema Eddie Farnsworth Terri Proud Nancy Barto Steve Smith John Fillmore Amanda Reeve Olivia Cajero Bedford Leah Landrum Taylor Tom Forese Bob Robson Andy Biggs Steve Yarbrough Ruben Gallego Macario Saldate IV Scott Bundgaard.
  • Economic Development Committee 2/2/21 Meeting Agenda Packet

    Economic Development Committee 2/2/21 Meeting Agenda Packet

    SPECIAL NOTICE REGARDING PUBLIC MEETINGS Due to the risks to public health caused by the possible spread of the COVID-19 virus at public gatherings, the Maricopa Association of Governments has determined that public meetings will be indefinitely held through technological means. Meetings will be open to the public through technological means. In reliance on, and compliance with, the March 13, 2020, Opinion issued by Attorney General Mark Brnovich, the Maricopa Association of Governments provides this special advance notice of the technological means through which public meetings may be accessed. While this special notice is in effect, public comment at meetings will only be accepted through written submissions, which may or may not be read aloud during meetings. To attend the meeting noticed below by technological means, members of the public may: 1. To watch a live video stream of the meeting, click here to go to MAG’s YouTube channel. 2. Members of the public may submit written comments relating to this meeting to azmag.gov/comment. Comments may be sent at any time leading up to the meeting, but must be received at least one hour prior to the posted start time for the meeting. If any member of the public has difficulty connecting to the meeting, please contact MAG at (602) 254-6300 for support. January 26, 2021 TO: Members of the MAG Economic Development Committee FROM: Councilmember David Luna, City of Mesa, Chair SUBJECT: MEETING NOTIFICATION AND TRANSMITTAL OF TENTATIVE AGENDA Tuesday, February 2, 2021 – 11:30 a.m. Virtual Meeting The MAG Economic Development Committee meeting has been scheduled at the time noted above.
  • Regulating Our Mischievous Factions: Presidential Nominations and the Law Andrew Pierce Goldstein & Phillips

    Regulating Our Mischievous Factions: Presidential Nominations and the Law Andrew Pierce Goldstein & Phillips

    Kentucky Law Journal Volume 78 | Issue 2 Article 4 1989 Regulating Our Mischievous Factions: Presidential Nominations and the Law Andrew Pierce Goldstein & Phillips Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj Part of the Election Law Commons Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you. Recommended Citation Pierce, Andrew (1989) "Regulating Our Mischievous Factions: Presidential Nominations and the Law," Kentucky Law Journal: Vol. 78 : Iss. 2 , Article 4. Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj/vol78/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kentucky Law Journal by an authorized editor of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Regulating Our Mischievous Factions: Presidential Nominations and the Law By ANDREW PIERCE* TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................. 312 I. BRIEF HISTORY OF PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATIONS ....... 314 II. PROCEDURAL AND SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES INVOLVED IN CHALLENGES TO PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION PROCEDURES .................................................... 316 A. Substantive Grounds for Challenging Party A ctions .................................................... 316 1. Constitutional Challenges ...................... 316 2. Statutory Challenges ............................. 318 3. Party Rules ......................................... 319 B. Procedural Issues ......................................
  • Four Days in July That Rocked Indiana Pence’S Pursuit of Veep Nod, Holcomb’S Win at GOP Central Committee Were Bold Moves Toward November History by BRIAN A

    Four Days in July That Rocked Indiana Pence’S Pursuit of Veep Nod, Holcomb’S Win at GOP Central Committee Were Bold Moves Toward November History by BRIAN A

    V22, N15 Thursday, Nov. 17, 2016 Four days in July that rocked Indiana Pence’s pursuit of veep nod, Holcomb’s win at GOP Central Committee were bold moves toward November history By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS – When filing back through time to make sense of the Gov. Mike Pence and Lt. Gov. Eric Holcomb sensational Nov. 8 election that catapulted celebrate their Election Day victories that Gov. Mike Pence were forged by four momentus days in into global power July, including Trump’s visit to Indianapolis and capped Eric and Westfield. Holcomb’s unprec- edented rise in Indi- Republican presidential ticket with ana, it comes down Donald Trump. Except it was not fait to four days in July accompli. That wouldn’t happen until when the historic Friday, July 15. and fateful dramas unfolded. And on Monday July 25, after 22 Indiana Republi- On July 14, we witnessed cable breaking news can Central Committee members migrated back to Indiana reports of Gov. and Mrs. Pence disembarking on a charter from the Republican National Convention in Cleveland, the flight from Indianapolis to Teterboro, N.J., in what most thought was an obvious sign he was about to join the Continued on page 3 2016 winners and losers By MARK SOUDER FORT WAYNE – Every election results in individual and categorical winners and losers that impact the longer- term future of politics. Here are a few of my selections. Indiana winner: The Pence/Coats establishment. “The very worst choice you can It directed the quasi-slating of the victorious state ticket: Todd make is to opt out as a citizen, to Young for Senate, in part by give in to the cynicsm, the moving Eric Holcomb out and into position to become gover- despair and the anger.
  • Revisiting the Urban-Rural Relationship in Arizona

    Revisiting the Urban-Rural Relationship in Arizona

    Revisiting the Urban-Rural Relationship in Arizona David R. Berman Professor Emeritus of Political Science Arizona State University November 2019 Throughout the nation, there has been somewhat of a Table 1. Arizona Population, Percent Urban, Compared to revival in urban living, and many big cities seem relatively National Population* well off in economic terms, though progress has been uneven. On the other hand, many rural areas have been Year Arizona Percent National Population Population in decline and seem likely to continue to lose out when it Urban Percent Urban comes to population, economic development, and political influence in state politics. A wide variety of socio-economic 1900 122,931 15.9 39.6 measurements indicate that rural counties are in particularly bad shape, far worse off than the other major population 1910 204,354 31.0 45.6 groupings of big cities, suburbs, and small-to-medium metro 1920 334,162 36.1 51.2 areas.1 Population losses, unemployment, and poverty are 1930 435,573 34.4 56.1 common to many small towns in rural areas. One can find numerous examples of towns where a major employer has 1940 499,261 34.8 56.5 shut down or moved away and the community shrinks to a 1950 749,587 55.5 64.0 point where governments can do virtually nothing to stem 1960 74.5 69.9 the contraction.2 1,302,161 1970 1,770,900 79.6 73.6 This report, based on an examination of population, voting, 1980 2,718,215 83.8 73.7 and governmental spending information, relevant archival and secondary sources, and a series of interviews, looks into 1990 3,665,228 87.5 75.2 the long-term developments affecting urban-rural relations 2000 5,130,632 88.2 79.0 in Arizona.
  • Administrative Register

    Administrative Register

    - r1z Administrative Register A Weekly Publication of the Secretary of State's Office Volume 4, Issues 32-52 December 31, 1998 A SEMI-ANNUAL INDEX TO EXECUTIVE ORDERS, PROCLAMATIONS, OPINIONS, AND APPOINTMENTS Contents of this Issue Introduction and List ofissuses Indexed ..•......................•..•..............•............................ 2 Governor's Executive Orders and Proclamations Index ..............................••••......•.......•.......... 3 Attorney General Opinions Index .................................................•...................•....•... 4 Governor's Appointments of State Officials and Members of Boards and Commissions Index .•...........••.•.•..•..... 5 State Elected Officials ...............................................................................••.•... 121 Order Form .....•..........•..•.........•.............•....•..................•...................••.•... 123 Application for Boards and Commissions ............................•.•...............................•.....• 124 Mimi Griffiths BETSEY BAYLESS Rhonda Paschal Director Secretary ofState Register Editor Public Services Department Leighanne Mayr Legislative Intern Arizona Admlnistratwe Register Semi-Annual Index to Executive Orders, Proclamations, Opinions, and Appointments Introduction This Semi-Annual Index contains the Governor's executive orders and proclamations, Attorney General opinions, and the Governor's appointments of state officials and members of boards and commissions. The Semi-Annual Index to rulemaking activity that appeared
  • Party and Non-Party Political Committees Vol. II State and Local Party Detailed Tables

    Party and Non-Party Political Committees Vol. II State and Local Party Detailed Tables

    FEC REPORTS ON FINANCIAL ACTIVITY 1989 - 1990 FINAL REPORT .. PARTY AND NON-PARTY POLITICAL COKMITTEES VOL.II STATE AND LOCAL PARTY DETAILED TABLES FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 999 E Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20463 OCTOBER 1991 I I I I I I I I FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION Commissioners John w. McGarry, Chairman Joan D. Aikens, Vice Chairman Lee Ann Elliott, Thomas J. Josefiak Danny L. McDonald Scott E. Thomas Donnald K. Anderson, Ex Officio Clerk of the u.s. House of Representatives Walter J. Stewart Secretary of the Senate John C. Surina, Staff Director Lawrence M. Noble, General Counsel Comments and inquiries about format should be addressed to the Reports Coordinator, Data System Development Division, who coordinated the production of this REPORT. Copies of 1989-1990 FINAL REPORT, PARTY AND NON-PARTY POLITICAL COMMITTEES, may be obtained b writing to the Public Records Office, Federal Election Commission, 999 E Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20463. Prices are: VOL. I - $10.00, VOL. II - $10.00, VOL. III - $10.00, VOL IV - $10.00. Checks should be made payable to the Federal Election Commission. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. DESCRIPTION OF REPORT iv II. SUMMARY OF TABLES vi III. EXPLANATION OF COLUMNS viii IV. TABLES: SELECTED FINANCIAL ACTIVITY AND ASSISTANCE TO CANDIDATES, DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN STATE AND LOCAL POLITICAL COMMITTEES A. SELECTED FINANCIAL ACTIVITY OF DEMOCRATIC STATE AND LOCAL POLITICAL COMMITTEES AND THEIR ASSISTANCE TO CANDIDATES BY OFFICE AND PARTY Alabama 1 Missouri 37 Colorado 7 New York 43 Idaho 13 Ohio 49 Kansas 19
  • S/L Sign on Letter Re: Rescue Plan State/Local

    S/L Sign on Letter Re: Rescue Plan State/Local

    February 17, 2021 U.S. House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 U.S. Senate Washington, D.C. 20510 Dear Members of Congress: As elected leaders representing communities across our nation, we are writing to urge you to take immediate action on comprehensive coronavirus relief legislation, including desperately needed funding for states, counties, cities, and schools, and an increase in states’ federal medical assistance percentage (FMAP). President Biden’s ambitious $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan will go a long way towards alleviating the significant financial strain COVID-19 has placed on our states, counties, cities, and schools, and the pocketbooks of working families. Working people have been on the frontlines of this pandemic for nearly a year and have continued to do their jobs during this difficult time. Dedicated public servants are still leaving their homes to ensure Americans continue to receive the essential services they rely upon: teachers and education workers are doing their best to provide quality education and keep their students safe, janitors are still keeping parks and public buildings clean, while healthcare providers are continuing to care for the sick. Meanwhile, it has been ten months since Congress passed the CARES Act Coronavirus Relief Fund to support these frontline workers and the essential services they provide. Without significant economic assistance from the federal government, many of these currently-middle class working families are at risk of falling into poverty through no fault of their own. It is a painful irony that while many have rightly called these essential workers heroes, our country has failed to truly respect them with a promise to protect them and pay them throughout the crisis.
  • Revolving Congress

    Revolving Congress

    Revolving Congress: The Revolving Door Class of 2019 Flocks to K Street Nearly Two Thirds of Former Members of 115th Congress Working Outside Politics and Government Have Picked Up Lobbying or Strategic Consulting Jobs By Alan Zibel, Public Citizen Research Director May 30, 2019 – Nearly two-thirds of recently retired or defeated U.S. lawmakers now working outside politics have landed jobs influencing federal policy, providing further evidence that members of Congress continue to spin through Washington’s revolving door at astonishing rates. Public Citizen analyzed the post-Congress employment activities of the 115th Congress, which started in 2017 and concluded on Jan. 3 of this year. Of the former members who have found new jobs outside of government and politics, 59% (26 of 44) were working for lobbying firms, consulting firms, trade groups or business groups working to influence federal government activities. Many others were working in television (14%) law (9%) corporate jobs (7%) academia (7%) or state-level groups (5%). Category Count Pct. Lobbying/consulting 22 50% Business/Trade Group (Federal) 4 9% Television 6 14% Law 4 9% Academia 3 7% Corporate 3 7% Business/Trade Group (State) 2 5% Subtotal Federal Influence 26 59% Grand Total 44 100% Sources: Roll Call, Public Citizen research Over the past two decades, concern has been building about members of Congress who flock to lobbying firms or trade groups after retiring or losing their seats. These revolving-door lawmakers cash in on their connections by representing wealthy special interests who can afford to pay top dollar for insider influence. Revolving Congress Public Citizen In the 115th Congress, there have been several notable examples of the revolving door activity, with two of the largest Washington, D.C.
  • The President's Message

    The President's Message

    October 2004 The President’s Message By Jake Jacobsen, PLEA President Politics, Propositions, and the Crystal Second Chance Body Armor Files Ball For Chapter 11 Protection October 19th, 2004 Every two years we are inundated with the Central Lake, Michigan realities of freedom. It’s called politics. It’s the price we pay to live in the greatest country in Second Chance Body Armor filed for the world. We endure month after month of Chapter 11 Bankruptcy protection following signs, debates, editorials, campaign promises, lawsuits in at least nine states accusing it of and slogans. We listen to candidates make selling defective bullet resistant vests to Po- charges and counter-charges at their oppo- lice officers. nents. Some candidates will look you in the Your union is not concerned Second Chance is the nation's largest eye and lie their backside off to get your vote. manufacturer of soft, concealable body Politicians will stretch, bend, twist, turn, and with the (R) or (D) or (L) or armor for law enforcement. The filing spin the truth to make it sound beneficial to (I) behind a candidates name. was done Sunday in U.S. Bankruptcy them. What is important is where Court in Grand Rapids. One thing to keep in mind as you wade these people stand on issues PLEA and the APA brought this to the attention of Arizona Attorney General into the mine field of allegations and accusa- important to Labor and Law tions from one candidate about another… Terry Goddard several months ago. APA Why would anyone spend thousands of dol- Enforcement.
  • Citizens Clean Elections Commission 2004 Statewide and Legislative Candidate Statements

    Citizens Clean Elections Commission 2004 Statewide and Legislative Candidate Statements

    Citizens Clean Elections Commission 2004 Statewide and Legislative Candidate Statements Primary Election “Take Pride In Arizona... And Vote!” Citizens Clean Elections Commission Voter Education Guide Paid for by the Citizens Elections Fund Table of Contents Letter from the Chair of the Commission 2 Election & Voting Information 3 Early Voting 3 Notices 3 Alternate Formats 3 Cover Design 3 Toll Free Sun Sounds Number 4 Kids Voting Arizona 5 Arizona’s Citizens Clean Elections Act 6 The Citizens Clean Elections Commission 6 Citizens Clean Elections Commissioners 7 Citizens Clean Elections Commission Staff 7 Citizens Clean Elections Fund 8 Tax Credits 8 Candidate Debates 8 Description of Offices 9 Corporation Commission 9 Legislature 9 What Is My Legislative District? 9 Key to Using the Candidate Statements Pamphlet 10 Candidate Statements 10 Candidate Statement Pamphlet Primary Election Letter from the Chair of the Commission Dear Arizona Voters: The year 2004 is a major election year in Arizona. By voting in the Primary and General Elections this fall, you will be electing candidates for 4 statewide offices as Corporation Commissioners and 90 legislative seats. For the 90 legislative offices, you will be electing 30 Senators and 60 Representatives. This Candidate Statement Pamphlet is a nonpartisan, plain-language handbook published by the Citizens Clean Elections Commission, an independent state agency, to give you information about state elections. The Commission’s mission is to fairly, faithfully and fully implement and administer Arizona’s Citizens Clean Elections Act, which is a campaign finance reform measure initiated by Arizona citizens and passed by voters in 1998. The Act creates a new campaign financing system that provides full public funding to qualified state and legislative office candidates who agree to abide by the Citizens Clean Elections Act and Commission regulations.