DOCSLIB.ORG

Party and Non-Party Political Committees Vol. II State and Local Party Detailed Tables

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Party and Non-Party Political Committees Vol. II State and Local Party Detailed Tables FEC REPORTS ON FINANCIAL ACTIVITY 1989 - 1990 FINAL REPORT .. PARTY AND NON-PARTY POLITICAL COKMITTEES VOL.II STATE AND LOCAL PARTY DETAILED TABLES FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 999 E Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20463 OCTOBER 1991 I I I I I I I I FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION Commissioners John w. McGarry, Chairman Joan D. Aikens, Vice Chairman Lee Ann Elliott, Thomas J. Josefiak Danny L. McDonald Scott E. Thomas Donnald K. Anderson, Ex Officio Clerk of the u.s. House of Representatives Walter J. Stewart Secretary of the Senate John C. Surina, Staff Director Lawrence M. Noble, General Counsel Comments and inquiries about format should be addressed to the Reports Coordinator, Data System Development Division, who coordinated the production of this REPORT. Copies of 1989-1990 FINAL REPORT, PARTY AND NON-PARTY POLITICAL COMMITTEES, may be obtained b writing to the Public Records Office, Federal Election Commission, 999 E Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20463. Prices are: VOL. I - $10.00, VOL. II - $10.00, VOL. III - $10.00, VOL IV - $10.00. Checks should be made payable to the Federal Election Commission. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. DESCRIPTION OF REPORT iv II. SUMMARY OF TABLES vi III. EXPLANATION OF COLUMNS viii IV. TABLES: SELECTED FINANCIAL ACTIVITY AND ASSISTANCE TO CANDIDATES, DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN STATE AND LOCAL POLITICAL COMMITTEES A. SELECTED FINANCIAL ACTIVITY OF DEMOCRATIC STATE AND LOCAL POLITICAL COMMITTEES AND THEIR ASSISTANCE TO CANDIDATES BY OFFICE AND PARTY Alabama 1 Missouri 37 Colorado 7 New York 43 Idaho 13 Ohio 49 Kansas 19 South Dakota 55 Maryland 25 Virginia 61 Michigan 31 Wisconsin 67 SELECTED FINANCIAL ACTIVITY OF REPUBLICAN STATE AND LOCAL POLITICAL COMMITTEES AND THEIR ASSISTANCE TO CANDIDATES BY OFFICE AND PARTY Alabama 79 Missouri 121 Colorado 85 New York 127 Florida 97 North Dakota 133 Idaho 103 Pennsylvania 139 Kansas 109 Texas 145 Masasachusetts 115 Vermont 151 Minnesota 121 West Virginia 157 I DESCRIPTION OF REPORT PURPOSE: local major party committee, while VOLUME This study is designed to provide III (Corporate and Labor) and VOLUME IV information on the financial transactions (No Connected Organization, Trade of Democratic, Republican, and non-party Membership Health, Cooperative, political committees, with emphasis on Corporation Without Stock) do the same those transactions which support can­ for each non-party political committee. didates for Federal office, for the period which began on January 1, 1989. WHAT IS NOT INCLUDED: Political committees, which are entities This study only provides information registered with the Federal Election for the Democratic and Republican parties Commission, report their financial rather than for all party committees, activity to the Commission on a periodic both major and minor, which are basis. Information on receipts, registered with the Federal Election disbursements, and debts from these re­ Commission. The study does not contain ports has been entered into the all of the information reported by the Commission's computer system; programs committees. have been used to produce all TABLES included in this study. The TABLES are LIMITATIONS: organized into four VOLUMES. VOLUME I, This report is a final report SUMMARY TABLES, provides data for the designed to give a complete picture of Democratic and Republican national the financial activity which occurred political committees and Presidential during the 1989-1990 election cycle. convention committees, for all state and Available at the Commission for local major party committees by state inspection are microfilmed copies of the totals and overall total, and for all original reports which show information non-party committees by six group totals; as reported by the filers. The it also includes tables providing microfilmed public record is the official information on contributions made to record of the Federal Election candidates. VOLUME II, STATE AND LOCAL Commission. This final study is one of PARTY DETAILED TABLES, presents financial several tools which have been developed information for each registered state and to summarize the vast quantity of data -iv- available on the microfilmed public record. PERIOD COVERED: The beginning point for information in this study is committee reports on financial activity which occurred after December 31, 1988. As subsequent reports pertaining to 1989-90 activity were received during 1989, 1990, and 1991, the dollar figures contained on them were entered into the computer system and added to earlier information. The computer programs which produced this Re­ port's TABLES were run on August 23, 1991, and used certain 1989-1990 data which had been entered up to and including that date. -v- II SUMMARY OF TABLES The TABLES in this VOLUME are TABLE A, •sELECTED FINANCIAL designed to show selected information for ACTIVITY OF STATE AND LOCAL POLITICAL all registered Democratic and Republican CORKITTEES AND THEIR ASSISTANCE TO state and local party political CANDIDATES BY OFFICE AND PARTY,• displays committees.* (State and local party receipt, disbursement, and debt political committees are those committees information for Democratic and Republican that are part of the official party party committees. Total receipts and structure at the State, or local level, total disbursements, which are shown which have registered as political first in their respective places, are not committees under the Federal Election necessarily accurate reflections of the Campaign Act, as amended.) (Note that "real" money that is available for the 1979 Amendments to the Federal political campaign financing. These Election Campaign Act relax the figures are sometimes inflated, due in registration and reporting requirements large part to the fact that these sums for local party organizations by include receipts from affiliated modifying the definition of which committees. Net Receipts and net activities cause such an organization to disbursements, which appear next have become a political committee.)Also removed those transfers and are more provided, at the end of the listings of accurate measures of actual money raised state and local committees, is and spent. information for major party committees formed by Americans in foreign countries. The remaining information in this The EXPLANATIONS OF COLUMNS for national TABLE on specific types of receipts and and for state and local committees disbursements provides a partial picture provides detailed definitions of columns of a political committee's exact income and explanations of organization; they and spending. As was noted in the should be used in conjunction with the DESCRIPTION OF REPORT where the omitted TABLES. information was enumerated, the selected *This final study excludes party in order to avoid the double-counting of joint fundraising committees and all money, therefore, the study excludes financial activity which they have activity reported by the joint reported. The study already includes the fundraising committees themselves. net proceeds reported by the beneficaries of the joint fundraising -vi- receipts and disbursements do not add up to the total receipts and disbursements. TABLE A next provides a committee's "cash on hand" and debts figures. Amounts of its assistance to candidates* by Federal office and party, which are shown after "cash on hand" and debts, indicate its candidate activity. *Note that some of this assistance may have been to individuals who may not be statutory "candidates" under the 1979 Amendments to the Federal Election Campaign Act, e.g., an individual seeking nomination to Federal office who has not received contributions or made expenditures aggregating in excess of $5,000. -vii- III EXPLANATION OF COLUMNS STATE AND LOCAL PARTY POLITICAL COMMITTEES This section explains the special terms TOTAL RECEIPTS: that appear as labels of the different This column includes all incoming columns, how the amount is derived for funds reported on Line 18. each column and, where appropriate, the significance of the column. Words TOTAL INDIV CONTRIB: included in this section are listed in The sum of contributions from the order in which they appear in each individuals (both itemized and table. Readers are encouraged to unitemized) is reported here. Values are consult this section regularly as they taken from Line lla Column A of each use the report. report filed by the party committee. Readers should be aware that the terms as used in this report may be TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS: defined differently than they are in the This column includes all outgoing Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as funds reported by a political committee amended. on Line 28 - Total Disbursements. The line number and (where appropriate) the schedule letter of the BEGINNING CASH-ON-HAND: April 1988 FEC Form 3X on which the A political committee's "cash on receipt and disbursement information was hand" on January 1, 1989 (or its initial reported are given in 1989 "cash on hand" if it registered parenthesis. (Party political committees subsequent to 1/1/89) is given in this are those committees that are part of the column. This beginning cash balance is official party structure at the national, reported on Line 6. State, or local level, which have registered as political committees under LATEST CASH-ON-HAND: the Federal Election Campaign Act, as These amounts are a political amended.) committee's most recently reported 1990 "cash on hand." These balances are taken TABLE A STATE TOTALS OF SELECTED from Line 10 (Line 8). FINANCIAL ACTIVITY OF DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Accepted Resolutions Table of Contents Resolution 2020 – P1 4 Resolution Supporting the Electoral College
    Idaho Republican Party Accepted Resolutions 2020 Idaho Republican Party Accepted Resolutions 2020 Winter Meeting of the State Central Committee January 3 - 4, 2020 1 Idaho Republican Party Official Document Idaho Republican Party Accepted Resolutions 2020 Accepted Resolutions Table of Contents Resolution 2020 – P1 4 Resolution Supporting the Electoral College Resolution 2020 – P2 5 Resolution on Amending Idaho Code Section 59-904a Regarding Filling Legislative Vacancies Resolution 2020 – P3 6 Resolution Preserving Parents’ Freedom to Designate Religious Beliefs Regarding Sexual Behavior Education of their Minor Children Resolution 2020 – P5 7 Resolution to Decriminalize Cannabis Plants Known as Hemp Resolution 2020 – P6 9 Resolution Regarding Legislative Districts in Idaho Resolution 2020 – P7 10 Resolution Regarding the Redistricting Commission Resolution 2020 – P8 11 Resolution in Support of the Citizenship Question on the 2020 Census Form Resolution 2020 – P10 12 Resolution Regarding Children’s Health Resolution 2020 – P12 13 Resolution in Support of Returning the State of Idaho to a Republican form of Government Resolution 2020 - P14 15 Resolution Encouraging the Idaho Legislature to Repeal the Grocery Tax Resolution 2020 - P15 17 Resolution Supporting President Trump’s Efforts to Bring Our Troops Home Resolution 2020 - P16 20 Resolution Urging Congressional Hearings On The “Afghanistan Papers” And Gold Star Families Lawsuit Against Military Contractors Funding The Taliban Resolution 2020 - P17 22 Resolution Regarding the proposed
    [Show full text]
  • Regulating Our Mischievous Factions: Presidential Nominations and the Law Andrew Pierce Goldstein & Phillips
    Kentucky Law Journal Volume 78 | Issue 2 Article 4 1989 Regulating Our Mischievous Factions: Presidential Nominations and the Law Andrew Pierce Goldstein & Phillips Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj Part of the Election Law Commons Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you. Recommended Citation Pierce, Andrew (1989) "Regulating Our Mischievous Factions: Presidential Nominations and the Law," Kentucky Law Journal: Vol. 78 : Iss. 2 , Article 4. Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj/vol78/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kentucky Law Journal by an authorized editor of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Regulating Our Mischievous Factions: Presidential Nominations and the Law By ANDREW PIERCE* TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................. 312 I. BRIEF HISTORY OF PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATIONS ....... 314 II. PROCEDURAL AND SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES INVOLVED IN CHALLENGES TO PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION PROCEDURES .................................................... 316 A. Substantive Grounds for Challenging Party A ctions .................................................... 316 1. Constitutional Challenges ...................... 316 2. Statutory Challenges ............................. 318 3. Party Rules ......................................... 319 B. Procedural Issues ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Insider's Guidetoazpolitics
    olitics e to AZ P Insider’s Guid Political lists ARIZONA NEWS SERVICE ARIZONA CAPITOL TIMES • Arizona Capitol Reports FEATURING PROFILES of Arizona’s legislative & congressional districts, consultants & public policy advocates Statistical Trends The chicken Or the egg? WE’RE EXPERTS AT GETTING POLICY MAKERS TO SEE YOUR SIDE OF THE ISSUE. R&R Partners has a proven track record of using the combined power of lobbying, public relations and advertising experience to change both minds and policy. The political environment is dynamic and it takes a comprehensive approach to reach the right audience at the right time. With more than 50 years of combined experience, we’ve been helping our clients win, regardless of the political landscape. Find out what we can do for you. Call Jim Norton at 602-263-0086 or visit us at www.rrpartners.com. JIM NORTON JEFF GRAY KELSEY LUNDY STUART LUTHER 101 N. FIRST AVE., STE. 2900 Government & Deputy Director Deputy Director Government & Phoenix, AZ 85003 Public Affairs of Client Services of Client Public Affairs Director Development Associate CONTENTS Politics e to AZ ARIZONA NEWS SERVICE Insider’s Guid Political lists STAFF CONTACTS 04 ARIZONA NEWS SERVICE BEATING THE POLITICAL LEGISLATIVE Administration ODDS CONSULTANTS, DISTRICT Vice President & Publisher: ARIZONA CAPITOL TIMES • Arizona Capitol Reports Ginger L. Lamb Arizonans show PUBLIC POLICY PROFILES Business Manager: FEATURING PROFILES of Arizona’s legislative & congressional districts, consultants & public policy advocates they have ‘the juice’ ADVOCATES,
    [Show full text]
  • Gone Rogue: Time to Reform the Presidential Primary Debates
    Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy Discussion Paper Series #D-67, January 2012 Gone Rogue: Time to Reform the Presidential Primary Debates by Mark McKinnon Shorenstein Center Reidy Fellow, Fall 2011 Political Communications Strategist Vice Chairman Hill+Knowlton Strategies Research Assistant: Sacha Feinman © 2012 President and Fellows of Harvard College. All rights reserved. How would the course of history been altered had P.T. Barnum moderated the famed Lincoln-Douglas debates in 1858? Today’s ultimate showman and on-again, off-again presidential candidate Donald Trump invited the Republican presidential primary contenders to a debate he planned to moderate and broadcast over the Christmas holidays. One of a record 30 such debates and forums held or scheduled between May 2011 and March 2012, this, more than any of the previous debates, had the potential to be an embarrassing debacle. Trump “could do a lot of damage to somebody,” said Karl Rove, the architect of President George W. Bush’s 2000 and 2004 campaigns, in an interview with Greta Van Susteren of Fox News. “And I suspect it’s not going to be to the candidate that he’s leaning towards. This is a man who says himself that he is going to run— potentially run—for the president of the United States starting next May. Why do we have that person moderating a debate?” 1 Sen. John McCain of Arizona, the 2008 Republican nominee for president, also reacted: “I guarantee you, there are too many debates and we have lost the focus on what the candidates’ vision for America is..
    [Show full text]
  • Pro-Israel PAC Contributions to 2012 Candidates
    ELECTION WATCH By Janet McMahon More Secretive Than Stealth PACs: Super PACs and 501(c)(4)s Financing 2012 Presidential Race ith the exception of a measly W$250 given to former Republi - TOP TEN 2012 AND CAREER RECIPIENTS OF can presidential candidate and self- PRO -I SRAEL PAC F UNDS proclaimed intellectual Newt Gingrich, the two dozen-plus pro-Israel political Compiled by Hugh Galford action committees (PACs) whose con - tributions to 2012 federal candidates HOUSE: CURRENT RACES SENATE: CURRENT RACES are summarized on these pages made no contributions to candidates for the Ros-Lehtinen, Ileana (R-FL) $49,500 Berkley, Shelley (D-NV) $63,500 highest office of all —the presidency of Engel, Eliot L. (D-NY) 31,000 Casey, Robert P., Jr. (D-PA) 60,400 the United States. That this is not an Rothman, Steven R. (D-NJ) 30,000 Cardin, Benjamin L. (D-MD) 55,680 anomaly points to the fact that, as far Hoyer, Steny H. (D-MD) 29,250 Menendez, Robert (D-NJ) 55,000 as Israel is concerned, Congress is Berman, Howard L. (D-CA) 25,500 Klobuchar, Amy J. (D-MN) 45,000 where the action is —at least when it Wasserman-Schultz, Debbie (D-FL) 21,000 McCaskill, Claire (D-MO) 44,500 comes to money. Not only do the for - Lowey, Nita M. (D-NY) 18,000 Nelson, Bill (D-FL) 43,650 eign country’s acolytes in the House Andrews, Robert E. (D-NJ) 16,500 Stabenow, Debbie (D-MI) 39,800 and Senate make sure that Israel re - Smith, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Reuning Diss Final.Pdf
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of the Liberal Arts PARTY COALITIONS, PARTY IDEOLOGY, AND PARTY ACTION: EXTENDED PARTY NETWORKS IN THE UNITED STATES A Dissertation in Political Science by Kevin Reuning © 2018 Kevin Reuning Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2018 The dissertation of Kevin Reuning was reviewed and approved∗ by the following: Lee Ann Banaszak Professor of Political Science Dissertation Advisor, Chair of Committee Michael Berkman Professor of Political Science Bruce Desmarais Associate Professor of Political Science Michael Nelson Associate Professor of Political Science John McCarthy Professor of Sociology Glenn Palmer Professor of Political Science Director of Graduate Studies ∗Signatures are on file in the Graduate School. ii Abstract American political parties are not singular entities, but webs of interests that come together to gain power and implement policy. This has been noted by recent work, but there has been little theoretical focus on the implications of this parties as networks approach. My dissertation unpacks what it means for political parties to be networks and what the implications of this view are. I argue that because political parties are networks, the relationships that exist between groups within the network are critical in explaining variation in party ideology across the state parties. In addition, I argue that fracturing of a party network outside the legislature leads to a similar fracturing of the party caucus inside the legislature. To test these theories I use state legislative donation data from 2000 to 2016 to develop state donation networks. Using these networks I first show that relationships help to explain party ideology even when controlling for resources.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory -- Nomination Form
    Form No. 10-300 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS ________TYPE ALL ENTRIES - COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS_______ NAME HISTORIC William Edgar Borah Apartment, Number 21, Windsor Lodge AND/OR COMMON William Edgar Borah Apartment, Number 21, Chancellery Cooperative LOCATION STREET & NUMBER 2139-2141 Wyoming Avenue, NW. _NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Washington VICINITY OF STATE CODE COUNTY CODE District of Columbia 11 District of Columbia 001 CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE —DISTRICT —PUBLIC ^.OCCUPIED _AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM .XBUILDINGIS) ^.PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL _PARK —STRUCTURE —BOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT —IN PROCESS X.YES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED — YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION _NO —MILITARY ioTHER: apartment OWNER OF PROPERTY NAME Mr. and Mrs. Sidney Zabludoff, owners, Apartment Number 21 STREET & NUMBER 2139 Wyoming Avenue, NW, CITY, TOWN STATE Washington VICINITY OF District of Columbia LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY OF DEEos.ETc. Recorder of Deeds STREET & NUMBER 515 D Street, NW. CITY. TOWN STATE Washington District of Columbia REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE None DATE —FEDERAL —STATE —COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS CITY. TOWN STATE 151 DESCRIPTION; CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE —EXCELLENT —DETERIORATED —UNALTERED XORIGINALSITE J?GOOD —RUINS X-ALTERED MOVFP OATF —FAIR _ UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE From 1913 until about 1929 William E. Borah resided in apartment number 21 in the east section of this 16-unit structure, which is divided by a firewall to meet contemporary regulations permitting no more than 8 units per building.
    [Show full text]
  • REPUBLICAN PARTY, ET AL., Petitioners, V
    Nos. 19-1257 & 19-1258 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States MARK BRNOVICH, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ARIZONA, ET AL., Petitioners, v. DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, ET AL., Respondents. ARIZONA REPUBLICAN PARTY, ET AL., Petitioners, v. DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, ET AL., Respondents. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit BRIEF FOR PRIVATE PETITIONERS BRETT W. JOHNSON MICHAEL A. CARVIN COLIN P. AHLER Counsel of Record TRACY A. OLSON YAAKOV M. ROTH SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. ANTHONY J. DICK 400 E. Van Buren St. E. STEWART CROSLAND Suite 1900 STEPHEN J. KENNY Phoenix, AZ 85004 STEPHEN J. PETRANY JONES DAY 51 Louisiana Ave., NW Washington, D.C. 20001 (202) 879-3939 [email protected] Counsel for Petitioners i QUESTIONS PRESENTED Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act prohibits voting practices that “result[] in a denial or abridgement of the right of any citizen ... to vote on account of race or color.” 52 U.S.C. § 10301(a). Such a discriminatory “result” occurs if an election is not “equally open to participation” by racial minorities, giving them “less opportunity than other members of the electorate to participate in the political process and to elect representatives of their choice.” Id. § 10301(b). Arizona gives all citizens an equal opportunity to vote in person or by mail, and authorizes ballots to be turned in by a family member, household member, or caregiver. In the decision below, however, the Ninth Circuit held that Arizona violated § 2 by (1) requiring in-person voters to cast ballots in their assigned precincts; and (2) prohibiting “ballot-harvesting,” i.e., third-party collection and return of ballots.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014-I-04] Contact: Earl De Berge Research Director [email protected] Jim Haynes President/CEO [email protected]
    behavior research center’s Rocky Mountain Poll NEWS RELEASE [RMP 2014-I-04] Contact: Earl de Berge Research Director [email protected] Jim Haynes President/CEO [email protected] JOB PERFORMANCE RATINGS SENATOR McCAIN STILL IN A SLUMP SENATOR FLAKE RATINGS IMPROVE Phoenix, Arizona, February13, 2014 Should U.S. Senator John McCain (R-AZ) decide to run for re-election in 2016, he may face a tough struggle to convince voters to stay the course with him. Voter attitudes toward his performance in Washington remain sharply divided with 37 percent applauding his efforts but 33 percent giving him a thumbs down. What is more, the proportion rating his performance as “poor” rose to 33 percent in January from 26 percent this past summer. Another 23 percent classify his job performance as only “fair” which overall means that the combined percent who rate his performance as “fair” or “poor” stands at 56 percent. Perhaps more ominous to his chances for being re-nominated by his party for a sixth term, is the finding that the proportion of registered Republicans who rate his performance as “poor” rose to 38 percent in January from only 27 percent last summer. Simultaneously, the proportion of Republicans who gave him favorable job ratings fell to 34 percent from 38 percent last summer. Evidence that Senator McCain continues to cause some Republicans to scratch their heads was also seen recently when he was censored by the Arizona Republican Party for being “too associated with liberal Democrats.” The Senator responded to the censorship saying that he had a strong conservative voting record and that being censored by the party may only embolden him to seek a sixth term in 2016 when he turns 80.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION in the Period Immediately Following The
    CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION In the period immediately following the close of the Civil War, philanthropic endeavors were undertaken to reconstruct secessionist states, establish wide-scale peace among still- hostile factions, and develop efforts to enact social, legal, and educational support. This philanthropic era is characterized by the activities of a number of individual, denominational, organizational, including state and federal supporters that were subsequently responsible for engendering a Negro College Movement, which established institutions for providing freed slaves, and later, Negroes with advanced educational degrees. This dissertation studied: the genesis, unfolding, contributions, and demise issues in conjunction with the social, economic, and political forces that shaped one such institution in Harper’s Ferry (Jefferson County), West Virginia: Storer College, which was founded in 1865 as an outgrowth of several mission schools. By an Act of Congress, in 1868, the founders of Storer College initially were granted temporary use of four government buildings from which to create their campus.1 Over the next 90 years, until its closure in 1955, the college underwent four distinct developmental phases: (a) Mission School [Elementary], (b) Secondary Division, (c) a Secondary Expansion, and (d) Collegiate. Even today—as a result of another Act of Congress—it continues to exist, albeit in altered form: in 1960, the National Park Service branch of the United States Department of the Interior was named the legal curator of the 1 United States. Congress. Legislative, Department of War. An Act Providing for the Sale of Lands, Tenements, and Water Privileges Belonging to the United States at or Near Harpers Ferry, in the County of Jefferson, West Virginia (1868).
    [Show full text]
  • L, 6%M--Mmcn‘D Rzszp’> Committee - Federal Fund G P-P
    \ i March 22,2006 Lawrence H. Norton General Counsel Federal Election Commission N 999 E Street, NW 0 =?I e Washington, DC 20463 &% 0 grno=af? ‘E XPn Re: Complaint against Matt Brown for US Senate, Democratic Party of Hawaii, cr~ COZI-~~ Maine Democratic State Committee, and Massachusetts Democratic State L, 6%m--mmcn‘d rzszp’> Committee - Federal Fund g p-p L 3-0 0. r= Dear Mr. Norton: m 0. This Complaint is filed pursuant to 2 U.S.C..-__- 6 437g(a)(l) and 11 C.F.R. 0 111.4 by the --* J I -/ r&.e.. -: Republican State Parties of Hawaii.--~~~~;j-.b~ --._- - :and Rhode Island (collectively “Republican State Parties”) against Matt Brown for US Senate (“Brown Campaign”), the Democratic Party of Hawaii, Maine Democratic State Committee, and Massachusetts Democratic State Committee - Federal Fund. The information contained in this Complaint is based upon recent newspaper articles and information and belief. The newspaper articles are attached as Exhibit A. Introduction Matt Brown for US Senate is the principal campaign committee of MatthewaA Brown, a candidate for the Democratic nomination for US Senate from the State of Rhode Island. (See Exhibit B.) Richard Pelletier is the current field director for the Brown Campaign and the former Executive Director of the Maine Democratic Party. (See Exhibit A.) \ The Democratic Party of Hawaii (“HDP”) is the state party committee for the Democratic Party in the State of Hawaii. (See Exhibit C.) The Maine Democratic Party Committee (“ME Party”) is the state party committee for the Democratic Party in the State of Maine.
    [Show full text]
  • Janice Miriam Hellreich
    A. BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION AND QUALIFICATIONS 1. Name (Include any former names or nicknames used): Janice Miriam Hellreich (Current Married Name Since 1974) Janice Miriam Wills (Maiden Name) Janice Miriam Rodgers, aka Janice Miriam Wills Rodgers (First Married Name 1964-1974) I go by my middle name “Miriam” instead of my first name “Janice.” 2. Position to which nominated: Board of Directors, Corporation for Public Broadcasting 3. Date of Nomination: November 13, 2018 4. Address (List current place of residence and office addresses): Business: 40 Aulike Street, Suite 311, Kailua, HI 9673 5. Date and Place of Birth: July 13, 1944, Fort Payne, AL 6. Provide the name, position, and place of employment for your spouse (if married) and the names and ages of your children (including stepchildren and children by a previous marriage). Spouse: Philip David Hellreich, M.D., Kailua Dermatology & Associates, LTD. Children: Jennifer Bliss McNamee- 50 7. List all college and graduate degrees. Provide year and school attended. University of Alabama, B.A. 1965 University of Alabama, M.A. 1970 8. List all post-undergraduate employment and highlight all management-level jobs held and any non-managerial jobs that relate to the position for which you are nominated. Speech and Language Pathologist, Taipei American International School (1965- 1968) Speech and Language Pathologist, Maury County Public Schools (1970-1971) Preschool Teacher, Mother Rice KCAA Preschool (1972-1972) Speech and Language Pathologist, Preschool Home Care for the California- Hawaii Elks Major Project (1972-1975) 0 Speech and Language Pathologist (private practice, hospital contracts, physician and staff training, program development) (1980-1987) Speech and Language Pathologist, Speech & Language Pathology Associates, which merged into Kailua Dermatology in 1999 (1987- 2000) National Liaison, Linda Lingle’s Gubernatorial Campaign 2002 (2001-2002) Finance Director, Linda Lingle’s Hawaii Gubernatorial Re-Elect Campaign 2006 (2002-2006) Finance Director, Hawaii Lt.
    [Show full text]