DOCSLIB.ORG

Cape Lookout State Park Drainfield Relocation Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cape Lookout State Park Drainfield Relocation Project Final Environmental Assessment Cape Lookout State Park Drainfield Relocation Project Tillamook County, Oregon FEMA-1733-DR-OR (Public Assistance) July 2009 U.S. Department of Homeland Security FEMA Region X 130 228th Street SW Bothell, WA 98021 Final Environmental Assessment Cape Lookout State Park Drainfield Relocation Project Tillamook County, Oregon FEMA-1733-DR-OR (Public Assistance) Prepared for: U.S. Department of Homeland Security FEMA Region X 130 228th Street SW Bothell, WA 98021 Prepared by: EDAW, Inc. 710 Second Avenue, Suite 1000 Seattle, WA 98104 July 2009 FEMA Cape Lookout State Park Drainfield Relocation Project Contents 1.0 Purpose and Need for Action ...................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Authority ................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.3 Proposed Federal Action ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.4 Purpose and Need ................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.5 Related Activities .................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.6 Background and Location ....................................................................................................... 1-2 1.7 Scoping and Issue Summary ................................................................................................... 1-7 1.7.1 Scoping ............................................................................................................................ 1-7 2.0 Alternatives ................................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Alternatives Development ...................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Alternative Elements Eliminated From Further Consideration ....................................... 2-1 2.1.2 Alternative A - No Action ................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1.3 Alternative B - Proposed Action ...................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.4 Elements Common to Both Alternatives ......................................................................... 2-2 2.2 Summary of Effects ................................................................................................................ 2-3 3.0 Affected Environment & Environmental Consequences ............................................................ 3-1 3.1 Land Use ................................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1.1 Affected Environment ...................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.2 Threshold of Significance ................................................................................................ 3-4 3.1.3 Environmental Consequences .......................................................................................... 3-4 3.2 Geology, Soils, and Shoreline Stability .................................................................................. 3-6 3.2.1 Affected Environment ...................................................................................................... 3-6 3.2.2 Threshold of Significance ................................................................................................ 3-9 3.2.3 Environmental Consequences .......................................................................................... 3-9 3.3 Hydrology and Water Quality ............................................................................................... 3-11 3.3.1 Affected Environment .................................................................................................... 3-11 3.3.2 Threshold of Significance .............................................................................................. 3-15 3.3.3 Environmental Consequences ........................................................................................ 3-16 3.4 Vegetation and Wetlands ...................................................................................................... 3-18 3.4.1 Affected Environment .................................................................................................... 3-18 3.4.2 Threshold of Significance .............................................................................................. 3-23 3.4.3 Environmental Consequences ........................................................................................ 3-23 3.5 Fish and Wildlife ................................................................................................................... 3-28 3.5.1 Affected Environment .................................................................................................... 3-28 3.5.2 Threshold of Significance .............................................................................................. 3-35 3.5.3 Environmental Consequences ........................................................................................ 3-35 3.6 Threatened and Endangered Species .................................................................................... 3-38 3.6.1 Affected Environment .................................................................................................... 3-38 3.6.2 Threshold of Significance .............................................................................................. 3-42 3.6.3 Environmental Consequences ........................................................................................ 3-42 3.7 Recreation ............................................................................................................................. 3-45 3.7.1 Affected Environment .................................................................................................... 3-45 3.7.2 Threshold of Significance .............................................................................................. 3-46 Final Environmental Assessment i FEMA Cape Lookout State Park Drainfield Relocation Project 3.7.3 Environmental Consequences ........................................................................................ 3-46 3.8 Visual Resources ................................................................................................................... 3-48 3.8.1 Affected Environment .................................................................................................... 3-48 3.8.2 Threshold of Significance .............................................................................................. 3-50 3.8.3 Environmental Consequences ........................................................................................ 3-50 3.9 Environmental Justice ........................................................................................................... 3-52 3.9.1 Affected Environment and Regulatory Setting .............................................................. 3-52 3.9.2 Threshold of Significance .............................................................................................. 3-52 3.9.3 Environmental Consequences ........................................................................................ 3-53 3.10 Cultural and Historical Resources ...................................................................................... 3-54 3.10.1 Affected Environment .................................................................................................. 3-54 3.10.2 Thresholds of Significance .......................................................................................... 3-60 3.10.3 Environmental Consequences ...................................................................................... 3-61 3.11 Transportation and Access .................................................................................................. 3-63 3.11.1 Affected Environment .................................................................................................. 3-63 3.11.2 Threshold of Significance ............................................................................................ 3-64 3.11.3 Environmental Consequences ...................................................................................... 3-64 3.12 Cumulative Effects .............................................................................................................. 3-68 4.0 Consultation and Coordination ................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Public Involvement ................................................................................................................. 4-1 4.1.1 Comments on the Draft EA.............................................................................................. 4-1 4.2 Agency Consultation and Coordination .................................................................................. 4-1 4.2.1 Endangered Species Act .................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2019 Oregon Administrative Rules Compilation
    2019 OREGON ADMINISTRATIVE RULES COMPILATION CHAPTER 736 Parks and Recreation Department Published By DENNIS RICHARDSON Secretary of State Copyright 2019 Office of the Secretary of State Rules effective as of January 01, 2019 DIVISION 1 PROCEDURAL RULES 736-001-0000 Notice of Proposed Rules 736-001-0005 Model Rules of Procedure 736-001-0030 Fees for Public Records DIVISION 2 ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITIES 736-002-0010 State Park Cooperating Associations 736-002-0015 Working with Donor Organizations 736-002-0020 Criminal Records Checks 736-002-0030 Definitions 736-002-0038 Designated Positions: Authorized Designee and Contact Person 736-002-0042 Criminal Records Check Process 736-002-0050 Preliminary Fitness Determination. 736-002-0052 Hiring or Appointing on a Preliminary Basis 736-002-0058 Final Fitness Determination 736-002-0070 Crimes Considered 736-002-0102 Appealing a Fitness Determination 736-002-0150 Recordkeeping, Confidentiality, and Retention 736-002-0160 Fees DIVISION 3 WILLAMETTE RIVER GREENWAY PLAN 736-003-0005 Willamette River Greenway Plan DIVISION 4 DISTRIBUTION OF ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE FUNDSTO PUBLIC AND PRIVATELY OWNED LANDMANAGERS, ATV CLUBS AND ORGANIZATIONS 736-004-0005 Purpose of Rule 736-004-0010 Statutory Authority 736-004-0015 Definitions 736-004-0020 ATV Grant Program: Apportionment of Monies 736-004-0025 Grant Application Eligibility and Requirements 736-004-0030 Project Administration 736-004-0035 Establishment of the ATV Advisory Committee 736-004-0045 ATV Operating Permit Agent Application and Privileges 736-004-0060
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Shore Management Plan
    Ocean Shore Management Plan Oregon Parks and Recreation Department January 2005 Ocean Shore Management Plan Oregon Parks and Recreation Department January 2005 Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Planning Section 725 Summer Street NE Suite C Salem Oregon 97301 Kathy Schutt: Project Manager Contributions by OPRD staff: Michelle Michaud Terry Bergerson Nancy Niedernhofer Jean Thompson Robert Smith Steve Williams Tammy Baumann Coastal Area and Park Managers Table of Contents Planning for Oregon’s Ocean Shore: Executive Summary .......................................................................... 1 Chapter One Introduction.................................................................................................................. 9 Chapter Two Ocean Shore Management Goals.............................................................................19 Chapter Three Balancing the Demands: Natural Resource Management .......................................23 Chapter Four Balancing the Demands: Cultural/Historic Resource Management .........................29 Chapter Five Balancing the Demands: Scenic Resource Management.........................................33 Chapter Six Balancing the Demands: Recreational Use and Management .................................39 Chapter Seven Beach Access............................................................................................................57 Chapter Eight Beach Safety .............................................................................................................71
    [Show full text]
  • Highway 131 Transportation Refinement Plan
    HighwayHighway 131131 TransportationTransportation RefiRefi nementnement PlanPlan PREPARED FOR: Economic Development Council of Tillamook County Tillamook County Department of Community Development Oregon Department of Transportation PREPARED BY: JuneJune 20072007 TB052007004PDX 352200.02.10 5/18/07 kw CONTENTS Section Page Figures Page 1 Introduction...................................................................................... 1 1 Highway 131 Study Area .................................................................1 2 Advisory Committee Meeting (February 2007).............................2 2 Planning Process.............................................................................. 2 3 Existing Conditions Field Review...................................................5 4 Modified Circulation of Wayside and Pacific Avenue.................7 3 Recommendations........................................................................... 7 5 Oceanside Improvement Concepts .................................................9 Oceanside Improvement Concepts................................................ 7 6 Example of a Gateway Feature (Astoria, OR)..............................10 Netarts Improvement Concepts ................................................... 12 7 Typical Bicycle Rack Designs.........................................................10 Corridor Improvement Concepts................................................. 16 8 Example of a Slow Street (Newport, OR).....................................11 9 Netarts Improvement Concepts
    [Show full text]
  • On Foot Scampering Over Tree Roots
    5. Netarts/Happy Camp Beaches Safety & Etiquette Netarts has two good beach access points, 7-9 Cape Lookout • Pack it in, pack it out. Cape to Cape with restrooms at both. Just north of the These hikes are longer and more • Keep dogs on leash. village of Netarts, take Happy Camp Road ! strenuous than the other hikes in this • Watch children closely. west down the hill. At the end of the road you guide. Be prepared for muddy sections and • Do not climb cliffs or walk out will find a gravel parking lot near the mouth on Foot scampering over tree roots. Wear good onto rock faces. of Netarts Bay. From the parking lot, you can shoes, carry water, and plan for unpredictable Netarts Area Trails and Beach Walks • Be prepared for sudden walk to the south along the bay or to the changes in weather. Cape Lookout can be weather changes. from Cape Meares to Cape Lookout north with great views of Three Arch Rocks. very windy or become shrouded in fog quickly. This area has strong tidal currents and is • Watch for sneaker waves. unsafe for swimming. Jim Young In Netarts, turn west off the main highway 7. North Trail at Netarts Bay Drive. You will immediately Jim Young see Netarts Bay and the County Boat Ramp North Trail crosses the cape and follows the parking lot. From the lot, walk west about coastline north 2.3 miles (4.6 miles round-trip) 100 yards to the bay beach. A day-use through the shaded forest and down to the parking fee is required.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Day Trip Ideas
    RBCC & Visitors Center Come visit the Oceans Edge… Best Day Trip Ideas If you’ve wondered where you can get a real beach experience where the sand, sea and air are the main attractions, then Rockaway Beach is your answer! If you’re a sportsman looking for some of the best hunting, deep-sea or freshwater fishing, then Rockaway Beach is your answer! If you’re looking for a change of pace, where the simple things like clamming, beachcombing, bonfires, building sand castles or watching the sun as it sets are still fun, then Rockaway Beach is your answer! Rockaway Beach: The town has been a destination for vacationers since the early 1900s. It is small and friendly with a quaint downtown area where you can find a variety of shops and restaurants. The atmosphere is calm and unhurried, a perfect place to relax. Rockaway Beach offers more than 200 places to stay and many different types of accommodations. We offer lodging to fit everyone’s needs and any size family. Artisans, restaurants and more… Special events: Kite Festival, Pirate Festival, Fireworks on the Fourth of July, Fire Festival, Arts & Crafts Festival and many more. Restaurants: Enjoy the taste of the coast. Relax with your favorite espresso drink at a sidewalk cafe, savor fresh Pacific seafood seasoned with Jacobson Sea Salts, and other delights at the neighborhood restaurants. Sample our local Oregon bounty, including CSA produce, local milk from Bennett Farms, Old Oregon Smokehouse fresh-smoked fish or Sea Breeze ice cream. Choose formal oceanfront dining or Lions hot dogs and Kettle corn at the Ocean’s Edge.
    [Show full text]
  • Permanent Administrative Order
    OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE ARCHIVES DIVISION SHEMIA FAGAN STEPHANIE CLARK SECRETARY OF STATE DIRECTOR CHERYL MYERS 800 SUMMER STREET NE DEPUTY SECRETARY OF STATE SALEM, OR 97310 503-373-0701 PERMANENT ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER FILED 06/25/2021 9:30 AM PRD 5-2021 ARCHIVES DIVISION CHAPTER 736 SECRETARY OF STATE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT & LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL FILING CAPTION: Adds Pilot Butte State Scenic Viewpoint Master Plan to list of adopted Master Plans EFFECTIVE DATE: 06/25/2021 AGENCY APPROVED DATE: 06/23/2021 CONTACT: Helena Kesch 725 Summer St NE Filed By: 503-881-4637 Salem,OR 97301 Helena Kesch [email protected] Rules Coordinator AMEND: 736-018-0045 RULE TITLE: Adopted State Park Master Plan Documents NOTICE FILED DATE: 03/16/2021 RULE SUMMARY: Adds Pilot Butte State Scenic Viewpoint Master Plan to list of adopted Master Plans RULE TEXT: (1) The following state park master plan documents have been adopted and incorporated by reference into this division: (a) Fort Stevens State Park Master Plan, as amended in 2001; (b) Cape Lookout State Park, amended in 2012 as Cape Lookout State Park Comprehensive Plan; (c) Cape Kiwanda State Park, renamed as Cape Kiwanda State Natural Area; (d) Nestucca Spit State Park, renamed as Robert Straub State Park; (e) Jessie M. Honeyman Memorial State Park as amended in 2009; (f) Columbia River Gorge Management Units Plan, including: Lewis and Clark State Recreation Site, Dabney State Recreation Area, Portland Womens' Forum State Scenic Viewpoint, Crown Point State Scenic Corridor, Guy W. Talbot State Park, George W. Joseph State Natural Area, Rooster Rock State Park, Shepperd's Dell State Natural Area, Bridal Veil Falls State Scenic Viewpoint, Dalton Point State Recreation Site, Benson State Recreation Area, Ainsworth State Park, McLoughlin State Natural Area, John B.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon State Parks
    iocuN OR I Hi ,tP7x OREGON STATE PARKS HISTORY 1917-1963 \STATE/ COMPILED by CHESTER H. ARMSTRONG JULY I. 1965 The actual date of the i is less than thirty years ag older, supported by a few o were an innovation as so lit The Oregon parks system o beautification advocated b: Governors, the early State ] neers. The records reveal out areas, made favorable were generous with their Roy A. Klein, State Highk& ary 29, 1932, as a leader wl The state parks system thought of highway beauti many highway users who h who could not well afford t] In the park story we fii the many influential people complete, it is necessary to thought or trend in the idea the thought of highway be, may see and follow the trai present state narks system. In the preparation of th $ been examined. It was neck ing to property acquisitions deeds and agreements. as tln records of the Parks Divisik Excellent information h; State Parks and Recreatioi A Public Relations Office. As many etbers. I Preface The actual date of the founding of the Oregon State Parks System is less than thirty years ago but the fundamental principles are much older, supported by a few of the leading park people of that time. They were an innovation as so little had been done by any state in the Union. The Oregon parks system owes its beginning to the thought of highway beautification advocated by many leaders of the state, including the Governors, the early State Highway Commissioners and Highway Engi- neers.
    [Show full text]
  • Trees to Sea Highway 6/131 Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan
    “Trees to Sea” “Trees to Sea” “Trees to Sea” “Trees to Sea” TREES TO SEA HIGHWAY 6/131 SCENIC BYWAY CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PLAN SUBMITTED BY THE OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY WASHINGTON COUNTY VISITORS ASSOCIATION VISIT TILLAMOOK COAST January 22, 2018 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Trees to Sea Scenic Byway Working Group wishes to acknowledge the following individuals and agencies. Contributions made by their representatives in development of this plan are invaluable and much appreciated. Oregon Department of Forestry: Tillamook Forest Center Directors - Fran McReynolds, Jim Quiring Area and Districts - Kate Skinner, Tillamook District Forester; Barbara Moore, Assistant Tillamook District Forester; Don Everingham, Assistant to the Northwest Oregon Director; Ron Zilli, State Forests Field and Policy Manager; Mike Cafferata, Forest Grove District Forester; and Wayne Auble, Forest Grove Assistant District Forester Oregon Department of Transportation Byways Program - Pat Moran, Scenic Byway Program Manager Oregon Department of Transportation, Region 2 Tillamook County Commissioners City of Tillamook City Council Visit Tillamook Coast - Nan Devlin, Tourism Director Tillamook Area Chamber of Commerce – Justin Aufdermauer, Executive Director Tillamook Estuaries Partnership - Lisa Phipps, Executive Director City of Banks City Council Banks Chamber of Commerce – Ray Deeth, President Washington County Commissioners Washington County Visitors Association - Carolyn McCormick, President and CEO Oregon Coast Visitors Association – Marcus Hinz, Executive Director Tillamook Forest Heritage Trust - Ross Holloway, Executive Director Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife – Chris Knutsen, Watershed District Manager Planning Consultant - Jeannell Wyntergreen, Principal of the Wyntergreen Company TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction III. Appendices I. Route Description: page 6 1. Letters of support from agencies with land use planning authority along the route indicating Driving Directions: page 6 support of route and corridor management plan: page 31 Corridor Map: page 6 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Netarts Water Trail Guidebook
    YOU HAVE ARRIVED! SCROLL DOWN TO FIND YOUR MOST CURRENT DRAFT This page does not print tillamook county water trail OREGON neTARTS WATERSHED Produced by the Tillamook Estuaries Partnership WelcomeWelcome to the Nehalemto Netarts Bay With the publication of the Netarts Bay water trail guidebook, a chapter closes for the local water trail community. It was over ten years ago that the Tillamook County Water Trail (TCWT) vision was brought forth. Since then, the five watersheds of Tillamook County have been celebrated through four guidebooks which reveal the uniqueness and similarities of local waterways and entice paddlers to explore further. Though the guidebooks are now complete, it is not the end of this endeavor. It will be exciting to see what blossoms from this experience and the efforts inspired by water trail enthusiasts. The TCWT has been a huge success, offering information that may not otherwise get into the hands of visitors, residents, and non-motorized paddlers. This project demonstrates that stewardship can happen in a thoughtful way, gently guiding folks in a direction of a healthy environment, while balancing recreation, community, and economy. Netarts Bay invites one to slow down, breathe deeply, and take a closer look. The bay is relatively small at just under four square miles. There are 14 streams and tributaries that encompass the entire 19 square mile watershed. Some wander through wetlands and others flow directly to the bay. The small community of Netarts Don Best, Best Impressions Picture Co. Don Best, lies at the north end of the bay and neighboring Oceanside is close by.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Natural Areas Plan
    Portland State University PDXScholar Institute for Natural Resources Publications Institute for Natural Resources - Portland 2010 Oregon Natural Areas Plan Oregon Natural Heritage Advisory Council Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/naturalresources_pub Part of the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, and the Sustainability Commons Citation Details Oregon Natural Heritage Advisory Council. 2010. Oregon Natural Areas Plan. Oregon Biodiversity Information Center, Institute for Natural Resources – Portland, Portland State University, Portland, OR. 198pp. This Technical Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Institute for Natural Resources Publications by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Oregon Natural Areas Plan 2010 Natural Heritage Advisory Council to the State Land Board State Land Board Kate Brown Ted Kulongoski Ted Wheeler Secretary of State Governor State Treasurer Natural Heritage Advisory Council Voting Members Richard Brown Robert Chandler Stuart Garrett Charles Carter Alan Dickman Cathy Macdonald Ex-Officio Members Agriculture Director: Katy Coba, represented by Rebecca Currin Fish and Wildlife Director: Roy Elicker, represented by Holly Michaels Forestry Director: Marvin Brown, represented by Andrew Yost Higher Education Chancellor: George Pernsteiner, represented by Scott Heppell Parks and Recreation Director: Tim Wood,
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Analysis of Outdoor Recreation in Oregon Executive Summary
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF OUTDOOR RECREATION IN OREGON EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Across all of Oregon, there are thousands of recreation sites and opportunities where one can hike, HOW THIS COMPARES TO OTHER ANALYSES camp, bike, picnic, hunt, kite surf, and more; and every year, billions of dollars are spent by folks enjoying Oregon’s outdoors. Recognizing that outdoor recreation is a major contributor to the state’s economy, This analysis is consistent with findings from other research conducted on Oregon’s outdoor recreation economy. In Travel Oregon, the Oregon Office of Outdoor Recreation (OREC), and Oregon Department of Fish and 2017, the Outdoor Industry Association estimated that $16.4 billion was spent on outdoor recreation trips and gear Wildlife (ODFW) came together to commission a study on the impacts of the outdoor recreation economy. purchases in Oregon, an estimate slightly higher than the one presented here. The U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) estimated that spending on outdoor recreation in Oregon in 2019 contributed $7.2 billion to Oregon’s GDP and The study found that in 2019, outdoor recreation in Oregon supported $15.6 billion in spending. supported 88,000 jobs. While these estimates vary from the findings of this analysis, it is important to understand Consumer spending on outdoor recreation supports businesses and jobs throughout the state, and then that the BEA analysis does not consider local recreation in their analysis, making the results more comparable to the ripples throughout Oregon’s economy as business income and wages are re-spent, causing economic visitor expenditure estimate presented earlier. effects in sectors not directly tied to outdoor recreation.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Economic Analysis of Critical Habitat Designation for the Western Snowy Plover
    DRAFT ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF CRITICAL HABITAT DESIGNATION FOR THE WESTERN SNOWY PLOVER July 20, 2005 Draft – July 20, 2005 This page intentionally left blank. Prepared for: Division of Economics U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 4401 N. Fairfax Drive Arlington, VA 22203 Prepared By: Industrial Economics, Incorporated 2067 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02140 Draft – July 20, 2005 This page intentionally left blank. Draft – July 20, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...........................................................................................ES-1 1 FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYSIS...................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Approach to Estimating Economic Effects.............................................. 1-2 1.2 Scope of the Analysis............................................................................... 1-6 1.3 Analytic Time Frame ............................................................................. 1-10 1.4 Information Sources............................................................................... 1-10 1.5 Structure of Report................................................................................. 1-11 2 BACKGROUND AND SOCIOECONOMIC OVERVIEW............................... 2-1 2.1 Description of Species and Habitat.......................................................... 2-1 2.2 Background of Western Snowy Plover Critical Habitat Designation .............................................................................................. 2-2 2.3 Proposed Critical
    [Show full text]