Introduction 1. Businessweek, June 26, 1989. 2. Businessweek, July 17
Notes Introduction 1. Businessweek, June 26, 1989. 2. Businessweek, July 17,1989. 3. Clyde Prestowitz, Trading Places, pp. 11, 27. 4. Japan 1989: An International Comparison. 5. Ibid. 6. See Eugene Kaplan, Japan: The Government-Business Relationship for the most detailed account of this thesis. See Marvin Wolf, The Japanese Conspiracy, for a highly polemical version. 7. For the best account see Hugh Patrick and Henry Rosovsky, Japan: The New Economic Giant. • 8. Akio Morita and Shintaro Ishihara, The Japan That Can Say No, xeroxed copy. 9. Ibid., pp. 8-14, 19-26,52-60. The growing emotionalism with which Japanese respond to foreign criticism of Japanese neomercantilism is vividly reflected in the chapters by Ishihara, who makes a range of unfounded and/or highly irresponsible assertions such as "the roots of the US - Japan friction lie in the soil of racial prejudice", "Americans behave more like mad dogs than watchdogs", "the only reason why they could use the atomic bomb on Japan was because of their racial attitude toward Japan", "the US Congress is too hysterical to trust", or "Americans suggest the possible physical occupation of Japan in case Japan engages in semiconductor trade with the Soviet Union". Ibid., pp. 11, 12, 18, 52, 65. 10. Japan 1989. 11. Economist, April 29, 1989. 12. See William Nester, The Foundations 0/ Japanese Power, 1990. 13. Chalmers Johnson, The Industrial Policy Debate, p.5. 14. Yamamura, 1989. 15. Mordechai E., Keirinin, "How Closed is Japan's Market?: Additional Evidence", World Economy, vol.11, no. 4, July 1989, p.539. 16. Economist, September 6, 1989.
[Show full text]