Open Or Right-Click to Download PDF File

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Open Or Right-Click to Download PDF File . -. '~~~'", ' '" ". , I . OPPERt· MERION TOWNSHIP. WINTERING 1777/78 THE 'HISfORy'OF. J .. PETER MUHLENBERG'S HEADQUARTERS:.:" BY .', . Beth Ann Twiss ~.. ,'. t': ~ WINTERING 1777/78 The History of Peter Muhlenberg's Headquarters Beth Ann Twiss History 300D Honors Thesis / Penn TABLE OF CONTENTS, Page 1. ARRIVAL AT VALLEY FORGE • 1 II. HISTORY OF MOORE HOUSE 5 \11. PETER MUHLENBERG'S WINTER 18 IV. CONCLUSION . 23 APPENDIX A. MOORE FAMILY TREE 25 APPENDIX B.. PLk~S 27 APPENDIX C. PICTURES 34 APPENDIX D.MAP 40 BIBLIOGRAPHY . 42 .--. I. ARRIVAL AT VALLEY FORGE On October 29, 1777, orders were issued to the Continental 1 Army to be ready at a moment's notice to march to winter quarters. Despite continual repetition of these orders, the troops did not leave that day or the next day. Not until November 11 did the Army begin to move north and west out· of the immediate Philadelphia area. It crossed the Schuylkill River at Swedesford, spent the night on the Gulph Hills, and finally arrived at its. destination~ Valley Forge, on December 12. The choice of Valley Forge for winter quarters had not been an unanimous decision of the officers; rather, it was a compromise. General George Washington wished to go to Wilmington~ Delaware in order that the Army could conduct guerrilla warfare against the BritishJwho were entrenched in Philadelphia. However, Brigadier-general Peter Muhlenberg suggested Reading, Pennsylvania to Washington in a letter of December 1.2 While Muhlenberg agreed tha tit would be beneficial to "annoy" the enemy, 3 he thought that other disadvantages outweighed this small gain. In Wilmington, the British Army would be too close for comfort, especially since the American Army would inevitably dwindle in 1 "Orderly Book of General John Peter Gabriel Muhlenberg, March 26- December 20, 1777," The Pennsylvania I-Iagazine of His tory and Biography, XXXV (1911), 162. 2Worthington Chauncey Ford, "Defenses of Philadelphia in 1777," The Pennsylvania Magazine, XX (1896),398-400. 3Ibid., 398. I'~" '-.- ,,' '''.'- .... -.' 2 numbers during the winter. He recommended Reading because from there the Americans could prevent the sacking of New Jersey and quickly reach New York if the British should suddenly switch the base of their operations., Perhaps the Continental Army even could be split between Reading and either Lancaster or Easton. Easton offered the additional advantage of further distance from Philadelphia. Thus, there would be .f'ewe;("- '1s&s refugees from Philadelphia whom the Army would have to protect, and there would; be more available housing for· the sick. But with the final choice of Valley Forge, another advantage was accrued. The Army CQuld 4 keep the land secure from British foragers. Yet, the installation of the American Ar~y ruined this land and hurt the people who lived there, for the troops were short of supplies. Even before the Army had arrived at Valley Forge, this problem had manifested itself.', In November, Washington haJ announced a reward to " ..' - whomever could "Produce the Best Substitute for shoes made out of Raw Hides. ,,5 In fact, the shortage of shoes had been a factor in the deci­ sion to quarter the troops rather than conduct a winter campaign.6 Attempting to alleviate shortages while at Valley Forge, the soldiers 7 took food, timber, fences, and animals from the farmer residents. This practice started as soon as the Army arrived, and -it began to build houses for the camp. 4 "Orderly Book of Muhlenberg," 300. SIbid., 184. 6Worthington Chauncey Ford, "Defenses of Philadelphia, in 1777," The Pennsylvania Magazine, XXI (1897), 54. 7Henry Woodman, The History of Valley Forge (Oaks, Pa.: John U. Frances, Sr., 1920), p. 74. 3 The huts J?uil t to h()use the soldiers were explici tlydescribed 8 in the orders of December 18. The brigadier-generals appointed field officers for each regiment to supervise the construction. The regiment was then divided into squads o·ftwelve men, each with a set of tools ~ A twelve-dollar reward would be given .to the squad which built their hut in "the most Nicest and most W~rkmanshiplike Manner.,,9 Dimensions were set at fourteen by sixteen feet with wood and clay walls eighteen inches thicK and six and a half fee thigh. A door atone end would balance the clay fireplace at the other. Due toa wood shortage, Washington desired an alternative to clapboards. on the walls. Therefore, an one hundred-dollar reward was offered· to anyone who .could devise a cheap substitute. Further,when cutting firewood, trunks of trees that 10 measured sixteen,to eighteen feet were to be saved. Officers were to , \ prevent vandalism ~f the camp. However, despite these precautions, the Army had to rely heavily 11 on the inhabitants. Straw was levied for beds, but·often provisions were acquired through plunder. The troops stole food, and some iocal houses were destroyed for timber. By the end of the encampment, a few c1t1zens. were ask' 1ng f or rest1tut1on... 12 When the Army left in May, its mark remained on the land. 8 "Orderly Book of Muhlenberg," 301-2. 9Ibid., 302. 10Ibid. Order of December 20, 1777. llIbid. l2William J. Buck, History of Montgomery County (Norristown: E.L. Acker, 1859), p. 55. 4 The fields are destitute of vegetation and the lands~ once so highly productive~ lie uncultivated and without enclosure. The trees of the forest are cut dmm and nothing but the stumps left remaining . • • 13 . Another imposition on the inhabitants was the quartering of the of ficers • While the lower rank:i.ugoffic.er.s had huts a t the ;-ear of the regiments, the higher ranking officers were stationed in various· residences surrounding and within the campground. For instance~ Washington ,?perated out of the modest home of Issac Potts on the north- west corner of the encampment. Brigadier-general Muhlenberg) on the 14 other hand, stayed at the small Moore residence on Trout Run, a half a mile southeast of the most eastern entrenchments. The area was occupied by the brigades of Patterson and Weedon as well as.by those of Muhlenberg. They all were protected by the forts of two locals, \ \. 15 Mordecai and John Moore. ,. • -, 13Woodman~ History of Valley Forge, 92. Woodman was the descendant of a resident and wrote this account in 1850. l4Trout Run is also called Mashi~c Creek, and some trout do still live there despite industrial surroundings. 15 See map of Valley Forge Encampment, Appendix D. 5 II. HISTORY OF MOORE HOUSE The Moore family of which Mordecai and John Moore were descendants arrived in Upper Merion Township from England in the early eighteenth century. At that time, mos t o·f the township was part of Le ti tia Penn's Manor of Mount Joy. Her father originally deeded her 5000 acres in 1683, but in subsequent years, Letitia and her husband, William Aubrey, l acquired additional adjoining tracts. However, shortly after the turn of the century,· the Aubreys began to sell portions of the Manor to . 2 settlers. John Moore, "described in the conveyance as a carpenter," bought 400 acres of this land from a David Powell in 1709. Within the next seventy years, the land passed through three 3 generations of the .. Moore family. When the firs t John 1100re died was not certain, but in.l7lS, an Orphan's Court petition was filed in Philadelphia County for a John Moore. Perhaps this John was the original settler's son, because in 1734, a John Moore owned ISO acres of Upper 4 Merion land indicating a division of the 400-acre plot.. This son of the settler probably died sometime in the mid-1700's. In fact, the 1 John H. Reed, "Benjamin Eastburn," The Bulletin of the Historical Society of Montgomery County, XVI (Spring, 1967), p. 301. 2Ellwood Roberts, ed., Biographical Annals of 110ntgomery County, Pennsylvania, Vol. ~ (New York: T.S. Benham and Co. and Lewis Publish­ ing Co., 1904), p. 497. 4J •Do Scott, Combination Atlas Map of Montgomery County, Pennsyl­ vania (Philadelphi~/: J.L. Smith, 1877), po 26. 6 Philadelphia Index of Wills and Administrations did record a will of a John Moore in l7~6. His tract of land then would have passed to his son, another namesake. This John Moore owned 294 acres at his death on 5 January 1, 1778. It was he for whom a fort at Valley Forge was named, 6 and it was his home in which General Muhlenberg was quartered. John's house was cramped with his family of five children and the General, for it consisted of only one room with a full basement and 7 garret. The earliest description of this building was in the Window 8 Pane Tax o·f 1798,) ". at which time the house was owned by Richard Moore, John v s son. Yet, undoubtedly, this was the building in which Muhlenberg stayed because .it was probably built before 1750. While there was no documentaty evidence of the construction date, the small size, irregular plan, and asymmetrical facade suggested an early date. Building in the , \ ". first half of the 'eighteenth century, especially by rural people,- tended " to meet personal exigencies rather than following aesthetic principles. Therefore, it was not rare to find houses which did not follow the early Georgian style of absolute symmetry and multiple rooms. Either the 5 The number of acres are stated in Deed Book 3, page 193, in Montgomery County, and the death date is verified by many of the authors, including Edward Hocker and Henry Woodman. 6 Though I found no writings by Muhlenberg which mentioned the Moores or his soujourn in their home, all of the secondary sources r read said that Muhlenberg stayed in the Moore house.
Recommended publications
  • March 2012 · Volume 5, Issue 3
    Park News National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior The official newspaper of National Mall and Memorial Parks March 2012 · Volume 5, Issue 3 Activities 2 Cherry Blossom Festival 4 Plan Your Visit 8 Cherry Blossom Centennial Cherry Tree Rebellion Ranger Brad Berger Ranger JoAnn Garcia arch 27, 2012 marks the 100th anniversary isitors strolling to the Thomas Jefferson Me- Mof the ceremonial planting of Japanese Vmorial along the Tidal Basin when the cherry flowering cherry trees along the Tidal Basin by trees are in full bloom enjoy a spectacular view. First Lady Helen Taft and the Viscountess Chinda, Yet the story behind the scenery and the memorial wife of the Japanese Ambassador. From her first is filled with turmoil and controversy. Loud pro- visit to Japan in 1885, noted authority on Asian tests against the building of the memorial and the culture and newspaper correspondent Eliza R. removal of the cherished trees resulted in a great Scidmore advocated the planting of such trees battle by several Washingtonians. in the nation’s capital. The years turned into In 1912, First Lady Helen Taft and the Vis- decades in her quest to beautify the city. Despite countess Chinda, wife of the Japanese Ambassa- her lack of success, this was a formative time for dor, planted the first two Yoshino cherry trees on Washington, D.C., as a series of damaging floods the north end of the Tidal Basin. Originally there underscored the need for dredging the Potomac city we know today. The city, taking its cue from were 3,020 cherry trees of 12 different varieties.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Brochure
    Enjoy live narration of the underlying history and significance of the top Zohery Tours offers diversified monuments and main attractions. We offer transportation services to suit individual virtual tours of Washington DC (including and corporate needs. If you’re looking the Grand Tour and African American for transportation services in the DC Heritage), Alexandria and Mt. Vernon, and Metro Area, Zohery Tours is your #1 Treasures of Egypt - all at the comfort of choice! your home! Zohery Tours has been helping teachers take their students on personalized educational Tour Departures fieldtrips across the area for over 30 years. Traveling with us will ensure that you travel All tours depart from in safe and comfortable buses, all while having tons of fun. Student safety is our 400 New Jersey Ave NW number one priority. This is why Zohery Tours is a trusted name in student travel. Washington DC 20001 (2 ½ blocks away from the Union Station Metro) CELEBRATING OVER 30 YEARS OF EXCELLENCE IN SIGHTSEEING Lectured Tours and Transportation 202-554-4200 WWW.ZOHERY.COM Email: [email protected] Itinerary of the Daily Tours (excluding the Mount Vernon Tour) DAILY TOURS Grand Tour of Alexandria & Washington Mount Vernon $79 per person $59 per person (Entrance fee included) Departs at 10:30 AM Departs at 2:00 PM Approx. 3-4 hours Approx. 4-5 hours Washington Full Day Tour After Dark $59 per person $138 per person (Entrance fee included) Departs at 7:30 PM Departs at 10:30 AM Approx. 3-4 hours Approx. 8-9 hours Child: $39 (age 3-11) The Full Day Tour is a combination of the Grand Tour and the PRIVATE TOURS Alexandria & Mount Vernon Tour.
    [Show full text]
  • December 1999 of Trappe, Collegeville, Perkiomen Valley, Inc
    The Chronicle A Publication of The Historical Society December 1999 of Trappe, Collegeville, Perkiomen Valley, Inc. Volume XXVIII, No. 5 Wa shington AnniversaryEx hibit The President's Message The 200th Anniversary of the death of President George Washington in Decem­ In teresting happenings are in progress at the Dewees Tavern ber 1799 will be observed at the Dewees and the Muhlenberg House. We have had a number of tour Museum, 301 W. Main Street, Trappe, groups visit us and a number are scheduled. We welcome them. beginningon Sunday, December 5th. The Our maintenance costs continue so we must ask our visitors exhibit will include prints of personages from the American Revolution who were and supporters fo r contributionsfrom time to time. involved with Washington and the We are gratefulfo r the Century Club support over the past Muhlenbergs. A unique reverse painting nine years, but some have neglected to keep up with their of Wakefield, the birthplace of Washing­ commitment. We plan to send letters of reminder. ton, on loan from the Rev. Robert Home, We would like to purchase two five-plated stoves fo r.the first will be shown. Anantique print ofWash­ floor cooking fireplaces. The cost is $7, 000 apiece. Ifanyo ne ington in his Masonic regalia will be a cares to donate one, or both, or a fraction of one, give me a call part of the exhibit. Muhlenberg House will not be open on December 5th. and we 'I/ negotiate. Furnishing the Muhlenberg House is One of the bicentennial (1932) framed important, but there is no rush to get it done.
    [Show full text]
  • Virtual and Physical Environments in the Work of Pipilotti Rist, Doug Aitken, and Olafur Eliasson
    Virtual and Physical Environments in the work of Pipilotti Rist, Doug Aitken, and Olafur Eliasson A thesis submitted to the Division of Research and Advanced Studies of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF ART in the Art History Program of the College of Design, Architecture, Art, and Planning April 2012 by Ashton Tucker B.A., Bowling Green State University College of Arts and Sciences Committee Chair: Morgan Thomas, Ph.D. Reader: Kimberly Paice, Ph.D. Reader: Jessica Flores, M.A. ABSTRACT The common concerns of artists Pipilotti Rist (b. 1962), Doug Aitken (b. 1968), and Olafur Eliasson (b. 1967) are symptomatic of key questions in contemporary art and culture. In this study, I examine key works by each artist, emphasizing their common interest in the interplay of virtual space and physical space and, more generally, their use of screen aesthetics. Their focus on the creative interplay of virtuality and physicality is indicative of their understanding of the fragility and uncertainty of physical perception in a world dominated by screen-based communication. In chapter one, I explore Pipilotti Rist’s Pour Your Body Out (7354 Cubic Meters) and argue that the artist creates work where screen based projection and installation are interrelated elements due to her interest in creating spaces that engage the viewer both physically and virtually. In chapter two, I discuss Doug Aitken’s work and argue that he democratizes the viewing experience in a more radical way than Pipilotti Rist. In the final chapter, I discuss the work of Olafur Eliasson as it relates to California Light and Space art and the phenomenological aspects of the eighteenth-century phantasmagoria.
    [Show full text]
  • Peace Trail on the National Mall
    PEACE TRAIL ON THE NATIONAL MALL Making Peace Possible Learn more about the United States Institute of Peace at www.usip.org PEACE TRAIL ON THE NATIONAL MALL Introduction The northwest corner of the National Mall could be considered the “War and Peace Corner” of our nation’s capital. It is home to this country’s most famous veterans memorials, which draw tens of millions of visitors each year. It is also home to the headquarters of the United States Institute of Peace (USIP), and to other symbols and sites with peace themes, which, while generally less prominent, offer an important and complementary narrative. The following Peace Trail on the National Mall is the result of a collaboration between USIP and colleagues at the Guild of Professional Tour Guides of Washington, D.C. and at the National Park Service. Anchored at USIP and tracing a path to a dozen other key sites in the vicinity, it brings a “peace lens” to the experience of visiting the National Mall. It may be used as a self-guided walking tour or a reference guide, elevating stories of key figures, institutions, and moments in history that demonstrate America’s enduring commitment to peace. 1 M HA EDWARD R MURROW H ST NW 66 Decatur House Von Steuben PARK LAFAYETTE Kosciuszko NEW US Court of George New Executive PARK Appeals and Washington H ST NW Office Bldg Baruch Bench Jackson US Court University of Claims Renwick Gallery 24TH ST NW Rochambeau Treasury Annex Lafayette Juarez Blair-Lee House Closed roads G ST NW Eisenhower 14TH ST NW Executive Department Office of the F ST NW
    [Show full text]
  • Peace in Palestine Via the World Heritage Convention
    . Michael K. Madison II. Peace in Palestine ..........through World Heritage Promoting Peace via Global Conventions - 1 - Peace in Palestine via the World Heritage Convention Promoting Peace via Global Conventions The Global Problem "Throughout history, religious differences have divided men and women from their neighbors and have served as justification for some of humankind's bloodiest conflicts. In the modern world, it has become clear that people of all religions must bridge these differences and work together, to ensure our survival and realize the vision of peace that all faiths share." -- H.R.H. Prince El-Hassan bin Talal, Jordan Moderator, WCRP Governing Board Tolerance, Economic Growth and Fear Global peace and harmony is not possible without religious tolerance. Unfortunately, there is no instant microwavable solution. We can’t just add water and/or milk to the current situation and hope that the world will ameliorate itself overnight. No. The world needs help. The problem is not the outliers; it is larger groups of people that need to change. Outliers will always be present. The world needs religious-minded policymakers to take giant steps that lead to peace, but in a mutually beneficial way. Indeed, peace for peace’s sake is not always enough incentive to all parties involved. Therefore, if the conflict cannot be resolved by tolerance, then let it be resolved by greed as we find a way to help the countries involved to achieve a better economic position. If the conflict cannot be resolved by boosting the corresponding economies, then let it be resolved by fear as we convince the nations involved that one false move means it will be - 2 - their country against the rest of the world and not just their “enemy of the day”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cultural Heritage Element a Strategy for Preserving Our Sense of Place April 2006
    Heritage The Cultural Heritage Element A Strategy for Preserving Our Sense of Place April 2006 envision The Comprehensive Plan for Lancaster County, Pennsylvania Lancaster County Table of Contents Introduction Key Message . 3 Our Challenge . 3 Purpose of This Plan . 4 Heritage: An Element of the Lancaster County Comprehensive Plan . 5 Need for the Plan . 7 Approach . 7 Contents of This Plan . 7 Goals, Objectives, and Strategies . 8 Existing Conditions Historical and Cultural Overview of Lancaster County . 13 Native American / American Indian Settlement . 13 Penn’s Woods and the Establishment of Lancaster County . 16 Settlement Patterns . 18 Religious Traditions in 18th-Century Lancaster County . 19 18th-Century Built Environment . 27 Agriculture in the 18th Century . 27 18th-Century Industries . 27 Revolutionary War and Early Republic . 28 Development of Free African Communities . 29Growing Transportation Network 30 of Contents Table Arts and Education in the 18th and 19th Centuries . 33 Slavery, the Civil War, and the Underground Railroad . 34 Agriculture in the 19th and 20th Centuries . 38 Manufacturing in the Late 19th and Early 20th Centuries . 39 Arts in the 20th Century . 41 20th Century to Today . 41 Preservation Planning In Lancaster County . 43 Past Efforts . 43 Present Efforts . 50 Preservation Trends . 53 Introduction . 53 Positive Trends . 56 Mixed Results . 61 Negative Trends . 66 Planning Process Guiding Principles . 73 Stakeholder Involvement . 73 Sustainability . 73 Integration of Supporting Studies . 73 Achievable Recommendations . 74 Research and Assessment . 74 Public Involvement Strategy . 75 Lancaster County Cultural Heritage Plan Task Force . 75 Regional Meetings . 76 Public Workshop: There’s No Place Like Home . 76 Public Involvement Findings .
    [Show full text]
  • World Heritage Papers 7 ; Cultural Landscapes: the Challenges Of
    Ferrara 7-couv 12/01/04 17:38 Page 1 7 World Heritage papers7 World Heritage papers Cultural Landscapes: Cultural Landscapes: the Challenges of Conservation of Challenges the Landscapes: Cultural the Challenges of Conservation World Heritage 2002 Shared Legacy, Common Responsibility Associated Workshops 11-12 November 2002 Ferrara - Italy For more information contact: paper; printed on chlorine free Cover paper interior printed on recycled RectoVerso Design by UNESCO World Heritage Centre papers 7, place de Fontenoy 75352 Paris 07 SP France Tel : 33 (0)1 45 68 15 71 Fax : 33 (0)1 45 68 55 70 E-mail : [email protected] orld Heritage W http://whc.unesco.org/venice2002 photo:Cover Delta © Studio B&G Po Ferrara 7 12/01/04 17:34 Page 1 Cultural Landscapes: the Challenges of Conservation World Heritage 2002 Shared Legacy, Common Responsibility Associated Workshops 11-12 November 2002 Ferrara - Italy Hosted by the Province of Ferrara and the City of Ferrara Organized by the University of Ferrara and UNESCO’s World Heritage Centre in collaboration with ICCROM, ICOMOS and IUCN With the support of the Nordic World Heritage Foundation (NWHF) and the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Sciences (OCenW) Ferrara 7 12/01/04 17:34 Page 2 Disclaimer The authors are responsible for the choice and presentation of the facts contained in this publication and for the opinions therein, which are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization. The designation employed and the presentation of the material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Heritage Preservation: the Past, the Present and the Future
    CULTURAL HERITAGE PRESERVATION: THE PAST, THE PRESENT AND THE FUTURE AND THE PRESENT THE PAST, PRESERVATION: HERITAGE CULTURAL Cultural Heritage Preservation: The Past, the Present and the Future “Heritage comes in many shapes—in tangible forms such as sites, build- ings, landscapes, or as intangibles, like memories, emotions, values and customs—as does the use of heritage, ranging from the purpose of build- ing nations to marketing places. Heritage usually represents a phenomenon within a traditional historical discourse but have lately, more and more, Cultural Heritage Preservation: come to take in peripheral appearances; often emanating from groups at the fringes of that traditional discourse as well. The use of heritage occurs The Past, the Present and the Future in different arenas and takes on significance as a vehicle for political, cultural and entrepreneurial purposes, as well as educational and emancipatory, to name just a few. How to interpret heritage in order to understand its meaning to different groups is therefore a very important task.” This anthology describes heritage preservation, development and manage- Tomas Nilson & Kristina Thorell (eds.) ment from different theoretical views and disciplines. It integrates per- spectives from history, human geography, archaeology, social anthropology THORELL (EDS.) NILSON & KRISTINA TOMAS and heritage conservation. The texts revolve around different dimension of culture and heritage via examples from varying contexts and locations. Forskning i Halmstad nr 24 Halmstad University ISBN 978-91-87045-94-3 (printed) ISBN 978-91-87045-95-0 (pdf) Halmstad University Press Mailing address: P.O. Box 823 SE-301 18 Halmstad Halmstad 2018 Telephone: +46 35-16 71 00 E-mail: [email protected] www.hh.se Forskning i Halmstad nr 24 CULTURAL HERITAGE PRESERVATION: THE PAST, THE PRESENT AND THE FUTURE FORSKNING I HALMSTAD NR.
    [Show full text]
  • Genocide-Holodomor 1932–1933: the Losses of the Ukrainian Nation”
    TARAS SHEVCHENKO NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF KYIV NATIONAL MUSEUM “HOLODOMOR VICTIMS MEMORIAL” UKRAINIAN GENOCIDE FAMINE FOUNDATION – USA, INC. MAKSYM RYLSKY INSTITUTE OF ART, FOLKLORE STUDIES, AND ETHNOLOGY MYKHAILO HRUSHEVSKY INSTITUTE OF UKRAINIAN ARCHAEOGRAPHY AND SOURCE STUDIES PUBLIC COMMITTEE FOR THE COMMEMORATION OF THE VICTIMS OF HOLODOMOR-GENOCIDE 1932–1933 IN UKRAINE ASSOCIATION OF FAMINE RESEARCHERS IN UKRAINE VASYL STUS ALL-UKRAINIAN SOCIETY “MEMORIAL” PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC- EDUCATIONAL WORKING CONFERENCE “GENOCIDE-HOLODOMOR 1932–1933: THE LOSSES OF THE UKRAINIAN NATION” (October 4, 2016, Kyiv) Kyiv 2018 УДК 94:323.25 (477) “1932/1933” (063) Proceedings of the International Scientific-Educational Working Conference “Genocide-Holodomor 1932–1933: The Losses of the Ukrainian Nation” (October 4, 2016, Kyiv). – Kyiv – Drohobych: National Museum “Holodomor Victims Memorial”, 2018. x + 119. This collection of articles of the International Scientific-Educational Working Conference “Genocide-Holodomor 1932–1933: The Losses of the Ukrainian Nation” reveals the preconditions and causes of the Genocide- Holodomor of 1932–1933, and the mechanism of its creation and its consequences leading to significant cultural, social, moral, and psychological losses. The key issue of this collection of articles is the problem of the Ukrainian national demographic losses. This publication is intended for historians, researchers, ethnologists, teachers, and all those interested in the catastrophe of the Genocide-Holodomor of 1932–1933. Approved for publication by the Scientific and Methodological Council of the National Museum “Holodomor Victims Memorial” (Protocol No. 9 of 25 September 2018). Editorial Board: Cand. Sc. (Hist.) Olesia Stasiuk, Dr. Sc. (Hist.) Vasyl Marochko, Dr. Sc. (Hist.), Prof. Volodymyr Serhijchuk, Dr. Sc.
    [Show full text]
  • Foundation Document Overview, the White House
    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Foundation Document Overview The White House and President’s Park Washington, D.C. Contact Information For more information about The White House and President’s Park Foundation Document, contact: [email protected] or (202)208-1631 or write to: President’s Park, 1100 Ohio Drive, SW, Washington, D.C. 20242 Purpose The purpose of the PRESIDENT’S PARK is to: • Preserve the cultural resources of the White House—its architecture, artifacts, landscape design, gardens and grounds, and the surrounding parklands—in ways that foster and preserve dignity and respect for the office of the presidency, while still allowing for their use. • Provide a dignified transition area from an urban environment to the White House environs. • Interpret the history and significance of the presidency, the White House, and President’s Park, including their relationship to the American public, our republican form of government, and the growth of Washington, D.C. • Preserve existing historic memorials as examples of memorial art. • Provide a large open area associated with the White House for freedom of public expression and assembly activities, as well as for public use and enjoyment. The purpose statements are reprinted from the Comprehensive Design Plan for the White House and • Protect and enhance views to and from the President’s Park (2000). White House and provide a setting for viewing the White House. • Preserve Lafayette Park as open public space in The purpose of THE WHITE HOUSE is to: the foreground of the White House, as a setting for passive activities (reflecting, observing, • Provide a residence that offers privacy, making a personal connection with the protection, and recreational opportunities for presidency), First Amendment activities within the first family.
    [Show full text]
  • From Cultural Heritage to the Confederacy Maliha Ikram
    Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy Volume 14 | Issue 1 Article 2 Fall 2018 Long-Term Preservation of Public Art: From Cultural Heritage to the Confederacy Maliha Ikram Recommended Citation Maliha Ikram, Long-Term Preservation of Public Art: From Cultural Heritage to the Confederacy, 14 Nw. J. L. & Soc. Pol'y. 37 (2018). https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njlsp/vol14/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern Pritzker School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy by an authorized editor of Northwestern Pritzker School of Law Scholarly Commons. Copyright 2018 by Northwestern University School of Law Volume 14 (Fall 2018) Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy Long-Term Preservation of Public Art: From Cultural Heritage to the Confederacy Maliha Ikram* ABSTRACT Fifty years ago, in the city of Idyllic Isle, America,1 an artist created a sculpture for the city. The artist’s focus was on remedying the sordid history of Idyllic Isle, a city that was not always so peaceful. Long ago, the city was overrun with racism, hateful propaganda advancing minority oppression, government corruption, and disregard for its coastal environment. Over the years, the city improved, but still had not reached its potential. The artist decided that he wanted to erect a sculpture on the publicly-owned land overlooking the city’s coastal waters. The government agreed that he could place the statue on the land as he wished, since there were no other plans for the land and the government wanted to rehabilitate it into a park space for its citizens.
    [Show full text]