File: 18G 60 y~po D.B.
ELELSON AIR FORCE BASE OPERABLE UINIT-2 SOURCE AREAS ST13/DP26 TREATABILITY STUDY INFORMAL TECHNqICAL INFORMATION REPORT
VOLUME III: DATA EVALUATION AND VALIDATION REPORTS (FIELD ACTIVITIES ADDENDUM, APPENDIX E)
FINAL
MIR FORCE CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL EXCELLENCE
BROOKS MIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS
FEBRUARY 16, 1996 MIR FORCE CENTER for ENVIRONMENTAL EXCELLENCE
Source Areas ST13/DP26 Treatability Study Informal Technical Information Report
Volume III: Data Evaluation and Validation Reports (Field Activities Addendum, Appendix B)
Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska
*0
February 16, 1996
FINAL Appendix E Data Evaluation and Validatdon Reports
R112-96/ES/8840002.77AA Appendix E Data Quality Evaluation Elelson Afr Force Base Source Areas ST13/DP26
This appendix to the Field Activites Addendum presents the results of the Quality Assurance/ Quality Control (QA/QC) protocols implemented during the groundwater sampling and analysis portion of the site investigation. The quality indicators from every aspect of the data collections have been reviewed, and an assessment of the data with regard to the project specific objectives is presented. The reliability of the sampling and analytical procedures used during the investigation was demonstrated by implementing the project specific quality assurance procedures specified in the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPjP). Successful execution of these procedures provides strong supporting evidence for the acceptance of the data as being representative of the areas under investigation. A complete evaluation of the procedures implemented during the investigation are summarized in this Data Quality Evaluation (DQE).
The DQE for the Source Areas ST13/DP26 Investigation was divided into two phases. The first phase includes the discussion of the overall field sampling effort and the field quality control (QC) activities employed. The resulting QC data were presented and compared to the procedures and goals established in the QAPJP, as well as the verification of the completeness, accuracy and representativeness of the field sampling. The second phase deals with the analytical program and the results of the QC activities as stipulated in the QAPjP. An overall comparison to data quality objectives (DQOs) was performed as well as a complete data review. A Level IV validation was performed on 100% of the data. The validation was performed using the "USEPA Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review" (February 1994) and "USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review"~ (February 1993) for guidance. The results of the validation are included in the DQE. All elements of data evaluation were then compiled and used to determine the usability and overall applicability of the resulting data.
I. Field Sampling Program
Field Quality Control Activities - To ensure the reliability of the field sampling procedures, materials and analytical data, field QA/QC samples were collected or prepared for each medium sampled, each sample shipment and/or each sampling event. The results of the
Rin-m~~s/s84M.TMA~E-2 QAIQC! samples are then used to address any sample variability and uncertainty in procedures.
Field Duplicates - As required by the QAPjP, one field duplicate was collected and submitted to the laboratory for analysis. The purpose of the field duplicate is to generate data used to evaluate the precision of the sample collection and analysis process. Laboratory duplicates are discussed under Laboratory Quality Control Activities. Typically, water samples are found to be more comparable than other matrices. Water samples, however, may show significant differences when there is stratification or layering. Higher RPI~s are thought to reflect difficulties often encountered during the collection of duplicate samples or sample handling. Wide variations in results may be attributable to actual variations in concentrations rather than denoting problems with precision or sampling effectiveness. Also, when "estimated" concentrations are reported, there is potential for increased variability between the primary and duplicate sample results. They are useful, however, in evaluating variations in field conditions.
A field duplicate @H2008) was submitted with the original sample @H2001) collected from area DP26 location 26-1. All parameters and results for the original sample and its duplicate are presented in Table F-1. Data for the samples compared well as demonstrated in the Relative Percent Difference (RPD) calculations. The RPD results were calculated as follows:
A-B RPD = ------100 [(A+B)/2] where:
RPD = Relative percent difference A = Original sample result B = Duplicate sample result.
Please note that when no concentrations are detected in the sample an "NC' is used to represent that the RPD was "not calculable" for that parameter. There was no quantifiable result available for the RPD calculation for "non-detect" data. Field duplicate results agreed with the original sample results within 20 percent with the exception of the Gasoline Range Organics (GRO) analysis which required dilution. The results from the initial runs for both the original and duplicate sample agreed well, but the dilution runs showed greater variation at 58 percent. This outlier noted in the GRO analysis was not deemed crucial to the quality
Mn-%IES/8$40M.TMA ~E-3 of the data due to the potential nonhomogeneity of the sample (i.e. the potential presence of free product) and the fact that the analysis is to be used as an indicator parameter only. All other reported concentrations compared well, demonstrating good precision in the sample collection process.
Tri Blanks - Volatile organic samples are susceptible to contamination by diffusion of organic compounds into the sample container. Trip blanks were analyzed in order to monitor possible sample contamination during shipment and storage. The blanks were submitted with each batch of sample containers requiring volatile organic compounds (VOC) analysis. The trip blanks originated in the laboratory, accompanied the samples through collection and shipment back to the laboratory and were then stored with the samples.
All samples submitted for volatile organics analysis were shipped to the laboratory accompanied by a trip blank sample. The reported trip blanks and sample results do not indicate the presence of contaminants introduced during the sample shipping and storage process. Results of the trip blank analyses are reported and will be archived with the corresponding sample analytical data.
If. Analytical Program The analytical program determined, with documented precision and accuracy, if specific compounds and analytes were present in the groundwater samples collected from the STIN3DP26 areas under investigation. Chemical analyses for the investigation were performed in accordance with the guidelines prescribed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste (SW-846), Physical/Chemical Methods, Third Edition, September 1986 and subsequent revisions; Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes (MCAWW), EPA-600/4-79-020, Revised March 1983; Leaking Underground Fuel Tank (LUFT) Field Manual, Guidelines for Site Assessment Cleanup and Underground Storage Tank (UST) Closure, October 1989 and Alaska State methods for the analysis of Gasoline Range Organics (GRO and Diesel Range Organics (DRO). The groundwater and associated QC samples were analyzed for polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PA~s); benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and the xylene isomers (BTEX); total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) as DRO and GRO; total and dissolved organic and inorganic lead; cations, anions, alkalinity, hardness, and total dissolved solids (TDS). Table F-2 lists the analytical parameters and specified methods for which samples were tested.
RLP2-96F/Ess8MI2 TMA E-4 The submitted data packages were reviewed for completeness and compliance to the approved final work plan (IT, 1995) and 10096 of the data have been validated using EPA Level IV functional guidelines. All samples were submitted to the laboratory accompanied by a request for analysis (RFA) form. The RFAs provided project specific analytical specifications and quality control instruction to the laboratories. A formal chain-of-custody (COC) traceability record was included in conjunction with the RFA for documentation of custody for sample transportation, storage and eventual disposition by the laboratory. All custody documentation was included in the data packages submitted.
QA/QC Procedures - The project QAIQC program described in the QAPjP was followed for the sample collection and laboratory analysis of samples. The elements of this program are discussed in the sections that follow. The laboratory analytical program consisted of EPA SW-846, MCAWW, CAL LUFT and Alaska State methods with level IV deliverables. Deliverables include sample preparation information, calibration records, QC data such as method blanks, spikes, duplicates, surrogate recoveries, all associated raw data and copies of the RFA/COC records. Chemical analyses for this project were performed following standardized protocols, which include specific requirements for how compounds are analyzed, identified and reported.
Each of the methods employed included specific QAIQC protocols that are used to support the validity of the sampling event and the resulting data. These QAIQC protocols are a critical part of the analytical method and were followed explicitly during sample analysis. Specific measures included detailed record keeping procedures, analysis of duplicate samples, instrument calibrations, and the analyses of blanks and surrogate standards.
Holding Times - All laboratory results submitted for the ST13/DP26 area investigation were reviewed with respect to laboratory adherence to extraction and analysis holding times. Maximum analytical extraction and analysis holding times, as presented in Table B-l of the QAPjP, were met by the laboratory with the exception of the TPH as gasoline analysis performed on sample H2006, collected from area DP26 location 26-7. The sample was collected on July 9, 1995. The analysis was performed on July 26,1995, exceeding the analytical holding time by three days. The resulting data was qualified during the validation process as estimated but was not rejected because the holding time was narrowly missed and all remaining QC was within established control limits. No TPII-GRO was detected in the sample. No other variances were noted.
Mn-96I89M .TooMA E-5 Method Blanks - Method blanks were analyzed with each analytical "batch" processed. The blanks were carried through the analytical procedure, step-by-step, including the addition of all solvents and other reagents required in the analytical process. The purpose of the blank is to ensure that no contaminants are being introduced to the sample as a result of any part of the analytical process, helping to eliminate the element of doubt as to the origin of reported concentrations.
The method blank results reported with the STl3/DP26 data were evaluated for high readings characteristic of background or process contamination. There were no concentrations detected in the designated blank samples that deem any analytical process out of control or require further corrective action.
It should be noted that the data set presented in this report is not blank corrected. The data validation process did include a blank correction step (5X/lOX Rule) as required by the functional guidelines for data validation. The corrected data is presented in the data validation summary report included in this Appendix.
Laboratory Control Samples - Laboratory control samples (LCSs) were used in the analytical program as a measure of accuracy without the influence of matrix on the analysis. The laboratory control sample is best described as a spiked laboratory blank measured and reported by calculating the percent recovery of the known spiked concentrations. An LCS was analyzed with every batch of samples processed and analyzed. The control limits applied were statistically derived by the laboratory as required by the method. The review of all LCS data associated with the ST13/DP26 data set revealed all data to be within the specified control limits demonstrating good accuracy for all analytical processes employed.
Matrix Spikes/Matrix Spike Duplicates - Matrix spikes are used to provide an indication of bias due to matrix effects and a measure of accuracy of associated results. Duplicate analyses, sometimes performed using a matrix spike duplicate in the case of organics analyses, provide a measure of precision in the analytical process. Matrix spike/duplicates or matrix spike/matrix spike duplicates (MS/MSD) were analyzed for every 20 groundwater samples collected and analyzed for the investigation. One MS/MSD analysis was required for this data set. The observed percent recovery of the spike was used to determine accuracy for the analyses. Control limits used to evaluate these recoveries were determined statistically by the laboratory for organics as required by the methods employed and a range of 75-125 percent was used for inorganics as a standard acceptance range. Relative percent
Rlfl-96/E818840002 TM E-6 difference (RPD) calculations are used to evaluate duplicate sample results as they are for field duplicate samples. The acceptance criteria for the precision data were statistically determined by the laboratory for organics. A limit of + or - 20 percent was used for the evaluation of the inorganics precision data. Precision data were calculated using the MS/MSD analysis for organics and the analysis of laboratory-initiated sample duplicates for inorganics.
Several elements exhibited variation in the matrix spike recovery data as compared to the applied control limits. All laboratory control sample data showed good recoveries for these elements indicating the problem to be within the recovery from the matrix analyzed. Data was not qualified as a result of these variations since validation judgements are not made based on MS/MSD results alone. All other associated QC data were within control limits indicating no need for further qualification. No real data impact is expected from these variations.
Surrogate Standuard - Surrogate standards were used in the analytical program to monitor the percent recovery efficiencies of the sample preparation and analytical procedure on a sample-by-sample basis for organic constituents. The surrogate standards used were those required by the analytical methodology employed and were compliant with the requirements of the QAPJP. Control limits for surrogate recoveries were determined statistically by the laboratory as required by the methodology. Evaluation of the surrogate standard data exhibited acceptable results for all applicable analyses. Recoveries were outside limits for many of the dilution runs. This variance would be expected since the dilution necessary to report all resulting concentrations within the instrument's calibration range essentially "dilutes out" the concentrations of the surrogate spikes added or introduces enough "mathematical error" to skew recovery calculations. The original, undiluted analysis exhibited all surrogate standard recoveries to be within acceptable limits. Variations were also noted in some confirmation analyses for BTEX. Associated sample results were unaffected by the anomaly since results were not quantified from the confirmation runs. These analyses were used for qualitative confirmation only. No re-extractions or reanalyses due to unacceptable surrogate recoveries were required.
Data Quality Objectives - DQOs are qualitative and quantitative criteria used to guide sample collection and analysis activities. The DQOs for the project were developed at the outset of the investigation to ensure that the data generated during the execution of the analytical program were of appropriate quality to support the anticipated end use of the data.
REn-96IES/sg400xn.TMA E-7 DQOs describe the level of uncertainty that a decision-maker is willing to accept in results derived from the environmental data. This uncertainty is used to establish the quality of the measurement data, usually in terms of objectives, bias, representativeness, comparability and completeness. DQOs seek to ensure that the right type, amount and quality of data are collected to accomplish the objectives of the project.
The DQOs for this project are to produce scientifically valid data of known accuracy and precision, which are complete with respect to identified critical samples, comparable with similar data types and representative of the media sampled so as to be useful for the cited purposes.
In order to achieve these DQOs, criteria were established in the QAPjP by which these goals could be achieved. The investigation required that all laboratory analyses be performed and resulting data reported in CLP-like format (Level IV). The EPA Level IV criteria were chosen because compliance with the criteria specified within its guidelines provides quantified concentrations with acceptable reliability for the purposes of the investigation. All reported analytical data met or exceeded the requirements of Level IV QC as stipulated and fully described in the QAPjP.
Data Useability - The data review process presented in this report compares sample results to pre-established criteria to confirm that the data are of acceptable technical quality. Specific criteria were reviewed which verifies the achievement of all precision, accuracy, completeness, comparability and representativeness goals established to meet the project DQOs. To verify that these goals were met, field measurements, sampling and handling procedures, laboratory analysis and reporting, and all nonconformances and discrepancies in the data were examined to determine compliance with the specified procedures. The results of this review were presented in previous sections with all outliers or nonconformances discussed where they occurred.
Precision data were obtained through the analysis and evaluation of duplicate QA samples. Accuracy was determined through the analysis and evaluation of method blanks, laboratory control samples, trip blanks and matrix spike samples. These QC samples were collected and analyzed within their designated holding times at the frequency established in the QAPjP, verifying the completeness element of the goals.
Completeness is a measure of the amount of valid data that are obtained duning a sampling
Rwn-96/Es1s4ooo.TMA E-8 event. Some data were qualified as estimated in the validation process because the designated limits noted in the various calibration, holding time, surrogate recovery and ICP serial dilution results for BTEX, DRO, GRO and certain elements were exceeded. There were no data points qualified as rejected in the validation process.
Comparability is a qualitative parameter expressing the confidence with which one data set can be compared with another. Comparability ensures that results for the sampling event can be compared with data from other past and/or future sampling programs. Comparability for this sampling event was achieved through the use of established and recognized techniques and accepted standard EPA methods. All samples collected and analyzed were subjected to the same sampling, handling, preparation, analysis, reporting and validation criteria for the purpose of achieving comparability goals within the data set. To verify sample representativeness, field data such as field activity daily logs (FADL), sample collection logs, COC/RFA forms, field instrument calibrations and variances were reviewed. The overall results of the analyses as discussed in this evaluation suggest that representative samples were collected and analyzed with results being indicative of the media analyzed, with the exception of the few anomalies noted. Overall, the inv estigation data appear to be representative of expected site conditions and are consistent with results expected based on historical activities at the site.
Data Validation - The Level IV validation of the final data packages for the ST1 3/DP26 investigation was performed using the "USEPA Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review" (February 1994) and the "USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review" (February 1993). For those analytical methods not addressed by the functional guidelines, similar procedures were used; data'were also reviewed against the specific SW- 846, MCAWW and CAL LUFT method requirements. Criteria were applied to 100% of the total samples collected and analyzed. Individual validation reports were prepared for each parameter as presented in each sample delivery group; the overall results and key findings are summarized in the report presented at the end of this discussion.
The final step of the validation process involves the assignment of qualifier flags to each analyte designating the confidence level assigned to the data point as a result of the defined data review. 100% of the measured contaminant concentration data obtained in the sampling program were validated and subjected to peer review. Data flagged with the "J" qualifier
R~n-96/Es/8&4M.TMAL E-9 indicates the values are estimated because of variations noted in the associated analytical QC results.
All analytical results for chemicals are reported using laboratory data qualifiers. Chemicals flagged with a "U" qualifier are considered to be not detected, or detected at a concentration below the normal, random "noise" of the analytical instrument. The "I" qualifier describes an estimated value when a compound is qualitatively identified, but at values less than the project-required reporting limit.
Summary - The intended uses of the acquired data were to assess the nature of the site and the degree and extent of chemical contamination resulting ftom past activities and to evaluate potential hazards to human health and the environment. These objectives were efficiently met by characterizing the site in lateral and vertical extent of groundwater contamination at the site, as well as the rate and direction of contaminant migration. Also, further information was obtained as to the site groundwater hydrology. The data reported and evaluated for this report meets the objectives set forth to supplement and satisfy these endeavors. No significant problems were observed that would adversely affect the application of these data for their intended use. The data quality objectives of the investigation were met.
R1J-W6ES/8840002TMA E- 10 I-lINTERNATIONAL Mm r n u iLL.CORPORATION M m rn u
To: Teresa Kovalcson Date: September 27, 1995
From: Vickie Etheridgel%1.4,45
Subject: Eielson AFB - DATA VALIDATION SUMMARY
validation of the Level IV raw data packages for the Ejelson AFB samples has been completed. The validation process references "1USEPA Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) National Functional Guidelines For Inorganic Data Review" (February 1994) and "USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National Functional Guidelines For Organic Data Review (February 1993). For those analytical methods not addressed by the CLP guidelines, similar procedures were used; data were also reviewed against the specific SW4-846 method requirements. Individual validation reports have been prepared for each parameter in each data package; the overall results of the entire validation effort are summarized in this report. The following paragraphs highlight the key findings of this validation effort: I. Volatile Organic Analysis by GO/MS
Qualifiers were applied to the data for the following reasons:
1. Holding Time Violation - Results for sample D4008 are qualified estimated (J,UJ) due to holding time being exceeded.
II. Volatile Organic Analysis by GO
Data have been qualified due to the following reasons: -
1. Holdinq Time Violation -ae'L~ quali ~(JUJ de to holding time being
-- eeded.
2. Initial Calibration - The analytical method requires a three point curve for initial calibration. It is not evident that a curve was run for samples in this data package; therefore, results are qualified estimated (J,UJ).
3. High Response Factor Variability - Continuing calibration checks indicate that a few compounds exceeded the %D criteria (%25) ; therefore, associated
t. 85 sample results are qualified as estimated (U,UJ). -
4. Compound identification and Ouantitation - Results for ethylbenzene, m&p-xylene, and o-xylene were reported as nondetects. Chromatograms show peaks at the compound retention time and concentrations above the PQL. The Form I has been corrected. III. Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAils)
Qualifiers have been assigned to the data for the following reasons:
1. High Percent Relative Standard Deviation - Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene and indeno(l,2,3,-cd)pyrene showed high %RSD in initial calibration in SDG 1K9504406. Associated sample results were qualified as estimated (J,UJ).
2. High Response Factor Variability - Continuing calibration checks indicate that some compounds exceed the percent difference criteria (%D) . Associated samples results are qualified estimated (J,UJ).
IV. Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (Diesel,DRO and Gasoline Range Organics ,GR0)
No qualifiers were assigned to the DRO data. Sample results are acceptable as reported by the laboratory.
CR0 data have been qualified due to the following reasons:
1. Holding Time Violation - The holding time was missed for sample H2006, thus results are qualified estimated (UJ).
2. Surrogate Recovery - Results for the diluted sample H2014 are qualified estimated (J) due to high surrogate recovery.
V. organic Lead ih Qld!P4flt4The' ~ data are acceptable as reported by the laboratory. -Gfier
VI. Inorganics Qualifiers were assigned to the data for the following reasons:
1. Matrix Spike Percent Recovery - Lead had a %recovery which was outside the acceptable QC limits, indicating either a procedural problem or matrix effect. Results for samples P4003,.P4015, and P4018 were qualified as estimated (J,UJ).
2. TCP Serial Dilution -The ICP serial dilution shows sodium as being outside the acceptable QC criteria for sample 112009; results have been qualified estimated (J).
3. Method of Standard Addition (MSA) - Lead results for samples 112008 and 112009 are qualified estimated due to problems associate with the MSA analysis. It appears as though no calibration was performed prior to MSA analysis for sample 112008. There was a low correlation coefficient for sample 112009.
VII. Ion Chromatography
No validation qualifiers have been assigned to the ion chromatography data. Data are acceptable as reported by the laboratory.
VIII. Wet Chemistry
Qualifiers have been assigned to the data for the following reasons:
1. Preservation - Sulfide results for samples 112004 and H12005 have been qualified due to improper preservation. 2 ~~~Water samples should be preserved with zinc acetate.
2. Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) -The LCS for TOC analysis was high in SDG K(9504465 and 1K9504406; associated sample results are qualified estimated (J).
3. Matrix Spike - Due to low matrix spike recovery for sulfate, results for sample H12009 are qualified estimated (J).
Full details of the validation may be found in the attached reports. Please let me.know if you have any questions regarding this validation effort.
Attachments 31INTERNATIONAL
By . .Date . .Subject Sheet No.-. of
tkd. By-Date Proj. No. _____ F'eTatd - VIAtdtpcoeen-ti
Pa~rantd~c-+r, LOr~ctraa'es RIsjA & AVA~/- _ RMt. Y/,
PwItJ1X-,b.ALe)ro2.flC ______.r c
Al tMLJ-yv6 n o.M N .LA 0.
Ca~a M't C). 15LI 0 .227- 3AC
Chrrwy%:4~m13 ~q.3 11
I -on 60 L
a). DOU2Z U-. QCoS3
12- 4 2, N
Y~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t,~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O-O8 jjJ NTCEHRNNATIJONALCORORTOMMemorandurm.
To: Teresa Kovalcson Date: August 28,1995
From: Vickie Etheridge
Subject: Eielson AFB TEL Data Validation
The validation of the tetraethyl lead analysis has been completed per your request. I have reviewed the following: method development documentation, method detection limit study calibrations, (MDL), quality control, and sample analysis. The overall quality of the data package is very good; documentation of the method development and sample analysis was thorough. Problems seen with the data are inherent to the nature of the soil (i.e., samples matrix interferences). Qualifiers assigned to results in the data review process are as follows:
J- Analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is the approximate concentration of the analyte.
NJ- Analysis indicates the presence of an analyte that has been "tentatively identified" and the associated numerical value represents its approximate concentration. Table 5-1 (as provided by the laboratory) has been marked up to identify the assigned qualifiers.
You will find attached to this memo a data validation summary report and my hand-written notes. Please let me know if there are any questions concerning the validation process or if I may be of further assistance.
44-88 Table 5-1
Data Summary - Tetraethyllead (TEL) Analysis Results ______
Project: Eielson AFB ______Project No.: 409884.100904001______
Method: IT-TDL Procedure - GC/ECD ______Analytical Batch N: 3303 Matrix: Water Date Prepped: 7/14/95
Batch Blank: Blank 3303 ______Units: ug TELJL
I ~~~~~~~Date Date I FileTE Lab Sample No. Sample No. Sampled Analyzed j Name Results Qualifier -
BLANK 3303 ------7/18/95 Ieaft080.rst 5 tr tt- GG6809UF T001 7/7/95 7/19/95 eaftlo4.rst 36 GG681 OF H2007 7/7/95 7/1 8/95 eaftO1 .rst 8
U =Undetected at the PQL of 5 ppb. J_ ___j ______X =Amount is an estimated maximum possible amount due to the presence of GC peak interf erence.
KN/S-95/TDL/FIELSON AFB.409884/EAFDKR.DOC 1I of 15 Table 5-2
Data Summary - Tetraethyllead (TEL) Analysis ResultsI
Project: jEielson AFB ______Project No.: 1409884.10090400t1I____
Method: IT-TOL Procedure - GC/ECD ______
Analytical Batch #: 3305 ______
Matrix: Water______Date Prepped: 7/20/95 Batch Blanks: Blank 3305F and Blank 3305UF______I
Units: ug TEL/L ______
______~~~~Date Date! File TEL Lab Sample No. [ Sample No. Sape 4Aaye Name______Results Qualife
BLANK 3305F ------7/21/95 eaItI, 15.rst 5 lk
BLANK 3305UF I ------7/21/95 aftll6rst 5 GG6825F H2002 7/14/95 7/21/95 1eaftl 25.rst 5 w____ GG6826UF H2002 7/14/95 7/21/95 1eaftl 29.rst 5 U- u'- GG6827F H2017 7/14/95 I7/21/95 Jeaftl 26.rst ± •~- Y >GG6S2SUF H2017 7/14/95 17/21/95 Ieaftl3O.rst _8x GG683OUF H2020 7/16/95 i7/21/95 }eaftl3l.rst #-*2. GG6831 UF H201 9 7/16/95 7/21/95 I eafti1 17. rst 5 tr LtA GG6831 MS UIF H201 9 7/16/95 7/21/95 eaf ti 18. rst 9 GG6831 MSD UF H201 9 7/1 6/95 7/121/9:5 Ieaftl 19.rst 8 GG6832F I H2019 7/169 72/5 eaftl 20.rst [" 5 GG6S32MS F I H2019 7/16/95 7/21/95 eaftl2l.rst 4 J GG6832MSD F H2019 7/16/95 71721/95 eaftl 22.rst 3 $- T GG6833F H2020 7/16/95 7/21/95 eaftl 27.rst e 4?J- : GG6834UF H2018 7/16/95 7/21/95 eaftl 32.rst 5 u " GG6835F H2018 7/16/95 7/21/95 eaftl 28.rst S5
U =Undetected at the POL of S ppb. ______IX =Amount is an estimated maximum possible amount due to the presence of GC peak interference.
KN/89QST'DEJHELSON AFB.4O9SS4iEAFUKR.D0C 12 of 15 Table 5-3
Data Summary - Tetraethyllead (TEL) Analysis Results ____
Project: Eielson AFB j ______I______
Project No.: 409884.100904001 ______
Method: IT-TDL Procedure - GC/ECD ______Analytical Batch N: 3307 Matrix: Water Date Prepped: 7/25/95 11_____ Batch Blanks: Blank 3307F and Blank 3307UF I& Units: ug TEL/L
1 ______DateDat I File TEL till___ Lab Sample No. I Sample No. Sampled Analyzed I Name Results Qualifier
BLK 3307F ------7/25/95 1 eaftl49.rst 1 V BLK 3307UF -----..... 7/25/96 1eaftl 50.rst SU
GG6836F H201 5 7/1 7/95 7/25/95 eaftl 51 rst GG6837UF H2157/1I 7 /95 7/25/95 eaft I 52 .rst 1
GG6838F H2014 7/1 7/95 I7/25/95 eaftl 53.rst I 5 ______GGH201U6 7/17/95 7/259 efti 54.rst 5____ iu
/GG6840F I H 2016 7/1 7/95 7/25/95: 1afti1 55.rst 5____ Lt- L- GG6841 F Ti1002 1 7/17/95 I7/25/9 eat8rs .,?,) - fi-7T
GG6842F T1003 7/1 7/95 17/25/95 zfeatls9.rs~t 5 45 >"- GG6843UF T1004 E 7/17/95 F7/25/95 eaftl 60.rst 1I-~ Xjq
GG6844UF Ti1005 7/18/95 7/26/95 I eaftl 67.rst 319000 _____ GG6845UF H2014 7/17/95 7/25/95 eaftl 57.rst 3
U =Undetected at the PQL of 5 ppb. ______X =Amount is an estimated maximum possible amount due to the presence of GC peak interference.
KNIS-95/TDLJELSON AFB.4098841EAFDKR.DOC 13 of 15 Project Name & Number: 4f Aq5iW a ) 5cC
Method: QC Level: J~ Validation Samples: -Lb, dXci1 4A22 t dxŽ•92Lq 6ca%6&2 fixwi Lbo-
Data Validtion Report Summary
Status Code IComments 1. Preservation, Handling, and Holding Time A 2. Chain of Custody 4 * ift 3. Holding Time 4. Instrument
Performiance/Tuning AIA ______5. Calibrations 4 Ac44.~ t. c e 6. Blanks A
7. Blank Spik4 LCS A 4d*______8. Matrix Spike/Matrix LPY f Spike Duplicate A- 'Q 4-,i (4k/4-e /..k~r %C) 9. Surrogates AA 10. Internal Standards AIAk 11. Compound Idenfication x 12. System Performance
13. Field QC , A______
14. Overall Assessment x ______
Status Codes: A =Acceptable X =Data acceptable but qualified due to problems R =Data rejected 3JINTERNATIONALTECHNOLOGYQ
By X~•Date42 .Subject 4ttA-A(C 4- . Sheet No.- of __
tnkd. By...DaedProj. Na. _____ fit
() itt At~ ,meK 11IAS./a IchccJLJs//w y/~
;,A4"'t 5c;.IL,), VV~~~~
& /b~tc//tv 2kf4J ACi'Q b,'
~ lie-itt>C'4CAK 1W QC •alne!#
Qtn 5A4 /& 4~ 6~"/ ••&~~~~~~~~P,
00 'q&- ,C/ IjINTERNATIONAL ED CORPORATION0
By Date £~6Subject iic/ AOt 7?Wi- Sheet No.- of
htkd. By-Date Proj. No. ______
C,~~~~~~~
t - *ird%4 '1
- t'W,. &"IAA' 2~br>((c,20fl4 dJ;4-4znw
"IC 4,5r~,? errcrtyr
(lav / 0% v iY ,i.' 5
* (~ ~ r/, (t 17ru4(e n c4
A,~ -erke&e get'Jeu •%ysr ,-'A3 pity deg oA', c-Cre//c
&2 a V jt ~~~I9d-5:~/01096. !~z~
•5•ole.(o~O3g
'5 pAo~rJ'. 96 qfq ~ jlINTERNATIONAL
By "t Date .. 4HISubject 6iF'A(9 ttSheet Na... of jk.By.-Date Proj. No. _ ____
cc2V~ (J'c ~~~~~~;W X (t~~c~~b4 -44 Ad4/ 4o4 '~~~~~~ (3p~~( :9C11
/99t3-~cf3Y$2-5%Z' - -
if-c >105~~~~~~~~~~~~~.Vl
,0i5;
,~tU~i~':'faR - q5 - d icZNe
bv ~~ .4tO2le~ f 4
4 61' (a~i-pebb'-rvia~ecebazetriJ 'n AL-Jz 5 td jJINTERNATIONAL EDCORPORATION
By ~Date____Subject Sheet No.- of 0 n~kd. By-...... Date' . .Proj. No. ______
~~~,-,c 14.~
108-10-85 Qualifications:dookAj jc)c/ Significant Findings/Recommendations:,A /A V~e( t~aV Ž1eAI-h J)A -c26~~Lerw~. 4i-ct-4eT54r4-0J 40 43,- kL441ce J e elt Date Validat'or's Signature: Page of- DATA VALIDATION: DNA BY-GOPCSC(CLP) -1 - 0/1 QC Level: * Protect Na&me: C-Is fV Number. t - LaE~h04AtLReportNo: NumberzndlTypgaSamflPI / t (! t I) Holding Times IFWied ai Dole ~ Entsculo Anialsu SamplNo. tris collwet mrwtcioa Date Date Cmet NJot= Revewd 9WT) 7eQt,1A ~ OA uaamttttL 4 i 4 9,/5-- t 8NAby GGMS CLIPPae atuetpromneDealuorotrihoheflvlhosohifle (DFTPP) Standard Lill _ CheCk ( )ifO ______DFTPP Run 004I Viy Data SipmflmantI Ratio BIflgoved h Mewi causes Date ID PnITMUMaboSl fl ? iCalculattcm? Subtlctmn? I Spemtwmbol I =mocun ow _ ____a____ 1.CluaionCo*-MM I F(iiu Selectd MX_ AV Calibratin __mlalF LbRpr M I _D Cmoudwt ate A)Iitia Calibraato 1. CalulatioCheck Men A mnmuAMMltcpud..ciraon CalibrationC/MS SolacedTM BNA by GOe/MS - CLPPaec 'Ill) Calibration (Continued) A) Initial Calibratio (Continued) 3. Calculation Check - % RSD (Minimum I1cmpound peraoflrutin.umayU measfor mengRfl Ca4brauan *CtsPeCent Date ID Compound RSD IAgfee vttbLabftepon? 4. Any %RSD >30%?7 6 (lyuhest: Pencal GCIMS Caalbcad Compound RSD ID Datea- :RecommndedAcQti)1cvs ______C: 1. Any ORFcO'.06?7 A7O Usti:______this_ standard Ca~kads OCIMS Filename DMt ID CpudRRP 1-7r' 2 RewnSmaw 1 .- j It a~baamsl R/q NAby eN~S - CLP Page Li of H 'lCalibration (Continued) B) Continuing Calibration (Continued)t 2. Calculation Check - % D (Minimum I compound per standard) Smandard I Calibration SG Ml FaReue IRetl Date ID Compound % 0 Agree wtth Lab Report'I 3. Any % 0 >-25% (If )thSea 1t) Stiandard CAibrada Rfemame DMs Compound SD H ______2 , S t 5#K Pt?~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~6' - C C~~~~hC14/ ;t , we' 5,C~c p- C 4 Ce tt glitc~Ch - ~ ,7 V Recammeuded%~vy'/cAalorn :-eA LI-k 4cr b.4~L~g~yy~t~. a.~s behto(~;A//)ffr~t~s- O C 1 t r ~~;'itt hji. cl P r ~ 3~ s iA ~'~/ ~ab >¾~~' 6 ,~xLAf~ aL{ tQ LUL .'~ ~ (~~cv~ C(QPt)'c. &- !~ci Pc~- hr~xttjtWVCC'~O'. 5..~r& ii - I ~~~- 14, W~~~~S~ ~ L777~ " SNA by GCIMS- CLP Page o IVn Blank.s 1. Form IV(s) present? 0 2. Method btank reported for each matrix, concentration level, extraction batch as appropriate?,Zi- It ao* then ezplair ______ 3. Mny common phthaiate esters' (lab contaminants) detected? (if -yes then list:) bkjZ2-cthythxv)phthalate or d14N.butylphihalate, eg. Blank Date ID Exrced Contaminants (specify compound, concentration. unit) 4.ote TD or TC.detcted? XC _I__thnW 5. Any cnainants detected in FB or ER samples? /+(If 'yea then Wzt:) sample Dane ID Counted CfpomundfyCamimnuradoe(a). sued* win Note: DO NOT 1Wt cmpoafS adjustS1011 to 'ND bald 81usodAtadla blank atamanaiuce ain ih=nc. Recommended Andes V) Surrogiate Recoveily 4 1. Form II present? All samples listed? t . Entries agree with raw data? _ ___ (If nto for mny answr lapin below.) QAC==MWDUC11Z~ 4-h: -DNA by GCMrtSi CLIP PageJI of c Surroate Recovery (Continued) 2. Mny runs with > 2 rec~overies outside limits? /(if *yest then Us::) Run R3Bat Re-analymis Re-Run INumber Rcov4tes Date Recovedas Comments All method blank surrogates within limits? S(f cpibeaq RecoSSaseded Actiorn * qMatrix Spike I Matrix Salts Dualicate Pairs 1. Number of - an Malye:______Mafll: sodl water ______ Frequency: ______ *2. Formn Ill(s) present? AtReasutt envries agres wilhl raw data? ___ % A, RPO Calculations OK? "p 3. ANl % R.PO wuthin1 lmit? kSZL (if ntthannic) MWMBD ID___ ca"M 96 f RPD Re tfzedeAction: -b-V~ C~Jc) cv~t& A 3L CS LI~~ W 7~C ASU ZII~t RWANNO A ewpow ~~~~~~"/7 QACM=~--- wt byGSQtrt- CLIP ae o Vii) Field Duplicates 1. Are original/field duplicatepFairs identifiable? A1l//I (ifWWa bM LW) Matri oigina Duplicate rgn Dpct Matixamle o.SampleiNo. Mmati Sam LaNa. 6a 2. Overall frequency,______3. Commnts (Evaluate RPDs for positive paired Manas): $4111) Internal Standards Performance 1. Form VlIIApreoer~t: Nl/it Areau/RTagree withrSwdata? fL"4r a{ 8tu- J~'fw< 1&LXI 2. All sample/lank ISarea wiMl limbt? / List exceptions: 3. Alt sampl~jlari ISRM witM 30asecods of standard IS RT? VIrI% List exeptios: Recon* c/rrJ I-tLnnd &(t ct 0 sAcrtitCjAc•> ReviffnedDYAD ONA by GC/MS -CIP Page . fi. ,i compound Identification and Ouarititatlon Check if Yu Sample Campoun and Result RTt Spectrai1Ca usuQualhIfed Result (if differentj Number Reporned match match 4CUIX Comaenus c4~.z-2-,A QA~~~~~~~~~- re-u-i-L~ Pae o attk by GejMS ClJ ae o IX) Tentatively Identified Compounds 1. Have aHl peaks that should be weatched, been searched and report?'/Jr 2. Any TICs found insamples also in associated blanks? , 3. Are reasonable identfifcations reported? AO ~ 4. Any TCL compounds reported as TICS? 4t 4 nefdedAclac I1 Itk '-sileJ XI) System Performance Check for and explain any of to fOlOwing 1.Abrupt RICbaselinelhift N C 2tHigh baccoudMorRT '' Y 3. Baseline rise at high ts'prflnW: xit 4. ExianoGus peal ______5. Loss of peak reecon:w Ago~ 6. Peak taling or upltflg: ______ Recmem Li 5 OA~~~~~~~~~~ . at SNA by GcMS- CaP XIII Overall Assessment C. L~~~~~~~~~~~~ <)ttji / I .-t-,~~~~~~~~~~~I 7L COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report lient: International Tethmology Corporation Service Request. K9504406 Project: Eielson 409884 Date Collected: 7/17/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/18/95 Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons Sample Name: H2021 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: K954406&003 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Naphthalene EPA 3510A 8310 1 0.106 1 7/18/95 7/18/95 ND - Acenaphthylene EPA 3510A 8310 I 0.162 I 7/18/95 7/18/95 ND - Acenaphthene EPA 3510A 8310 I 0.057 I 7/18/95 7/18/95 ND, Fluorene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.006 I 7/18/95 7/18/95 ND- Phenanthrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.015 1 7/18/95 7/18/95 ND- Anthracene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.004 1 7/18/95 7/18/95 ND- 'Iuoranthene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.008 1 7/18/95 7/18/95 ND- .Arene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.004 1 7/18/95 7/18/95 ND' Benz(a)anthracene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.006 1 7/18/95 7/18/95 ND- Chiysene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.009 1 7/18/95 7/18/95 ND- Benzo(b)fluoranthene EPA 35 10A 8310 0.2 0.009 1 7/18/95 7/18/95 ND- Benzo(k)fluoranthene EPA 35 10A 8310 0.1 0.003 1 7/18/95 7/18/95 ND, Benzo(a)pyrene EPA3510A 8310 0.1 0.003 1 7/18/95 7/18/95 ND'& T. Dibenz(a,h)antlracene EPA 3510A 8310 0,1 0.010 I 7/18/95 7/18/95 NtYI-S• Benzo(g,h,i)perylene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.009 1 7/18/95 7/18/95 ND14fT [nideno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.007 I 7/18/95 7/18/95 Nq Approved By:______Date: 0440SV0 ANI -I '/24'5 PageN. - ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~aoLof /.J~ DATA VALIDATION: 3N-6-6IM-GLP)- QC Level:Th1 Project Name: 6eI0w A-~ Number. L1QOct Specwa Imnst-iOM iiHolding Timeos Dame Imnw EnWWaa. sAAAO IFIeld Comments Sample NO. M4atS Cafhao Psmeto Datam Date loo)I1X/9 I-s~~ &-3~ * PH2PL~w~i P~oi weec '.'4 ______v- . - v 1 ~~~~ ~ I______ _ _ _ _ _t______ Vt- ' -e~lt H-Iw~ -Aco Pages atof- BNA by GC/MS - CIP (DFTPPI Standard II '~swumeint pefrac:Dcfurtiohnflpthoshifl BaCFluA~d I MOMI DFTiPP Run i GCMS7V u SpilI RAUm CAu to IIuuco~ PI*~ Dae IVm iahti~oxt-cces'ty -0 ftcomnddAIt L clkt~ru/ fMUCThM rC~~ tMS4trLre J 4r t#Phe l 2jrqICzc~o III) Callibr Ion A) Initial Calbration 1. Calculation Check- Meom FM? (fMinim I com sd prcatation 2. AyMeam RRF cO0.O5 ,yfrit themlin) meanoci cmound4" aw..s ar~w~/4(i44t~i O//ACI~tU BNA byGC/MS -CLP Page - of i 1ll) Calibration (Continued) A) Initial Calibratio (Continued) 3. Calculation Check -% RSD (Missnu I compend per cabbibtiom pnywa -m as fw cown RRfl Caflbration icf Fores: Date I I Compound RSD Aim'.ckt Lab Report? 4. Any % RSO > 30%? VeIOW at Perem 0acne Calhiuona Compound RSD jLC ID Darn z CsAai~±hrctd~S- 301,C 2-C oe /A B) Continuing Calibratio 1.Any RRF c 0.05 ? IL.... araw_____ Suawdaf Otanda OCMIS fleas. ~~~DaM ID cmon 5NA byGC/MS-CLP Pag~o s(f ICalibration (Continued) 6) Continuing Calibration (Continued)t 2. Calculation Chec* -% 0 (Minimum 1 compound per standard) Standard I CalibratioIadesiabert vcvhLbRpr FUOMUCn Ret Dates A 1 Compun I 3. Mny %D0 It-Yo Iy'tal Stndard Clulbuau FUCUUsi DMommoS S D cJF-xF- o-ThiRglq~ Be zQl a- A-&tJDV MS .)I - +d~ s vQt '.y~I; -k3 eO4-a/uofe 4 s£teMv ~,-~Os dLf-krinhL Co'Ik6"cLk {&tor.-tery tt*Vt ShnL4.f-ltkecNS de~etorj 4 4oi.'e ) St' -9or pai ddec~or~s £±.-- cowfl-' 5 of- JtflUr54, ONL CAR- COft~xflL-4 kod leD;0c fl LS 4L c 1CU C~~ot.o. )4.2tJOaryCbr--- iit~ bJere~r~SL&V~ &ccoret ZL{h1 A O I 3C Returns 477 P6 C ~~OA CA.1ThS-a BNA byGC/MS -CLP Page..l of .N) Blanks 1. Form IV(s) present?z4 ~* 2. Method blank reported for each matrix, concentration level, extraction batch as appropriate?4 ______If O*nV then explain: ______3. Any common phtialato esters' (lab contaminants) detected? Al//A- (If )as then sE:) bit(24ehy~hvlltlPbthalat6 or di-N-butylphthalate, eg. Blank Date ID Emtracted Contaminants (spf compond. concentration uu -- 4. other TCL* or TICs. democted? 10(fO tham ID Exraced Cmfa tc*On L.A~Ynyuonnimrwt detete in FS or ER samples xdtfw Ve then Wet: sample Dar ID CadeoSe Compai vYoeetablusa.du- Note DorNOTIMstwup=6l adju toa ¶4 bust an modted lab blank ccnmmfhmadm in fl section. V) Surrocate Recovey 1.Form II present? IA~ 41'All samples lised? Entries agree with raw data? ([f'ad' for an" answe explins below.) it esil QA CamnatH1S IL ONA byGC/MS -CLP PageC9 of CO i Surrootvte Recqver (Continued) 2. Any runs with Z 2 recveries outside limits? (If yws then fit:) Run R*anaiwt&C RG*Rua Number Rat*owiqS ______ All methiod blank marrogates within limits? (If no explain bciw.) Ji Matrix Spike I Matrix Satke Duplicate Pairs 1. Number of pairsnwaled _ __)/0 Mawr.ai watter____ Frequeny ______..2L...... ______ 2. Form IIf(s) presmwt.__..4ft...... Result enuee agree wilth raw data? ___ % R. RPO Caiculafons OK? i 3. ANl % R. RIPD witM lib Uu0bs ID comumid9R P RecommededA'¶ ctoiamt'eTw'L--tU014t CPZ rafr L k rCoerY zS1 +/ ,ctt~abkq l olkrtA f~ uora07ttktr+, ttY.c'rt reoveryc W4-,ktk shpd// c/oovt Wf-pIP-I 4 II 7 i&kcr&t~~I~vrrc~oait"vZnAtX ~4trt4cceta 4 & OA Cks-'ue"V- ' 1Ae67 Al0 c\Cbhr-cfr 'NA by GC/MS -CLP PageJ Of -C Vill Field Duglicate 1.Are original/field duplicat pairs identifiable? 6 t (t~~s pi No Matrix Sample No. a. _ __ _ Samle 2. Overall frequency,______3. Comments (Evaluate RPOs for post" paird analylse): ,/ IIIntamaL.StamdWdflU-Redfl~nffaff Sys4eni Monjtbri?) Cva-o~ 1.Form VIllIA prssnt7...ILfL.. Arhau/RT agree wili raw dat? Nia ff. ~btrc t ¾ rY knot tt~ 5 tea.- 2 All sample/blank ISarea wifl Omit? AI- Ust wexepna: Th, a-ees cr.p he-w-&wsa~gref-I-t 4-La/ribrutYowt du4e I 6-4e4ciA. AIN abPCt~kljL4Wa~0w IgargA oeak 3. All sample/blwl IS IRim wAilt3 a teonmde of soandad ISRT? e List exceptionit': Recstmeidd ct*s Tk 4' mIV\5 werc- &re iCteV ~ t- v4/)ActhlohJ t.. 5tttxer-(JL j were t a~ Raftjk4Arl 7d < OAommSC.L 4~ SNA by aC/MS -CiP Page-Iof (c .A Compound Identification and Q0uantitatlon Check if !Ymes______S8910a compound adRSt1RT SPOOM IC41CULIUG QIu"Aj5O Result (if different) INumber eoe Match match or. Casmame endd toh e ' .. n - -M~ NAR byGCIMS.-CILP Page4..-of MX Tentatively Identified Compounds I. Have an peaks that should be sarched, bean searched and reported? 4eC 2. Any TICs found insamples also hin associated blanks? /Vo 3. Are reasonable idsndflflafo reported? y'ei 4. Any TCL compounds reported -s TICS? V C bI~ rCIV4 XI0 Systemn Performance Chock fin' and explain any of toe following: 1. Abrupt UC basellflhlft A/V 2tHigh backgrounld orRTS~ H0NO 3. Baseline rise at high UnlerMjr: o 4. EXMtIAiw Pedu S.Lou oftPo*e6mJotLm= 6. Peak tailing or sp"ng- 7 ReokmmendedActca a Ma- 'r' PagsiL of BNA byGC/MS -CLP XII) Overall Assessment COCCCC(A CCL PCCWX ~poktorx4n- COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Itlient. hiternational Technology Corporation Service Request; K9504730 I. Project: Eielson AFB/#409884 Date Collected: 7/27/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/31/95 Polynuci car Aromatic Hydrocarbons Sample Name: P4002 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: K9504730-002 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Naphthalene EPA3510A 610 1 0.2 1 8/3/95 8/8/95 9 / Acenaphthylene EPA 3510A 610 16 16 1 8/3/95 8/8/95 NDX DF Acenaphthene EPA 3510A 610 1 0.4 1 8/3/95 8/8/95 ND' 7 DT Fluorene EPA 3510A 610 0.2 0.1 1 8/3/95 8/8/95 ND/ DT Phenwithrene EPA 3510A 610 0.1 0.02 1 8/3/95 8/8/95 ND / Anthracene EPA 3510OA 610 0.1 0.004 1 8/3/95 8/8/95 ND/ 7luoranthene EPA 3510A 610 0.2 0.02 1 8/3/95 8/8/95 N4D>' DT .yrene EPA 3510A 610 0.2 0.01 1 8/3/95 8/8/95 NDIZ DT Benz~a)anthracene EPA 3510A 610 0.1 0.006 I 8/3/95 8/8/95 ND-~ Chrysene EPA 3510A 610 0.1 0.009 1 8/3/95 8/8/95 NlD'7 Benzo(b)fluoranthene EPA 3510A 610 0.2 0.009 1 8/3/95 8/8/95 NDI Benzo(k)fluoraathene EPA 3510A 610 0.1 0.003 1 8/3/95 8/8/95 ND / Bwzo(a)pyene EPA 3510OA 610 0.1 0.003 1 8/3/95 8/13/95 ND cq Dibenz~a,h)anthracene EPA 3510A 610 0.1 0.01 1 8/3/95 8/13/95 NDZC~ Benzo(g,h,i)perylene EPA 3 510OA 610 0.2 0.009 1 8/3/95 8/13/95 Nl?'~ Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene EPA 3510A 610 0.1 0.007 1 8/3/95 8/13/95 ND"" Approved By: '1 Date: g'rtfb GAIMSVANI -It/lW9 Pap No u000S COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report 2lient: International Technology Corporation Service Request: K9504730 Project. Ejelson AFB/#409884 Date Collected: 7/27/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/31/95 Polyrnuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons Sample Name: P4003 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: K9504730-003 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Naphthalene EPA 3510A 610 1 0.2 1 8/3/95 8/9/95 ND~ Acenaphthylene EPA 3510A 610 1 0O.2 1 8/3/95 8/9/95 ND.~ Acenaphthene EPA 3510A 610 1 0.06 8/3/95 8/9/95 ND) Fluorene EPA 3510A 610 0.2 0.006 1 8/3/95 8/9/95 ND,- Phenanthrene EPA 3510A 610 0.1 0.02 1 8/3/95 9/9/95 NDI/ Anthracene EPA 3510A 610 0.1 0.004 I 8/3/95 8/9/95 NDI' '71uoranthene EPA 3510A 610 0.2 0.008 1 8/3/95 8/9/95 ND- :,yrene EPA 3510A 610 0.2 0.004 1 8/3/95 8/9195 NDt Benz~a)anthracene EPA 3510OA 610 0.1 0.006 1 8/3/95 8/9/95 ND,-7 Chrysene EPA 3510A 610 0.1 0.009 I 8/3/95 8/9/95 ND Benzo(b)fluoranthene EPA 3510A 610 0.2 0.009 1 8/3/95 8/9/95 ND-'7 Benzo(k)fluoranthene EPA 3510OA 610 0.1 0.003 1 8/3/95 8/9/95 ND Benzo(a)pyrene EPA 3510A 610 0.1 0.003 I 8/3/95 8/13/95 ND- Dibenz(a,h)anthracene EPA 3510A 610 0.1 0.01 1 8/3/95 8/9/95 ND Benzo(g,hi,i)perylene EPA 3510A 610 0.2 0.009 1 8/3/95 8/9/95 ND/" ffideno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene EPA 3510A 610 0.1 0.007 I 8/3/95 8/9/95 ND/' Approved By: ______Date: • QA13OSVGAN I .2 VIj95 Pag No.. 00 00 COLUMBIA'ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report lient: International Technology Corporation Service Request: K9504730 Project: Eielson AFB/#4O9884 Date Collected: 7/27/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7131195 Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons Sample Name: P4011I Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: K(9504730-004 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Naphthalene EPA 3510A 610 1 0.2 1 8/3/95 8/9/95 Nfl- Acenaphthylene EPA3510A 610 1 0.2 1 8/3(95 8/9/95 ND-' Acenaphthene EPA 3510A 610 1 0.06 1 8/3/95 8/9/95 N) Fluorene EPA 3510A 610 0.2 0.006 I 8/3/95 8/9/95 ND -' Phenanrthrene EPA 3510A 610 0.1 0.02 1 8/3/95 8/9/95 ND' Anthracene EPA 3510A 610 0.1 0.004 1 8/3/95 8/9/95 ND' .1oranthene EPA 3510A 610 0.2 0.008 1 8/3/95 8/9/95 NDl .yeeEA31A60 02 0.0 //5 899 D Byenze ntrceeEPA 3510A 610 0.1 0.006 1 8/3/95 8/9/95 ND'- Bhyene~nfiaeeEPA 3510A 610 0.1 0.009 1 8/3/95 8/9/95 NDl" Chyeneob urateeEPA 3510A 610 0.2 0.009 1 8/3/95 8/9/95 ND-' Benzo(b~fluoranthene EPA 3510A 610 0.1 0.003 I 8/3/95 8/9/95 ND' Benzo(k)fluratene EPA 3510A 610 0.1 0.003 1 813/95 8/13/95 ND-/ Dibenz(a,h)anthracene EPA 3510A 610 0.1 0.01 1 8/3/95 8/9/95 NDl Benzo(g,h,i)peryiene EPA 3510A 610 0.2 0.009 1 8/3/95 8/9/95 ND),-' ffideno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene EPA 3510A 610 0.1 0.007 1 8/3/95 8/9/95 Nfl- )~pprovecl By: 1 'Date: Kqf IS22/52595 0473OSVO ANI 3 W1&95 Pt. No- 0001 .8Nkby~~~~~~6C/M~~~~r~~~tP~Page 1 oft f DATA VALIDATION: BAB CM CP Project NAMe: F- eSh1~)k\tF Number LV9S QC Level: :rlz Lab iDflS950i1q Report N4o: T Numbet and Type otsamplwr 2k.&j-c Special IrwtructiOAS: I) Holding Times Flewatit Date Extcioa DAnte ome Sample No. %ftiz. - ee ln Dt Dte Comment 2 0 - I 3 _____oo_ R_ / _ N O M______I ______ RteconMmedl n- i okre~y~ U ~Q smis BNAby GONS-tIP ~~~~~~~~Page ofaID I"-instrument Performance: Decafluorotriohenvlohosohine (DFTPP) Standard 2 Check ( rifor1 DFrPP Run I GC/MS IPunY Data Saigmtaft I Ratio BackuasI me= Date ~ ID Pra? _Tnmaibeg? Flm? 'Calcusatim?lSubaucuons? I fcauom?I A)IitarClbrto __ __ Date ID___ I at e F______w __ _port__ _____ IMen CIAO C =_"L_ RCommendd Action: ~ eer4)rM~4n-iC Oh ~.CZS #tV# c 41 c -de acflael Re~-w~~ Jr4 OAramwni2McOdO4heaho~ ~~VA b, G~~~~~~~~~iM&tDLP ~~~~~~~~Page of I ) 111) Calibration (Continued) A) Initial Calibration (Continued) 3. Calculation Check - % RSD (Mi'nimu IwmPountd Pff alibsltmotM.mam unee as for mean RRfl Date ID CompoundRS 4. Any %RSD>30%?.7 A(It. everuthmnbcs Tk~ hto~t cabtm fo c alm 4 o atCv t AV~ CadalCtdm 00743I F~~~ssingDes ID ______~~~~~~~~~~~~~~e-, gEMs wv9&&mw j 'd< ACCAc!aY'k rSNA :, C/M Page t of I "1Calibration (Continued) B) Continuing Calibration (Continued) 2. Calculation Check - % D (Minimum I compound per standard) Standard I Cahlabrano 0014 F~lename Red. Data ID compound j D ccwt a e on 3. Mny % 0> 4-5% (if tiesft t Standard Ca~nibdm Rlam. Om Cowpud *D 9 t RO06. f8e, 2o 9.' .0 RinsuisdhmulAc= -Pte ta~oro,Pr Aid Iw+ref ottf a9{' OsDTke. res')ewer cacdcl c~efr -t %11 bs 4o delttmkc lcom.tpancti -ite t&krxr tA 51,mut+antecqs de-4e4-rs 4-vdA-r'dS ItCO'wpe~nJS 04-)neres+. ¼L O41. (C v~y / aauwmm 9 &Q(OP~ ty" gfpgf9<,V QA~P L/ -TOc~jLOt -'-e O~~~arby-GC/MS~~~~~~~Glt" ~~PageE of IV) Blanks- 1. Form IV(s) present? 16 2. Method blank reported for each matrix, concentration level, extraction batch as appropriate?)d If aoW then explain: ______ 3. Mny common phthaiateaesters' (lab contaminants) detectd? . ~ (fytte it bi&24ethcYlhm)phthalare or di-N-butylphthalate, ell. Blank Date S. Ay cntaminants detected inFIB or ER samp les'? vf (t haut Sample Data ID Codete QhaSW Gi Note: DO NOT 11ht Cmapana adjust to N' beet am ma1001ad lab blank casmiaminum a thWacion VI Surrogate Recovery 1. Form II present? .All samples listed? Entries agrne with raw data? jrfnro for amy aswe exlain betowi. Rnt ~~~~~QACmnnD ,7a Pag of 'I Surraoate Recovery (Continued) 2. Any runs with > 2 recoeries outside limits? (If ycVa then list:) Number ReocovefiJ R aeRcmra All mefthd blank surrogates withi limits? (If no* cqPIAifeir Recommended Action: %"11Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Dupilicate Pairs 1. Number of pairs mnaiyndzs______( U Maftr: sod WNW _ ___ Frequency ______2. Form Ill(s). preuer tV4L. Results enties ages wilth raw data? % R. RPO Calculationa OK? 3. All % R, RPD withinOis (I %n thenlit) ID Calrnuami ___R_ ~~NA b~~~~~CC/MS-C!) ~~~~~~~Page 7 Of( VII) Field Duvlicates 1.Are original/field duplicate pairs identifiable? thf2. rwsk Mautri Sample No. NO. matri Sample No. 4 ~is No. 2. Overall frequency: j, 3. Comments (Evaluaft RPOs for pouitive paired analyst): ~V~lI)ll Internal Standards Performance 1. Form VillA present: gp 4 j . + AueaaRTagree withlrawdaft? ld &orctr t K~V 5L~ o,4 4 5Y sL at 4- r; +0v t 4 &qa er & Oa J t a t All ua n ip l e bia lf IS arsea w i Utmifts' Ust exceptions: 3. All s am pl e/b l f l IS RTeYAM~ 30 seconds of sti d eo d IS RT? List excep tionst ~LILDf r ~ tA)r k Q Ai n C 9 Pagelj oft ...omnundIdentification and Quantitaticit Fsampie -Coseeund and Rasul I RT Spann, Ca~tajauo QuaidAed Result (if duifareas Number I Revatd ~MataIMataI OK Comanutes 10 iL-Zu ______V i ,-ONAby tiUMUe ageo iat IC) (XI Tentatively Identified Compounds 1.Hane all peaks that should be mearched, buen searched and reported? Ve) 2. Any TICs found in samples also in associated blanks? Alo 3. kre reasonable identifications reported? Yef______ 4.Any TCt. compounds repora as TiCs? ? XI) System Perfomancm Check for and explain any cfthe fdowlng. 1.Abrupt FtC baseline shift A/,0 2.High baickgound or RT shlt 1- 3. Baselri rise at hig Wf'Iwfljrs: o/ 4. Extranteo peft go 5. Loss of peak reeckidor= 6. Peak tailing or aplltg o a-.. 9 q( QACanwn~m 5NA-bv-GC7W 2 ~~~~~~~tP ~PageL tooIC) X1I) Overall AssessmentI u~n/' Caji~&~bAWaj A'-de t,~rvtL/ &wereCA -J Se•,trett co n4Aruv{?w Cqi bva~lbl rats- d£zl eoInI- Ta mfe rc5'-t s r-epcr-d &,>eet- baSed ~~j4-zt rep~~~r~~d~e C~'OLC t..s . COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report lient ~~~~International Technology Corporation Service Request: K(9504918 Project: Eielson AFBI#409884 Date Collected: 8/3/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: Sf195 Polymuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons Sample Name: P4020 Units: ugtL (ppb) Lab Code: K9504918-001 Basis: NA Test Notes: prep Analysis Dilation Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Naphthalaic EPA 35IOA 610 1 0.2 1 8/10(95 8123/95 ND- Acenaphthylene EPA3510A 610 1 0.2 1 8/10/95 8/23195 ND' Acenaphthene EPA 3510A 610 1 0.06 1 8/10/95 8/23/95 ND' Fluorene EPA 3510OA 610 0.2 0,006 1 8/10/95 8/23195 ND-' Phenanthrene EPA 3510A 610 0.1 0.02 1 8/10/95 8/23/95 0.02 -'' J Antlnacene EPA 3510A 610 0.1 0.004 1 8110/95 8/23/95 NDr' ,luoranthene EPA 3510A 610 02 0.008 1 109 8/35 N r keyrne EPA 3510A 610 0.2 0.004 1 8/10/95 '813/95 NDr Benzga)anthracene EPA 3510A 610 0.1 0.006 I 8/10/95 8/3/95 ND-~ Chrysene EPA 3510A 610 0.1 0.009 1 8/10195 8/23/95 ND) Beno(b~flluoranthene EPA 3510A 610 0.2 0.009 1 a/10195 8/3/95 Nl)~' Benzok)fluoranthene EPA 3510A 610 0.1 0.003 1 8/10/95 8123/95 NDr- Benzo(a&pyT=n EPA 3510A 610 0.1 0.003 1 8110/95 8/23/95 ND ~- Dibenz(a,h)anthracene EPA 3510A 610 0.1 0.01 1 8/10/95 8/23/95 ND-' Beno(g~h,i)pexylene EPA 3510A 610 0.2 0.009 1 8/10/95 8/23/95 ND, hidcno(l,2,3-cd)pyrcne EPA 3510OA 610 0.1 0.007 1 8/10/95 8/23/95 ND . By:Date:By:roved IS221052593 U491RSVG.ANI .1 VIM PageNo COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Cilient: International Technology Corporation Service Requese 1(95o4918 Project: Eielson ALFB/#409884 Date Collected: 8/3/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: Sf195 Polymuclear Aromatic Hydrocarborns Sample Name: Ff2022 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: K(9504918-002 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Naphthalene EPA 3510A 610 1 0.2 1 8/10/95 8123/95 ND- Acenaphthylene EPA 3510A 610 1 0.2 1 8110/95 &/23/95 NDC Acenaphtlicne EPA 3510A 610 1 0.06 1 8/10/95 8/23/95 ND Fluorene EPA 3510A 610 0.2 0.006 1 8/10/95 8/23/95 NDr~ Phernanthrene EPA 3510A 610 0.1 0.02 1 8/10/9$ 8/23/95 ND, Anthracene EPA 3510A 610 0.1 0.004 1 8/10/95 8/23/95 ND.- jluranfluene EPA351OA 610 0.2 0.008 1 8/10/95 8/23/95 NDCe tlyrenc EPA 3510A 610 0.2 0.004 1 8/10/95 8/23/95 ND,~ Benz(a)anthracene EPA 3510A 610 0.1 0.006 1 8/10/95 8/23/95 ND - Chiysene EPA 3510A 610 0.1 0.009 1 8/10/95 8/23/95 ND- Benzo(b)fluoranthene EPA 3510A 610 0.2 0.009 1 8/10/95 8/23/95 NDC Benzo(k)fluorarnhenc EPA 3510A 610 0.1 0.003 1 8/10/95 8/23/95 NDW- Benzo(a)pyrene EPA 3510OA 610 0.1 0.003 1 8110195 8/23/95 ND-- Dibenza~h)anthracene EPA 35I10A 610 0.1 0.01 I 8/10/95 8/23/95 ND~" Benzo(g~hi)perylene EPA 3510A 610 0.2 0.009 1 8/10/95 8/23/95 NlDv 1ndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene EPA 3510A 610 0.1 0.007 1 8/10/95 8/23/95 NDK- Approved By: ______Date: 1S22/0525fl 0491&SV&ANI -2 8255MM~w Page c f t .ola*lS by GC/MS - CIP DATA VALIDATION: VOLATILES By GC/M tCLP) QC LMvL. Prolec-tNafflC PCF Number. Number and Type of Sampu Lab ID: 9-73 ~'Rewon No:- speciai Instructions: oc o- O) Holding Tfimsl Darn Comments ISalm is'dNo. Mjtflerai CnOt S~y q q 95 11? 71 ______IYk 7 9~~~~II1/ r - - - -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -?3-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2-0C - - - -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Recomaefdd Ato o Volatlies by GC/MS -.Ppa12 !V strmeftPnoranc: somfluorobeflzene (SF8) Standard tajWa 7~l~Icanmat S-F! Run GC/MS SIM Os I r~~ateIII 7kW~~~kcIA 40(04Ž0A-. liii Calibration A) Initial Calibratio Form VI A present?- I cocabato 1. Calculation Check - MGM RFmilmumn ReaS en 'CaImratiO OCM a 1wt a oats ID RUtMuk '. r ac 2.Auy MewnRRIF cO.O6 ? D OA t am Rr~~tivdRB? ID Pageoj3tof volatilS by GCIMS - CI.P d alibrat~io Cnnud A) Initial CalibrationqfiCotnued) .w~.f m2inplot an 3. Calculation Check - % ASD (M~nuiwmu nsm riciMS Cr iCaLibration wiii Date ID MRSDM Agree ~/ q7 Ps3 V (Ae- kA veS 4.A %RSD)>30%? 0Ii *theu lbtl COWS Calbraltot Pes omet Compon IData URED)t -I~~~~~~~~~~~~ k f/ot~v 4tuore~ B) Corvnuinuk3 Cal~brtion- Form VAuk preset? A~& i. AnyRRFF CO.O6t.V 0u esten m) m= RiP FHs. DM IDOr ltevww Dam J 119~OA CSmew.YOLM u~~~~~~~~~~tt Page .j...of I volatiles by GC/MS - CLP Il)Calibration {Continlued B) Cofltinui~o CalibredfiLO113Crt*ufd i compound per standard) 2. Calculation Check- % 0 (Minimum SC/- albruQ G %D Aretwitb Lab Re wt' Standar ID I Compound Fiename Ret.! Date / rt'9oe.1 P3:~oLIti~ 1 4-p bI Pbo I Id - . 9S L+90.2S ' 0' . "v' ) 3. Any % 0 > 25% ? .Žk- StandartCaIV3IIOU ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ GA CSOIV09DO ae So Volatiles by GC/MS - CL? Iy Stanks level, GC/MS system as appropriate? $/C-- 2. Method blank reported for each matrix, concantration lIfmo, cqipat detectd? /VD f tnli) 3.A common lab contamninamts Concentration S unlits Blotk GCWLS Date M~tla Mso Toluene 2-butanante ID ID RUA hoie thenlvac 4.Other TCLsmorTICSd(if C CamO~chn~i= ID ID Rua lwee AlIC 5. An contaminants; detected InFS, Ts, Or ER 0h Blank Date IdkyWe IV. S. NNO ate:DO 3M capinta m¶1'NW bwe uScmaedlbbnkotmitinSlm RecomUCdm Are VA Surrogate RecoverY samples liteOW - 1. Formr 11 A present? _____All. (Wif iWfomay anwa eplailn WekE) Entries agree whh raw data? 195-OA 7A5~~~~~~~~IL anus mw~~~~~~wf1KLQ~~~~rt~~~tu¶/$ 1%3/9 < CA iii 4'~~~~~~~~~~~~~~,al Page .of L Volatiles by OC/MS - CLP \flSurrOOatS RecoverY Co0n-tin-ued) limits? (11 yathea it:) 2. Any runt witi om (1 or morercoveries outside nniRe-Run Sample suxst comments ID Ca ,n % Recover (If IWoexplain below.) All method blank surrogateSwtilmts 1______1. Number of Pa- nlam"O&______water__ Mabt Frequency'____ stl agres with raw data? 2. Form IIl A preseltlf'10___ FlemuiW % R. RPID CaiWuld0fl OK? - he w 3. All % R, RtPD wifl hinibli Sampl ~~nr~~b _t rt JA -4 Revwad tt/24Q)mlla Pagej Of *J sile by GC/MS -CLP VII) Field Dpmlicates (iftYee then Istv) 1.Are original/field duplicate pairs identlirtbItL.A6±.... auigiasi Duplicate Oqi11asi Duplicte Mrb Samole No Sam-o-m Mau Sm o.Sam No. 2. Overall frsquerlcr /i analyftm): 3. ComRMen (Evaluat RPOS for posiiv paired 1. Form VIllA Preaflt4ZdZ.... vawa' tat Areas/RT ages wiO raw daft? A/Vc 2. All sample/biWl ISWMea wil lm A/ofaul/i List exceptkon:_ ISRi"?/tcabr 3.Al MIaPledbflISRTG a" 30 aeconds of standad List exceptlons: CA Cnm~ Rcvwaqd Bomm qs Page ,~of - votatles by GC/MS - CI! r>Como~ufd Identificaln Qnuantitatlon alculatioql QuLalfed Result (if different) Sample Compam and Rasut j T 'pcr ReponeS (1013I A) IMth ach KIcoinctait Number ______Ltja Leb-t 40 (A . 1=2 E0k/bezpn • 1 -7- - ______O~~~~Y e 360 -0 I .. z.L £0. ______i-VOOS ~ e ------~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~. ~ O)Xe~ -f( - -r ~. tO L ______Pagel of f '..Aiatiwf by GC/MS - C.? (XI Tentatively Identified Compounds (Form I E)7 1. Have all peaks that should be saeched, been searched and reported Akre~q~.scth-er- +k1,uxL BT7&A, wee-r rC~v4 - a &eerLA -SCr -psrX7k4t, 2. Any TICS found in samples also ini associated bianks? /l 3. Are reasonable id~nientlaiOnS repored At//- 4. Any TCL compounds repfld as TICS? /- XI) System Performance Check for and explain any o tie Walloing ¶.AluptRUC baselimnhflt ff0 2. HIighbackground or RTtlt 40L 3. Baseline rise at0 SeiipWON/ 4. ESSMOUS S~d D ______eaV k ohCI ______S. Loss of p "S 14AJl s. Peak tailing or WMtg ~ eocAk as~va-;0-0- ¼Lt .~~~~~(,4yaa Rmaneed Acdo( . VO t'j- a~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~enst Pgjc volatiles by GO/MS - CLIP Assessment (inioverall ~~4- bei~s~~ 5 &oC&szz r&-T4 o ereccc&-/ P/&crO 274Cscdt /3 6TkurtŽreo6-/ o Q--r~ay 2~ wr~t t07-cL c.trcvr -%S bvo-) - kzO 744 &y~k~i~ebtc~uP L-)Cyet~& 441 o~X/4t! C~~~~~~~~~~~O6 ar/4ctC er v fto ci#-o- TtLr4IlVM efohc& OA,/~ * rgtvr L4rOOl L( VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - IA Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract: 409884 Case No: EIELSON LabiD: PIM SOG No: 19736 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 19991.5 Sample Vol (ml): 5.0 Client Sample ID: H2001 Dilution Facton 200.0 Date Sample Collectst 07/09/95 Date Extracted: 07/17/95 Method: SW8020 Date Analyzed. 07/17/96 Date Sample Rcvd: 07112196 Units: UGSAL Compound Name Result PQL Benzene 380k 200 Ethylbewizene 950-" 200 Toluene 2700 /"200 m,p-Xylenes 4300-/ 200 o-Xylenes 21 007 200 VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - IA Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract: 409884 Case No: EIELSON LabiD: PIM SDG No: 20521 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 20718.7 Sample Vol (ml): 5.0 Client Sample ID: H2002 Dilution Factor 1.0 Date Sample Collected: 07117195 Date Extracted: 07/28/95 Method: SW8020 Date Analyzed: 07/28/95 Date Sample Rcvd: 07/18/95 Units: UG/L Compound Name IDoo/7e Result PQL Benzene NDt 1.0 EthylbenzeneN 1.0 Toluene ND'- 1.0 m,p-Xylenes ND,.X 1.0 o-Xylenes ND~- 1.0 I 000 13 VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - 1A Lab Name: PACE, INC. contract 409884' Case No: EIELSON LablD: PIM SDG No: 19736 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 19990.? Sample Vol (ml): 5.0 Client Sample ID: H2003 Dilution Factor. 1.0 Date Sample Collected: 07A09195 Date Extracted: 07/18/95 Method: 8W8020 Date Analyzed: 07/18/95 Date Sample Rcvd: 07/12/95 Units: UG/L Compound Name Result PQL Benzene PIh~ ND /1.0 Ethylbenzene N8 I, 1.0 Toluene ND/' 1.0 m~p-Xylenes .o.N- I.1 1.0 o-Xylenes 1.0 aooODl8P VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - IA Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract: 409884 Case No: EIELSON LabID: PIM SDG No: 19736 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 19996.8 Sample Vol (ml): 5.0 Client Sample ID: H2006 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Date Sample Collected: 07/0919 Date Extracted: 07118195 Method:- SW8020 Date Analyzed: 07/18/96 Date Sample Rcvd: 07112/9 Units: UGJL Compound Name Result PQL Benzene KO00~A6 ND-' 1.0 Ethylbenzene NDe" 1.0 Toluene ND #" 1.0 m~p-Xylenes ND--' 1.0 o-Xylenes ND.-- 1.0 1 00 0286 VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - IA Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract, 409884 Case No: EIELSON LabID: PIM SDG No: 19738 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 19739.4 Sample Vol (ml): 5.0 Client Sample ID: H-2007 Dilution Factor 250.0 Date Sample Coll Mete: 07/07/95 Date Exhracted: 07118195 Method: 8W8020 Date Analyzed. 07/18/95 Date Sample Rcvd: 07/10195 Unite: UGAL Compound Name Result PQL Benzene p~cm3c, 3100- 250 Ethyfbenzene 830"-" 250 Toluene 8200o, 5 m,p-Xylenes 6200 250 o-Xylenes 3800 250 I 0oo99 0K51t4- VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - 1A Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract: 409884 Ca"e No: EIELSON LabiD): PIM SDG No: 19736 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 19994.0 Sample Vol (ml): 5.0 Client Sample ID: H2008 Dilution Factor 200.0 Date Sample Collected: 07/09/95 Date Extracted: 07118/95 Method: SW8020 Date Analyzed: 07118/95 Date Sample Rcvd: 07/12/95 Units: UG/L Compound Name Result PQL Benzmne pIorjo% 450 100035 VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - IA Lab Name: PACE. INC. contract 409884 Case NO: EIELSON LabID: PIM SDG No: 19736 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 19738.0 Sample Vol (ml): 5.0 Client Sample ID: 02001 Dilution Factor 1.0 Oatte Sample Collected: 07/07195 Oatte Extracted: 07/18195 Method: SW8020 Oats Analyzed: 07/18a/95 Date Sample Rcvd: 07/10/95 UnitW UG/L Compound Name Result PQIL Benzene tNDv/ 1.0 Ethytbenzene NOD-" 1.0 Toluene ND v/~ 1.0 m,p-Xylenes NOV 1.0 o-Xylenes ND 7 tO 10004 1 VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - 1A Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract 409884 Case No: EBELSON LabiD: PIM SDG No: 19738 Matrix:. Water Pace Sample ID: 19996.6 Sample Vol (ml): 5.0 Client Sample ID: 02002 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Data Sample Collectet 0710995 Date Extracted: 07/18/95 method: SW8020 Date Analyzed: 07/18/98 Date Sample Rcvd: 07112/95 Units: UGJL. Compound Name Result PQL Benzene ~,C'O~< ND, 1.0 Ethylbenzene NDK 1.0 Toluene ND,- 1.0 rn,p-Xylenes NDZ 1.0 o-Xylenos ND ~ 1.0 100 0 44 VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - IA Lab Name: PACE, INC. contract 409884 Case No: ELELSON LabID: PIM SDG No: 19736 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 19737.8 Sample Vol (ml): 5.0 Client Sample ID: T1 00I Dilution Factor 250.0 Date Sample Collected: 07/07h95 Date Extracted: 07/18/95 Method: SW802O Date Analyzed:. 07/18/95 Data Sample Rcvd: 07/10/95 Units: UGAL Compound Name Result PQL Benzene 26001/ ~ 250 Elthylbenrene 1200y 250 Toluene 740250 m,p-Xylenos 6500 7250 o-Xyienes 4100 250 10 00 47 olatiles by GC/MS - CLIP Page atf/o DATA VALIDATION: VOLATILES BY GC/MSN5W-L Project Mame: ,~e/ScU'k Aft Number QoN(CLeveL tE Lab I D:. LO'j I ReportNO: Number and Type o(samples: alol special Instructions: p4dodt6@rit okoŽ I) Holding Times Field Darn f AnaDate sample No. Mauril qPS Preservmtios I=sl an comments E 4 , 7I. 1 - QP______- Ha~~~~oj j t~~ ... /I 1 q5-P T ______F -t)/ 7 5.-19 -C) '7 C7 ?I 1 6 5 -72 - 9 ______ - -~~~~~~~1-171--fS * 9 DF-=/O 70~o -4 - 716 195-726/ 7,/ V 7 .19/f S-______ Nots RecoumcttdAcio C ACnMnMMOtst [D volatiles by GC/MS - CLP Page Of "iI instrument Performance: BromoflucrobflzeflO (BFB) Standard BFS Run OCIMS Fe' VA Damsa kISRawmo Datc ID PaTma*?FgrCcuaidSUbfltbWl?~ s clatiomCne I_____ I _____ lz~ Recommendeda $&k 5 68~~c4 £60 111) Calibration A) Initial Calibration Form VI A preent? i. Calculation Check- Mean AR? (minimum OM~n De~~ŽIra f Date D lReti MSUW hni C~elvo"UadMRAP Agee with Lab Report? "or-Yo4 2. Any Mean RAF c 0.05 ? D/ (if Own then Ibt) mom GOWN Catnfl Cornoound RRP ID Date Commmna A- Rmew- Riwsavmw9Am &y QACwaltus6/ page 3 of /O Volatiles by GC/MS - CLP ;Calibration (Continued) A) Initial Calibration (Continued) 3. Calculation Check - % RSD (MISISUD I MWUCW Oa hWIbUOO. maY - - afor men fRfl caobratOi ~f~ Pemcet Date ID CopudRiD ACC with Lab Reprn? 3m./ 7 e Lt+ 9______ 4. Any % RSD > 30% ? V ~ (if wthen Igo______OCMS camlratias Pelm Compl d DDate RSD Cmet 6) Confinuing Calibation Farm VIIA preant? W/1 1.MAy RRIF c.05t0 Standud Caflefl OCIMS Filname DMs ID corn RRP Page Volatiles by GO/MS - CLP of IlI) Caklibration (Continued) bi aCntimuino Calibraton (Continued) 2. Calculation Check- % 0 (minimum I compound per standard) Standard I Cailbrauioa QGMS Compound % ge~ha~pn Fuename Refl Date ID I I L4 Iename gpSAgreeBwith2LabIReport F I ~ 10? A 89 T4oit?_42t ______ I F ___; __Tet_ 1-7.LJL 3?3.'e 3.Any %wl70 eiVek. 25%?.~~. (If~~r Scott)~ W %wDn 3Renay % 25 _ __ V_ (i Rccommmfd Asa mo R Volailes by GC/MS - CIP Page•L of/) IV)- Blanks '~.Form IVA present 2. Method blank-reported for each matrix, concenfration level. GO/MS system as appropriate? VPi ______If no, espIies: ______3. Any common lab contaminants deeced O (If Yese then Its:) ______Concentration (specify mcai) Blank OCIMS Date Methylene ID I D____ Run Chloride Acetone Tolueeccoaon 4.Other TCLs or flCas eetd I (Wif t then ID ID Ran Cotpound(pc*nit S.Any nkmian detected inFS, TS, or ER sampl~es? Blank Date Metklsh wek(ueef nis Other ID Cafecod Chodie Aceome Tokoea (SpecL Note: DO NOT lit commapSa adju~d to?W baead on mcdatd lab blank constammatm in Soctio IV. S. Recommended Aatla VI Surrocate Recovery 1. Form iI A present All. samples II Entries agree with raw dats?, Xt (Ifena far any answuc aln below.) PO LAX0k I7 C 4 zooZ I Vecvrt 5-- OA CASON .w.1> 6 Voatls y CMS -CLIP Page of / VI Surrogate Recovery (Continued) k. AMnY rufls with oae (1)or more recoveries outside limits? xj (lryet then list:) Sample Surrogate nia!R-u ID %ompounde comments IdnodtaI IhSO~~gc______4 All method blank surrogates with~in limits? WI oR explain belowv) "tjMatix SDikS I Matrix SDiks Duplicates 1. Number of par anlzed: ____ Mfltrcs WSW ____ Frequency:y *+p;I 2. Form Ill A prowen?? F7lZRasufti enties &mu with raw data? 1e % R. RPO Callcullationa OK? f 3. All % R, RIPD within ImI ? A.L (if aVtealat) sample % ID solS C0apon' MSIIMS RFD___ Comments (Voh rire#&K 7 7 anisus~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~QC.O M aN 2% Page 7 of fqIaUef by QCIMS - CLIP Vil) Field Duplicates i. Are originallfield duplicate pairs identiffabletiI (Ifryeso then list:) Ou~g~a! Duplicate Onigis Duplcate Sample Matru sample NO. a sN. Matrix Sample No. 2. Overall frequenclr ______3. Comment (Evaluate RPDS for POSitiv pare anaYWe): $ii)Internal SadrsPerformance 1. Form VillA, pressen flMg AreasJRT age. witt raw data? V- 2. All sample/blank ISamsW witb lib' Listexetn: 3.Al1lsanipbleptw ISRTs whit 30 seondS of standad ISAT? Uist exceptlorm MAlt? 0,Iv~i44A ~j~d qoboftc O/21v-5~ A 6 RevnsQ~cnlUh Pagej....Of/ Volablas by GCIMS - CLP Jz~ ompondIontlicaton nd Q .uantitatlan Sample Compound and Raw:l RT ScttCII*O Qualified Resu: (if diferent) Comments Number Reporte Fort IA) MatchI Match OK ______beo ZIe.~L f ~Vd O- Lfe- cc( e-z>a- W ______heM zt.=-I- V sltfles by GC/MS -CLP Pagej. of2 -(X) Tentatively Identified Compounds 1. Have all peaks VWt should be searched, boon searched and,reported (Form I E)? 2. Any TiCs found insamples also in associated blanks? A/7 3. Are reasorable adnufcatuons reported? ______ 4. Mny TCt. compounds reported asc~TICS?______ XI) System Performance Check for and expl ainsy of fMOwOlfi 1.AbruptRJC baseline shit 4 0 tHigh backgroundWorRTt~dW=o 3. Bsmlhtine 8 at hi1 Uniprflse 4. Extrarwus pedt 5. Loss of peak rembialm ______6. Peak tailing orsilit*1 L) RecommeadSAtctIe ~- f A4aI, OA~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~4111 1 Volatiles by GO/MS -CLP Page/actof xii) Overll sssment,1 jym~awt-rt cte atse1k az.J cct.4.. L4SQ a5 ttpfor-tt4 VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - I A Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract: 409884 Case No: EIELSON LabiD: PIM SDG No: 20521 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 20719.5 Sample Vol (ml): 5.0 Client Sample ID: H12014 Dilution Factor 10.0 Date Samrpte Collected, 07117195 Date Extracted: 07126/95 Method: SW8020 Data Analyzed: 07126/9 Date Sample Rcvd: 07/18195 Units: UG/L Compound Name Result POL Benzene 76'- 10 Ethylbenzene 84 ~ 10 Toluene 29O-~ 10 m.p-Xylenes e40ry; ) 10 o-Xylenes (GOD0 2..0 2SO 10 100020 VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - 1A Lab Name: PACE, INC, Contract: 409884 Case No: EIELSON LabiD: PIM SDG No: 20521 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 2071 9.SDL. Sample Vol (ml): 5.0 Client Sample ID: H2014DL Dilution Factor. 20.0 Date Sample Collected: 07/17195 Date Extracted: 07/28/95 Method: SW8020 Date Analyzed: 07/28195 Date Sample Rcvd: 07/18/95 Units: UG/L Compound Name O0 Result PQL Benzene 87~ 20 Ethylbenzenle 110, 20 Toluene 240> 20 rn~p-Xylenes 6 2 o-Xylenes 2020 100 02 4 VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - IA Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract: 409884 Case No: EIELSON LabiD: PIM SDG No: 20521 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 20720.9 Sample Vol (MI): 5.0 Cllent Sampl, ID: H2015 Dilution Factor 50.0 Data Sample Collected: 07117195 Date Extracted: 07/26/95 Method: SW8020 Date Analyzed: 07/26/95 Date Sample Rcvdt 07/18/95 Units: UG/L Compound Name Result PQL Benzene 380~1 50 Ethylbenzene 30- 50 Toluene ssoZ/ so mn,p-Xylenes 10-'50 o-Xylenes 310 ~ 50 10 003 1 VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET -IA Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract: 409884 Case No: EIELSON LabiD: PIM SDG No: 20521 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 20721.7 Sample Vol (ml): 5.0 Client Sample ID: H2018 Dilution Factor 1.0 Date Sample Collected: 07/17/95 Data Extracted: 07/25/95 Method: SVV802O Date Analyzed: 07/25/95 Date Sample Rcvd: 07/18/95 Units: UGIL Compound Name Result PQIL Benzene~ ~ 7133 -1.0 Ethylbenzene 5.3- 1.0 Toluene NDr 1.0 m,p-Xylenes 27 ~ 1.0 o-Xylenes 8.6w 1.0 100038 VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - I A Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract, 409884 Case No: EIELSON LabID: PIM SOG No: 20521 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 20722.5 Sample Vol (ml): 5.0 Client Sample ID: H42017 Dilution Factor 50.0 Date Sample Collected: 07/17/95 Date Extracted: 07126/95 Method: SW8020 Date Analyzed: 07126/5 Date Sample Rcvd: 07/18/95 Units: UG/L Compound Name e0ooc4 ~ Result PQL Benzene 530O- 50 Ethylbenzene 440 ~ 50 Toluene 2000k 50 m~p-Xylenes 10' 50 o-Xylenes 7 W50 10 0 04 5 VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - 1A Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract: 409884 Case No: EIELSON LablO: PIM SOG No: 20521 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 20521.4 Sample Vol (ml): 5.0 Client Sample ID: H201 8 Diluiuon Factor 1.0 Date Sample Collected: 0711619 Date Extracted: 07/25/95 Method. SW8020 Date Analyzed: 07/25/95 Date Sample Rcvd: 07/18/95 Units: UG/L Compound Name poos2. Result PQL Benzene 8.5- 1.0 Ethylbenzene 1.97- 1.0 Toluene ND r- 1.0 rn,p-Xylenes 44 1.0 o-Xylenes 1.9k 1.0 1 000 5 VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - IA Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract: 409884 Case No: EIELSON LablO: PIM SDG No: 20521 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 20522.2 Sample Vol (ml): 5.0 Client Sample ID: H201 9 Dilution Factor 1.0 Daft Sample Collected: 07116(95 Date Extracted: 07/25/95 Method: SW8020 DataAnalyznt 07/25/95 Date Sample Rcvd: 07/1 8/95 Units: UGA. Compound Name Result POL Benzene~ ~ r32- 1.0 Ethylbenzene ND1.0 Toluene N-'1.0 m,p-Xylenes ND--~ 1.0 o-Xylenes ND ' 1.0 I100059 VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - I A Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract: 409884 Case No: EIELSON LabID: PIM SDG No: 20521 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 20523.0 Sample Vol (ml): 5.0 Client Sample ID: H42020 Dilution Factor: 20.0 Date Sample Collected: 07/16/95 Date Extracted: 07/25/95 Method: SW8020 Date Analyrzed: 07/25/95 Date Sample Rcvd: 07/18/95 Units: UGIL Compound Name p/c06 5- Result PQL Benzene 300 2 Ethylbenzene 347/ 20 Toluene ND '"7 20 m,p-Xyienes 40'20 o-Xylenes 190w 20 N~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - IA Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract: 409884 Case No: EIELSON LabID: PIM SDG No: 20521 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 20524.9 Sample Vol (ml):. 5.0 Client Sample ID: Q0204 Dilution Factor 1.0 .Data Sample Collected: 07/16195 Date Extracted: 07/25/95 Method: 5W8020 Date Analyzed: 07/25/96 Date Sample Rcvd: 07/18/95 Units: UG/L Compound Name p n s- Result PQL Benzene NDr 1.0 Ethyibenzene ND' 1.0 Toluene ND- 1.0 m,p-Xylenes NDX 1.0 o-Xylenes NO~ 1.0 1 0007 1 VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - IA Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract; 409884 Case No: EIELSON LablO: PIM 806 No: 20521 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 20723.3 Sample Vol (ml): 5.0 Client Sample ID: 02,005 Dilution Factor. 1.0 Data Sample Collected: 07/17/95 Date Extracted: 07/25/95 Method: SW8020 Date Analyzed: 07/25/95 Date Sample Rcvd: 07/18/95 Units: UG/1. Compound Name D0 Result PQL Benzene ND 1.0 Ethylbenzerne ND 1.0 Toluene ND 1.0 m,p-Xylenes ND 1.0 o-Xylenes ND 1.0 10 00 7 4 'oatilel by QC/MS a CLIP Page/ 0O DATA VALIDATION: VOLATILES BYGfS CP Project Name: eeID A Number.q9 QC wvtL a , 5Q 4(O -(RepofrtNo:~ Numbarand Type ofSamplus: /ua Special Instructiowl stN 0d LrC~Ce9-p I) Holdino Timem Field Date Anal)* Sample MautN. 7Collected Presmration Dat Commnents H -______~~~~~~~~~I-/f / Recommended Actiowt A/cv-Qatrf Volatiles by GO/MS - CLIP PageZ.2 ofI IIjnstrument Performance: Bromofluorobenzene (BPS) Standard ) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~cb~itemeir SF9 Run OC/MS Finn Omt SipafMas RIs Sacgkpcuad MOMa Date ID Pvuma TmnaaibWd7 flruft? Calculation'lSubntmon? Speofkatmaf?I C4mmnt ecoamseaded Atiau: Ill) Calibration A) initial Calibration Form VI A preSent?- 1. Calculatio Check - Meom FM? (mknimumn oo__o______off __RRa Report' Date toID last Maul ______Sd_ AguewitLab 2. Any Mean RRAP < 0.08 ? (if Ow ______ Compound RIP IMDtt COMMea Re~twmdawohm~h~&ttR///9S OACbnCwaMiOMs ~ volatiles by GC/MS - CiP Page% of/O '11) Calibration (Continued) A) Initial Calibration (Continued) 3. Calculation Check - % ASD (Miralus mioww ulfcibn wemsumutfor manaRWF Date ID COMPOUnd RAree with Lb Report? 4. Any %RSD)> 30% ? ___ (it compound ID Date RSD C=n r~por4~dA~ o4i isa%41?-PR I~y r#H4(~t are aI40 s est~aki "7S " befld o a s)"dff C-abkA1 +- W'~ 8) Continuing Calbaikbn Form VIIA presen?-0 i.IAny RRF cOAS? ______m) Pica ~~~Does ID CmatRRF RewuS ymw~i$A~t1ZLr Al~ QA caP` img7' ~ &9 Volatiles by GC/MS - CLP Page of iiii Calibration (Continued) J Continuing Calibration (Continued 2. Calculation Chedck- % D (Minimum 1 compound per standard) Standard I Calibration GCIAS Filename ed Dt Corn C1 %D AUreeWith Lab Report' 3. Any % 0 > 25% ?(IWhat -4 t vpiE Standard, Caibrataf IbZ Filename Date Compoud % D p ~~Berztsrs.6q RecommeadedAlm ~~~zrs4+ erItea *A t k Ae f R~~w.Sfry iflsw ~~~~QACwmlDS 1 q - <1 41i(1 VolatileS by GC/MS -CLP Page 6- of' IV)Blanks 1. Form IVA presmtLŽ• 2. Method blank reported for each matrix, concentration level, GC/MS system as appropriate?gt9 _ _ _ _ It no, czpl* & ______:__ _ 3.Arty common lab contamninants detected? 110 crya thcn Wtm) ______Concentration Soav units Blank GC/MS Date Meshylene ID ID Rtu Choride Acetone Toluece Z-butanane 4. Other TCUs or TiCs dletectedl? ~O(if w dies Blank 0C9.45 DateCseaao tD 1D Rum CouponSnim S. Aycontainwantst doeteced in FS, T8, or ER sample? ~ Blank Date Methylmee ocs (pciySO d ID Coll adi CO"di Aetes Tl______CU ..restA4Strc qflq'mn/E cce tItj 4hycoArO+&t Vi Surrocgate Recovery 1.Form IIA present? At 2. All. sa~mpe HOWdL.24. Entries agree witi raw data? Y/fr (lofranausuiaaWo) Rewuui 5 /7~~~~~~~~~$4~~5 aVstI4½' iwCQAam hS Pageb Of Volatiles by GC/MS -CLP VI Surrogate Recovery (Continued wt.) 2. Any runs with one (1) or mor recoveries outside limits?0£. (tr y..s then Sample SuopaulnieRu ID Compound % below.) All method blank surrogatol within limits? (If no* explain 'Il)MatixSlkeI MarixScI Duplcates 1. Number of par WAnayt.O&__ matte Will water Frequency: ______ 2. Form III A prent? PAM11iOr__s__data % R. RPD Caiculiatm OK? 3. Ail % R, RPD within Um? (ifaW tkhlbC) -Comments ID ~ sotCaRM* ~ MSIMSD RFD trYV5 A ii % uccleciL~~~~~O 'olatiles by QC/MS - CiP pageg! of v Vii) Field Duplicates 1. Are original/field, duplicate pairs identifiable? N/r. (ifwye. tilea lst:) ofigina Duplicate origina Duplicate Matrix Sample No. Sample No. Mautri_ Sample No. Sample No. 2. Overall frequenr ______3. Comments (Evakuate RPO* for positiv pairdrils) tIll) Internal Standards Performance 1.Form VillApresenti...... Areaa/RT agree with raw d OU? ______ 2. All sampleiblfk ISaers wAt limit? ____ List exceptions: 3.All aampledbfl ISRTe wIlt 30 uecondii of standad ISFIT? List exceptlons: oar~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Fr Re Ku+~ {J4 ['e ot= c*M¶ Q CiW ŽL-$4 d Volatiles by GC/MS - CLP Page3 Of I1(; Compound Identification and Ouantitatlon ______Otc k*if *Y ' Sample compound and Result RT Spectra Calcualation Qualifed Result (if different) Number Reported (Form I A) Match Match OK Comments ~~ QACS.IWI.W~~~hQ ,aiatiies by QC/MS . CIP Page.3of Iu WX Tentatively Identified Compounds 1.Have all peaks tht should be searched, been searched and reported (Form I E)? A,/Q 2- Any TICS found int samples also inassociated blanks? ______ 3. Are reasonable identlflcadon reported? ______ 4. Any TCL compounds, reorte £ TICS? ______ &-a~~v~ Z W6t ;4-tfc4oj )fl""S N-feJVy4-wo Ctror&#tyl V~r rwrvk de X11) Systemn Per forance Check for and explain Snlty ofVimtlo*i i. AbrLptRIC bmsltinshtt 2. HIig background or RY dWlW ______3. Saseilnes rimeait h SWNipris______4. ExtaneOUS p es s______S.Loss of Peao emis _ _ _ _ 6.Peak wailing or ep it g'______ Mtt re~UIrek Raised 0~~~~~~~A PageJtoof lathes by GC/MS - CLP 1- xII) Overall Assessment 4 /a' oor/t ~ e+~ re9Lh -lC~O L(IQ'if K p/Aln A~ 6p 1J .4~~~~piarc!~~~t Clv Ad! 4~~~"6, C~~~~(grit, Q1~~~~~~~~~(~~~~~ QAcUYDWi ReytowS By/DatgA/q< Pagej ct I.. C S~CP 'vbtatl@3 by GC/MS CL? BYG Iti) DATA VALIDATION: VOLATILIES ocIcrn Number Prrnectam: teLtu pR T olof Lm Lab ID~Re ~ooqi7Na Numberant I) Holdiflg limes fla ntic Datant sampl o Mati Colic! o0 q No= )>r~~elwc FolatileS by GC/US - CLAPgt.o (DIFSI Standard jj.. trumenlt Perflormance: BromofluorObenzenb DM po~~w w.Comsat I rOCIMS I fl? u? ss? BFBDate Run I et - I II -~~~~~~~~~C~al A) In b~~~~~~a~~l~~~arb~~~ll~ IIn p-w-c~.izEcs~r - Fom IA pretasatvenhiv Dan FormRRA peset? cl~raOA 1. alulttfiChck Man RPmiimm Volatiles by GO/MS -Page~Offt j.,L Calibration roonti~nued A) Initial CalibrafmL~gfi(otnfusd) a trfos urns RAE CMO(*k % RSO (Mnmm1w iem 3. :Caiculationl PI I Cakbratiofl OCIMS witCorLab RRID Date thenSmtc 4. %YRSD230% ? ID ~ Date RSD JCa6"nua MckcY Ietwr4 . 9') Coitinuing Cal~bratio Form VIIA presen??4/ bm 1.An RPFO.?a cafnfl OCRA Studatt capn 1 F~~~n ~~DMs TO Page L of - oltllby GC/MS - CLP mi -jilibratlon i~contitueqdi 9a comtinuiflOCaib~rstloni(or* standard) (MinimUmn 1 c-ompound per 2. Cateulafiom CheCk % ID IDMth Lab Rpw ID Cam 4t Stneame 'Ref.I Date -4.&IwLe-t 3. Any % 0> 25% ? chaWtS coc&ta 14e ±~e, recove(/ 4 4#ea cbcBM,44Kj Recommend~ -it ?avrez~y I1 Dcg @-t '4065.cs T)-%c 4 & 0#1eg~4~ /3 X%~ LWert O.pCat-F t+ h-(recovenei 'as&btczotlit Mytx tecoijlese doc T"eI 4trfca~poot#''kaot I le-lrekta+S iY&- ck~oec~ed. Page&31?O Volatiles by GC/MS CL? onlvlfGpN-stma pporae 1. Form IVA Present#Kt concentradolteeG/Msytmaaprrat..4 2.Meod blank reported for each matrix, if no.~ explaw~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f hclM if teUS .AnCommon lab contamirant ts detectd? Dane bleutanon Bltk aC/MS n ouhI2btnn * ID ID ~~Run Clrd r a5c 4.Oter TcLsorTCd$Wden a ID Rua oAE S. An contemants de tectd 1InIE te Blank DaTMn~S eA oe ID C~U a~ IV. S. a nS~tlbbakctuat cu ott:DOlt copaS NT SlaS tWebult VA Surrcoates ReCOVery O~~N _____Allsamplesmd.~4I- -- . Form II A an ammw epalan below.) ... (IaVf wny Entries agrne wiO raw data? 3049 O~iwm o Volatilo by GC/MS - C I)Pge r gurroaltOAeCOVON tidconit$i(itnusethnalst: usd lmtAl""y atl 2. Anty runs wi't One (1)Or more rec~fros s ,1081Re-Run Sample - Comumes SampleSurRat~~~ limits? Ve5(Ifonr CxplaiWbelow) All metiod blank surogates withint Nocke r-QgyireJ. 4 MPMtix Spike IMatrix Spike Duoilc-1tfl I___ 1. Number Of Pairs anabed ____ Frequefoy(W/l enis! agree with raw dame? _ __ 2.A pres~tResulsFomi II % R, RPO Calckulfm OK'? (IPw m Sc) 3. All % R. AO wifth ftmb? Sample lii~~ n ID15RS U~~zre~tj -o \v~iaUts bry GCIMS - CIPP)e If Oyu then 1st) 1.Are original/field dluplicate PaftirIdentififlblt..$ZL a sN. h o matrix Sam ~eN)ssariMu 2. Overal *euflcr/ pafd #ilW4M: 3. COnwflf (EvakIsW FMO for posifi i.Form VIllA Present Areas/RT agres widi raw date? 2.All saniPleblW* ISWOSS veU1 m" LUst Nms of sgufdrd ISFIT? 3.All samphiblin ISwr8eod List aspm u~~~~rd.~~tw OA r ~ Pagej o Void"'s by GO/MS a -CL and Oa'iaif I) omoounld IdentitficAfi,01 ualified Result (if difrent) chie 'Clcuif L.~~~~anCommenDs i I) o0~ ~ ad O5 I Ier&-(41A--MC~~V ~ ~ ~~~~~~I PagejL of Voiatlfl by GC/MS - CLI (X)Tetaivly detiie cmpounds and reported (Form I E)? 1. Hane all tiat should be searched. been searched blanks? ______2. Anly 1101 found hin samples also inmsociatad 3. Are reasonable idUEWHSOI¶5 rePortd ye;~ 4. Any TC. compounds, reome aslieTIW______ XI) System Perflornai~ Check for and explain any of toe kfotkg 1. Abrupt RIC baseline shift WC______2. High background or RT shift M/O 3. Baselhe rISe t hmtVWtpwII MM.t 4. Extraneous pet Mwo 5. Loss of peak rookom d'O 6. Peak telling or Wp~S MO = Lj~~~~ ~OA Cmmiith COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report 'Client: IT Corporation Service Request:, A9500477 Project: Eielson AFB/409884 Date Collected: 7/1 8/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/20/95 Aromatic Volatile Organics Sample Name: P4004 Units: ugfL (ppb) Lab Code: A9500477-1 Basis: NA Test Notes: GC Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Remilt Notes Benzene 5030 602 0.5 0.2 1 NA 7121195 ND,, Toluene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 ND' Chlorobenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 ND" Ethylbenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 37l Xylenes, Total 5030 602 1 0.4 1 NA 7/21/95 ND" 1,3 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 ND' )14DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 ND/ 1,2 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 ND / GC Performed second columan or GC/MS confirmation. Approved By: K { L v &Date: OOA77HCHlSI-T.9f)XW95 PW No COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Client: Cr Corporation Service Request A9500477 Project: Eieison AFB/409884 Date Collected: 7/18/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/20/95 Aromatic Volatile Organics Sample Name: P4005 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: A9500477-2 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Benzene 5030 602 0.5 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 7.8. Toluene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 2 Chlorobenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 ND/ Ethylbenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 2A Xylenes, Total 5030 602 1 0.4 1 NA 7/21/95 to - ,1,3 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 ND.- ~'I,4 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 ND 1,2 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 ND~ Approved By: f ( tcr).n Date: 00477HC HSI -RME (2) W95 COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Client: Fr Corporation Service Request: A9500477 Project: Eielson AFB/409884 Date Collected: 7/18/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/20/95 Aromatic Volatile Organics Sample Name: P4006 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: A9500477-3 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysts Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Remilt Notes Benzene 5030 602 0.5 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 ND,/ Toluene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 ND,/ Chlorobenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 ND/' Ethylberizene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 ND/ Xylenes, Total 5030 602 1 0.4 1 NA 7/21/95 NQ/- 1I 3DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 ND It14 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 ND 1,2 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 ND/ Approved By: f W t 2 " rDate: IS2=/42895 00477PRC HSI .flflX (3) S/F9 PatN 5 COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report 'Client: IT Corporation Service Reqluest: A9500477 Project: Eielson AFB/409884 Date Collected: 7/18/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/20/95 Aromatic Volatile Organics Sample Name: P4008 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: A95004774 Basis: NA Test Notes: GC Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRtL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Benzene 5030 602 0.5 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 NDr- Toluene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 NDC- Chlorobenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 NDV~ Ethylbenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 ND~ Xylencs, Total 5030 602 1 0.4 1 NA 7/21/95 4~ 11,3 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 ND,6 1,4 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 NDX 1,2 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 ND/ GC Performed second column or GC/MS confirmation. Approved By:i ~- % Date:/09 I 522042895 D0477PHC HSI. - TEX (4)1/1095 Q9 COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Client: IT Corporation Service Request: A9500477 Project: Eielson AFB1409884 Date Collected: 7/18/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/20/95 Aromatic Volatile Organics Sample Name: P4007 Units: ug'L (ppb) Lab Code: A9500477-5 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Resuit Notes Benzene 5030 602 0.5 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 NDl Toluene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 NDI7 Ethylbenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 ND"' Ethylbenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 ND/ Xylenes, Total 5030 602 1 0.4 1 NA 7/21/95 ND71 1,3 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 ND/ ~4DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 ND/ 1,2 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 NDt Approved By: .14<~Olstj owz. Date: IS272/04785 OO77PHCMHSI.B-MX(5)MI~5 Q47 COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Client: 1T Corporation Service Request: A9500477 Project: Eielson AFB/409884 Date Collected: 7/1 8/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/20/95 Aromatic Volatile Organics Sample Name: P4009 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: A9500477-6 Basis: NA Test Notes: GIC Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Benzene 5030 602 0.5 0.2 10 NA 7/26/95 250 Toluene 5030 602 1 0.2 10 NA 7/26/95 1100 r - Chlorobenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 ND Ethylbenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 ND"" Xylenes, Total 5030 .602 1 0.4 100 NA 7/26/95 5100- 1,3 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 Mn 1,4 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 N" 1,2 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 ND (IC Performed second column or GIC/MS confirmation. Approved By: 4 t-Date: i, 9 1S2V0239 OOA77PHCHSI . ITrEX (6) 8/1W5'i COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Client: ITCorporation Service Request A9500477 Project: Ejelson AFB/409884 Date Collected: 7/1 8/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/20/95 Aromatic Volatile Organics Sample Name: P4011 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: A9500477-7 Basis: NA Test Notes: GC Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MiRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Remilt Notes Benzene 5030 602 0.5 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 NDC' Toluene 5030 602 I 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 NDe'- Chlorobenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 NDt~ Ethylbenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 e Xylenes, Total 5030 602 1 0.4 1 NA 7/21/95 36/ 1,3 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 ND/ ., DCH 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 NDX 1,2 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 ND CC Perforned second column or GCUMS confirmation. Approved By: ( "O'QL'C'7 e Datm: a 0AV- 00477p1C HSI1- BTlX (1)WSW95 FP M COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report CJlient: if Corporation Service Request: A9500477 Project: Eielson AFB/409884 Date Collected: 7/1 8/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/20/95 Aromatic Volatile Organics Sample Name: Trip Blank Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: A9500477-8 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRL MI)L Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Benzene 5030 602 0.5 0.2 1 NA 7121/95 N, Toluene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 ND. Chlorobenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 MA 7/21/95 ND - Ethylbenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 MA 7/21/95 ND0 Xyienes, Total 5030 602 1 0.4 1 NA 7/21/95 ND 1I3DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 MA 7/21/95 NDY' t4DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 NDC' 1,2 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/21/95 ND/ Approved By: Date: 9 00477WRC HSI -BTEX (8) &1/5 COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report jilent 1T Corporation Service Request: A9500452 Project: Eielson AFB/409884 Date Collected: 7/16/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/17/95 Aromatic Volatile Organics Sample Name: H2021 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: A9500452-1 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRlL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Benzene 5030 602 0.5 0.2 1 NA 7/17/95 ND Toluene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/1 7/95 ND Chlorobenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/17/95 ND Ethylbenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/1 7/95 ND Xylenes, Total 5030 602 1 0.4 1 NA 7/17/95 ND 1,3 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 MA 7/17/95 ND 44D C B 5 0 030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/17/95 ND 1,2 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/17/95 ND Approved By: ______Daft: OOASPHC.HSI - =71f fl95 Par 0 0 7 COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report dent: ITCorporation Service Request: A9500452 Project: Eielson AFB/4098S4 Date Collected: 7/16/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/17/95 Aromatic Volatile Organics Sample Name: Q2003 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: A9500452-2 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Anallyte Method Method MRlL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Benzene 5030 602 0.5 0.2 1 NA 7/17/95 ND LA-I Toluene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/17/95 ND Chlorobenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/17/95 N4D Ethylbenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/17/95 ND Xylenes, Total 5030 602 1 0.4 1 NA 7/17/95 NDl 1,3 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/17/95 NDl DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/17/95 ND i,2 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 I NA 7/17/95 ND Approved By: rv k-a ae .A2b 5uI....008 1522/42995 00452PHC HSI BfhX(27/2S/95 Pp No.. Pae o vbilatiteS by GC/MS - CI! DATA VALIDATION: VOLATILES BY GCIMS15) ProtectName:~ /$c ItP• umber.0 ' Lab ID~F~t'~>gean~o 2$NumtberandTyWo(sBUPlew Speclisnuc MASo d (&)29-O 1) Holding Times Dan Field a Coumenli Sampic No. MaScollet rcut I ~~~~~~ 712 lr - -~~72-5~ - 26 qI - - -~~~~~~~~~~~7z Nom Recommeltt Aio r-'e C~~~~(i~~~~~~ L, W/ Rrvw~~skt~~sJU a QA C Y ~ ae o jolatesS by GC/MS - CLP- III trumenlt performanfce: BromofIuorObnenb(P)Sadr F,7cakuarors uutm w tnbd ,/Date- ptnzi As ~~~~~~~~~~~~~L~tMt4 A) Init~ial Caibrati~l Form VI A pressr? 4 Mean FM m u copon Patra 1. Calculatonl Chuck- Selcuted ith Lab RepotO CaffraUf OCM Cam~ AUP w Date ID IL Mafl flSU sua 2.AyMean RRF cOOS05? meam 0B ubf COM ~RRp I Daze S OA cONaMiMtMa v~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~e Page3 of VOIWastS' y SC/MS CO! ii, Calibraton bConti1ny8d A) inital Calibration (Cotinued) Check- Vs RSO P 3. Calculation p IAgeen ICapibratiofl Oc/ms Lab Report Date ID I COUAVOefwith ellIWC 4.AIIY %RSIDO30'I ? ML I 9) ContinuingO CWaliraio Form VIA presentd4 1.AnyRRF CO.05t7 kl~ OA Su~mda ite= Cpm PD-a- ~ D p~~~OQ~ Page of foiatlSS by GCIMS eCIP -B)CbrtilanifOCanirtWI (Cntiue compound Per stadard) 2. Calculation Check, % D (minimum 1 CompoundOCIS SD whi~ standard I' Fouttnam Re Date IDd rre 3. Amy % 0 25% ? X . aboa Standard S PIueSa DateCa af4 1,c eO --P~ 4-v At-00'e-~ 44 C q~~oui'd C a;q ~4kkd b+2- CCAc iahhf rtccvery eql~rv~a66IM,6 ULA j -yo & ,-c 13 S a~~~Acm~m~ Page, ofq VolatilOS by GO/MS - CI,' 1. Form NVA presnt?.7 etL..2 approprlateA4 concenrtation level, GC/MS system as 2. Method blank reported for each matr1x, if no, Capl~w detected Q1j (Iu hnLm 3. Any common tab contarnfinant CancmntrattIO S _Ufli Mthla BINk CM Dane Ataon Toluene 2.bumcnne IID DRnClfd dfftctWNO iU hn15 4 . Other TCLs o TCS Blank OC/S O. IDID Run ~m I wi S.AnconteainAM lenS hF ThorE tilMS$Sth rBlank Vi Surrogate Recover All samples it 1.Form II A present A/ (If.....(Wi firnsay smt blow.) Entee agree whtU raw data? o Volatilel by GCIMS - CLPPae r urrooatO RecovON (Continlue thent)KiS outside limfl½2.... (1if 2. Mny runs wftt o" (1) or more rscovfrles* Re------SampleSur------a ao explini below.) wfttif limits? Vj(If All method blank surrogates gko's-z rcgf lr-edr Matr SDIkS Matix SpikeO DulCmtes of Par anlytS&__ i. Number solwallor___ Mattoc 2- ______Frequency:f raw data? _ __ P.~RsulS iW'a agr with 2. Formi III A present ± 1 % R, tPO CaiculatOMS OKfl4 L. (I fI=t) 3. All % R. RPO within ti? eOf Sample~~~~~~~SrzA V3 ~W5 tert- azccC abLt. 13~~~~Xy/------% a- oga,:a . o Vcnitlf by GC/MS - CL?'Pg7 identifialble? b/fr (if yu* then UPt:) i. Are original/field duPlicats Pairs ~aDu MatriX Dug 2. Overall frequenor POW paired analyte): 3. Commefl (EVaLua viii ineral StandardS Peroman" 1. Form VIllA present? Areas/RT? agree wIih raw daft? XA 2. All sample/bWrk ISaras*1M scdSof swundrd ISRiT 3.All sampbJl Ba YAM* 30 I&~YT00 ed Acda /ass OCSY a~s Pagef.oft Volatles by GO/MS - CI! anduatitIf I) onioufld tdentiflCgitiof (if difrent) th 'acIUQaiidResult sampi' CO ------ReutM I A MthI Numbo R edPOrM UK 3- ,-I -)+-~ pc- Ct 0e A~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~vxe "",PeS I eO '-V C~~~~~ Page..L Of volitUWs by GC/MS -CLP (XITetaivly detiie cmpounds reported (Form I E)? 1. peksaveal fl shuldbeserched, been searched and 2. Any TICs found hi sample also hin associated blanks? 47 3. Are reaaofblab Id ~entlftOfS reported? %e5 TICS? AN______4. AnY TC. comXounds reported - XI) System PerformanCe Check for and ePaiMNVmy taIm t owing 1. Abrup RIC baseline shilt ______2. High backgrOUfdforRT sf 3. Baseline rise St flitsiiiflW t & i-ir ou~k 4. ExnIWOUSPSSlif ~Q ~-~ S.Losb of pea Mkm=bO~ 8. Peak tailing or IP10 N fED~lflhhui L?sJe. r-evur'eA jcamsf Rr1k3 COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report P2lient: 1T Corporation Service Request: A9500483 Project: Eielson AFB/409884 Date Collected: 7/19/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/21/95 Aromatic Volatile Organics Sample Name: P4002 Units: ugH.. (ppb) Lab Code: A9500483-1 Basis: NA Test Notes: GC( Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date .Result Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Benzene 5030 602 0.5 0.2 100 NA 7/26/95 1500"~' Toluene 5030 602 I 0.2 100 NA 7/26/95 5 500t?"~ Chlorobenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/2,4/95 ND - 721 Ethylberizene 5030 602 I 0.2 10 NA 7/26/95 590--r P '4 Xylenes, Total 5030 602 1 0.4 1 NA 7/26/95 6800 ?~ 1,3 D(C8 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/24/95 ND - ~C4 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/2-4/95 NO 1,2 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/24/95 ND (TC performed second column or GC/M confirmation. Approved By: / U t Vft'Date: 'q OOS3HC HSI .PWX &/IW95 pag N. COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report bf'ient: IT Corporation Service Request: A95004&3 Project: Eielson AFB/409884 Date Collected: 7/19/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/21/95 Aromatic Volatile Organics Sample Name: P4001 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: A9500483-2 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Remilt Notes Benzene 5030 602 0.5 0.2 1 NA 7t26/95 ND~- Toluene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/26/95 ND ~ Chlorobenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/26/95 ND- Ethylbenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/26/95 NDr Xylenes, Total 5030 602 1 0.4 1 NA 7/26/95 ND1 1,3 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/26/95 ND~ )4DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/26195 ND 1,2 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 MA 7/26/95 NDX Approved By: Date: OOASPWC14S1* TX (2)&Wf5 Pqe N. COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Client: ITCorporation Service Request: A9500483 Project: Eieison AFB/409884 Date Collected: 7/19/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/21/95 Aromatic Volat~ile Organics Sample Name: P4003 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: A9500483-3 Basis: NA Test Notes: GC Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRtt MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Benzene 5030 602 0.5 0.2 1 NA 7/24/95 ND-~ Toluene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/24/95 ND -' Chlorobenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 MA 7/24/95 ND- Ethylbenzene 5030 602 1 0.4 1 NA 7/24/95 ND-~ Xylenes, Total 5030 602 1 0.4 1 NA 7/24/95 ' 1,3 DCB; 5030 602 1 0.2 1 MA 7/24/95 ND.- 1,4 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/24/95 NDr 1,2 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/24/95 NDX GIC Performned second column or GCCMS confirmation. Approved By: -i'G cktUDate: C 008P11CH145.fX (3)8/10/5 PageN. COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report lient. ITCorporation Service Request: A9500483 Project: Ejelson AFB/409884 Date Collected: 7/19/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/21/95 Aromatic Volatile Organics Sample Name: P40 10 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: A9500483-4 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Benzene 5030 602 0.5 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 NDU- Toluene 5030 602 I 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 ND," -Chlorobernzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 ND, Ethylbenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 ND Xylenes, Total 5030 602 1 0,4 1 NA 7/25/95 Nl)r 1,3 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 NDZ 34 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 ND.- 1,2 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 ND Approved By: ______Date: ______ 1S=h04219 WQV4SJPCHISI -BTEX(4)SdI/5 PageN. COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report 'Client: IT Corporation Service Request: A9500483 Project: Eielson AFB/409884 Date Collected: 7/19/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/21/95 Aromatic Volatile Organics Sample Name: P4010MS Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: A9500483-5 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Benzene 5030 602 0.5 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 NDelr Toluene 5030 602 1 0.2 I NA 7/25/95 ND - Chlorobenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 N11 Ethylbenzene 5030 602 I 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 ND~ Xylenes, Total 5030 602 1 0.4 1 NA 7/25/95 ND 1,3 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 ND'~ t 4 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 ND) 1,2 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 ND pVZ Approved By: f.{ C ~ eDate:-_ _ __ _ 1S2V/042995 QOAS3PHCHSI -9MX (5)st95 PageNo 7 COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report S'lient: ITCroainService Request: A9500483 Project: Ejelson AFB/409884 Date Collectedt 7/19/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/21/95 Aromatic Volatile Organics Sample Name: P40OIMSD Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: A95oo483-6 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRLL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Benzene 5030 602 0.5 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 NDr- Toluene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 NDm Chlorobenzene 5030 602 I 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 ND, Ethylbenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 ND, Xylenes, Total 5030 602 1 0.4 1 NA 7/25/95 ND- 1,3 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7125/95 ND~ N~4DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 ND I,2 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 ND Approved By: ______Date: a IS22JO42S5 00483PHC HSI .FlEX (6)Biw Qaeif COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Client:. IT Corporation Service Request: A9500483 Project: Eielson AFB/409884 Date Collected: 7/19/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/21/95 Aromatic Volatile Orgamcs Sample Name: P40 12 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: A9500483-7 Basis: NA Test Notes: OC Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Benzene 5030 602 0.5 0.2 10 NA 7/26/95 35(r p Toluene 5030 602 1 0.2 10 NA 7/26/95 41 0 V' Chlorobenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 ND- Ethylbenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 6 ~' P V7 Xylenes, Total 5030 602 1 0.4 10 NA 7/26/95 1600 p;~7 1,3 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7125/95 ND- P1T7 A,4 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 ND- 1,2 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7125/95 ND- ~ GC Performied second column or GTC/MS confirmnation. Approved By: f o~ t C~t Date: 0 'v OO4S3PHCHSI. ŽTEX (1) &tLW9 PWgNo COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report b-lient: ITCorporation Service Request: A9500483 Project: Eielson AFB/409884 Date Collected: 7/19/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/21/95 Aromatic Volatile Orgae Sample Name: P4016 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: A9500483-~8 Basis: NA Test Notes: CI Prep Analysis Dilouto Date Date Remilt Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Benzene 5030 602 0.5 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 52.5r Toluene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 14 -- Chlorobenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 ND~- Ethiylbenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25195 I Xylenes, Total 5030 602 1 0.4 1 NA 7/25/95 72- 1,3 DCH 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 NDl' 4DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 N~lS9!I4 r 1,2 DCB 5030 602 I 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 NI) CI unsuflicient sample provided for GCMS confirnuation. EPA Method 602 gave a result of 1 ppb for I1,4-DCB. Based on project data and previous GCMS confirmations it is the opinion of GAS that I1,4-DCB is nan-detected. Approved By: ~ T JDate: ?-O 9h. IS2V/042895 OO483PHCHSI! ffRThX(R)&1w5 PW;No 1 COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Ilent: ITCorporation Service Request: A9500483 Project: Eielson AFB/409884 Date Collected: 7/19/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/21/95 Aromatic Volatile Organics Sample Name: P4018 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: A9500483-9 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysis D'ilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Benzene 5030 602 0.5 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 35.6.-~ Toluene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 30~ Chlorobenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 ND- Ethylbeiizene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 4 - Xyienes, Total 5030 602 1 0.4 1 NA 7/25/95 41- 1,3 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 ND OJCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 ND 1,2 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 ND 1pproved By: ______Date: 1522(04"s9 OO4S3PHCHSI -BME (9) &'V5 Pag No.1 COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report ibient: ITCorporation Service Request: A9500483 Project: Ejelson AFB/409884 Date Collected: 7119/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/21/95 Aromatic Volatile Orpancs Sample Name: P40 17 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: A9500483-10 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRLi MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Benzene 5030 602 0.5 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 12.2- Toluene 5030 602 1 0.2 I NA 7/25/95 5~- Chlorobenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 ND- Ethylbenzene 5030 602 1 0 2 1 NA 7/25/95 3 Xylenes, Total 5030 602 1 0.4 1 MA 7/25/95 51 1,3 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 ND,- l),4 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 ND 1,2 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 ND ptq Approved By: { fr - A Date: IS22V042895 00433HCfHSI -BThX(LO)54MS P. 12 COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, [NC. Analytical Report Client: IT Corporation Service Request: A9500483 Project: Eieison AFB/409884 Date Collected: 7/19/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/21/95 Aromatic Volatile Organics Sample Name: P4013 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: A9500483-11I Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Remilt Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Exrtracted Analyzed Result Notes Benzene 5030 602 0.5 0.2 1 NA 7/25195 12.4 Toluene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 - Chlorbenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 ND- Ethylbenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 3 . Xylenes, Total 5030 602 I 0.4 1 NA 7/25/95 51- 1,3 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 ND)-' DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 ND~ 1,2 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 ND-- Approved By: Z ~ t m Date: e q lSflJ042S95 0O4S3PHC HS2. MEXJMSfl Pag No "rl 1 3 COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Akent: IT Corporation Service Request: A9500483 Project: Eielson AFB/409884 Date Collected: 7/1 9/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/21/95 Aromatic Volatile Organics Sample Name: P401 5 Untijs: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: A9500483-12 Basis: NA Test Notes: (IC Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Benzen~e 5030 602 0.5 0.2 1 NA 7125/95 15.6c- Toluene 5030 602 I 0.2 I NA 7/25/95 ND - Chlorobenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 NDl - Ethylbenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 I NA 7/25/95 ND~-" Xylenes, Total 5030 602 1 0.4 1 NA 7/25/95 29~ 1,3 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 ND-~ 34 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 ND~ i(2 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 ND GC Performed second column or (CICMS confirnation. Approved By: *4/t.0l&Date: 1522V04M59 00483PHC 152.- TEX (2)8/MOM95 RW 0 1 4 COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Ilient: IT Corporation Service Request: A9500483 Project: Eielson AFB/409884 Date Collected: 7/19/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/21/95 Aromatic Volatile Organics Sample Name: Q4003 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: A9500483-13 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Benzene 5030 602 0.5 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 ND""' Toluene 5030 602 1 0 2 1 NA 7/25/95 ND-"" Chlorbenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25195 ND ~ Ethylbenzene 5030 602 1 0 2 1 NA 7/25/95 ND .- Xylenes, Total 5030 602 1 0.4 1 NA 7/25/95 NDl r 1,3 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 725/95 NDJ,.- 14DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 ND' 1,2 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 NI) P7 2 Approved By: ______Date: ~ 5~ 1SZ=/42395 ~1 OO4*PHC HSI2. BTEX (3)fl/9 Pap No COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report J'ient: IT Corporation Service Request: A9500483 Project: Eielson AFB/409884 Date Collected: 7/19/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/21/95 Aromatic Volatile Ora0 Sample Name: P4014 Units: ugniL (ppb) Lab Code: A9500483-14 Basis: NA Test Notes: GIC Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Benzene 5030 602 0.5 0.2 10 NA 7/26/95 17 t 9 Toluene 0 5030 602 1 0.2 10 NA 7/26/95 330-t92 ' Chilorobenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7125/95 ND - p 79 Ethylbenzene 5030 602 1 0.4 10 NA 7/26/95 160 P Xylenes, Total 5030 602 1 0.2 10 NA 7/26/95 840 -IS t 1,3 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 I NA 7/26/95 ND~r p7 y 14DB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/25/95 Nfl* 1,2 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2. 1 NA 7/25/95 ND) GC Performed second column or GIC/MS confirmattion. Approved By: ______-___Date: S (0 15 O483PHCH32 BTEX(4)&WIO/3M~ PageJ ofq Volanles by GC/MS -CLP' GCtMt1lt) OATA VALIDATION: VOLATILES BY Number t09us o2gc Levl:TV Protect Nam ~e:,A c AF-/ oampiwc /ta A Labt•Ra~ ID: 4~vNtNumekatrsdypos 1i Holding Timem FieldDan-Cmet O ( *Z7/7L/9 -I-> *CCC1 "I 12C Nows Rccommitd~~dACIIOUO Page Z- ofl 0e by GC/Ms - CLP BS Sadr 'IL) rurneft Perforffnlaf: SromOfIucrobanzenb Mmm r.:i 2 swr atUMSu'a=jaRaw :BFDat61 c 'I GID. k,4cmdk r:v/& I n~ I aid e d -rtO-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ L~rcd pv~ett - -~~~~v5Lvid4-I -u t 4uwt tla/e Fom%>JrtdlettprONfkC I e ata iii Calibration am Fff(mknmIcmcn WaNWrammf AC Intalr Awith Lb Repon? 131333 CMMM RRP DateID R*LM*Ub 1 V-- rC-Cd u rcdi,ITc o$~.m tc/oweka~- 2.Any MewRRIFCO .OG NOSa~A/ COM~ud RRF ID DMe Page 3of~ Vola*5$by GC/MS - CI!P III ~Calibr~ation icontinuqi A) Initial Calibration COtnutfud - utr uRnn Mismaus I WMpouS py cofbmuo may -Wm 3. Calculation Chick -%RSD QCiMsPeen ICa~lbration AI UM bhLab Repot? Date ~ID I CON ~fd thIfean ______4AflyRSD >30%? ) 1Continuino Cal~trlof Form VU1AWpreset? I. Any ARR? c 0.05 (I dalb) -- q RainS 7 O~ACO~fIfltt IolatleS by GO/MS - CI)Pge4...o it1) -,Ilb-ratiolContL0n*usd co=mpound per stadard) 2. Calculation Chsad'- % 0 (Minimum' %ID with Lab Report' Faeleame I~f Date .Any % D> 5? 4iuw~eamtM w~,4~ceK0 Daze ec~Cefot uoerC, W1AJA. rexcvu'eReJ1 bL(- ac ptalibcAc&I-h '4~J-PCi3 Fs/4t)t 1~Vplr ,V-e -v~~~3nLLr- 0 £w~ 1W-*5'wpL RVMalmst AFV4SC~ VolatlesS by GO/MS C.0Pae1,o i%,i stankS 1. Form IV A prei level, GO/MS systemn as appropriate?jf 2.Method blank reported freach' matrix, concmntration If no, explaiw If "OtbenIWt: 3. An common lab contaminantsf detected? -NC N~tif Blank GCCMS Dlate etobse 22.butanone ID ~ID Ruone ulwacalis 4. Oflur TCLs or Me~ debilcbWd C alawm Blank DamS DC ID ID Cama smpbSistadl ± 1. Form II A present? mlt faWan y armw .zPla belw-) Entries agree will r3w dam? Ž..(Ufs OCSZ7Z& • t4 a~nt <9 OA~~~~~~~~~~rs ag Volatiles by ac/MS - CI? y puroatS RCOVfY continued then thy) ~~W~otn iis L(f7 2. Arty ruswitt orfl (1)Or mmr ReRu CommentsS Sample (if -*c exli blw. within limits? 4yes All method blank surrogatesS I Mmatix d ucl~ - * Matrix Soike par anabt _____ 1. Number of ____r_ Woill wat MartEFrequwafl. data? Remitp~uta stie agre with raw 2. Formi Ill A .Al% R, RPOCSChU lft RPDwifli knit? ~Cnu Sample SR1 PAS/MSD CommOA ID Cm ge tS vwtWos by GC4MS-Ip (Itym*0then IsE) 1. Are ognrallfolId duplicate Par id~nttfiflblOL...&Lt Mint SamSa No -- 7m 2. Overall *rsquwcflC if Paired analys): 3.CommII-tI (EVujulte FMO for Pousen 'I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Aue&WahR gml with rawdS'? 2. Al MIsmI~ibl* IS -M w"l m5 List exptionylS~ - of tandard ISRT? 3.All samPWibf ISRT a" 3o secondo ust~~~~~~~~t gao?4 s O Volaflir by GC /MS -Cl-LP and Cattto 12~~omound identfication Check if I ua eaCICtR esult(ifdiffdrent) Ruutt RT ~~~Comonz SampleCompfl' icand 6 ad Match Ms -Wk VOL -- T~ - -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~4 -d - -~~~~~~~0'-m ae o Voijatis by BC/MS - CL? and. reported (Form I E)? 1. aveaMeak ttt Soul besearched, beenl searched blanks? if/fr 2. Any TiCs found iniamp~sS also inassociated 5~~~~~~4 XI) System Performfanio Check for and e*MlaiFanyof l fllwing 1.AbruptRIC baaetmeahit 3/0 2tHighbwagundor RT hft g 3. BmaselineSfitlthnipflfl g 4. EXflneOUS peds Mv 5. Losso ot: esubiom 0/ 6. Peak tailing or* Mfig KIOj COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Lljent: IT~~rCorporation Service Request: A9500485 Project: Ejelson AFB/409884 Date Collected: 7/20/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/22/95 Aromatic Volatile Organics Sample Name: P4019 Unitsr ug/L (pprb) Lab Code: A9500485-1 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysts Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Benzene 5030 602 0.5 0.2 1 NA 7/24/95 ND- Toluene 5030 602 I 0.2 1 NA 7/24/95 I - Chlorobenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/24/95 ND- Ethylbenzene 5030 602 1 2 1 NA 7/24/95 ND- Xylenes, Total 5030 602 1 0.4 1 NA 7/24/95 ND~- 1,3 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/24/95 ND,- T,"DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/24/95 ND- 1,2 DCH 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/24/95 NDr AprvdBy: IS22M'4MS9 OM4PHC H1451 /9 PQ: COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Client: IT corporation Service Request: A9500485 Project: Eielson AFB/409884 Date Collected: 7/20/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/22195 Aromatic Volatile Organics Sample Name: TRIP S3LANK1 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: A9500485-2 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Remilt Notes Benzene 5030 602 0.5 0.2 1 MA 7/24/95 ND~- Toluene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 MA 7/24/95 ND,- - Chorobenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/24/95 ND,- Ethylbenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/24/95 ND r' Xylenes, Total 5030 602 1 0.4 1 NA 7/24/95 ND,' 1,3 DCB 5030 602 I 0.2 1 NA 7/24/95 NDrA' ,4 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 NA 7/24/95 NDC 1,2 DCB 5030 602 I 0.2 1 NA 7/24/95 NDV Approved By: ______Date: I 9 1572M/42395 O04S5PHCHSI .flfl (2) WIN39 Pag No 0 Page f.0 votastfle by BC/MS - CLP DATA VALIDATION: VOLATILES BY GCJM/ bP Q Lve(rr projectNatUC: Lelsol fvP-g- Number- og93 and Ty of Sampiwm IAav Lab IDMA~oVo -ROeatm NO: NHute Special Ins ------~ 1I Holding Times Aa alWm~stmM FieldI 1%-)Ib 91! K- f4Zevtt I I 4 r~~~~~~~1119s- Nows .Recommendtd Actio NAoi&- re~v¾fJ- Rc.S tat9 CA Ca.UIS~~~~~hW iIL Page.. of folatiI63 by GCIMS . CLP- jj, itru gntPrformahnce: SromOfluorobnznoBS)Sadr ?CiIfl bSCSbr D)Iiate Caib .7 tumS Form VI A preasit? kmhfnu I cndr io 1. Calculateof Chuck* Mem RWf ICMSSo:LbMm I ihLbR t CaIoratO ~ 3 Date I a a ( 2. AyMeantRRIFCO .O6? k/C Comeauf COM RlRa DM Pag.SP Volalios by GO/MS - inILCarlbration tContiinuAd A) Initial CalibratoWn (CrfusA) I. CatculatOrn Check % RSD 4. %v#,RSD2>'30%? (/CIi ocftd5 Ca~rf Peerm B) Caoinuifin C ~aibato Form VIA presnt?44& as i. Any PAF CO.05?- eP Fla Du I C ~ qojatileS by GCIMS - CI)PgePf Cotnu I 9)Conationin Cuntibrfnfu 1 compound per standard) 2. Calculation Check- % 0 (Minimum wihL~ab eReit ID Iv %D I Filnameef.. ate Wm 3. Any % 0 > 25% ? # L Z, e )i4)6vw6+ C-a Cs-''~cwrit V A-1-w6 toF +Le aCorn U4e 6A- VF0lenave D'sa J o it/I Rtt Ccninu~ly &dsel~n. txz %ez2 a)tuQt~,oS i9tgasz caihhrt+( Wert~4)k $,wepk9-K4a iotA9 At c SNOitvv~~Sa~vt lta~~iTtt Pagejof Volatiles by GO/MS' -CtP 1. Form IVAAr O concenutraiofl level, GO/MS systemn as appropriate?gk 2. Method blank reported for each matrix, if no, eaptaw tha S 3.A comrmon lab contamiflwUs deWtcterif Bl2an GCCMSDae Mheu I2-butanone cigouiteTue ID Da w 4. Othw TCL-S or TiCs eetdi oMr ER S. Any co~ntarn~iaifl detected inFS, V) Surrogate RecoverY samples 1.Form 11 A presend .. t.. All lou say m Entries agre wift raw at?(If'Re' volatileS cy GC/MS - CI)Pgoto r(Cantingi r ~uroo~6 Rcove Lt) Outside limits? fl(U yfl. tmk 2.Any runs with cam (1)Or MOrerecoveris original Re-Run sample SunfoP, I ID Co d %R IVo witiin limits? Plinblw- AllI metiod blast SUMl9g11SS A/he VetIA~ DtrUn2lC1tfl j M~atrl Spilke IMiMrx Spike of Par analYze 1.Number ____ soil wa Maltbc . Froeque1cy' untie &gf whh raw dam? ____ 2. Form III A preS _?_41&.....Results %.RPD CaulifinS OK? 3. ASl %R, RPO wkt WmM?(atbb) * Sam$ SR SDSo"en ID Actioc~~~ 2 otcannmom •S a~.s OA ~~ ~ ~ ~~S~a PageJ2.of Vanalils by GC/MS - CL? (if yu. "Iat:1s) dupliCat9 pairs identfiabIotJ6,LR 1.Are originaVfield Suamgin o origia ar a matra Sam N.?o 2. overall frlqULWW for posit"v paire ralywi): 3. COMMOMfi (Evalua WMO pefodrmanc viiii internal Standards 1. Formn VIllA PreSflVz2tI. w 2. All sanpIG/blU* IS -wtU1flit ust exption: 2"0 secondS of sandwd ISNT? 3 IAulped~l senPAM* S w't List excwftionlt w #4,4.!P-) - ~~~~4.~ ~ ~ - ' Of( VOIbs by GC/MS - C-PPage Ix lompounld rIdetIfication and Cuan~titatlon sample compact and Reutil RT Spwton 'CuculaUt Quawlfed uilt (if different) Number jRasiaced (Form I A) IMath ach OK/ can o_ ca e___ I _C __ __ _ -Lg apllo eis rnI _ _ _ c,-~oAbwor W acd) ___f ____ A______~______O Page.2L of - Volaties by GOftS - CiP and reported (Form I E)? 1. ~ek5tntshuldbesearched,aveal been searched blanks?0______2. Any TICs found in samples also inassociated 3. Are reansonble Wwe~fiat~fl reprtWd ye- S 4. MnY TCL compounds reported a TICS? N/ XII System Performalc* Check for U-rid epainm y or toe folowln ______1. Abrup NC baselire shit _ _ _ 2. High backgroufld Or RT til S hNt nipeila 11 3. asmslne rise _ _ 4. EX#WWOU -P_ __ s. Loubof pOak 'UoiOM ______6. Peak ailing Or / oc~m anm/i at.. COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report ZlIient: IT Corporation Service Request: A9500557 Project: Ejelson AFB/409884 Date Coilected: 8/3/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 8/5/95 Aroimatic Volatile Organics Sample Name: P4020 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: A9500557-1 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Benzene 5030 602 0.5 0.2 1 Sf7195 817/95 ND," Toluene 5030 602 I 0.2 1 8f7195 871/95 NI) Chlorbernzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 8/7/95 Sf7195 ND Ethylbenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 Sf7195 Sf7195 N Xylenes, Total 5030 602 1 0.4 1 Sf7/95 8/7/95 ND)-" 1,3 DCB 5030 602 I 0.2 1 8/7/95 Sf7195 ND /7 %4DCB 5030 602 I 0.2 1 8f7195 817/95 NDe6 i,2 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 8/7/95 8/7/95 ND Approved By: IlDate: ,g') OOSS7PHC1152 esx9v95M. Pag No.. COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report ~fient: IT Corporation Service Request: A9500557 Project: Eielson AFB/409884 Date Collected: 8/3/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 8/5/95 Aromatic Volatile Organics Sample Name: H2022 Units: ugL (ppb) Lab Code: A9500557-2 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Benz 5030 602 0.5 0.2 1 8./795 8/7195 ND - Toluene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 8/7/95 8/7/95 ND"~ Chilorbenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 8/7/95 8/7/95 ND)- Ethylbenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 8/7/95 8/795 ND' Xylenes, Total 5030 '602 I 0.4 I 8/7/95 8/7/95 ND 1,3 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 8/7/95 8/7/95 ND~ fDCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 8n1/95 8/7/95 ND XEDC 5030 602 1 0.2 1 8/7/95 8/7/95 ND- Approved By: 4Date: KS i I S22/042899 W557PHCHS2. BTEX (2)VIM19 PWsNo COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report C-lient: IT Corporation Service Request: A9500557 Project: Eielson AFB/409884 Date Collected: 8/3/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 8/5/95 Aromatic Volatile Organics Sample Name: Q4005 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: A9500557-3 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Benzene 5030 602 0.5 0.2 1 a17/95 Sf7195 N])r Toluene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 8n1/95 8n1/95 ND"" Clhlorbenzee 5030 602 1 0.2 1 817/95 8n1/95 ND." Ethylbenzene 5030 602 1 0.2 1 81795 8n1/95 ND., Xylenes, Total 5030 602 1 0.4 1 817/95 8n1/95 NDtt' 1,3 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 817/9 g81/95 ND V4DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 817/95 8n1/95 eD 1,2 DCB 5030 602 1 0.2 1 81/95 8n1/95 N " Approved By: 1 Date: ______I S22MMS89 P aN PageQ. aof.1 ;3IatIes by QCIMS - CL.P DATA VALIDATION: VOLATILES BY GO/MS (CLP) t.- Profcct'a,:at emrf4 Nubr Otgpqg QC Lcvet tL1 LabID:1C')01q ReponNo: Number and Ty" ofsamples: Cw c Special Instructionsl: I) Holdina Times Field Damk Analyst Sam.N. Imatutz Collectd ?rc~de Date Comments SniNo.,oi: wcQ_ 1S______/f 'DL4002. I I ID aLIoIII j- r)!Aq q is r7 71 I Recommended Actiot •Ld- re S'i/-t .Pbr oloo? arp -taokX IAf" b.o64 Vh+L& eycep4c +ecA4;caf hkalt'J 7 am ~ t4O 9 RnuwIWL1t'VIIJZAJuf 0I'tA OA~ of Volatiles by GC/MS - CLIP Pages IIIP ',strument Performanrce: Sromofluorobeflzefle (FSF)Standard BFB Run GC/MS F OMVA lhna sipiflfl& Rawc IadpmAu Ma conmen Date ID PisTmua*meS' f CIIUAI ?Submeucc Speonatlaim? r / 17~~~~ RecomaendSe Actto O' ok A Ill) Calibration A) Initial Calibration Form V A present ~.4L 1.Calculation Chodck- Mean WR (mkiifum I omccuad.witwaUon ICaubrauionTCM Sa MRM ANwtUbRpr Date ID IRC&fJ MaSi Fliam RU f La n 4PK- L e _ _ - -~~~~~~~~~~'o 2. Any Mean RRIFcO.< ! 0.0 I O mea~t)- Meat 0MB Calbratia COMpound RRP ID Date Cmo _ _ _ - - _ _ _~~~~~~~~~~~~~7/~ U- voalatles by SC/MS - CLP page; ff Ij) Calibration (Continued) A) Initial Calibration (Continued) 3. Calculation Check -% RSD (Minimum Ilwmuprui per afbetmmaymu ameufo mean RRF) C&Oratin aMS jPesvent Date= CID I compound RSD A~ewithLabRe m? 4. AnY %RS > 30% ?(if * thenmIMt _____ Cam4 M ae OR ICOumntes -, .fl ______3 ecomede Adm 1W r~I-eks were vA-e 4 A)fr%,sD 8) Cantinuina Calibratio 1.AnyRARF cO.O6? N( W11OO Stanadu camiadts G FGeaama DMs ID Cam ~dRi RaraSd QA C*IwIrflinThtvT Page of VolatileS by GC/MS - CLP 3,. iiiCalibra~tion (Continued) B)Condflnuinl Calibratonl (Continued) 2. Calculation Check - % D (Minimum I compound per standard) Standlard Cailbration CM I % D AgreewithbLab Report?7 Filename t.I De COMPoud 3. Any % 0 > 25%? 4L (IfytsestC) Filcuase .Date Coma~l dD Rec-umeadldAi K czft/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~OC6 J4W _ Rn~~ewS ~~ ~ ~~ QA~~mcU~flIDS~~~ 2. Methiod blank repored for each matrix, concentrationi level, GC/MS system as appropriate'?4.O-e ______If no, explaiw ______ 322Ay common lab contamlinants detectd? NO (If Yu' then list:) ______Concentratio (secify units) Blank OCIMS Date Methylene ID ID Run Chloride Acetone Tolumne I2-butanaone 4. Other TLs or TICs eetd*l (if*yeluthenlk Blank OCIS Dflts Comcmnuatinu ID ID Rua C01mpowed($citw 5. Any contaminants deetdIn FS. TO, or ER samples? Yd0_ _ _ _ Blank Date bSkee cue Otbht1 ID Colectd Ch"Mtdm Aetms Ttahee J!"frL Nate: DO NOT Hit coampoaf adjIul mo ¶NW band as madaud lab blank COAStaMMatIom inSection IV.S. Vi Surrooiate Recovery 1.Farm 11 A present? 4te 5All. samtples Bsted-2- Entries agree with raw data? 421.(rutgofr UYanyower~pa below.) lkevwwWkLBy/Dow A '141111~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Cis~u( Pageb of J 5* Volatiles by GC/MS - CLP (It,,s then List) 2. Any runs w~it one (1)or mrex recovwfiOs outside limits? yes Sample Surm original Re-Run ID Consandwyea. S Recovery Comments Ono explain below.) All method blank surrogates within limits? y.•(It mendedflf 4sQcttr~ VLhS SkyvU Id be /lsr kd onpyeooo5 Matrix Spike arxSikep Duplicates 1. Number of pairs analyzed ______Matrix so_ water Frequency: ______ 2. Form III A present? V.OL.. Rasult envie agree with raw data? ____ % R. RPD CalculaelionS OK? 3. All % R. APO withinimtA . (U-ictSeamkt) sample R ID ~~So" COMINGS mom RD Coment 7~~4'(kchV5.12ddft4, bOQ('L4A Rftnud l3ly~st 4/fQAaaflI -/A 417 o -,giafleS by GCIMS - CLPPa VII) Field Duplicates 1.Are original/field duplicate pairs identifiable? (If 'ye' then Lilt) Ori~ni DuplicateOiia ulct No. Miti Sample No. ISam Nmatrix Sample No. Sample 2. Overall frequencY: 3. CommonS (Evalat RPOU for Posiv paired analytoe): i'IIl) Intera SadrsPerformance 1.Form VillA presenoV Z...... Areas/RT agee with raw darn? y 2. All sample/blank ISareas wif limbit? Ust oxcetopftu: D- rsjI, 3.AllI sampleblfl ISFITs WMt 30 second of standad ISRTl List ecpii W~~~~~~~~QCOCMM U~~~~~~~.~I Pagejof I[) Volatiles by GCIMS - CI.P P1CopoundIdentficatonrad Quantitatlon Check if ays Result (if different) Sample Compound and Result RT Spectra Calculatito Qualitid Commenam Number ReI d(Fr ) Match Match OK ~q~o3 Thert 23; w6 /L. _____ M-XV~efl2IJ9 A/L o- uel~06 / ___ o vT ~ r ~ 2 ~ o / V______L_ __ - ______007 20JD _ _ _ _ _ -0______ol e, L.i ______9 . a,______~ ~ ~ -tc 3 qLYVhe isoL 2 L Z.. -i I ecominad-a- latiles by QC/MS - CILP Page3... of (X Tentatively Identified CompoGunds 1. Have all peaks that should be searched, been searched and reported (Form I E)? 2. Any T1Cs found in samples also in associated blanks? A/V) 3. Are reasonable identifcations rePoned? t/ 4.Any TCL comipounids reported as TICS? At) XI) System Perforanwe Check for and expl ainy Of fte foiowing 1.Abrupt PlC baseline aft / 2. High backgound or fT thilt 3. Baseline rim et hI UW pr twtA/ 4. Extraneous pSSS Al S.Loassof pe* r"Mhifti AID 8. Peak tailNg or WmQO o ReyomoeadSd Actam, ,None Qepuire4t. Rc*S Up~~ham g//1/~ ( CAc n iZ Pagetof /of Volatiles by GC/M5 CIP Q6hJ s sxi-ek reDbA DYvo8 crte xwl Overall Assessment l e&.,t c h&)¾.Hre 4Ve. k-Ir 1 oH o/rlh., 11 41 s•Le $ - 4 + 4)~4'5ay 0 9 jL ~~ 4rO~aka)A~frtt' 5 4 'tPe-t ~F used as rep t QVMA Ca..M fltflf . ~ Rcttwewd ~ lA EPA SAMPLE NO. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ______D4001 Lab Name: PACE Contract: 409884 ______ La~b Code: PACE Case rNo.: EIELSON SAS No.: SDG No.: 20878 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ED: 20887.6 Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: 21414.0 Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 07/21/95 % Moisture: not dec. ____ Date Analyzed: 08/02/95 GSC Column:DB624 ID: 0.32 (mm) Dilution Factor: 10.0 soil Extract Volume: ___ (uL) Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/IKg) tYG/L Q 71-43-2 ------Benzene______So- 108-88-3 ------Toluene ______2r J 100-41-4 ------Ethylbenzene ______5 r U 108-38-3 ------m,p-Xylene______u 95-47-6 ------o-Xylene_____ST_____ U FORM I VOA 3/90 Al0 00 17 lA EPA SAMPLE NO. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ______ Let,Name: PACE Contract: 409884 D4002____ Lab Code: PACE Case No.: EIELSON SAS lNo.: SDG No.: 20878 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 20888.4 Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: 21415.D Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 07/20/95 %- Moisture: not dec. ____ Date Analyzed: 08/02/95 GC Colurnn:D3624 ID: 0.32 (mm) Dilution Factor: 10.0 Soil Extract Volume: ____(uL) Soil Aliquot Volume: __ (uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q 71-43-2 ------Benzene______u 108-88-3 ------Toluene___24______100-41-4 ------Ethylbenzene ______so U 108-38-3 ------m,p-Xylene ______U 95-47-6 ------o-Xylene______'___ _se U ,221 FORM I VOA 3/90 IL06ri01 lA EPA SAMPLE NO. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ______D4003 L''Name: PACE Contract: 409884 ______Lab Code: PACE Case No.: EIEIJSON SAS No.: SDG No.: 20878 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 20889.2. Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: A21529.D Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 07/20/95 % Moisture: not dec. ____ Date Analyzed: 08/04/95 Ge Column:DB624 ID: 0.32 (mm) Dilution Factor: 10.0 Soil Extract Volume: ___ (uL) Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q 71-43-2 ------Benzene______U 108-88-3 ------Toluene ______2y J 100-41-4 ------Ethylbenzene___Sol,____ U 108-38-3 ------m,p-Xylene ______5( ~U 95-47-6S------o-Xylene ______50/ U FORM I VOA 3/90 I10 0025 lA EPA SAMPLE NO. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ______D4004 L--h Name: PACE Contract: 409884 ______Lab Code: PACE Case No.: EIELSON SAS No.: SDG No.: 20878 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 20890.6 Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: 21407.D Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 07/20/95 % Moisture: not dec. ____ Date Analyzed: 08/02/95 GC Column:DB624 ID: 0.32 (mm) Dilution Factor: 10.0 Soil Extract Volume: ____ uLl Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q 71-43-2 ------Benzene______50- u 108- 8 8-3------Toluene ______29, J 100-41-4 ------Ethylbenzene ______5 O/ U 108-38-3 ------m,p-Xylene______110___ 95-47-6 ------o-Xylene______6 __ FORM I VOA 3/90 A,0 00 30 lA EPA SAMPLE NO. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ______D4005 L-', Name: PACE Contract: 409884 ______Lab Code: PACE Case No..: EIELSON SAS No.: SDG No.: 20878 matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 20891.4 Samnple wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: A21528.D Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 07/20/95 w moisture: not dec. _____Date Analyzed: 08/04/95 GC Column:DB624 ID: 0.32 (mm) Dilution Factor: 10.0 Soil Extract Volume: ____(uL) Soil Aliquot Volume: ____(L) CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUN~D (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q 71-43-2 ------EBenzene______50 U 108-88-3 ------Tolun ______2&, J 100-41-4 ------Ethylbenzene ______50" U 108-38-3 ------m,p-Xylene 410______95-47-6 ------o-Xylene______140_____ FORM I VOA 3/90 10 00 356 lA EPA SAMPLE No. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ______D4006 I-'- Name: PACE Contract: 409884 ______Lab Code: PACE Case No.: EIELSON SAS No.: SDG No.: 20878 matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 20892.2 Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: 21409.D Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 07/20/95 Pi moisture: not dec. ____ Date Analyzed: 08/02/95 GC Column:DB624 ID: 0.32 (mm) Dilution Factor: 10.0 Soil Extract volume: _ __ (uL) Soil Aliquot Volume: _ _ (uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q 71-43-2 ------Benzene______50' U 108-88-3 ------Toluene ______32,, 100-41-4 ------Ethylbenz-ene______50 U 108-38-3 ------m,p-~Xylene______660X___ 95-47-6 ------o-Xlene______290 ___ FORM I VGA 3/90 10002 1A EPA SAMVPLE NO. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ______ D4007 T-b Name: PACE Contract: 409884 ______ Lab Code: PACE Case No.: EIELSON SAS No.: SDG No.: 20878 matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 20893.0 Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: 21410.D Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 07/20/95 % Moisture: not dec. ____ Date Analyzed: 08/02/95 GC Column:DB624 ID: 0.32 (mm) Dilution Factor: 10.0 Soil Extract volume: _ __ (uL) Soil Aliquot Volume: (__uLl CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q 71-43-2 ------Benzene______S U 10 8- 88-3------Toluene ______54 100-41-4 ------Ethylbenzene______50. U 108-38-3 ------m,p-Xylene______390, 95-47-6 ------o-Xylene______170 ___ FORM I VOA 3/90 A1oroO4 1A EPA SAMPLE NO. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ______D4008 Lab Name: PACE Contract: 409884 ______Lba Code: PACE Case No.: EIELSON SAS No.: SDG No.: 20878 matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 21117.6 sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: A21914.D Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 07/21/95 % Moisture: not dec. ____ Date Analyzed: 08/08/95 GC Column:DB624 ID: 0.32 (mm) Dilution Factor: 10.0 Soil Extract Volume: ___ (uL) Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) tTG/LQ 71-43-2 ------Benzene______C~5tj 108-88-3 ------Toluene ______2 -g t 100-41-4 ------Ethyl-benzene ______5 DI i08-38-3 ------m,p-Xylene ______5a 41 95-47-6 ------o-Xylene ______5 FORM I VOA 3/90 1005 PageJ.....f ' Volatile by GCIMS CI.P DATA VALIDATION: VOLATILES BY GCI99tIP) QC LevL. ]O pr,,ectxNamc. 2te(sc~ H Number qf f/cop,~fr Lab ID:22Q/ Revon NO: 1 Numberafld TWOOfSampler special Imnsaaiout I) Holding Times$ sample No. mtt 1~~~/oor er I-H 1471 '~~~~~~~~~~P*.apkeedgeM cl No=~ aec4t+ek&rcz ~(ttvrtttvy eclevei +h ;z's t 4oaty ~~~~ ~~e)cceee.L ~/.A.2cay A CocwWatmS Ra avowIA' Page 2-of Valatiles by GC/MS . CLP (PS) Standard il I)strument Performaflct: BromoflucrObeflflnb -Mwm jSumuu o Daze'S I T~ne lmm Ck4. Iiii Calribrstion A) Initial Calibrmtiw Form AI A presnfi? J unufoffIcalu 1. Calcutofl Check. Meam RRV (mh Calibr~~~~~~~~~~~~~~l 2.An Mean RRIFCO .O5? IV1Whe om Corn RRP DDt F,~~~ AC2MO RevAn /nti 7R? Page3 Off VolatllsI by GCIMS .01) .d) Calibration LContinuedl A) Initial Carlbraton (Coninued) ,mufn manRF Check - % RSO (MinzmvS lSUVWA Pm ahbrnti wy7- 3. Calculation PeFrcent 0 RS ~ With Lab~ Date ID ~~~Compond e gott 4.A % RSD)>30% ? (it ID Date RSDmCanon t ' rCMcudnt) -CJ'dor lV),' k& 4-S91 9) Continuing Calibaton Form ViL&prsmswit?42 1. Any RRF cO.O5 ? /Dtet standardC fl GM a I ThoMAs DaI O Volatiles by GC/MS - CIPPge gW yalibratlOn (Continued) I compound per standard) 2. Calculation Check - % 0 (Minimum ~rtin OCM eewVthbLabRepr standard~ conCeI d I SD Riename Ret! (if' 7 UtbSHt) 3. Any % 0 > 25%?7 s Renam~ Da c e(-MP4er-esi- 2kod& toei+ 4TE okij cvnpvu.As RecomendedActf Shcez1 sat.. O acAou, I's Sw as Itro1 SUII~fr4k 44~~~~~n of j Volatiles by GCIMS - CPPage 1%)Blanks . 7 1. Formr IV AprwSwdetit 11 level, GC/MS system as aPr7ae4Lo 2. Method blank reported for each mnarix, concentration If no, eqpl*w NC if thnnit:c 3.Any common lab contaminants detected? Couthntrae Blank OC/MS Date Tolunec I12-butanane in I Run .Aea 7 u s*at 4. O1tte TCLs or TiCs deftected? R((f ID RuaeMWM1 ER S. Any contamiiiaints deected InFS. TB or Blank Daa Mty' asalataclaa ln IV.S. NoteOT lt DOwmma ajus tOW ba mm~e \A Surrogate Reovr 1.Form 11A preswOt 40ry& AllhsmnpbsfttJld4•L. (If V for anY arnw rIMS blo. Envries agree with raw dam? pg -O VolatilOS by OC/US - CI.P itnt) outside limits? L&. (ifwyts then 2. Any runs wirn one (1)or more rec~rieOs Re-Runl Sample Sr~t uh ~n* xpain below') Allmtiodblank surrogates within limit? L.(if3 ) Mmatix Spike I Matrix. Spike DuoticatOS WSW___ 1. NumberOf ofairanaiYZed Maltrix____ Frequenlcy . Asifti unties a"e wth raw data? ____ 2.Form IIl A presnt ... 4L..S.._. % R, RPD Caloflhoi OK? -4L (IPSVIlkt) 3. Anl %R. RPD wtflhf IftWb .gL SaR l MD~~~~^ CommenD ID Cam 1421USD f~t- pi 4 'g 0 4iLO- I~oAsA rt.>7 /&hr~f¶hdade/ +L#- Pagej of ~,bwdls by GCIMS - CLP TZ.. (if y thent tat:) 1. Are original/field duplicate pair identifiabI2le nI~~~2~~5Th onginal p to SamSa No NSam MI 2. Overal frequencf: u/l wialytes) 3. CommWfl (Evaluat RPO* for posit ivepaed 1.Form V111A preser't7yZL...... AreshIRT agres wIt raw data' 2. All sarPliOblrk ISWM Wfl" lW ust exception standad ISRT? ___ 3.All saMPle/b*ISt NTG WOW 30 acrdof Listexetol ACIDf 4 N - ktYe(4 9 2-K Pge O Vola*Ie by GC/MS -CI, and puarittllatlof [ comrpocund IdeitlffI~Ct~lfi i ~eet check if 'Cii~l~uQuaui Rasut:(fdfeet Samplnd COSCUU'Rnk R Sp~ KCommengf IA Mac ac umbe REC ed Fan r m -y~~~~,~~~q&COO~~~~L4- 4-'- 0-4%OOOO~q ~~ 4 o \,u~atilfl by GC/MS - CPPae x Tntaivey denifid ompunds reported (Form I E)? 1. aveallpeas mt soud be searched, been searched and N/IA- 2. Arty TICs found hi sample' also tn assocated blanks? 3. Are reasonable idenlfiatWrIrpoted y~es NO______4. Any TCL compounds reported as TIWs XI0 System Perforfnanoce Chock for and explain any OFfte fodlW~ng baselinIe AMV 1.Abrupt NC b 2.HighbackgroundWorRT yes'It .~ .- e 3. Baeine rhe at high Wniperabfl AO' o-c kv 4. Ext"MOU PUSS I aft5CLn-e S. Loss of pea e UkOM ______6. Peak tailing or NPItg No ,h~tetKzes~t ROCMMOdedACU N auflok 'oOJ ¾,rkd OL' ~tj kT-54A u4444&&4 4cv~~~~~~tcedi4Th~Olonf~k' VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - I A Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract: 409884 Case No: EIELSON LablO: PIM SDG No: 22914 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 22914.8 Sample Vol (ml): 5.0 Client Sample ID: T1005 Dilution Factor 100000. Date Sample Collected: 07118195 Date Extracted: 08/16/95 Method: SW8020 Date Analyzed: 0a/1 6195 Date Sample Rcvd: 08/04/95 Units: UG/L Compound Name Result PQL Benzene 1200000 iooaao Ethylbenzene 17000007" iooooa Toluene 670000 V' 100000 m,p-Xylenes 5200000k- 100000 o-Xylenes 2300000 100 O SNA by OCIMS - CLPPae DATA VAuDATION:/M(C) //wa- ~~bI:K9~52LRep~t~o •- Nu.betafdTypeo(SaffPl 1i HoAIdfO Tme comments pyoservaeio Darn Duen Sam No Matflth~ 0) IL V-t INI c~~~~~la Ie,,~Vd Pag- BNA byGC/MS.-CLP (DFTPPI Standard iiigtumeterfrmace:Deaflor~~iheflVI hosphine Juno DMP Run ~~I OV I I~~~~~~~~~~ A) Initial Caribrallmf omn e 11NM 1.Calculationm h MM& m~ Dat~~~~~~~~d~ s wthLboepr ircO ~~~H. ==M thenalIC) 2. A Mean RRFPCO.O5?f MenCanS Corn ~RR? I Dam Page-j..of 3NA by GC/MS CLP 1IiiCarlibration (Continued A) Initiai CalibratioQ-n(CnW9tnu) UMU for mean RRfl 3. Calculation Check % RSO (MismaaI comM~Apffcafibntmw Spli a CnsIM main caa~ration RSD ArewithLAb Report Date I ID i Corpond- 4.Anl % RSD'>30%? (SIf W athnUti Percent COMS Cawibatiol Corn4 ~RSD ID Daes /~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~/, cesW+5 fwb4 0 enzLc,')pmbraett~A cn'>ov-rL"J were pan-ldzt/e4O 1~xdru.C,2i3cc~preLarer IlI rLoDA - devt/, itL- a) ContnuinlO Caration PageŽI/of BNA by GC/MS-CL" I. alQibraflion (Continued) SICContinuinga Ca~librAtqn (Continued 1 compound per standard) 2. Calculation CheCk - % 0 (Minimum I D AgewihLb t Calibrflaf GCdwt I t Scandaftd Comn d I% mba~ Fiensme Retl Dat L-CI I I.14 /4-1)~~~~~ I /qy" I A),:,4441e 3. Any % 0> 25% -.IeS (IUyWzhatc) DMe Corncd*D 'F Rnme 31~% 7 71 r /2:5% f 4ct.0 r7, A outED 7t0rjzyqFves..______I S FiLGKCON. first~~~~~72 ~~~~p c~~r- e 3g) S29 T r ores.3/9 O3t &D 9Zq'-z -~oe2 a~- 4 sL-S r r Reomne ,ts ftc ~ (lRc3I. (a)r y: ______Page S f NAby GC/MS -CLP Bn.lanks j•k 1. Form IV(s) poetZ 1(- level, extr'action batch as approprnate?ZL~- 2. Method blank reported for each Matrix. conlcenfralofl 11 no- then explain: detected? L (ifUyes then Use) 3. Any common phthlaite esters* (lab contaminants) *b -itt talate ofrdi44bthub-ealate se uniaw ID EedCOntamlnaflU!3S C~v. concantntioa dinmHot) 4. Clew TCI~s or Tl~s deOWWdMg (W y k1IfyAte Uc S. c ntam t dcWd inFS or ER Gain C~~~~nwaed t)CSWI SS)guty asadated lab blank eatua~astaCi tu SMscton. Note: DO NUT1h caawMg adjus toWO~ bust an VIi Surroate ~Recover!Y = INlif sted? 1.Form II present ANl uo In any auir clapmi below.) Entrice agree with raw dam? kJ ~(if QA Cmmtu RininS'LI 4 ~ 73 ~ Page.j of BMA by GC/MS - CI?1 Surrolti eCOVrY (ontiued) (if(I-yu. then List) 2.Any rufli wit 2 recoveries outside limits? (IfOn'epai eo, All method blank surrOgta withini limits? 11 Matrix Sulks I MathXSpike Duplcat Pairs 1. Number of pairs anaYZOt MN___ -war Froequfcy, CO raw data? 2. preent?For Ill~) egut enores a"e wilh % R. RPD CSCUmhflw OK? 3. All % R. RPO wiltOi?(rralc MS/MiD~~~~~~R F ID SR MD~777 page of NhAby GC/MS-CLP id~ntifiabletjlt?.(tWe m i. Are originail/feld duplicate Pairs No. ~~ ~ ~ M* e No.L6a. 2tOverallfreqJWWCYN/ paired anayts): 3. Conmfl (Evauafte Rpos for posifv Areah/R ags WMU raw date? / 2. AM sampleiblW*ISaewlnUrS List Mxetos: f sanderd ISFIT? 3. All SaMPlIbMIWt 58Th wil' 30 econda List ectlowlr OA RWAWWWImmol Pae o 5PM by GC/MS CIP A Copoud Ientfictlol ad uauntitatkfl Result (if diffrentj T~pi Ca-alcu@st QuaLified SampleIC oEpSund and Resul OICmo NumberI R~nd INabIM~ pgpo'-iI fl~~~~~~~~~~~~cve~~~~~~-Ni - - ~~~~~LAT -~~~~~~~~~~~I i- P - - P - k-L-I U-4-I TT C; V ott Al~~~~~~~~~~~~~I - - - -~~~~~~~~IL uA ______- - - PageiL. of t3NA by GC/MS - CLP (XITetatveY Ienifid omounds been searched and reiported? /vA4 1.Hawe all peaks that should be searched, associated blanks? g C 2. Any TICs found in samples also in xi C 3. Art reasonable identflctfla reported? TICsI? MU 4. Any TC. co~moadS reported -2 MII suem Pefomll Check for and explIn any of Ie foawinig AfD 1.AbWpRIC ba~ms hfmSt ruse at tfl Sffipifll uOH 3. Baseline L- 4. EXnrSOU5 NOIt of Pea ~k*mfitl WC S. LOSS -A[ 6. Peak tailing ar spit; f L- IBRA by OCIMS -CIPP?-L XI)Overall Assessmentcj 4* mT~~~~~~~~~I e gt~~~~~~~~~~ / COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Zlient:- International Technology Corporation Service Request: K(9504521 Project: Eielson AF~B Date Collected: 7/18/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/21,25/95 Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons Sample Name: P4004 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: K9504521-001 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Naphthalene EPA 3510OA 8310 1 0.2 1 7/2/95 7/29/95 ND Acenaphthylene EPA 3510OA 8310 1 0.2 1 7/25/95 7/29/95 ND Acenaphthene EPA 3510OA 8310 1 0.06 1 7/25/95 7/29/95 ND Fluorene EPA 3510OA 8310 0.2 0.006 1 7/25/95 7/29/95 ND L(AS Phenanthrene EPA 3510OA 8310 0.1 0.02 1 7/25/95 7/29/95 0.03 J Anthrazene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.004 1 7/25/95 7/29/95 ND juoranthene EPA 3510OA 8310 0.2 0.008 1 7/25/95 7/29/95 ND Pyrene EPA 3510OA 8310 0.2 0.004 1 7/25/95 7/29/95 ND (As- Benz(a)andhaacene EPA 3510OA 8310 0.1 0.006 1 7/25/95 7/29/95 ND Chrysene EPA 3510OA 8310 0.1 0.009 1 7/25/95 7/29/95 ND Benzo(b)fluoranthene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.009 1 7/25/95 7/29/95 ND Benzo(k)fluoranthene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.003 1 7/25/95 7/29/95 ND Benzo(a)pyrene EPA 3510OA 8310 0.1 0.003 1 7/25/95 7/29/95 ND Dibenz(a,h)anthmcene EPA 3510OA 8310 0.1 0.01 I 7/25/95 7/29/95 ND Benzo(g,hJi)perylene EPA 3510OA 8310 0.2 0.009 I 7/25/95 7/29/95 ND) Indcno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene EPA 3510OA 8310 0.1 0.007 1 7/25/95 7/29/95 ND Approved By: ______Date: 04521SV0 DHI -i MSFPgnN. (IC U COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Client: lontunational Technology Corporation Service Request: K(9504521 Project: Eielson AFB Date Collected: 7/18/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/21,25/95 Polymuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons Sample Name: P4005 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: K9504521-002 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysts Dilution Date Date Remilt Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Remilt Notes Naphthalene EPA 3510A 8310 1 0.2 1 7/25/95 7/29/95 ND Acenaphthylene EPA 3510A 8310 1 0.2 1 7/25/95 7/29/95 ND Aocnaphthene EPA 3510A 8310 1 0.06 1 7/25/95 7/29/95 ND Fluorene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.04 1 7/25/95 7/29/95 ND DT LAZF Pheiianthrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.02 1 7/25195 7/29/95 ND Anthracene EPA 3510.A 8310 0.1 0.004 1 7/25/95 7/29/95 ND ~iuoranthene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.008 I 7/25/95 7/29/95 ND Pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.006 1 7/25/95 7/29/95 ND DT W5~ Benz~a)anthrwAcne EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.006 1 7/25/95 7/29/95 ND Chrysene EPA 3510OA 8310 0.1 0.009 I 7/25/95 7/29/95 ND Benzo(b)fluoranthene EPA 3510OA 8310 0.2 0.009 1 7/25/95 7/29/95 ND 8enzo(k)fluoranthiene EPA 351QA 8310 0.1 0.003 1 7/25/95 7/29/95 ND Henzo(a)pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.003 1 7/25/95 7/29/95 ND Dibenz(ao)antlhracene EPA 3510OA 8310 0.1 0.01 1 7/25/95 7/2/5 ND Benzo(gjhi~)perylene EPA 3510OA 8310 0.2 0.009 I 7/25/95 7/29/95 ND lndeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrcne EPA 3510OA 8310 0.1 0.007 1 7/25/95 7/29/95 ND Approved By: ______Date: 1522MM525 0452ISVGQDHI -2&t'Y5 pae No. COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report clIient: International Technology Corporation Service Request K(9504521 Project: Eielson ALFB Date Collected: 7/18/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/21,25/95 Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons Sample Name: P4006 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: K9504521-003 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Naphthalene EPA 3510A 8310 1 0.2 1 7/25/95 7/29/95 ND Acenaphthylene EPA 3510OA 8310 1 0.2 1 7/25/95 7/29/95 ND Acenaphthene EPA 3510A 8310 1 0.06 1 7125/95 7/29/95 ND Fluorene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.006 1 7125/95 7/29/95 ND LZY Phenantluree EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.02 1 7125/95 7/29/95 ND 4,nthraceae EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.004 1 7/25/95 7/29/95 ND Lobranthene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.008 1 7125/95 7/29/95 ND Pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.004 I 7125/95 7/29/95 ND A Benzga)anthraoene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.006 1 7125/95 7/29/95 ND Chrysene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.009 1 7125/95 7/29/95 ND Benzo(b)fluoranthene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.009 1 7/25/95 7/29/95 ND Bernzo(k)fluaranthene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.003 1 7/25/95 7/29/95 ND Benzo(a)pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.003 I 7125/95 7/29/95 ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.01 1 7125/95 7129/95 ND Benzo(g,hAi)perylcne EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.009 1 7/25/95 7/29/95 ND lndeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrcne EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.007 1 7/25/95 7129/95 ND p63 Approved By: co Date: 4') 1S22'052595 045218V0.DH I -3&¶5 popNo& u*n COLUMBI1A ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Client: International Technology Coaporation Service Request: K(9504521 Project: Ejicson AFB Date Collected: 7/18/95 Sample Matrix: water Date Received: 7/21,25/95 Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons Sample Name: P4Q07 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: K9504521-004 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Remilt Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Naphthalene EPA 3510A 8310 1 0.2 1 7125/95 8/1/95 ND Acenaphthylcne EPA 3510A 8310 1 0.2 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Acenaphthene EPA 3510A 8310 1 0.06 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Fluorene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.006 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND A Phenanthrene EPA 3510OA 8310 0.1 0.02 1 7125/95 8/1/95 ND Anthracene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.004 1 7/25/95 a/1/95 ND fhuoranthene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.008 1 7125/95 8/1/95 ND Pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.004 1 7125/95 8/1/95 ND) GS 8/1/95 ND Benz~a)anthracene . EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.006 1 7/25/95 Chrysene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.009 1 7125/95 8/1/95 ND Benzo(b)fluoranthene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.009 1 7125/95 8/1/95 ND Benzo(k)fluoranthene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.003 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Benzo(a)pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.003 1 7125/95 8/1/95 ND Dibenz(a,h)anthraccne EPA 3510OA 8310 0.1 0.01 1 7125/95 8/1/95 ND Benzo(g,h,i)perylene EPA 3510OA 8310 0.2 0,009 1 7125/95 8/1/9 ND Indeno(1,2,3-ccd)pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.007 1 7125/95 8/1/95 ND No. 052J3VG.DHI -4Ml5 Pgt COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Client:. Internationul Techinology Corporation Service Request K(9504521 Project: Eielson AFB Date Collected: 7/18/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/21,25/95 Polymuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons Sample Name: P4008 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: K(9504521-005 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Naphtbalmne EPA 3510A 8310 1 0.2 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Acenaphtbhylene EPA 3510A 8310 1 0.2 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Acenaphithene EPA 3510A 8310 I 0.06 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Fluorene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.006 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND 1. Pheniantlhrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.02 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND kntlhracene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.004 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND 'uoranthene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.008 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.004 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Benz~a)anthracene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.006 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Chrysene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.009 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Benzo(b)fluoranthene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.009 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Benzo(k)fluoranlbane EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.003 1 7/25195 8/1/95 ND Benzo(a)pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.003 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Dibenz(a,h)anthiracenc EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.01 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Benzo(g~bi)perylene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.009 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrenc EPA 3510OA 8310 0.1 0.007 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND p7y Approved By: (P Date IS72/52M9 04521SV0DHI -5 &M~5 PIP No.: *COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report dijent: International Technology Corporation Service Request: K9504521 Project: Eielson AFB Date Collected: 7/18/9 5 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/21,25/95 Polymuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons Sample Name: P4009 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: K9504521-006 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Naphthalene EPA 3510A 8310 I 0.2 1 7125195 8/6/95 16 - pi" Acenaphthylcne EPA 3510A 8310 1 10 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND DF Acenphthene EPA 3510A 8310 1 0.06 1 7/25195 8/1/95 ND o -t Fluorene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.006 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 0.6., Phenanthrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.02 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 0.3Al Anthracene EPA3510A 18310 0.! 0.004 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND iluoranthene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.02 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND DT Pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.01 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND DT UTC Benz(a)anthracene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.006 I 7125/95 8/1/95 ND Chrysene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.009 1 7125/95 8/1/95 ND Benzob)fluoranthene EPA 3 510OA 8310 0.2 0.009 1 7125/95 8/1/95 ND Benzo(k)fluoranthene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.003 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Benzo(a)pyrene EPA 3510OA 8310 0.1 0.003 I 7125/95 8/1/95 ND Dibenz(OI)anthiracene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.01 I 7125/95 8/1/95 ND Benzo(g,hi,i)perylene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.009 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND lndeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.007 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Approved By: ______Date: l1=/52595 042 ISVG.DH2 -I 9Jl5 Pqe No.. COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Client: International Tecimology Corporation Service Request: 19(950521 Project: Ejelson AFB Date Collected: 7/18/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/21,25/95 Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons Sample Name: P4011 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: K9504521-007 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysis Diuluion Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRlL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Naphthalene EPA 3510A 8310 1 0.2 1 7/25195 811/95 ND Acenaplhthylene EPA 3510A 8310 1 0.2 1 7/25/95 8/1195 ND Acenshthene EPA 3510A 8310 1 0.06 1 7/25/95 a/1/95 ND Fluorene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.006 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND CA5 Phenanthrcne EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.02 1 7/25/95 811/95 ND Anthracene EPA351OA 8310 0.1 0.004 1 7/25/95 $11/95 ND )uoruthene EPA 3510OA 8310 0.2 0.008 1 7/25/95 811/95 ND Pyrene EPA 3510OA 8310 0.2 0.004 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND 14 Benz(a)antbiracene EPA 3510OA 8310 0.1 0.006 I 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Chrysene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.009 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Benzob)fluoranthene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.009 1 7/25/95 811/95 ND Benzo(k)fluoranthene EPA35IOA 8310 0.1 0.003 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Benzo(a)pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.003 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Dibenz~a,h)anthracene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.01 1 7/25/95 $11/95 ND Benzo(g~h,i)perylene EPA 3510OA 8310 0.2 0.009 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene EPA 3510OA 8310 0.1 0.007 1 7/25/95 811/95 ND 93 Approved By: ______Date: _ ____ 15Thf52595 O42ISVMlUfl29flJ5 pWNo.: yU K COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Client: International Technology Corporation Service Request: K(9504521 Project: Eielson AFB Date Collected: 7/19/9 5 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/21,25/95 Polyrnuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons Sample Name: P401 0 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: K9504521-008 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Remilt Notes Naphthalene EPA 3510A 8310 1 0.02 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Acenaphithylene EPA 3510A 8310 I 0.02 1 7025/95 8/1/95 ND Acenaphithene EPA 3510A 8310 1 0.06 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Fluorene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.006 1 7025/95 8/1/95 ND 4 Phernanthrene EPA 35 10A 8310 0.1 0.02 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND A&nthraCm=e EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.004 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND &6iranthene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.008 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.004 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND LKY5 Benz(a)anthracene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.006 1 7025/95 8/1/95 ND Chryene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.009 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Benzo(b)fluoranthene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.009 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Benzo(k)fhuoranthene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.003 1 7025/95 8/1/95 ND Benzo(a)pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.003 I 7025/95 8/1/95 ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.01 1 7025/95 8/1/95 ND Benzo(g,h~i)perylene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.009 I 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.007 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Ap~proved By: Date: IS22/032395 0521 SVG0DH2.-31t9 Pap No., uIjJ1 COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Client: International Technology Corporation Service Request: K9504521 Project: Eielson AFB Date Collected: 7/19/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/21,25/95 Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons Sample Name: P4012 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: K9504521-009 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRlL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Naphthalene EPA3510A 8310 1 0.2 1 7/25/95 8/6i/95 23-,P9? Acenaphthylene EPA 3510OA 8310 tO 10 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND DF Acenaphlitene EPA 3510A 8310 1 0.2 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND) DT Fluorene EPA 3510A 8310 2 2 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND DF LUCC- Pherianthrcec EPA 3510A 8310 2 2 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 NDl DF Anthracene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.004 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 0.006 bg-J fhuoranthene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.08 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND DT Pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.08 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND DT LXS Benz(a)anthracene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.006 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Chrysene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.009 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Benzo(b)fluoranthene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.009 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Benzogk)fluoranthene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.003 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Benzo(a)pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.003 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND) Dibenz~ajh)anthracene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.01 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Benzo(g,h,i)perylcne EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.009 I 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.007 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Aprved By: 2Date: IS22i052595 0452I SVGDH2 .4 &t5 Ppc No.: I COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Clients Intemnational Technology Corporation Service Request: K(9504521 Project: Ejelson AFB Date Collected: 7/19/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/21,25/95 Polymuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons Sample Name: P4013 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: K9504521-010 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Resuit Analyte Method Method Mitt MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Naphthalene EPA 3510A 8310 1 0.400 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND DT Acenaphthylene EPA 3510A 8310 1 0.2 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Acenaphthene EPA 3510A 8310 1 0.06 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Fluorene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.02 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND DT L(X Phenantlhrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.02 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Anthracene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.004 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND luoranthene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.02 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND DT Pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.004 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND A Benzga)anthracene EPA 3510OA 8310 0.1 0.006 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Chrysene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.009 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 NDl Berizo(b)fluoranthene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.009 I 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Benzo(k)fluomninhene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.003 I 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Benzo(a)pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.003 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Dibenz~a,h)anthracene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.01 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Bcnzo(g,hj)peryiene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.009 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.007 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Approved By: Date: I3Th52"55 0452 ISVC;.Din .5 tMfl Pq No. :ujr COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report .Jlient Intertiational Techology Corporation Service Request: 1(9504521 Project: Eielson AFB Date Collected: 7/1919 5 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/21,25/95 Polymuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons Sample Name: P4014 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: K(9504521-011 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analytc Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Naphthalene EPA 3510A 8310 I 0.2 1 7M2/95 8/619$ 5 ~-' Acenaphthylene EPA 3510OA 8310 1 2 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND DF Acenaphthene EPA 3510A 8310 1 0.06 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Fluorene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.006 I 7/25/95 811195 0. 13t Phenanthirene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.02 1 7/25/95 /11195 0. Anthracene EPA3510QA 8310 0.1 0.004 1 7/2/95 811/95 ND , aoranthene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.02 1 7/25/95 8/1195 ND DT Pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.004 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Benz(a)anthracene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.006 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Chrysene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.009 1 7/25/95 811/95 ND Benzo(b)fluoranthene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.009 1 7/25/95 811/95 ND SBnzo(k)fluoranthe EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.003 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Benzo(a)pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.003 I 7/25195 811/95 ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.01 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Benzo(g,Ii~)perylene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.009 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND 1ndIn~,2,3-cd)pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.007 1 7/25/95 8/1/95 ND Approved By: ______Date G452ISVO DH3 -I M5 PareNo.. cuL COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Client: International Techology Corporation Service Request K9504521 Project: Eielson AFB Date Collected: 7/19/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/21,25/95 Polynuiclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons Sample Name: P4015 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: K9504521-012 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRlL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Naphthalene EPA 3510A 8310 I 0.2 1 7/25/95 8t2/95 ND Acenaplhthylene EPA 3510A 8310 1 0.2 1 7t25/95 812/95 ND Acenaphthene EPA 3510A 8310 1 0.06 1 7/25/95 8/295 ND Fluorene EPA 3510A 8310 1 0.006 1 7/25/95 8/295 ND LiT Phemathrcne EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.02 1 7/25/95 8/2/95 0~ &r~ Antlhracene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.004 1 7/25/95 8/295 NDe ;luornthenae EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0-008 1 7/25/95 8/2/95 ND Pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.004 1 7/25/95 8/2/95 ND Benz(a)anthracen~e EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.006 1 7/25/95 8/2/95 ND Chrysene EPA 3510OA 8310 0.1 0.009 1 7125/95 8/2/95 ND Benzo(b)fluoranthenc EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.009 1 7/25/95 8/2195 ND Benzo(k)fluoranthiene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.003 1 7125/95 8/2/95 ND Benzo(a)pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.003 1 7/25/95 8/2/95 ND Dibenz~a,h)antlnccne EPA 3510A 8310 -0.1 0.01 1 7/25/95 812/95 ND Benzo(g,h,i)peryiene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.009 1 7/25/95 8/295 ND lndeno(l,2,3-cd~pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.007 1 7/25/95 8/2/95 ND Approved By: ______Date: O4S21SVO0H3 -27h/5 P No: COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, [NC. Analytical Report Client: International Tecliology Corporation Service Request: K(9504521 Project: Ejelson AFB Date Collected: 7/19/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/21,25/95 Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons Sample Name: P4016 Units: ugJL (ppb) Lab Code: K(9504521-013 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Naphthalane EPA 3510A 8310 1 0.400 I 712/95 812/95 ND DT Acenaplhthylene EPA 3510OA 8310 1 0.2 I 7/25/95 8/2/95 ND Acenaphthene EPA 3510OA 8310 1 0.06 1 7/25/95 8/2/95 ND Fluorene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.006 I 7/25/95 8/2/95 0.10~- 41$ Phenanthrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.02 1 7/25/95 8/2/95 06 AndUlOIaCe EPA 3510OA 8310 0.1 0.004 I 7125/95 8/2/95 ND luoranthene EPA 3510OA 8310 0.2 0.008 1 7/25/95 8/2/95 ND Pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.005 I 7/25/95 8/2/95 ND DTL¶ Benz~a)anthracene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.006 1 7/25/95 8/2/95 ND Chrysenie EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.009 1 7/25/95 8/2/95 ND Benzo(b)fluoranthene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.009 1 7/25/95 8/2/95 ND Benzok)fluoranthcne EPA351OA 8310 0.1 0.003 1 7/25/95 8/2/95 ND Benzo(a)pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.003 1 7/25/95 8/2/95 ND Dibenz~a,h)anthiracene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.01 I 7/25/95 8/2/95 ND Benzo(gjhi~)pcrylene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.009 1 7/25/95 8/2/95 ND 1ndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.007 1 7/25/95 8/295 ND Approved By: ______Date: 152V52593 G4S21SVG.DH3.3 ~M3 Pap No COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Client: hItemiatioiial Techology Corporation Service Request K9504521 Project: Ejelson AFB Date Collected: 7/19/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/21,25/95 Polymuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons Sample Name: P4017 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: K9504521-014 Basis: A Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Naphthalene EPA 3510A 8310 1 0.400 1 7/25/95 8/2/95 ND DT Acenaphthylene EPA 3510A 8310 1 0.2 1 7/25/95 8/2/95 ND Acenaphithene EPA 3510A 8310 1 0.06 1 7/25/95 8t2/95 ND Fluorene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.006 1 7/25/95 8/295 ND 4 f Phenanthirene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.02 I 7/25/95 8/2/95 0.05.'~/f6 J Anthracene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.004 1 7/25/95 8/295 ND )luoranthene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.02 1 7/25/95 8/2/95 ND DT Pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.006 1 7/25/95 8/2/95 ND DT u5S Benz~a)anthracene EPA 35 10A 8310 0.1 0.006 1 7/25/95 8/2/95 ND Chrysene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.009 1 7/25/95 8/2/95 ND Benzo(b)fluoranthene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.009 1 7/25/95 8/295 ND Benzo(k)fluoranthene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.003 1 7/25/95 8/2/95 ND Bez~~prn EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.003 1 7/25/95 8/295 ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.01 1 7/25/95 8/2/95 ND Benzog,h,i)perylene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.009 1 7/25/95 8/2/95 ND Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.007 1 7/25/95 8/2/95 ND Approved By: ______Date: 15221052595 04521SVG.DM3. 4 MS%95 N.> COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Client. Intrniational Techology Corporation Service Request: K9504521 Project: Eielson AFB Date Collected: 7/19/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/21,25/95 Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons Sample Name: P4018 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: K9504521-015 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Remilt Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Naphthalene EPA 3510A 8310 1 0.2 1 7M/295 Sf295 ND Acenaphthylene EPA 3510A 8310 1 0.500 I 7/25/95 8/2/95 ND DT Acenaphithene EPA 3510A 8310 1 0.06 1 7/25/95 8/2/95 ND Fluorene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.02 1 7/25/95 8/2/95 ND DT A' Phenanthrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.02 1 7/25/95 8/2/95 0.02 -" Anthracene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.004 1 7/25/95 8/2/95 ND ei ,iuoranthene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.008 1 7/25/95 8/2195 ND Pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.004 1 7/25/95 8/2/95 NDLV Benz(a)antlhraccne EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.006 1 7/25/95 8/295 ND Chrysene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.009 1 7/25/95 8/2/95 ND B3enzo(b)fluorantliene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.009 1 7/25/95 8/2/95 ND Benzok)fluoraflce EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.003 1 7/25/95 Sf2195 ND Benzo(a)pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.003 1 7/25/95 82/295 ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracnen EPA 3510OA 8310 0.1 0.01 1 7/25/95 8/295 ND Benzo(g,hi,i)perylene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.009 1 7/25/95 821295 ND 1ndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.007 1 7/25/95 8/2/95 ND Approved By: (5Date: ilzvmnm W452SVG.DH3SM.5&'9 NO.. COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Client: International Technology Corporation Service Request: K9504521 Project: Ejelson AFB Date Collected: 7/20/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/25/95 Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocaitons Sample Name: P4019 Units: ug/L (ppb) Lab Code: K9504521-017 Basis: NA Test Notes: Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result Analytic Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes Naphthalene EPA 3510A 8310 I 0.2 I 7127/95 812/95 ND Acenaphthylene EPA 3510A 8310 1 0.2 1 7127/95 802/95 ND Acenaphthene EPA 3510A 8310 1 0.06 1 7127/95 802/95 ND Fluorene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.006 1 7/27/95 8W295 0. 116 A' Phenanthrene EPA3510A 8310 0.1 0.02 1 7127195 802/95 ND p2 Anthracene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.004 1 7127/95 8/2/95 ND ,,urnthn P31A81 . .0 /79 /5 N Pyuratene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.008 1 7127/95 812/95 ND Byenze nliaceEPA 3510OA 8310 0.2 0.004 1 7127/95 802/95 ND Chyenaanhae neEPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.006 I 7127/95 8W295 ND L4 Bhyenzobeurat eEPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.009 1 7127/95 81295 ND Benzo(b)fluoranthene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.009 1 7127/95 802/95 ND Benzo(a)pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.003 I 7127/95 8/1/95 ND Dibenz~a,h)anthracene EPA 3510A 8310 0.1 0.01 1 71271/95 81295 ND, Benzo(g,h,i)perylene EPA 3510A 8310 0.2 0.009 1 7127/95 812/95 ND 1ndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene EPA 3510A 8310 0.! 0.007 1 7127/95 812/95 ND AprvdBy: ______Date: 04521SVG DH4. I &1J5 pqN0 94) Page of6 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - High/Low Boilers - "CL? Like" 1 DATA VALIDATION: TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS 3 CLvl Project Name: Et ety ii6Nmcr'Q, SI/Wae ~r- Lab ID: N973 &5 Report No: Number and Type ofSamples: Special Instructions: W~C I) Holding Times Analysis Date Field Date I Extraction Date Gasoline IDiesel Comments Sample Na. Matrix i Coliected IPrps'n IGasoline i Dienel_ X)OOX wc4e-r1995?, T~W 7~2o9S% '4t795r7/209/f 7/Z r.: t4210017 1 t~~jou~~I I Iq 7 I o 72 o~~3i I 1Zvi72 A 2 ~ - J ill~~?,D&r6-4 _ Recomended Action:rreftI 4 : - Rciwi~Da tIt /%ACauewDate: '7 dtke - atc Total Petroleum Hydrocarnons - Higri/LOW boliers - "ULt Like" rage II) Cal~ibration (mOii=tMosdcM~wubC~jbt) 1. Calculation Check - Mean VRF gasalinelow, diesel/high) with ICalibration GC Selected Mean Agree Date Ref. ID Matrix Corn oud RF Lab Report? 2. Calculation Check - %RSD ______Calibration tiC Agree with Date In Compound %RSD Lab Report? B) Continuingq Calibration 1. Calculation Check -%D ____(gasoline/low- diesel/hishJ with Standard tiC Calibration Agree Filename Ref. ID Date Corpond %D Report? Recommended Action: W, mc,4{trtdeJ4 rQittples run prIror 4tcCCU'LVh 17c7.g, vL4 Rneied Ey~aU.44$1 - IZ isOA Concurmencu/Daht Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons -High/Low.Boilers - "CLP Like" Page of III) Blanks 1. Form IVpresent? 2. Method blank(s) reported for each matrix, GO system, or extraction batch as appropriate? V 3.Any contaminants detected? NQ (If yes then list) Blank ID Compound/Concentration (specify units) 4. Any contaminants detected in FB or ER samples? MO (Ifryes then list) Sample Date ID Collected Compound(s)/Concentratian(s) -specify units Nate: DO NOT list compounds adjusted to 'ND based on associated lab blank contamination in this section. Recommended Action: A) Number of pairs analyzed: ____ I______Matrix: -soil (gas) water (gas) soil ~(diesel)~ water (diesel) Frequency: __ _ t__ 5 ______ B) Form 1ll(s) present?4~. Result entries agree with raw data?V C) %R,RPD Calculations OK?4S Ino'explain:______leJ RnrnI OA c a a~~~t -~ ~T4-Ž Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons*- High/Low Boilers - "CLP Like" Pagel of JV)MatixSoie Mari SpkeDuplicate Pairs (continued) DI Alt %R, RPD's within limits? ye$ (If 'no thenli:)______Sample ID Copun d %R RPD Cmet Recommended Action: JI~tQ.)CLA) eJ V) Field Duplicates A) Are ari nallfield dup piatrs identifiable'? (Ifays then list: Original Duplicate Oiia ulct Matrix Sample No. Sample No. Matrix Sample No. SamI B) Overall frequency: C) Comments (Evaluate RPD's for positive paired analytes): VI) System Performance (Check for and explain the following) A) Abrupt baseline shift t kkit V ruk~OVcQa~+rAPoa. 4- B) High background or RTT shifts: kv q4~b 5~- C) Baseline rise at high temperature: 6 D)Extraneous peaks: es%42~Lct I eM 2) Loss of peak resolution: ~t _ _ _ _ _ F) Peak tailing or splitting: ______ Recommended Action: Reviewd By/Dart jL of A QA CmumDZt i t4 5 Total Petroleum Hydirocarbons- High/Low Boilers - 'CLP Like" Page of U VIII Compound Identification and Quantitation ______C heck if 'yesa Sample Compound and Result RT Calculatio Qualified Results (if different) Number - Reported Match OK Comments Recommended Action:& Ifa 4 e rL k% Jaceviewed By1M 2 9 QA Concumfncc/atc - a k Fotai reurnieum lyOrOC~arur'Q~l - flIlfl/LCW boiiers - u~Lr' LIKS roagefl of Reiee QAConwrwuce/Dat:•jl Analysis Data Shoot - IA Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract 409884 Cas No: EIELSON LabID: PIM 800 No: 19738 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 19991.5 Sample Vol (Ml): 5.0 Client Sample ID: H2001 Dilution Factor. 1.0 Data Sample Coliectat 071019 Data Exitracted: 07/20/9 Method: 8015 GRO Data Analyzed: 07/20W9 Date Sample Rcvdt 07/12/9 Unite: MGAI. Compound Name Result PQL Gasoline Range Organic. fb Ott~ 11 E 0.10 200009 Analysis Data Sheet - 1A Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract: 40)9884 Cas No: EIELSON LablD: PIM SOG No: 19738 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 19991.5DL Sample Vol (ml): 5.0 Client Sample ID: H200I DL Dilution Factor 50.0 Dat. SampleCofl Acte: 07/09/95 Date Extracted: 07/23/95 Method: 8015 GAO Data Analyzed: 07/2125 Date Sample Rcvd: 07112195 Units: MG/L Compound Name Result POL Gasoline Range Organic& FZ0OC~3 i1/'ok 5.0 200 08 Analysis Data Sheet - 1A Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract, 409884 Ca"e No: EIELSON LabID: PIM SDG No: 19736 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 19990.7 Sample Vol (ml): 5.0 Client Sample ID: H2003 Diulutonr Factr 1.0 Dabe Sample Collected: 0791096 Date Extracted: 07121195 Method: 8015 GRO Date Analyzed: 07/21/95 Date Sample Rcvd: 07112)95 UnIts: MILt Compound Name Result PQL Gasoline Range Organics OD 0 ND/ 0.10 Zo0025 Analysis Data Sheet - IA Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract. 409884 Came No: EIELSON LabiD: PIM 800 No: 19738 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 19995.8 Sample Vol (ml): 5.0 Client Sample ID: H2006 Dilution Factor 1.0 Daft Sample Collented: 07/019 Date Extrncted: 07126195 Method: 801 6 GRO Oats Analyzed: 07(26/985 Oats Sample Rcvdt 07/12/96 UnIts: MGiL Compound Name Result PQL Gasoline Rang. Organic. N00W1 0.10 200032 Analysis Data Sheet - 1A Lab Name: PACE. INC. Contract 409884 Case No: EIELSON Labia: PIM SDG No: 19738 Mathi: Water Pace Sample ID: 19739.4 Sample Vol (ml): 5.0 Client Sample ID: H2007 Dilution Factor 1.0 Date Sample Caltectu 07107195 Date Extracted: 07120/9 Methodt 8015 GRO Date Analyzed: 0720196 Date Sample Rcvdt 07/10/9 Unite: MG/I Compound Name Result PCOL Gasoline Range Organics tOL 5-1 A E 0.10 200039 Analysis Data Sheet - 1A Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract 409884 Case No: EIELSON LAbID: PIM S00 No: 19738 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 19739.4DL Sample Vol (ml): 5.0 Client Sample ID: H20070L DIIUtUOU Factor 50.0 0ate Sample CQ1Wched 07/07195 Date Extracted: 07123195 Method: 801 5 GRO Date Analyzad: 07/23/98 Data Sample Rovd: 07110/95 Units: MG/i. Compound Name, Result PQL GasolineRange Organica 1/ 5.0 200047 Analysis Daba Sheet - 1A Lab Name: PACE. INC. Contract; 409884 Case No: EIELSON LabiD: PIM 800 No: 19738 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 19994.0 Sample Vol (ml): 5.0 Client Sample ID: H20l08 Dilutiorn Factor 1.0 Dabt Sample Collected: 07=0W9 Date Extracted: 07/20/95 Method: 801 5 GRO Date Analyzed: 07120/95 Date Sample Rcvd: 07/12195 UnIts: MG/I. Compound Name Result lPQL GasolinefRange Organics NtoOOUO '10 - 0.10 20 005 4 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - High/Law Boilers - 'CLP Like" Page-J of DATA VALIDATION: TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS Project same:Crjel~cJr Number. L1LC~gP1OCLeel7 Lab ID:2Z0T2 Report No: TV:~ Number and Tvpe of samples: 3 DC - Special Instructions: ( R I) Holding Times Field Date I Extraction Date Analysis Date Sample No. Matrix r Collected Pres'n i Gasoline i Diesel Gasoline I Diesel Comments HZOO 2 tsoaer <7/i-1qS-~O 1;l 95>i7131 A Hzol'-4 I I I ~~42DI-7I____ CIL __I ___ __-__ H201 q I -7/ =__-/ - /______ Ft 0Ze bL I 2__951_719_1______7 =___ NotlL ____- Recm1 ede Acti 0 ______20Zwe OA __ _ _ iotai retroieum niyorocaroons - flIgfl/LOW noiiers - ,tLY LIKe- Page A-z of II) Calibration I Initial Calibration 1. Calculation Check - Mean RAF (gasoline/low, diesel/high) (mfMIMl wwsomd Cralkzs Calibration GC Selected Mean }Agree wth Date Ref. ID Matrix Cornpound )k(RF ]Lab Report ? 2. Calculation Check - %RSD ______Calibration OC Agree with Date ID Compound %RSD Lab Report? /;A ~ 9~ 0 rO Recommended Action: B) Continuing Calibration 1. Calculation Check - __D _____asolineflor, diesel/hi ___h___ Standard GC Calibration Agree with Filename Ref. ID Date Cornound 960 Report? tE___ _ ~/*e o 7/2tQ<4pT- tO1D ____> Recommended Action: Rmew.ed 3y/Da ui9&4ytA9/9< QA Concurreaceiflte: SIK nn - 3 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - High/Low Boilers - "CLP Like" Page of Ill) Blanks 1~oj~ 1. Form IV present? ______2. Method blank(s) reported for each matrix, GO system, or extraction batch as appropriate? /eJ 3. Mny contaminants detected? Aj (If lyest then list) Blank ID ompound/Concentration (specify units) 4. Any contaminants detected in FB or ER samples? A4A (If yesO then list) Sample Date, ID oletd ~Cornound s /Concentrations _spe- f units Note: DO NOT list compounds adjusted to ?4D6 based an associated lab blank contamination in this section. Recommended Action: IV) Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicate Pairs A) Number of pairs analyzed: ____ I______Matrix sail (gas) water (gas) soil (diesel) water (diesel) Frequenc B) Form Ill(s) present3 Result entries agree with raw data?.4L C) %R,RPD Calculations OK?.)i.P 5 if *no' explain: . .______Revewe By/ate U OACCm=V093e/D2Z..~& ~ RnLc3 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - High/Low Boilers - "CLP Like" Pagej of IV) Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicate Pairs (continued) 0) All %R,RPD's within limits? (If(IOna then lit:) ______Sample ID Compound %R RPD Comments Recommended Action: khueLAl&e V) Field Duplicates A) Are original/field duplict pairs identfifablettŽ (Ifryesr then fs: Matrix Sample No. Sam it No. Matix Sample No. Sample Ne-- B) Overall frequency: M C) Comments (Evaluate RPD'sf tv.paired analytes): VI) System Performance (Check for and explain the following) A) Abrupt baseline shift ______B) High background or AT shifts: eJd &Nax- C) Baseline rise at high temperature: ''V/ D) Extraneous peaks:s E) Loss of peak resolution: V a' F) Peak tailing or splitting: ______ IRecommended Action: 442 Reseed By/Acx[CQACOI~2gk,, Iotai raucieurn nyarocaruurib- flIyfl/LUW ooiiers - iLnLr LIKe raged CT VII) Compound Identification and Quantitation ______C h ec k 'ye s' ______Sample Compound and Resul RT Calculatia Qualified Results (if different) Number Repored Match OK Comments 4ZO/ (40 OM A I ".Xrrof /W F*9-D/0Y L CP2.D I y. tWL P- JI.1 2.L C-G 0 10 it -______A_ J4)C( 7 C4 o 'Ag IL ____ Ao) 1-#2-0170L go 11.0lt(ilwo ~4 2ojg9 -9 0 a23n, t______ 44 ___a 600&- 3.7 M_ _ 4-Lt 14202.z0 DL~ &0 :3.VD tjt A trrogplt 4W~X~dl". RecomendedActio:#W [{2oclq DL. Pi'; fI~,,q ~tnw ByID4a t{ 4 tA a ~2 QA ComflCU( !IWDIWŽL 9Ls K T £~e~ k I uLOII WuwvU I IlI lI 17 1 - I*I f WI, Q - ' ' * racyu r ~Or Vill) Overall Assessment' 41/1~euJ-k~~ri;ezw~~# ctcsr~9~tk4J Pn/etJ Sryrq4oe .Rev,.ncd ByDa:? QA Co £25~ Analysis Data Sheet - IA Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract: 409884 Case No: EIELSON LablO: PIM SDG No: 20521 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 20718.7 Sample Vol (MI); 5.0 ClIent Sample ID: H2002 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Oate Sample Collected. 07117195 Date Extracted: 07131195 Method: 8015 GRO Oats Analyzed: 07/31/95 Date Sample Rcvd: 07/18/95 Units: MG/I Compound Name Result PQL Gasoline Range Organics ploob6I'Y ND~" 0.10 200009 Analysis Daba Sheet - 1A Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract: 409884 Case No: EIELSON LabiD: PIM SDG No: 20521 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 207.19.5 Sample Vol (mi): 5.0 Client Sample ID: H2014 Dilution Factor. 1.0 Date Sample Collected: 07117195 Date Extracted: 07/31195 Method: 8015 GRO Date Analyzed: 07/31/95 Date Sample Rcvd: 07/18/9 Unite: MG/I. Compound Name Result PQIL Gasoline Range Organics 0002>- 6. 0.10 200 016 Analysis Data Sheet - 1A Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract: 409884 Case No: EIELSON LabID: PIM SDG No: 20521 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 20719.5DL Sample Vol (ml): 5.0 Client Sample ID: H20140L Dilution Factor: 5.0 Date Sample Collected: 07117/96 Date Extracted: 07/31/95 Method: 801 5 GRO Date Analyzed: 07131195 Date Sample Rcvd: 07/181SW Units: MG/I Compound Name Result POL Gasoline Range Organics ?2'00V3t 6.21/D ~ 0.50 200024 Analysis Data Shoot - IA Lab Name: PACE. INC. Contract, 409884 Case No: EIELSON LabiD: PIM BOG No: 20521 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 20720.9 Sample Vol (ml): 5.0 Client Sample ID: H2015 Dilution Factor 1.0 Date Sample Collected: 07117/96 Date Extracted: 07/31/95 Method: 8015 GRO Dabe Analyzed: 07/31/95 Oats Sample Rcvd: 07fl8/95 Units: MVG/I. Compound Name Result PQL Gasoline Range Organics 0 1/EIOL7 0.10 2Q O3 2 Analysis Data Sheet - 1A Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract 409884 Case No: EBELSON LabID: PIM SDG No: 20521 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 20720.QDL1 Sample Vol (ml): 5.0 Client Sample ID: H2015DL Dilution Factor 20.0 Date Sample Collected: 07/17/95 Date Extracted: 07131/95 Method: 8015 GRO Data Analyzed: 07/31/95 Date Sample Rcvd: 07/18195 Units: MGiL Compound Name Result PQIL Gasoline Range Organics p %OOON& 13 -D--t 2.0 200040 Analysis Data Shoot - IA Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract 409884 Case No: EIELSON LabiD: PIM S06 No: 20521 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 20721.7 Sample Vol (ml): 5.0 Client Sample ID: H2016 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Date Sample Collected: 07117195 Date Extracted: 07)31/95 Method: 801 5 GRO Date Analyzed: 07/31/95 Date Sample Rovd: 07/18/96 Units: MVGi.. Compound Name Result PQL Gasoline Range Organics 7t00S5• 0.49. 0.10 200048 .Analysis Data Sheet - 1A Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract, 409884 Case No: EIELSON LabiD: PIM SDG No: 20521 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 20722.5 Sample Vol (ml): 5.0 Client Sample ID: H12017 Dilution Factor 1.0 Date Sample Collected: 07117/96 Date Extracted: 07/31195 Method: 8015 GRO Data Analyzed: 07/31/95 Date Sample Rcvd: 07118195 Units: MG/I Compound Name Result PQL Gasoline Range Organicsa ~o00 9.07-E' 0.10 '20 0057 Analysis Data Sheet - 1A Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract, 409884 Case No: EIELSON LabiD: PIM SDG No: 20521 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 20722.SDL Sample Vol (ml): 5.0 ClIent Sample ID: H2017DL Dilution Factor 50.0 Date Sample Collected: 07117/95 Date Extracted: 07/31/95 Method: 8015 GRO Date Analyzed: 07/31/95 Daba Sample Royd: 07/18/95 Unite: MG/I. Compound Name Result PQL Gasoline Range Organics 2 0 1 0 i D 5.0 200065, Analysis Data Sheet - IA Lab Nmem: PACE. INC. Contract 409884 Case No: EIELSON LablO: PIM SDG No: 20521 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 20521.4 Sample Vol (ml): 5.0 Client Sample ID: H42018 Dilution Factor. 1.0 Date Sample Collected: 07/16/95 Date Extracted: 07121195 Method: 8015 GRO Date Analyzed: 07/21/95 Date Sample Rcvdt 07118/95 Units MVGA!. Compound Name Result PQL Gasoline Range Organics 2 )3-g 0.36- 0.10 200072 Analysis Data Shoot - 1A Lab Name: PACE. INC. Contract 409884 Case No: EIELSON LabiD: PIM SDG No: 20521 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 20522.2 Sample Vol (ml): 5.0 Client Sample ID: H2019 Dilution Factor. 1.0 Date Sample Collectdt 07116W9 Date Extracted: 07120195 Method: 80156 GRO Date Analyzed: 07120195 Dats Sample Royd: 07718196 Units: MVGA. Compound Name Result PQL Gasoline Range Organics 0.23' 0.10 200 080 Analysis Data Sheet - 1A Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract: 409884 Case No: EIELSON LabiD: PIM SDG No: 20521 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 20523.0 Sample Vol (ml): 5.0 Client Sample ID: H2020 Dilution Factor 1.0 Data Sample Collecte: 07116195 Date Extracted: 07/20/95 Method: 8015 GRO Data Analyzed: 07/20195 Date Sample Rcvt-07118/95 Units: MG/I Compound Name Resuft PQL Gasoline Range Organics p-oq3 3.7A/E 0.10 20 00 87 Analysis Data Sheet - `lA Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract 409884 Ca.e No: EIELSON LabID: PIM SDG No: 20521 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 20523.ODL Sample Vol (ml): 5.0 Client Sample ID: H202ODL Dilution Factor. 5.0 Date Sample Col lected: 07/11685 Data Extracted: 07/21/95 Method: 8015 GRO Date Analyzd: 07/21/95 Date Sample Rcvd: 07/18/96 Units: MG/L Compound Name Result POL Gasoline Range Organics ,2Dt 3.0 tX 0.50 1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0009 Pagejjof Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - High/Low Boilers - 'CLIP Like" DATA VALIDATION: TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS Project Name: fl,eIct, 4P-6 Number L~c OC LevejlZ7h Lab1973 ID: & Report No: PLC Number and Typcf Ripes:5 Spedal !astruaicfs: Thk o I) Holding Times Field Date- I Extraction Date Annavis Date Comments Sample No. Matrix i Collected Presn i Gasoline iDiesel Gasoline DicstA 14C2Oo- 7/-/15 7// E(qS '712Vl L700 1 79971 I51 /-e/,r 7 L7 1-7/ ~~2 st I I ______I ]~Da______Rd SvImew I Total Petroleum riyurocaroons - fliyvII/L WllCliIVI - %s'LF L-IIcroez II) Calibration ," initial Calibration 1. Calculation Check - Mean ORF ieeliw e Igslneopad w a1ro) with ICalibration Selected Mean Agree ? Date Ref. IMatrix Compound %RF Lab Repart * 7=.-774T'9 .[e 7 7, ) ~~______54 - __ _ _ _ 2.Calculation Check - ______SD_ __ Calibration GCAgree with Date ID Compound %RSD Lab Report? Kft4PS'9ioO )9ZO j 12 v. [Recommended Action: I B) Continuing Calibration 1. Calculation Check* - ______asolinejlowr, diesel/high with Standard GC Calibration Agree Filename Ref. ID Date Compound %D Report? ,RecomendedAction: Rmeviwd By/Date: ij~k T ~ Q A C C m m u I & 4 ( i & ' Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - High/Low Boilers - "CLP Like" Page~ of 1. Form IVpresent? 2. Method blank(s) reported for each matrix, GO system, or extraction batch as appropriat6Ve? 3. Any contaminants detected? }~f (If We then list) Blank ID Compound/Conlcentrationl (specify units) 4. Any contaminants detected in FB or ER samples? .&±- (If Oyas then list) Sample Date ID Collected Compound(s)/Concentration(s) - specify units Nate: DO NOT list compounds adjusted to ND based an associated lab blank contatmination in this section. Recommended Action: f~~~t d IV) Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicate Pairs I A) Number of pairs analyzed: ______Matrix: soil (gas) water (gas) soil ~(diesel)~ water (diesel) B) Form Ill(s) present32 Result entries agree with raw cdata?.4LJ t)%R, RPD Calculations OK? \41. If 'no' explain: ReviewedB slzs/qr Q A ZVn~w Z 14g Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - High/Law Boilers - "CLP Like' Page ... of• iv'Spke Mari Mtri SpkeDuplicate Pairs (continued) 0Al %RRP D's within limits? yVe5 (If~na. then l~ist:) ______Sample ID Compound %R RPD Comments Recommended Action: V) Field Duplicates A) Are ori inaltfield duplicate pairs identifiable? (If W then lkt: OriginalDuplicate ~~~~~~Original Duplicate Matrix Sample No. Sample No. Maimh Sample No. Sample No. B) Overall frequency: C) Comments (Evaluate RPD's for positive paired analytes): VI) System Performance (Check for and explain the following) A) Abrupt baseline shift \les 5q;.~s,th/I&CEntao/w?4jf4d B) High background or FIT shifts: a; /~ C) Baseline rise at high temperature: 7eS& D) Extraneous peaks: E) Loss of peak resolution: /VD______F)Peak tailing or splitti.g: A/C Recommended Action: 4ure Reviewed By/Dir /kW&& I AccunmXj& A . s u Total Petroleum tiyarocafflons- riign/LOW OUIM11b - ~,L LIKU ry- VII) Compound Identification and Quantitation Check if Eyes' Sample Compound and Result RT lCalculatioa Qualified Results (if different) Number Reported ac OK ~ Comments 13 0 .C~I 4t _ _ j ftkata I -Ao i-07DL- DZ K$- A a7 "Al.,n1 ~ ig d U ~ f5 t) Sv _LI _____w'k9 a Recommended Adtios: a~lwByfatew QA Concurrncc/Datye 4 eu~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - , I owi rwuurnui II nyui w .a. - * ., L ,ww VIII) Overall Assessment AU 5a&yLQ. caulk are cc9-jJds 4LQ ' 4K dJKt+fov scuiyyvatt/A p pj 0-FiA crtst( 54t/& rasut/$. N Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - 1A Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract: 409884 Ca" No: EIELSON LabiD: PIM SDG No: 19736 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 19991.5 Sample Vol (ml): 250.0 Client Sample ID: H12001 Dilution Factor. 1.0 Date Sample Collected: 07/09/98 Dabe Extracted: 07114195 Method: 80156 CR0 Dabe Analyzed: 07/29195 Date Sample Rcvd: 07112/95 Units: MGAI. Compound Name - Reauft /PQL Diesel Range Organics 1%oo qO 4.5 V 0.40 300008 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - IA Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract 409884 Case No: ElELSON LabID: PIM SDG) No: 19736 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 19990.7 Sample Vol (ml): 250.0 Client Sample ID: H20033 Dilution Factor 1.0 Date Sample Collected: 07A)9/9 Date Extracted: 07/1/95 Methodt 8015 DRO Date Analyzed: 0729/95 Dabe Sample Rcvd: 07112195 Units: MVG/I. Compound Name Result PQL Diesel Range Organics i¶5 ND 0.40 N~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - IA Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract 409884 Case No: EIELSON LabID: PIM 800 No: 19138 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 19995.8 Sample Vol (ml): 250.0 Client Sample ID: H2006 Dilution Factor 1.0 Date Sample Collected: 07109195 Date Extracted: 07/14495 Method: 8015 DRO Date Analyzed: 07/29/95 Date Sample Rcvd: 07112/95 Unftb MG/I. Compound Name Result POL Diesel Range Organics 0 ND 0.40 I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - 1A Lab Name: PACE. INC. Contract 409884 Case No: EraLSON LablO: PIM SDG No: 16738 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 19739.4 Sample Vol (ml): 250.0 Client Sample ID: H2007 Dilution Factor 1.0 Dat. Sample Colleieta 07/07196 Date Extracted: 07/14/95 Method: 8015 DRO Date Analyzed: 07129/95 Date Sample Rcvd: 07/10/95 Units: MVGA. Compound Name Result / QL Diesel Range Organics 2e' g f)v~ .04 3000 22 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - IA Lab Name: PACE. INC. Contract. 409884 Case No: EIELSON LablO: PIM S00 No: 19738 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 19739.40L Sample Vol (ml): 250.0 Client Sample ID: H20070L Dilution Factor. 10.0 Oeta Samp#. Colnteod: 07/07/96 Date Extracted: 07114/95 Method. 8015 DRO Date Analyzed: 07/29/95 Oats Sample Rcvd: 07110/95 Units: MGrL Compound Name Result POL Diesel Rang. Organi 250,/0 4.0 300028 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - 1A Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract: 409884 Case No: EIELSON LablO: PIM SDG No: 19736 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 19994.0 Sample Vol (ml): 250.0 Client Sample ID: H2008 Dilution Factor 1.0 Date Sample Collected:I 07/09/95 Date Extracted: 07/14495 Method: 801 5 DRO Date AnalYzedl: 07/29195 Date Sample Rcvd: 07112195 Units: MG/L Compound Name Result PQL, Diesel Range Organicsa-Ouv 4.8/ 0.40 300034 Tctai Petroleum Hydrocarbons - High/Low Boilers - "CLP Like" Page:I of6 DATA VALIDATION: TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS Project NarnmCejelokAPS Number. 07959' QC Level: h Lab ID:2O02 I Report No: Number and Type of Samples: sbWa V- Spedial Instrctions: 1k 1)Holding Times Field Date I Extraction Date Analysis Date Sample No. Matrix Collected Pres'n i Gasoline Diesel Gasoline I Diesel COMMMEns ),D01 wck - i7/17 71 30/,i A20 7 _ Notm: Recommended Action: Rmewews Bv/4fi1bvrt /rb OA ConaurrncsDate: tiL 4 k~~~~~~~z,4jL,q V~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Total Petroleum Hyarocaroons - HlgnVLOW boilers - 1ULI' Lxe" Pages) ofj 11) Calibration A)Initial Calibration 1. Calculation Check - Mean RRF (gasoline/low; diesel/high) (minimum I wompcwd pcrelibno,=) Calibration OC Selected Mean Agree with Date Ref. ID Matrix Compound RRF Lab Repart? loq __~ *ffp-o Nct4-ee ~DeQ st 2. Calculation Check - %RSD ______Calibration QC Agree with Date ID Comnpound %RSD Lab Report? U ii ~~~~M42C fl 2 Recommended Action: B) Continuingi Calibration 1. Calculation Check - ______(gasolineflow- diesel/higjh______Standard OC Calibration Agree with ,FienmeRef. ID Date Compound %DRepart? W41*40 1 ____ /2 (?S o e Recommcndcd Action: ~Ak&e dvdrJd Revie~wed y/fl.te::1/:;?kASW V 2yq GA Concurrac/flaae I Rc~,o Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - High/Low Boilers - 'CLP Like" Pages~- of Ill) Blanks4. 1. Form IVpresent? A 2. Method blank(s) reported for each matrix, GO system, or extraction batch as appropriate? \t 3. Any contaminants detected? AL.(If 'yes" then list) Blank ID CompoundiConcentration (specify units) 4. Any contaminants detected in FB or ER samples? 10~ (If'yes' then list) Sample Date ID Collected Compound(s)/Concentration(s) - specify units Note: DO NOT list compounds adjusted to *ND" based on associated lab blank contamination in this section. Recommended Action: &to rtgcrc IV) Matrix Spike / Matrix Spike Duplicate Pairs A) Number of pairs analyzed: ______Matrix: soil (as) water (as) sail (diesel) water (diesel) Frequency: ______ B) Form Ill(s) present'?.S4<~Result entries agree with raw data? C)%R, RPD Calculations OK? yJ If'no" explain: . .7 Reie Byawn&4MrtVy- ~/2/9 QA CbnCmren=Da7e--j4§i 4 W4b k rotal Petroleum Hydrocarbons - High/Low Boilers - "CLP Like" Page 4 of IlV) Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicate Pairs (continued) 0) All %R, RPD's within limits? W3 (If wnoN then Uist:) ______SampleI ID Cornpound %R RPD Comments Recommended Action: 4 VI Field Duplicates A) Are oni nal/field dluplict pairs identifiable?4 (If *yesm then listj _____ OriginalDuplicate ~~~~~~Original Duplicate Matrix Sample No. Sam IcN.Matrix Sample No. Sa B)Overall frequency: 4 C) Comments (Evaluate RPD's for positive paired analytes): VI) System Performance (Check for and explain the following) A) Abrupt baseline shift: \/eS, bH4ktA4/ W,-e 4 l4b~ tyci z0er~rs-e B) High background or RT shifts: kj,~ kdO~~~e~ne C) Baseline rise at high temperature: /pej1QjQAQ[. 0) Extraneous peaks: 'Md E) Loss of peak resolution: ~/ F)Peak tailing or splitting: Recommended Action /, 'gwrd ReWVWQA~ycncuntnce/Datr QAACa VI U ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Re.nio2.4 1 I WLOI I CUVICVIi I I IY~'i. WVIJ'J ' 0I I II* I/VtVV LVIWIIC a - ,JlI LIInC ~ odr VII) Compound Identification and Quantitatian ______C heck if 'yes' ______Sample Compound and Result RT Calculatio Qualified Results (if different) Number Reported Match OK Comments ~¾-ce5~ ik 6.9I m t Recommended Action: ;Reime~y/ateAL4 XIqlq5- QA Concurrence/DahzZ~4 ;R~~~~~~~~~~iewedBy/Date~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- I VSLO'- - .'d* .ltA .I* IS I-V15W LJ5QDSIIQ I - 1 i-n rdye k~ or ViII) Overall Assessment~ /7116aty/tres tre6+ OCtcceba/e an{ wy u~5J t(4Ieo ~d RvvirwedBy/Da 9/9 < QA (0024emt' Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - 1A Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract. 409884 Case No: EIELSON LabID: PIM SDG No: 20521 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 20718.7 Sample Vol (ml): 210.0 Client Sample ID: H2002 Dilution Factor 1.0 Date Sample Collected: 07/17/95 Date Extracted: 07/23/96 Method: 8015 DRO Date Analyzed: 07/30/95 Date Sample Rcvd: 07/18195 Units: MGIL Compound Name Result POL Diesel Range Organics DI/04 CABS 30 0 07 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - 1A Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract: 409884 Case No: EIELSON LabiD: PIM SDG No: 20521 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 20719.5 Sample Vol (ml): 260.0 Client Sample ID: H2014 Dilution Factor 1.0 Date Sample Collected: 07/17/95 Date Extracted: 07/23/95 Method: 8015 DRO Data Analyzed: 07/30/95 Date Sample Rcvd: 07/19/95 Units: MGIL Compound Name Result POL Diesel Range Organics 0.56 0.38 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - 1A Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract: 409884 Case No: EIELSON Labllo: PIM SDG No: 20521 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 20720.9 Sample Vol (ml): 260.0 Client Sample ID: H2015 Dilution Factor. 1.0 Date Sample Collected: 07117/95 Date Extracted: 07/23/95 Method: 8015 CR0 Date Analyzed: 07/30/95 Date Sample Rcvd: 07/19/95 Units: MGIL Compound Name Result POL Diesel Range Organics 0.1/0.38 300 01 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - IA Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract: 409884 Case No: EIELSON LabiD: PIM SDG No: 20521 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 20721.7 Sam Ple Vol (ml): 270.0 Client Sample ID: H2016 Dilution Factor. 1.0 Date Sample Collected: 07/17/95 Date Extracted: 07/23/95 Method: 8015 DRO Date Analyzed: 07/30/95 Date Sample Rcvd: 07/19/95 Units: MG/I Compound Name Result PQL Oiesel Range Organics ~1-* ND./ 0.37 300023 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - 1A Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract: 409884 Case No: EIELSON LabiD: PIM SDG No: 20521 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 20722.5 Sample Vol (ml): 250.0 Client Sample ID: H2017 Dilution Factor 1.0 Date Sample Collected: 07117/95 Date Extracted: 07/23/95 Method: 8015 DRO Date Analyzed: 07/30/95 Dati Sample Rcvd: 07/19195 Units: MG/L Compound Name Result POL Diesel Range Organics 1.5 0.40 *~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~3O? Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - IA Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract: 409884 Case No: EBELSON LabND: PIM SDG No: 20521 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 20521.4 Sample Vol (ml): 270.0 Client Sample ID: H2018 Dilution Factor 1.0 Date Sample Collected: 07116195 Date Extracted: 07123195 Method: 8015 DRO Date Analyzed: 07/30/95 Date Sample Rcvd: 07/18/95 Units: MGIL Compound Name Result PQL Diesel Range O rganics 10AND/ 0.37 300033 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - 1A Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract: 409884 Case No: EIELSON LabID: PIM SDG No: 20521 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 20522.2 Sample Vol (ml): 280.0 Client Sample ID: H12019 Dilution Factor 1.0 Date Sample Collected: 07/16/95 Date Extracted: 07/23/95 Method: 8015 DOR Date Analyzed: 07/30/95 Date Sample Rcvd: 07/18/95 Units: MGIL Compound Name Result POL Diesel Range Organics Q~b~0½9 ND 70.36 30 0037 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - IA Lab Name: PACE, INC. Contract: 409884 Case No: EIELSON LabiD: PIM SDG No: 20521 Matrix: Water Pace Sample ID: 20523.0 Sample Vol (ml): 255.0 Client Sample ID: H2020 Dilution Factor. 1.0 Date Sample collected: 07/16195 Date Extracted: 07/23/95 Method: 8015 CR0 Date Analyzed: 07/30/95 Date Sample Rcvd: 07/18/95 Units: MVG/L Compound Name Result PQL Diesel Range Organics 05/0.39 300 043 v)ganics by ______CLP Page' -of9 DATA VALIDATION: INORGANICS By ____ (CLP) Project Name: Cr(5tr r-F Number. gpcqL(. QC Level:XI 2 C Lab ID: 19573 A Report No: -T-r Number and Typeat Samples: / Special Instructions: I) Holdina Times Field IDate Preparation Analysis Comments SampleNa. Matrix Collected Pr.!esyerion Date Date (pH OK0 t.. .ZooI ~ ~~~~~~~~~I-i1i471l Yie- IZL( TFaiI Ak/4p'IJ4 10b7 I I-1±/~'~~~~~~~~11q ri____ 9O 04 7 11 J-7 ______ 142-013 _ _7_ _o_ _ _ _ :Recommended Action: 4/ovict Pxu I ed Rc%¶ewS 8v/Date: w qSQA ~cncwmM'nue qA44/grtt Ir"nrganics by ____ ~CLP Page~ of _ 11) Calibration A) Initial Calibration 1. Stanidard / Blank Check ______Calibration I11hL Run Standard Corr elation Date ID No. Levels Coefficient Commenn: - j cP-I OSL '717'N A/ 0.-7 -I---IoS/"J2s1 oI o.99 I ?2S$Oh1 t ,SQSrc 0I9 Is thie initial calibration present for every analysis date, element and instrument? ve-s jcomended Action: /okt &jred ¾J B) Initial arid Continuing Calibration Verification (Check % Recovery calculation, minimum 1ICV and I ccv per analysistpe Analysis Instument Run Run Concentration Percent ~TypeIEement ID No. ICV or CCV Date True Found Recovery ICcAICIUtA~n PZ2& I. _-TC 7/.,q/i,; § oo0 Y9gg7Y csr- ______no " -lJP- CccY- 1-ll~ 2r0'0 .2&/4 102.ISjT5 ICVpe~rmed andCCV fo every nalysi daean ns'met ys?9o7 Form(s) IIA present? '/Q ICV and CCV data entered agrne with raw data.? 49Ž. (If'no'cxplaan) ReviewedBIDWyinat QA cnm t_ of Irnorganics by ___ -CL? Page B) Calibration (continued) Recocmended Action: Ill) Blanks A) Is Farm Ill present ? 8) Result entries agree with raw data ?___ ______(If no' then explain) ______pQL- C) Any contamination or negative values found above the-eR~vt? 5(if -yes* then List.) Blank IInstrument Type of Concenmration ID ID AnlssCompound (specify unius) 9s.S. CrcB 7. 1 ______C!ciMM D) Any contaminants found above the CRDL in FB or ER samples?4/j (if yes then list) Sample j DateTyeoCmpud ID ICollected Analsis Concentration (spif unitsl Reomened Actiom Altp& (lr IV) ICP Interference Check Sample 'A) is Form IV present ?\ye1 8) Result entries agree with r taw e acicewesBy/Dasw"/9&tL z t/t4§r GACausbWtI4 IinorganiCs by - -CLP Pagej of 'IV) ICP Interference Check Sample (continued) C) Recoveries 80.120% of true value? 4VPS (If na' then fist:) Instrument I4 IL Filename ID %R IQualificationi Recommended Action: V) Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) A) IsForm VII present ?4L L. B)Result entries agree w~it raw data ? i. (if 'no' eplain.) 0) Results within control limits?4 (ifdt9o- then Wst) Instuiment Fiename ID ______QuU&ftcdon rRecommeded Action: VI) Duplicate Samole Analysis A) Is Form VI present ? 410 B) Result entries agree with raw data ? /e (If no* explain.) ______ C) Number of pairs analyzed: _____ Matrix: soil -7-41 water _ _ Frequency: __4 rw__ ___ 2c__ _ RenwsDy/AW 5 OAAamnam/DSW 1 norgariics by __ _CILP' Page of9 VI) Duplicate Sample Analysis (continued) D) Results with in control limits? (If nd'thenUst-) Sample Pair Instrument ID'S I ID Element IRPD ~4~) y lW.QL.2- P6 ~diij _____6___ Recommended Action:A SpkŽJ 1 l X 45rklskc 5a y~~~~cecm)~ +s ~ s4lo)>s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _Str(c lit %PPD 4rn dj; sp014d /eAd wai A¾49 a -b.+14t04f 9uAlf4y Cqy-ok r;tr* t4 'tO 9 L441;4zcQJ1KJLV~tt mpp- M 4-tA'feL kA4 gcecepijae AP4c~ t r.)Vtr tLS. Vil) Matrix Spike.Sample Analysis A) Is Form V present? 795 B)Result entries agree with raw data?_.Qt. (If Ono explain.) ______C) Are %Rcalculations 01K?__e_ 0) Number of spikes analyzed: _____ -1 Matte: soil watr _ __ Frequency: ______ E)[re % within limb? Ci (f n then Ist:) Sample Pakr Instrumst ID's ID Hoems: ___R F)Was a field blank (FS) used for spike analysis ?J~ Revnivew ByM"=J4&ty3/29 QA CoaDVAYMMO Q 44-5 Irnorganics by ___ CLP Page6ct Nil) Matrix Spike Sample Analysis (continued) Recammended Action: ViIl) Field Duplicates A) Are original/field duplicate pairs identifiable? Al(If 'yas then list.) 6) Overall frequency: C) Comments (Evaluate RPDusfor pos'' pairdanalytes): IX) ICP Serial Dilutions Do %Dcalculations agree with raw data? 4 Recommended Action: [A)J RMCVd~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Inorganics by _____CLP Page2jct9 -X) Furnace Atomic Absorption 00 Sample instrument % RSD* INumber ID Elmet or9CV _____ . CmmnR It/OW ,V~~~- Element__ i ot 7 ______~ ~ ~ Q ~~~Ijj 0744br 5 J I100.9 estRtA*pedQ ;L OD -7~_ _ _ _ _ 7, O' ~ j~o i2iZ~ ThT7 o-%Ps&S.aeP? E I09 7P¼+9 ______~A12%o 'U.V% esb~ S4AtkZPQ ______-Wo.7 Pb dwe rizy cr?. /7 ,,& di 2oc,3 ___,_ /__z__ I D;%/-q370 4 ______0 2oo _ o.c;0 / 02 f 09 Ža n C_ _ _ _ _ L 2 _ ; 3,.6 Z7 J L L .& 1A OD03 ______I S o . ______%a2 Y ______3_ *Na~~~~~~ OnlypflM mpnain maple imub.eZ pQ 1.- Was the Meftod of Standard Additons (MSA) usd 2. Were the samples run by MISA spiked at the appropriate leves? Recommended Action: ,Al Coahtr4IoAD wots irdk &fA ou~j keItg Ptr4brn^el pr)e*r 40 *Li_.MArn 'thret&b AMS k+41 res'd 4-y HZO~ 'la9t 4~ra s e;4bm,.s.IC II'f Rn~wsBwat /i'/s~ A~emnceDs}242k 2 ~k RCV~~~~~~~~~wed~~~~- of Inorganics by - CLP Page% XI)AnayteIdetifcaton nd uantitation Sample Ankaiyte and Calculation i Qualified Result (if different) Number Result Reported OK? Comments I 17001I alI- bk ____2_____I0/tPhb nI J)______t At. Pt ______4 ______~ u L P9,~ re a pe f D1 Jh'9 i WcccP dra 5he-Ax'- / ~- e______M to P6 }+4o 6ca~znoOct 6r1 PrkAi ______ue___e___r______Dr___ OA CCM______Pb91~ Irnorganics by ___ -CLP PageJa of XII) Overall Assessment 511v4~-1s.. 4d!lead se? 54 IL y2 o? os C444 result fl0 LP) 4, a~s reecor4t4 L-(e of-n~ reau, nis4 4 4 All r4-kerre/Ic are- pccepi4ataef RemwedBYMG.2/x- /OA CMcmnneiattVtt/ Lab Namne: PACE, INCORPORATED Contract 409884 Case No: EIELSON SOG: 19736 Inorganic Analysis Data Pace ID 100197378 Client ID TI1001 Collected 07/07/95 Received 07110195 WATER Analyte Result UNITS PCIL Dilution Date Time Prep LEAD (3O)OcV 3200O-' UG/L. 300 100 -07/21/95 14:50 07/18/95 s00008 Eielson Air Force Base Lab Name: PACE, INCORPORATED Contract 409884 Case No: EJELSON SOG: 19736 Inorganic Analysis Spike Results Pace ID lO0lgl'86 Client ID H2004 9gtoo&6 prooQsG Analyte Units Result Ms %REC MSD %REC MSTV Control limit %RPD LEAD UGA. 3.OOD-/ 11.485tW l114.9% 13.3 130.3%t 10.0 75-125%/ LEAD, DISSOLVED UIGA. < 7 3.000- 9.420k/ 94.2% ~ 13.36 133.6% - 10.0 75-125% N Spike recvety is outsidle control linft. USD450 RPD isoaid. wibd hikts *Semple concentraion exceeds spike level by a factor of kwror nmm 80 0 01 9 Eielson Air Force Base Lab Name: PACE, INCORPORATED Cantrad 409884 Case No: EIELSON S00: 19738 Inorganic Analysis Data Pace 10 100197394 Client ID H42007 Collected 07/07/95 Received 07/10/95 WATER Analyte Result UNITS PCOL Dilution Date Time Prep LEAD p ~' 5300" UG/L 600 20O ~07I21/95 ~15:01 0O7/18/~95 LEAD, DISSOLVED pq'~l 490 rLUGIL 150 50 7'07/21/95 17:15 07/18/95 80 0 010 Eielson Air Force Base Lab Name: PACE, INCORPORATED Contract 409684 Case No: EIELSON SDG: 19736 Inorganic Analysis Data Pace ID 100199907 Client ID H42003 Collected 07/09/95 Received 07/12/95 WATER Analyte Result UNITS PQL Dilution Date Time Prep LEAD q) IS< 3.OVw UGIL 3. 0 1 07/21/95 15:37 07/18/95 LEAD, DlSSOLVED~%'' OF 3.O UGh. 3. 0 1 07121195 19:35 07118a/95 800011 Eielson Air Force Base ab Name: PACE, INCORPORATED Contrad 409884 Case No: EIELSON SDG: 19736 Inorganic Analysis Data Pace ID 100199918 Client ID H2001 Collected 07/09/95 Received 07/12/95 WATER Analyte Result UNITS POL Dilution Date Time Prep LEAD plOD'A4 150we UIG/ 60 2 r0 1 /95 15:49 07/18/95 LEAD, DISSOLVED 99DO tbq 85 UG/L is 5-`07I21I95 19:40 07/18a/95 8001 Eielson Air Force Base Lab Name: PACE, INCORPORATED Contract 409884 Case No: EIELSON SDG: 19736 Inorganic Analysis Data Pace ID 100199940 Client ID H42008 Collected 07/09/95 Received 07/12/95 WATER Analyte Result UNITS PCQL Dilution Date Time Prep LEAD f 019 1 -~ UGIL 30 10 07/24/95 19:56 07/18/95 LEAD, DISSOLVED ~'0'0 S7 ' UGIL. is 5 07/21/95 19:58 07/18/95 800 01 3 Eielson Air Force Base Lab Name: PACE, INCORPORATED Contract 409884 Case No: EIELSON SDG: 19730 Inorganic Analysis Data Pace 1D 100199958 Mlient ID H2006 Collected 07/09/95 Received 07/12/95 WATER Analyte Result UNITS POL Dilution Date Time Prep LEAD< 3.0Ye/poooi'Vr UGIL 3. 0 1 07/21/95 16:12 07/18/95 LEAD, DISSOLVED < 3.O%/$o0I11 UGIL 3. 0 1 0721/95 20:22 07/18/95 N~~~~~~~~~~ )~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Elelson Air Force Base Lab Namne: PACE, INCORPORATED Contract 40988 Case No: EIELSON SOG: 19736 Inorganic Analysis Data Pace ID 100199974 Client ID H42005 Collected 07/09/95 Received 07/12/95 WATER Analyte Result UNITS POL Dilution Date Time Prep CALCIUM 48000OZ UGIL 40 1 07/24/95 10:05 07/21/95 IRON 5200"' UG/L. 20 1 07/24/95 10:05 07/21195 MAGNESIUM 310O00-'~ US/L 30 1 07/24/95 10:05 07/21/95 MANGANESE 1.2o00 US/IL 5.0 1 07/24/95 10:05 07121/95 POTASSIUM 3000-/ UG/I. 600 1 07/24/98 10:05 0721/95 SODIUM 5000k UGJL. 40 1 07/24195 10:05 0721195 BROMIDE ftt'0.060" MG/L. 0.060 1 07/24/95 18:00 - CHLORIDE ~~2.1-w MG/I. 1.0 1 07/24/95 18:00 - CHLORIDE 13 -'MG/IL 1.0 1 07/24/95 18:00 - ALKALINITY 160w' MG/IL 5.0 1 07/15/95 15:15 - HARDNESS Iv 160000 UG/I.L'10 1 07/31/95 15:33- JIDE) pbKA < 0.407 MG/I. 0.40 AA 1 07/14/95 15:20 - TOTALDISS~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~OLVDOCD i 200 ""MG/I. 10 1 07/13/95 8:50 SOLIDS 80 00 1 Eielson Air Force Base Lab Name: PACE, INCORPORATED Contract 409884 Cane No: EIELSON SDG: 19736 Inorganic Analysis Data Pace ID 100200379 Client ID H42010 Collected 07/11/95 Received 07/13/95 WATER Analyte Result UNITS PQL Dilution Date Time Prep LEAD rgpq~< 3 .0 UG/L 3.0 1 07/21195 15:13 07/18/95 LEAD;, DISSOLVEDpSooibI < 3.0 UG/I. 3.0 1 07/21/95 19:23 07/18/95 8 00 016 Elelson Air Force Base Lab Name: PACE, INCORPORATED Contract 409884 Case NO: EIELSON SDG: 19736 Inorganic Analysis Data Pace ID 100200689 Client ID H2013 Collected 07/10/95 Received 07/12/95 WATER Analyte Result, UNITS PQL Dilution Date Time Prep LEAD 3.0' %oooi UIG/L 3.0 1 07/21/95 16:35 07/18/95 LEAD,DISSOLVED U3Gr"3.0 1 07/21/95 20:34 07/181J95 800 01 7 Eielson Air Force Base Lab Name: PACEf, INCORPORATED Contract 409884 Case No: EIELSON SOG: 19736 Inorganic Analysis Data Pace ID 100200697 Client ID H42012 Collected 07110/95 Received 07/12/95 WATER Analyte Result UNITS PQIL Dilution Date Time Prep LEAD 3.6v'p¶0 0 091 US/I. 3.0 1 07/21/95 16:52 07/18/95 LEAD, DISSOLVED Cr 3 )w - US/I. 3.0 1 07121/95 20:48 07/18/9 8 0 00138 'organics by ____ CLP Pagejcof' DATA VALIDATION: INORGANICS BY ____(CLP) Projc~t NaMe: PE/s &Number gos' QC Level:=(1 Lab ID: k'S -DY3 1q Report No: Number and Type of Samples: Special Instructions: cA( 4cIt*Ja 4 4 1)Holdinga Times I Field Date Preparation Analysi Comments Sample No. Matrix Collected Preservation IDate Date (pH OK, etc...) F I vvc4e1< 2 ( 0* 747W ( ______/2OC34F I A $03 U F 7/7/__ __ U.2CO07 6t :Recommended Action: Raewewd nV/ma1Vr/jA t( QAMCcacnnaflw i ~C- j Inorganics by ____- CLP Page~ t 11) Calibration A) Initial Calibration 1. Standard! Blank Check ______Calibration Inst. Run Standard C-orrfelation Date ID No. Levels Coefficient comments -?//9 - FiL.. C,0 t., 1 0. 9? c~rCW'ec&r ' Is the initial calibration present for every analysis date, element and ins~ment? v~ eccomendcd Action: B) Initial and Continuing Calibration Verification (Check 91 Recovery calculation mInimum 1 ICV and 1 CCV per analysis type) Analysis Instrument Ran Run Concentration Percent Tp/lemient ID NO. ICy or CCV Date True Found Recovery ~~ JXV~~T 72 7 / s 1. 97 Ph Li5- a F/. CC V 7/2 / /f _ 9___r ______ ICV and CCV performed for every analysis date and instrument? 4 Form(s) IIA present? iLi ICV and CCV data entered agree with raw data-? (IWno 'exp____ Rtened Dy~w. 4 /8T OAAcnAiA ~ 4~ Inorganics by ___- CL? Pages Of II B) Calibration (continued) Rccocmended Action:, Ill) Blanks A) Is Form Ill present4 ? ; B) Result entries agree with raw data (If no then explain) ______ C)Any contaminationor negative values found above the CRDL? //0 (If"Yes thenulst.) Blank Instumen TueIa Concentration ID ID Analysi Comp)ound (pyuis D) Any contaminants found above the CROL in F8 or ER samples?&6 ______(If 'yes then List:)______Sample [ Data Type of Compound/ I D ICollected Analysis Concentration (specify unita) Recommended Actioe: IV) ICP Interference Check Sample A) Is Form IVpresent ?.44± B) Result entries agree with raw ta?42 Re&-WedSBy/Datr 4 ib y (/ QACactea~ Iinorganics by ___ CLP Pages at 07 IV) lOP Interference Check Sample (continued C) Recoveries 80-1120% of true value? -s: (I no he Instrument Y I a hnls: Fiename lID %R Qualification IRecommended Action: V) Laboratory Control Sample (LOS) A) Is Form VII present B) Result entries agree with raw data ?i~ (if Ono, explain.)/ C) Results within control limitsf {lnoo then lbt) Instrument Filenarne ID %R___ Qualiftatdon Recommended Action: VI) Duplicate Sample Analysis A) Is Form VI present e B) Result entries agree with raw data ? 41 (If *no, explain.) ______ C) Number of pairs analyzed: _____ Matrix: soil water ___ Frequency: ______I Reviewsd By/Date- OA 4CA~erAmciLaw8 Inorganics by ___ -CLP' Pagesjjoft1 VI) Duplicate Samole Analysis (continued) 9) esltswith in control limits? ____ (If 'no then als) Sample Fair Instrmn ID's IDen Element RPD Recommended Action: ,VII) Matrix Spike Sample Analysis A) Is Form V present? B)Result entries agree with raw data'?4L( (If nzo* explain.) ______7______C) Are %Rcalculations OK?_gl9 D) Number of spikes analyzed: ______ Matrk: soil water _ __ Frequency, __ J.-______ E) Are %Rwithin limb? ceIfrno* then litt) Sample Fair instrument ID's ID Element %R___ F)Was a field blank (FB) used for spike analysis ? 9O Rceyndw flyIDst 44: q/&c OAMCncisc t 4 9 '1 Iniorganics by ____-CLP Pae "7 VII) Matrix Spike Samole Analysis (continued) !Recammended Actioin: VIII) Field Duplicates A) Are original/field duplicate pairs identifiable? gr(Iyes then list:) B) Overall frequency: C) Comments ( Evaluate RPO's for positive paired analytes): IX) ICP Serial Dilutions Do %Dcalculations agre withi raw data? Recommended Action: Vo~ rQ/ctr'e4 4r {a~ Rnin.St 7 44•A~~~~~~c~~~rnrnn~~~~~ D~~~~~~~ThW9~~~~~~~t h w at ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e',s~~~~~onA..~~~ Iinorganics - by -CLP Page 2ott -X) Furnace Atomic Absorption OC Sample Enawamern %oRSD I Numbe ID Element 1 or CV 7Rcomments 1.Was the Method of Standard Additions (MSA) Used? ' 2. Were the samples run by MSA spiked at the appropriate levels? 4 Recoamcndcd Action: AR1(LJcM 4~ I> FI* (~14nK 4 Ratewed v/st4 &l Q COGM Inorgariics by ___ -CLp Page~1~C XI) Analyte Identification and Quantitation Sample Analyte and Calculation Qualified Result (if different) Number Result Reported OK?Coies I tfZCL ttPLt *Ph c'4 ___ __ Comments __ ___ Recommended Action: RcyewM DyADaA 44 4 ~9 QA CewMitate y-~ Inorganics by ___ -CLP Page~ of XII) Overall Assessment 415( •4- ccjAll~ er TraU tU, ZAt ttiSC 6t cZJ2rpr4 Rcykgmd OA ConcurreamOGICU SI~~~~~~~~~ COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report ;~~lient: International. Technology Corporation Service Request: K9504319 Project. Eielson AFhB I 409824 Date Collected: 7/9/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/13/95 Lead, Organic Prep Method: NONE Units: mg/L (ppm) Analysis Method: CALUFT Basis: NA Test Notes: Dilution Date Date Result Sample Name Lab Code MRL MIL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes H-2003-F K9504319-001 0.1 0.1 1 7/19/95 7/21/95 NDl - H2003-UTF K9504319-002 0.1 0.1 1 7/19/95 7/21/95 ND,- 112001 MSD-F K9504319-003 0.1 0.1 1 7/19/95 7/21/95 0 112001 MSD-UF K9504319-004 0.1 0.1 1 7/19/95 7/21/95 ND- H-2001 MS-F K9504319-005 0.1 0.1 1 7/19/95 7/21/95 ND- 112001 MS-UF KC95043I9-00 0.1 0,1 1 7119/95 7/21/95 ND- H12001-F K9504319-007 0.1 0.1 I 7/19/95 7/21/95 ND- H12001-UF K9504319-008 0.1 0.1 1 7/19/95 7/21/95 ND- H12008-F K9504319-009 0.1 0.1 1 7/19/95 7/21/95 ND," H12008-UF K9504319-010 0.1 0.1 1 7/19/95 7/21/95 NDx- H2008-F K9504319-011 0.1 0.1 1 7/19/95 7/21/95 ND/' y2008-UF K9504319-012 0.1 0. 1 7/19/95 7/21/95 NDl-' Method Blank K9504319-!vB 0.1 0.1 1 7/19/95 7/21/95 ND/ Approved By: c f .Date: 043I9ICPEKAI -.Mpll itisrn Paw N... COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Analytical Report Aent: International Technology Corporation Service Request: K(9504320 Project. Eielson AFB I if 409884 Date Collected: 7/7/95 Sample Matrix: Water Date Received: 7/13/95 Lead, Organic Prep Method: NONE Units: m&/I. (ppm) Analysis Method: CALUMT Basis: NA Test Notes: Dilution Date Date Result Sample Name Lab Code MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Result Notes TIQOI K(9504320-001 0.1 0.1 1 .7119/95 7/21/95 ND - ' H2007-UF K(9504320-002 0.1 0.1 1 7/19/95 7/21/95 0.4 - Hf2007-F K(9504320-003 0.1 0.1 1 7/19/95 7/21/95 ND Method Blank K(9504320-MB 0.1 0.1 1 7/19/95 7/21/95 ND)~ p~l Approved By: cr -Date: lAmc.03 169 W32OtEAB-Su.* 7/2&$3 PqcNo. Pages of * rganucs by ____ -CLIP DATA VALIDATION: INORGANICS BY ____(CLP) Project Name: Ui'e (5c txA -I Number. qQ503y OCLevelfTIL Lab ID: ;L 0• %~I Report No: ZI- Number and Type of Samples: w e Special InstmuCUOlls: 41S/4 J,3~0bLJ ,te cc I) Holding Times Field Ma Date ftepmrto AnlComments Sample No. Mtrix Colleced Preservation Date Date (pH OK. etc...) _ _q5- i 5_ ___ P 1~ I D -2 _ iP X _ _7 I • - _ qccioo I ______ pqoq IVI_ ~Recommended Action