DOCSLIB.ORG

Some Principles of Stratification Author(S): Kingsley Davis and Wilbert E

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Some Principles of Stratification Author(S): Kingsley Davis and Wilbert E Some Principles of Stratification Author(s): Kingsley Davis and Wilbert E. Moore Source: American Sociological Review, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1944 Annual Meeting Papers (Apr., 1945), pp. 242-249 Published by: American Sociological Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2085643 Accessed: 30/09/2008 11:53 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=asa. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. American Sociological Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to American Sociological Review. http://www.jstor.org 242 AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICALREVIEW less wholesome than those of children in un- vantage of the child, for the new parent has broken homes. In some instances, the com- been able to enter into a more sympathetic ing of a step-parent has been to the ad- intimacy with the child than his own parent. SOME PRINCIPLES OF STRATIFICATION KINGSLEYDAVIS AND WILBERT E. MooRE PrincetonUniversity IN A PREVIOUS PAPER some conceptsfor carry different degrees of prestige, and quite handling the phenomena of social in- another to ask how certain individuals get equality were presented.' In the present into those positions. Although, as the argu- paper a further step in stratification theory ment will try to show, both questions are is undertaken-an attempt to show the re- related, it is essential to keep them separate lationship between stratification and the in our thinking. Most of the literature on rest of the social order.2 Starting from the stratification has tried to answer the second proposition that no society is "classless," or question (particularly with regard to the unstratified, an effort is made to explain, in ease or difficulty of mobility between strata) functional terms, the universal necessity without tackling the first. The first ques- which calls forth stratification in any social tion, however, is logically prior and, in the system. Next, an attempt is made to explain case of any particular individual or group, the roughly uniform distribution of prestige factually prior. as between the major types of positions in every society. Since, however, there occur THE FUNCTIONAL NECESSITY OF between one society and another great dif- STRATIFICATION ferences in the degree and kind of stratifi- cation, some attention is also given to the Curiously, however, the main functional of varieties of social inequality and the variable necessity explaining the universal presence factors that give rise to them. stratification is precisely the requirement moti- Clearly, the present task requires two dif- faced by any society of placing and structure. ferent lines of analysis-one to understand vating individuals in the social mechanism a society must the universal, the other to understand the As a functioning social variable features of stratification. Naturally somehow distribute its members in the each line of inquiry aids the other and is positions and induce them to perform con- indispensable, and in the treatment that duties of these positions. It must thus cern motivation at two different follows the two will be interwoven, although, itself with proper individuals because of space limitations, the emphasis levels: to instill in the once will be on the universals. the desire to fill certain positions, and, desire to perform the Throughout, it will be necessary to keep in these positions, the in mind one thing-namely, that the discus- duties attached to them. Even though the static in sion relates to the system of positions, not social order may be relatively of me- to the individuals occupying those positions. form, there is a continuous process tabolism as new individuals are born into it, It is one thing to ask why differentpositions shift with age, and die off. Their absorption Kingsley Davis, "A Conceptual Analysis of into the positional system must somehow be Stratification," American Sociological Review. 7: arranged and motivated. This is true whether 309-321, June, 1942. 'The writers regret (and beg indulgence) that the system is competitive or non-competi- the present essay, a condensationof a longer study, tive. A competitive system gives greater covers so much in such short space that adequate importance to the motivation to achieve evidence and qualificationcannot be given and that positions, whereas a non-competitive system as a result what is actually very tentative is pre- sented in an unfortunately dogmatic manner. gives perhaps greater importance to the mo- SOME PRINCIPLES OF STRATIFICATION 243 tivation to perform the duties of the posi- and perquisites that are not essential to the tions; but in any system both types of mo- function of the position and have only an tivation are required. indirect and symbolic connection with its If the duties associated with the various duties, but which still may be of considerable positions were all equally pleasant to the importance in inducing people to seek the human organism, all equally important to positions and fulfil the essential duties. societal survival, and all equally in need of If the rights and perquisites of different the same ability or talent, it would make positions in a society must be unequal, then no difference who got into which positions, the society must be stratified, because that and the problem of social placement would is precisely what stratification means. Social be greatly reduced. But actually it does make inequality is thus an unconsciously evolved a great deal of differencewho gets into which device by which societies insure that the most positions, not only because some positions important positions are conscientiously filled are inherently more agreeable than others, by the most qualified persons. Hence every but also because some require special talents society, no matter how simple or complex, or training and some are functionally more must differentiate persons in terms of both important than others. Also, it is essential prestige and esteem, and must therefore that the duties of the positions be performed possess a certain amount of institutionalized with the diligence that their importance re- inequality. quires. Inevitably, then, a society must have, It does not follow that the amount or first, some kind of rewards that it can use as type of inequality need be the same in all inducements, and, second, some way of dis- societies. This is largerly a function of tributing these rewards differentially accord- factors that will be discussed presently. ing to positions. The rewards and their dis- tribution become a part of the social order, THE TWO DETERMINANTS OF and thus give rise to stratification. POSITIONAL RANK One may ask what kind of rewards a society has at its disposal in distributing its Granting the general function that in- personnel and securing essential services. It equality subserves, one can specify the two has, first of all, the things that contribute factors that determine the relative rank of to sustenance and comfort. It has, second, the different positions. In general those positions things that contribute to humor and diver- convey the best reward, and hence have the sion. And it has, finally, the things that highest rank, which (a) have the greatest contribute to self respect and ego expansion. importance for the society and (b) require The last, because of the peculiarly social the greatest training or talent. The first character of the self, is largerly a function factor concerns function and is a matter of of the opinion of others, but it nonetheless relative significance; the second concerns ranks in importance with the first two. In means and is a matter of scarcity. any social system all three kinds of rewards Differential Functional Importance. Actu- must be dispensed differentially according ally a society does not need to reward to positions. positions in proportion to their functional In a sense the rewards are "built into" the importance. It merely needs to give sufficient position. They consist in the "rights" as- reward to them to insure that they will be sociated with the position, plus what may filled competently. In other words, it must be called its accompaniments or perquisites. see that less essential positions do not com- Often the rights, and sometimes the accom- pete successfully with more essential ones. paniments, are functionally related to the If a position is easily filled, it need not be duties of the position. (Rights as viewed by heavily rewarded,even though important. On the incumbent are usually duties as viewed the other hand, if it is important but hard by other members of the community.) How- to fill, the reward must be high enough to ever, there may be a host of subsidiary rights get it filled anyway. Functional importance 244 AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICALREVIEW is therefore a necessary but not a sufficient do with its duties. There may be, in fact, a cause of high rank being assigned to a virtually accidental relationship.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Centennial Bibliography on the History of American Sociology
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Sociology Department, Faculty Publications Sociology, Department of 2005 Centennial Bibliography On The iH story Of American Sociology Michael R. Hill [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub Part of the Family, Life Course, and Society Commons, and the Social Psychology and Interaction Commons Hill, Michael R., "Centennial Bibliography On The iH story Of American Sociology" (2005). Sociology Department, Faculty Publications. 348. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub/348 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Sociology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sociology Department, Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Hill, Michael R., (Compiler). 2005. Centennial Bibliography of the History of American Sociology. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association. CENTENNIAL BIBLIOGRAPHY ON THE HISTORY OF AMERICAN SOCIOLOGY Compiled by MICHAEL R. HILL Editor, Sociological Origins In consultation with the Centennial Bibliography Committee of the American Sociological Association Section on the History of Sociology: Brian P. Conway, Michael R. Hill (co-chair), Susan Hoecker-Drysdale (ex-officio), Jack Nusan Porter (co-chair), Pamela A. Roby, Kathleen Slobin, and Roberta Spalter-Roth. © 2005 American Sociological Association Washington, DC TABLE OF CONTENTS Note: Each part is separately paginated, with the number of pages in each part as indicated below in square brackets. The total page count for the entire file is 224 pages. To navigate within the document, please use navigation arrows and the Bookmark feature provided by Adobe Acrobat Reader.® Users may search this document by utilizing the “Find” command (typically located under the “Edit” tab on the Adobe Acrobat toolbar).
    [Show full text]
  • Recipients of Asa Awards
    APPENDIX 133 APPENDIX 11: RECIPIENTS OF ASA AWARDS MacIver Award 1956 E. Franklin Frazier, The Black Bourgeoisie (Free Press, 1957) 1957 no award given 1958 Reinhard Bendix, Work and Authority in Industry (Wiley, 1956) 1959 August B. Hollingshead and Frederick C. Redlich, Social Class and Mental Illness: A Community Study (Wiley, 1958) 1960 no award given 1961 Erving Goffman, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (Doubleday, 1959) 1962 Seymour Martin Lipset, Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics (Doubleday, 1960) 1963 Wilbert E. Moore, The Conduct of the Corporation (Random House, 1962) 1964 Shmuel N. Eisenstadt, The Political Systems of Empires (Free Press of Glencoe, 1963) 1965 William J. Goode, World Revolution and Family Patterns (Glencoe, 1963) 1966 John Porter, The Vertical Mosaic: An Analysis of Social Class and Power in Canada (University of Toronto, 1965) 1967 Kai T. Erikson, Wayward Puritans (Wiley, 1966) 1968 Barrington Moore, Jr., Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy (Beacon, 1966) Sorokin Award 1968 Peter M. Blau, Otis Dudley Duncan, and Andrea Tyree, The American Occupational Structure (Wiley, 1967) 1969 William A. Gamson, Power and Discontent (Dorsey, 1968) 1970 Arthur L. Stinchcombe, Constructing Social Theories (Harcourt, Brace, & World, 1968) 1971 Robert W. Friedrichs, A Sociology of Sociology; and Harrison C. White, Chains of Opportunity: Systems Models of Mobility in Organization (Free Press, 1970) 1972 Eliot Freidson, Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge (Dodd, Mead, 1970) 1973 no award given 1974 Clifford Geertz, The Interpretation of Cultures (Basic, 1973); and Christopher Jencks, Inequality (Basic, 1972) 1975 Immanuel Wallerstein, The Modern World System (Academic Press, 1974) 1976 Jeffrey Paige, Agrarian Revolution: Social Movements and Export Agriculture in the Underdeveloped World (Free Press, 1975); and Robert Bellah, The Broken Covenant: American Civil Religion in Time of Trial (Seabury Press, 1975) 1977 Kai T.
    [Show full text]
  • Demographic Destinies
    DEMOGRAPHIC DESTINIES Interviews with Presidents of the Population Association of America Interview with Kingsley Davis PAA President in 1962-63 This series of interviews with Past PAA Presidents was initiated by Anders Lunde (PAA Historian, 1973 to 1982) And continued by Jean van der Tak (PAA Historian, 1982 to 1994) And then by John R. Weeks (PAA Historian, 1994 to present) With the collaboration of the following members of the PAA History Committee: David Heer (2004 to 2007), Paul Demeny (2004 to 2012), Dennis Hodgson (2004 to present), Deborah McFarlane (2004 to 2018), Karen Hardee (2010 to present), Emily Merchant (2016 to present), and Win Brown (2018 to present) 1 KINGSLEY DAVIS PAA President in 1962-63 (No. 26). Interview with Jean van der Tak in Dr. Davis's office at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, California, May 1, 1989, supplemented by corrections and additions to the original interview transcript and other materials supplied by Dr. Davis in May 1990. CAREER HIGHLIGHTS: (Sections in quotes come from "An Attempt to Clarify Moves in Early Career," Kingsley Davis, May 1990.) Kingsley Davis was born in Tuxedo, Texas in 1908 and he grew up in Texas. He received an A.B. in English in 1930 and an M.A. in philosophy in 1932 from the University of Texas, Austin. He then went to Harvard, where he received an M.A. in sociology in 1933 and the Ph.D. in sociology in 1936. He taught sociology at Smith College in 1934-36 and at Clark University in 1936-37. From 1937 to 1944, he was Chairman of the Department of Sociology at Pennsylvania State University, although he was on leave in 1940-41 and in 1942-44.
    [Show full text]
  • The Controversy Surrounding the Davis-Moore Explanation of Stratification
    THE CONTROVERSY SURROUND1 NS THE DAVIS-MOORE EXPLANATION OF STRATIFICATION by Constance Anne Taylor B. Soc. Sc. (M. P. P. ) , Birmingham University, 1966 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of Political Science, Sociology and Anthropology - c? CONSTANCE ANVE TAYLOR 1963 SIMON 7RASER UNIVERSITY November, 1968. EXAMINING COMMITTEE APPROVAL David G. Bettison I Senior Supervisor - John McK. Whitworth Examining Commi t tee Karl Peter Examining Committee PARTIAL COPYRIGIIT LICENSE I hereby grant to Simon Fraser University the right to lend my thesis or dissertation (the title of which is shown below) to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library ' of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. I further agree that permission for multiple copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by me or the Dean of Graduate Studies. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Title of ~hesis/~issertation: --The ------ controversysurroundinfi - ---..---,-- the.--- bavis-Moore-- --..---.-..---exnlanation - ---of ---------stratification. P1.A. Thesis. Simon Fraser Ilniversitv. 7urnabv. l3.C.. 1968. BY Constance Anne Taylor. Author: (signature) (nee Constance Anne Taylor) (name ) (date) iii ABSTRACT We attempt to apply Mannheimls discussion of the sociology of knowledge to the controversy surround- ing the Davis-Moore arg7~ment. Manqheim distinguishes between 'he immanent and extrinsic interpretation of a body of intellectual knowledge, that is, between,on the one hand, interpretation in terms of the premises prescribed by an in?ellectual work, and on the other, while holding the basic premises in abeyance, in terms of its relationship to the wider existential situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Interviews Referencing Frank H. Hankins PAA President in 1945-46
    DEMOGRAPHIC DESTINIES Interviews with Presidents of the Population Association of America Interviews Referencing Frank H. Hankins PAA President in 1945-46 This series of interviews with Past PAA Presidents was initiated by Anders Lunde (PAA Historian, 1973 to 1982) And continued by Jean van der Tak (PAA Historian, 1982 to 1994) And then by John R. Weeks (PAA Historian, 1994 to present) With the collaboration of the following members of the PAA History Committee: David Heer (2004 to 2007), Paul Demeny (2004 to 2012), Dennis Hodgson (2004 to present), Deborah McFarlane (2004 to 2018), Karen Hardee (2010 to present), Emily Merchant (2016 to present), and Win Brown (2018 to present) FRANK H. HANKINS We do not have an interview with Frank Hankins, who was the ninth PAA President (1945-46). However, as Andy Lunde and Jean van der Tak (VDT) were interviewing other past presidents, they regularly asked questions about those early presidents whom they had been unable to interview. Below are the excerpted comments about Frank Hankins. CAREER HIGHLIGHTS Frank Hamilton Hankins was born in Wilkshire, Ohio in 1877, but grew up in Kansas. He graduated from Baker University in Baldwin City, Kansas, in 1901. He was superintendent of schools in Waverly, Kansas, for two years before going to Columbia University, where he received his Ph.D. in 1908. He taught at Clark University from 1906 to 1922, and was head of its Department of Political and Social Science. He then moved to Smith College, where he taught until he retired in 1946, just after serving as PAA President.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Principles of Stratification Author(S): Kingsley Davis and Wilbert E
    Some Principles of Stratification Author(s): Kingsley Davis and Wilbert E. Moore Source: American Sociological Review, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1944 Annual Meeting Papers (Apr., 1945), pp. 242-249 Published by: American Sociological Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2085643 . Accessed: 14/11/2013 13:03 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. American Sociological Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to American Sociological Review. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.210.85.113 on Thu, 14 Nov 2013 13:03:09 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 242 AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICALREVIEW less wholesome than those of children in un- vantage of the child, for the new parent has broken homes. In some instances, the com- been able to enter into a more sympathetic ing of a step-parent has been to the ad- intimacy with the child than his own parent. SOME PRINCIPLES OF STRATIFICATION KINGSLEYDAVIS AND WILBERT E. MooRE PrincetonUniversity IN A PREVIOUS PAPER some conceptsfor carry different degrees of prestige, and quite handling the phenomena of social in- another to ask how certain individuals get equality were presented.' In the present into those positions.
    [Show full text]
  • Kingsley Davis Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt3b69q94k No online items Inventory of the Kingsley Davis papers Finding aid prepared by Aparna Mukherjee Hoover Institution Library and Archives © 2007 434 Galvez Mall Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-6003 [email protected] URL: http://www.hoover.org/library-and-archives Inventory of the Kingsley Davis 83035 1 papers Title: Kingsley Davis papers Date (inclusive): 1926-1981 Collection Number: 83035 Contributing Institution: Hoover Institution Library and Archives Language of Material: English Physical Description: 55 manuscript boxes(33.0 Linear Feet) Abstract: Speeches and writings, correspondence, notes, statistics, memoranda, reports, and printed matter, relating to international population changes, changes in family structure, and urbanization. Creator: Davis, Kingsley, 1908-1997 Hoover Institution Library & Archives Access The collection is open for research; materials must be requested at least two business days in advance of intended use. Publication Rights For copyright status, please contact the Hoover Institution Library & Archives. Acquisition Information Materials were acquired by the Hoover Institution Library & Archives in 1983. Preferred Citation [Identification of item], Kingsley Davis Papers, [Box no., Folder no. or title], Hoover Institution Library & Archives. 1908 Born, Tuxedo, Texas August 20 1930 A.B. in English, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 1932 M.A. in Philosophy, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 1933 M.A. in Sociology, Harvard University,
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Sociology: Concepts, Theories and Models
    Chapter 6: Stratification and Social Structure Prof. Dr. Dirk Helbing and Team Zurich April 15, 2008 1 / 54 Introduction to Sociology: Concepts, Theories and Models. Prof. Dr. Dirk Helbing and Team Chair of Sociology, in particular of Modeling and Simulation April 15, 2008 Chair of Sociology, in particular of Modeling and Simulation http://www.soms.ethz.ch/ Chapter 6: Stratification and Social Structure Prof. Dr. Dirk Helbing and Team Zurich April 15, 2008 1 / 54 Chapter 7: Stratification and Social Structure Sergi Lozano and Dirk Helbing www.soms.ethz.ch [email protected] Chair of Sociology, in particular of Modeling and Simulation http://www.soms.ethz.ch/ Chapter 6: Stratification and Social Structure Prof. Dr. Dirk Helbing and Team Zurich April 15, 2008 2 / 54 Overview Overview 1 Introduction 2 Theories of Social Stratification 3 Social Mobility: When Things Can Change 4 Stratification and Social Structure 5 Mathematical and Computational Models 6 Main ideas and references Chair of Sociology, in particular of Modeling and Simulation http://www.soms.ethz.ch/ Chapter 6: Stratification and Social Structure Prof. Dr. Dirk Helbing and Team Zurich April 15, 2008 3 / 54 Introduction Social Stratification Social Stratification Social stratification: A system by which a society ranks categories of people in a hierarchy. It’s a trait of society, not just a result of individual differences. It’s transmitted from generation to generation. It’s present in all kind of societies, but with variable characteristics. It’s supported by cultural beliefs (Macionis, 2007) Chair of Sociology, in particular of Modeling and Simulation http://www.soms.ethz.ch/ Chapter 6: Stratification and Social Structure Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Kingsley Davis 1908–1997
    Kingsley Davis 1908–1997 A Biographical Memoir by Geoffrey McNicoll ©2019 National Academy of Sciences. Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. KINGSLEY DAVIS August 20, 1908–February 27, 1997 Elected to the NAS, 1966 Kingsley Davis was a significant figure in American sociology of the mid-twentieth century and by many esti- mations the leading social demographer of his generation. He made influential contributions to social stratification theory and to the study of family and kinship. He was an early theorist of demographic transition—the emergence of low-mortality, low-fertility regimes in industrializing societies—and a protagonist in major and continuing debates on policy responses to rapid population growth in low-income countries. Davis held faculty appointments at a sucession of leading universities, for longest at the University of California, Berkleley. He was honored by his peers in both sociology By Geoffrey McNicoll and demography: president of the America Sociological Association in 1959 and of the Population Association of America in 1962-’63. He was elected to the National Academy of Sciences in 1966, the first sociologist to be a member. Kingsley Davis was born in Tuxedo, Texas, a small community near Abilene, in 1908. His parents were Joseph Dyer Davis, a physician, and Winifred Kingsley Davis; he was a collateral descendant of Jefferson Davis. He took his baccalaureate from the University of Texas in 1930. (Revisiting the campus decades later as a distinguished professor, he allowed that he would not have qualified for admission under later, more stringent criteria.) Two years later at the same institution he received an MA in philosophy with a thesis on the moral philosophy of Bertrand Russell.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms. a XERQ\Company. Ann Arbor. Michigan
    71-7541 PRESTON, Frederick William, 1941- RED, WHITE, BLACK AND BLUE; THE CONCEPT OF RACE IN AMERICAN SOCIOLOGY: AN EXPLORATION IN THE SOCIOLOGY OF KNOWLEDGE. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1970 Sociology, race question University Microfilms. A XERQ\Company. Ann Arbor. Michigan THIS DISSERTATION HAS BEEN MICROFILMED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED R5D, ’vHITK, BLACK AND BLUE; TÎÎR CONCRPT OF RACE IN AMERICAN SOCIOLOGY: AN EXPLORATION IN THE SOCIOLOGY OF KNOWLEDGE DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Frederick William Preston, B.A., M.A, The Ohio State University 1970 Approved by Ai<ijn.ser (-B^partment of Sociology ACKNOWLZDCÜKIYS Over the years one is aided by nany in his intellectual development. I am particularly indebted to Nason Hall, Leon Warshay and Carl Nissen who as members of this department took much interest in my growth as a student and scholar. For their suggestions in the formulation of this study I thank Larry Reynolds and Don Noel. I ar.i very such indebted to the members of my dissertation committee for their many hours of effort in behalf of this investigation. John Cubor, who has served as my major advisor and chairman of the committee, has al/ays been very encouraging and of particular assistance in editorial advice. Douglas Card, in representing the positivists, has been very helpful in arranging the data, and in setting forth specific I'elationships. Jora Nysong, tho third member of the dissertation committee, made numerous helpful and insightful suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • Relating to Work: Generation, Discourse and Social Change
    Relating to Work: Generation, Discourse and Social Change By Karen R. Foster A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario ©2011 Karen R. Foster Library and Archives Bibliotheque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-87744-9 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-87744-9 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distrbute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 the Field of Demography
    CHAPTER 1 THE FIELD OF DEMOGRAPHY LEARNING OBJECTIVES ■ Describe the influence of anthropological, ■ List four questions that demography can address. psychological, political, and statistical ■ List four social problems or policies in which the perspectives on population thinking. application of demography is useful. ■ Discuss the difference between neo-Malthusian ■ Describe the two main ways to think about thinking and neo-Marxist thinking about the population change. relation between population growth and the availability of food and other resources. ■ Outline the major historical patterns that have shaped population thinking and the theories that have been developed to explain these patterns. Listen to the Chapter Audio OVERVIEW economic, and political issues. This book concen- trates on the causes of population processes rather This book examines the three major population pro- than the effects of population processes. cesses: mortality, fertility, and migration. It is an in- The student will be introduced to several measures troduction to the technical and substantive aspects of of each of these processes and how to interpret these demography—the study of the growth and structure measures. Technical and methodological material of human populations, with an emphasis on substan- is examined to enable the student to understand the tive issues. meaning and interpretation of the measures but with- If you look at the size of the population of a geo- out detailed consideration of the underlying mathemat- graphic area at two points in time, people are added ics and statistics. Other books focus on more technical to the original population through births and migrants aspects of demographic measures and methods.1 into the area, and people are removed from the origi- After using this book, a student will be familiar nal population through deaths and migrants out of with the major theoretical perspectives and policy the area.
    [Show full text]