DOCSLIB.ORG

Healthy Eating: Fish, Meat, Dairy and Eggs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Healthy Eating: Fish, Meat, Dairy and Eggs Healthy Eating Fish, Meat, Dairy and Eggs Eating fish Eating fish can reduce your risk for heart disease. Fish are high in healthy fats. How much fish should I eat? Eat 1-2 servings per week of fish and seafood that are low in mercury. Canned light tuna Trout Sardines Catfish Atlantic mackerel Salmon Shrimp Herring Anchovies Avoid fish that are high in mercury. Try not to eat king mackerel, tilefish, shark, swordfish, white tuna, and albacore tuna. Chicken and turkey are good choices Chicken and turkey cost less than meat and fish. It is OK to eat the skin. The fat quality in the skin is quite good. How much chicken and turkey should I eat? It is fine to eat chicken and turkey 3 or more times each week. Be careful about eating fried chicken from restaurants. It may have unhealthy trans fats and a lot of salt. Ask the restaurant what type of oil they use for frying. How should I cook my fish, chicken, and turkey? You can bake, broil, grill, barbeque or fry. If you fry, be sure to use healthy vegetable oils. Eat less red meat, like beef, pork, and lamb People who eat large amounts of red meat have an increased risk for colon cancer. Eat red meat no more than 2 times each day or less. Avoid processed meats like bacon, sausage, hot dogs, and cold cuts Processed meats include deli meats like turkey, chicken, roast beef, corned beef, and so on. Processed meats increase your risk for heart disease, probably because of the preservatives (salt, nitrites, and phosphates). Limit processed meat to 2 times per week or less. What about eggs? Eggs are a good source of protein and healthy fats. If you enjoy eating eggs, eating 1 or 2 a day is fine. What about milk, cheese, and yogurt? It is fine to have 2-3 servings of low or full fat milk, cheese, or yogurt per day. A serving of milk and yogurt is 1 cup. A serving of cheese is about the size of your thumb, 1 ounce. Avoid drinking flavored milk because of the high sugar content. Limit flavored yogurts because of the high sugar content. Buy plain yogurt and add your own fruit. Limit dairy desserts (ice cream, ice milk, and frozen yogurt) to 2 times a week or less. They contain more sugar than other dairy products. Summary Eat fish 1 or more times a week. It contains healthy fats. Poultry is healthier than red meat and costs less. Avoid processed meats, like cold cuts, hot dogs, deli meats, sausage, and bacon. Limit red meats. Dairy products (milk, yogurt, cheese) and eggs are other good choices. Goals Check one or two goals to start working on! Eat fish 1 or more times each week Choose fish with low levels of mercury, such as salmon, catfish, shrimp, and canned light tuna. If you eat canned tuna choose light tuna, not albacore or white tuna. When you fry fish use health fats like vegetable oil instead of shortening or lard. Cut down on bacon, sausage, hot dogs and cold cuts Try having breakfast without meat on some days. Try sandwiches made with sliced fresh beef, chicken or turkey. Choose chicken and turkey more often Try eating 3 or more servings of poultry each week. Do not fry chicken in shortening, as most shortening has unhealthy trans fats. Cut down on red meat If you like eating red meat like beef, pork or lamb, aim for no more than 2 servings per day. Less is better. Choose dairy products like milk, cheese, and yogurt to replace less healthy meats If you enjoy dairy products, 2 to 3 servings per day of low or full fat dairy products is a good goal. Ice cream, frozen yogurts and other dairy desserts are high in sugar. Save these treats a couple times per week or less. Eggs are a good choice Eating 1 to 2 eggs per day should not increase your risk of heart disease. Try hard boiled eggs. They are great on salads or as a healthy snack. Goals and First Steps Healthy Eating 1. ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ First steps: ________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ Date: ___________________ 2. ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ First steps: ________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ Date:___________________ 3. ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ First steps: ________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ Date:___________________ 4. ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ First steps: ________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ Date:___________________ .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Where's the Beef? Communicating Vegetarianism in Mainstream America
    Where’s the Beef? Communicating Vegetarianism in Mainstream America ALLISON WALTER Produced in Mary Tripp’s Spring 2013 ENC 1102 Introduction “Engaging in non-mainstream behavior can be challenging to negotiate communicatively, especially when it involves the simple but necessary task of eating, a lifelong activity that is often done in others’ company,” argue researchers Romo and Donovan-Kicken (405). This can be especially true for vegetarians in America. The American view of a good and balanced meal includes a wide array of meats that have become standard on most all of the country's dinner tables. When it comes to eating in American society today, fruits and vegetables come to mind as side dishes or snacks, not the main course. Vegetarians challenge this expectation of having meat as an essential component of survival by adopting a lifestyle that no longer conforms to the norms of society as a whole. Although vegetarians can be seen as “healthy deviants”—people who violate social norms in relatively healthy ways—they are faced with the burden of stigmatization by those who cannot see past their views of conformity (Romo and Donovan-Kicken 405). This can lead to a continuous battle for vegetarians where they are questioned and scrutinized for their decisions only because they are not the same as many of their peers. The heaviest load that individuals who decide to deviate from the norms of a given society have to carry is attempting to stay true to themselves in a world that forces them to fit in. Culture, Society, and Food One of the largest and most complex factors that contribute to food choice is society and the cultures within that society that certain groups of people hold close to them (Jabs, Sobal, and Devine 376).
    [Show full text]
  • To Eat Or Not to Eat Red Meat. a Closer Look at the Relationship Between Restrained Eating and Vegetarianism in College Females
    W&M ScholarWorks Psychological Sciences Articles & Book Chapters Psychological Sciences Fall 11-2-2011 To eat or not to eat red meat. A closer look at the relationship between restrained eating and vegetarianism in college females Catherine A. Forestell College of William and Mary, [email protected] Andrea M. Spaeth College of William and Mary Stephanie A. Kane College of William and Mary Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/psychologypub Part of the Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Forestell, Catherine A.; Spaeth, Andrea M.; and Kane, Stephanie A., To eat or not to eat red meat. A closer look at the relationship between restrained eating and vegetarianism in college females (2011). Appetite, 58(1), 319-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2011.10.015 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Psychological Sciences at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Psychological Sciences Articles & Book Chapters by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Our reference: APPET 1355 P-authorquery-v10 AUTHOR QUERY FORM Journal: APPET Please e-mail or fax your responses and any corrections to: E-mail: [email protected] Article Number: 1355 Fax: +31 2048 52799 Dear Author, Please check your proof carefully and mark all corrections at the appropriate place in the proof (e.g., by using on-screen annotation in the PDF file) or compile them in a separate list. Note: if you opt to annotate the file with software other than Adobe Reader then please also highlight the appropriate place in the PDF file.
    [Show full text]
  • REDUCTION of PURINE CONTENT in COMMONLY CONSUMED MEAT PRODUCTS THROUGH RINSING and COOKING by Anna Ellington (Under the Directio
    REDUCTION OF PURINE CONTENT IN COMMONLY CONSUMED MEAT PRODUCTS THROUGH RINSING AND COOKING by Anna Ellington (Under the direction of Yen-Con Hung) Abstract The commonly consumed meat products ground beef, ground turkey, and bacon were analyzed for purine content before and after a rinsing treatment. The rinsing treatment involved rinsing the meat samples using a wrist shaker in 5:1 ratio water: sample for 2 or 5 minutes then draining or centrifuging to remove water. The total purine content of 25% fat ground beef significantly decreased (p<0.05) from 8.58 mg/g protein to a range of 5.17-7.26 mg/g protein after rinsing treatments. After rinsing and cooking an even greater decrease was seen ranging from 4.59-6.32 mg/g protein. The total purine content of 7% fat ground beef significantly decreased from 7.80 mg/g protein to a range of 5.07-5.59 mg/g protein after rinsing treatments. A greater reduction was seen after rinsing and cooking in the range of 4.38-5.52 mg/g protein. Ground turkey samples showed no significant changes after rinsing, but significant decreases were seen after rinsing and cooking. Bacon samples showed significant decreases from 6.06 mg/g protein to 4.72 and 4.49 after 2 and 5 minute rinsing and to 4.53 and 4.68 mg/g protein after 2 and 5 minute rinsing and cooking. Overall, this study showed that rinsing foods in water effectively reduces total purine content and subsequent cooking after rinsing results in an even greater reduction of total purine content.
    [Show full text]
  • Spicy Beef Tongue Stew
    Spicy Beef Tongue Stew Serves six 1 beef tongue – trimmed 1 celery stalk 1 small carrot – halved 2 garlic cloves – peeled and smashed + 1 for the chilies 4 fresh thyme sprigs 1 small white onion – peeled and halved + ½ for the chilies 1 chili pepper – halved 6 red chilies (aji Colorado or aji Panka) or 3 Guajillos, 3 Ancho and 3 chile Arbol 1 TBS cumin 1 tsp. salt 1/8 cup canola oil ¼ cup peas (can be thawed frozen ones or fresh) 1 large carrot – peeled and cut into sticks Salt & Pepper Rinse the trimmed beef tongue and place it in a pressure cooker. Add the celery, onion, carrot, garlic cloves, thyme and chili pepper. Cook for about 1 hour – after the pressure cooker starts making noise. While the tongue is cooking – stem the dry chili pods. Cut them in the middle and seed them. Char them by placing them directly on an open flame. If you do not have a gas stove, go ahead and press them down on a dry, hot skillet until they blister. Place the charred chilies in a bowl and cover with water. Soak for about 25 to 30 minutes. Once soaked, place them in a blender with the remaining onion, garlic and cumin. Add about 1 cup of the soaking liquid and blend until you have a smooth paste with no chili chunks. Once the tongue is cooked – cool down the pressure cooker completely and remove them. Do not discard the cooking liquid. Cool them down and peel them by pulling on the skin and membrane on the meat.
    [Show full text]
  • Using of Horsemeat As an Additional Source of Raw Materials for Expanding the Range of Meat Products
    38 Specialized and multidisciplinary scientific researches Volume 2 . DOI 10.36074/11.12.2020.v2.10 USING OF HORSEMEAT AS AN ADDITIONAL SOURCE OF RAW MATERIALS FOR EXPANDING THE RANGE OF MEAT PRODUCTS ORCID ID: 0000-0002-6591-0414 Ihor Strashynskyi Ph.D, Associate Professor, Associate Professor Departmentof Meat and Meat Products Technology National University of Food Technologies ORCID ID: 0000-0002-8816-0388 Oksana Fursik Assistant Departmentof Meat and Meat ProductsTechnology Educational and Scientific Institute of Food Technologies National University of Food Technologies UKRAINE Today, due to the extensive development of intensive industrial growing of farm animals, such as poultry, pigs and, to a lesser extent, cattle, the production of horse meat almost all over the world, with the exception countries and regions with traditionally developed herd horse breeding, is inferior to the production of these animals meat and it is mainly used in the manufacture certain varieties of sausages to improve the structural and mechanical properties of finished products, as well as their piquant taste. There are regions in the world where horse meat is widely used as the main meat food product. Horse meat is now available in France, Belgium and Sweden, where horse meat sales outnumber mutton meat sales. In France, horse meat consumption is 0.4% of all meat consumed. There are about 750 horse meat butchers in the country and about 11,000 farmers who raise horses for sale for meat. The main part of horse meat products that produced in France are exported to Italy. Italians consume twice as much horse meat as the French and love the meat of young horses, while the French prefer red meat from older horses [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Don't Fall for Tricky Meat & Poultry Claims
    Lean? here do Wthe bro- chures, posters, and voluntary labels for meat get their num- bers? In most Don’t fall for tricky meat cases, from the USDA’s data- & poultry claims base. And where does the USDA BY LINDSAY MOYER & JENNIFER URBAN gets its numbers? 0" trim? Fat chance. It’s no secret that Americans need to cut back on meat. While we Mostly from, or now eat more chicken than beef, we still eat too much red meat, with funding from, the beef and pork industries. Hmm... especially beef. That’s bad news for our health and for the planet. The USDA’s database has numbers for beef that has had People who eat more red meat—especially processed meat—have the fat around its edges trimmed down to just ⁄8” or 0”. a higher risk of colon cancer, heart disease, and stroke. (The pork industry never even says how much its cuts were trimmed.) And it doesn’t help that misleading information about meat or The USDA also has numbers for what’s called “separable poultry can trick even the most careful shoppers. Here’s what to lean.” That’s after scalpel-wielding technicians trim off the watch out for. “separable fat”—every bit of fat except marbling within the muscle. Missing labels? All that trimming (where do you keep your scalpel?) helps explain how the beef industry’s website can end up touting voluntarily, you’re 38 cuts of “lean” beef. The list even includes fatty cuts like stuck with a brochure New York strip steak and brisket.
    [Show full text]
  • 12 Steak Tartare
    November 22nd, 2018 3 Course Menu, $42 per person ( tax & gratuity additional ) ( no substitutions, no teal deals, thanksgiving day menu is a promotional menu ) Salad or Soup (choice, descriptions below) Caesar Salad, Wedge Salad, Lobster Bisque or Italian White Bean & Kale Entrée (choice, descriptions below) Herb Roasted Turkey, Local Flounder, Faroe Island Salmon or Braised Beef Short Rib Dessert (choice) Dark Chocolate Mousse Cake, Old Fashioned Carrot Cake, Pumpkin Cheesecake, Cinnamon Ice Cream, Vanilla Ice Cream or Raspberry Sorbet A LA CARTE MENU APPETIZERS ENTREES Butternut Squash & Gouda Arancini … 13 Herb Roasted Fresh Turkey … 32 (5) risotto arancini, asparagus pesto, truffle oil, mashed potato, herbed chestnut stuffing, fried sage, aged pecorino Romano glazed heirloom carrots, haricot vert, truffled brown gravy, cranberry relish Smoked Salmon Bruschetta … 12 house smoked Faroe Island salmon, lemon aioli, Local Flounder … 32 micro salad with shallot - dill vinaigrette, crispy capers warm orzo, sweet corn, sun dried tomato, edamame & vidalia, sautéed kale, bell pepper-saffron jam, basil pesto Steak Tartare … 14 beef tenderloin, sous vide egg yolk, caper, Faroe Island Salmon* … 32 shallot, lemon emulsion, parmesan dust, garlic loaf toast roasted spaghetti squash, haricot vert & slivered almonds, carrot puree, garlic tomato confit, shallot dill beurre blanc Grilled Spanish Octopus … 14 gigante bean & arugula sauté, grape tomatoes, Boneless Beef Short Rib … 32 salsa verde, aged balsamic reduction oyster mushroom risotto, sautéed
    [Show full text]
  • Retail Cuts of Beef BEEF Retail Cut Name Specie Primal Name Cookery Primal
    Revised June 14 Nebraska 4-H Meat Retail Cut Identification Codes Retail Cuts of Beef BEEF Retail Cut Name Specie Primal Name Cookery Primal Brisket Beef Brisket, Corned, Bnls B B 89 M Beef Brisket, Flat Half, Bnls B B 15 M Beef Brisket, Whole, Bnls B B 10 M Chuck Beef Chuck Arm Pot-Roast B C 03 M Beef Chuck Arm Pot-Roast, Bnls B C 04 M Beef Chuck Blade Roast B C 06 M Beef Chuck 7-Bone Pot-Roast B C 26 M Beef Chuck Eye Roast, Bnls B C 13 D/M Beef Chuck Eye Steak, Bnls B C 45 D Beef Chuck Mock Tender Roast B C 20 M Beef Chuck Mock Tender Steak B C 48 M Beef Chuck Petite Tender B C 21 D Beef Chuck Shoulder Pot Roast (Bnls) B C 29 D/M Beef Chuck Top Blade Steak (Flat Iron) B C 58 D Rib Beef Rib Roast B H 22 D Beef Rib Eye Steak, Lip-on B H 50 D Beef Rib Eye Roast, Bnls B H 13 D Beef Rib Eye Steak, Bnls B H 45 D Plate Beef Plate Short Ribs B G 28 M Beef Plate Skirt Steak, Bnls B G 54 D/M Loin Beef Loin Top Loin Steak B F 59 D Beef Loin Top Loin Steak, Bnls B F 60 D Beef Loin T-bone Steak B F 55 D Beef Loin Porterhouse Steak B F 49 D Beef Loin Tenderloin Steak B F 56 D Beef Loin Tenderloin Roast B F 34 D Beef Loin Top Sirloin Steak, Bnls B F 62 D Beef Loin Top Sirloin Cap Steak, Bnls B F 64 D Beef Loin Top Sirloin Steak, Bnls Cap Off B F 63 D Beef Loin Tri-Tip Roast B F 40 D Flank Beef Flank Steak B D 47 D/M Round Beef Round Steak B I 51 M Beef Round Steak, Bnls B I 52 M BEEF Retail Cut Name Specie Primal Name Cookery Primal Beef Bottom Round Rump Roast B I 09 D/M Beef Round Top Round Steak B I 61 D Beef Round Top Round Roast B I 39 D Beef
    [Show full text]
  • HOW MUCH MEAT to EXPECT from a BEEF CARCASS Rob Holland, Director Center for Profitable Agriculture
    PB 1822 HOW MUCH MEAT TO EXPECT FROM A BEEF CARCASS Rob Holland, Director Center for Profitable Agriculture Dwight Loveday, Associate Professor Department of Food Science and Technology Kevin Ferguson UT Extension Area Specialist-Farm Management University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture CONTENTS 2...Introduction 3...Dressing Percentage 5...Chilled Carcass and Primal Cuts 6...Sub-primal Meat Cuts 6...Factors Affecting Yield of Retail Cuts 7...Average Amount of Meat from Each Sub-primal Cut 9...Summary University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture Introduction Consumers who buy a live animal from a local cattle producer for custom processing are often surprised. Some are surprised at the quantity of meat and amount of freezer space they need. Others may be surprised that they did not get the entire live weight of the animal in meat cuts. The amount of meat actually available from a beef animal is a frequent source of misunderstanding between consumers, processors and cattle producers. This document provides information to assist in the understanding of how much meat to expect from a beef carcass. The information provided here should be helpful to consumers who purchase a live animal for freezer beef and to cattle producers involved in direct and retail meat marketing. 2 University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture How Much Meat to Expect from a Beef Carcass Dressing Percentage One of the terms used in the cattle and meat cutting industry that often leads to misunderstanding is dressing percentage. The dressing percentage is the portion of the live animal weight that results in the hot carcass.
    [Show full text]
  • Variation of Amino Acids in White and Red Meat of Skipjack Tuna (Katsuwonus Pelamis) Caught from Arabian Sea
    ISSN: 2319-8753 International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology Vol. 2, Issue 7, July 2013 VARIATION OF AMINO ACIDS IN WHITE AND RED MEAT OF SKIPJACK TUNA (KATSUWONUS PELAMIS) CAUGHT FROM ARABIAN SEA Remya James1, Vineeth Kumar T V2 Assistant Professor, Department of Zoology, St. Joseph‟s College for Women, Alappuzha, Kerala, India1 Research Scholar, Chemical Biology Laboratory, Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India2 Abstract: Amino acid profile of the white and red (dark) meat in Katsuwonus pelamis, a tuna fish, caught from Arabian Sea in the month of January, was estimated using gas chromatography. There was no significant variation between red and white meat samples for the total percentage of essential and non-essential amino acids which constitute 52.3% and 47.7% respectively. Non essential amino acids asparagine and glutamine, and semi essential amino acid cysteine were not detected in both, red meat and white meat samples. Glutamate makes up approximately 13% in both samples which can be considered the highest. Certain individual amino acids, histidine, lysine and arginine showed variation between red and white meat samples. Keywords: red meat; white meat; amino acid; lysine; Katsuwonus pelamis I. INTRODUCTION Fish protein, like that of meat, is easily digestible and favorably complements dietary protein provided by beef, pork, chicken, cereals and legumes that are typically consumed in many developing countries (Winton and Winton, 2000). The protein in fish makes up complete protein source and tuna is a good source of high quality proteins. Tuna have white flesh and flesh that is pink to dark red.
    [Show full text]
  • A Prospective Study of Red Meat Consumption and Type 2 Diabetes in Middle-Aged and Elderly Women the Women’S Health Study
    Epidemiology/Health Services/Psychosocial Research ORIGINAL ARTICLE A Prospective Study of Red Meat Consumption and Type 2 Diabetes in Middle-Aged and Elderly Women The Women’s Health Study 1,2 1,2,4 YIQING SONG, MD JULIE E. BURING, SCD suspected as an important and indepen- 1,2,3 1,2 JOANN E. MANSON, MD, DRPH SIMIN LIU, MD, SCD dent contributor to risk of type 2 diabetes. This hypothesis was first generated based on the evidence from ecologic and mi- grant studies (2,3) and subsequently sup- OBJECTIVE — The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the relation between red ported by several cross-sectional and meat intake and incidence of type 2 diabetes. prospective studies of dietary patterns and diabetes (4–6). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS — Over an average of 8.8 years, we evaluated Since the Seventh Day Adventists 37,309 participants in the Women’s Health Study aged Ն45 years who were free of cardiovas- Study first reported a positive association cular disease, cancer, and type 2 diabetes and completed validated semiquantitative food fre- between total meat intake and risk of type quency questionnaires in 1993. 2 diabetes in a population with a large proportion of vegetarians (7), few studies RESULTS — During 326,876 person-years of follow-up, we documented 1,558 incident have specifically assessed this relation be- cases of type 2 diabetes. After adjusting for age, BMI, total energy intake, exercise, alcohol intake, cigarette smoking, and family history of diabetes, we found positive associations between intakes tween meat consumption and incidence of red meat and processed meat and risk of type 2 diabetes.
    [Show full text]
  • Beef Breakdown.Indd
    Your Beef Breakdown, Explained If you have ever purchased a quarter, a side or a whole 14- to 21-day period. During this aging process the meat Loin and Round, all possess di erent beef carcass, chances are you have wondered why you have develops avor, and most importantly, becomes more taste characteristics because they are received less meat than expected. e average weight of a tender. Unfortunately, a small amount of weight is lost made up of di erent muscles with live steer or heifer ready for harvest is 1,300 pounds! So during the aging process due to water evaporation. di erent tenderness levels, di erent how much of this product should you expect to receive in Carcass to Cuts fat contents and varying avor pro les. edible meat products? For instance, the Chuck and Round After the carcass is properly aged, it is ready to be are most commonly seen in roast Steer to Carcass broken down into retail cuts. On average, 21 percent of form, but Round Roasts are much In order to change a 1,300-pound beef animal into edible each carcass is inedible bone, fat and connective tissue. leaner (have less fat) than those from meat product, butchers rst have to convert it into a Once the carcass is fabricated and inedible objects are the Chuck and therefore will have a carcass by removing the hide, head and internal organs. removed, a whole carcass will yield about 639 pounds of less intense avor. e Rib and Loin On average, only 62 percent of the animal’s original edible beef product.
    [Show full text]