DOCSLIB.ORG

Cancer Prevention Limiting Processed and Red Meats in the Diet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cancer Prevention Limiting Processed and Red Meats in the Diet bigstockphoto.com CANCER PREVENTION LIMITING PROCESSED AND RED MEATS IN THE DIET What is red meat? Motivational Tip Red meat is minimally processed cuts of meat from animals such as beef, veal, pork, deer, lamb, mutton, horse, and goat. Red meat Moderation is key to a healthy lifestyle and eating pattern to is a complete protein and provides iron, B vitamins, zinc, and reduce your risk for chronic disease. Choose lean meats, fish, all essential nutrients. While red meat is a complete protein, you should moderate the amount you consume in your diet. and plant-based protein options as a part of a healthy diet. What are some alternative You may have heard that eating processed and red meats can protein options to red meat and increase your risk for cancer. In this fact sheet we will briefly processed meats? review what the U.S. Dietary Guidelines and research says, and provide resources for you to learn more about the topic. Cuts of lean meat, such as skinless chicken or turkey breast; fish, such as salmon, tuna, or white fish; nuts, such as almonds, wal- nuts, and peanuts; legumes (peas and beans); fat-free and low-fat What is cancer? dairy, such as skim milk and cottage cheese; and seeds are all good sources of protein that can be included as part of a healthy diet to The American Cancer Society says, “Cancer can start any place lower your risk of cancer. in the body. It starts when cells grow out of control and crowd out normal cells. This makes it hard for the body to work the way it should.” What does the U.S. Dietary Guidelines tell us about eating What are processed meats? meat? Processed meats are meats made from beef, pork, and poultry that The U.S. Dietary Guidelines states that lower intakes of meat, have been preserved by curing, salting, smoking, drying, canning, including processed meats, have been identified as characteristics or fermenting. Examples of common processed meats include: of a healthy eating pattern and reduce the risk of cancer. Processed • Bacon • Sausage meats are also high in fat and sodium, which can raise the risk for • Hot dogs • Pepperoni other chronic diseases, like cardiovascular disease and diabetes, • Lunch meat • Salami in addition to cancer. Include red and processed meats in moder- • Corned beef • Jerky ation and select lean meat and a variety of protein foods as a part • Canned meat of a healthy diet. The guidelines recommend different amounts of protein in ounce-equivalents be consumed daily. These daily amounts differ based on a person’s age, gender, and calorie requirement for each day. Speak with your health care provider or a registered dietician to learn what would be recommended for you. Examine Your Choices Shopping Tips Food Source What I Buy What I Plan to Buy/Change • Choose fresh Protein foods Meat, fat-free and low-fat Red meat, chicken with Lean meat, skinless poultry, dairy, nuts, seeds, legumes the skin on, and bacon fish, nuts, seeds, and legumes • Look for lean cuts of meat • Look for skinless poultry My Goal (what change will you make?): What is 1 ounce-equivalent See the resources below for more information. American Cancer Society: Causes, Risk Factors, and of protein food? Prevention of Colorectal Cancer www.cancer.org/cancer/ • 1 ounce of meat, poultry, or fish colon-rectal-cancer/causes-risks-prevention/prevention.html • ¼ cup of cooked beans Penn State Cancer Institute Colorectal Cancer Information • 1 egg www.pennstatehealth.org/services-treatments/colorectal-cancer • 1 tablespoon of peanut butter Pennsylvania Department of Health Colorectal Cancer Webpage • ½ ounce of nuts or seeds www.health.pa.gov/topics/disease/Cancer/Pages/ Eat a variety of the above protein foods daily as part of Colorectal-Cancer.aspx Sources a healthy diet. “Bacon and Food Safety.” United States Department of Agriculture, October 29, 2013. https:// www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/food-safety-education/get-answers/food-safety- fact-sheets/meat-preparation/bacon-and-food-safety/ct_index. Bedale, W., J. J. Sindelar, and A. L. Milkowski. “Dietary Nitrate and Nitrite: Benefits, Risks, and Why have you been hearing Evolving Perceptions.” Meat Sci. 120 (2016): 85–92. Butler, A. “Nitrites and Nitrates in the Human Diet: Carcinogens or Beneficial Hypotensive about meat and cancer in the Agents?” J Ethnopharmacol. 167 (2015): 105–7. “Cancer Screening Guidelines by Age.” American Cancer Society. https://www.cancer.org/ healthy/find-cancer-early/cancer-screening-guidelines/screening-recommendations- news? by-age.html. Citroner, G. “Controversial Red Meat Study Under Scrutiny After Researcher Linked to Food In 2015 the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC; Industry.” Healthline, October 7, 2019. the cancer agency of the World Health Organization) reviewed Johnston, B. C., D. Zeraatkar, M. A. Han, et al. “Unprocessed Red Meat and Processed Meat Consumption: Dietary Guideline Recommendations from the Nutritional Recommendations existing research and showed a link between cancer deaths and (NutriRECS) Consortium.” Ann Intern Med (2019); Epub ahead of print 1 October 2019, doi: eating processed meats. Eating approximately 2 ounces (50 grams, 10.7326/M19-1621. Kolata, G. “Eat Less Red Meat, Scientists Said. Now Some Believe That Was Bad Advice.” also equal to six strips of bacon or one hot dog) of processed meat New York Times, October 4, 2019. “Limit Red and Processed Meat.” World Cancer Research Fund International. https://www each day raises a person’s risk of getting colorectal cancer by 18 .wcrf.org/dietandcancer/recommendations/limit-red-processed-meat. Accessed October percent. IARC reported that eating roughly 2 ounces of processed 19, 2019. Pennsylvania Department of Health. Cancer Dashboard. Retrieved August 21, 2020, from meat per day can be connected to 34,000 deaths per year. IARC https://www.health.pa.gov/topics/HealthStatistics/CancerStatistics/dashboard/Pages/ did not find that the consumption of red meat causes cancer, but Cancer-Dashboard.aspx. Simon, S. “What’s Wrong with Hot Dogs, Hamburgers, and Bacon?” June 25, 2018 it did find a possible relation between consuming a lot (more than https://www.cancer.org/latest-news/hot-dogs-hamburgers-bacon.html. Accessed 12 to 18 ounces in cooked weight) of red meat and colon cancer. January 22, 2021. Song, P., L. Wu, and W. Guan. “Dietary Nitrates, Nitrites, and Nitrosamines Intake and the More research is needed in this area. Risk of Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.” Nutrients 7, no. 12 (2015): 9872–95. What does this mean for Pennsylvanians? In 2017 there were U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2020– 2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov/. January 2021. 6,579 new cases of colorectal cancer in Pennsylvania. That means Van Horn, L., et al. “Recommended Dietary Pattern to Achieve Adherence to the American that for every 100,000 people, 39 colorectal cancer cases were Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) Guidelines: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association.” Circulation 134 (2016): e505–29. reported. Approximately one out of every 23 Pennsylvanians will “WHO Report Says Eating Processed Meat Is Carcinogenic: Understanding the Findings.” Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, November 3, 2015. https://www.hsph.harvard develop colorectal cancer in their lifetime. There are many causes .edu/nutritionsource/2015/11/03/report-says-eating-processed-meat-is-carcinogenic- of colorectal cancer, but one way to decrease your risk is to limit understanding-the-findings/. Accessed August 29, 2018. World Health Organization. “Cancer: Carcinogenicity of the Consumption of Red Meat and or moderate your consumption of processed and red meats in Processed Meat.” October 26, 2015. https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/cancer- your diet. carcinogenicity-of-the-consumption-of-red-meat-and-processed-meat. Accessed January 22, 2021. The bottom line: Minimize the amount of processed meats Prepared by Stacy Reed, senior extension educator. Reviewed by Cindy Javor, extension educator, and (lunch meat, bacon, hot dogs, etc.) you eat and limit your intake Susan Veldheer of the Penn State Cancer Institute. of red meats. If you eat red meat, try lean cuts of meat and eat This information is brought to you as part of the Cancer Prevention in Pennsylvania Initiative, a smaller portions. Eating red and processed meats in moderation collaboration between Penn State Extension and the Penn State Cancer Institute. will not cause a major health risk if your overall diet is rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and high-quality proteins like extension.psu.edu nuts, legumes (peas and beans), skinless poultry, fat-free and Penn State College of Agricultural Sciences research and extension programs are funded in part by low-fat dairy, seeds, and fish. Other ways to reduce your risk Pennsylvania counties, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Where trade names appear, no discrimination is intended, and no endorsement by the Penn State College of cancer are to get regular physical activity, avoid tobacco, and of Agricultural Sciences is implied. limit how much alcohol you drink. This publication is available in alternative media on request. Penn State is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer, and is committed to providing employ- ment opportunities to all qualified applicants without regard to race, color, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, disability, or protected veteran status. © The Pennsylvania State University 2021 Code EE0441 1/21pod - 2 -.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • To Eat Or Not to Eat Red Meat. a Closer Look at the Relationship Between Restrained Eating and Vegetarianism in College Females
    W&M ScholarWorks Psychological Sciences Articles & Book Chapters Psychological Sciences Fall 11-2-2011 To eat or not to eat red meat. A closer look at the relationship between restrained eating and vegetarianism in college females Catherine A. Forestell College of William and Mary, [email protected] Andrea M. Spaeth College of William and Mary Stephanie A. Kane College of William and Mary Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/psychologypub Part of the Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Forestell, Catherine A.; Spaeth, Andrea M.; and Kane, Stephanie A., To eat or not to eat red meat. A closer look at the relationship between restrained eating and vegetarianism in college females (2011). Appetite, 58(1), 319-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2011.10.015 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Psychological Sciences at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Psychological Sciences Articles & Book Chapters by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Our reference: APPET 1355 P-authorquery-v10 AUTHOR QUERY FORM Journal: APPET Please e-mail or fax your responses and any corrections to: E-mail: [email protected] Article Number: 1355 Fax: +31 2048 52799 Dear Author, Please check your proof carefully and mark all corrections at the appropriate place in the proof (e.g., by using on-screen annotation in the PDF file) or compile them in a separate list. Note: if you opt to annotate the file with software other than Adobe Reader then please also highlight the appropriate place in the PDF file.
    [Show full text]
  • REDUCTION of PURINE CONTENT in COMMONLY CONSUMED MEAT PRODUCTS THROUGH RINSING and COOKING by Anna Ellington (Under the Directio
    REDUCTION OF PURINE CONTENT IN COMMONLY CONSUMED MEAT PRODUCTS THROUGH RINSING AND COOKING by Anna Ellington (Under the direction of Yen-Con Hung) Abstract The commonly consumed meat products ground beef, ground turkey, and bacon were analyzed for purine content before and after a rinsing treatment. The rinsing treatment involved rinsing the meat samples using a wrist shaker in 5:1 ratio water: sample for 2 or 5 minutes then draining or centrifuging to remove water. The total purine content of 25% fat ground beef significantly decreased (p<0.05) from 8.58 mg/g protein to a range of 5.17-7.26 mg/g protein after rinsing treatments. After rinsing and cooking an even greater decrease was seen ranging from 4.59-6.32 mg/g protein. The total purine content of 7% fat ground beef significantly decreased from 7.80 mg/g protein to a range of 5.07-5.59 mg/g protein after rinsing treatments. A greater reduction was seen after rinsing and cooking in the range of 4.38-5.52 mg/g protein. Ground turkey samples showed no significant changes after rinsing, but significant decreases were seen after rinsing and cooking. Bacon samples showed significant decreases from 6.06 mg/g protein to 4.72 and 4.49 after 2 and 5 minute rinsing and to 4.53 and 4.68 mg/g protein after 2 and 5 minute rinsing and cooking. Overall, this study showed that rinsing foods in water effectively reduces total purine content and subsequent cooking after rinsing results in an even greater reduction of total purine content.
    [Show full text]
  • Using of Horsemeat As an Additional Source of Raw Materials for Expanding the Range of Meat Products
    38 Specialized and multidisciplinary scientific researches Volume 2 . DOI 10.36074/11.12.2020.v2.10 USING OF HORSEMEAT AS AN ADDITIONAL SOURCE OF RAW MATERIALS FOR EXPANDING THE RANGE OF MEAT PRODUCTS ORCID ID: 0000-0002-6591-0414 Ihor Strashynskyi Ph.D, Associate Professor, Associate Professor Departmentof Meat and Meat Products Technology National University of Food Technologies ORCID ID: 0000-0002-8816-0388 Oksana Fursik Assistant Departmentof Meat and Meat ProductsTechnology Educational and Scientific Institute of Food Technologies National University of Food Technologies UKRAINE Today, due to the extensive development of intensive industrial growing of farm animals, such as poultry, pigs and, to a lesser extent, cattle, the production of horse meat almost all over the world, with the exception countries and regions with traditionally developed herd horse breeding, is inferior to the production of these animals meat and it is mainly used in the manufacture certain varieties of sausages to improve the structural and mechanical properties of finished products, as well as their piquant taste. There are regions in the world where horse meat is widely used as the main meat food product. Horse meat is now available in France, Belgium and Sweden, where horse meat sales outnumber mutton meat sales. In France, horse meat consumption is 0.4% of all meat consumed. There are about 750 horse meat butchers in the country and about 11,000 farmers who raise horses for sale for meat. The main part of horse meat products that produced in France are exported to Italy. Italians consume twice as much horse meat as the French and love the meat of young horses, while the French prefer red meat from older horses [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Don't Fall for Tricky Meat & Poultry Claims
    Lean? here do Wthe bro- chures, posters, and voluntary labels for meat get their num- bers? In most Don’t fall for tricky meat cases, from the USDA’s data- & poultry claims base. And where does the USDA BY LINDSAY MOYER & JENNIFER URBAN gets its numbers? 0" trim? Fat chance. It’s no secret that Americans need to cut back on meat. While we Mostly from, or now eat more chicken than beef, we still eat too much red meat, with funding from, the beef and pork industries. Hmm... especially beef. That’s bad news for our health and for the planet. The USDA’s database has numbers for beef that has had People who eat more red meat—especially processed meat—have the fat around its edges trimmed down to just ⁄8” or 0”. a higher risk of colon cancer, heart disease, and stroke. (The pork industry never even says how much its cuts were trimmed.) And it doesn’t help that misleading information about meat or The USDA also has numbers for what’s called “separable poultry can trick even the most careful shoppers. Here’s what to lean.” That’s after scalpel-wielding technicians trim off the watch out for. “separable fat”—every bit of fat except marbling within the muscle. Missing labels? All that trimming (where do you keep your scalpel?) helps explain how the beef industry’s website can end up touting voluntarily, you’re 38 cuts of “lean” beef. The list even includes fatty cuts like stuck with a brochure New York strip steak and brisket.
    [Show full text]
  • Variation of Amino Acids in White and Red Meat of Skipjack Tuna (Katsuwonus Pelamis) Caught from Arabian Sea
    ISSN: 2319-8753 International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology Vol. 2, Issue 7, July 2013 VARIATION OF AMINO ACIDS IN WHITE AND RED MEAT OF SKIPJACK TUNA (KATSUWONUS PELAMIS) CAUGHT FROM ARABIAN SEA Remya James1, Vineeth Kumar T V2 Assistant Professor, Department of Zoology, St. Joseph‟s College for Women, Alappuzha, Kerala, India1 Research Scholar, Chemical Biology Laboratory, Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India2 Abstract: Amino acid profile of the white and red (dark) meat in Katsuwonus pelamis, a tuna fish, caught from Arabian Sea in the month of January, was estimated using gas chromatography. There was no significant variation between red and white meat samples for the total percentage of essential and non-essential amino acids which constitute 52.3% and 47.7% respectively. Non essential amino acids asparagine and glutamine, and semi essential amino acid cysteine were not detected in both, red meat and white meat samples. Glutamate makes up approximately 13% in both samples which can be considered the highest. Certain individual amino acids, histidine, lysine and arginine showed variation between red and white meat samples. Keywords: red meat; white meat; amino acid; lysine; Katsuwonus pelamis I. INTRODUCTION Fish protein, like that of meat, is easily digestible and favorably complements dietary protein provided by beef, pork, chicken, cereals and legumes that are typically consumed in many developing countries (Winton and Winton, 2000). The protein in fish makes up complete protein source and tuna is a good source of high quality proteins. Tuna have white flesh and flesh that is pink to dark red.
    [Show full text]
  • A Prospective Study of Red Meat Consumption and Type 2 Diabetes in Middle-Aged and Elderly Women the Women’S Health Study
    Epidemiology/Health Services/Psychosocial Research ORIGINAL ARTICLE A Prospective Study of Red Meat Consumption and Type 2 Diabetes in Middle-Aged and Elderly Women The Women’s Health Study 1,2 1,2,4 YIQING SONG, MD JULIE E. BURING, SCD suspected as an important and indepen- 1,2,3 1,2 JOANN E. MANSON, MD, DRPH SIMIN LIU, MD, SCD dent contributor to risk of type 2 diabetes. This hypothesis was first generated based on the evidence from ecologic and mi- grant studies (2,3) and subsequently sup- OBJECTIVE — The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the relation between red ported by several cross-sectional and meat intake and incidence of type 2 diabetes. prospective studies of dietary patterns and diabetes (4–6). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS — Over an average of 8.8 years, we evaluated Since the Seventh Day Adventists 37,309 participants in the Women’s Health Study aged Ն45 years who were free of cardiovas- Study first reported a positive association cular disease, cancer, and type 2 diabetes and completed validated semiquantitative food fre- between total meat intake and risk of type quency questionnaires in 1993. 2 diabetes in a population with a large proportion of vegetarians (7), few studies RESULTS — During 326,876 person-years of follow-up, we documented 1,558 incident have specifically assessed this relation be- cases of type 2 diabetes. After adjusting for age, BMI, total energy intake, exercise, alcohol intake, cigarette smoking, and family history of diabetes, we found positive associations between intakes tween meat consumption and incidence of red meat and processed meat and risk of type 2 diabetes.
    [Show full text]
  • Biomarkers of Meat and Seafood Intake: an Extensive Literature Review Cătălina Cuparencu1*† , Giulia Praticó1†, Lieselot Y
    Cuparencu et al. Genes & Nutrition (2019) 14:35 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12263-019-0656-4 REVIEW Open Access Biomarkers of meat and seafood intake: an extensive literature review Cătălina Cuparencu1*† , Giulia Praticó1†, Lieselot Y. Hemeryck2†, Pedapati S. C. Sri Harsha3†, Stefania Noerman4, Caroline Rombouts2, Muyao Xi1, Lynn Vanhaecke2, Kati Hanhineva4, Lorraine Brennan3 and Lars O. Dragsted1 Abstract Meat, including fish and shellfish, represents a valuable constituent of most balanced diets. Consumption of different types of meat and fish has been associated with both beneficial and adverse health effects. While white meats and fish are generally associated with positive health outcomes, red and especially processed meats have been associated with colorectal cancer and other diseases. The contribution of these foods to the development or prevention of chronic diseases is still not fully elucidated. One of the main problems is the difficulty in properly evaluating meat intake, as the existing self-reporting tools for dietary assessment may be imprecise and therefore affected by systematic and random errors. Dietary biomarkers measured in biological fluids have been proposed as possible objective measurements of the actual intake of specific foods and as a support for classical assessment methods. Good biomarkers for meat intake should reflect total dietary intake of meat, independent of source or processing and should be able to differentiate meat consumption from that of other protein-rich foods; alternatively, meat intake biomarkers should be specific to each of the different meat sources (e.g., red vs. white; fish, bird, or mammal) and/or cooking methods. In this paper, we present a systematic investigation of the scientific literature while providing a comprehensive overview of the possible biomarker(s) for the intake of different types of meat, including fish and shellfish, and processed and heated meats according to published guidelines for biomarker reviews (BFIrev).
    [Show full text]
  • Red Meat and Health Getting to the Heart of the Matter
    1.0 CPEUs and 1.0 ANCC Contact Hour Red Meat and Health Getting to the Heart of the Matter Lauren E. O’Connor, BS Wayne W. Campbell, PhD Consumption of red meat in the United States has pro- diabetes annually, with 90% of those cases being type 2 2 gressively declined over the past 35 years. This occurred in rather than type 1 diabetes. Importantly, CVD-related conjunction with public recommendations to reduce red mortality is 1.7 times more common in adults with diabetes 2 meat intake, based mainly on associations between higher compared with those without diabetes. red meat intake and increased chronic disease risk. This There are adaptable lifestyle practices that can reduce narrative review presents and discusses results from both cardiometabolic disease risk, including consumption of a observational cohort studies that focus on cardiometabolic healthy eating pattern. The Dietary Guidelines for Americans disease development and mortality and randomized con- often recommend reducing red meat consumption (no trolled trials that focus on cardiometabolic disease risk more than approximately 3Y4 servings per week, 2Y3oz factors. This review will also address the potential effect of per serving) to lower cardiometabolic disease risk. There categorizations of red meat and processed meats on our are other potential reasons to consider how much red 4 understanding of cardiometabolic health implications of meat to consume, such as cancer risk and environmental 5 consuming red meat. Nutr Today. 2017;52(4):167Y173 sustainability ; however, this brief narrative review will focus on cardiometabolic disease risk. The purpose of this narrative review is to summarize the evidence about the INTRODUCTION potential implications of consuming higher amounts of red meat on cardiometabolic disease development, re- Cardiometabolic disease risk refers to the chances of de- lated mortality, and the associated risk factors by com- veloping cardiovascular disease (CVD) or type 2 diabetes.
    [Show full text]
  • AICR Info on Red-Processed Meat
    Red Meat NEED MORE HELP? Visit www.aicr.org for more information about diet, physical activity, weight and cancer prevention and survivorship. Or call 1-800-843- 8114 to request additional brochures, including: THE FACTS ABOUT THE RECOMMENDATION How much red meat can you eat? • 10 Ways to Reduce Your Cancer Risk Limit red meat AICR recommends eating no more than • The Cancer Fighters in Your Food Consume less than 18 oz. (cooked) of 18 ounces of red meat per week. This equals: • The New American Plate Red Meat & red meat a week. These and other brochures can be downloaded for free at up to 3 ounces (cooked), about the size • www.aicr.org. You can also visit the AICR Hotline online for answers • Red meat includes beef, pork and lamb. of a deck of cards, 6 times per week; or Processed Meat to your questions about diet and cancer, or call 1-800-843-8114 Monday–Friday, 9 am–5 pm ET. A registered dietitian will return your call. • up to 6 ounces (cooked) 3 times per week. American Institute for Cancer Research THE RESEARCH 1759 R Street, NW, P.O. Box 97167 Washington, DC 20090-7167 A review of all relevant research has shown that 1-800-843-8114 or 202-328-7744 diets high in red meat are linked with increased HOW TO CUT DOWN • Eating red meat and About AICR • risk of colorectal cancer. ON RED MEAT • processed meat increases OUR VISION: We want to live in a world where no one develops a • There seems to be an important threshold: preventable cancer.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation and Consumer Interest in an Antioxidant-Enriched Ham Associated with Reduced Colorectal Cancer Risks
    nutrients Article Regulation and Consumer Interest in an Antioxidant-Enriched Ham Associated with Reduced Colorectal Cancer Risks Stéphan Marette 1,*, Françoise Guéraud 2 and Fabrice Pierre 2 1 University Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, UMR Economie Publique, 78850 Grignon, France 2 Toxalim (Research Centre in Food Toxicology), Toulouse University, INRAE UMR 1331, ENVT, INP-Purpan, UPS, 31300 Toulouse, France; [email protected] (F.G.); [email protected] (F.P.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: An economic experiment was conducted in France in 2020 to evaluate consumer attitudes toward two ham products associated with different colorectal cancer risks. We focused specifically on comparing a conventional ham and a new hypothetical antioxidant-enriched ham with a reduced risk of provoking colorectal cancer. Study participants were given descriptions of the two hams before carrying out successive rounds of willingness-to-pay (WTP) assessments. The results show that WTP was higher for the antioxidant-enriched ham than for the conventional ham. WTP estimates were also impacted by providing additional information about the reduction in colorectal cancer risk associated with the antioxidant-enriched ham. Based on the participants’ WTP, we came up with ex ante estimates for the social impacts of introducing the antioxidant-enriched ham onto the market, and we suggest that it would be socially optimal to promote the product. Competition arising from pre-existing product labelling and marketing assertions could greatly limit the market potential of antioxidant-enriched ham, which suggests that alternative approaches may be necessary, such as regulations mandating antioxidant enrichment. These results also concern all countries with high Citation: Marette, S.; Guéraud, F.; levels of meat consumption.
    [Show full text]
  • Limit Red Meat Pork, Lamb, Deer, Buffalo and Beef, Including Eat No More Than 18 Ounces of Cooked Hamburgers, Red Meat Per Week
    Limit red meat Pork, lamb, deer, buffalo and beef, including Eat no more than 18 ounces of cooked hamburgers, red meat per week. Red meat contains are all red meat. substances that have been linked to colorectal cancer. Here’s what 18 ounces looks like broken down into multiple servings for the week. 8 golf balls 2.25 ounces per serving 6 decks of cards 3 ounces per serving 4 tennis balls 4.5 ounces per serving 2 softballs 9 ounces per serving Try these healthier protein options. • Plant proteins such as beans, legumes and tofu • Chicken and fish • Low-fat dairy foods such as yogurt and skim milk www.mdanderson.org/food © The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center November 2019 | 713-792-3363 Avoid processed meat Cancer-causing substances form when processed meats are preserved. Eating these meats can damage your DNA, raising your colorectal cancer risk. R Choose healthier protein options • Chicken or turkey breast (baked, grilled or roasted, but not smoked) • Fish (baked or grilled) • Plant proteins such as beans, legumes and soy Q Avoid these items • Bacon • Packaged These meats have been lunch meat • Sausage preserved by smoking, curing • Deli meat or salting, or have added • Hot dogs • Salami chemical preservatives. • Pepperoni • Roast beef • Smoked or Nitrate-free or uncured meats cured ham • Bratwurst can still form small amounts of cancer-causing substances • Pastrami • Corned beef in your body. www.mdanderson.org/food.
    [Show full text]
  • By-Products of Tuna Processing 00153 Rome, Italy Tel.: +39 06 5705 4744 Fax: +39 06 5705 3020 Volume 112
    GLOBEFISH RESEARCH PROGRAMME Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Products, Trade and Marketing Service Viale delle Terme di Caracalla By-products of tuna processing 00153 Rome, Italy Tel.: +39 06 5705 4744 Fax: +39 06 5705 3020 www.globefish.org Volume 112 By-products of tuna processing by Ms Esther Garrido Gamarro Mr Wanchai Orawattanamateekul Ms Joelyn Sentina Dr T. K. Srinivasa Gopal (July, 2013) The GLOBEFISH Research Programme is an activity initiated by FAO's Products, Trade and Marketing Branch, Fisheries and Aquaculture Policy and Economics Division, Rome, Italy and financed jointly by: - NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service), Washington, DC, USA - Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente, Subdirección General de Economía Pesquera, Madrid, Spain - Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, Copenhagen, Denmark - European Commission, Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, Brussels, EU - Norwegian Seafood Council, Tromsoe, Norway - FranceAgriMer, Montreuil-sous-Bois, Cedex, France - ASMI (Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute), USA - Sea Fish Industry Authority, United Kingdom Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, GLOBEFISH, Products, Trade and Marketing Branch, Fisheries and Aquaculture Policy and Economics Division Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy - Tel: (39) 06570 54163 E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] - Fax: (39) 06570 53020 - www.globefish.org The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]