Upland Oakwood (Uk Bap Priority Habitat)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Upland Oakwood (Uk Bap Priority Habitat) UPLAND OAKWOOD (UK BAP PRIORITY HABITAT) Summary This is woodland on well-drained to rather poorly drained, acidic to neutral soils in the upland parts of Britain, where either pedunculate or sessile oak forms at least 30% of the canopy cover. Other tree and shrub species occur commonly, especially downy birch, silver birch, rowan, hazel and holly. Like upland birchwoods, the field layer is mostly grassy or heathy, but when very heavily grazed can be dominated by large bryophytes. Small herbs, bryophytes and ferns, including bracken, can be very common, and on rocks, banks, trees and shrubs in the west there can be a rich flora of oceanic bryophytes including some uncommon species. Most Scottish examples of this priority habitat are on moderate to steep slopes below 300 m, with well drained brown earth or podzol soils. This priority habitat can occur in mosaics with the Upland birchwoods, Upland mixed ashwoods and Wet woodland priority habitats, as well as with open habitats including bracken, heath, cliffs, screes and acid grassland. The habitat is widespread in Scotland and in upland areas of Britain generally. Good management for conservation in this habitat generally aims towards maintaining a good diversity of species, sizes and age classes of trees and shrubs, encouraging diversity in the structure and species composition of the ground vegetation, maintaining rich bryophyte and lichen assemblages on rocks and trees especially in the west, maintaining good quantities of standing and fallen dead wood, and controlling the extent and spread of non-native trees and shrubs, especially rhododendron, Rhododendron ponticum. What is it? This is woodland on well-drained to rather poorly drained, acidic to neutral soils in the upland parts of Britain, where sessile oak Quercus petraea or pedunculate oak Quercus robur forms at least 30% of the canopy cover. Other tree and shrub species occur commonly, especially silver birch Betula pendula, downy birch Betula pubescens, rowan Sorbus aucuparia, hazel Corylus avellana and holly Ilex aquifolium. Most of the Upland oakwood has a field layer which is grassy or heathy. In grassy examples typical species include wavy hair-grass Deschampsia flexuosa, common bent Agrostis capillaris, sweet vernal-grass Anthoxanthum odoratum, tormentil Potentilla erecta and heath bedstraw Galium saxatile. In heathy examples these species can also occur in small quantity but in a sward of ling Calluna vulgaris, bilberry Vaccinium myrtillus or, on some south-facing slopes, bell heather Erica cinerea. The heathy examples are generally on strongly acid soils but moderate to heavy grazing in such places can lead to grassier – or even bryophyte dominated – field layers. On more mildly acid soils the ground flora is less heathy and small herbs are more common including wood sorrel Oxalis acetosella, common dog-violet Viola riviniana and primrose Primula vulgaris. In the damper examples of this priority habitat purple moor-grass Molinia caerulea can be abundant or dominant in the field layer. Bryophytes and ferns are generally common throughout. Typical bryophytes include the mosses Hylocomium splendens, Pleurozium schreberi, Pseudoscleropodium purum, Rhytidiadelphus loreus, R. triquetrus, R. squarrosus, Dicranum majus, D. scoparium, Polytrichastrum formosum and Leucobryum glaucum. Bryophytes are especially plentiful and diverse on the thinner, more acidic soils. Ferns typically include hard fern Blechnum spicant, Dryopteris spp. and bracken Pteridium aquilinum: this last species can be dominant in the field layer on deep brown earth soils. Much of this woodland is on steep slopes where the ground vegetation is broken by rock outcrops and boulders. These rocks generally support an abundance of bryophytes and in some places lichens. Their bryophyte floras are especially luxuriant and varied in the wetter west, where they include several western species such as the mosses Dicranum scottianum and Sematophyllum micans and the liverworts Scapania gracilis, Plagiochila spinulosa, P. atlantica, P. bifaria, P. punctata, Saccogyna viticulosa, Bazzania trilobata, Adelanthus decipiens, Aphanolejeunea microscopica, Drepanolejeunea hamatifolia and Harpalejeunea molleri. The western filmy ferns Wilson’s filmy-fern Hymenophyllum wilsonii and Tunbridge filmy-fern H. tunbrigense, which are small ferns looking more like bryophytes at first glance, also grow in these habitats. The epiphytic floras on oaks and other trees in this priority habitat, especially in the west, can be rich in bryophytes including most of the western species listed above. Lichens of the Lobarion community are a particular characteristic of western woodlands, including large foliose species such as Lobaria pulmonaria, L. scrobiculata, L. virens, L. amplissima, Sticta sylvatica, S. uliginosa, S. limbata, Nephroma laevigatum and Pseudocyphellaria spp. Species of more acid bark, such as Menegazzia terebrata and Hypotrachyna taylorensis, are also often present, along with the many smaller crustose species of the Graphidion community. These communities are better developed in Scotland than anywhere else in Europe. Scottish examples of this priority habitat have much in common with those in the rest of the UK, but compared with those in England and Wales they do not generally extend to such a high altitude and tend to have less bramble and honeysuckle. How do I recognise it? Differentiation from other Priority Habitats Upland birchwoods are the most similar to the Upland oakwood priority habitat in terms of their habitat and ground vegetation, but they have a canopy including abundant to dominant birch and with little or no oak, and are restricted to the Scottish Highlands and Hebridean islands. Stands of birch further south are best regarded as cyclical or successional stages of other types of woodland, especially that belonging to the Upland oakwood priority habitat. Lowland mixed deciduous woodland can have similar ground vegetation and an oak- dominated canopy, but generally much less rich communities of lichens and bryophytes. They generally comprise different NVC types. The only NVC overlap between these two priority habitats is the W16 community: stands of W16 containing oak are treated as Lowland mixed deciduous woodland where they occur in the lowlands but as Upland oakwood where they occur on the upland fringes. The NVC separates Upland mixed ashwoods (W9 and certain examples of W7 and W8) from Upland oakwood which does not include W7-9. The Upland oakwood and Wet woodland priority habitats are largely separable by NVC type, but the W4 community occurs in both. The W4c sub-community is restricted to Wet woodland. The drier W4a sub-community occurs in the Upland oakwood and Upland birchwoods habitats but not in the Wet woodland habitat. In previously published priority habitat definitions, some of the less wet examples of W4b and those which are in mosaics with drier W10e, W11, W16 and W17 woodland are considered to be best placed in the Upland birchwoods or Upland oakwood priority habitats, depending on location and canopy as described above. However, typical W4b is as wet as many other NVC communities in the Wet woodland priority habitat and is clearly different from the drier W10, W11 and W17 communities: this might suggest keeping it within the Wet woodland habitat. Using patch size as a guide is a useful approach such that a small area of W4b within a larger area of W11 would classify as Upland birchwood; whereas if the W4b is largely associated with W4c then it would classify as Wet woodland. Definition in relation to other habitat classifications Classification Habitat types belonging to this UK BAP priority habitat All examples of W4a, W10e, W11 and W17 in which oak forms >30% of the canopy cover. Upland fringe examples of W16 in which oak forms >30% of the canopy cover. NVC Examples of non-NVC ‘WLz’ (with very species-poor Luzula sylvatica ground vegetation) in upland or upland fringe situations, in which oak forms >30% of the canopy cover. (All of the above NVC communities are included in the Scottish Biodiversity List.) A1: oakwood examples of W4a, W10e, W11, W17 and WLz with oak >30% of canopy cover; total canopy cover >30% Phase 1 A2: oak scrub forms of W4a, W10e, W11, W17 and WLz with oak >30% of canopy cover A3: oakwood examples of W4a, W10e, W11, W17 and WLz with oak >30% of canopy cover; total canopy cover <30% A4: recently felled W4a, W10e, W11, W17 and WLz oakwood with oak >30% of canopy cover UK BAP broad All examples of this priority habitat belong to the broad habitat - habitat Broadleaved, mixed and yew woodland NVC communities W11 and W17 account for most of the Upland oakwood in Scotland. The sub-communities W8e/f/g and W10e, and examples of W16 and W8d in the upland fringe, have historically been assigned to Upland priority woodland habitats. However, W8, W10 and W16 are generally lowland communities, and their flora and distribution reflect the influence of a warmer and/or drier lowland climate compared with that of their upland counterparts W9, W11 and W17. It may be preferable to consider all examples of W8/10/16 woodland in lowland Scotland as part of the Lowland Mixed Deciduous woodland habitat. The Native Woodland Survey of Scotland classified woodland to community level only, and included all examples of W8, W10 and W16 within the Lowland mixed deciduous woodland priority habitat. Definition in relation to legislative classifications Classification Habitat types belonging to this UK BAP priority habitat Habitats H91A0 (all occurrences). Directive Annex I SNH SSSI All examples of the Upland oakwood priority habitat belong within habitat features the Upland oak woodland SSSI feature type. Where is it? Most Scottish examples of this priority habitat are on moderate to steep slopes with well drained brown earth or podzol soils. Within larger areas of woodland this priority habitat can occur in mosaics with the Upland birchwoods priority habitat, more flushed areas with the Upland mixed ashwoods priority habitat or wetter areas with the Wet woodland priority habitat.
Recommended publications
  • Species List
    1 of 16 Claypits 20/09/2021 species list Group Taxon Common Name Earliest Latest Records acarine Aceria macrorhyncha 2012 2012 1 acarine Aceria nalepai 2018 2018 1 amphibian Bufo bufo Common Toad 2001 2018 6 amphibian Lissotriton helveticus Palmate Newt 2001 2018 5 amphibian Lissotriton vulgaris Smooth Newt 2001 2001 1 annelid Hirudinea Leech 2011 2011 1 bird Acanthis cabaret Lesser Redpoll 2013 2013 1 bird Acrocephalus schoenobaenus Sedge Warbler 2001 2011 2 bird Aegithalos caudatus Long-tailed Tit 2011 2014 2 bird Alcedo atthis Kingfisher 2020 2020 1 bird Anas platyrhynchos Mallard 2013 2018 4 bird Anser Goose 2011 2011 1 bird Ardea cinerea Grey Heron 2013 2013 1 bird Aythya fuligula Tufted Duck 2013 2014 1 bird Buteo buteo Buzzard 2013 2014 2 bird Carduelis carduelis Goldfinch 2011 2014 5 bird Chloris chloris Greenfinch 2011 2014 6 bird Chroicocephalus ridibundus Black-headed Gull 2014 2014 1 bird Coloeus monedula Jackdaw 2011 2013 2 bird Columba livia Feral Pigeon 2014 2014 1 bird Columba palumbus Woodpigeon 2011 2018 8 bird Corvus corax Raven 2020 2020 1 bird Corvus corone Carrion Crow 2011 2014 5 bird Curruca communis Whitethroat 2011 2014 4 bird Cyanistes caeruleus Blue Tit 2011 2014 6 bird Cygnus olor Mute Swan 2013 2014 4 bird Delichon urbicum House Martin 2011 2011 1 bird Emberiza schoeniclus Reed Bunting 2013 2014 2 bird Erithacus rubecula Robin 2011 2014 7 bird Falco peregrinus Peregrine 2013 2013 1 bird Falco tinnunculus Kestrel 2010 2020 3 bird Fringilla coelebs Chaffinch 2011 2014 7 bird Gallinula chloropus Moorhen 2013
    [Show full text]
  • Phytophthora Ramorum Sudden Oak Death Pathogen
    NAME OF SPECIES: Phytophthora ramorum Sudden Oak Death pathogen Synonyms: Common Name: Sudden Oak Death pathogen A. CURRENT STATUS AND DISTRIBUTION I. In Wisconsin? 1. YES NO X 2. Abundance: 3. Geographic Range: 4. Habitat Invaded: 5. Historical Status and Rate of Spread in Wisconsin: 6. Proportion of potential range occupied: II. Invasive in Similar Climate YES NO X Zones United States: In 14 coastal California Counties and in Curry County, Oregon. In nursery in Washington. Canada: Nursery in British Columbia. Europe: Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Poland, Spain, France, Belgium, and Sweden. III. Invasive in Similar Habitat YES X NO Types IV. Habitat Affected 1. Habitat affected: this disease thrives in cool, wet climates including areas in coastal California within the fog belt or in low- lying forested areas along stream beds and other bodies of water. Oaks associated with understory species that are susceptible to foliar infections are at higher risk of becoming infected. 2. Host plants: Forty-five hosts are regulated for this disease. These hosts have been found naturally infected by P. ramorum and have had Koch’s postulates completed, reviewed and accepted. Approximately fifty-nine species are associated with Phytophthora ramorum. These species are found naturally infected; P. ramorum has been cultured or detected with PCR but Koch’s postulates have not been completed or documented and reviewed. Northern red oak (Quercus rubra) is considered an associated host. See end of document for complete list of plant hosts. National Risk Model and Map shows susceptible forest types in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnosis of Phytophthora Ramorum in Trees
    Diagnosis of PhytophthoraPhytophthora ramorumramorum in Trees by Dr. Kim D. Coder, Warnell School of Forest Resources, University of Georgia April, 2004 The organism shown to be responsible for SOD (sudden oak death) is Phytophthora ramorum, a fungus / yeast-like brown algae. This pathogen generates a number of symptoms in the trees infected. Of the trees and large shrubs shown to be infectable with this pathogen, some species have more serious stem and branch lesions like oaks, while other species have primarily leaf and twig lesions. In a single landscape, multiple hosts can keep the pathogen present for further attacks. This publication was prepared by reviewing approximately 35 research or disease announcement publications in Europe and North America. In addition, a number of factsheets and synthesized informa- tion guides were reviewed for continuity. This publication is designed for field diagnosis of SOD-like symptoms and related symptom sets on community trees. This publication should not be used in tree nursery situations, and is not a pathogen centered review. It is critical to seek pathological expertise and testing for confirming disease organism presence. A selected bibliography is available entitled “Sudden Oak Death – SOD: Bibliography of Important Literature.” (Coder, Kim D. 2004. University of Georgia, Warnell School of Forest Resources outreach publication SFR04-1. 2pp.). Names The tree syndrome or symptom set which characterizes attack by Phytophthora ramorum has common names of “ramorum dieback,” “ramorum blight,” “ramorum twig blight,”“ramorum leaf blight,” “ramorum stem canker,” “blood spot disease,” or “sudden oak death” (SOD). Phytophthora ramorum, and the less virulent Phytophthora nemorosa and Phytophthora pseudosyringae are all relatively new pathogen species recovered from trees which show ramorum blight symptoms.
    [Show full text]
  • CZECH MYCOLOGY Publication of the Czech Scientific Society for Mycology
    CZECH MYCOLOGY Publication of the Czech Scientific Society for Mycology Volume 57 August 2005 Number 1-2 Central European genera of the Boletaceae and Suillaceae, with notes on their anatomical characters Jo s e f Š u t a r a Prosetická 239, 415 01 Tbplice, Czech Republic Šutara J. (2005): Central European genera of the Boletaceae and Suillaceae, with notes on their anatomical characters. - Czech Mycol. 57: 1-50. A taxonomic survey of Central European genera of the families Boletaceae and Suillaceae with tubular hymenophores, including the lamellate Phylloporus, is presented. Questions concerning the delimitation of the bolete genera are discussed. Descriptions and keys to the families and genera are based predominantly on anatomical characters of the carpophores. Attention is also paid to peripheral layers of stipe tissue, whose anatomical structure has not been sufficiently studied. The study of these layers, above all of the caulohymenium and the lateral stipe stratum, can provide information important for a better understanding of relationships between taxonomic groups in these families. The presence (or absence) of the caulohymenium with spore-bearing caulobasidia on the stipe surface is here considered as a significant ge­ neric character of boletes. A new combination, Pseudoboletus astraeicola (Imazeki) Šutara, is proposed. Key words: Boletaceae, Suillaceae, generic taxonomy, anatomical characters. Šutara J. (2005): Středoevropské rody čeledí Boletaceae a Suillaceae, s poznámka­ mi k jejich anatomickým znakům. - Czech Mycol. 57: 1-50. Je předložen taxonomický přehled středoevropských rodů čeledí Boletaceae a. SuiUaceae s rourko- vitým hymenoforem, včetně rodu Phylloporus s lupeny. Jsou diskutovány otázky týkající se vymezení hřibovitých rodů. Popisy a klíče k čeledím a rodům jsou založeny převážně na anatomických znacích plodnic.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings, 18Th Central Hardwood Forest Conference; 2012 March 26-28; Morgantown, WV; Gen
    United States Department of Agriculture Proceedings Forest Service 18th Central Hardwood Northern Research Station Forest Conference General Technical Report NRS-P-117 Morgantown, WV March 26-28, 2012 This document is being published in electronic format only (Web and CD). Any corrections or additions will be posted to the Web site (www.nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs). Cover photo of a morel mushroom by Shawn T. Grushecky, West Virginia University, used with permission. The findings and conclusions of each article in this publication are those of the individual author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the Forest Service. All articles were received in digital format and were edited for uniform type and style. Each author is responsible for the accuracy and content of his or her paper. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for the information and convenience of the reader. Such use does not constitute an official endorsement or approval by the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the Forest Service of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. This publication/database reports research involving pesticides. It does not contain recommendations for their use, nor does it imply that the uses discussed CAUTION: here have been registered. All uses of pesticides must be registered PESTICIDES by appropriate State and/or Federal agencies before they can be recommended. CAUTION: Pesticides can be injurious to humans, domestic animals, desirable plants, and fish or other wildlife—if they are not handled or applied properly.
    [Show full text]
  • Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
    Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Forest Genetic Resources Working Papers State of Forest and Tree Genetic Resources in the Republic of Moldova by Dragos Postolache Botanical Garden (Institute) Academy of Sciences Chisinau, Republic of Moldova 2004 Forest Resources Development Service Working Paper FGR/64E Forest Resources Division FAO, Rome, Italy Disclaimer The Forest Genetic Resources Working Papers report on issues and activities related to the conservation, sustainable use and management of forest genetic resources. The purpose of these papers is to provide early information on on-going activities and programmes, and to stimulate discussion. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Quantitative information regarding the status of forest resources has been compiled according to sources, methodologies and protocols identified and selected by the author, for assessing the diversity and status of genetic resources. For standardized methodologies and assessments on forest resources, please refer to FAO, 2003. State of the World’s Forests 2003 ; and to FAO, 2001. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000 (FRA2000). FAO Forestry Paper No 140 . Information can also be found at the FAO-Forestry Internet site (http://www.fao.org/forestry/Forestry.asp ). Comments and feedback are welcome. For further information please contact: Pierre Sigaud, Forestry Officer (Forest Genetic Resources) Forest Resources Division Forestry Department FAO, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla 00100 Rome, Italy Fax: +39 06 570 55 137 [email protected] For quotation: Postolache, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Lichens and Associated Fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska
    The Lichenologist (2020), 52,61–181 doi:10.1017/S0024282920000079 Standard Paper Lichens and associated fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska Toby Spribille1,2,3 , Alan M. Fryday4 , Sergio Pérez-Ortega5 , Måns Svensson6, Tor Tønsberg7, Stefan Ekman6 , Håkon Holien8,9, Philipp Resl10 , Kevin Schneider11, Edith Stabentheiner2, Holger Thüs12,13 , Jan Vondrák14,15 and Lewis Sharman16 1Department of Biological Sciences, CW405, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2R3, Canada; 2Department of Plant Sciences, Institute of Biology, University of Graz, NAWI Graz, Holteigasse 6, 8010 Graz, Austria; 3Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, Montana 59812, USA; 4Herbarium, Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA; 5Real Jardín Botánico (CSIC), Departamento de Micología, Calle Claudio Moyano 1, E-28014 Madrid, Spain; 6Museum of Evolution, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 16, SE-75236 Uppsala, Sweden; 7Department of Natural History, University Museum of Bergen Allégt. 41, P.O. Box 7800, N-5020 Bergen, Norway; 8Faculty of Bioscience and Aquaculture, Nord University, Box 2501, NO-7729 Steinkjer, Norway; 9NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway; 10Faculty of Biology, Department I, Systematic Botany and Mycology, University of Munich (LMU), Menzinger Straße 67, 80638 München, Germany; 11Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK; 12Botany Department, State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany; 13Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK; 14Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, 252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic; 15Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic and 16Glacier Bay National Park & Preserve, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genus Imleria (Boletaceae) in East Asia
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279035305 The genus Imleria (Boletaceae) in East Asia Article in Phytotaxa · December 2014 DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.191.1.5 CITATIONS READS 4 180 8 authors, including: Gang wu Bang Feng Chinese Academy of Sciences Chinese Academy of Sciences 25 PUBLICATIONS 164 CITATIONS 80 PUBLICATIONS 245 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Gerhard Kost Philipps University of Marburg 45 PUBLICATIONS 897 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Biodiversity and Biogeography of Boletes View project Available from: Gang wu Retrieved on: 21 November 2016 Phytotaxa 191 (1): 081–098 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.191.1.5 The genus Imleria (Boletaceae) in East Asia XUE-TAI ZHU1,2, YAN-CHUN LI1, GANG WU1,2, BANG FENG1, KUAN ZHAO1,2, MATTEO GELARDI3, GERHARD W. KOST4 & ZHU L. YANG1* 1Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kun- ming 650201, Yunnan, China 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 3Via Traversa della Selciatella 2B, I-00062 Bracciano, RM, Italy 4Systematic Botany & Mycology, FB17, Philipps-University Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany *e-mail: [email protected] Abstract The genus Imleria can be easily distinguished from other genera of Boletaceae by the combination of the following charac- ters: a chestnut brown pileus and stipe, a cream to pale yellow hymenophore, a viscid pileal surface when moist, a cyanescent context and hymenophore on handling or exposure, an ixotrichodermal pileipellis and smooth spores.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Classification of Acidophilous Oak Forestsin Slovakia
    Tuexenia 40: 33–52. Göttingen 2020. doi: 10.14471/2020.40.010, available online at www.zobodat.at Vegetation classification of acidophilous oak forests in Slovakia Vegetationsklassifikation bodensaurer Eichenwälder in der Slowakei Michal Slezák1, 2, * , Milan Valachovič3, , Drahoš Blanár4, František Máliš5, 6 , Dušan Senko3 & Hubert Žarnovičan7 1Institute of Forest Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Ľ. Štúra 2, 950 53 Zvolen, Slovakia; 2Podtatranské museum in Poprad, Vajanského 72/4, 058 01 Poprad, Slovakia; 3Institute of Botany, Plant Science and Biodiversity Center, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 23 Bratislava, Slovakia; 4Administration of the Muránska planina National Park, J, Kráľa 12, 050 01 Revúca, Slovakia; 5Department of Phytology, Faculty of Forestry, Technical University in Zvolen, T. G. Masaryka 24, 960 01 Zvolen, Slovakia; 6National Forest Centre, Forest Research Institute Zvolen, T. G. Masaryka 22, 960 01 Zvolen, Slovakia; 7Department of Landscape Ecology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Mlynská dolina, Ilkovičova 6, 842 15 Bratislava, Slovakia *Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract Acidophilous oak forests are species-poor forest plant communities usually growing on mineral- poor geological and soil substrates. We compiled a large data set of 263 phytosociological relevés assigned to the Quercion roboris alliance in Slovakia to produce the first syntaxonomical revision at national level. Modified Twinspan algorithm was applied for numerical classification and
    [Show full text]
  • Xerocomus S. L. in the Light of the Present State of Knowledge
    CZECH MYCOL. 60(1): 29–62, 2008 Xerocomus s. l. in the light of the present state of knowledge JOSEF ŠUTARA Prosetická 239, 415 01 Teplice, Czech Republic [email protected] Šutara J. (2008): Xerocomus s. l. in the light of the present state of knowledge. – Czech Mycol. 60(1): 29–62. The definition of the generic limits of Xerocomus s. l. and particularly the delimitation of this genus from Boletus is very unclear and controversial. During his study of European species of the Boletaceae, the author has come to the conclusion that Xerocomus in a wide concept is a heterogeneous mixture of several groups of species. These groups are separated from each other by different anatomical and some other characters. Also recent molecular studies show that Xerocomus s. l. is not a monophyletic group. In agreement with these facts, the European species of Xerocomus s. l. whose anatomy was studied by the present author are here classified into the following, more distinctly delimited genera: Xerocomus s. str., Phylloporus, Xerocomellus gen. nov., Hemileccinum gen. nov. and Pseudoboletus. Boletus badius and Boletus moravicus, also often treated as species of Xerocomus, are retained for the present in the genus Boletus. The differences between Xerocomus s. str., Phylloporus, Xerocomellus, Hemileccinum, Pseudoboletus and Boletus (which is related to this group of genera) are discussed in detail. Two new genera, Xerocomellus and Hemileccinum, and necessary new combinations of species names are proposed. Key words: Boletaceae, Xerocomus, Xerocomellus, Hemileccinum, generic taxonomy, anatomy, histology. Šutara J. (2008): Rod Xerocomus s. l. ve světle současného stavu znalostí. – Czech Mycol.
    [Show full text]
  • AR TICLE New Sequestrate Fungi from Guyana: Jimtrappea Guyanensis
    IMA FUNGUS · 6(2): 297–317 (2015) doi:10.5598/imafungus.2015.06.02.03 New sequestrate fungi from Guyana: Jimtrappea guyanensis gen. sp. nov., ARTICLE Castellanea pakaraimophila gen. sp. nov., and Costatisporus cyanescens gen. sp. nov. (Boletaceae, Boletales) Matthew E. Smith1, Kevin R. Amses2, Todd F. Elliott3, Keisuke Obase1, M. Catherine Aime4, and Terry W. Henkel2 1Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA 2Department of Biological Sciences, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA 95521, USA; corresponding author email: Terry.Henkel@humboldt. edu 3Department of Integrative Studies, Warren Wilson College, Asheville, NC 28815, USA 4Department of Botany & Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA Abstract: Jimtrappea guyanensis gen. sp. nov., Castellanea pakaraimophila gen. sp. nov., and Costatisporus Key words: cyanescens gen. sp. nov. are described as new to science. These sequestrate, hypogeous fungi were collected Boletineae in Guyana under closed canopy tropical forests in association with ectomycorrhizal (ECM) host tree genera Caesalpinioideae Dicymbe (Fabaceae subfam. Caesalpinioideae), Aldina (Fabaceae subfam. Papilionoideae), and Pakaraimaea Dipterocarpaceae (Dipterocarpaceae). Molecular data place these fungi in Boletaceae (Boletales, Agaricomycetes, Basidiomycota) ectomycorrhizal fungi and inform their relationships to other known epigeous and sequestrate taxa within that family. Macro- and gasteroid fungi micromorphological characters, habitat, and multi-locus DNA sequence data are provided for each new taxon. Guiana Shield Unique morphological features and a molecular phylogenetic analysis of 185 taxa across the order Boletales justify the recognition of the three new genera. Article info: Submitted: 31 May 2015; Accepted: 19 September 2015; Published: 2 October 2015. INTRODUCTION 2010, Gube & Dorfelt 2012, Lebel & Syme 2012, Ge & Smith 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Piedmont Lichen Inventory
    PIEDMONT LICHEN INVENTORY: BUILDING A LICHEN BIODIVERSITY BASELINE FOR THE PIEDMONT ECOREGION OF NORTH CAROLINA, USA By Gary B. Perlmutter B.S. Zoology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA 1991 A Thesis Submitted to the Staff of The North Carolina Botanical Garden University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Advisor: Dr. Johnny Randall As Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements For the Certificate in Native Plant Studies 15 May 2009 Perlmutter – Piedmont Lichen Inventory Page 2 This Final Project, whose results are reported herein with sections also published in the scientific literature, is dedicated to Daniel G. Perlmutter, who urged that I return to academia. And to Theresa, Nichole and Dakota, for putting up with my passion in lichenology, which brought them from southern California to the Traingle of North Carolina. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………….4 Chapter I: The North Carolina Lichen Checklist…………………………………………………7 Chapter II: Herbarium Surveys and Initiation of a New Lichen Collection in the University of North Carolina Herbarium (NCU)………………………………………………………..9 Chapter III: Preparatory Field Surveys I: Battle Park and Rock Cliff Farm……………………13 Chapter IV: Preparatory Field Surveys II: State Park Forays…………………………………..17 Chapter V: Lichen Biota of Mason Farm Biological Reserve………………………………….19 Chapter VI: Additional Piedmont Lichen Surveys: Uwharrie Mountains…………………...…22 Chapter VII: A Revised Lichen Inventory of North Carolina Piedmont …..…………………...23 Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………………..72 Appendices………………………………………………………………………………….…..73 Perlmutter – Piedmont Lichen Inventory Page 4 INTRODUCTION Lichens are composite organisms, consisting of a fungus (the mycobiont) and a photosynthesising alga and/or cyanobacterium (the photobiont), which together make a life form that is distinct from either partner in isolation (Brodo et al.
    [Show full text]