DOCSLIB.ORG

Proceedings, 18Th Central Hardwood Forest Conference; 2012 March 26-28; Morgantown, WV; Gen

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Proceedings, 18Th Central Hardwood Forest Conference; 2012 March 26-28; Morgantown, WV; Gen United States Department of Agriculture Proceedings Forest Service 18th Central Hardwood Northern Research Station Forest Conference General Technical Report NRS-P-117 Morgantown, WV March 26-28, 2012 This document is being published in electronic format only (Web and CD). Any corrections or additions will be posted to the Web site (www.nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs). Cover photo of a morel mushroom by Shawn T. Grushecky, West Virginia University, used with permission. The findings and conclusions of each article in this publication are those of the individual author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the Forest Service. All articles were received in digital format and were edited for uniform type and style. Each author is responsible for the accuracy and content of his or her paper. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for the information and convenience of the reader. Such use does not constitute an official endorsement or approval by the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the Forest Service of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. This publication/database reports research involving pesticides. It does not contain recommendations for their use, nor does it imply that the uses discussed CAUTION: here have been registered. All uses of pesticides must be registered PESTICIDES by appropriate State and/or Federal agencies before they can be recommended. CAUTION: Pesticides can be injurious to humans, domestic animals, desirable plants, and fish or other wildlife—if they are not handled or applied properly. Use all pesticides selectively and carefully. Follow recommended practices for the disposal of surplus pesticides and pesticide containers. Manuscript received for publication January 2013 Published by: For additional copies: U.S. FOREST SERVICE U.S. Forest Service 11 CAMPUS BLVD SUITE 200 Publications Distribution NEWTOWN SQUARE PA 19073 359 Main Road Delaware, OH 43015-8640 Fax: (740)368-0152 July 2013 Email: [email protected] Visit our homepage at: http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/ 18th CENTRAL HARDWOOD FOREST CONFERENCE Proceedings of a Conference held at West Virginia University Morgantown, West Virginia March 26-28, 2012 Edited by: Gary W. Miller, U.S. Forest Service Th omas M. Schuler, U.S. Forest Service Kurt W. Gottschalk, U.S. Forest Service John R. Brooks, West Virginia University Shawn T. Grushecky, West Virginia University Ben D. Spong, West Virginia University James S. Rentch, West Virginia University Sponsored by: West Virginia University Division of Forestry and Natural Resources U.S. Forest Service, Northern Research Station FOREWORD Th e Central Hardwood Forest Conference is a series of biennial meetings dedicated to the sustainability and improvement of Central Hardwood forest ecosystems. Th e objective of the conference is to bring together forest managers and scientists to discuss research and issues concerning the ecology and management of forests in the Central Hardwood region. Th e conference has been hosted by diff erent institutes across the region. Th e18t Central Hardwood Forest Conference was hosted by the Division of Forestry and Natural Resources of West Virginia University, and the Northern Research Station of the U.S. Forest Service. Th e conference includes presentations pertaining to biofuels and bioenergy, forest biometrics, forest ecology and physiology, forest economics, forest health including invasive species, forest soils and hydrology, geographic information systems, harvesting and utilization, silviculture, and wildlife management. Th e conference consisted of 54 oral presentations, resulting in 44 papers and 10 presentation abstracts as well as 31 poster presentations and associated abstracts published herein. Th e 19t Central Hardwood Forest Conference (2014) will be hosted by Southern Illinois University and the Northern Research Station; and the 20t Central Hardwood Forest Conference (2016) has been proposed to be hosted by Th e Pennsylvania State University and the Northern Research Station. STEERING COMMITTEE SUBJECT MATTER REVIEWERS Co-chairs: Kurt W. Gottschalk, U.S. Forest Service John R. Brooks, West Virginia University Gary W. Miller, U.S. Forest Service Kurt W. Gottschalk, U.S. Forest Service Th omas M. Schuler, U.S. Forest Service Patrick C. Tobin, U.S. Forest Service Committee members: Gary W. Miller, U.S. Forest Service Kathryn G. Arano, West Virginia University Th omas M. Schuler, U.S. Forest Service John R. Brooks, West Virginia University Patrick C. Tobin, U.S. Forest Service John W. Edwards, West Virginia University Shawn T. Grushecky, West Virginia University Kathryn G. Arano, West Virginia University Sheldon F. Owen, West Virginia University Shawn T. Grushecky, West Virginia University James S. Rentch, West Virginia University Sheldon F. Owen, West Virginia University Ben D. Spong, West Virginia University James S. Rentch, West Virginia University Nicolas P. Zegre, West Virginia University Ben D. Spong, West Virginia University Jingxin Wang, West Virginia University Nicolas P. Zegre, West Virginia University REVIEW PROCEDURES A double-blind review process was used in reviewing manuscripts for oral presentations. Each manuscript was assigned to one of the subject matter reviewers and peer-reviewed by at least two professionals. Reviews were returned to authors to revise their manuscripts. Revised manuscripts were then submitted to the Northern Research Station, U.S. Forest Service for fi nal editing and publishing. Th e conference editorial committee returned some of the manuscripts to the authors as being more appropriate for other outlets. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Th e Steering Committee wishes to thank all the professionals who assisted in reviewing the manuscripts for the proceedings. Th e Steering Committee is grateful to Susan Wright and other members of the Northern Research Station communications group for technical editing and publishing of these proceedings. Th anks also go to Toni Jones and Veronica Maxwell of the U.S. Forest Service in Morgantown, WV, and Joyce Coleman in Princeton, WV, for assistance with conference logistics and preparation of the proceedings. Cindy Gaspie, Karrie Ditmore, and Shane Closkey with the WVU Division of Forestry and Natural Resources were instrumental in the planning and hosting of the conference. Special thanks go to the staff of the Appalachian Hardwood Center at West Virginia University for their assistance in the planning and coordination of the 18t Central Hardwood Forest Conference. HISTORY OF THE CENTRAL HARDWOOD FOREST CONFERENCE Th is Conference is the 18t in a series of biennial meetings that have been hosted by numerous universities and USDA Forest Service Research Stations in the Central Hardwood Forest Region including: 1976 Southern Illinois University 1978 Purdue University 1980 University of Missouri 1982 University of Kentucky 1985 University of Illinois 1987 University of Tennessee 1989 Southern Illinois University and the North Central Forest Experiment Station 1991 Pennsylvania State University and the Northeastern Forest Experiment Station 1993 Purdue University and the North Central Forest Experiment Station 1995 Northeastern Forest Experiment Station and West Virginia University 1997 University of Missouri and the North Central Forest Experiment Station 1999 University of Kentucky and the Southern Research Station 2002 University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign and the North Central Research Station 2004 Ohio State University, Wooster and the Northeastern Research Station 2006 University of Tennessee, Knoxville and the Southern Research Station 2008 Purdue University and the Northern Research Station 2010 University of Kentucky and the Northern Research Station CONTENTS KEYNOTE PRESENTATIONS Initial Landscape Changes Associated with Marcellus Shale Development— Implications for Forests and Wildlife ....................................................................................................2 Margaret Brittingham, Patrick Drohan, and Joseph Bishop The Northern Forest Futures Project: Examining Past, Present, and Future Trends Affecting Forests in and around the Central Hardwood Forest Region .............................................3 Stephen Shifley BIOFUELS AND BIOENERGY Technical Challenges and Opportunities in Cogasification of Coal and Biomass ...........................5 Jagpinder Singh Brar, Kaushlendra Singh, and John Zondlo West Virginia Wood Waste from Uncharted Sources: Log Landings and Active Surface Mines ...14 Shawn T. Grushecky and Lawrence E. Osborn FOREST BIOMETRICS Growth and Yield for a 7-year-old Yellow-poplar Plantation in Northern West Virginia ................22 John R. Brooks Individual Tree, Merchantable Stem Green Weight and Volume Equations for Four Bottomland Hardwood Oak Species in Southeast Arkansas ...........................................................28 Paul F. Doruska, David W. Patterson, Matthew B. Hurd, and Jonathan I. Hartley ForestCrowns: A Software Tool for Analyzing Ground-based Digital Photographs of Forest Canopies....................................................................................................................................35 Matthew F. Winn, Sang-Mook Lee, and Philip A. Araman FOREST ECOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY Effect of Weed Control Treatments on Total Leaf Area of Plantation Black Walnut (Juglans Nigra) .....................................................................................................................................43
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Species List
    1 of 16 Claypits 20/09/2021 species list Group Taxon Common Name Earliest Latest Records acarine Aceria macrorhyncha 2012 2012 1 acarine Aceria nalepai 2018 2018 1 amphibian Bufo bufo Common Toad 2001 2018 6 amphibian Lissotriton helveticus Palmate Newt 2001 2018 5 amphibian Lissotriton vulgaris Smooth Newt 2001 2001 1 annelid Hirudinea Leech 2011 2011 1 bird Acanthis cabaret Lesser Redpoll 2013 2013 1 bird Acrocephalus schoenobaenus Sedge Warbler 2001 2011 2 bird Aegithalos caudatus Long-tailed Tit 2011 2014 2 bird Alcedo atthis Kingfisher 2020 2020 1 bird Anas platyrhynchos Mallard 2013 2018 4 bird Anser Goose 2011 2011 1 bird Ardea cinerea Grey Heron 2013 2013 1 bird Aythya fuligula Tufted Duck 2013 2014 1 bird Buteo buteo Buzzard 2013 2014 2 bird Carduelis carduelis Goldfinch 2011 2014 5 bird Chloris chloris Greenfinch 2011 2014 6 bird Chroicocephalus ridibundus Black-headed Gull 2014 2014 1 bird Coloeus monedula Jackdaw 2011 2013 2 bird Columba livia Feral Pigeon 2014 2014 1 bird Columba palumbus Woodpigeon 2011 2018 8 bird Corvus corax Raven 2020 2020 1 bird Corvus corone Carrion Crow 2011 2014 5 bird Curruca communis Whitethroat 2011 2014 4 bird Cyanistes caeruleus Blue Tit 2011 2014 6 bird Cygnus olor Mute Swan 2013 2014 4 bird Delichon urbicum House Martin 2011 2011 1 bird Emberiza schoeniclus Reed Bunting 2013 2014 2 bird Erithacus rubecula Robin 2011 2014 7 bird Falco peregrinus Peregrine 2013 2013 1 bird Falco tinnunculus Kestrel 2010 2020 3 bird Fringilla coelebs Chaffinch 2011 2014 7 bird Gallinula chloropus Moorhen 2013
    [Show full text]
  • Phytophthora Ramorum Sudden Oak Death Pathogen
    NAME OF SPECIES: Phytophthora ramorum Sudden Oak Death pathogen Synonyms: Common Name: Sudden Oak Death pathogen A. CURRENT STATUS AND DISTRIBUTION I. In Wisconsin? 1. YES NO X 2. Abundance: 3. Geographic Range: 4. Habitat Invaded: 5. Historical Status and Rate of Spread in Wisconsin: 6. Proportion of potential range occupied: II. Invasive in Similar Climate YES NO X Zones United States: In 14 coastal California Counties and in Curry County, Oregon. In nursery in Washington. Canada: Nursery in British Columbia. Europe: Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Poland, Spain, France, Belgium, and Sweden. III. Invasive in Similar Habitat YES X NO Types IV. Habitat Affected 1. Habitat affected: this disease thrives in cool, wet climates including areas in coastal California within the fog belt or in low- lying forested areas along stream beds and other bodies of water. Oaks associated with understory species that are susceptible to foliar infections are at higher risk of becoming infected. 2. Host plants: Forty-five hosts are regulated for this disease. These hosts have been found naturally infected by P. ramorum and have had Koch’s postulates completed, reviewed and accepted. Approximately fifty-nine species are associated with Phytophthora ramorum. These species are found naturally infected; P. ramorum has been cultured or detected with PCR but Koch’s postulates have not been completed or documented and reviewed. Northern red oak (Quercus rubra) is considered an associated host. See end of document for complete list of plant hosts. National Risk Model and Map shows susceptible forest types in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnosis of Phytophthora Ramorum in Trees
    Diagnosis of PhytophthoraPhytophthora ramorumramorum in Trees by Dr. Kim D. Coder, Warnell School of Forest Resources, University of Georgia April, 2004 The organism shown to be responsible for SOD (sudden oak death) is Phytophthora ramorum, a fungus / yeast-like brown algae. This pathogen generates a number of symptoms in the trees infected. Of the trees and large shrubs shown to be infectable with this pathogen, some species have more serious stem and branch lesions like oaks, while other species have primarily leaf and twig lesions. In a single landscape, multiple hosts can keep the pathogen present for further attacks. This publication was prepared by reviewing approximately 35 research or disease announcement publications in Europe and North America. In addition, a number of factsheets and synthesized informa- tion guides were reviewed for continuity. This publication is designed for field diagnosis of SOD-like symptoms and related symptom sets on community trees. This publication should not be used in tree nursery situations, and is not a pathogen centered review. It is critical to seek pathological expertise and testing for confirming disease organism presence. A selected bibliography is available entitled “Sudden Oak Death – SOD: Bibliography of Important Literature.” (Coder, Kim D. 2004. University of Georgia, Warnell School of Forest Resources outreach publication SFR04-1. 2pp.). Names The tree syndrome or symptom set which characterizes attack by Phytophthora ramorum has common names of “ramorum dieback,” “ramorum blight,” “ramorum twig blight,”“ramorum leaf blight,” “ramorum stem canker,” “blood spot disease,” or “sudden oak death” (SOD). Phytophthora ramorum, and the less virulent Phytophthora nemorosa and Phytophthora pseudosyringae are all relatively new pathogen species recovered from trees which show ramorum blight symptoms.
    [Show full text]
  • West Virginia Northern Flying Squirrel (WVNFS), Glauconzys Sabrinus Fuscus Five Year Status Review Appendix B — Capture Site Summaries
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service — West Virginia Field Office West Virginia northern flying squirrel (WVNFS), Glauconzys sabrinus fuscus Five Year Status Review Appendix B — Capture Site Summaries Attached are the summaries for the 105 West Virginia northern flying squirrel (WVNFS), G.s. fuscus, capture sites l in West Virginia. Although biologists occasionally use live-trapping, nest boxes have been the primary tool for population surveys for the WVNFS. Biologists place transects of nest boxes in a survey area and check the boxes periodically for occupancy, typically twice each year, in fall and spring. Northern flying squirrels are nocturnal, leaving their nests to forage at night and returning during the day, which facilitates daytime nest box monitoring. The success of nest box monitoring relies on the squirrels occupying the boxes during the day of the survey. Menzel (2003) found that no WVNFS in her radio telemetry study used nest boxes (despite their availability) as den sites. All nests were either natural tree cavities (i.e. dens) or dreys (i.e. outside nests constructed of leaves, twigs, lichens, etc.). She also noted WVNFS used multiple den sites, switching nests on average every 3 days in summer, and utilizing up to 12 den sites per month in lesser quality habitat (Menzel 2000, Menzel et al. 2004). Further, the nest box monitoring program conducted by the DNR had a 2% average success rate of squirrel occupancy per box checked. These data confirm the difficulty of capturing squirrels via nest boxes and caution against relying on nest box survey results to determine occupied habitat, i.e., although a captured individual affirms presence, an empty nest box does not necessarily signify absence or unoccupied habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
    Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Forest Genetic Resources Working Papers State of Forest and Tree Genetic Resources in the Republic of Moldova by Dragos Postolache Botanical Garden (Institute) Academy of Sciences Chisinau, Republic of Moldova 2004 Forest Resources Development Service Working Paper FGR/64E Forest Resources Division FAO, Rome, Italy Disclaimer The Forest Genetic Resources Working Papers report on issues and activities related to the conservation, sustainable use and management of forest genetic resources. The purpose of these papers is to provide early information on on-going activities and programmes, and to stimulate discussion. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Quantitative information regarding the status of forest resources has been compiled according to sources, methodologies and protocols identified and selected by the author, for assessing the diversity and status of genetic resources. For standardized methodologies and assessments on forest resources, please refer to FAO, 2003. State of the World’s Forests 2003 ; and to FAO, 2001. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000 (FRA2000). FAO Forestry Paper No 140 . Information can also be found at the FAO-Forestry Internet site (http://www.fao.org/forestry/Forestry.asp ). Comments and feedback are welcome. For further information please contact: Pierre Sigaud, Forestry Officer (Forest Genetic Resources) Forest Resources Division Forestry Department FAO, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla 00100 Rome, Italy Fax: +39 06 570 55 137 [email protected] For quotation: Postolache, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Download 2013 Accomplishments
    Prepared by CASRI – www.restoreredspruce.org TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 2013 Highlighted Projects .............................................................................................................................................. 4 Volunteers Lead the Way in Red Spruce Restoration at Canaan Valley NWR ...................................... 4 Maintaining Momentum on the Mower Tract: Moving from Barton Bench to Lambert .................. 5 Thunderstruck: A Major Conservation Win for TNC and CASRI ................................................................ 7 Researchers in the Trees: Getting Spruced Up .................................................................................................. 8 CASRI Accomplishments, 2013 ................................................................................................................................... 10 GOAL 1. MAINTAIN AND INCREASE OVERALL AREA OF ECOLOGICALLY FUNCTIONING RED SPRUCE COMMUNITIES WITHIN THEIR HISTORIC RANGE. ..................................................................... 10 GOAL II. INCREASE THE BIOLOGICAL INTEGRITY OF EXISTING RED SPRUCE NORTHERN- HARDWOOD COMMUNITIES................................................................................................................................... 15 GOAL III. PROTECT HABITAT FOR KEY WILDLIFE SPECIES AND COMMUNITIES
    [Show full text]
  • Monongahela National Forest
    Monongahela National Forest Administrative Correction 15 August 12, 2010 Changes to Management Prescription 8.2 Areas Due to New Information Under the 2000 Planning Rule (36 CFR 219.31), the following administrative corrections and additions may be made at any time, are not plan amendments or revisions, and do not require public notice or the preparation of an environmental document under Forest Service NEPA procedures: (1) Corrections and updates of data and maps; (2) Updates to activity lists and schedules as required by § 219.30(d)(1)-(6); (3) Corrections of typographical errors or other non-substantive changes; and (4) Changes in monitoring methods other than those required in a monitoring strategy. The following corrections are a result of new information from the USDI National Park Service about National Natural Landmarks (NNLs) on the Monongahela National Forest (MNF). During a recent visit to inspect NNLs on the MNF, Carolyn Davis of the NPS compared her list of NNLs on the Forest to the Forest Ecologist’s list, and two discrepancies were found. First, the Falls of Hills Creek area was not on the NPS list as an NNL. Second, the Germany Valley Karst Area was on the NPS list but not on the MNF list of NNLs. Therefore, the following administrative corrections are being made to NNLs, which are identified as Management Prescription 8.2 in the MNF Forest Plan. All acreage figures have been rounded off to the nearest 10 acres. CORRECTIONS Forest Plan Chapter III, page III-40 (originally page III-46) MP 8.0 Special Area Table, seventh
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Classification of Acidophilous Oak Forestsin Slovakia
    Tuexenia 40: 33–52. Göttingen 2020. doi: 10.14471/2020.40.010, available online at www.zobodat.at Vegetation classification of acidophilous oak forests in Slovakia Vegetationsklassifikation bodensaurer Eichenwälder in der Slowakei Michal Slezák1, 2, * , Milan Valachovič3, , Drahoš Blanár4, František Máliš5, 6 , Dušan Senko3 & Hubert Žarnovičan7 1Institute of Forest Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Ľ. Štúra 2, 950 53 Zvolen, Slovakia; 2Podtatranské museum in Poprad, Vajanského 72/4, 058 01 Poprad, Slovakia; 3Institute of Botany, Plant Science and Biodiversity Center, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 23 Bratislava, Slovakia; 4Administration of the Muránska planina National Park, J, Kráľa 12, 050 01 Revúca, Slovakia; 5Department of Phytology, Faculty of Forestry, Technical University in Zvolen, T. G. Masaryka 24, 960 01 Zvolen, Slovakia; 6National Forest Centre, Forest Research Institute Zvolen, T. G. Masaryka 22, 960 01 Zvolen, Slovakia; 7Department of Landscape Ecology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Mlynská dolina, Ilkovičova 6, 842 15 Bratislava, Slovakia *Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract Acidophilous oak forests are species-poor forest plant communities usually growing on mineral- poor geological and soil substrates. We compiled a large data set of 263 phytosociological relevés assigned to the Quercion roboris alliance in Slovakia to produce the first syntaxonomical revision at national level. Modified Twinspan algorithm was applied for numerical classification and
    [Show full text]
  • Quercus Robur and Quercus Petraea
    Quercus robur and Quercus petraea Quercus robur and Quercus petraea in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats E. Eaton, G. Caudullo, S. Oliveira, D. de Rigo these oaks can mix, compete and naturally hybridise with other Mediterranean oaks, such as Quercus pubescens and Quercus Quercus robur L., (pedunculate oak) and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl., (sessile oak) are common broadleaved tree frainetto, even if at relatively low rates12. Both oaks occur at species in Europe, found from Scandinavia to the Iberian Peninsula. The two species are quite similar in appearance and higher elevations in southern regions: Q. robur is recorded to grow have a broadly overlapping range. Oak trees have cultural significance for people throughout Europe and the trees or up to 1 300 m in the Alps13, while Q. petraea is more montane leaves are frequently used in national or regional symbols. Oak trees can live for more than 1 000 years and grow to and in southern Turkey can reach over 2 000 m4, 14, 15. Due to the be 30 to 40 m in height. The wood from oaks is hard and durable and has been valued for centuries. It is favoured for substantial human interest and usage of the species over many construction and for wine and spirit barrels; historically it was a major source of ship timbers. Recently, concerns have centuries, there is widespread disturbance in their distribution, and arisen about the fate of oaks in the face of Acute Oak Decline, a little understood syndrome. the structure of their original forests is highly uncertain16. Q.
    [Show full text]
  • Newcastle West Biodiversity Survey 2020
    Newcastle West Biodiversity Survey 2020 By Geoff Hunt This survey was carried out on behalf of Newcastle West Tidy Towns 1 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Survey Area .................................................................................................................................. 8 1.2 Castle Demesne ............................................................................................................................ 9 1.3 Habitat abbreviations................................................................................................................. 11 1.4 General abbreviations ................................................................................................................ 11 2 Species Results .................................................................................................................................. 12 2.1 Birds ........................................................................................................................................... 12 2.2 Butterflies ................................................................................................................................... 15 2.3 Moths ......................................................................................................................................... 16 2.4 Dragonflies and Damselflies ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Outdoor Recreation Resource Amenity Indices for West Virginia
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2008 Development of outdoor recreation resource amenity indices for West Virginia Jing Wang West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Wang, Jing, "Development of outdoor recreation resource amenity indices for West Virginia" (2008). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 2680. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/2680 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Development of Outdoor Recreation Resource Amenity Indices for West Virginia Jing Wang Thesis submitted to the Davis College of Agriculture, Forestry, and Consumer Sciences At West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Recreation, Parks, and Tourism Resources Jinyang Deng, Ph.D., Chair Chad
    [Show full text]
  • An Updated Infrageneric Classification of the North American Oaks
    Article An Updated Infrageneric Classification of the North American Oaks (Quercus Subgenus Quercus): Review of the Contribution of Phylogenomic Data to Biogeography and Species Diversity Paul S. Manos 1,* and Andrew L. Hipp 2 1 Department of Biology, Duke University, 330 Bio Sci Bldg, Durham, NC 27708, USA 2 The Morton Arboretum, Center for Tree Science, 4100 Illinois 53, Lisle, IL 60532, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The oak flora of North America north of Mexico is both phylogenetically diverse and species-rich, including 92 species placed in five sections of subgenus Quercus, the oak clade centered on the Americas. Despite phylogenetic and taxonomic progress on the genus over the past 45 years, classification of species at the subsectional level remains unchanged since the early treatments by WL Trelease, AA Camus, and CH Muller. In recent work, we used a RAD-seq based phylogeny including 250 species sampled from throughout the Americas and Eurasia to reconstruct the timing and biogeography of the North American oak radiation. This work demonstrates that the North American oak flora comprises mostly regional species radiations with limited phylogenetic affinities to Mexican clades, and two sister group connections to Eurasia. Using this framework, we describe the regional patterns of oak diversity within North America and formally classify 62 species into nine major North American subsections within sections Lobatae (the red oaks) and Quercus (the Citation: Manos, P.S.; Hipp, A.L. An Quercus Updated Infrageneric Classification white oaks), the two largest sections of subgenus . We also distill emerging evolutionary and of the North American Oaks (Quercus biogeographic patterns based on the impact of phylogenomic data on the systematics of multiple Subgenus Quercus): Review of the species complexes and instances of hybridization.
    [Show full text]