How America Can Help Baltic Independence

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

How America Can Help Baltic Independence 762 March 29,1990 HOW AMERICA CAN HELP BALTIC INDEPENDENCE The Baltic peoples’ struggle for independence is entering its decisive ~ phase. For now, the spotlight is on Lithuania, where Mikhail Gorbachev’s 1 show of force is an attempt to frighten into submission that country’s democratically elected government. In the wings, ready to move to stage cen- ter, are the independence movements of Estonia and Latvia. The crisis in Lithuania is forcing Washington to make some hard decisions about the Baltic states. For a half-century, of course, the United States has supported the restoration of their independence.This support was largely rhetorical and cost little; it had virtually no effect. Now, the U.S. can make good on its decades of promises and declarations.This the U.S. must do - in a firm and direct, but measured way. At this critical moment in the history of the Baltic republics, George Bush should extend official recognition to the new democratic government in Lithuania and tell Gorbachev that Moscow will pay a heavy price if it uses force against Lithuania and the other two Baltic states. Illegally Annexed. The case for America supporting Baltic independence is overwhelming: America never has accepted Moscow’s rule over the Baltic states. Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania were independent and sovereign states after their independence was recognized by the Soviet Union in 1920 and by the international community. But as the result of a secret treaty between Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin in August 1939 -the infamous “Hitler-Stalin Pact” - the Baltic states were occupied and annexed by Moscow in 1940.This. annexation was not recognized by the U.S.,and the Hitler-Stalin Pact at last was declared illegal by the Soviet Parliament on December 28,1989. American policies to help the Baltic republics must not be an ad hoc response to the dramatic, exhilarating, and frightening events there. Instead, the policies must rest on a foundation of sound principles applying beyond Es- tonia, Latvia, and Lithuania to all the Soviet nationalities and their desires for independence and self-determination.These are: Principle #1: The U.S. supports Baltic independence. Principle #2: The U.S. very strongly favors the peaceful achievement of in- dependence. Principle #3: The U.S. will impose an appropriate penalty on Moscow if it prevents, by intimidation or force, peaceful independence of the Baltic republics. Principle #4: The U.S. will understand sympathetically if the Baltic states must use force to counter Moscow’s intimidation and force, but the U.S.will not be able to provide help for such Baltic use of force other than American verbal expressions of solidarity and sympathy. Principle #5: The U.S.will reward Moscow appropriately for allowing the Baltic republics to become independent peacefully and similarly will reward Moscow for allowing other Soviet nationalities to achieve independence or self-determination peacefully. Principle #6: The U.S. seeks no unilateral gain in the matter of Baltic inde- pendence nor does it seek to exploit the matter to harm the Soviet Union. Translating these principles into policy, the Bush Administration should: + + Warn Moscow not to use force against the Baltic states, making clear that a crackdown will seriously impair U.S.-Soviet relations. Gorbachev hopes to revive the Soviet economy with help from _theWest. Moscow must realize that using force against the Baltics will torpedo such help. + + Grant official recognition to the new democratic Baltic governments once they establish their sovereignty and request U.S. recognition. The U.S. should appoint ambassadors to each republic and upgrade the existing Baltic diplomatic missions in the U.S.from legations to full-fledged embassies. + + Ask Congress to exchange parliamentary groups with each Baltic republic. These exchanges could be part of a series of linkages between Con- gress and the Baltics’ new parliaments, which would demonstrate American support for the new democracies, help end their psychological isolation from the West, and assist their reestablishment of effective legislative powers. Con- gress should also invite Lithuania’s President Vyautas Landsbergis to address a joint session. + Include these countries in U.S. foreign aid packages to Eastern Europe. The Baltic states are part of Eastern Europe, and the U.S. should treat them as such. Even small amounts of U.S. assistance would help them enormously. + + Make Soviet military occupation of the Baltic states a conventional arms control issue. The U.S. and its NATO allies must make clear to Mos- cow that an agreement on conventional force reductions will not confer any right on the Soviet Union to station its forces in the Baltic states and also 2 declare that any future negotiations will address the issue of the Soviet military occupation of these countries. + + Encourage international organizations; such as the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), and such European organizations as the Council of Europe, to admit the Baltic states as full members. The Baltic states are recognized as sovereign countries by much of the international community and deserve to be members of the United Nations just as they were of the League of Nations.The IMF and its sister organization the World Bank pro- vide credits to member governments. The GAlT is a broad-based grouping of countries dedicated to removing trade barriers. Membership in each will assist the Baltic states in quickly joining the international economy. + + Insist that this fall’s session of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE) discuss Baltic independence; The forthcom- ing CSCE meeting is being held at Soviet request to review the broad range of political and security issues in Europe. It is the best forum at which to dis- cuss the issue of Baltic independence as it will be attended by every European country except Albania, as well as the U.S. and Canada. The Baltic states should participate in this meeting on an equal basis with the other European states. + + Press America’s Western allies to take similar actions to support the Baltic states. The Baltic independence movements offer the U.S. the opportunity to as- sist the orderly dissolution of the Soviet colonial empire. With their emphasis on a peaceful and negotiated path to independence, the Baltic states offer Moscow a chance to address its imperial crisis before it explodes. Their suc- cess could be a model for resolving peacefully other phases of what could be the enormously dangerous problem of Soviet decolonization. U.S. support for this process would strengthen those Soviet leaders who understand that Moscow’s use of force to suppress the nationalist movements almost surely would lead to disaster and prolonged conflict. Conversely, U.S.and Western inaction regarding the Baltic republics’ strivings for independence would make it easier for those in the Kremlin who would use force to suppress all of the nationalities. THE ORIGINS OF INDEPENDENCE Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania have long and illustrious histories. Although Lithuania was a major power in Eastern Europe in the 16th and 17th cen- turies, ruling over territories stretching from present-day Poland to Ukraine, each Baltic state has suffered repeated conquests. They became part of the ~ 1 Although common American usage places “the” before Ukraine, Ukrainians assert that this derives from Moscow‘s claim that Ukraine is a region of Russia, not a nation unto itself. 3 Russian Empire when Peter the Great took them from Sweden in the Great Northern War in 1718. They and the other peoples conquered by Moscow remained a part of that Empire until the disintegration of central authority in the Russian Revolutions of 1917. Independence Recognized. During the Russian Civil War, which broke out in early 1918, several of the subject peoples of the Empire -the Baltic states, Finland, Georgia, Poland, Ukraine, and other areas in Muslim Central Asia - seized their opportunity to escape and declared their independence from Russia. By 1921, however, Ukraine and Central Asia and most other states had been reconquered by the Red Army. Poland and the Baltic republics were not. Moscow eventually renounced all claims to Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania and recognized their full independence in treaties signed on February 2, August 11, and July 12,1920, respectively. The U.S. recognized all three on July 28,1922. After independence, these countries managed an uneasy coexistence with their giant neighbor. On August 23,1939, however, Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union signed the Hitler-Stalin Pact, which divided Eastern Europe be- tween them. The Pact’s secret protocols allotted Estonia and Latvia to Mos- cow; Lithuania went to Germany.The Pact was modified in 1940 to give Lithuania to the Soviet Union in exchange for some of Moscow’s share of recently conquered Poland. The Soviet Union moved quickly to take control of the Baltic states.Treaties allowing Soviet forces to be stationed on their soil were forced on Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania on September 28, October 5, and October 10,1939, respectively.These were soon followed by outright Soviet military occupation and an overthrow of the independent govern- ments. Rigged elections were held producing communist-dominated parlia- ments, which on July 21,1940, voted to request annexation to the Soviet Union.The Stalinist terror then descended with full force in the summer of 1940, and tens of thousands of people were imprisoned, executed, or sent to the Gulag in Siberia. Washington responded by extending to the Baltic states its policy of refus- ing to recognize the forcible seizure of territory by the fascist powers.This was the origin of the “non-recognition policy” by-which the U.S. continues to treat the Baltic states as independent and does not officially recognize their incorporation into the Soviet Union.
Recommended publications
  • Download Download
    Ajalooline Ajakiri, 2016, 3/4 (157/158), 477–511 Historical consciousness, personal life experiences and the orientation of Estonian foreign policy toward the West, 1988–1991 Kaarel Piirimäe and Pertti Grönholm ABSTRACT The years 1988 to 1991 were a critical juncture in the history of Estonia. Crucial steps were taken during this time to assure that Estonian foreign policy would not be directed toward the East but primarily toward the integration with the West. In times of uncertainty and institutional flux, strong individuals with ideational power matter the most. This article examines the influence of For- eign Minister Lennart Meri’s and Prime Minister Edgar Savisaar’s experienc- es and historical consciousness on their visions of Estonia’s future position in international affairs. Life stories help understand differences in their horizons of expectation, and their choices in conducting Estonian diplomacy. Keywords: historical imagination, critical junctures, foreign policy analysis, So- viet Union, Baltic states, Lennart Meri Much has been written about the Baltic states’ success in breaking away from Eastern Europe after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, and their decisive “return to the West”1 via radical economic, social and politi- Research for this article was supported by the “Reimagining Futures in the European North at the End of the Cold War” project which was financed by the Academy of Finland. Funding was also obtained from the “Estonia, the Baltic states and the Collapse of the Soviet Union: New Perspectives on the End of the Cold War” project, financed by the Estonian Research Council, and the “Myths, Cultural Tools and Functions – Historical Narratives in Constructing and Consolidating National Identity in 20th and 21st Century Estonia” project, which was financed by the Turku Institute for Advanced Studies (TIAS, University of Turku).
    [Show full text]
  • Estonian Academy of Sciences Yearbook 2018 XXIV
    Facta non solum verba ESTONIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES YEARBOOK FACTS AND FIGURES ANNALES ACADEMIAE SCIENTIARUM ESTONICAE XXIV (51) 2018 TALLINN 2019 This book was compiled by: Jaak Järv (editor-in-chief) Editorial team: Siiri Jakobson, Ebe Pilt, Marika Pärn, Tiina Rahkama, Ülle Raud, Ülle Sirk Translator: Kaija Viitpoom Layout: Erje Hakman Photos: Annika Haas p. 30, 31, 48, Reti Kokk p. 12, 41, 42, 45, 46, 47, 49, 52, 53, Janis Salins p. 33. The rest of the photos are from the archive of the Academy. Thanks to all authos for their contributions: Jaak Aaviksoo, Agnes Aljas, Madis Arukask, Villem Aruoja, Toomas Asser, Jüri Engelbrecht, Arvi Hamburg, Sirje Helme, Marin Jänes, Jelena Kallas, Marko Kass, Meelis Kitsing, Mati Koppel, Kerri Kotta, Urmas Kõljalg, Jakob Kübarsepp, Maris Laan, Marju Luts-Sootak, Märt Läänemets, Olga Mazina, Killu Mei, Andres Metspalu, Leo Mõtus, Peeter Müürsepp, Ülo Niine, Jüri Plado, Katre Pärn, Anu Reinart, Kaido Reivelt, Andrus Ristkok, Ave Soeorg, Tarmo Soomere, Külliki Steinberg, Evelin Tamm, Urmas Tartes, Jaana Tõnisson, Marja Unt, Tiit Vaasma, Rein Vaikmäe, Urmas Varblane, Eero Vasar Printed in Priting House Paar ISSN 1406-1503 (printed version) © EESTI TEADUSTE AKADEEMIA ISSN 2674-2446 (web version) CONTENTS FOREWORD ...........................................................................................................................................5 CHRONICLE 2018 ..................................................................................................................................7 MEMBERSHIP
    [Show full text]
  • Speech by President Lennart Meri
    Freedom Through Democracy, Security, and Unity in Diversity Memorable Words of Lennart Meri, President of the Republic of Estonia, From His Speeches 1992–2001 Lennart Meri Compiled and edited by M. Merrick Yamamoto Visual Tutor Company, 2016 From the President’s New Year’s Eve Message, December 31, 1999 Dear fellow countrymen! Today, we are all one big family. Today, in my mind, I shake hands with all of you, look everybody in the eye, and ask: how are you? Today’s New Year is so different from all that have been and all those still to come. It is mysterious, at least in our imagination. Round numbers have a powerful influence on our mind and on our behaviour, especially when the New Year is also connected to the beginning of a new century, a new millennium. A friend of mine even asked me for an interview concerning the third millennium. I asked him: What could a tiller or a fisherman from Rävala or Saaremaa have said about the second millennium in the year 999? On the New Year, there will be no change in the constellation of stars, in the movement of the Sun or the Earth. For an ancient Estonian, the flow of time was constant and indivisible, like the peaceful flow of a river. We toast the new millennium, fill the sky with fireworks and celebrate today, because we are part of the Christian culture. The year 2000 is a year of advent, the year of transition, taking us to the third millennium after the birth of Christ.
    [Show full text]
  • As of January 2012 Estonian Archives in the US--Book Collection3.Xlsx
    Indexed by Title Estonian Archives in the US Book Collection Author Title Date Dewey # Collect Saar, J1. detsember 1924 Tallinnas 1925 901 Saa Eesti Vangistatud Vaba‐ dusvõitlejate 1. Kogud VII, 2. Kogud VIII‐XIII, 3. Kogud XIV‐XIX, 4. nd 323 Ees Abistamis‐ keskus Kogud XX‐XXV 1985‐1987 Simre, M1. praktiline inglise keele grammatika >1945 422 Sim DP Sepp, Hans 1. ülemaailmne eesti arstide päev 1972 610 Sep EKNÜRO Aktsioonikomitee 1.Tõsiolud jutustavad, nr. 1, 2. nr.2, 3. nr.3 1993 323 EKN Eesti Inseneride Liit 10 aastat eesti inseneride liitu: 1988‐1999 nd 620 Ees Reed, John 10 päeva mis vaputasid maailma 1958 923.1 Re Baltimore Eesti Selts 10. Kandlepäevad 1991 787.9 Ba Koik, Lembit 100 aastat eesti raskejõustikku (1888‐1988) 1966 791 Koi Eesti Lauljate Liit 100 aastat eesti üldlaulupidusid 1969 782 Ees Wise, W H 100 best true stories of World War II, The 1945 905 Wis Pajo, Maido 100 küsimust ja vastust maaõigusest 1999 305 Paj Pärna, Ants 100 laeva 1975 336.1 Pä Plank, U 100 Vaimulikku laulu 1945 242 Pla DP Sinimets, I 1000 fakti Nõukogude Eestist 1981 911.1 Si Eesti Lauljate Liit Põhja‐ Ameerikas 110.a. juubeli laulupeo laulud 1979 780 Ees 12 märtsi radadel 1935 053 Kak Tihase, K12 motiivi eesti taluehitistest 1974 721.1 Ti Kunst 12 reproduktsiooni eesti graafikast 1972 741.1 K Laarman, Märt 12 reproduktsiooni eesti graafikast 1973 741.1 La 12. märts 1934 1984 053 Kak 12. märts. Aasta riiklikku ülesehitustööd; 12. märts 1934 ‐ 12, 1935 053 Kak märts. 1935 Eesti Lauljate Liit Põhja‐ Ameerikas 120.a.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs
    The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project MILDRED A. PATTERSON Interviewed by: Charles Stuart Kennedy Initial interview date: May 6, 2003 Copyright 2004 ADST TABLE OF CONTENTS Background Born and raised in ansas City, Missouri University of Pennsylvania Entered Foreign Service - 1976 Copenhagen, Denmark - Rotation Officer 1976-197, Environment -ermany State Department - Operations Center 1979-19,. Iran hostage crisis Tripoli em0assy Crisis handling State Department - Staff Secretariat - 1ine Officer 19,.-19,1 Transition 2administration3 State Department - EUR - Hungary and Baltic States 4 Desk Officer 19,1-19,3 Baltic diplomats Ethnic communities Hungary politics Orientation trip 2Hungary3 Soviet ties Relations Brussels, Belgium - Consular Officer 2Tandem Assignment3 19,3-19,6 6isas and passports State Department - Personnel - Assignments Officer 19,6-19,, European Bureau Assignment process 1 8ational 9ar College 19,,-19,9 Usefulness Ankara, Turkey - -eneral Services Officer 2Tandem Assignment3 19,9-1992 Armenia Relations Pollution Ira: 2possi0le hostages3 President Bush;s visit urdish refugees State Department - Consular Bureau - Emergency Center 1992-1993 U.S. citizens a0road Prisoner exchange Destitute Americans State Department - I8R - Armenia and -eorgia Analyst 1993-1994 Armenia -eorgian civil war Russians State Department - FSI - Turkish 1anguage Training 1994-199A Ankara, Turkey - 9ife of Am0assador 21eave 9ithout Pay3 199A-1997 Environment Military wives Relations -reece urds Headscarves issue Status of women State Department - Consular Affairs - 6isa Office - Director 1997-2... Immigration and Naturalization Service BI8SC Servicing China Congress Personnel State Department - Consular Affairs - Deputy Executive Director 2...-2..2 Mary Ryan Congressional relations CIA 2 Retirement 8ovem0er 3., 2..2 INTERVIEW Q: Today is May 6th, 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr
    ~ 2 UNITED' .,NATIONS A General Assembly Distr. GENERAL 'A/47/317 9 July 1992 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH • ,I" ' Forty-seventh session Items 37 and 80 of the preliminary list* STRENGTHENING OF THE COORDINATION OF HUMANITARIAN EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE OF THE UNITED NATIONS REPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT Letter dated 8 July 1992 from the Permanent Representatives of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General We have the honour. on behalf of the Governments of Estonia. Latvia and Lithuania, to transmit to you the text of an address by the Heads of State of the Baltic countries to the Heads of State and Governments of the Baltic Sea States, to the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe and to the United Nations. This document was signed on the occasion of the meeting of the three Baltic leaders in Tallinn, Estonia, on 26 June 1992 (see annex). 1, 1 * A/47/50. 120792 92-30051 3547b (E) 100792 / ... 1 Digitized by Dag Hammarskjöld Library t A/47/317 English Page 2 We would appreciate it if the text of the present letter and its annex would be circulated as an official document of the General Assembly under items 37 and 80 of the preliminary list. (Signed) Ernst JAAKSON Ambassador Permanent Representative of the Republic of Estonia to the United Nations b, (Signed) Aivars BAUMANIS Ambassador il Permanent Representative of the be Republic of Latvia to the pc United Nations a: aJ (Signed) Anicetas SIMUTIS Tl Ambassador UJ Permanent Representative of the Republic of Lithuania to the United Nations tt al: st ri Co pr Ul'l po we co St Ar Ch Ta: / ..
    [Show full text]
  • The Annexation of the Baltic States and Its Effect on the Development of Law Prohibiting Forcible Seizure of Territory William J.H
    NYLS Journal of International and Comparative Law Volume 6 Article 5 Number 2 Volume 6, No. 2, 1985 1985 The Annexation of the Baltic States and Its Effect on the Development of Law Prohibiting Forcible Seizure of Territory William J.H. Hough III Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/ journal_of_international_and_comparative_law Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Hough, William J.H. III (1985) "The Annexation of the Baltic States and Its Effect on the Development of Law Prohibiting Forcible Seizure of Territory," NYLS Journal of International and Comparative Law: Vol. 6 : No. 2 , Article 5. Available at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/journal_of_international_and_comparative_law/vol6/iss2/5 This Notes and Comments is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in NYLS Journal of International and Comparative Law by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@NYLS. THE ANNEXATION OF THE BALTIC STATES AND ITS EFFECT ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF LAW PROHIBITING FORCIBLE SEIZURE OF TERRITORY TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ....................................... 303 II. HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF LAW PROHIBITING FORCIBLE SEIZURE OF TERRITORY ................................ 305 A. European Origins ............................... 305 B. Legal Development After the Peace of Westphalia 308 C. Title to Territory in the Colonial Era ............ 319 D. Post World War I Development .................. 321 E. Birth of the Stimson Doctrine of Nonrecognition of Forcible Seizure of Territory ..................... 326 III. THE ANNEXATION OF THE BALTIC STATES ................. 351 A. Origins of the Baltic States ...................... 351 B. Independence of the Baltic States ................ 355 C. Soviet Invasion and Incorporation of the Baltic S ta tes .......................................... 369 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Scanned Image
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DSpace at Tartu University Library EESTI MAAILMAS 21. SAJANDI KÜNNISEL EESTI MAAILMAS 21. SAJANDI KÜNNISEL TARTU ÜLIKOOL EESTI MAAILMAS 21. SAJANDI KÜNNISEL Eesti Vabariigi presidendi Lennart Meri 70. sünnipäevale pühendatud konverentsi kogumik Tartus, 27. märtsil 1999 TARTU 1999 Keeletoimetajad: Leelo J ago (eesti keel) Meelis Leesik (inglise keel) © Tartu Ülikool, 1999 ISBN 9985-4-0108-5 Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus Tiigi 78, Tartu 50410 Tellimus nr. 569 SISUKORD Eesti Vabariigi presidendi Lennart Meri elulugu ....... 7 Paul A. Goble. The managed indiscretions of Lennart Meri .......................................................... 13 Toomas Hendrik Ilves. Eesti 21. sajandi lävel ........... 23 Wolfgang Drechsler. The Estonian State at the threshold of the 21st century.................................. 27 Rektor professor Jaak Aaviksoo kõne konverentsil “Eesti maailmas 21. sajandi künnisel” ................... 47 2 5 EESTI VABARIIGI PRESIDENDI LENNART MERI ELULUGU Lennart Meri on sündinud 29. märtsil 1929 Tallinnas Eesti diplomaadi ja hilisema Shakespeare’i tõlkija Georg Meri perekonnas. Koos perekonnaga lahkus ta varakult Eestist ning on pidanud üheksa korda kooli ning neli korda keelt vahetama. Kõige soojemalt meenutab ta oma õpinguid Lycee Janson de Saillys Pariisis. Eesti okupeerimine Nõukogude Liidu poolt tabas perekonda Tallinnas. Aastal 1941 küüditati perekond koos kümnete tuhandete saatusekaaslastega Eestist, Lä­ tist ja Leedust Siberisse. Perekonnapead lahutati pere­ kondadest ja suleti kontsentratsioonilaagritesse, kus vähe­ sed ellu jäid. Kaheteistaastaselt alustas Lennart Meri oma karjääri metsatöölisena. Ta on olnud ka kartulikoorija ja metsaparvetaja. Meride perekond jäi ellu ja jõudis tagasi Eestisse, kus Lennart Meri lõpetas 1953. aastal Tartu Ülikooli ajaloo eriala cum laude. Nõukogude administratsioon ei lubanud tal ajaloolasena töötada.
    [Show full text]
  • July 29, 1983 UNITED STATES MISSION to the UNITED
    July 29, 1983 UNITED STATES MISSION TO THE UNITED NATIONS THE UNITED STATES REAFFIRMS RECOGNITION OF INDEPENDENCE OF ESTONIA, LATVIA AND LITHUANIA Ambassador Jeane J. Kirkpatrick, United States Permanent Representative to the United Nations has delivered to the Secretary-General of the United Nations, mr. Javier Pérez de Cuéllar, the next statement issued by President Reagan on the occasion of the anniversary of the recognition, by the United States, of the three independent Baltic republics of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. She requested that this statement be made an official document of United Nations General Assembly and circulated. The 38th General Assembly will consider the importance of the right of peoples to self-determination and of the speedy granting of independence. The following is the text of President Reagan's statement: On July 26, 1983, we mark the sixty-first anniversary of the de jure recognition of the three Baltic Republics of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia by the United States. Each of these states was a full member of the League of Nations and had signed non-aggression treaties with the Soviet Union. Yet all three countries were forcibly incorporated into the Soviet Union more than forty years ago as a result of the infamous Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact which divided Eastern Europe into Nazi and Soviet spheres of influence. By continuing the illegal occupation of the Baltic States under the provisions of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, the Soviet Union violates international law, particularly the right to self-determination as set forth in the United Nations Carter and in subsequent resolutions of the General Assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • Latvia and the United States: a New Chapter in the Partnership
    LATVIA AND THE UNITED STATES: A NEW CHAPTER IN THE PARTNERSHIP Editor Ivars Indāns Centre for East European Policy Studies Riga, 2012 The project was implemented with the support of the American Latvian Associ- ation, Rietumu Charity Fund, Free Port of Riga, and the Latvian Embassy to the U.S. Authors of papers in the book: Ivars Indāns, Ainārs Lerhis, Paul Goble, Da- mon Wilson, Andris Sprūds, Airis Rikveilis, Andis Kudors, Reinis Āboltiņš, Laila Kundziņa-Zvejniece, Signe Bāliņa, Andris Melnūdris Editor – Ivars Indāns Assistant to the editor – Ainārs Lerhis Project coordinator – Andis Kudors English editor – Kārlis Streips Design of the cover – Toms Deģis © Authors of the book, 2012 © Centre for East European Policy Studies, 2012 ISBN: 978-9934-8292-0-8 TABLE OF CONTENts INTRODUCTION Ivars Indāns . 7 Latvian Perspectives in Washington D.C. Introduction by Andrejs Pildegovičs, Ambassador of Latvia to the U.S. 11 American Perspectives in Latvia Introduction by Judith G. Garber, Ambassador of the USA to Latvia 14 1. HISTORICAL OVERVIEW OF RELATIONS. 19 The Development of Latvian – U.S. Relations, 1918–1991: Continuous Diplomatic Relations and Support for Latvia's State Continuity Ainārs Lerhis 19 Baltic Independence in 2011: is Twenty Years a Little or a Lot? Paul Goble 34 2. CONTEMPORARY RELATIONS. 41 The Vision of Latvia in the Context of Baltic-Nordic Security Damon Wilson 41 U.S. Policy Toward Central and East Europe Under the Obama Administration Andris Sprūds 45 American Views on U.S. - Latvian Relations and the Role of the Reset Policy with Russia Heather A.Conley, A. Wess Mitchell, Damon Wilson, Joelle Attinger, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Hearing the Baltic Question 1989.Pdf
    IMPLEMENTATION OF THE HELSINKI ACCORDS HEARING BEFORE THE COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE ONE HUNDREDTH FIRST CONGRESS FIRST SESSION THE BALTIC QUESTION OCTOBER 19, 1989 Printed for the use of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe [CSCE 101-1-9] U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 26-374 WASHINGTON: 1990 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Office U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE DENNIS DECONCINI, Arizona, Chairman STENY H. HOYER, Maryland, Cochairman DANTE B. FASCELL, Florida FRANK LAUTENBERG, New Jersey EDWARD J. MARKEY, Massachusetts TIMOTHY WIRTH, Colorado BILL RICHARDSON, New Mexico WYCHE FOWLER, Georgia EDWARD FEIGHAN, Ohio HARRY REID, Nevada DON RITTER, Pennsylvania ALFONSE M. D'AMATO, New York CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey JOHN HEINZ, Pennsylvania JOHN EDWARD PORTER, Illinois JAMES McCLURE, Idaho FRANK R. WOLF, Virginia MALCOLM WALLOP, Wyoming EXECUTIVE BRANCH HON. RICHARD SCHIFTER, Department of State STEPHEN J. HADLEY, Department of Defense WILLIAM D. FRITTS, JR., Department of Commerce SAMUEL G. WISE, Staff Director MARY SUE HAFNER, Deputy Staff Director and General Counsel JANE S. FISHER, Deputy Staff Director MIKE AMITAY, Staff Assistant ANN W. BANCHOFF, Staff Assistant CATHERINE COSMAN, Staff Assistant DANA L. CROSBY, Receptionist OREST DEYCHAKIWSKY, Staff Assistant JOHN FINERTY, Staff Assistant ROBERT HAND, Staff Assistant GINA M. HARNER, Administrative Assistant JUDITH INGRAM, Staff Assistant JESSE JACOBS, Staff Assistant RONALD MCNAMARA, Staff Assistant MICHAEL OCHS, Staff Assistant SPENCER OLIVER, Consultant MARK RAMEE, Senior Advisor for Soviet & East European Affairs BETH RITCHIE, Press Officer ERIKA SCHLAGER, Staff Assistant TOM WARNER, Printing Clerk (11) CONTENTS Page Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Estonia on the Road Back to the West…
    231 Republic of Estonia on the Road Back to the West… Background and Reality of the Israeli Arms Deal, 1992/1993 Hain Rebas ABSTRACT In the early 1990s not a single Western government agreed to sell arms to the newly independent Estonia. As the constitutional government of Mart Laar (1992) declared a strong interest in Western collective security, even NATO membership, Soviet weapons became unacceptable and insupportable. In con- trast, a plentiful supply of highly vaunted Western arms was considered a guar- antee for the Republic’s continued independence and a precondition for future acceptance in Western security policy structures – and ultimately membership in NATO. Estonian businessman Leonid Apananski had tested the waters for a weap- ons deal with Israel already in the autumn of 1991. After Mr Laar’s government had taken office in October 1992, our negotiations and contacts with the Israeli partners continued in Tallinn, Israel and Helsinki. The contracts for a secret deal were signed in January 1993 in Tallinn. We purchased armaments for a rein- forced light infantry division and they were up to NATO standard. At a cost of 60 million US dollars they turned out more expensive than Chinese or Romanian weapons, but decidedly less expensive than European equivalents. Since Estonia lacked the financial resources for such a purchase at that time, the deal became possible only due to a favourable hire-purchase method, which took into account the expected economic growth of Estonia. The associated opportunities for increased economic, political and security cooperation with Israel, that the negotiated arms deal may have presented, were lost before they were fully envisaged.
    [Show full text]