Republican Experiment Tongmenghui

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Republican Experiment Tongmenghui Why did the Qing Fall? Republican experiment Sun YatSen (also Sun Zhongshan) and the Tongmenghui Last lesson we looked at the nascent nationalist sentiment that manifested as a result of the Post Boxer Reforms, Cixi’s failed attempt to reassert control and confidence. Radical constitutional reforms were posed which according to controversial yet best-selling author/historian Jung Chang show that Cixi was ‘a remarkable stateswoman’ who fought a misogynist court to ‘bring medieval China into the modern age’. The problem was, the reforms came much too late, and in most cases their implementation was superseded by the Revolution of 1911. Rana Mitter says: ‘The reforms might have had some chance of success in a country more unified and prosperous. However, the dynasty was seriously running low on people who had a vested interest in its survival’. The most significant pool of revolutionary and nationalist ideas made headway in Japan where 13,000 Chinese students and emigrants – mostly urban, were living. Feelings of resentment toward Japan due to the Treaty of Shiminoseki, were tempered by a growing respect for the nation’s ability to assert itself against foreign powers like Russia. Japan and China had experienced a sudden role- reversal – with China being the sick man of Asia, and the court deemed that Japan, of all the western powers, ‘was the most worthy to emulate’. This was to a large extent, because of the work and teachings of the revolutionary group the Tongmenghui and their leader, Sun YatSen. Sun Yatsen and the Tongmenghui The Tongmenghui, or initially Revive China Society, was formed in Tokyo, 1905 with the mission to create an insurrectionary army that would be strong enough to challenge the Qing. By 1911 its membership increased from 400 to 10,000. Its leader, Sun Yatsen was fiercely anti-Qing, regarding the imperial system as moribund. Influencing Sun were his peasant upbringing; his excellent international education and residence outside China; his exposure to a body of literature on republicanism and revolution in France and the United States, nascent reform and democratic social movements of his own country and of the West; and his understanding and appreciation for aspects of the works of Rousseau, Lincoln, Marx, Lenin and many others. Whereas Kang Youwei, Li Qichao and their followers hoped to make change from above and within with the Hundred Days Reforms, Sun Yatsen saw a need to start anew. His basic belief was that China would never modernise less it became a Republic. Sun in fact, became known as the Father of The Chinese Republic. His seditious views and an attempted uprising in Guangzhou in 1895 (called the Double 9th Rebellion) made him persona non grata and he lived in exile for the best part of 1895 to 1911, though he had learned a few valuable lessons. In the meantime, The Tongmenghui staged another 5 attempted uprisings and sponsored another three. Fairbank says, ‘Sun deserved an A for effort’. Moribund – in a dying state Seditious – conduct which the state views as insurrectionary Persona non grata – literally ‘an unwelcome person’. Cixi’s post-Boxer education reforms provided Sun with the opportunity to campaign for change in Japan. He wrote: At this time nearly all the provinces began to send students to Japan to receive their education there. Among the students that came to Tokyo there turned out to be many people with young and clear heads. They seized on revolutionary ideas, and soon entered the revolutionary movement. …All the arguments of the of that day, and all their thoughts, turned into revolutionary questions,…that found their way into China. This period I consider to be the beginning of the epoch of the wide development of the Chinese Revolutionary Movement’. Perspectives… The historian Michael Dillon, believes that whilst Sun is revered as the father and ideological architect of the 1911 Revolution, the unsung hero Zou Rong, played a more significant role than he with his book, or rather militant manifesto, The Revolutionary Army (1903). This book was deeply patriotic, passionate and doggedly anti Qing. The young author, who joined the revolutionary struggle after the Boxer Uprising, argued with that China needed a revolution such as seen in France or America, and that yes, it would ultimately have to be bloody and destructive. Zou Rong spent his early career in Japan encouraging students to join political clubs and came into contact with the Revive China Society. By this time, revolutionary books and pamphlets were exploding among Chinese University students in Japan, and his book was a favourite. The signs of change emanating from this group were referred to as ‘Young China’. Alas, Zou Rong died a prisoner in 1905 at age 19. Back to Sun and his Three Principles Arguably, Sun’s main contribution to the nationalist sentiment that was exploding just before the 1911 revolution was his ideological THE THREE PRINCIPLES OF THE PEOPLE. In 1905, Sun drafted an early version of his political doctrine ‘Eliminate the Manchus, Eliminate the Monarchy, Open the Road to Socialism’. Later, this would be revised to ‘the ethnic nation (minzu), the people's rights (minquan), and the well-being of the people (minsheng)’. In English, these principles have often been translated as nationalism, democracy, and Socialism. In Chinese, each of these principles contains the character min, which means “people.” Sun likened his principles to U.S. president Abraham Lincoln's ideals of government (expressed in the Gettysburg Address) “of the people” (nationalism), “by the people” (democracy), and “for the people” (Socialism). Nationalism China is the China for the Chinese. Only when imperialism is eliminated can there be peace. Democracy China and the West have different concepts of freedom and democracy, argued Sun. Westerners struggle for personal freedom. China must struggle for national freedom: Thus: China will become a republic with an elected President and parliament. This was to be implemented slowly and be guided like a dictatorship: a. Proposed 3 yr dictatorship to ensure stability b. Tutelage – 6 yrs where democratic procedures would be explained After 9 yrs, military government disbanded and a new constitution drawn Socialism (The A loose form of socialism aimed at improving the welfare of working People’s Livelihood) people. The lives of the poor must be improved, industry and transport should be modernised and 'land must be given to the tiller'. This meant that landlords' land should be given to peasants. The Revolution of 1911 The 1911 Revolution which ended thousands of years of imperial rule in China was triggered by an accidental explosion at the hands of young revolutionaries. It was only a matter of weeks between the explosion and the birth of the Republic. There were two immediate catalysts. 1. Railways and the Rights Recovery Movement: Railway construction was booming business in China. Foreign powers exerted pressures to extend the railway networks for trading purposes offering loans to the Qing. The massive Boxer indemnity made these foreign loans very attractive. The results of foreign activity can be seen in the mileage of Chinese track completed in this period: 280 miles between 1896 and 1899, and 3,222 miles between 1900 and 1905 Strong nationalist sentiment was however growing in China. As part of this new groundswell, people in many provinces of China began pressing for a ‘rights-recovery’ movement. The aim was to raise money through local bonds so that the Chinese could buy back the railroad rights, and regain control of their own transportation system. However, in 1910, the Qing decided to nationalise the rail work. Consequently, The Qing borrowed up to 16 million pounds from a foreign banking consortium to continue significant railway expansion – particularly on the Wuhan-Canton, and Wuhan-Chengdu lines. Chinese in the provinces were outraged by this shameful capitulation to foreigners and the further indebtedness to foreigners. 2. Oops, um. A Bomb went off. What the heck do we do? On the 10th October 1911 – a date come to be known as the Double Tenth Revolution, New Army troops with connections to the Tongmenghui were assembling a bomb in the triple city of Wuhan (Hubei Province). They were spurred by the nationalisation of the railways. Unfortunately, their schemes were interrupted when a bomb accidently exploded, sparking the curiosity of Qing authorities. Rather than be caught, Wuhan garrison rebelled. A rash of surrounding provinces followed suit. In fact, within 6 weeks, fifteen of China’s 24 provinces had declared independence from the Qing. The rebel leaders in the provinces were unsurprisingly. Tongmenghui members, New Army Officers and members of the Provincial Assemblies. By 29th December, a provisional government of the Republic of China was proclaimed at Nanjing. On 1st January, Sun was inaugurated as the Provisional President. However, this would not last long, and besides, the Qing still held power within Beijing, albeit, under the command of a 6 year old boy. REVIEW QUESTIONS 1. What triggered the 1911 (Double Tenth) Revolution? 2. Who was Sun Yat-sen? How did he rally anti-Qing sentiment? 3. Where, do you believe the most substantial challenges to the Qing came from? 4. Using your own knowledge, explain the part played by overseas students in Japan in the development of the first Revolution. The Railway Dispute 5. Why were the Railways an immediate catalyst to the 1911 Revolution? A Republic 6. Complete extra reading and find the role Sun Yat-sen played in the Double Tenth. Where was he when the revolution broke out? 7 When was he sworn in as President? .
Recommended publications
  • Historical Appraisal
    Serial No.: N24 Historic Building Appraisal Pak Tsz Lane, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong Located in the bustling Central district, Pak (Tsz Lane 百子里) can Historical arguably be considered to be a cradle for the 1911 Chinese Revolution under Interest th the leadership of Dr. Sun Yat-sen (Sun Yixian, 孫逸仙). During the late 19 and early 20th centuries, it was a meeting place for the Chinese revolutionaries notably Tse Tsan-tai (Xie Zantai, 謝纘泰) and Yeung Ku-wan (Yang Quyun, 楊衢雲 ) for discussion of political affairs and plotting rebellions that eventually led to the downfall of the Qing dynasty. Yeung Ku-wan (楊衢雲) founded Foo Yan Man Ser (Furen wenshe, 輔仁 文社, “Literary Society for the Promotion of Benevolence”) (the Society) in the premises of No. 1 Pak Tsz Lane on 13 March 1892, and the Society’s motto was “Ducit Amor Patriae” (in English: “Love of country leads [me]”). The sixteen members of the Society , who always held meetings in private to discuss political issues and the future of China, had all been educated in Hong Kong and most of them were employed as teachers or clerks in government offices or shipping companies. Several of these men joined Hsing Chung Hui (Xingzhonghui, 興中會, “Revive China Society ”) when it was founded in 1895, and Yeung was the President of the Hong Kong bra nch of Hsing Chung Hui. Yeung Ku-wan was shot dead in his residence in No. 52 Gage Street, at the end of Pak Tsz Lane. The murder took place in the evening of 10 January 1901, when he was holding his English class for boys.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes and References
    Notes and References Front and Introduction 1. Hu Yaobang's interview with Selig Harrison, Far Eastern Economic Review, 26 July 1986. 2. Ma Ying-cheou's interview with the author, Taipei, June 1989. 1 Geography and Early History On Taiwan's topography, see Anon. (1960) and Hseih (1964). On pre-history, see Chai (1967), Davidson (1988) and God­ dard (1966). Early contacts with the mainland Davidson (1988), Goddard (1966) and Reischauer and Fair­ bank (1958). Early foreign contacts Davidson (1988), Goddard (1966), Hsu (1970) and Reischauer and Fairbank (1958). Taiwan under the Dutch Campbell (1903), Davidson (1988) and Goddard (1966). The Koxinga interregnum Croizier (1977), Hsu (1970) and Kessler (1976). The 'Wild East' Davidson (1988), Goddard (1966) and Gold (1986). Taiwan joins international politics Broomhall (1982), Davidson (1988), Hibbert (1970), Hsu (1970), Wang and Hao (1980) and Yen (1965). Early modernisation Goddard (1966), Gold (1986) and Kerr (1974). 246 Notes 247 The Japanese annexation Davidson (1988), Hsu (1970), Jansen (1980), Kerr (1974), Li (1956), Reischauer and Fairbank (1958), Smith and Liu (1980) and Wang and Hao (1980). Taiwan under the Japanese Behr (1989), Davidson (1988), Gold (1986), Ho (1978), Kerr (1974) and Mendel (1970). REFERENCES l. The 'Dragon Myth' is cited in Davidson (1988). 2. Quoted in Campbell (1903). 3. Quoted in Hsu (1970). 4. Quoted in Gold (1986). 5. Quoted in Davidson (1988). 6. Fairbank (1972). 2 The Kuomintang The Kuomintang in 1945 Belden (1973), Bianco (1971), China White Paper (1967), Harrison (1976), Kerr (1974), Loh (1965), Seagrave (1985) and Tuchman (1972). Sun Yat-sen and the origins of the KMT Bianco (1971), Chan (1976), Creel (1953), Fairbank (1987), Gold (1986), Harrison (1976), Hsu (1970), Isaacs (1951), Schiffrin (1968), Spence (1982) and Tan (1971).
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Life and Death Images of Exceptional Women and Chinese Modernity Wei Hu University of South Carolina
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations 2017 Beyond Life And Death Images Of Exceptional Women And Chinese Modernity Wei Hu University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Part of the Comparative Literature Commons Recommended Citation Hu, W.(2017). Beyond Life And Death Images Of Exceptional Women And Chinese Modernity. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/4370 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BEYOND LIFE AND DEATH IMAGES OF EXCEPTIONAL WOMEN AND CHINESE MODERNITY by Wei Hu Bachelor of Arts Beijing Language and Culture University, 2002 Master of Laws Beijing Language and Culture University, 2005 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Comparative Literature College of Arts and Sciences University of South Carolina 2017 Accepted by: Michael Gibbs Hill, Major Professor Alexander Jamieson Beecroft, Committee Member Krista Jane Van Fleit, Committee Member Amanda S. Wangwright, Committee Member Cheryl L. Addy, Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School © Copyright by Wei Hu, 2017 All Rights Reserved. ii DEDICATION To My parents, Hu Quanlin and Liu Meilian iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS During my graduate studies at the University of South Carolina and the preparation of my dissertation, I have received enormous help from many people. The list below is far from being complete. First of all, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my academic advisor, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Min Bao in Creating Public Opinion for the Revolution of 1911
    2018 3rd International Social Sciences and Education Conference (ISSEC 2018) Role of Min Bao in Creating Public Opinion for the Revolution of 1911 Zhang Yongxia School of Arts and Law, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China, 430070 Keywords: Min Bao; The Revolution of 1911; creation of public opinion Abstract: As an official organ of Tongmenghui, Min Bao played an important role in creating public opinion for the revolution of 1911. This paper expounds the historical background at that time and how Min Bao created public opinion, and then clarifies why this magazine has had such a wide influence. Through introducing revolution situations and social ideological trends in foreign countries and infusing revolutionary thoughts into the readers, Min Bao inspired revolutionaries to fight for the revolutionary ambitions with the spirit of sacrifice and striving, thus helping them to shape their life value outlooks, form their revolutionary convictions and develop their revolutionary behavior patterns. 1. Introduction The Revolution of 1911 was a milestone in China's history. In reviewing the course of the Revolution of 1911, Sun Yat-sen spoke highly of the role of bourgeois revolutionary newspapers and magazines in promoting the revolutionary cause [1]. The bourgeois revolutionist Feng Ziyou once said, "The foundation of Republic of China should be attributed to the military actions and the propaganda by the Chinese Revolutionary Party, between which the propaganda was more powerful and widely-influenced." Among various bourgeois revolutionary newspapers and magazines, Min Bao played a great role in promoting the dissemination of bourgeois democratic revolutionary thoughts, eliminating the reformers' pernicious influence, of the reformists, facilitating the formation of the revolutionary spirit, and improving the revolutionary situation.
    [Show full text]
  • China's 1911 Revolution
    www.hoddereducation.co.uk/historyreview Volume 23, Number 1, September 2020 Revision China’s 1911 Revolution Nicholas Fellows Test your knowledge of the 1911 Revolution in China and the events preceding it with these multiple-choice questions. Answers on the final page Questions 1 When did the First Opium War start? 1837 1838 1839 1840 2 What term was used to describe the agreements China was forced to sign with the West following its defeat? Unfair Treaties Unequal Treaties Concession Treaties Compromise Treaties 3 Which dynasty ruled china at the time of the Opium Wars? Ming Qing Yuan Song 4 When did the Second Opium War start? 1856 1857 1858 1859 5 What event started the war? Macartney incident Beijing affair Dagu Fort clash Arrow Incident 6 Which country destroyed a Chinese fleet in Fuzhou in 1884? Britain Germany France Spain 7 Which country took Korea from China in 1894? France Japan Britain Russia 8 Which country occupied much of Manchuria? Russia Japan Britain France 9 Which country took the port of Weihaiwei? Russia Japan Britain France 10 When did the Boxer rising start? 1899 1900 1901 1902 11 What provoked the start of the Boxer Rising? Loss of land Increase in the opium trade Western missionaries Development of railways Hodder & Stoughton © 2019 www.hoddereducation.co.uk/historyreview www.hoddereducation.co.uk/historyreview 12 Whose ambassador was shot at the start of the rising? German French British Russian 13 Who wrote 'The Revolutionary Army' in 1903 Sun Yat-sen Zou Rong Li Hongzhang Lu Xun 14 Who organised the Revolutionary
    [Show full text]
  • Enfry Denied Aslan American History and Culture
    In &a r*tm Enfry Denied Aslan American History and Culture edited by Sucheng Chan Exclusion and the Chinese Communify in America, r88z-ry43 Edited by Sucheng Chan Also in the series: Gary Y. Okihiro, Cane Fires: The Anti-lapanese Moaement Temple University press in Hawaii, t855-ry45 Philadelphia Chapter 6 The Kuomintang in Chinese American Kuomintang in Chinese American Communities 477 E Communities before World War II the party in the Chinese American communities as they reflected events and changes in the party's ideology in China. The Chinese during the Exclusion Era The Chinese became victims of American racism after they arrived in Him Lai Mark California in large numbers during the mid nineteenth century. Even while their labor was exploited for developing the resources of the West, they were targets of discriminatory legislation, physical attacks, and mob violence. Assigned the role of scapegoats, they were blamed for society's multitude of social and economic ills. A populist anti-Chinese movement ultimately pressured the U.S. Congress to pass the first Chinese exclusion act in 1882. Racial discrimination, however, was not limited to incoming immi- grants. The established Chinese community itself came under attack as The Chinese settled in California in the mid nineteenth white America showed by words and deeds that it considered the Chinese century and quickly became an important component in the pariahs. Attacked by demagogues and opportunistic politicians at will, state's economy. However, they also encountered anti- Chinese were victimizedby criminal elements as well. They were even- Chinese sentiments, which culminated in the enactment of tually squeezed out of practically all but the most menial occupations in the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882.
    [Show full text]
  • A RE-EVALUATION of CHIANG KAISHEK's BLUESHIRTS Chinese Fascism in the 1930S
    A RE-EVALUATION OF CHIANG KAISHEK’S BLUESHIRTS Chinese Fascism in the 1930s A Dissertation Submitted to the School of Oriental and African Studies of the University of London in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy DOOEUM CHUNG ProQuest Number: 11015717 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 11015717 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 2 Abstract Abstract This thesis considers the Chinese Blueshirts organisation from 1932 to 1938 in the context of Chiang Kaishek's attempts to unify and modernise China. It sets out the terms of comparison between the Blueshirts and Fascist organisations in Europe and Japan, indicating where there were similarities and differences of ideology and practice, as well as establishing links between them. It then analyses the reasons for the appeal of Fascist organisations and methods to Chiang Kaishek. Following an examination of global factors, the emergence of the Blueshirts from an internal point of view is considered. As well as assuming many of the characteristics of a Fascist organisation, especially according to the Japanese model and to some extent to the European model, the Blueshirts were in many ways typical of the power-cliques which were already an integral part of Chinese politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    Translating Revolution in Twentieth-Century China and France Diana King Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2017 © 2017 Diana King All rights reserved ABSTRACT Translating Revolution in Twentieth-Century China and France Diana King In “Translating Revolution in Twentieth-Century China and France,” I examine how the two countries translated each other’s revolutions during critical moments of political and cultural crisis (the 1911 Revolution, the May Fourth Movement (1919), the Cultural Revolution (1966-76), and May 1968 in France), and subsequently (or simultaneously), how that knowledge was mobilized in practice and shaped the historical contexts in which it was produced. Drawing upon a broad range of discourses including political journals, travel narratives, films and novels in French, English and Chinese, I argue that translation served as a key site of knowledge production, shaping the formulation of various political and cultural projects from constructing a Chinese national identity to articulating women’s rights to thinking about radical emancipation in an era of decolonization. While there have been isolated studies on the influence of the French Revolution in early twentieth-century China, and the impact of the Chinese Cultural Revolution on the development of French Maoism and French theory in the sixties, there have been few studies that examine the circulation of revolutionary ideas and practices across multiple historical moments and cultural contexts. In addition, the tendency of much current scholarship to focus exclusively on the texts of prominent French or Chinese intellectuals overlooks the vital role played by translation, and by non-elite thinkers, writers, students and migrant workers in the cross-fertilization of revolutionary discourses and practices.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Criticism of the Book "China's Destiny"'
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified April 07, 1945 Chen Boda, 'Criticism of the Book "China's Destiny"' Citation: “Chen Boda, 'Criticism of the Book "China's Destiny"',” April 07, 1945, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, RGASPI f. 17, op. 128, d. 823, l. 70-78. Translated by Gary Goldberg. http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/121815 Summary: Excerpts from the Russian translations of Chen Boda's published criticism of Jiang Jieshi's "China's Destiny." Original Language: Russian Contents: English Translation Scan of Original Document CRITICISM OF THE BOOK "CHINA’S DESTINY". Chen Boda [Chen Pei-ta] [handwritten below the title: "To the file. For storage. [illegible signature], 7 April 1945"] CRITICISM OF THE BOOK "CHINA’S DESTINY" Chen Boda From the moment of the publication of Jiang Jieshi's [Chiang Kai-shek’s] book, "China’s Destiny" many people in Chongqing have begun to suspect that the actual author of the book is Tao Xisheng. It was not clear for many why the leader of the Guomindang [Kuomintang], Jiang Jieshi, permitted a person so widely known for ties with the Manchu traitors, for a defense of fascism, for hostility to the United Nations, and for his ideological ties to Wang Jingwei, which still continue to exist, to write this work. These people are at a loss at to whether the Guomindang is really so barren of educated people that it was impossible to find someone else for this work. Several days after the publication of "China’s Destiny" Tao Xisheng wrote a laudatory article for this book which was published by the Central Daily on the first page as an editorial.
    [Show full text]
  • {DOWNLOAD} Sun Yat-Sen Ebook Free Download
    SUN YAT-SEN PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Marie-Claire Bergere, Janet Lloyd | 492 pages | 01 Jan 2000 | Stanford University Press | 9780804740111 | English | Palo Alto, United States Sun Yat-sen | Marie-Claire Bergère Translated by Janet Lloyd However, as soon as he established his government in Guangzhou, Sun Yat-sen came into conflict with entrenched local power. His militarist government was not based on the Provisional Constitution of , which the anti-Beiyang forces vowed to defend in the Constitutional Protection War. In addition, he was elected president by a parliament that did not meet the rules for a quorum following its move from Beijing. Thus, many politicians and warlords alike challenged the legitimacy of his militarist government. Sun Yat-sen's use of heavy taxes to fund the Northern Expedition to militarily unify China was at odds with the ideas of reformers such as Chen Jiongming, who advocated establishing Guangdong as a "model province" before launching a costly military campaign. In sum, the military government was opposed by the internationally recognized Beiyang government in the north, Chen's Guangdong provincial government in the south, and other provincial powers that shifted alliances according to their own benefit. In , in order to hasten the conquest of China, he began a policy of active cooperation with the Chinese Communists. By this time, he was convinced that the only hope for a unified China lay in a military conquest from his base in the south, followed by a period of political tutelage that would culminate in the transition to democracy. He then prepared for the later Northern Expedition, with help from foreign powers, until his death.
    [Show full text]
  • The Art of Fan Tchunpi
    , 1937, oil on canvas Self-Portrait Between Tradition and Modernity: The Art of Fan Tchunpi September 7–December 8, 2013 | Hood Museum of Art, Dartmouth College This exhibition explores the extraordinary life and work of Fan Tchunpi (1898–1986), one of the most important and pro- lific Chinese women artists of the modern era. As the first solo exhibition of the artist’s work since her 1984 retrospective at the Musée Cernuschi (Asian Art Museum) in Paris, Between Tradition and Modernity examines Fan Tchunpi’s search for an artistic language that would speak for the self and the nation in an age of crisis and revolution. Fan Tchunpi was born on March 3, 1898, into a wealthy family in Fuzhou, the seaport capital of Fujian Province on the southeast coast of China. In the early twentieth century, China witnessed the end of its old imperial system and the rise of a modern na- tion state. The collapse of the Qing Dynasty in 1911 and the establishment of the Republic of China in Nanjing in 1912 led artists, in their search for a new national identity, to travel and Fig. 1. Sunset on Lake Annecy, 1922, oil on canvas. This painting was made study abroad. After the overthrow of the Qing Dynasty, a group around the time of Fan Tchunpi’s wedding to Tsongming Tsen and depicts Lake Annecy and the spectacular mountain range that surrounds it. With its agitated, of young participants in the revolution was awarded with linear brushstrokes and heightened color effects, it reveals the lessons that Fan scholarships to study abroad, among them Fan Tchunpi’s elder Tchunpi learned from the work of Pierre Auguste Renoir, Claude Monet, and sister Fan Tchunying, who at the age of twenty-six had played other French impressionist painters during her studies in Paris and Bordeaux.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1911 Revolution and the Korean Independence Movement: the Road to Democratic Republicanism
    The 1911 Revolution and the Korean Independence Movement: The Road to Democratic Republicanism KIM Bong-jin 1. Foreword The Xing Zhonghui 興中会 (Revive China Society) started by Sun Yat-sen( 1866-1925) and Wang Zhaoming 汪兆銘( Wang Jingwei, 1883-1944) merged with the Hua Xinghui 華興会 established by Song Jiaoren 宋教仁 (1882-1913) and Huang Xing 黄興( 1874-1916) on August 20, 1905 in Tokyo to become the Zhongguo Tongmenghui 同盟会 (Chinese Revolutionary Alliance). Sun Yat-sen was selected to head the organization, and Huang Xing to run general affairs. Various documents were adopted, including the “mili- tary government proclamation,” “general articles of the Tongmenghui,” and “revolutionary strategy.” The Tongmenghui issued as their organizational publication the Minbao 民報, which adopted the general principles advocated by Sun of “expel the Manchus and restore China, establish a republic, and equalize land rights.” Subsequently, they fomented uprisings all over China, but all ended in failure. The Wuchang New Army successfully revolted against the Qing govern- ment on October 10, 1911. Other provinces followed suit by declaring inde- pendence from the central government. On January 1, 1912 the Provisional Government of the Republic of China was established in Nanjing, with Sun Yat-sen as provisional president. On February 12, however, Yuan Shikai (1859-1916) compelled the child emperor Puyi( 1906-1967) to abdicate. The next day Sun Yat-sen turned in his resignation as president and recommended to the provisional National Assembly that Yuan take the position. On February 15 the provisional National Assembly agreed on Yuan’s appointment and to designate Nanjing as the capital.
    [Show full text]