DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix I SHLAA Sites Summary Proformas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix I SHLAA Sites Summary Proformas Burnley SHLAA: Site Information Form Site Information Density and Yield SHLAA Ref: HEL/009 Site Area (Ha): 11.1 Category: Housing Standard Density: 25 dph - Housing Site Name: Site off Mount Lane, Overtown Initial Source IO Omission site (rural) of Supply: Street: Mount Lane, Overtown Theoretic Yield at Standard 280 Density Location: Overtown Sub Sources Anticpated Yield (m2 or 0 Ward: Cliviger with Worsthorne Ward Extant Planning Permission? No number of dwellings): Parish: Cliviger CP Allocation in Saved Local Plan: Rural Areas Suitability Achievability Attractive Site Location: Open Countryside adjoining named settlement Likely marketability of site: Current Land Use: Agricultural Local Housing/Commercial market/demand: Strong Green Belt: No Established Residential/ Greenfield/Brownfield: Greenfield Commercial Area?: Yes BMV Agricultural Land N/A Likely viability of site: Viable - subject to caveat (boundary Landscape/ Undulating farm land Availability Topography Ownership: Private Visual Visually prominent in long distance views Ownership notes/ Promoted for inclusion in the Local Prominence: evidence of Plan by local resident during Issues landowner and Options consultation Contaminated Land Register: No intentions: Estimated number of Landowners 1 Contamination Adjacent Sites of Potential Concern (mining; textile and Comments: dye works) Tenancies or restrictive covenants: Flood Zone: 1 Comments: Flood Risk Issues: Site considered unsuitable due to scale and location. Flood Map for Surface Water- Predominantly very low annual probability. Small areas of low annual probability. Flood depth less than Uncertainty over site availability. Not listed in GSS 2015 but 300mm. was identified as site for potential new allotments (Burnley Allotment Review 2011). Heritage Asset Comment: South of site within 100m of Grade II Listed LCC highways: Access preferred off Burnley Road due to Building. Any development would need to concerns that access onto Mount Lane would increase Listed Building assess impact. movements at Park road / Red Lees Road junctions. Conservation Area Mitigation measures dependant on size of devt and traffic generation. Traffic Speed on Burnley Road has previously Ancient Monument been an issue. Measures to improve sustainability (walking, Local List cycling, public transport) would be sought. TPO on site?: No Within or adj to an SSSI, SAC, SPA, NNR?: No Within or adj to a Biological Heritage Site, LNR: BHS Nature Conservation Comment BHS present (Low Side Banking). Ecological Network (Grassland) Conclusion including core & stepping stone habitat. Include/Exclude: Include Availability Conclusion: Not Available Suitability Conclusion: Not Suitable Achievability Conclusion: Achievable 400m of a bus stop? Yes Developable: No 800m of a train station? No 30 minutes public transport time of key borough Yes Local Plan services? In Issues and Options LP: No 8km cycling distance of key borough services? Yes In Preferred Options LP: No 400m of a defined on or off-road cycle route: Yes In Proposed Submission LP: No Within 1200m of a primary school, GP, shop, No community facility? Developable but less than 0.4 ha: N/A Burnley SHLAA: Site Information Form Site Information Density and Yield SHLAA Ref: HEL/010 Site Area (Ha): 3.45 Category: Housing Standard Density: 30 dph - Housing Site Name: Lanehead Quarry Initial Source Desktop of Supply: Street: Islington Close Theoretic Yield at Standard 104 Density Location: Burnley Sub Sources BBC Anticpated Yield (m2 or 0 Ward: Lanehead Extant Planning Permission? No number of dwellings): Parish: Allocation in Saved Local Plan: Part of site Protected Open Space - Enclosed Floo Suitability Achievability Significant constraints likely to affect marketability and Site Location: Within urban boundary Likely marketability of site: developable area Current Land Use: Open Space Local Housing/Commercial market/demand: Fair Green Belt: No Established Residential/ Greenfield/Brownfield: Mainly Greenfield Commercial Area?: Yes BMV Agricultural Land N/A Likely viability of site: Unviable Landscape/ Higher northern part of site includes a playground, play Availability Topography centre a grassed area and pitches. Southern part includes former quarry - partly treed and a car park. Ownership: Council (BBC) Visual Car park at the bottom of the site well screened, lying well Ownership notes/ The Council is actively looking at its Prominence: below the levels of houses to the west and north east of evidence of landholdings to assess development the site Cottages/restaurant on Marsden Lane overlook landowner potential in particular to stimulate the Contaminated Land Register: Site of Potential Concern intentions: housing market Estimated number of Landowners 1 Contamination Quarrying Comments: Tenancies or restrictive covenants: Flood Zone: 1 Comments: Flood Risk Issues: Site contains a play area, play centre and playground, car Flood Map for Surface Water - areas of low, medium and high annual parking area and disused quarry. Public ROWs cross site. probability in southern part of site. Part of site within CA. EA: Ref K1/12/063: The site was infilled before the controls imposed under the Control of Pollution Act. Not considered Heritage Asset Comment: A significant part of the site (south) lies to be filled. Fly-tipped only. within the Jib Hill Conservation Area. Listed Building Development should ensure that the LCC highways: Access off Marsden Road would be character and appearance of the CA is Conservation Area substandard. Access should be taken off Underley Street. preserved or enhanced.Sites that introduce Some junction improvements would be required in Ancient Monument clear harm to the significance of the anticipation of the increased traffic precise nature would Conservation Area, with little prospect of Local List depend on the size of the development mitigation should be considered Measures to improve sustainability (walking, cycling, public TPO on site?: No inappropriate. transport) would be sought. Within or adj to an SSSI, SAC, SPA, NNR?: No Within or adj to a Biological Heritage Site, LNR: No Nature Conservation Comment Potential bat habitat. Conclusion Include/Exclude: Include Availability Conclusion: Available Suitability Conclusion: Not Suitable Achievability Conclusion: Not Achievable 400m of a bus stop? Yes Developable: No 800m of a train station? No 30 minutes public transport time of key borough Yes Local Plan services? In Issues and Options LP: No 8km cycling distance of key borough services? Yes In Preferred Options LP: No 400m of a defined on or off-road cycle route: Yes In Proposed Submission LP: No Within 1200m of a primary school, GP, shop, Yes Developable but less than 0.4 ha: community facility? N/A Burnley SHLAA: Site Information Form Site Information Density and Yield SHLAA Ref: HEL/012 Site Area (Ha): 0.54 Category: Housing Standard Density: 30 dph - Housing Site Name: Bergen Street Initial Source Desktop of Supply: Street: Bergen Street Theoretic Yield at Standard 16 Density Location: Burnley Sub Sources UCS Anticpated Yield (m2 or 16 Ward: Rosegrove with Lowerhouse Extant Planning Permission? No number of dwellings): Parish: Allocation in Saved Local Plan: Suitability Achievability Potentially attractive to a small/medium local builder Site Location: Within urban boundary Likely marketability of site: Current Land Use: Residential gardens/Allotments Local Housing/Commercial market/demand: Fair Green Belt: No Established Residential/ Greenfield/Brownfield: Greenfield Commercial Area?: Yes BMV Agricultural Land N/A Likely viability of site: Viable Landscape/ Triangular site to rear of terraced properties, currently Availability Topography used as allotments / gardens. Gradient is flat. Ownership: Private Visual All three sides of this triangular site are overlooked by Ownership notes/ Site considered for residential Prominence: properties. evidence of development throughthe UCS landowner prepared in 1998 and 2004 Contaminated Land Register: No intentions: Estimated number of Landowners 1 Contamination None Comments: Tenancies or restrictive covenants: Flood Zone: 1 Comments: Flood Risk Issues: LCC highways: Access points limited and would be close to Flood Map for Surface Water - Very low annual probability. Rosegrove Signals, would have concerns that the turning manoeuvres would lead to additional delays/congestion in the vicinity of the junction. Would not consider the site suitable for development. Heritage Asset Comment: Vehicular access could be provided. Listed Building No recent indication of availability and site in use as Conservation Area residential gardens/allotments providing an amenity for residents in a high density area of terraced housing Ancient Monument without gardens. Local List TPO on site?: No Within or adj to an SSSI, SAC, SPA, NNR?: No Within or adj to a Biological Heritage Site, LNR: No Nature Conservation Comment Conclusion Include/Exclude: Include Availability Conclusion: Not Available Suitability Conclusion: Suitable Achievability Conclusion: Achievable 400m of a bus stop? Yes Developable: No 800m of a train station? Yes 30 minutes public transport time of key borough Yes Local Plan services? In Issues and Options LP: No 8km cycling distance of key borough services? Yes In Preferred Options LP: No 400m of a defined on or off-road cycle route: Yes In Proposed Submission LP: No Within 1200m of a primary school, GP, shop, Yes Developable but less than 0.4 ha: community facility? N/A Burnley SHLAA: Site Information Form Site Information
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lancashire County Pension Fund Annual Report 2015/16 Comms:4801
    Lancashire County Pension Fund Annual Report 2015/16 comms:4801 www.lancashire.gov.uk 2 Lancashire County Pension Fund Annual Report 2015 / 2016 Contents Section Description Page A Management Structure 4 B Foreword by County Councillor Kevin Ellard, Chair of the Pension Fund Committee 6 C Governance of the Fund 8 D Administration of the Fund 12 E Knowledge and Skills Framework 18 F Investment Policy and Performance 22 G Accounts of the Fund 40 H Lancashire Local Pension Board Annual Report – 2015/16 106 I Actuarial Valuation 110 J Contacts 127 K Glossary 128 Appendices 5. Funding strategy statement (FSS) 1. Governance policy statement 6. Statement of investment principles (SIP) 2. Administration report 7. Actuarial valuation 3. Communication policy statement 8. List of member organisations at 31 March 2016 4. Pensions administration strategy statement Friargate student accommodation – Preston 4 Lancashire County Pension Fund Annual Report 2015 / 2016 A. Management structure Administering Authority Co-opted Blackpool Council Head of Pension Fund Lancashire County Council representative Abigail Leech M Smith Lancashire County Council Pension Director of Financial Resources Fund Committee Co-opted Lancashire Leaders’ Group N Kissock CPFA M Barron representative L Beavers P Rankin Actuary D Borrow E Pope Mercer G Dowding K Ellard (Chair) Co-opted Trade Union representative Auditor J Oakes P Crewe Grant Thornton M Otter J Tattersall M Parkinson (Deputy Chair) Property Solicitors C Pritchard Co-opted HE/FE sector representative Pinsent Masons
    [Show full text]
  • Rossendale Burnley Pendle Playing Pitch
    ROSSENDALE, PENDLE & BURNLEY STRATEGY & ACTION PLAN 2016 - 2026 Integrity, Innovation, Inspiration 1-2 Frecheville Court off Knowsley Street Bury BL9 0UF T 0161 764 7040 F 0161 764 7490 E [email protected] www.kkp.co.uk ROSSENDALE, PENDLE & BURNLEY STRATEGY & ACTION PLAN CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................. 1 PART 1: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 2 PART 2: VISION ............................................................................................................... 9 PART 3: OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................... 10 PART 4: SPORT SPECIFIC ISSUES SCENARIOS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .......... 11 PART 5: STRATEGIC RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................... 22 PART 6: ACTION PLAN ................................................................................................. 37 APPENDIX ONE: STRATEGIC CONTEXT ..................................................................... 77 APPENDIX TWO: FUNDING PLAN ................................................................................ 85 APPENDIX THREE: GLOSSARY ................................................................................... 89 ROSSENDALE, PENDLE & BURNLEY STRATEGY & ACTION PLAN LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AGP Artificial Grass Pitch 3G Third Generation turf (artificial turf) NGB National Governing Body
    [Show full text]
  • Rossendale Local Plan Flood Risk Incorporating Sequential Test Topic Paper
    ROSSENDALE LOCAL PLAN FLOOD RISK INCORPORATING SEQUENTIAL TEST TOPIC PAPER March 2019 Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 3 2 Background ..................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 National Context ..................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Regional / Local context .......................................................................................................... 8 3 Evidence base................................................................................................................................ 10 3.1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) ............................................................................... 10 3.2 Sustainability Appraisal (SA) ................................................................................................. 12 4 Applying the Sequential Test ........................................................................................................ 12 4.1 Site allocations ...................................................................................................................... 12 Proposed allocations in flood zone 1 ................................................................................................ 13 Proposed allocations in flood zone 2 ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Statement Main Text Volume 1 Proposed Three Wind
    ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT MAIN TEXT VOLUME 1 PROPOSED THREE WIND TURBINES ON LAND ADJACENT TO HAMELDON HILL WIND FARM May 2016 1 Environmental Statement This Environmental Statement (ES) is prepared for the submission for planning approval of three wind turbines on land adjacent to the Hameldon Hill Wind Farm. The statement is prepared by AAH Planning Consultants with contributions from: Copies of the ES can be obtained either through downloading from the website www.hameldonhillwindfarm.com or by contacting: AAH Planning Consultants, 2 Bar Lane, York, YO1 6JU Tel: 01904 629258 Email: [email protected] The cost of printing for paper copies will be charged at cost price to cover the cost incurred for printing and postage. DVD versions can also be provided at a cost of £10. Paper copies will also be available for public viewing at Burnley Borough Council’s planning department at Housing and Development Control, Contact Centre, 9 Parker Lane, Burnley, BB11 2BY during the following office hours: 9am to 5pm Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and Friday 10am to 5pm on Wednesdays The Non-Technical Summary of the ES is also available free of charge upon request and again available for download from the above mentioned website. 2 Contents 1.0 Introduction to the Proposal ....................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Approach to Environmental Assessment .................................................................................... 5 3.0 Site Description ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Croal/Irwell Local Environment Agency Plan Environmental Overview October 1998
    Croal/Irwell Local Environment Agency Plan Environmental Overview October 1998 NW - 10/98-250-C-BDBS E n v ir o n m e n t Ag e n c y Croal/lrwell 32 Local Environment Agency Plan Map 1 30 30 E n v ir o n m e n t Ag e n c y Contents Croal/lrwell Local Environment Agency Plan (LEAP) Environmental Overview Contents 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Air Quality 2 1.3 Water Quality 7 1.4 Effluent Disposal 12 1.5 Hydrology. 15 1.6 Hydrogeology 17 1.7 Water Abstraction - Surface and Groundwater 18 1.8 Area Drainage 20 1.9 Waste Management 29 1.10 Fisheries 36 1.11 . Ecology 38 1.12 Recreation and Amenity 45 1.13 Landscape and Heritage 48 1.14 Development . 5 0 1.15 Radioactive Substances 56 / 1.16 Agriculture 57 Appendix 1 - Glossary 60 Appendix 2 - Abbreviations ' 66 Appendix 3 - River Quality Objectives (RQOs) 68 Appendix 4 - Environment Agency Leaflets and Reports 71 Croal/lrwell LEAP l Environmental Overview Maps Number Title Adjacent to Page: 1 The Area Cover 2 Integrated Pollution Control (IPC) 3 3 Water Quality: General Quality Assessment Chemical Grading 1996 7 4 Water Quality: General Quality Assessment: Biological Grading 1995 8 5 Water Quality: Compliance with proposed Short Term River Ecosystem RQOs 9 6 Water Quality: Compliance with proposed Long Term River Ecosystem RQOs 10 7 EC Directive Compliance 11 8 Effluent Disposal 12 9 Rainfall 15 10 Hydrometric Network 16 11 Summary Geological Map: Geology at Surface (simplified) 17 12 Licensed Abstractions>0.5 Megalitre per day 18 13 Flood Defence: River Network 21 14 Flood Defence: River Corridor
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2020
    NEW ERA ENTERPRISES ANNUAL REPORT JAN 2020 – MARCH 2021 NEW ERA ENTERPRISES (E. LANCS) LTD 62-64 Yorkshire Street Burnley Company no. 3286650 Page | 1 Emotional, Family Health and Engagement Hub Nursery Wellbeing Hub Hub Page | 2 Page | 3 Contents Welcome from our Chairperson Ann Marie ..................................................................... 3 New Era - Inspiring, transforming and connecting communities one life at a time ................ 5 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 5 Emotional Health & Wellbeing ....................................................................................... 7 Case Studies.......................................................................................................................... 9 Achievements .....................................................................................................................10 Thank you to the funders/partners that make this work possible! ...................................12 Family Support ............................................................................................................ 14 Case studies ........................................................................................................................16 Achievements .....................................................................................................................17 Thank you to the funders/partners that make this work possible! ...................................18
    [Show full text]
  • River Irwell Management Catchment – Evidence and Measures Greater
    River Irwell Management Catchment – Evidence and Measures Greater Manchester Combined Authority Water body output maps LIFE Integrated Project LIFE14IPE/UK/027 The Irwell Management Catchment Water body ID Water body Name GB112069064660 Irwell (Source to Whitewell Brook) GB112069064670 Whitewell Brook GB112069064641 Irwell (Cowpe Bk to Rossendale STW) GB112069064680 Limy Water GB112069064650 Ogden GB112069064620 Irwell (Rossendale STW to Roch) GB112069064610 Kirklees Brook GB112069060840 Irwell (Roch to Croal) GB112069061451 Irwell (Croal to Irk) GB112069064720 Roch (Source to Spodden) GB112069064690 Beal GB112069064730 Spodden GB112069064600 Roch (Spodden to Irwell) GB112069064710 Naden Brook GB112069061250 Whittle Brook (Irwell) GB112069064570 Eagley Brook GB112069064560 Astley Brook (Irwell) GB112069064530 Tonge GB112069064540 Middle Brook GB112069064550 Croal (including Blackshaw Brook) GB112069061161 Irk (Source to Wince Brook) GB112069061120 Wince Brook GB112069061131 Irk (Wince to Irwell) GB112069061452 Irwell / Manchester Ship Canal (Irk to confluence with Upper Mersey) GB112069061151 Medlock (Source to Lumb Brook) GB112069061152 Medlock (Lumb Brook to Irwell) GB112069061430 Folly Brook and Salteye Brook. GB112069064580 Bradshaw Brook Click on a water body to navigate to that map Water body name Issues: Comments provided during the Opportunity theme symbols Workshop on the 10th February • Lists the issues in the water Fisheries – barrier removal body and their causes Physical modifications Opportunities: • Based on the issues what Water quality are the main opportunities for the Partnership. This excludes water company issues and the Mitigation Measures Actions as these are presented as other opportunities below. Map of the waterbody indicating the location of Irwell Catchment Partnership Projects, Mitigation Measures Actions, Environment Agency sampling locations, Mitigation Measure Actions: consented discharges, and priority barriers for eel. • A list of the Mitigation Measures Actions identified in the water body by the Environment Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • School Place Provision Strategy 2017/18 to 2019/20
    School Place Provision Strategy Appendices 2017/18 to 2019/20 April 2019, Version 1.2 School Place Provision Strategy – 2017/18 to 2019/20 Appendix 1 – Map of Schools in Lancashire For further mapping of schools in Lancashire, please refer to the interactive map. Details of all schools in Lancashire are available via the webpage: http://www.lancashire.gov.uk/schools • 2 • School Place Provision Strategy – 2017/18 to 2019/20 Appendix 2 – Primary Planning Areas Lancaster District – Carnforth Primary Planning Area Carnforth Primary Planning Area is within the district of Lancaster, and is centred around the town of Carnforth. Summary of latest information for the primary planning area is: LCC No School Status Net Capacity NOR Jan 19 Surplus / Shortfall 01019 Over Kellet Wilson's Endowed CoE Voluntary Aided (CE) 126 132 -6 01028 Carnforth Christ Church. CofE. VA Voluntary Aided (CE) 150 102 48 01031 Our Lady of Lourdes Catholic Voluntary Aided (C) 112 89 23 01032 Warton Archbishop Hutton's Voluntary Controlled 177 107 70 01044 Carnforth North Road Community Community 208 163 45 Carnforth Primary Planning Area 773 593 180 * NOR is number on roll for reception year to Year 6 only (excluding nursery aged pupils or early years) 5 Year Forecast Summary for Carnforth Primary Planning Area Future Net Capacity* Forecast NOR in Surplus / Shortfall Primary Planning Area by 2023/24 January 2024 in January 2024 Carnforth Primary Planning Area 773 458 315 * Future Net Capacity takes account of any school expansion works or other schemes will which alter the net capacity within 5 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Discharge Consents Irwell Catchment
    Review of discharge consents. River Irwell catchment report Item Type monograph Publisher North West Water Authority Download date 25/09/2021 14:27:27 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/27235 RSD2/A20 REVIEW OF DISCHARGE CONSENTS IRWELL CATCHMENT REPORT Contents 1. Introduction 2. Physical Description of Catchment 3. River Water - Chemical Classification 4 . Discharges and Consents 4.1 Authority Sewage Treatment Works 4.2 Authority Trade Effluent Discharges 4.3 Private Trade Effluent Discharges 4.4 Private Sewage Treatment Works 4 .5 Storm Sewage Overflows 5. Special Cases MARCH 1979 Introduction The purpose of this Report is to make recommendations for the revision of consents for discharges within the catchment of the River Irwell, downstream to and including the River Medlock in Manchester. This revision has the sole objective of recognising the present effluent and river water quality - proposals for long term river water quality objectives are to be put forward in other Reports. The report identifies the existing situation regarding the legal status of effluent discharges from Authority and non-Authority owned installations within the catchment, details the determinand concentration limits included in existing discharge consents (where appropriate) and proposes the limits to be included in the reviewed consents. The reviewed consents will reflect the quality of efflu­ ent achievable by good operation of the existing plant based on 1977 effluent quality data but taking into account any improvements, extensions etc. that have been or are about to be carried out and any known further industrial and/or housing development in the works drainage area. The proposed limits are intended to be the 95% compliance figures rather than the 80% compliance figures inferred in existing consents and hence the new figures will obviously be higher than the old.
    [Show full text]
  • Education Indicators: 2022 Cycle
    Contextual Data Education Indicators: 2022 Cycle Schools are listed in alphabetical order. You can use CTRL + F/ Level 2: GCSE or equivalent level qualifications Command + F to search for Level 3: A Level or equivalent level qualifications your school or college. Notes: 1. The education indicators are based on a combination of three years' of school performance data, where available, and combined using z-score methodology. For further information on this please follow the link below. 2. 'Yes' in the Level 2 or Level 3 column means that a candidate from this school, studying at this level, meets the criteria for an education indicator. 3. 'No' in the Level 2 or Level 3 column means that a candidate from this school, studying at this level, does not meet the criteria for an education indicator. 4. 'N/A' indicates that there is no reliable data available for this school for this particular level of study. All independent schools are also flagged as N/A due to the lack of reliable data available. 5. Contextual data is only applicable for schools in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland meaning only schools from these countries will appear in this list. If your school does not appear please contact [email protected]. For full information on contextual data and how it is used please refer to our website www.manchester.ac.uk/contextualdata or contact [email protected]. Level 2 Education Level 3 Education School Name Address 1 Address 2 Post Code Indicator Indicator 16-19 Abingdon Wootton Road Abingdon-on-Thames
    [Show full text]
  • River Basin Management Plan North West River Basin District
    River Basin Management Plan North West River Basin District Annex C: Actions to deliver objectives Contents C.1 Introduction 3 C.2 Actions we can all take 9 C.3 All sectors 11 C.4 Agriculture and rural land management 14 C.5 Angling and conservation 32 C.6 Central government 45 C.7 Environment Agency 52 C.8 Industry, manufacturing and other business 67 C.9 Local and regional government 78 C.10 Mining and quarrying 87 C.11 Navigation 92 C.12 Urban and transport 96 C.13 Water industry 102 Environment Agency River Basin Management Plan, North West River Basin District 2 Annex C: Actions to deliver objectives December 2009 C.1 Introduction This annex sets out tables of the actions (the programmes of measures) that are proposed for each sector. Actions are the on the ground activities that will implemented to manage the pressures on the water environment and achieve the objectives of this plan. Further information relating to these actions and how they have been developed is given in: • Annex B: Objectives for waters in the North West River Basin District This gives information on the current status and environmental objectives that have been set and when it is planned to achieve these. • Annex D: Protected area objectives (including programmes for Natura 2000) This gives details of the location of protected areas, the monitoring networks for these, the environmental objectives and additional information on programmes of work for Natura 2000 sites. • Annex E: Actions appraisal This gives information about how we have set the water body objectives for this plan and how we have selected the actions.
    [Show full text]
  • 07514520059.501 Burnley Wildlife and Habitat Survey Version A.0
    December 2007 - i - 07514520059.501 Burnley Wildlife and Habitat Survey Version A.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Objectives................................................................................................1 1.2 Limitations ...............................................................................................1 2.0 LEGISLATIVE BACKGROUND AND POLICY FRAMEWORK.................. 3 2.1 Planning Policy........................................................................................3 2.2 The Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006...................4 2.3 Biodiversity Action Planning ....................................................................4 2.4 National Government Performance Indicators ........................................5 3.0 METHODOLOGY........................................................................................ 6 3.1 Desk Study ..............................................................................................6 3.2 Field Survey.............................................................................................6 3.3 Arrangement of Access ...........................................................................7 3.4 Database and GIS ...................................................................................7 4.0 RESULTS.................................................................................................... 9 4.1 Desk Study
    [Show full text]