DOCSLIB.ORG

Lancashire County Pension Fund Annual Report 2015/16 Comms:4801

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lancashire County Pension Fund Annual Report 2015/16 Comms:4801 Lancashire County Pension Fund Annual Report 2015/16 comms:4801 www.lancashire.gov.uk 2 Lancashire County Pension Fund Annual Report 2015 / 2016 Contents Section Description Page A Management Structure 4 B Foreword by County Councillor Kevin Ellard, Chair of the Pension Fund Committee 6 C Governance of the Fund 8 D Administration of the Fund 12 E Knowledge and Skills Framework 18 F Investment Policy and Performance 22 G Accounts of the Fund 40 H Lancashire Local Pension Board Annual Report – 2015/16 106 I Actuarial Valuation 110 J Contacts 127 K Glossary 128 Appendices 5. Funding strategy statement (FSS) 1. Governance policy statement 6. Statement of investment principles (SIP) 2. Administration report 7. Actuarial valuation 3. Communication policy statement 8. List of member organisations at 31 March 2016 4. Pensions administration strategy statement Friargate student accommodation – Preston 4 Lancashire County Pension Fund Annual Report 2015 / 2016 A. Management structure Administering Authority Co-opted Blackpool Council Head of Pension Fund Lancashire County Council representative Abigail Leech M Smith Lancashire County Council Pension Director of Financial Resources Fund Committee Co-opted Lancashire Leaders’ Group N Kissock CPFA M Barron representative L Beavers P Rankin Actuary D Borrow E Pope Mercer G Dowding K Ellard (Chair) Co-opted Trade Union representative Auditor J Oakes P Crewe Grant Thornton M Otter J Tattersall M Parkinson (Deputy Chair) Property Solicitors C Pritchard Co-opted HE/FE sector representative Pinsent Masons A Schofield A Milloy DWF K Sedgewick D Westley Custodian Independent Property Valuer D Whipp Northern Trust Cushman & Wakefield B Yates Independent Investment Advisors Corporate Governance Advisor Co-opted Blackburn with Darwen E Lambert PIRC Borough Council representative A Devitt R Whittle Performance Measurement Director of Lancashire County Northern Trust Pension Fund (to 31/3/16) G Graham Lancashire County Pension Fund Annual Report 2015 / 2016 5 AVC Providers Fund Managers Knight Frank Investors Prudential AGF Investments Kreos Capital Equitable Life Arclight Capital Partners Madrileña Red de Gas Ares Management M&G Investments Babson Capital Management MFG Investments Legal Advisors (other than property) Baillie Gifford MFS Investment Management In-House Bluebay Asset Management Monarch Alternative Capital MacFarlanes Morgan Stanley Investment Management Eversheds Capital Dynamics Muzinich & Co Clifford Chance Christofferson, Robb & Company Allen and Overy EQT Natixis Global Asset Management Taylor Wessing Neuberger Berman Guild Investments Ltd Addleshaw Goddard Gatefold Hayes LP Pacific Investment Management Company Global Infrastructure Partners Permira Debt Managers Tax Advisors Pictet Asset Management KPMG Hayfin Capital Management Prima Capital Advisors Heylo Housing Trust Bankers Highbridge Capital Management Robeco Asset Management National Westminster Highstar Capital SL Capital Partners LLP HSBC Global Asset Management Stonepeak Infrastructure Partners I Squared Capital THL Credit Icon Investments Investec Asset Management Venn Partners Kames Capital Westmill Solar Co-operative King Street Capital Management White Oak Global Advisors 6 Lancashire County Pension Fund Annual Report 2015 / 2016 B. Foreword by County Councillor Kevin Ellard, Chair of the Pension Fund Committee As ever it has been a very busy year for arrangement with some of the key staff according to independent experts State Lancashire County Pension Fund. The within the Fund including George Graham Street the best in the Local Government world in which we operate does not stand the Director of the Fund and Mike Jensen Pension Scheme. We also completed two still, and consequently neither can we. the Chief Investment Officer. Both these major infrastructure investments during individuals have played a key part within the year, one acquiring 50% of EDF’s Over the last 12 months the Fund has the Fund and will continue to do so in the Portuguese wind energy business and the concluded the first pooling arrangement partnership arrangements. other acquiring 12.5% of the Madrid Gas within the Local Government Pension Distribution Network where we are partners Scheme in the Local Pensions Partnership. While the creation of the partnership with with EDF, PGGM one of the largest Dutch However, our approach to pooling the London Pension Fund Authority has pension funds and a Chinese sovereign has always been about the holistic been the largest single issue facing the wealth fund. These assets increase the management of the Fund rather than Fund in the last 12 months we have also Fund’s infrastructure investment to 9.4% just creating a bigger pot of investment made sure that we have kept a clear focus of the Fund and provide a long term stable assets and shortly after the end of the on the business of investing the Fund and income generating investment ideally financial year all the staff who carry out the ensuring that pensions are paid accurately suited to help the Fund meet its liabilities investment and administration functions of and on time. going forward. The success of this strategy the fund transferred to the new Partnership. has again been recognised with a number They continue to be based in Preston and In terms of investment the markets have of awards which are detailed elsewhere in continue to focus on making sure that seen a topsy turvy year, however the this annual report. the Lancashire County Pension Fund and Fund’s investment strategy is designed to the other funds that they are now dealing minimise the impact on value of the large The Fund has also continued to expand with are the best run within the Local swings that can be caused by market its local property holdings in Lancashire Government Pension Scheme. As a result movements. This year that strategy has and I am particularly pleased with the of these changes we have a new working paid off and the Fund’s performance was announcement shortly after the end of the Lancashire County Pension Fund Annual Report 2015 / 2016 7 financial year that the Fund will redevelop to put solar panels on the Fund’s various introduction of LGPS 2014 and in the run the Park Hotel building in Preston as a properties, thus reducing the environmental up to the valuation and this has kept the hotel. Where we can, as in this case, impact of the portfolio and providing added Pension Fund Committee as well as the achieve the appropriate return from a local benefits to our tenants. team busy. investment then there is no reason why we should not pursue it and help achieve the On the administration side the team 2016 is valuation year and all expectations wider social benefits for our area that such has continued to deal with the ever are that this valuation will be as challenging investment will bring. increasing number of both members and as the last one in terms of the ability employers and record levels of retirements to balance the various objectives and We have continued to work through our while maintaining very high levels of interests within the process. No doubt this approach to responsible investment performance. Of particular note is the will form a key part of next year’s foreword. looking to be a good owner of good fact that because of the high level of co- assets. This is an area where participating operation between employers and the in the Partnership will allow us to devote Fund in relation to managing and providing more resource to this important area. data we were able to issue 99% of active Reassuringly the various campaigns members’ annual benefit statements against poor corporate behaviour which on time. This was unusual in the Local have been raised with us over the last year Government Pension Scheme and reflects have all been in relation to companies in well on the effective planning undertaken which the Fund has no investment, or are for the introduction of LGPS 2014 and the in relation to broader issues where we are strong relationship between the Fund and already working with other LGPS funds to its employers. A considerable amount influence corporate behaviour. We have of work reviewing various fund policies also completed the investment programme has also been necessary following the County Councillor Kevin Ellard Chair of the Pension Fund Committee 8 Lancashire County Pension Fund Annual Report 2015 / 2016 C. Governance of the Fund the Lancashire County Pension Fund. Lancashire County Pension Fund Investment in Wind Farms, Governance Policy Statement Portugal The Pension Fund Committee has While the Pension Fund is not technically a considered the governance arrangements separate legal entity, it does have its own relating to the administration and strategic specific governance arrangements and management of Fund assets and liabilities controls which sit within Lancashire County in the light of guidance issued by the Council’s overall governance framework. Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) and the requirement Under regulation 55 of the LGPS to complete a Governance Compliance Regulations 2013, all Local Government Statement for all areas of governance of Pension Scheme (LGPS) Funds in England pension fund activities. and Wales are required to publish a Governance Policy Statement setting The Fund’s Governance Compliance out whether the authority delegates its Statement is shown on the following page: functions, or part of its functions to a committee, a sub-committee or an officer of the authority. Comprehensive terms of reference have been
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Actuarial Valuation Report
    HEALTH WEALTH CAREER ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT LANCASHIRE COUNTY PENSION FUND AS AT 31 MARCH 2016 ACTUARIAL VALUATION A S A T 31 MARCH 2016 LANCASHIRE COUNTY PENSION FUND CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1 2. Funding Strategy – Key Elements 2 3. Key results of the funding assessment 3 · Solvency funding position 3 · Primary contribution rate 4 · Correcting the shortfall – secondary contribution rate 4 4. Experience since last valuation 5 · Summary of key inter-valuation experience 5 · Reasons for the change in funding position since the last actuarial valuation 6 5. Cashflows, risks and alternative funding positions 7 · Benefit cashflows 7 · Projected funding position at next actuarial valuation 8 · Material risks faced by the Fund 8 · Sensitivity of funding position to changes in key assumptions 8 · Minimum risk funding position 9 APPENDICES A. Assumptions 11 · How the benefits are valued 11 · Financial assumptions used to calculate the funding target 12 · Demographic assumptions used 12 · Assumptions used to calculate the primary contribution rate 15 B. Summary membership data 17 C. Assets 18 D. Scheme benefits 19 E. Summary of income and expenditure 20 F. Analysis of membership experience 21 G. Rates and adjustments certificate issued in accordance with Regulation 62 22 · Primary contribution rate 22 · Secondary contribution rate 22 · Contribution amounts payable 22 · Further adjustments 22 · Regulation 62(8) 23 H. Schedule to the rates and adjustments certificate dated 31 March 2017 24 I. Glossary 44 MERCER ii ACTUARIAL VALUATION A S A T 31 MARCH 2016 LANCASHIRE COUNTY PENSION FUND 1 INTRODUCTION This report is addressed to the Administering Authority of the Lancashire County Pension Fund (“the Administering Authority”) and is provided to meet the requirements of Regulation 62 of the Local Government Scheme Regulations 2013 (as amended) (“the Regulations”).
    [Show full text]
  • Rossendale Burnley Pendle Playing Pitch
    ROSSENDALE, PENDLE & BURNLEY STRATEGY & ACTION PLAN 2016 - 2026 Integrity, Innovation, Inspiration 1-2 Frecheville Court off Knowsley Street Bury BL9 0UF T 0161 764 7040 F 0161 764 7490 E [email protected] www.kkp.co.uk ROSSENDALE, PENDLE & BURNLEY STRATEGY & ACTION PLAN CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................. 1 PART 1: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 2 PART 2: VISION ............................................................................................................... 9 PART 3: OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................... 10 PART 4: SPORT SPECIFIC ISSUES SCENARIOS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .......... 11 PART 5: STRATEGIC RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................... 22 PART 6: ACTION PLAN ................................................................................................. 37 APPENDIX ONE: STRATEGIC CONTEXT ..................................................................... 77 APPENDIX TWO: FUNDING PLAN ................................................................................ 85 APPENDIX THREE: GLOSSARY ................................................................................... 89 ROSSENDALE, PENDLE & BURNLEY STRATEGY & ACTION PLAN LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AGP Artificial Grass Pitch 3G Third Generation turf (artificial turf) NGB National Governing Body
    [Show full text]
  • Is Your School
    URN DFE School Name Does your Does your Is your Number school school meet our school our attainment eligible? Ever6FSM criteria? 137377 8734603 Abbey College, Ramsey Ncriteria? N N 137083 3835400 Abbey Grange Church of England Academy N N N 131969 8654000 Abbeyfield School N N N 138858 9284069 Abbeyfield School N Y Y 139067 8034113 Abbeywood Community School N Y Y 124449 8604500 Abbot Beyne School N Y Y 102449 3125409 Abbotsfield School N Y Y 136663 3115401 Abbs Cross Academy and Arts College N N N 135582 8946906 Abraham Darby Academy Y Y Y 137210 3594001 Abraham Guest Academy N Y Y 105560 3524271 Abraham Moss Community School Y Y Y 135622 3946905 Academy 360 Y Y Y 139290 8884140 Academy@Worden N Y Y 135649 8886905 Accrington Academy N Y Y 137421 8884630 Accrington St Christopher's Church of England High School N N N 111751 8064136 Acklam Grange School A Specialist Technology College for Maths and Computing N Y Y 100053 2024285 Acland Burghley School Y Y Y 138758 9265405 Acle Academy N N Y 101932 3074035 Acton High School Y Y Y 137446 8945400 Adams' Grammar School N N N 100748 2094600 Addey and Stanhope School Y Y Y 139074 3064042 Addington High School Y Y Y 117512 9194029 Adeyfield School N Y Y 140697 8514320 Admiral Lord Nelson School N N N 136613 3844026 Airedale Academy N Y Y 121691 8154208 Aireville School N N Y 138544 8884403 Albany Academy N N N 137172 9374240 Alcester Academy N N N 136622 9375407 Alcester Grammar School N N N 124819 9354059 Alde Valley School N N Y 134283 3574006 Alder Community High School N Y Y 119722 8884030
    [Show full text]
  • Penwortham Priory Academy Crow Hills Road, Penwortham, Preston, Lancashire PR1 0JE
    School report Penwortham Priory Academy Crow Hills Road, Penwortham, Preston, Lancashire PR1 0JE Inspection dates 17–18 November 2015 Overall effectiveness Requires improvement Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good Summary of key findings for parents and pupils This is an academy that requires improvement Teaching over time has not been consistently Governors have not held school leaders to account good, particularly in science, history and sufficiently robustly, particularly regarding the geography. This is why the proportion of pupils underachievement of disadvantaged pupils. gaining five GCSEs at grades A* to C, including Governors in the past have shown some English and mathematics, dipped in 2015. reluctance to use all the powers at their disposal The achievement of disadvantaged pupils, to eradicate weak teaching or poor leadership of although improving, is still not good enough. subjects. Procedures to hold teachers to account for their The attendance of disadvantaged pupils is performance have lacked rigour. As a result, weak improving but it is still not as good as that of other teaching has not been tackled swiftly enough. pupils. Subject leadership is of variable quality. Subject Teachers’ expectations of what pupils can achieve leaders do not always hold teachers to account for are sometimes too low and therefore some pupils’ achievement sufficiently effectively. lessons are insufficiently challenging. In general, boys’ achievement, although improving Teachers do not always use homework effectively in some subjects, does not always keep pace with to extend pupils’ knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Academies Who Wefre Unsuccessful in ACMF Round 1 2014-15, in the Following Postcode Areas: CA,LA,BD,BB,PR,FY,L,WA,HX,CH,CW,LL
    Academies who wefre unsuccessful in ACMF Round 1 2014-15, in the following postcode areas: CA,LA,BD,BB,PR,FY,L,WA,HX,CH,CW,LL URN Academy Name 101857 The Academy of St Francis of Assisi 135367 Bradford Academy 135877 Birkenhead High School Academy 136094 Trinity Academy, Halifax 136340 Sandbach High School and Sixth Form College 136357 Queen Elizabeth School 136390 Clitheroe Royal Grammar School 136458 Altrincham Grammar School for Boys 136526 The Queen Katherine School 136717 Hodgson Academy 136780 St Anselm's College 136788 The North Halifax Grammar School 136902 Keswick School 136962 Feversham College 137036 Hipperholme and Lightcliffe High School and Sports College 137111 Lostock Hall Academy Trust 137337 Beech Hill Junior and Infant School 137369 Trinity School 137421 Accrington St Christopher's Church of England High School 137449 Holmes Chapel Comprehensive School 137476 Wirral Grammar School for Boys 137512 Belthorn Primary School 137513 Broughton Primary School 137514 Chesterfield High School 137612 Range High School 137641 Clayton-le-Moors All Saints Church of England Primary School 137686 Arnside National CofE School 137768 Tarleton Academy 137973 Montgomery High School - A Language College and Full Service School 138002 Knutsford Academy 138483 Tarporley High School and Sixth Form College 138696 West Derby School 138739 Norbreck Primary School 138742 Kelsall Primary School 138847 Roseacre Primary Academy 138916 St Oswald's CofE Primary Academy 139144 Calday Grange Grammar School 139182 The Crossley Heath School 139343 The Catholic High School, Chester A Specialist Science College 139506 Penketh High School 139539 Stapeley Broad Lane CofE Primary School 139686 Liverpool College 139764 St Thomas More Catholic High School, A Specialist School for Maths & ICT 140076 Harden Primary School 140143 Park School 140306 Penny Bridge CofE School 140326 Halifax High.
    [Show full text]
  • West Lancashire Borough Council Draft Leisure Built Facilities Assessment
    WEST LANCASHIRE BOROUGH COUNCIL DRAFT LEISURE BUILT FACILITIES ASSESSMENT Appendix 2 WEST LANCASHIRE BOROUGH COUNCIL DRAFT LEISURE BUILT FACILITIES ASSESSMENT January 2015 WEST LANCASHIRE BOROUGH COUNCIL DRAFT LEISURE BUILT FACILITIES ASSESSMENT CONTENTS Page Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 Report structure ................................................................................................................ 2 Context ............................................................................................................................. 3 Indoor sports facilities assessment ................................................................................... 9 Sports Halls .................................................................................................................... 14 Swimming pools ............................................................................................................. 24 Health and fitness ........................................................................................................... 33 Consultation.................................................................................................................... 40 Cultural and other provision ............................................................................................ 42 January 2015 WEST LANCASHIRE BOROUGH COUNCIL DRAFT LEISURE BUILT FACILITIES ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION The following provides an assessment
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2020
    NEW ERA ENTERPRISES ANNUAL REPORT JAN 2020 – MARCH 2021 NEW ERA ENTERPRISES (E. LANCS) LTD 62-64 Yorkshire Street Burnley Company no. 3286650 Page | 1 Emotional, Family Health and Engagement Hub Nursery Wellbeing Hub Hub Page | 2 Page | 3 Contents Welcome from our Chairperson Ann Marie ..................................................................... 3 New Era - Inspiring, transforming and connecting communities one life at a time ................ 5 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 5 Emotional Health & Wellbeing ....................................................................................... 7 Case Studies.......................................................................................................................... 9 Achievements .....................................................................................................................10 Thank you to the funders/partners that make this work possible! ...................................12 Family Support ............................................................................................................ 14 Case studies ........................................................................................................................16 Achievements .....................................................................................................................17 Thank you to the funders/partners that make this work possible! ...................................18
    [Show full text]
  • School Place Provision Strategy 2017/18 to 2019/20
    School Place Provision Strategy Appendices 2017/18 to 2019/20 April 2019, Version 1.2 School Place Provision Strategy – 2017/18 to 2019/20 Appendix 1 – Map of Schools in Lancashire For further mapping of schools in Lancashire, please refer to the interactive map. Details of all schools in Lancashire are available via the webpage: http://www.lancashire.gov.uk/schools • 2 • School Place Provision Strategy – 2017/18 to 2019/20 Appendix 2 – Primary Planning Areas Lancaster District – Carnforth Primary Planning Area Carnforth Primary Planning Area is within the district of Lancaster, and is centred around the town of Carnforth. Summary of latest information for the primary planning area is: LCC No School Status Net Capacity NOR Jan 19 Surplus / Shortfall 01019 Over Kellet Wilson's Endowed CoE Voluntary Aided (CE) 126 132 -6 01028 Carnforth Christ Church. CofE. VA Voluntary Aided (CE) 150 102 48 01031 Our Lady of Lourdes Catholic Voluntary Aided (C) 112 89 23 01032 Warton Archbishop Hutton's Voluntary Controlled 177 107 70 01044 Carnforth North Road Community Community 208 163 45 Carnforth Primary Planning Area 773 593 180 * NOR is number on roll for reception year to Year 6 only (excluding nursery aged pupils or early years) 5 Year Forecast Summary for Carnforth Primary Planning Area Future Net Capacity* Forecast NOR in Surplus / Shortfall Primary Planning Area by 2023/24 January 2024 in January 2024 Carnforth Primary Planning Area 773 458 315 * Future Net Capacity takes account of any school expansion works or other schemes will which alter the net capacity within 5 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Education Indicators: 2022 Cycle
    Contextual Data Education Indicators: 2022 Cycle Schools are listed in alphabetical order. You can use CTRL + F/ Level 2: GCSE or equivalent level qualifications Command + F to search for Level 3: A Level or equivalent level qualifications your school or college. Notes: 1. The education indicators are based on a combination of three years' of school performance data, where available, and combined using z-score methodology. For further information on this please follow the link below. 2. 'Yes' in the Level 2 or Level 3 column means that a candidate from this school, studying at this level, meets the criteria for an education indicator. 3. 'No' in the Level 2 or Level 3 column means that a candidate from this school, studying at this level, does not meet the criteria for an education indicator. 4. 'N/A' indicates that there is no reliable data available for this school for this particular level of study. All independent schools are also flagged as N/A due to the lack of reliable data available. 5. Contextual data is only applicable for schools in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland meaning only schools from these countries will appear in this list. If your school does not appear please contact [email protected]. For full information on contextual data and how it is used please refer to our website www.manchester.ac.uk/contextualdata or contact [email protected]. Level 2 Education Level 3 Education School Name Address 1 Address 2 Post Code Indicator Indicator 16-19 Abingdon Wootton Road Abingdon-on-Thames
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I SHLAA Sites Summary Proformas
    Burnley SHLAA: Site Information Form Site Information Density and Yield SHLAA Ref: HEL/009 Site Area (Ha): 11.1 Category: Housing Standard Density: 25 dph - Housing Site Name: Site off Mount Lane, Overtown Initial Source IO Omission site (rural) of Supply: Street: Mount Lane, Overtown Theoretic Yield at Standard 280 Density Location: Overtown Sub Sources Anticpated Yield (m2 or 0 Ward: Cliviger with Worsthorne Ward Extant Planning Permission? No number of dwellings): Parish: Cliviger CP Allocation in Saved Local Plan: Rural Areas Suitability Achievability Attractive Site Location: Open Countryside adjoining named settlement Likely marketability of site: Current Land Use: Agricultural Local Housing/Commercial market/demand: Strong Green Belt: No Established Residential/ Greenfield/Brownfield: Greenfield Commercial Area?: Yes BMV Agricultural Land N/A Likely viability of site: Viable - subject to caveat (boundary Landscape/ Undulating farm land Availability Topography Ownership: Private Visual Visually prominent in long distance views Ownership notes/ Promoted for inclusion in the Local Prominence: evidence of Plan by local resident during Issues landowner and Options consultation Contaminated Land Register: No intentions: Estimated number of Landowners 1 Contamination Adjacent Sites of Potential Concern (mining; textile and Comments: dye works) Tenancies or restrictive covenants: Flood Zone: 1 Comments: Flood Risk Issues: Site considered unsuitable due to scale and location. Flood Map for Surface Water- Predominantly very low annual probability. Small areas of low annual probability. Flood depth less than Uncertainty over site availability. Not listed in GSS 2015 but 300mm. was identified as site for potential new allotments (Burnley Allotment Review 2011). Heritage Asset Comment: South of site within 100m of Grade II Listed LCC highways: Access preferred off Burnley Road due to Building.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter 21
    Newsletter No 21 th 11 February 2019 Dear Parents, I am sure you read or heard last week’s news from the UK Chief Medical Officer on ‘Screen-based activities and young people’s mental health and psychosocial wellbeing’. Rather than just reading the BBC/newspaper summary, I decided to read the full report. It is not an impenetrable document and actually makes for interesting reading. Without wishing to be too selective, Section 4 ‘Taking a precautionary approach’ provides a sense of perspective. It highlights that, “Even though no causal effect is evident from existing research between screen-based activities, or the amount of time spent using screens, and any particular negative effect, it does not mean that there is no effect. It is still wise to take a precautionary approach. This needs to be balanced, however, against the potential benefits that children and young people can derive from their screen-based activities.” However, Section 7 ‘Advice for parents and carers’ contains several pieces of eminently good advice and it concludes with the following tabular information. I hope you find it helpful. In response to several enquiries, we shall be distributing copies of the individual Year 11 revision guides at a special ‘How to help your child revise’ presentation on Thursday 14 March. This will be at the same time, on the same night as the Year 11 Parents’ Evening, thereby saving you coming on the scheduled 4 April event. I will deliver the 20 minute revision session several times on the 14 March, thereby allowing you to attend two events on the same evening.
    [Show full text]
  • Lancashire County Pension Fund
    Lancashire County Pension Fund 31 March 2020 welcome to brighter Actuarial Valuation as at 31 March 2019 Lancashire County Pension Fund Contents 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Funding Strategy – Key Elements .................................................................................................................. 4 3. Key results of the funding assessment ......................................................................................................... 6 • Solvency funding position ....................................................................................................................... 6 • Primary Contribution Rate ....................................................................................................................... 7 • Correcting the imbalance – Secondary Contribution Rate ................................................................ 8 • The McCloud Judgment ............................................................................................................................ 8 4. Experience since last valuation ...................................................................................................................... 9 • Summary of key inter-valuation experience ........................................................................................ 9 • Reasons for the change in funding position since the last actuarial valuation
    [Show full text]