Burnley SHLAA: Site Information Form Site Information Density and Yield SHLAA Ref: HEL/009 Site Area (Ha): 11.1 Category: Housing Standard Density: 25 dph - Housing Site Name: Site off Mount Lane, Overtown Initial Source IO Omission site (rural) of Supply: Street: Mount Lane, Overtown Theoretic Yield at Standard 280 Density Location: Overtown Sub Sources Anticpated Yield (m2 or 0 Ward: Cliviger with Worsthorne Ward Extant Planning Permission? No number of dwellings): Parish: Cliviger CP Allocation in Saved Local Plan: Rural Areas Suitability Achievability Attractive Site Location: Open Countryside adjoining named settlement Likely marketability of site: Current Land Use: Agricultural Local Housing/Commercial market/demand: Strong Green Belt: No Established Residential/ Greenfield/Brownfield: Greenfield Commercial Area?: Yes BMV Agricultural Land N/A Likely viability of site: Viable - subject to caveat (boundary Landscape/ Undulating farm land Availability Topography Ownership: Private Visual Visually prominent in long distance views Ownership notes/ Promoted for inclusion in the Local Prominence: evidence of Plan by local resident during Issues landowner and Options consultation Contaminated Land Register: No intentions: Estimated number of Landowners 1 Contamination Adjacent Sites of Potential Concern (mining; textile and Comments: dye works) Tenancies or restrictive covenants: Flood Zone: 1 Comments: Flood Risk Issues: Site considered unsuitable due to scale and location. Flood Map for Surface Water- Predominantly very low annual probability. Small areas of low annual probability. Flood depth less than Uncertainty over site availability. Not listed in GSS 2015 but 300mm. was identified as site for potential new allotments (Burnley Allotment Review 2011). Heritage Asset Comment: South of site within 100m of Grade II Listed LCC highways: Access preferred off Burnley Road due to Building. Any development would need to concerns that access onto Mount Lane would increase Listed Building assess impact. movements at Park road / Red Lees Road junctions. Conservation Area Mitigation measures dependant on size of devt and traffic generation. Traffic Speed on Burnley Road has previously Ancient Monument been an issue. Measures to improve sustainability (walking, Local List cycling, public transport) would be sought. TPO on site?: No Within or adj to an SSSI, SAC, SPA, NNR?: No Within or adj to a Biological Heritage Site, LNR: BHS Nature Conservation Comment BHS present (Low Side Banking). Ecological Network (Grassland) Conclusion including core & stepping stone habitat. Include/Exclude: Include Availability Conclusion: Not Available Suitability Conclusion: Not Suitable Achievability Conclusion: Achievable 400m of a bus stop? Yes Developable: No 800m of a train station? No 30 minutes public transport time of key borough Yes Local Plan services? In Issues and Options LP: No 8km cycling distance of key borough services? Yes In Preferred Options LP: No 400m of a defined on or off-road cycle route: Yes In Proposed Submission LP: No Within 1200m of a primary school, GP, shop, No community facility? Developable but less than 0.4 ha: N/A Burnley SHLAA: Site Information Form Site Information Density and Yield SHLAA Ref: HEL/010 Site Area (Ha): 3.45 Category: Housing Standard Density: 30 dph - Housing Site Name: Lanehead Quarry Initial Source Desktop of Supply: Street: Islington Close Theoretic Yield at Standard 104 Density Location: Burnley Sub Sources BBC Anticpated Yield (m2 or 0 Ward: Lanehead Extant Planning Permission? No number of dwellings): Parish: Allocation in Saved Local Plan: Part of site Protected Open Space - Enclosed Floo Suitability Achievability Significant constraints likely to affect marketability and Site Location: Within urban boundary Likely marketability of site: developable area Current Land Use: Open Space Local Housing/Commercial market/demand: Fair Green Belt: No Established Residential/ Greenfield/Brownfield: Mainly Greenfield Commercial Area?: Yes BMV Agricultural Land N/A Likely viability of site: Unviable Landscape/ Higher northern part of site includes a playground, play Availability Topography centre a grassed area and pitches. Southern part includes former quarry - partly treed and a car park. Ownership: Council (BBC) Visual Car park at the bottom of the site well screened, lying well Ownership notes/ The Council is actively looking at its Prominence: below the levels of houses to the west and north east of evidence of landholdings to assess development the site Cottages/restaurant on Marsden Lane overlook landowner potential in particular to stimulate the Contaminated Land Register: Site of Potential Concern intentions: housing market Estimated number of Landowners 1 Contamination Quarrying Comments: Tenancies or restrictive covenants: Flood Zone: 1 Comments: Flood Risk Issues: Site contains a play area, play centre and playground, car Flood Map for Surface Water - areas of low, medium and high annual parking area and disused quarry. Public ROWs cross site. probability in southern part of site. Part of site within CA. EA: Ref K1/12/063: The site was infilled before the controls imposed under the Control of Pollution Act. Not considered Heritage Asset Comment: A significant part of the site (south) lies to be filled. Fly-tipped only. within the Jib Hill Conservation Area. Listed Building Development should ensure that the LCC highways: Access off Marsden Road would be character and appearance of the CA is Conservation Area substandard. Access should be taken off Underley Street. preserved or enhanced.Sites that introduce Some junction improvements would be required in Ancient Monument clear harm to the significance of the anticipation of the increased traffic precise nature would Conservation Area, with little prospect of Local List depend on the size of the development mitigation should be considered Measures to improve sustainability (walking, cycling, public TPO on site?: No inappropriate. transport) would be sought. Within or adj to an SSSI, SAC, SPA, NNR?: No Within or adj to a Biological Heritage Site, LNR: No Nature Conservation Comment Potential bat habitat. Conclusion Include/Exclude: Include Availability Conclusion: Available Suitability Conclusion: Not Suitable Achievability Conclusion: Not Achievable 400m of a bus stop? Yes Developable: No 800m of a train station? No 30 minutes public transport time of key borough Yes Local Plan services? In Issues and Options LP: No 8km cycling distance of key borough services? Yes In Preferred Options LP: No 400m of a defined on or off-road cycle route: Yes In Proposed Submission LP: No Within 1200m of a primary school, GP, shop, Yes Developable but less than 0.4 ha: community facility? N/A Burnley SHLAA: Site Information Form Site Information Density and Yield SHLAA Ref: HEL/012 Site Area (Ha): 0.54 Category: Housing Standard Density: 30 dph - Housing Site Name: Bergen Street Initial Source Desktop of Supply: Street: Bergen Street Theoretic Yield at Standard 16 Density Location: Burnley Sub Sources UCS Anticpated Yield (m2 or 16 Ward: Rosegrove with Lowerhouse Extant Planning Permission? No number of dwellings): Parish: Allocation in Saved Local Plan: Suitability Achievability Potentially attractive to a small/medium local builder Site Location: Within urban boundary Likely marketability of site: Current Land Use: Residential gardens/Allotments Local Housing/Commercial market/demand: Fair Green Belt: No Established Residential/ Greenfield/Brownfield: Greenfield Commercial Area?: Yes BMV Agricultural Land N/A Likely viability of site: Viable Landscape/ Triangular site to rear of terraced properties, currently Availability Topography used as allotments / gardens. Gradient is flat. Ownership: Private Visual All three sides of this triangular site are overlooked by Ownership notes/ Site considered for residential Prominence: properties. evidence of development throughthe UCS landowner prepared in 1998 and 2004 Contaminated Land Register: No intentions: Estimated number of Landowners 1 Contamination None Comments: Tenancies or restrictive covenants: Flood Zone: 1 Comments: Flood Risk Issues: LCC highways: Access points limited and would be close to Flood Map for Surface Water - Very low annual probability. Rosegrove Signals, would have concerns that the turning manoeuvres would lead to additional delays/congestion in the vicinity of the junction. Would not consider the site suitable for development. Heritage Asset Comment: Vehicular access could be provided. Listed Building No recent indication of availability and site in use as Conservation Area residential gardens/allotments providing an amenity for residents in a high density area of terraced housing Ancient Monument without gardens. Local List TPO on site?: No Within or adj to an SSSI, SAC, SPA, NNR?: No Within or adj to a Biological Heritage Site, LNR: No Nature Conservation Comment Conclusion Include/Exclude: Include Availability Conclusion: Not Available Suitability Conclusion: Suitable Achievability Conclusion: Achievable 400m of a bus stop? Yes Developable: No 800m of a train station? Yes 30 minutes public transport time of key borough Yes Local Plan services? In Issues and Options LP: No 8km cycling distance of key borough services? Yes In Preferred Options LP: No 400m of a defined on or off-road cycle route: Yes In Proposed Submission LP: No Within 1200m of a primary school, GP, shop, Yes Developable but less than 0.4 ha: community facility? N/A Burnley SHLAA: Site Information Form Site Information