Chemical and Physical Properties of Soils in Mt. Apo and Mt. Hamiguitan, Mindanao, the Philippines
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Harmful Industrial Activities Other Natural World Heritage Sites
MAP HARMFUL INDUSTRIAL 169 79 170 191 ACTIVITIES 171 100 87 151 45 43 168 WWF DEFINES HARMFUL 44 INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITIES AS: 207 172 204 80 Operations that cause major 167 38 39 81 94 23 203 disturbances or changes to the 46 93 166 141 42 40 94 94 122 218 193192 99 character of marine or terrestrial 165 41 115 114 164 environments. Such activities are of 221 179 119 71 35 173 91 88 142 34 concern due to their potential to involve 220 197 96 62 118 186 95 194 large impacts on the attributes of 217 112 199 222 184 200 214 215 198 113 56 outstanding universal value and other 52 162 101 51 163 natural, economic and cultural values. 136 212 105 58 54 120 187 85 121 53 61 The impacts of these activities are 185 144 50 55 117 140 103 145 60 57 219 137 213 1 104102 often long-term or permanent. 49 59 They can also be of concern due 72 22 139 106 224 138 73 134 48 216 135 149 226 to their impacts on the sustainability 24 116 97 82 175 196 225 of local livelihoods, and/or because 98 133 195 174 176 86 they put at risk the health, safety or 150 227 65 67 160 154 68 47 107 well-being of communities. Harmful 153 63 70 188 161 152 132 159 66 64 223 69 189 industrial activities are often, but not 190 36 74 37 124 131 exclusively, conducted by multinational 76 92 78 125 83 84 77 201202 123 enterprises and their subsidiaries. -
Edgar Alexander Mearns Papers, Circa 1871-1916, 1934 and Undated
Edgar Alexander Mearns Papers, circa 1871-1916, 1934 and undated Finding aid prepared by Smithsonian Institution Archives Smithsonian Institution Archives Washington, D.C. Contact us at [email protected] Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Historical Note.................................................................................................................. 1 Descriptive Entry.............................................................................................................. 2 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 2 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 3 Series 1: General Correspondence, 1886-1909, and undated................................. 3 Series 2: Biographical Material, 1879, 1885-1900, 1934......................................... 4 Series 3: Field Notes, Research Notes, Specimen Lists, Manuscripts, and Reprints, 1871-1911, and undated.......................................................................................... 5 Series 4: United States-Mexican International Boundary Survey, 1892-1894. Correspondence, Photographs, Drawings, and Research Data on Mammals, circa 1891-1907................................................................................................................ -
Los Cien Montes Más Prominentes Del Planeta D
LOS CIEN MONTES MÁS PROMINENTES DEL PLANETA D. Metzler, E. Jurgalski, J. de Ferranti, A. Maizlish Nº Nombre Alt. Prom. Situación Lat. Long. Collado de referencia Alt. Lat. Long. 1 MOUNT EVEREST 8848 8848 Nepal/Tibet (China) 27°59'18" 86°55'27" 0 2 ACONCAGUA 6962 6962 Argentina -32°39'12" -70°00'39" 0 3 DENALI / MOUNT McKINLEY 6194 6144 Alaska (USA) 63°04'12" -151°00'15" SSW of Rivas (Nicaragua) 50 11°23'03" -85°51'11" 4 KILIMANJARO (KIBO) 5895 5885 Tanzania -3°04'33" 37°21'06" near Suez Canal 10 30°33'21" 32°07'04" 5 COLON/BOLIVAR * 5775 5584 Colombia 10°50'21" -73°41'09" local 191 10°43'51" -72°57'37" 6 MOUNT LOGAN 5959 5250 Yukon (Canada) 60°34'00" -140°24’14“ Mentasta Pass 709 62°55'19" -143°40’08“ 7 PICO DE ORIZABA / CITLALTÉPETL 5636 4922 Mexico 19°01'48" -97°16'15" Champagne Pass 714 60°47'26" -136°25'15" 8 VINSON MASSIF 4892 4892 Antarctica -78°31’32“ -85°37’02“ 0 New Guinea (Indonesia, Irian 9 PUNCAK JAYA / CARSTENSZ PYRAMID 4884 4884 -4°03'48" 137°11'09" 0 Jaya) 10 EL'BRUS 5642 4741 Russia 43°21'12" 42°26'21" West Pakistan 901 26°33'39" 63°39'17" 11 MONT BLANC 4808 4695 France 45°49'57" 06°51'52" near Ozero Kubenskoye 113 60°42'12" c.37°07'46" 12 DAMAVAND 5610 4667 Iran 35°57'18" 52°06'36" South of Kaukasus 943 42°01'27" 43°29'54" 13 KLYUCHEVSKAYA 4750 4649 Kamchatka (Russia) 56°03'15" 160°38'27" 101 60°23'27" 163°53'09" 14 NANGA PARBAT 8125 4608 Pakistan 35°14'21" 74°35'27" Zoji La 3517 34°16'39" 75°28'16" 15 MAUNA KEA 4205 4205 Hawaii (USA) 19°49'14" -155°28’05“ 0 16 JENGISH CHOKUSU 7435 4144 Kyrghysztan/China 42°02'15" 80°07'30" -
A Global Overview of Protected Areas on the World Heritage List of Particular Importance for Biodiversity
A GLOBAL OVERVIEW OF PROTECTED AREAS ON THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST OF PARTICULAR IMPORTANCE FOR BIODIVERSITY A contribution to the Global Theme Study of World Heritage Natural Sites Text and Tables compiled by Gemma Smith and Janina Jakubowska Maps compiled by Ian May UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre Cambridge, UK November 2000 Disclaimer: The contents of this report and associated maps do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP-WCMC or contributory organisations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP-WCMC or contributory organisations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION 1.0 OVERVIEW......................................................................................................................................................1 2.0 ISSUES TO CONSIDER....................................................................................................................................1 3.0 WHAT IS BIODIVERSITY?..............................................................................................................................2 4.0 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY......................................................................................................................3 5.0 CURRENT WORLD HERITAGE SITES............................................................................................................4 -
Indigenous Knowledge Dissemination-Still Not There
Indigenous Knowledge Dissemination‐Still Not There Ibrahim Ahmad BAJUNID INTI Laureate University Page | 0 Abstract We have robust partial knowledge about what we know and in this strength, we are proud and arrogant about what we do. However, we are ignorant of alternatives and complementary knowledge, education and training. We know little of alternative or complementary medicine‐Chinese traditional medicine, Ayurveda and Islamic traditional medicine. We know little of the arts of self‐defence and the martial masters, and other training forms beyond WestPoint and Sandhurst. It is possible that people from the dominant knowledge mainstream will go through their lives without “having had to operate outside of the dominant knowledge systems or shift the paradigm through which a [person] views the world in order to make sense of things.” Indigenous Knowledge is not about the aborigines as subjects but it is about man’s knowledge from another perspective, at the fringe of, or aside of dominant knowledge systems. It is about the use of the inherited and evolving knowledge corpuses. To understand the importance of the knowledge of “the other” we have to understand their ways of knowing, of happying, of facing the trials and tribulations of change, often disruptive to their ecology. In some ways, in popular literature regarding the natives, (or in some other art forms), actors are made to articulate some perspectives and wisdom of native, marginalized and alienated people. The disconnect in contemporary civilization, especially, in educational enterprises is not about merely the obsolescence of their tools or thoughts, but about the embedded strengths of the native potentials and philosophies, interpretations and meaning‐findings in their lives. -
Birds from Canlaon Volcano in the Highlands of Negros Island in the Philippines
July, 1956 283 BIRDS FROM CANLAON VOLCANO IN THE HIGHLANDS OF NEGROS ISLAND IN THE PHILIPPINES By S. DILLON RIPLEY and D. S. RABOR Several ornithological collectors have worked on Negros Island, which is the fourth largest of the 7090 islands that form the Philippine Archipelago. However, John White- head, the famous English naturalist, was the only person who collected extensively in the highlands of this island. Whitehead worked on the slopes of Canlaon Volcano, in the north-central section in March and April, 1896. Since that time no other collector has visited this volcano until April and May, 1953, when one of us, Rabor, collected in prac- tically the same places in which Whitehead worked. This study of the birds of the high- lands of Negros Island was carried on chiefly through the aid of the Peabody Museum of Natural History of Yale University. TOPOGRAPHY AND GEOLOGY OF THE COLLECTING LOCALITIES The principal central mountain chain traverses Negros Island from its northeast corner south to the southern end. This range lies closer to the east side than to the west and forms a divide throughout the extent of the island. A dormant volcano, Canlaon, with an elevation of about 8200 feet, is the most prominent peak in the north-central section of the mountain chain, and it is easily the dominant landmark of the western coastal plain. Many of the mountains of Negros Island are volcanic (Smith, 1924). The north- western region, where most of the sugar cane is grown, is mainly of volcanic origin, whereas the southeastern portion consists of folded and faulted plutonic rocks, slates, and jaspers, probably of Mesozoic Age, and some Tertiary extrusives, all more or less dissected and worn down by erosion. -
Trust Mountain Climb Challenge
Reaching together! Top of the World Challenge! We can all reach great heights both individually and go further still together. How many of the world’s 100 tallest mountains can we climb as one Trust community? During these challenging times it’s important that we all look after our mental wellbeing and walking is a great way to do this, alongside also improving our physical health. We are going to use this challenge to fundraise for the mental health charity MIND. We’re encouraging children to walk locally with their parents (within the restrictions of Please follow this link to our Just Giving page. lockdown) and measure how far they walk. They can then colour or tick off any mountain of their choice below and share this with their teacher via Seesaw. Everest Each child could walk far enough to climb several mountains over 8 848m the next few weeks. What could a class, a Key Stage K2 - 8611m or a school achieve together? Kangchenjunga - 8586m All school and other Trust staff have the Nanga Parbat 8125m Manaslu 8163m Dhaulagiri I 8167m opportunity to join in too. How high can Batura Sar 7795m Nanda Devi 7816m Annapurna 8091m Kongur Shan 7649m Tirich Mir 7708m Namcha Barwa 7782m everyone in the Trust go? Pik Komm’zma 7495m Minya Konka 7556m Kangkar Punzum 7570m There’s no limit to what we Cerro Aconcagua 6962m Gyalha Peri 7294m Pik Pobeda 7439m can achieve together! Xuelian Feng 6627m Mercedario 6720m Ojos del Salado 6893m Kilimanjaro 5895m Mt Logan 5959m Denali 6194m Chimborazo 6267m Yulong Xueshan 5596m Damavand 5610m Citlaltepetl 5636m -
The Conservation Status of Biological Resources in the Philippines
: -.^,rhr:"-i-3'^^=£#?^-j^.r-^a^ Sj2 r:iw0,">::^^'^ \^^' Cfl|*ti-»;;^ THE CONSERVATION STATUS OF BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES IN THE PHILIPPINES A RRF'OHT V^Y THK lUCN CONSKRVATION MONITORING CENT:-!E PfcparGd by Roger Cox for the lnLf5rnaLion?.l InsLituLo Cor Knvironment and Development (IIED) February 1988 / fgrMsa^jnt-^'-agyga-- •r-r- ;.«-'> t ^-' isr* 1*.- i^^s. , r^^, ^».|;; ^b-^ ^.*%-^ *i,r^-v . iinnc [ '»/' C'A'. aSM!': Vi - '«.;s^ ; a-* f%h '3;riti7;.:- n'^'ji K ;ii;!'r ' <s:ii.uiy.. viii. K A xo.^ jf^'r;.' 3 10 ciJuJi i\ Ji\{ :::) Jnj:kf- .i. n ( im'.i) •V'lt r'v - -V.-^f~^?fl LP-ife- f^^ s.:.... --11 -^M.jj^^^ riB CC./Sfc^RvAriON .<*TC.rj^. OF EI3U:i' "I.VJ, JbO'TSOURCES ^^a THE PHILIPPlVl'fC ;j^...^..-r'^^ I ilRPOHT BY THK ILCJJ CGJJSIiKVA'ilCN M0N:.V:..):;1NG CKNT ^ Pc'jpas-fjr' ')y Roto* C(/X for the TiKD). {'obruary 1988 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from UNEP-WCIVIC, Cambridge http://www.archive.org/details/conservationstat88coxr . 7' CONTENTS List of Figures, Appendices and Tables iii Summary iy Acknowledgements vii 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Objectives 3 2 METHODS 4 3. FLORA, VEGETATION AND FOREST COVER 3.1 Description of the natural vegetation 4 3.1.1 The forests 4 3.1.2 Other vegetation types 7 3 2 Conservation status of the Philippine flora 8 3.2.1 Introduction 8 3.2.2 Causes of habitat destruction 9 3.2.3 Threatened plant species 11 3. 2. A Centres of plant diversity and endemism 12 4 COASTAL AND MARINE ECOSYSTEMS 4.1 Background 17 4.2 Mangroves 18 4.3 Coral reefs 19 4.4 Seagrass beds 22 5. -
Harmful Industrial Activities Other Natural World Heritage Sites
MAP HARMFUL INDUSTRIAL 169 79 170 191 ACTIVITIES 171 100 87 151 45 43 168 WWF DEFINES HARMFUL 44 INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITIES AS: 207 172 204 80 Operations that cause major 167 38 39 81 94 23 203 disturbances or changes to the 46 93 166 141 42 40 94 94 122 218 193192 99 character of marine or terrestrial 165 41 115 114 164 environments. Such activities are of 221 179 119 230 71 35 173 91 88 142 34 concern due to their potential to involve 220 231 197 96 62 118 186 95 194 large impacts on the attributes of 217 112 199 222 184 200 214 215 198 113 56 outstanding universal value and other 52 162 101 51 163 natural, economic and cultural values. 136 212 105 58 54 120 187 85 121 53 61 The impacts of these activities are 185 144 50 55 117 140 103 145 60 57 219 137 213 1 104102 often long-term or permanent. 49 59 They can also be of concern due 72 22 139 106 224 138 73 134 48 216 135 149 226 to their impacts on the sustainability 24 116 97 82 175 196 225 of local livelihoods, and/or because 98 133 195 174 176 86 they put at risk the health, safety or 150 227 65 67 160 154 68 47 107 well-being of communities. Harmful 153 63 70 188 161 152 132 159 66 64 223 69 189 industrial activities are often, but not 190 36 74 37 124 131 exclusively, conducted by multinational 76 92 78 125 83 84 77 201202 123 enterprises and their subsidiaries. -
Conservation of Protected Areas in Thailand: the Case of Khao Yai National Park Pakkawadee Panusittikorn and Tony Prato 66
The George Wright Society Board of Directors ROBERTJ. KRUMENAKER • President Paoli, Pennsylvania NEILW. P. MUNRO • Vice President Halifax, Nova Scotia PETER BRINKLEY • Treasurer New York, New York LAURA E. SOULLIERE • Secretary Natchez, Louisiana MARIE BERTILLION COLLINS • Piedmont, California DENNIS B. FENN • Reston, Virginia GARY LARSON • Corvattis, Oregon DAVIDJ. PARSONS • Missoula, Montana DWIGHTT. PlTCAITHLEY • Washington, D.C. RICHARD B. SMITH • Placitas, New Mexico Executive Office P. 0. Box 65, Hancock, Michigan 49930-0065 USA -a 1-906-487-9722; fax 1-906-487-9405 [email protected] • http://www.georgewright.org David Harmon • Executive Director Robert M. Linn • Membership Coordinator The George Wright Society is a member of US/ICOMOS (International Council on Monuments and Sites—U.S. Committee), IUCN—The World Conservation Union, and The Natural Resources Council of America © 2001 The George Wright Society, Inc. All rights reserved. (No copyright is claimed for previously published material reprinted herein.) ISSN 0732-4715 Editorial guidelines may be found on the inside back cover. Text paper is made of 10% Postconsumer fibers. Printed by Book Concern Printers, Hancock, Michigan THE GEORGE WRIGHT FORUM Volume 18 ❖ 2001 ❖ Number 2 Society News, Notes & Mail 2 Box Sixty-Five • Thoughts on the Arctic Refuge’s Future William E. Brown 4 The Human Element Roger Kennedy 8 The U.S. National Amphibian Research and Monitoring Initiative and the Role of Protected Areas Russell J. Hall and Catherine A. Langtimm 14 Searching for Biological Specimens from Midwestern Parks: Pitfalls and Solutions James P. Bennett 26 PROTECTED AREAS IN EAST ASIA: AN OVERVIEW AND TWO CASE STUDIES Twenty-first Century Strategies for Protected Areas in East Asia David Sheppard 40 Establishing Protected Areas in the Philippines: Emerging Trends, Challenges, and Prospects Rafael G. -
Estimation of Above-Ground Biomass in Mt. Apo Natural Park in the Southern Philippines Using Terrestrial Lidar System
RESEARCH ARTICLE Estimation of Above-ground Biomass in Mt. Apo Natural Park in the Southern Philippines Using Terrestrial LiDAR System ٠ Robert A. Washington-Allen ٠ Ligaya C. Rubas-Leal J. Richard Conner ٠ Sorin C. Popescu Texas A&M University, UNITED STATES Abstract Extraction of plot-level field measurements entails a rigid and time-consuming task. Fine resolution remote sensing technology offers an objective and consistent method for estimation of forest vertical structures. We explored the development of algorithms for estimating above-ground biomass (AGB) at the plot level using terrestrial LiDAR system (TLS). This research follows IPCC Tier 2 approach, by combining field and remote sensing data, in estimating forest carbon stocks. Permanent plots (30 × 30 m diameter) were established inside Mt. Apo Natural Park. Forest inventory was conducted in July 2013, recording tree heights and stem diameters for all hardwood species with diameter at breast height (DBH) ≥ 5 cm in three management zones: multiple use, strict protection, and restoration. Quadratic mean stem diameter was employed for large DBH intervals for deriving midpoint biomass. Three tropical allometric equations were used to derive referenced biomass values. Regressions results showed satisfactory modeling fit in relating plot-level AGB to DBH class size: 80%–89%. Mean tree heights from field and TLS data were related showing R2 = 88%. TLS variables derived include percentile heights and normalized height bins at 5-m intervals. The generalized linear model is a more robust model for percentile heights, while stepwise regression showed a better regression performance for normalized height bins. Strict protection zone contained the highest carbon storage. -
ASEAN and the Environment Sompong Sucharitkul Golden Gate University School of Law, [email protected]
Golden Gate University School of Law GGU Law Digital Commons Publications Faculty Scholarship 1993 ASEAN and the Environment Sompong Sucharitkul Golden Gate University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/pubs Part of the Environmental Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation 3 Asian Yearbook of Int'l. L. (1993) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at GGU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications by an authorized administrator of GGU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Asian Yearbook of International Law published under the auspices of the Foundation for the Development of International Law in Asia (DILA) General Editors Ko Swan Sik- M.C.W. Pinto - J.J.C. Syatauw VOLUME 3 1993 ASEAN AND THE ENVIRONMENT By SOMPONG SUCHARITKUL ASEAN AND THE ENVIRONlVIENT by SOMPONG SUCHARITKUL ASEAN AND THE ENVIRONMENT I. ASEAN AWARENESS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT This is part of a series of studies devoted to the Association of South-East Asian Nations (ASEAN), a dynamic regional organization for social, cultural and economic cooperation. 1 The ASEAN Society currently comprises six regional members : Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, the Philippines and since January 7, 1984, Brunei Darussalam. 2 ASEAN tends to grow in membership and closer association with regional neighbors 3 and to expand in further intensified cooperation with its non-ASEAN, non-regional partners. 4 The object of this study is to examine some of ASEAN collective endeavors in the implementation of environmental protection within the ASEAN region and beyond.