DOCSLIB.ORG

Harmful Industrial Activities Other Natural World Heritage Sites

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Harmful Industrial Activities Other Natural World Heritage Sites MAP HARMFUL INDUSTRIAL 169 79 170 191 ACTIVITIES 171 100 87 151 45 43 168 WWF DEFINES HARMFUL 44 INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITIES AS: 207 172 204 80 Operations that cause major 167 38 39 81 94 23 203 disturbances or changes to the 46 93 166 141 42 40 94 94 122 218 193192 99 character of marine or terrestrial 165 41 115 114 164 environments. Such activities are of 221 179 119 230 71 35 173 91 88 142 34 concern due to their potential to involve 220 231 197 96 62 118 186 95 194 large impacts on the attributes of 217 112 199 222 184 200 214 215 198 113 56 outstanding universal value and other 52 162 101 51 163 natural, economic and cultural values. 136 212 105 58 54 120 187 85 121 53 61 The impacts of these activities are 185 144 50 55 117 140 103 145 60 57 219 137 213 1 104102 often long-term or permanent. 49 59 They can also be of concern due 72 22 139 106 224 138 73 134 48 216 135 149 226 to their impacts on the sustainability 24 116 97 82 175 196 225 of local livelihoods, and/or because 98 133 195 174 176 86 they put at risk the health, safety or 150 227 65 67 160 154 68 47 107 well-being of communities. Harmful 153 63 70 188 161 152 132 159 66 64 223 69 189 industrial activities are often, but not 190 36 74 37 124 131 exclusively, conducted by multinational 76 92 78 125 83 84 77 201202 123 enterprises and their subsidiaries. 29 75 110 28 211 208 126 209 109 Extractive operations, such as mining, 158 178 111 156 210 177 108 quarrying, and oil and gas exploitation, 157 180 155 30 12 and their related infrastructure, are 25 128 31 229 130 20 228 currently recognized as one class 33 129 16 9 26 6 89 of activity that is covered by this 206 90 27 143 15 definition. Other activities are also 32 19 7 2 183 17 to be considered, including dams, 182 8 3 127 commercial ports, linear infrastructure 13 (e.g. pipelines, roads and railroads), 181 21 10 industrial farming and forestry, and 6 205 other types of over-exploitation. 148 5 18 MAP OF NATURAL 147 4 AND MIXED WORLD 11 146 HERITAGE SITES See over for list of sites. 14 KEY Site threatened by harmful industrial activities Other natural World Heritage sites Protecting People Through Nature 52 Table 2: List of natural and mixed World Heritage sites ) ) • • ) ) • • Sites marked * are currently on the List of World Heritage in Danger. (M) indicates mixed (natural/cultural) World Heritage sites Sites marked * are currently on the List of World Heritage in Danger. (M) indicates mixed (natural/cultural) World Heritage sites No Site Country No Site Country Other Natural World Heritage sites ( Natural World Heritage sites threatened by harmful industrial activities ( Other Natural World Heritage sites ( Natural World Heritage sites threatened by harmful industrial activities ( Sichuan Giant Panda Sanctuaries - Wolong, Mt Siguniang 1 Tassili n'Ajjer Algeria • 58 China and Jiajin Mountains • 2 Iguazu National Park Argentina • 59 South China Karst China 3 Ischigualasto / Talampaya Natural Parks Argentina • • 60 Three Parallel Rivers of Yunnan Protected Areas China 4 Los Glaciares National Park Argentina • • 61 Wulingyuan Scenic and Historic Interest Area China 5 Península Valdés Argentina • • 62 Xinjiang Tianshan China 6 Australian Fossil Mammal Sites (Riversleigh / Naracoorte) Australia • • 63 Los Katíos National Park Colombia 7 Fraser Island Australia • • 64 Malpelo Fauna and Flora Sanctuary Colombia 8 Gondwana Rainforests of Australia Australia • • 65 Area de Conservación Guanacaste Costa Rica 9 Great Barrier Reef Australia • • 66 Cocos Island National Park Costa Rica 10 Greater Blue Mountains Area Australia • • 67 Talamanca Range-La Amistad Reserves / La Amistad National Park Costa Rica, Panama 11 Heard and McDonald Islands Australia • • 68 Comoé National Park * Côte d'Ivoire 12 Kakadu National Park (M) Australia • • 69 Taï National Park Côte d'Ivoire 13 Lord Howe Island Group Australia • • 70 Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve * Côte d'Ivoire, Guinea 14 Macquarie Island Australia • • 71 Plitvice Lakes National Park Croatia 15 Ningaloo Coast Australia • • 72 Alejandro de Humboldt National Park Cuba 16 Purnululu National Park Australia • • 73 Desembarco del Granma National Park Cuba 17 Shark Bay, Western Australia Australia • • 74 Garamba National Park * Democratic Republic of the Congo 18 Tasmanian Wilderness (M) Australia • • 75 Kahuzi-Biega National Park * Democratic Republic of the Congo 19 Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park (M) Australia • • 76 Okapi Wildlife Reserve * Democratic Republic of the Congo 20 Wet Tropics of Queensland Australia • • 77 Salonga National Park * Democratic Republic of the Congo 21 Willandra Lakes Region (M) Australia • • 78 Virunga National Park * Democratic Republic of the Congo 22 The Sundarbans Bangladesh • • 79 Ilulissat Icefjord Denmark 23 Białowieża Forest Belarus, Poland • • 80 Stevns Klint Denmark 24 Belize Barrier Reef Reserve System * Belize • • 81 Wadden Sea Denmark, Germany, Netherlands 25 Noel Kempff Mercado National Park Bolivia • • 82 Morne Trois Pitons National Park Dominica 26 Okavango Delta Botswana • • 83 Galápagos Islands Ecuador 27 Atlantic Forest South-East Reserves Brazil • • 84 Sangay National Park Ecuador Brazilian Atlantic Islands: Fernando de Noronha and Atol das • 28 Brazil Rocas Reserves • 85 Wadi Al-Hitan (Whale Valley) Egypt • 29 Central Amazon Conservation Complex Brazil • 86 Simien National Park * Ethiopia • Cerrado Protected Areas: Chapada dos Veadeiros and Emas 87 High Coast / Kvarken Archipelago Finland, Sweden • 30 Brazil • National Parks 88 Gulf of Porto: Calanche of Piana, Gulf of Girolata, Scandola Reserve France • 31 Discovery Coast Atlantic Forest Reserves Brazil • 89 Lagoons of New Caledonia: Reef Diversity and Associated Ecosystems France • 32 Iguaçu National Park Brazil • 90 Pitons, cirques and remparts of Reunion Island France • 33 Pantanal Conservation Area Brazil • 91 Pyrénées – Mont Perdu (M) France, Spain • 34 Pirin National Park Bulgaria • 92 Ecosystem and Relict Cultural Landscape of Lopé-Okanda (M) Gabon • 35 Srebarna Nature Reserve Bulgaria • 93 Messel Pit Fossil Site Germany • 36 Dja Faunal Reserve Cameroon • Primeval Beech Forests of the Carpathians and the Ancient Beech 94 Germany, Slovakia, Ukraine • 37 Sangha Trinational Cameroon, Central African Republic, Congo • Forests of Germany 38 Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks Canada • 95 Meteora (M) Greece • 39 Dinosaur Provincial Park Canada • 96 Mount Athos (M) Greece • 40 Gros Morne National Park Canada • 97 Tikal National Park (M) Guatemala • 41 Joggins Fossil Cliffs Canada • 98 Río Plátano Biosphere Reserve * Honduras • 42 Miguasha National Park Canada • 99 Caves of Aggtelek Karst and Slovak Karst Hungary, Slovakia • 43 Nahanni National Park Canada • 100 Surtsey Iceland • 44 Wood Buffalo National Park Canada • 101 Great Himalayan National Park Conservation Area India • 45 Kluane / Wrangell-St. Elias / Glacier Bay / Tatshenshini-Alsek Canada, United States of America • 102 Kaziranga National Park India • 46 Waterton Glacier International Peace Park Canada, United States of America • 103 Keoladeo National Park India • 47 Manovo-Gounda St Floris National Park * Central African Republic • 104 Manas Wildlife Sanctuary India • 48 Lakes of Ounianga Chad • 105 Nanda Devi and Valley of Flowers National Parks India • 49 Chengjiang Fossil Site China • 106 Sundarbans National Park India • 50 China Danxia China • 107 Western Ghats India • 51 Huanglong Scenic and Historic Interest Area China • 108 Komodo National Park Indonesia • 52 Jiuzhaigou Valley Scenic and Historic Interest Area China • 109 Lorentz National Park Indonesia • 53 Mount Emei Scenic Area, including Leshan Giant Buddha Scenic Area (M) China • 110 Tropical Rainforest Heritage of Sumatra * Indonesia • 54 Mount Huangshan (M) China • 111 Ujung Kulon National Park Indonesia • 55 Mount Sanqingshan National Park China • 112 Isole Eolie (Aeolian Islands) Italy • 56 Mount Taishan (M) China • 113 Mount Etna Italy • 57 Mount Wuyi (M) China • 114 The Dolomites Italy • ) ) • • ) ) • • Sites marked * are currently on the List of World Heritage in Danger. (M) indicates mixed (natural/cultural) World Heritage sites Sites marked * are currently on the List of World Heritage in Danger. (M) indicates mixed (natural/cultural) World Heritage sites No Site Country No Site Country Other Natural World Heritage sites ( Other Natural World Heritage sites ( Natural World Heritage sites threatened by harmful industrial activities ( Natural World Heritage sites threatened by harmful industrial activities ( 115 Monte San Giorgio Italy, Switzerland • 173 Western Caucasus Russian Federation • 116 Blue and John Crow Mountains (M) Jamaica • 174 Pitons Management Area Saint Lucia • 117 Ogasawara Islands Japan • 175 Djoudj National Bird Sanctuary Senegal • 118 Shirakami-Sanchi Japan • 176 Niokolo-Koba National Park * Senegal • 119 Shiretoko Japan • 177 Aldabra Atoll Seychelles • 120 Yakushima Japan • 178 Vallée de Mai Nature Reserve Seychelles • 121 Wadi Rum Protected Area (M) Jordan • 179 Škocjan Caves Slovenia • 122 Saryarka – Steppe and Lakes of Northern Kazakhstan Kazakhstan • 180 East Rennell * Solomon Islands • 123 Kenya Lake System in the Great Rift Valley Kenya • 181 Cape Floral Region Protected Areas South Africa • 124 Lake Turkana National Parks Kenya • 182 iSimangaliso Wetland Park South Africa • 125 Mount Kenya National Park/Natural Forest Kenya • 183 Vredefort Dome South Africa • 126 Phoenix Islands Protected Area Kiribati • 184 Doñana National Park Spain • 127 Maloti-Drakensberg Park (M) Lesotho, South Africa • 185 Garajonay National Park
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Harmful Industrial Activities Other Natural World Heritage Sites
    MAP HARMFUL INDUSTRIAL 169 79 170 191 ACTIVITIES 171 100 87 151 45 43 168 WWF DEFINES HARMFUL 44 INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITIES AS: 207 172 204 80 Operations that cause major 167 38 39 81 94 23 203 disturbances or changes to the 46 93 166 141 42 40 94 94 122 218 193192 99 character of marine or terrestrial 165 41 115 114 164 environments. Such activities are of 221 179 119 71 35 173 91 88 142 34 concern due to their potential to involve 220 197 96 62 118 186 95 194 large impacts on the attributes of 217 112 199 222 184 200 214 215 198 113 56 outstanding universal value and other 52 162 101 51 163 natural, economic and cultural values. 136 212 105 58 54 120 187 85 121 53 61 The impacts of these activities are 185 144 50 55 117 140 103 145 60 57 219 137 213 1 104102 often long-term or permanent. 49 59 They can also be of concern due 72 22 139 106 224 138 73 134 48 216 135 149 226 to their impacts on the sustainability 24 116 97 82 175 196 225 of local livelihoods, and/or because 98 133 195 174 176 86 they put at risk the health, safety or 150 227 65 67 160 154 68 47 107 well-being of communities. Harmful 153 63 70 188 161 152 132 159 66 64 223 69 189 industrial activities are often, but not 190 36 74 37 124 131 exclusively, conducted by multinational 76 92 78 125 83 84 77 201202 123 enterprises and their subsidiaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Obtaining World Heritage Status and the Impacts of Listing Aa, Bart J.M
    University of Groningen Preserving the heritage of humanity? Obtaining world heritage status and the impacts of listing Aa, Bart J.M. van der IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2005 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Aa, B. J. M. V. D. (2005). Preserving the heritage of humanity? Obtaining world heritage status and the impacts of listing. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 23-09-2021 Appendix 4 World heritage site nominations Listed site in May 2004 (year of rejection, year of listing, possible year of extension of the site) Rejected site and not listed until May 2004 (first year of rejection) Afghanistan Península Valdés (1999) Jam,
    [Show full text]
  • Stevns Klint
    EUROPE / NORTH AMERICA STEVNS KLINT DENMARK Denmark – Stevns Klint WORLD HERITAGE NOMINATION – IUCN TECHNICAL EVALUATION STEVNS KLINT (DENMARK) – ID No. 1416 IUCN RECOMMENDATION TO WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE: To inscribe the property under natural criteria. Key paragraphs of Operational Guidelines: Paragraph 77: Nominated property meets World Heritage criteria. Paragraph 78: Nominated property meets integrity and protection and management requirements. 1. DOCUMENTATION protected area is in eastern Denmark. The nominated property includes intertidal cliffs and adjacent a) Date nomination received by IUCN: 20 March 2013 constructed tunnels and abandoned quarries which expose Cretaceous and Tertiary strata. A buffer zone of b) Additional information officially requested from 4,136 ha has been defined and provides protection for and provided by the State Party: Following the 471 ha of land adjacent to the cliffs and for 3,655 ha of technical evaluation mission the State Party was marine areas. The property is technically a serial requested to provide supplementary information on 13 property of two component parts, as there is a break in December 2013. The information was received on 28 the coastal section where a quarry export quay is February 2014. located at Stevns Kridtbrud. c) Additional literature consulted: Various sources as Stevns Klint illustrates the best-known global mass cited in the nomination, together with Wells, R. T. (1996) extinction event in the history of Earth, which marks the Earth's geological history: a contextual framework Cretaceous - Tertiary (K/T) boundary. This mass for assessment of World Heritage fossil site extinction occurred c.65 million years ago and is nominations. IUCN, Gland; Molina, E., Alegret, L., particularly notable due to its association with Chixulub Arenillas, I., Arz, J.A., Gallala, N., Hardenbol, J., von asteroid impact that took place in what is currently the Salis, K., Etienne Steurbaut5, Noel Vandenberghe, E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Destination Attractiveness and Visitor Segmentation on Holistic and Conative Outcomes
    THE INFLUENCE OF DESTINATION ATTRACTIVENESS AND VISITOR SEGMENTATION ON HOLISTIC AND CONATIVE OUTCOMES YALINI A/P EASVARALINGAM UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA 2019 THE INFLUENCE OF DESTINATION ATTRACTIVENESS AND VISITOR SEGMENTATION ON HOLISTIC AND CONATIVE OUTCOMES by YALINI A/P EASVARALINGAM Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2019 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT My joyful experience in this academic journey is parallel to the thrill, many an adventurous respondent of this National Park research would have received from traversing mountains and basking in natural beauty. For me, this thrill is due to traversing different research terrains and gaining knowledge attributed mainly to having a supervisor like Professor T. Ramayah, with his vast expertise in research and analysis, and his generosity in imparting this knowledge to me. His guidance on materials for good methodology and his immediate feedback at any time of the day eased the process of completing this research tremendously. I am also grateful to Dr. Teh Sin Yin, for her thoroughness in examining my thesis during the proposal stage. I also truly appreciate my external examiner, Prof. Madya Dr. Rosmini Omar and my internal examiners Dr. Teh Sin Yin and Prof. Madya Dr. Shankar Chelliah for their thoroughness in reading my thesis and providing feedback to improve the quality of the thesis. This journey too would not have been possible if it was not for the blessings of my wonderful parents and brother, whose unconditional love and continuous emotional and financial support assisted me when facing challenges throughout this research process. The completion of this thesis would also not have been possible if not for the expertise of my friends, the computer whiz, Viswa, and the translation expert Jaja.
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Overview of Protected Areas on the World Heritage List of Particular Importance for Biodiversity
    A GLOBAL OVERVIEW OF PROTECTED AREAS ON THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST OF PARTICULAR IMPORTANCE FOR BIODIVERSITY A contribution to the Global Theme Study of World Heritage Natural Sites Text and Tables compiled by Gemma Smith and Janina Jakubowska Maps compiled by Ian May UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre Cambridge, UK November 2000 Disclaimer: The contents of this report and associated maps do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP-WCMC or contributory organisations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP-WCMC or contributory organisations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION 1.0 OVERVIEW......................................................................................................................................................1 2.0 ISSUES TO CONSIDER....................................................................................................................................1 3.0 WHAT IS BIODIVERSITY?..............................................................................................................................2 4.0 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY......................................................................................................................3 5.0 CURRENT WORLD HERITAGE SITES............................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Wsn 146 (2020) 36-46 Eissn 2392-2192
    Available online at www.worldscientificnews.com WSN 146 (2020) 36-46 EISSN 2392-2192 Primary Response and Concern of Sabah’s Geopark Potential Economic Effects: Preliminary Study Rafiq Idris*, Kasim Mansur Faculty of Business, Economics and Accountancy, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia *Email address: [email protected] ABSTRACT Sabah, Malaysia is moving steps forward by announcing the gazettement of some areas as geoparks. Part of the areas include the district of Ranau, Kota Marudu and Kota Belud. Some of the areas involved if not all are under a national park program prior to this. This gazettement undoubtedly has the potential to bring economic benefit to the state. It has the potential to increase land value, stimulating economic activities especially in the services sector via tourism activities, enhancing protection for environment and as a mean to control aggressive use of land for development. On the other hand, there are some concerns of stakeholders. Issues such as potential restriction for farmers to do agriculture related activities and relocation of village among others are potential concern among communities in Ranau, Kota Marudu and Kota Belud. In this regard, in order to examine the real concerns of various stakeholders, some series of roundtable discussions and interviews have been undertaken. Based on the preliminary assessment, very small number of individuals have worry about the geopark idea. Majority look at it positively. Keyword: Sabah, Malaysia, Geopark, Economic Effects, Concern, Response, Kinabalu 1. INTRODUCTION National park is an area that the authority has designated for the preservation of the natural environment. Apart from being a public recreation area, national park is also important due to ( Received 07 May 2020; Accepted 25 May 2020; Date of Publication 26 May 2020 ) World Scientific News 146 (2020) 36-46 its historical, natural attractions and scientific interests, more so since most of its flora and fauna are invariably in its natural state.
    [Show full text]
  • Article (PDF, 1655
    J.micropal~ieontol.,5 (1): 37-47, April 1986 Danian dinoflagellate zonation, the C -T boundary and the stratigraphical position of the fish clay in southern Scandinavia STEFAN U. HULTBERG B P Research Centre, Sunbury-on-Thames, Middlesex ABSTRACT-Two Swedish borehole cores covering the Danian, and three Danish outcrop sections covering the Lower Danian, were analysed for dinoflagellates. This study suggests that the Swedish sections, in contrast to previous investigations, are the most complete sections across the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary in the Danish Embayment. As a consequence, the previously established biozonation can be modified to include one more basal Danian zonule. A detailed study of the dinoflagellates of the Fish Clay in Denmark suggests that this layer was formed in a low salinity environment in eastern Denmark and in a stable marine environ- ment in western Denmark. In addition, the Fish Clay is shown to be biostratigraphically older in eastern Denmark than in western Denmark. INTRODUCTION most Danian age (Rosenkrantz, 1966). It is a formation The Danish Embayment is a sedimentary basin of four thin clay layers, immediately overlying the containing Mesozoic and Cenozoic deposits. It is a part Maastrichtian chalk. The lowermost layer is a 2-4cm of the Danish-Polish Trough, which extends as a belt in thick marl bed of a whitish grey colour. Overlying it is a a north-westerly to south-easterly direction from 2-5cm thick dark brown to black bed with abundant Denmark across Poland. The Danish Embayment was pyrite concretions of varying size, which is in turn connected to the North Atlantic and Tethys through overlain by a 3-5cm thick dark grey marl bed, which narrow sea passages (Posaryska, 1965).
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Knowledge Dissemination-Still Not There
    Indigenous Knowledge Dissemination‐Still Not There Ibrahim Ahmad BAJUNID INTI Laureate University Page | 0 Abstract We have robust partial knowledge about what we know and in this strength, we are proud and arrogant about what we do. However, we are ignorant of alternatives and complementary knowledge, education and training. We know little of alternative or complementary medicine‐Chinese traditional medicine, Ayurveda and Islamic traditional medicine. We know little of the arts of self‐defence and the martial masters, and other training forms beyond WestPoint and Sandhurst. It is possible that people from the dominant knowledge mainstream will go through their lives without “having had to operate outside of the dominant knowledge systems or shift the paradigm through which a [person] views the world in order to make sense of things.” Indigenous Knowledge is not about the aborigines as subjects but it is about man’s knowledge from another perspective, at the fringe of, or aside of dominant knowledge systems. It is about the use of the inherited and evolving knowledge corpuses. To understand the importance of the knowledge of “the other” we have to understand their ways of knowing, of happying, of facing the trials and tribulations of change, often disruptive to their ecology. In some ways, in popular literature regarding the natives, (or in some other art forms), actors are made to articulate some perspectives and wisdom of native, marginalized and alienated people. The disconnect in contemporary civilization, especially, in educational enterprises is not about merely the obsolescence of their tools or thoughts, but about the embedded strengths of the native potentials and philosophies, interpretations and meaning‐findings in their lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Iucn Technical Evaluation Kinabalu Park (Sabah
    WORLD HERITAGE NOMINATION – IUCN TECHNICAL EVALUATION KINABALU PARK (SABAH, MALAYSIA) 1. DOCUMENTATION i) IUCN/WCMC Data Sheet: (16 references) ii) Additional Literature Consulted: IUCN-SSC. 1998. Global Action Plan for Microchiroptean Bats. Final Draft; Braatz, S. 1992. Conserving Biological Diversity: A Strategy for Protected Areas in Asia – Pacific Region. World Bank Technical Paper 193; Collins, M. et al eds. 1991. The Conservation Atlas of Tropical Forests – Asia and Pacific; IUCN McNeely, J. 1999. Mobilising Broader Support for Asia’s Biodiversity. ABD; MacKinnon, J. ed. 1997. Protected Area Systems Review of the Indomalayan Realm. ABC/WCMC; Hitchcock, P. 1998. Post World Heritage Seminar Report on Mission to Malaysia; CIFOR/UNESCO 1999. World Heritage Forests – The World Heritage Convention as a Mechanism for Conserving Tropical Forest Biodiversity; Cubitt, G. 1996. Wild Malaysia. New Holland; Meng, W. K. 1991. The State of Nature Conservation in Malaysia. Proceedings; Kitayama, K. 1993. Human Impacts and Implications for Management in Mount Kinabalu. in Hamilton, L. et al eds. 1993. Peaks, Parks and People. East-West Centre; IUCN/WWF. 1995. Centres of Plant Diversity. Vol. 2. Asia; MacKinnon, K. et al 1996. The Ecology of Kalimantan. Periplus; Khoom, Wong. 1998. Kinabalu: Sabah’s Tropical Paradise. Plant Talk (15); Cleary M and P. Eaton. 1992. Borneo – Change and Development. OUP; MacKinnon, J. 1975. Borneo. Time-Life Books; Brooks, R. R. 1987. Serpentine and its Vegetation. Croom Helm; Roberts, J. L. 1989. Geological Structures. Macmillan Field Guide. iii) Consultations: 13 external reviewers, officials from Sabah Forest Department, iv) Field Visit: J. Thorsell, January, 2000 2. SUMMARY OF NATURAL VALUES As the highest mountain between the Himalayas and New Guinea, Mount Kinabalu (4,095m) holds a distinctive position for the biota of Southeast Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 South-East Asia
    Chapter 6 South-East Asia South-East Asia is the least compact among the extremity of North-East Asia. The contiguous ar- regions of the Asian continent. Out of its total eas constituting the continental interior include land surface, estimated at four million sq.km., the the highlands of Myanmar, Thailand, Laos, and mainland mass has a share of only 40 per cent. northern Vietnam. The relief pattern is that of a The rest is accounted for by several thousand is- longitudinal ridge and furrow in Myanmar and lands of the Indonesian and Philippine archipela- an undulating plateau eastwards. These are re- goes. Thus, it is composed basically of insular lated to their structural difference: the former and continental components. Nevertheless the being a zone of tertiary folds and the latter of orographic features on both these landforms are block-faulted massifs of greater antiquity. interrelated. This is due to the focal location of the region where the two great axes, one of lati- The basin of the Irrawady (Elephant River), tudinal Cretaceo-Tertiary folding and the other forming the heartland of Myanmar, is ringed by of the longitudinal circum-Pacific series, converge. mountains on three sides. The western rampart, This interface has given a distinctive alignment linking Patkai, Chin, and Arakan, has been dealt to the major relief of the region as a whole. In with in the South Asian context. The northern brief, the basic geological structures that deter- ramparts, Kumon, Kachin, and Namkiu of the mine the trend of the mountains are (a) north- Tertiary fold, all trend north-south parallel to the south and north-east in the mainland interior, (b) Hengduan Range and are the highest in South- east-west along the Indonesian islands, and (c) East Asia; and this includes Hkakabo Raz north-south across the Philippines.
    [Show full text]
  • Nationell Strategi För Världsarvsarbetet
    Nationell strategi för världsarvsarbetet - Avrapportering av regeringsuppdraget att utarbeta en nationell världsarvsstrategi RIKSANTIKVARIEÄMBETET Nationell strategi för världsarvsarbetet – Avrapportering av regeringsuppdraget att utarbeta en nationell världsarvsstrategi Riksantikvarieämbetet Box 5405 114 84 Stockholm Tel 08-5191 80 00 www.raa.se [email protected] Riksantikvarieämbetet 2019 Nationell strategi för världsarvsarbetet – Avrapportering av regeringsuppdraget att utarbeta en nationell världsarvsstrategi Upphovsrätt, där inget annat anges, enligt Creative Commons licens CC BY. Villkor på http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.sv 2 Nationell strategi för världsarvsarbetet – Avrapportering av regeringsuppdraget att utarbeta en nationell världsarvsstrategi Innehållsförteckning Strategin i korthet ..................................................................................... 7 Ansvar och roller i världsarvsarbetet ................................................... 12 Inledning.................................................................................................. 15 Regeringsuppdrag att ta fram en nationell världsarvsstrategi ............. 15 Avgränsningar och samband med andra uppdrag .............................. 17 Genomförande ................................................................................... 18 Disposition .......................................................................................... 19 Fortsatt hantering av strategin ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Guide Book for Sildehøjgård Snekkevej 10, 4040 Jyllinge
    Guide Book for Sildehøjgård Snekkevej 10, 4040 Jyllinge Table of Content Important Phone Numbers ........................................................................................................... 2 The drinking water .................................................................................................................... 2 House Rules .............................................................................................................................. 2 Internet and Wi-Fi ..................................................................................................................... 3 The Electrical System..................................................................................................................... 3 The Bath Room ......................................................................................................................... 3 TV | Chromecast| DVD/Blue Ray Player | Hi-Fi microsystem with Bluetooth ......................... 3 Disposal of Waste ......................................................................................................................... 4 Apartment Layout ......................................................................................................................... 4 Short on Sildehøjgård .................................................................................................................... 5 Walking Along the Coastline ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]