DOCSLIB.ORG

National Energy Board L’Office National De L’Énergie

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Energy Board L’Office National De L’Énergie JOINT REVIEW PANEL FOR THE ENBRIDGE NORTHERN GATEWAY PROJECT COMMISSION D’EXAMEN CONJOINT DU PROJET ENBRIDGE NORTHERN GATEWAY Hearing Order OH-4-2011 Ordonnance d’audience OH-4-2011 Northern Gateway Pipelines Inc. Enbridge Northern Gateway Project Application of 27 May 2010 Demande de Northern Gateway Pipelines Inc. du 27 mai 2010 relative au projet Enbridge Northern Gateway VOLUME 126 Hearing held at Audience tenue à Sheraton Vancouver Wall Centre 1088 Burrard Street Vancouver, British Columbia January 16, 2013 Le 16 janvier 2013 International Reporting Inc. Ottawa, Ontario (613) 748-6043 © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2013 © Sa Majesté du Chef du Canada 2013 as represented by the Minister of the Environment représentée par le Ministre de l’Environnement et and the National Energy Board l’Office national de l’énergie This publication is the recorded verbatim transcript Cette publication est un compte rendu textuel des and, as such, is taped and transcribed in either of the délibérations et, en tant que tel, est enregistrée et official languages, depending on the languages transcrite dans l’une ou l’autre des deux langues spoken by the participant at the public hearing. officielles, compte tenu de la langue utilisée par le participant à l’audience publique. Printed in Canada Imprimé au Canada HEARING /AUDIENCE OH-4-2011 IN THE MATTER OF an application filed by the Northern Gateway Pipelines Limited Partnership for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity pursuant to section 52 of the National Energy Board Act, for authorization to construct and operate the Enbridge Northern Gateway Project. HEARING LOCATION/LIEU DE L'AUDIENCE Hearing held in Vancouver (British Columbia), Wednesday, January 16, 2013 Audience tenue à Vancouver (Colombie-Britannique), mercredi, le 16 janvier 2013 JOINT REVIEW PANEL/LA COMMISSION D’EXAMEN CONJOINT S. Leggett Chairperson/Présidente K. Bateman Member/Membre H. Matthews Member/Membre Transcript Hearing Order OH-4-2011 ORAL STATEMENTS/EXPOSÉS ORAUX Farah Shroff Ingrid Tamboline Kevin Afanasiff Johannah Wetzel Mike Gildersleeve Caitlin Birdsall Jeanette Ageson Urs Boxler Jenna Hunt Bill Darnell John Irwin Betty Davison Alan James Charles Easton Mary Ann Kae Rob Fleming Steve Lloyd Lorraine Fralin Hilary Mackey Myrna Franke Caitlin Meggs Elizabeth Haan Sebastian Merz Bryan Joe David Mivasair Gillian Darling-Kovanic Stan Proboszcz Eyal Lebel Nicholas Read Marc Lee Shelley Sorensen Karl Perrin Helga Sussmann Sheila Pratt Cornelia Sussmann Bev Ramey Andrea Sussmann Frances Sharpe Brianna Wright George Smith Kim Wright Marilyn Suddaby Transcript Hearing Order OH-4-2011 ERRATA (i) Monday, January 14, 2013 - Volume 124 Paragraph No.: Should read: 24484: “...systems that make up our plant.” “...systems that make up our planet.” 24497: “...the dangerously unknown territory...” “...the dangerous, unknown territory...” 24498: “A recent study in The Journal of Nature “A recent study in the journal Nature Climate Change shows...” Climate Change shows...” 24500: “...to keep fossil hydrocarbon out...” “...to keep fossil hydrocarbons out...” Transcript Hearing Order OH-4-2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS/TABLE DES MATIÈRES (i) Description Paragraph No./No. de paragraphe Opening remarks by the Chairperson 26134 Oral statement by Farah Shroff 26153 Oral statement by Marilyn Suddaby 26190 Oral statement by Kevin Afanasiff 26207 Oral statement by Mike Gildersleeve 26238 Oral statement by Bev Ramey 26266 Oral statement by Caitlin Birdsall 26277 Oral statement by Urs Boxler 26317 Oral statement by Bill Darnell 26357 Oral statement by Betty Davison 26393 Oral statement by Rob Fleming 26429 Oral statement by Charles Easton 26471 Oral statement by Lorraine Fralin 26491 Oral statement by Myrna Franke 26504 Oral statement by Elizabeth Haan 26546 Oral statement by Bryan Joe 26577 Oral statement by Gillian Darling-Kovanic 26599 Oral statement by Eyal Lebel 26632 Oral statement by Marc Lee 26650 Oral statement by Karl Perrin 26678 Oral statement by Sheila Pratt 26704 Oral statement by Frances Sharpe 26734 Oral statement by George Smith 26748 Oral statement by Ingrid Tamboline 26796 Oral statement by Johannah Wetzel 26818 Oral statement by Melissa Nelson 26841 Oral statement by Jeanette Ageson 26877 Oral statement by Alan James 26893 Oral statement by Mary Ann Kae 26916 Oral statement by Jenna Hunt 26935 Oral statement by John Irwin 26960 Oral statement by Hilary Mackey 26993 Oral statement by Steve Lloyd 27019 Oral statement by Caitlin Meggs 27040 Oral statement by Sebastian Merz 27054 Oral statement by David Mivasair 27085 Oral statement by Nicholas Read 27098 Oral statement by Stan Proboszcz 27112 Oral statement by Helga Sussmann 27149 Oral statement by Andrea Sussmann 27157 Oral statement by Cornelia Sussmann 27171 Transcript Hearing Order OH-4-2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS/TABLE DES MATIÈRES (ii) Description Paragraph No./No. de paragraphe Oral statement by Brianna Wright 27190 Oral statement by Kim Wright 27219 Oral statement by Shelley Sorensen 27243 Transcript Hearing Order OH-4-2011 Oral statements Exposés oraux --- Upon commencing at 1:00 p.m./L’audience débute à 13h00 26134. THE CHAIRPERSON: Good afternoon, everybody. 26135. My name is Sheila Leggett; on my right is Mr. Hans -- no, Mr. Kenneth Bateman --- 26136. MEMBER BATEMAN: Hello. 26137. THE CHAIRPERSON: --- and on my left is Mr. Hans Matthews. 26138. MEMBER MATTHEWS: Hi. 26139. THE CHAIRPERSON: Just before we get underway, I just have some brief opening remarks I'd like to make. 26140. The Panel welcomes the participation of individuals who have and are taking the time to present thoughtful oral statements presenting relevant views on aspects of this application not previously expressed is helpful to us. 26141. People have expressed their views and recommendations about the application in front of the Joint Review Panel. Kenneth, Hans and I take our responsibilities to this process and the public seriously. 26142. Yesterday we had a disruption that caused a brief delay in our ability to hear oral statements from registered speakers who came here prepared to share their views with the Panel. Our experience has shown us that this venue is optimal for listening to the views delivered in a respectful manner from registered speakers. It's our role to have a venue and a process where this can occur and that can be respectfully observed by both the public and the media. 26143. In order to minimize potential disturbances in Vancouver, the Panel decided to create a viewing room separate from the hearing room. We will continue with this approach for the reasons outlined previously. 26144. We're confident that we can continue to hear oral statements in Vancouver by those registered to speak without any disruptions, delays or need for further changes to the process. 26145. So with that, let's get underway and listen to you because that’s what Transcript Hearing Order OH-4-2011 Oral statements Exposés oraux we're here to do. 26146. So Mr. Afanasiff, please proceed with your oral statement. 26147. MR. KEVIN AFANASIFF: I didn’t realize I was going first. I wasn’t first on the list but I'm okay with that. 26148. DR. FARAH SHROFF: I thought I was first so I you --- 26149. MR. KEVIN AFANASIFF: Whatever, it's --- 26150. DR. FARAH SHROFF: Do you want me to speak first, because I was first on the list? 26151. THE CHAIRPERSON: You sound like you're ready to speak, so why don’t you go ahead. 26152. Thank you. Thanks for your flexibility, Mr. Afanasiff. --- ORAL STATEMENT BY/EXPOSÉ ORAL PAR DR. FARAH SHROFF: 26153. DR. FARAH SHROFF: Yeah, great. Good afternoon, it's a pleasure to be here. I’m Farah Shroff -- Dr. Farah Shroff. 26154. I want to acknowledge that we are here on the land that has been beautifully stewarded by the First Nations, the Musqueams and other Coast Salish Nations and how lucky we are for their beautiful stewardship. I've lived here most of my life and I feel like I've benefited a great deal from their stewardship. 26155. So who am I? I'm a university professor; I'm a researcher, a scientist, and an educator. I'm also a mother and my husband and I are raising a third generation in West Point Grey which is on Musqueam land. 26156. And I also lived in the Northwest Territories where Justice Tom Berger led an inquiry which is very similar to the one that you're charged with leading and I was really pleased that democracy worked that time, that that pipeline inquiry was able to really listen to the people and actually heard the voices and put those into action and I’m hoping that your inquiry is going to do a very similar thing. So I hope that the history books, many years to come, will talk about this inquiry in a very similar tone to that of the Berger Inquiry. Transcript Hearing Order OH-4-2011 Oral statements Exposés oraux 26157. I believe that you know that there's a very strong and active people's movement against this pipeline and I'm here to speak as one of the members of that movement. I believe that this pipeline is not in the public interest and I think it's been shown many, many times how clearly Canadians have spoken out against the pipeline. Indigenous groups have spoken out very, very strongly. We know that more than 130 First Nations' bands are against this pipeline crossing over and near their lands. 26158. We also know that there's a very, very exciting movement going on right now called the “Idle No More Movement” and they also expressed a very strong interest in keeping their lands clear and clean just like their ancestors. We know that youths have spoken out against it. I can tell you as a resident in my neighbourhood that my neighbours in West Point Grey are also very strongly against it and that people from all over Canada are against it.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Day Trips in British Columbia"
    "Day Trips in British Columbia" Realizado por : Cityseeker 20 Ubicaciones indicadas Vancouver "City of Glass" The coastal city, Vancouver is the third-largest metropolitan area in Canada. A town was first founded on this site in 1867 when an entrepreneurial proprietor built a tavern along the water. Since then, towering skyscrapers have grown to dominate the skyline like glittering pinnacles of glass backed by mountains dusted with snow. The vast by Public Domain sprawl of Vancouver is centred around downtown's glimmering milieu of towers. From here unfurls a tapestry of neighbourhoods, each with a distinct character of its own. Kitsilano's beachfront is defined as much by its heritage homes as its pristine sand, Gastown hosts the city's indie culture. Wherever you go, you'll encounter a menagerie of sights to attest to Vancouver's culture-rich soul. Independent art galleries abound alongside swathes of public art, while Shakespearean shows intermingle with a blooming live music offer. There's plenty for outdoor enthusiasts as well, and this is one of the few places where you can ski down a mountain, go kayaking, hike through the forest and lounge on the beach in the same day. At the end of it all, there's a sumptuous array of international restaurants, home to some of North America's most authentic Asian cuisines, fantastic farm-to-table dining and soul-stirring seafood creations; not to mention an extensive list of top-notch craft breweries. All this and more makes Vancouver the crown jewel of British Columbia. +1 604 683 2000 (Tourist vancouver.ca/ [email protected] Vancouver, Vancouver BC Information) Victoria "A Cosmopolitan City With English Verve" Originally established as a fort for the Hudson's Bay Company back in 1843, Victoria was long known as the most British city in North America.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birth of the Great Bear Rainforest: Conservation Science and Environmental Politics on British Columbia's Central and North Coast
    THE BIRTH OF THE GREAT BEAR RAINFOREST: CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS ON BRITISH COLUMBIA'S CENTRAL AND NORTH COAST by JESSICA ANNE DEMPSEY B.Sc, The University of Victoria, 2002 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Geography) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA July 2006 © Jessica Anne Dempsey, 2006 11 Abstract This thesis examines the birth of the Great Bear Rainforest, a large tract of temperate rainforest located on British Columbia's central and north coasts. While the Great Bear Rainforest emerges through many intersecting forces, in this study I focus on the contributions of conservation science asking: how did conservation biology and related sciences help constitute a particular of place, a particular kind of forest, and a particular approach to biodiversity politics? In pursuit of these questions, I analyzed several scientific studies of this place completed in the 1990s and conducted interviews with people involved in the environmental politics of the Great Bear Rainforest. My research conclusions show that conservation science played an influential role in shaping the Great Bear Rainforest as a rare, endangered temperate rainforest in desperate need of protection, an identity that counters the entrenched industrial-state geographies found in British Columbia's forests. With the help of science studies theorists like Bruno Latour and Donna Haraway, I argue that these conservation studies are based upon purification epistemologies, where nature - in this case, the temperate rainforest - is separated out as an entity to be explained on its own and ultimately 'saved' through science.
    [Show full text]
  • ^Mllm^Frmum the S.S
    ^MllM^frMUm THE S.S. PRINCE GEORGE ACCOMMODATION AND EQUIPMENT The luxurious, new Prince George—5800 tons, length 350 feet, speed 18 knots—is of the very latest design and especially built for Pacific Coast service to Alaska. It has accommodation for 260 passengers and its comfortable staterooms are the last word in convenience and smartness. Staterooms are equipped with outlet for electric razors. In all cabins the fold-away beds disappear into the wall in daytime. In addition it is outfitted with the most modern devices for the utmost safety in navigation. The Prince George has seven decks and eight, spacious public rooms, including clubrooms and sitting rooms. Nothing has been overlooked in providing for the com­ fort of the passengers on the ten day cruise from Vancouver, B.C,, to Skagway, Alaska, and return. This Booklet Describes, in a concise manner, the water­ ways traversed and the ports of call made by Canadian National Steamer, S.S. "Prince George." Explains the necessary official formalities in passing from one country to another, that, with understanding, they may prove less irksome. Anticipates the vacationist's queries while enroute on one of the world's most scenic waterways. The Inside Pas­ sage to Alaska. If an extra copy is required to pass on to some friend, just drop a note to the nearest Canadian National representative listed on page 34. // you wish he will mail it for you. TABLE OF CONTENTS Embarkation at Vancouver 7 Checking Passengers on and off Steamer- 14 Descriptive Notes 14 to 31 Dining Saloon 8 Distances Between Vancouver—Skagway„ 6 Immigration and Customs Regulations 12-13 List of Canadian National Ticket Offices 34 Service Suggestions 8-10 S.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ghost Runs: the Future of Wild Salmon on the North and Central Coasts of British Columbia
    Ghost Runs: The Future of Wild Salmon on the North and Central Coasts of British Columbia Editors: Brian Harvey and Misty MacDuffee Suggested Citation Harvey, B., and M. MacDuffee — editors. 2002. Ghost Runs: The future of wild salmon on the north and central coasts of British Columbia. Raincoast Conservation Society. Victoria, BC. 2002 Raincoast Conservation Society. All rights reserved. ISBN: 0-9688432-1-2 Printed in Canada. Cover: 100% post consumer recycled paper The Raincoast Conservation Society The Raincoast Conservation Society is a non-profit research and public education organization. In partnership with scientists, First Nations and non-governmental organizations, we carry out research and generate public awareness to build support for decisions that protect bear, wolf, salmon and ancient forest habitat in British Columbia’s Great Bear Rainforest. Victoria Mailing Address PO Box 8663 Victoria, BC Canada V8W 3S2 Field Office Mailing Address PO Box 26 Bella Bella, BC Canada, V0T 1B0 www.raincoast.org Photography Ian McAllister unless otherwise noted Design and Layout Beacon Hill Communications Group Table of Contents Acknowledgements and contributing authors ........................................................................................................ 3 PREFACE Brian Harvey, World Fisheries Trust...................................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Implementing Sustainability at Alcan Primary Metal - British Columbia
    IMPLEMENTING SUSTAINABILITY AT ALCAN PRIMARY METAL - BRITISH COLUMBIA Sheldon Shawn Zettler B.Sc., University of Winnipeg, 1990 B.Sc. Environmental Engineering, University of Guelph, 1995 Graduate Diploma, Business Administration, Simon Fraser University, 2003 PROJECT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION In the Faculty of Business Administration Executive MBA O Shawn Zettler 2005 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Fall 2005 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. APPROVAL Name: Sheldon Shawn Zettler Degree: Master of Business Administration Title of Project: Implementing Sustainability at Alcan Primary Metal - British Columbia Supervisory Committee: Dr. Mark Selman, Senior Supervisor Executive Director, Learning Strategies Group, Faculty of Business Administration Dr. Mark Moore, Second Reader Lecturer, Faculty of Business Administration Date Approved: SIMON~~~~~mlibrary FRASER DECLARATION OF PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENCE The author, whose copyright is declared on the title page of this work, has granted to Simon Fraser University the right to lend this thesis, project or extended essay to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. The author has further granted permission to Simon Fraser University to keep or make a digital copy for use in its circulating collection, and, without changing the content, to translate the thesislproject or extended essays, if technically possible, to any medium or format for the purpose of preservation of the digital work.
    [Show full text]
  • Fate of Diluted Bitumen Spilled in the Coastal Waters of British Columbia
    NRC Publications Archive Archives des publications du CNRC Fate of diluted bitumen spilled in the coastal waters of British Columbia, Canada Johannessen, Sophia C.; Greer, Charles W.; Hannah, Charles G.; King, Thomas L.; Lee, Kenneth; Pawlowicz, Rich; Wright, Cynthia A. This publication could be one of several versions: author’s original, accepted manuscript or the publisher’s version. / La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur. For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous. Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.110691 Marine Pollution Bulletin, 150, pp. 1-13, 2019-11-16 NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC : https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=4f50cdab-b72a-4572-a8b9-7a5ba536f2ae https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=4f50cdab-b72a-4572-a8b9-7a5ba536f2ae Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE. L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB. Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • LNG Canada Export Terminal Section 13 – Background on Potentially Affected Aboriginal Groups October 2014
    PART C — ABORIGINAL GROUPS INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS Environmental Assessment Certificate Application LNG Canada Export Terminal Section 13 – Background on Potentially Affected Aboriginal Groups October 2014 The copyright of this document is vested in LNG Canada Development Inc. All rights reserved. LNG Canada Export Terminal Environmental Assessment Certificate Application Section 13: Background On Potentially Affected Aboriginal Groups 13 BACKGROUND ON POTENTIALLY AFFECTED ABORIGINAL GROUPS As set out in the June 6, 2013, section 11 Order, the following Aboriginal Groups may be affected by the Project: . Schedule B (Facility and associated activities) Haisla Nation . Schedule C (Shipping activities) Haisla Nation Gitga’at First Nation Gitxaala Nation Kitselas First Nation Kitsumkalum First Nation Lax Kw’alaams First Nation, and Metlakatla First Nation. Schedule D (Notification) Métis Nation British Columbia As a Schedule D group, Métis Nation British Columbia (MNBC) is included in this section of the Application. The section 13 Order issued by the EAO on August 7, 2013, amended Schedule D of the section 11 Order to clarify that the consultation activities (i.e., notification) with MNBC listed on Schedule D are to be conducted by BC on behalf of the Government of Canada, and is not an acknowledgement by BC that it owes a duty of consultation or accommodation to Métis in BC under section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982. In accordance with the AIR, this section of the Application provides available background information for those
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Agenda
    PLANNING COMMITTEE: 300 - 4545 Lazelle Avenue Terrace, B.G. Friday, June 25,20'10, commencing at 4:00 p.m. SUPPLEMENTARY AGENDA 1. Report from Administration, dated June 24,2010, re: Withdrawal of Application for Development Variance Permit No. 80 - 421 Kalum Lake Road, Terrace. 2. Report from Administration, dated January 25, 2010, re: License of Occupation for Commercial Recreation Kitamaat Village and Douglas Channel. 3. Report from Admlnistration, dated June 25, 2010, re: Land Use Application Status Report. Information Only: To: Planning Committee From: Administration Date: June 24,2010 Re: Withdrawal of Application for Development Variance Permit No. 80 - 421Kalum Lake Road, Terrace This is an application for a Development Variance Permit (DVP) for property located at 421 Kalum Lake Road in North Terrace. The property is legally described as Block 1, District Lot 1702, Range 5, Coast District, Plan 1086' Except 11795. The variance was required because the property owner had proposed to build a carport addition on to the front of the house that will encroach 2.09 feet (0.63 meters) on required 25 feet setback from the front propefty line and road right of way Plan 11795. On June 22nd, the property owner, Mr. Carrita, informed Regional District staff that the survey plan submitted earlier with DVP No. 80 had the proposed carport positioned incorrectly on the plan. He submitted a revised survey plan showing the correct orientation and location of the carport which would now be able to meet the required 25 feet setback from road right of way Plan 11795. Since a variance is no longer required for the proposed carport he has withdrawn his application for DVP No.
    [Show full text]
  • Huchsduwachsdu Nuyem Jees/Kitlope Heritage Conservancy Management Plan
    Huchsduwachsdu Nuyem Jees/ Kitlope Heritage Conservancy Management Plan May 2012 Haisla Nation Huchsduwachsdu Nuyem Jees/Kitlope Heritage Conservancy Management Plan Approved by: Huchsduwachsdu Nuyem Jees/Kitlope Heritage Conservancy Management Plan Plan Highlights The Huchsduwachsdu Nuyem Jees/Kitlope Heritage Conservancy is collaboratively managed by the Haisla First Nation and the Province of British Columbia through the Kitlope Management Committee. Henaaksiala/Haisla1 cultural values and natural processes will prevail within the conservancy. In the longer term, a Henaaksiala/Haisla cultural centre, built in traditional longhouse style, will provide a place for visitors to learn how Haisla identity is unified through a spiritual connection to the Huchsduwachsdu Nuyem Jees. The cultural centre will exhibit traditional and science- based practices. It will provide shelter, welcome and warmth for visitors to this remote watershed. A key recommendation of the management plan is to encourage and establish research and interpretive programs that utilize traditional ecological knowledge and science-based research to contribute to understanding the ecosystems of the greater coastal area and to inform management practices. The conservancy provides a world-class learning ground for combining scientific research with traditional ecological knowledge, leading to complementary approaches to resource management. The management plan encourages cultural and ecological tourism as well as boating, camping, hiking and fishing. A few developed trails will provide an opportunity for visitors to explore the high country as well as the landscape along the inland waters adjacent to the cultural centre. Haisla Paddlers at Tenth Anniversary of the Decision to Protect the Kitlope 1 Throughout the management plan there will be many references to Henaaksiala and to Haisla people.
    [Show full text]
  • [Anadian National Steamships S.S
    DESCRIPTIVE INIMISEIEMPROL SUGGESTIONS ON ME MEMO, TO ALASKA [ANADIAN NATIONAL STEAMSHIPS S.S. "PRINCE RUPERT", "PRINCE GEORGE" AND "PRINCE ROBERT" ACCOMMODATION AND EQUIPMENT The Canadian National steamers "Prince Rupert" and "Prince George," in the regu- lar Alaska service, are sister ships, with an average running speed of sixteen knots. They have a length of three hundred and eighteen feet with forty-two feet beam and were specially designed for the Northern British Columbia and Alaska service. Oil fuel is used. There are four decks, known as the boat, shade, shelter and main decks, and accom- modation for two hundred and eight first- class passengers in ninety-eight two-berth staterooms and six de luxe suites. The din- ing saloon seats 122. The S.S. "Prince Robert" making the special 11-day cruises has a length of 384 feet and a speed of 221/2 knots. The pas- senger accommodation for 331 first class passengers is located on three of her six decks. The public rooms are spacious and handsomely decorated, a special feature being the large observation room on "B" deck, from which unobstructed view is afforded through broad windows. The ac- commodation includes special suites de luxe with twin-beds and private bathroom, two- berth rooms with private shower and the remainder of the rooms have two berths. Page Two This Booklet Describes, in a concise manner, the water- ways traversed and the ports of call made by Canadian National Steam- ers, S.S. "Prince Robert," S.S. "Prince George" and S.S. "Prince Rupert." Explains the necessary official formali- ties in passing from one country to another, that, with understanding, they may prove less irksome.
    [Show full text]
  • Fjords! (Especially the Kitimat Fjord System)
    Bangarang February 2014 Backgrounder1 Fjords! (especially the Kitimat Fjord System) Eric Keen Abstract Fjords are awesome, and sometimes there are whales in them. This raises some questions: First of all, where do fjord babies come from? (Some Great Ice Cream Scoop in the Sky???) Why should we care about them? (Where to begin?) Where in the world do they happen? (A Goldilocks temperate zone and it’s perty too!) Why are British Columbia’s fjords the best? (If you’ve ever visited them you wouldn’t be asking such stupid questions.) What do you know about the fjords of the Gitga’at Territory and the Bangarang study area? (Ah, the Kitimat Fjord System! Where to begin?!) Contents Introduction Defined Worldwide British Columbia The Kitimat Fjord System Physical-Chemical Oceanography Freshwater Input Circulation Estuarine Wind-Driven Tidal Features Property Distribution Vertical Structure Horizontal Structure Seasonality Other Properties (pH, DO, nutrients) Deep & Bottom Waters Sediments Literature Cited 1 Bangarang Backgrounders are imperfect but rigorous reviews – written in haste, not peer-reviewed – in an effort to organize and memorize the key information for every aspect of the project. They will be updated regularly as new learnin’ is incorporated. 1 Introduction Due to the complexity of their ecological space, coastal waters comprise some of the most diverse and productive marine habitats on earth (Levin & Dayton 2009). This high biodiversity is the cornerstone of lucrative fisheries, tourism industries, and innumerable ecosystem services, including nutrient cycling, nursery habitat, food web support, carbon sequestration, and tourism revenue (Turner 2000). And yet, while the health of coastal waters is the most economically valuable and easily monitored of marine systems, they are also among the most endangered (Gray 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • The Kitimat River Estuary Status of Environmental Knowledge To
    -1475 obtx ci MINETTE II .z4 15 / il31 Robiate DFO - Libra / MPO - B bliotheque BA Y „I CJ Is 18 122 Lake 5 II 1 I 11 1 1111 11 11 04012730 02 3 8.0 7 Yo 0 3' Lasha NOTE Aluminum o. of anada Smelter Lake Aids to Navigation at Kitimat FG are privately maintained. / ut if Kitimat FG 11111(P.o.) s 001: (See Chart 3736) FIR 3 FIG 3 5 3 o 1 1611--- -22 •••.t3 ,V •-- W rf 2, 4))4 • l'31 49 40 'od'o B. M. 34;14 2LtsFR 57 1 (61 72 2. 75 M 73 49. I s' • 86 Kitimat 'Mission 5, 84 :.(Indian Settlement) 88 66 :2i: 23/ • / • 4'N T96 RI V 384 95 96 1 ' 32 1 .. .... 34/ 1311 -o STATlfS 61 I / .- M 41 — ,- ........: 0 ioe - o 69 53 L VIA? W ir: TA L, K N 35., 110 v. Itt M -Risk 3 1 462 .. /2 / 2 ■ '..3 CI) t, 18 ,- 75 m 119 I R 116 ' / fl, .;32. 97 / 20 122 • 41 I 38 45-7I ; 58 ' 4Sy 107 38 432 93/ 18, 120 M \38 55: 129 Fl 109 31 143 I R 12 Emsley 25 Cove .;''" 1.13) 71 142 . 37 116 153 /68 150 31 3 8/ 152 \SPECIA 152 114 , . (SY • 62 . 2 133 II 2 Brentzen,9 3 \ .•., 14 MI Coste Pt.,36 RI Rk. 55 72L . II 164 ' /34 153\ 94 P'::. ..'.' t 990M92.>.(a.4-bl\.. 3\0) • 6 .. • i ' *--' 80 \ja .104 56 • 88 :70 108 70l I i 15 4 r , ENVIRONMENT CANADA THE KITIMAT RIVER ESTUARY STATUS OF ENVIRONMENTAL KNOWLEDGE TO 1976 REPORT OF THE ESTUARY WORKING GROUP DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT REGIONAL BOARD PACIFIC REGION By LEONARD M.
    [Show full text]