Speech Acts and Word-World Relationship: Aphenomenological Perspective

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Speech Acts and Word-World Relationship: Aphenomenological Perspective SPEECH ACTS AND WORD-WORLD RELATIONSHIP: APHENOMENOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF Ph.D IN PHILOSOPHY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH BENGAL BY._... SATI SINGH UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF DR. MANJULIKA GHOSH UNIVERSITY OF NORTH BENGAL RAJA RAMMOHUNPUR, DARJEELING APRIL, 2009 Preface I was drawn to the theme of my research work through the instructions of my teachers in the Department of Philosophy, University of North Bengal during my Post-Graduate studentship. I was captivated both by analytic philosophy as well as the phenomenology of Husserl which was a closed world to us in our Under-Graduate class. In my work I have not said anything completely original. I have tried to restate, reanalyse, revaluate positions and arguments critically and discover hidden connections. Bridge building between desperate traditions in philosophy has started. l consider my work as an endeavour to understand this intellectual climate. ( Sati Singh) . ' Acknowledgement I owe a deep sense of gratitude to my supervisor Dr. (Mrs.) Manjulika Ghosh for everything she has done for me in the way of inspiring, helping and providing invaluable guidance and also in improving my style and expression. But for her I could not have completed this project. Dr. Ghosh who retired as a Professor in the Department of Philosophy. University of North Bengal in 2006. helped me in choosing the specific area of my work which is a further development of my M. Phil. Dissertation. The Supervisor of my M. Phil. Dissertation was Dr. Gautam Biswas who is now a Professor in the Department of Philosophy of Assam University, Silchar. In fact the tirst impetus to treat the speech act theory came from them. f am fortunate enough to have such vvonderful teachers as my supervisors for the Ph. D. and M. Phil. Dissertations. I cannot forego the pleasure of thanking my teachers in the Philosophy spcciall; for their encouragement to think of. or to remember philosophy as something more than the preoccupation of specialists. My heartfelt thanks go to Professor Raghunath Ghosh. Head of the Department of Philosophy and Director. SAP (U .G .C.) for his kind words of encouragement. lie told me that the word-world relationship can be studied from the perspective of Indian Philosophy \vhich could be delved into in my project. But I could not make it a part of work due to sheer want of time. I sincerely wish to take up the study in an opportune moment. As an alumnus of the Department of Philosophy of this University I remember Late Prof. Chinmoy Goswami who later joined the Department of Philosophy of Hyderabad University and Late Professor Chandidas Bhattacharya for many interaction I had with them. l am also grateful for their courtesy and kindness. 11 Thanks are due also to Dr. J. C. Basak, Teacher-in-Charge, Departmental Library, Philosophy for allowing me to avail of library services. I am specially benefited by consulting the books procured under the SAP, by the Director, Professor Raghunath Ghosh. A paper of mine entitled "Austin's Concept of Performative as An Attempt Towards Conjoining Language and Reality" allied to my research work was published in the SAP volume on Language and Ontology. I acknowledge my debt to the editor, Dr. Kanti Lal Das for this kind gesture. I also wish to put on record the graciousness of Professor Raghunath Ghosh for allowing me to present papers related to my topic in the National Seminars held in the Department under the SAP. I am indeed grateful to the University Grants Commission for granting me three years' leave under F.l.P. l am also obliged to Dr. rvfanjuri Bisv.ras, Principal. Thakur Panchanan Mahila Mahavidyalaya. Cooch Behar to allow me to avail ofthis opportunity. I thank the Librarian, Officers and Staff of the North Bengal l Jniversity Central I ,ihrary for providing me all kinds of facility in connectwn \Vith 111) research work. l am grateful to my loving younger brother Mr. Joyanta Singh and my sister-in-law· Mrs. Neeta Singh for their graceful hospitality during my stay at Siliguri in connection with my work. To my husband, Mr. Dhirendra Bahadur Singh, and young daughter, Rajeshwari Singh, I stand in personal gratitude for emotional support and encouragement. I specially thank my young daughter and my nephew Kunal Singh who wondered what I was doing when I inexplicably scribbled away those many afternoons and evenings depriving them of my company. lll I thank my fellow researchers S. M. Rakibuj Zaman and Sushovan Deb Barman as well as senior M. Phil student Anup Das for helping me in innumerable ways. I thank Sri Mayukh Dutta of the Departmental Seminar Library for his co-operation. I dedicate the work to my parents acknowledging a daughter's debt to them. I thank Mr. Sudhangshu Kr. Das of Computer Link, Shibmandir for composing, printing and binding the thesis in a presentable manner. I also thank all those whom I cannot individually name for their wishes and help. (Sati Singh) IV Contents Preface Acknowledgement 11-lV Chapter I 1-27 Introduction Word-World Relationship: A Fundamental Problem in Philosophy of Language Chapter II 28-96 Word-World Relationship: An Exposition of the Views of Some Analytic Philosophers Chapter III 97-121 A Phenomenological Account of Language and Meaning Chapter IV 122-136 Austin's Speech Act Theory and Its Phenomenological Interpretation Chapter V 137-153 Some Recent Developments in Speech Act Theory Chapter VI 154-179 Concluding Remarks Select Bibliography 180-205 v Chapter I Introduction Word-World Relationship: A Fundamental Problem In Philosophy of Language Man's preoccupation with language has had a long history. Language matters to philosophers as it does to the poet, the novelist, the linguist, the grammarian and others interested in language. Yet the philosopher's concern with language goes to a basic level. Philosophers have been concerned with the mysticism enshrined in language, and baffled by it. Now, poets and mystics may also be baffled by the workings of language. What, however, marks out the philosopher's distinctive approach to language is that he seeks his way out of the mystery, and attempt to arrive at an understanding of language, its nature and function. Hence, the philosopher's problem at the basic level is not how we form a well­ formed formula, but the singularly surprising phenomenon of what renders a licit concatenation of signs express meaning. How is it that the employment of a well-formed sentence means such and such a state of affairs; how to read off from another sentence, even in advance what will make it true; how is it possible for the ·mere signs' of language to be intentional, that is, for a name to reach up to the very object itself of which the name is the name and for a sentence, to a state of affairs? These questions were raised by Plato himself but these are vigorously discussed in the analytical tradition, be it conceptual analysis or analysis of language which goes by the name "linguistic philosophy'. Let us digress for a while to clarify these notions. Conceptual analysis, instead of words, or without looking at words attends to concepts or universals which words signify; the reason could be that words are inadequate to express concepts. Language analysis or linguistic philosophy has been broadly classified into ideal language philosophy and the ordinary language philosophy. The ideal language is an improved language free from the vicissitudes of ordinary, common sense language. The formulation of ideal language as the 'logical syntax' of ordinary sentences, i.e. a logically correct language, was initiated by Rudolf Camap in The Logical Syntax of Language. 1 Ordinary language philosophy, on the other hand, claims that ordinary language with its historic-grammatical syntax is well-equipped to analyse typical philosophical problems of knowledge, being, object, other mind, and so on. For both types of linguistic philosophy, it has been said that "' ... the only difference between Ideal Language Philosophers and Ordinary Language Philosophers is a disagreement about which language is Ideal."2 Such a characterization of linguistic philosophy is also made by Gustav Bergmann3 in the following passage: All linguistic philosophers talk about the world by means of talking about a suitable language. This is the linguistic tum, the fundamental gambit as to method, on which ordinary and ideal language philosophers (OLP, ILP) agree. Equally fundamentally, they disagree on what is in this sense a "language" and what makes it "suitable". One thing more to be clarified is that the three studies ( 1) Philosophy of Language, (2) Linguistic Philosophy and (3) Analytic Philosophy are three overlapping philosophical methods. A full account of their checkered career is beyond our present purpose. We simply note that despite subtle distinctions between them they are used interchangeably, and we also propose to so use them whenever the occasion arises. The purpose of making the digression is that it lays bare the linguistic orientation of philosophy or the linguistic tum which has been the comer stone of analytic philosophy. This linguistic orientation is basically the search for the root of our understanding of word-world relationship. Since our present concern is the word-world relationship, let us make an attempt to concentrate on the two very important elements in man's experiential framework - language and reality. Language, broadly speaking, stands for any system of signs, verbal and non-verbal. It is defined as an abstract system of symbols and their modes of combination. To put it in more concrete terms, language is the medium of human communication that people use to express thought, emotions. attitudes, etc. Viewed in this way, language is basically a set of words (vocabulary), used following a set of rules and conventions.
Recommended publications
  • David Suchoff Family Resemblances: Ludwig Wittgenstein As a Jewish Philosopher the Admonition to Silence with Which Wittgenstein
    David Suchoff Family Resemblances: Ludwig Wittgenstein as a Jewish Philosopher The admonition to silence with which Wittgenstein ended the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (1922) also marks the starting point for the emer- gence of his Jewish philosophical voice. Karl Kraus provides an instructive contrast: as a writer well known to Wittgenstein, Kraus’s outspoken and aggressive ridicule of “jüdeln” or “mauscheln” –the actual or alleged pronunciation of German with a Jewish or Yiddish accent – defined a “self-fashioning” of Jewish identity – from German and Hebrew in this case – that modeled false alternatives in philosophic terms.1 Kraus pre- sented Wittgenstein with an either-or choice between German and Jewish identity, while engaging in a witty but also unwitting illumination of the interplay between apparently exclusive alternatives that were linguistically influenced by the other’s voice. As Kraus became a touchstone for Ger- man Jewish writers from Franz Kafka to Walter Benjamin and Gershom Scholem, he also shed light on the situation that allowed Wittgenstein to develop his own non-essentialist notion of identity, as the term “family resemblance” emerged from his revaluation of the discourse around Judaism. This transition from The False Prison, as David Pears calls Wittgenstein’s move from the Tractatus to the Philosophical Investiga- tions, was also a transformation of the opposition between German and Jewish “identities,” and a recovery of the multiple differences from which such apparently stable entities continually draw in their interconnected forms of life.2 “I’ll teach you differences,” the line from King Lear that Wittgenstein mentioned to M. O’C. Drury as “not bad” as a “motto” for the Philo- sophical Investigations, in this way represents Wittgenstein’s assertion of a German Jewish philosophic position.
    [Show full text]
  • Linguistic Scepticism in Mauthner's Philosophy
    LiberaPisano Misunderstanding Metaphors: Linguistic ScepticisminMauthner’s Philosophy Nous sommes tous dans un désert. Personne ne comprend personne. Gustave Flaubert¹ This essayisanoverview of Fritz Mauthner’slinguistic scepticism, which, in my view, represents apowerful hermeneutic category of philosophical doubts about the com- municative,epistemological, and ontological value of language. In order to shed light on the main features of Mauthner’sthought, Idrawattention to his long-stand- ing dialogue with both the sceptical tradition and philosophyoflanguage. This con- tribution has nine short sections: the first has an introductory function and illus- tratesseveral aspectsoflinguistic scepticism in the history of philosophy; the second offers acontextualisation of Mauthner’sphilosophyoflanguage; the remain- der present abroad examination of the main features of Mauthner’sthought as fol- lows: the impossibility of knowledge that stems from aradicalisationofempiricism; the coincidencebetween wordand thought,thinkingand speaking;the notion of use, the relevanceoflinguistic habits,and the utopia of communication; the decep- tive metaphors at the root of an epoché of meaning;the new task of philosophyasan exercise of liberation against the limits of language; the controversial relationship between Judaism and scepticism; and the mystical silence as an extreme conse- quence of his thought.² Mauthnerturns scepticism into aform of life and philosophy into acritique of language, and he inauguratesanew approach that is traceable in manyGerman—Jewish
    [Show full text]
  • Realismus – Relativismus – Konstruktivismus Realism – Relativism – Constructivism
    Realismus – Relativismus – Konstruktivismus Realism – Relativism – Constructivism Programm des 38. Internationalen Wittgenstein Symposiums 9. – 15. August 2015 Kirchberg am Wechsel Program of the 38th International Wittgenstein Symposium August 9 – 15, 2015 Kirchberg am Wechsel Für aktuelle Programmänderungen beachten Sie bitte die Aushänge oder siehe: http://www.alws.at/program_2015.pdf. www.alws.at Program subject to change, for updates please refer to the postings or go to: http://www.alws.at/program_2015.pdf. Wir danken folgenden Institutionen und Personen für die finanzielle Unterstützung des Symposiums: We thank the following institutions and persons for their financial support of the symposium: Landeshauptmann von Niederösterreich Dr. Erwin Pröll Amt der NÖ Landesregierung, Abteilung Wissenschaft und Forschung Hofrat Dr. Joachim Rössl Mag. Paul Pennerstorfer Mag. Georg Pejrimovsky Mag. Matthias Kafka Marktgemeinde Kirchberg am Wechsel Bürgermeister DI Dr. Willibald Fuchs Gemeinde Trattenbach Bürgermeister Johannes Hennerfeind Raiffeisenbank NÖ-Alpin Direktor Johannes Pepelnik Leader Region Bucklige Welt-Wechselland Leader-Manager Franz Piribauer Kurdirektorin Maria Haarhofer Sound Art Service, Stefan Schlögl Gasthof Grüner Baum, Kirchberg am Wechsel Gasthof St. Wolfgang, Kirchberg am Wechsel Gasthof zur 1000-jährigen Linde, Kirchberg am Wechsel Familie Hennrich Taxi – Autobusunternehmen Karl Mayerhofer Kleinbusunternehmen Ingrid Fahrner Impressum: Eigentümer, Verleger und Herausgeber: Österreichische Ludwig Wittgenstein Gesellschaft, Markt 63, A-2880 Kirchberg am Wechsel. Redaktion des Programms: Christian Kanzian, Josef Mitterer, Katharina Neges. Visuelle Gestaltung: Sascha Windholz. Druck: Eigner Druck; 3040 Neulengbach. Beiträge, Abstrakta-Heft und Programm wurden mit Hilfe eines von Joseph Wang, Universität Innsbruck, erarbeiteten Datenbankprogramms erstellt. Kontakt: [email protected] Papers, book of abstracts and program were produced using a database application developed by Joseph Wang, University of Innsbruck, Austria.
    [Show full text]
  • Artificial Intelligence and Language Old Questions in a New Key
    COMPLEX AI-BASED SYSTEMS AND THE FUTURES OF LANGUAGE, HENRIK SINDING-LARSEN (ed) KNOWLEDGE AND RESPONSIBILITY IN PROFESSIONS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LANGUAGE OLD QUESTIONS IN A NEW KEY 7/88 CompLex nr. 7/88 AI based systems and the future of language, knowledge and responsibility in professions A COST-13 project Secretariat: Swedish Center for Working Life Box 5606 S-l 1486 STOCKHOLM - Sweden Henrik Sinding-Larsen (ed.) ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LANGUAGE Old questions in a new key TANO OSLO © Tano A.S. 1988 ISBN 82-518-2550-4 Printed in Norway by Engers Boktrykkeri A/S, Otta Preface This report is based on papers, presentations and ideas from the research seminar Artificial Intelligence and Language that took place at Hotel Lutetia, Paris 2.-4. November 1987. The seminar was organised by the research project AI-based Systems and the Future of Language, Knowledge and Responsibility in Professions. The seminar as well as the project was financed by a grant from the Commission of the European Communities through the research programme COST-13. The project has been initiated and conducted by the following institutions: • Institute of informatics, University of Oslo • Swedish Centre for Working Life, Stockholm • Norwegian Research Institute for Computers and Law, University of Oslo • Austrian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Vienna The project secretariat has been at the Swedish Centre for Working Life, Box 5606, S - 11486 Stockholm, Sweden. Project coordinator has been professor Kristen Nygaard, Institute of informatics, University of Oslo. An important activity within the project has been to create a forum for collaboration among European researchers from different disciplines concerned with the impact of artificial intelligence on society and culture.
    [Show full text]
  • 8897690 Lprob 1.Pdf
    CAMBRIDGE AND VIENNA FRANK P. RAMSEY AND THE VIENNA CIRCLE VIENNA CIRCLE INSTITUTE YEARBOOK [2004] 12 VIENNA CIRCLE INSTITUTE YEARBOOK [2004] 12 Institut ‘Wiener Kreis’ Society for the Advancement of the Scientific World Conception Series-Editor: Friedrich Stadler Director, Institut ‘Wiener Kreis’ and University of Vienna, Austria Advisory Editorial Board: Honorary Consulting Editors: Rudolf Haller, University of Graz, Austria, Coordinator Kurt E. Baier Nancy Cartwright, London School of Economics, UK Francesco Barone Robert S. Cohen, Boston University, USA C.G. Hempel † Wilhelm K. Essler, University of Frankfurt/M., Germany Stephan Kö rner † Kurt Rudolf Fischer, University of Vienna, Austria Henk Mulder † Michael Friedman, University of Indiana, Bloomington, USA Arne Naess Peter Galison, Harvard University, USA Paul Neurath † Adolf Grünbaum, University of Pittsburgh, USA Willard Van Orman Quine † Rainer Hegselmann, University of Bayreuth, Germany Marx W. Wartofsky † Michael Heidelberger, University of Tübingen, Germany Jaakko Hintikka, Boston University, USA Review Editor: Gerald Holton, Harvard University, USA Michael Stöltzner Don Howard, University of Notre Dame, USA Allan S. Janik, University of Innsbruck, Austria Editorial Work/Layout/Production: Richard Jeffrey, Princeton University, USA Hartwig Jobst Andreas Kamlah, University of Osnabrück, Germany Camilla R. Nielsen Eckehart Köhler, University of Vienna, Austria Erich Papp Anne J. Kox, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands Saul A. Kripke, Princeton University, USA Editorial
    [Show full text]
  • Edmund Burke's German Readers at the End of Enlightenment, 1790-1815 Jonathan Allen Green Trinity Hall, University of Cambridg
    Edmund Burke’s German Readers at the End of Enlightenment, 1790-1815 Jonathan Allen Green Trinity Hall, University of Cambridge September 2017 This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Declaration This dissertation is the result of my own work and includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaborations except as declared in the Declaration and specified in the text. All translations, unless otherwise noted or published in anthologies, are my own. It is not substantially the same as any that I have submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for a degree or diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University of similar institution except as declared in the Declaration and specified in the text. I further state that no substantial part of my dissertation has already been submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for any such degree, diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Declaration and specified in the text. It does not exceed the prescribed word limit for the Faculty of History Degree Committee (80,000 words). Statement of Word Count: This dissertation comprises 79,363 words. 1 Acknowledgements Writing this dissertation was a challenge, and I am immensely grateful to the many friends and colleagues who helped me see it to completion. Thanks first of all are due to William O’Reilly, who supervised the start of this research during my MPhil in Political Thought and Intellectual History (2012-2013), and Christopher Meckstroth, who subsequently oversaw my work on this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Bodies: Homo Sacer IV, 2
    The Use of Bodies MERIDIAN Crossing Aesthetics Werner Hamacher Editor Stanford University Press Stanford California 2016 THE USE OF BODIES Homo Sacer IV, 2 Giorgio Agamben Translated by Adam Kotsko Stanford University Press Stanford, California English translation © 2015 by the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. All rights reserved. The Use of Bodies was originally published in Italian in 2014 under the title L’uso dei corpi © 2014, Neri Pozza Editore, Vicenza. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system without the prior written permission of Stanford University Press. Printed in the United States of America on acid-free, archival-quality paper Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Agamben, Giorgio, 1942– author. [Uso dei corpi. English] The use of bodies : Homo sacer IV, 2 / Giorgio Agamben ; translated by Adam Kotsko. pages cm. — (Meridian : crossing aesthetics) “Originally published in Italian in 2014 under the title L’uso dei corpi.” Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-0-8047-9234-9 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN 978-0-8047-9840-2 (pbk. : alk. paper) ISBN 978-0-8047-9861-7 (ebook) 1. Human body (Philosophy) 2. Philosophical anthropology. I. Kotsko, Adam, translator. II. Title. III. Series: Meridian (Stanford, Calif.) B3611.A43U8613 2016 195—dc23 2015032891 A boy from Sparta stole a fox and hid it under his cloak, and because his people, in their foolishness, were more ashamed of a botched robbery than we fear punishment, he let it gnaw through his belly rather than be discovered.
    [Show full text]
  • Appraising Lakatos Vienna Circle Institute Library [2002] 1
    APPRAISING LAKATOS VIENNA CIRCLE INSTITUTE LIBRARY [2002] 1 Institut Wiener Kreis Society for the Advancement of the Scientific World Conception Series-Editor: Friedrich Stadler Director, lnstitut Wiener Kreis and University of Vienna, Austria Advisory Editorial Board: Helga Nowotny, ETH Zurich, Switzerland Nancy Cartwright, London School of Economics, Erhard Oeser, University of Vienna. Austria UK Joelle Proust, Ecole Polytechnique CREA Paris. Robert S. Cohen, Boston University. USA France Wilhelm K. Essler, University of Frankfurt/ M .. Alan Richardson, University of British Columbia, Germany CDN Kurt Rudolf Fischer, University of Vienna, Peter Schuster, University of Vienna, Austria Austria Jan Sebestik, CNRS Paris. France Michael Friedman, University of Indiana, Karl Sigmund, University of Vienna, Austria Bloomington, USA Hans Sluga, University of California at Berkeley, Peter Galison, Harvard University, USA USA Adolf Gri.inbaum, University of Pittsburgh, USA Elliott Sober, University of Wisconsin, USA Rudolf Haller, University of Graz, Austria, Antonia Soulez, Universite de Paris 8, France Rainer Hegselmann, University of Bayreuth. Wolfgang Spohn, University of Konstanz. Germany Germany Michael Heidelberger, University ofTubingen, Christian Thiel, University of Erlangen, Germany Germany Walter Thirri ng, University of Vienna, Austria Jaakko Hintikka, Boston University, USA Thomas E. Uebel, University of Manchester. UK Gerald Holton, Harvard Un iversity, USA Georg Winckler, University of Vienna, Austria Don Howard, University of Notre Dame, USA Ruth Wodak, University of Vienna, Austria Allan S. Janik, University of lnnsbruck. Austria Jan Wolenski, Jagiel/onian University. Cracmr. Richard Jeffrey, Princeton University, USA Poland Andreas Kamiah, University of Osnabruck, Anton Zeilinger, University of Vienna, Austria Germany Eckehart Kohler, University of Vienna, Austria Anne J. Kox, University of Amsterdam, Associate Editor: The Netherlands Michael Stiiltzner Saul A.
    [Show full text]
  • A Linguistic View of Habermas' Theory of Communicative Competence
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societies Nebraska Academy of Sciences 1977 A Linguistic View Of Habermas' Theory Of Communicative Competence Elisabeth Leinfellner Lincoln, NE Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tnas Leinfellner, Elisabeth, "A Linguistic View Of Habermas' Theory Of Communicative Competence" (1977). Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societies. 424. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tnas/424 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Nebraska Academy of Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societiesy b an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. A LINGUISTIC VIEW OF HABERMAS' THEORY OF COMMUNICATIVE COMPETENCE ELISABETH LEINFELLNER 839 South 15th Street Lincoln, Nebraska 68508 Habermas'view of language has been widely discussed in Europe by a little "school daze" joke-Note left on the teacher's and, to some extent, by rhetoricians and philosophers in the United desk: ''Dear Teacher: I have written 'I have gone' a hundred States. Here we will present the linguistic point of view. times, as you have told me. So now I have went home.") Habermas' theory is heavily influenced by concepts taken from But since the competence-perfonnance problem is the respon­ hermeneutics and Habermas' own sociological views. For instance, sibility of the linguist or psycholinguist, one should not blame Habermas uses his concept of "systematic distortion" (i.e. ideological the sociologist Habennas for not having solved it.
    [Show full text]
  • Katherine Arens
    Professor CURRICULUM VITAE University of Texas at Austin Dept of Germanic Studies Katherine Arens EDUCATION 1976-80: Ph.D., German Studies + Humanities Special Programs, Stanford University (degree 1/81) Dissertation: Functionalism and Fin de siècle: Fritz Mauthner's Critique of Language (Supervisor: Kurt Mueller-Vollmer; Committee: Gordon Craig [History], Walter F.W. Lohnes) 1978-79: University of Vienna, Austria 1975-76: A.M., German Studies, Stanford University 1971-75: B.A., Northwestern University, Evanston, IL (Physics and German) PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 1993-date: Research Professor, U of Texas at Austin, Germanic Studies (pre-1998: Languages) -Program in Comparative Literature (full member of graduate faculty) -affiliate, Center for Russian and Eastern European Studies (2002- ) -concurrent zero-time appointment, Center for Women's and Gender Studies (2005-) -affiliate, Center for European Studies (2004-08) -concurrent zero-time appointment, Science, Technology, & Society (unit closed) 1986-93: Associate Professor, U of Texas at Austin, Dept. of Germanic Languages -Program in Comparative Literature 1980-86: Assistant Professor, U of Texas at Austin, Dept of Germanic Languages 1976-80: Teaching Fellow, Stanford University, Department of German Studies and Humanities Special Programs HONORS 2017 Honorary Member, American Association of Teachers of German (elected by association board on national nomination) 2016 Book Prize (Honorable Mention), Center for Austrian Studies (Minneapolis), for Vienna's Dreams of Europe: Thinking Beyond
    [Show full text]
  • Ambiguity of the Sacred
    AMBIGUITY OF THE SACRED PHENOMENOLOGY, POLITICS, AESTHETICS JONNA BORNEMARK & HANS RUIN (EDS.) SÖDERTÖRN PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES is a series connected to the Department of Philosophy at Södertörn University. It publishes monographs and anthologies in philosophy, with a special focus on the Continental-European tradition. It seeks to provide a platform for innovative contemporary philosophical research. The volumes are published mainly in English and Swedish. The series is edited by Marcia Sá Cavalcante Schuback and Hans Ruin. Cover photo: Helene Schmitz, from the series “Sunken gardens” AMBIGUITY OF THE SACRED PHENOMENOLOGY, POLITICS, AESTHETICS SÖDERTÖRN PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES 12 2012 Ambiguity of the Sacred Edited by Jonna Bornemark & Hans Ruin SÖDERTÖRN PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES 12 Södertörn University The Library SE-141 89 Huddinge www.sh.se/publications © The authors Cover image: Helen Schmitz, from the series “Sunken gardens” Graphic Form: Jonathan Robson & Per Lindblom Printed by E-print, Stockholm 2012 Södertörn Philosophical Studies 12 ISSN 1651-6834 Södertörn Academic Studies 49 ISSN 1650-433X ISBN 978-91-86069-47-6 Contents Introduction HANS RUIN & JONNA BORNEMARK 5 Sacredness as a Social Strategy MUNIZ SODRÉ 15 Religion, Religiosity and Political Sacredness Remarks on Muniz Sodré’s Paper MATTIAS MARTINSON 25 You Shall Kill the One you Love Abraham and the Ambiguity of God JAKOB ROGOZINSKI 29 You Shall not Commit Murder The Ambiguity of God and the Character of Moral Responsibility ELENA NAMLI 43 Ambiguities of Immanence Between Stanislas Breton and Louis Althusser (or, Why an Apostle Recycles as an Exemplar of Materialist Subjectivity) WARD BLANTON 49 Strange Crossings Commentary to Ward Blanton HANS RUIN 73 Minimalist Faith, Embodied Messianism The Ambiguity of the Sacred and the Holy BETTINA BERGO 79 Life as Limit-drawing Event Comments on Bergo’s Discussion of Formalism vs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wittgenstein Lectures-2019 Update Cambria
    Updated version: September 2019 James C. Klagge Public and Private Occasions [[p. 331]] Chapter 3: The Wittgenstein Lectures Just as we have a catalogue of Wittgenstein’s papers, it would be useful to have a guide to Wittgenstein’s lectures. It would be useful to know when he gave lectures, where and to whom, and on what topics, and more specifically what he said. Since his lectures, unlike his papers, have no enduring existence, they are harder to study. Nevertheless, we have evidence about his lectures—comments he made in letters, notes he made in preparation, recollections and notes from his listeners and friends, official records and minutes, diary entries, and so forth. Though Wittgenstein nearly always lectured extemporaneously, the lectures were preceded by enormous preparation, and Wittgenstein took them very seriously. As Norman Malcolm has reported (1984, p. 48), Wittgenstein “said that he had always regarded his lectures as a form of publication.” And Casimir Lewy recalled: “Wittgenstein once said to me that ‘to publish’ means ‘to make public’, and that therefore lecturing is a form of publication” (1976, p. xi). Yorick Smythies, who probably attended more of Wittgenstein’s lectures than any other student, wrote the following in a draft of an introduction to a planned publication of Wittgenstein’s lectures (Smythies 2017, xi): Re-reading [these notes], now, after thirty years, I find them more natural, fluent, simple, continuous, expressive, than the remarks contained in Wittgenstein’s so-far published writings. While he was lecturing, he was not able to delete what had been said, or to give to trains of thought more tightness than they were showing themselves to have.
    [Show full text]