DOCSLIB.ORG

Edmund Burke's German Readers at the End of Enlightenment, 1790-1815 Jonathan Allen Green Trinity Hall, University of Cambridg

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Edmund Burke's German Readers at the End of Enlightenment, 1790-1815 Jonathan Allen Green Trinity Hall, University of Cambridg Edmund Burke’s German Readers at the End of Enlightenment, 1790-1815 Jonathan Allen Green Trinity Hall, University of Cambridge September 2017 This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Declaration This dissertation is the result of my own work and includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaborations except as declared in the Declaration and specified in the text. All translations, unless otherwise noted or published in anthologies, are my own. It is not substantially the same as any that I have submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for a degree or diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University of similar institution except as declared in the Declaration and specified in the text. I further state that no substantial part of my dissertation has already been submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for any such degree, diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Declaration and specified in the text. It does not exceed the prescribed word limit for the Faculty of History Degree Committee (80,000 words). Statement of Word Count: This dissertation comprises 79,363 words. 1 Acknowledgements Writing this dissertation was a challenge, and I am immensely grateful to the many friends and colleagues who helped me see it to completion. Thanks first of all are due to William O’Reilly, who supervised the start of this research during my MPhil in Political Thought and Intellectual History (2012-2013), and Christopher Meckstroth, who subsequently oversaw my work on this thesis. More broadly I am grateful to the members of the Cambridge Political Thought group, who taught me what the history of political thought is, how to do it, and why it matters. I am especially indebted to Duncan Kelly and Isaac Nakhimovsky, whose 2013 course on Istvan Hont’s ‘history of the history of political thought’ was extremely helpful for placing my own reading of Burke’s reception within the discipline’s wider historiography, and to the faculty members who advised my research informally: John Robertson, Michael Sonenscher, Sylvana Tomaselli, and Joachim Whaley. Outside of Cambridge, my research brought me into contact with the small (but growing!) cohort of scholars interested in Burke’s German protégés. Richard Bourke (Queen Mary, University of London), Raphaël Cahen (Marseilles), Benedikt Koehler (London), Günther Kronenbitter (Augsburg), and Iwan Michaelangelo-d’Aprile (Potsdam) offered helpful advice and suggestions at various stages of the project. Christopher Clark (Cambridge), Ian Crowe (Burke Society of America), Paul Kerry (Rothermere Institute, Oxford), Klaus Ries (Jena), and Michael Rohrschneider (Cologne) generously invited me to present my research at their workshops and seminars. During my time at the Universitäts- und Stadtbibliothek Köln, Hermann-Joseph Eschbach helped me to navigate Gentz’s Nachlass, and Marlis Herterich (widow of the Gentz researcher Günter Herterich) was kind enough to share some of her late husband’s archival findings with me; my thanks to both of them. Most of all, I am thankful for the Cambridge graduate students, JRFs, and friends who helped me along the way. William Boyce, Hunter Davis, Freddy Foks, Michael Mascindaro, Tom Pye, and Paul Wilford all read chapters in various stages of drafting. Tom Arnold-Forster, Michael Breidenbach, Greg Conti, Ben Hand, Emily Jones, Rhys Jones, Charlotte Johann, Andrew McKenzie-McHarg, Lucian Robinson, Ben Slingo, James Stafford, Hanna Weibye, and Sam Zeitlin offered encouragement and advice throughout the writing process. Whatever merits this dissertation has, it would have been far more imperfect without their help. 2 For my parents 3 Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction 6 1. Zisca’s drum 6 2. Prospectus 12 Chapter 2: Das Edmund Burke-Problem in the history of political thought 18 1. Frieda Braune’s Edmund Burke-Problem 18 2. Shaping the canon 23 3. Competing conservatisms 30 4. Postwar afterlives 38 5. Conclusion 47 Chapter 3: August Wilhelm Rehberg 48 1. Introduction 48 2. Hanoverian contexts 52 3. Burke in Hanover, before the deluge 58 4. Rehberg, Hume, skepticism 66 5. Burke and the pamphlet wars in Germany, 1790-93 73 6. Burke and the Untersuchungen 88 7. Conclusion 99 Chapter 4: Friedrich Gentz 102 1. Introduction 102 2. Translating Burke’s Reflections 109 3. Gentz’s Burke in the Spätaufklärung 119 4. Gentz’s Burke contra Kant 126 5. Gentz, Burke, perpetual peace 144 6. Conclusion 160 Chapter 5: Adam Müller 166 1. Introduction 166 2. Prussian beginnings 175 3. Der Gegensatz against Fichte 184 4. Burke, tradition, ‘mediating history’ 195 5. Müller’s Elemente der Staatskunst 206 6. Conclusion 212 Chapter 6: Conclusion 216 Bibliography 222 4 We shall have to think away distinctions that seem to us as clear as the sunshine; we must think ourselves back into a twilight. – F.W. Maitland1 1 F.W. Maitland, Township and Borough (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1898), p. 11. 5 Chapter 1: Introduction I. Zisca’s drum Shortly before he died, Edmund Burke (1730-1797) begged to be forgotten. By 1796, he was arguably the most famous politician in England. Over the last decades of his life, Burke had made his name as one of Parliament’s most jealous defenders of the British Constitution – a vociferous opponent of royal prerogative, a critic of ministerial corruption in the Empire, a friend of American Independence and the cause of religious toleration, and, in recent years, Europe’s most famous (or infamous) denunciator of the French Revolution. But now, at the end of his life, Burke wished only to be left in peace. ‘Why will they not let me remain in obscurity and inaction?’ he complained of his relentless critics: Are they apprehensive, that if an atom of me remains, the [revolutionary] sect has something to fear? Must I be annihilated, lest, like old John Zisca’s, my skin might be made into a drum, to animate Europe to eternal battle, against a tyranny that threatens to overwhelm all Europe, and all the human race? … ‘Leave me, oh leave me to repose!’1 In the years and decades after his death in July 1797, his compatriots were largely obliging. For a brief period, he was eulogized in the British press as a talented orator and a historically significant figure; his erstwhile colleagues recalled his fiery personality and his strength of principle; and posthumous writers debated the alleged ‘inconsistencies’ of his career.2 But afterwards, he was set aside. No political party took up Burke’s mantle in the years after his death, and early nineteenth-century political theorists roundly ignored him (presumably on the grounds that an ‘inconsistent’ mind like Burke’s would not reward careful scrutiny).3 As 1 Burke, Letter to a Noble Lord [Feb. 1796]; in The Writings and Speeches of Edmund Burke [hereinafter W&S], ed. Paul Langford et al., 9 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970-2015), vol. 9, pt. 1, pp. 145-87, at pp. 147-8, italics removed from orig. Burke alludes here to the Hussite general Jan Žižka (1360-1424) who, according to legend, ordered that if killed, he was to be flayed and his skin made into a drum so that he could continue inspire his army in battle. Burke’s plea for ‘repose’ is a quotation from Thomas Gray’s Descent of Odin (1768). 2 This question of ‘consistency’ was the leitmotif of Burke’s first biography: see Robert Bisset, Life of Edmund Burke…, 2 vols. (London: Cawthorn, 1798). 3 Cf. James Sack, ‘The Memory of Pitt and the Memory of Burke: English Conservatism Confronts its Past, 1806-1829’, The Historical Journal, vol. 30, no. 3 (Sept., 1987): pp. 623-40; Stefan Collini, Donald Winch, and John Burrow, That Noble Science of Politics: A Study in Nineteenth-Century Intellectual History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983), passim. Burke had admirers 6 Chapter 1: Introduction Emily Jones has recently shown, it was not until the 1880s and ’90s – amidst heated debates over Irish Home Rule and in the face of a growing socialist movement – that Burke’s Tory- Unionist admirers christened him the founder of modern conservatism, a label he still wears today.4 If it took nearly a century for Burke to regain relevance in Britain, his canonization in America was even more belated. Though he was sporadically invoked by nineteenth-century politicians to warn of the dangers of revolutionary violence, this did not amount to a confrontation with his ideas: before the Cold War, Burke was more a badge to be worn than a mind to be understood.5 This changed in the 1940s, when an enterprising coterie of anti- communists, neo-Thomists, and Christian traditionalists – America’s so-called ‘new conservatives’ – discovered Burke and situated him as the founder of their shared creed.6 For Russell Kirk, Peter Viereck, and Frances Canavan, Burke’s campaign against the politicized atheism of the French revolutionaries paralleled their own war against the threat of Stalinism abroad and, more subtly, of moral exhaustion and ennui at home.7 This Cold War reception forced political scientists to circle back to Burke’s thought, in an effort to make sense of the new conservatives who imagined themselves his progeny. Like their Victorian predecessors, American thinkers like Samuel Huntington soon uncovered a stable ‘Burkeian ideology’ of conservatism – a coherent philosophical tradition stretching from the 1790s to the present.8 On the European mainland as well, there failed to materialize any serious reception of Burke’s political thought in the early-nineteenth century. His political thought was attractive among the English Romantics, but here his influence was aesthetic, not political: on this reception, see Alfred Cobban, Edmund Burke and the Revolt against the Eighteenth Century: A Study of the Political and Social Thinking of Burke, Wordsworth, Coleridge and Southey (London: Allen & Unwinn, 1929).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unjust Law As a Justification for Civil Disobedience
    Mgbakoigba: Journal of African Studies, Volume 4, 2015. UNJUST LAW AS A JUSTIFICATION FOR CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE Arinze Agbanusi Department of Philosophy Nnamdi Azikiwe University Awka. Introduction Laws are bodies of rules for human conduct. They are meant to guide human actions, indicating those that are permitted or accepted and those that are prohibited, which performance attracts one form of punishment or the other. Laws are supposed to guide the behavior of citizens of a nation. A nation without laws is like a vehicle without wheels. Without laws people cannot live peacefully together as there will be the problem of reconciling conflicting human rights. As Thomas Hobbes pointed out in his theory of the state, when man was alone, there was no need for laws. The need for laws was necessitated by the increase in human population, to help reconcile naturally conflicting rights of different individuals. It is therefore expected that citizens should obey laws, to avoid an anarchical state where jungle justice (the principle of survival of the fittest) operates. According to Hobbes, the commonwealth was formed because men had a foresight of their own preservation, and thus had to find a way of averting that miserable condition of war and strife which are natural consequences of ever conflicting human rights. For John Locke, the main aim of forming the commonwealth (government) is the preservation of the „Property‟ of Citizens. Since the commonwealth and laws were created for the noble sake of the preservation of life and property, through the avoidance of war and uncertainties; it behooves on all citizens to obey the laws of the state or nation.
    [Show full text]
  • STEPHEN H. BROWNE Liberal Arts Professor of Communication Arts & Sciences the Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA (814) 865-3461 [email protected]
    STEPHEN H. BROWNE Liberal Arts Professor of Communication Arts & Sciences The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA (814) 865-3461 [email protected] Education Ph.D. University of Wisconsin, 1987 M.A. Colorado State University, 1982 B.S. University of Oregon, 1979 Employment History Liberal Arts Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 2016- Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences, 2000-2016 Associate Professor of Speech Communication, The Pennsylvania State University, 1993-2000 Assistant Professor of Rhetoric and Communication, University of California, Davis, 1992-1993 Assistant Professor of Speech Communication, The Pennsylvania State University, 1987-1992 Assistant Professor of Speech Communication, California Polytechnic State University, 1986- 1987 Select Grants and Awards Liberal Arts Professor, 2016 Distinguished Scholar, National Communication Association, 2015 College of the Liberal Arts Award for Excellence in Teaching, 2006 Class of 1933 Award for Distinction in the Humanities, 2003 Diamond Anniversary Book Award, National Communication Association, 2000 Institute for Arts and Humanistic Studies Grant, 1999 Research and Graduate Studies Office Internal Award, 1994-95 National Endowment for the Humanities: Travel to Collections Program, 1992 Karl Wallace Memorial Award, Speech Communication Association, 1990 Institute for Arts and Humanistic Studies Grant, 1989 Current Editorial Service Series Co-Editor, Rhetoric, Deliberation and Democracy Penn State University Press Research
    [Show full text]
  • The George Wright Forum
    The George Wright Forum The GWS Journal of Parks, Protected Areas & Cultural Sites volume 34 number 3 • 2017 Society News, Notes & Mail • 243 Announcing the Richard West Sellars Fund for the Forum Jennifer Palmer • 245 Letter from Woodstock Values We Hold Dear Rolf Diamant • 247 Civic Engagement, Shared Authority, and Intellectual Courage Rebecca Conard and John H. Sprinkle, Jr., guest editors Dedication•252 Planned Obsolescence: Maintenance of the National Park Service’s History Infrastructure John H. Sprinkle, Jr. • 254 Shining Light on Civil War Battlefield Preservation and Interpretation: From the “Dark Ages” to the Present at Stones River National Battlefield Angela Sirna • 261 Farming in the Sweet Spot: Integrating Interpretation, Preservation, and Food Production at National Parks Cathy Stanton • 275 The Changing Cape: Using History to Engage Coastal Residents in Community Conversations about Climate Change David Glassberg • 285 Interpreting the Contributions of Chinese Immigrants in Yosemite National Park’s History Yenyen F. Chan • 299 Nānā I Ke Kumu (Look to the Source) M. Melia Lane-Kamahele • 308 A Perilous View Shelton Johnson • 315 (continued) Civic Engagement, Shared Authority, and Intellectual Courage (cont’d) Some Challenges of Preserving and Exhibiting the African American Experience: Reflections on Working with the National Park Service and the Carter G. Woodson Home National Historic Site Pero Gaglo Dagbovie • 323 Exploring American Places with the Discovery Journal: A Guide to Co-Creating Meaningful Interpretation Katie Crawford-Lackey and Barbara Little • 335 Indigenous Cultural Landscapes: A 21st-Century Landscape-scale Conservation and Stewardship Framework Deanna Beacham, Suzanne Copping, John Reynolds, and Carolyn Black • 343 A Framework for Understanding Off-trail Trampling Impacts in Mountain Environments Ross Martin and David R.
    [Show full text]
  • David Suchoff Family Resemblances: Ludwig Wittgenstein As a Jewish Philosopher the Admonition to Silence with Which Wittgenstein
    David Suchoff Family Resemblances: Ludwig Wittgenstein as a Jewish Philosopher The admonition to silence with which Wittgenstein ended the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (1922) also marks the starting point for the emer- gence of his Jewish philosophical voice. Karl Kraus provides an instructive contrast: as a writer well known to Wittgenstein, Kraus’s outspoken and aggressive ridicule of “jüdeln” or “mauscheln” –the actual or alleged pronunciation of German with a Jewish or Yiddish accent – defined a “self-fashioning” of Jewish identity – from German and Hebrew in this case – that modeled false alternatives in philosophic terms.1 Kraus pre- sented Wittgenstein with an either-or choice between German and Jewish identity, while engaging in a witty but also unwitting illumination of the interplay between apparently exclusive alternatives that were linguistically influenced by the other’s voice. As Kraus became a touchstone for Ger- man Jewish writers from Franz Kafka to Walter Benjamin and Gershom Scholem, he also shed light on the situation that allowed Wittgenstein to develop his own non-essentialist notion of identity, as the term “family resemblance” emerged from his revaluation of the discourse around Judaism. This transition from The False Prison, as David Pears calls Wittgenstein’s move from the Tractatus to the Philosophical Investiga- tions, was also a transformation of the opposition between German and Jewish “identities,” and a recovery of the multiple differences from which such apparently stable entities continually draw in their interconnected forms of life.2 “I’ll teach you differences,” the line from King Lear that Wittgenstein mentioned to M. O’C. Drury as “not bad” as a “motto” for the Philo- sophical Investigations, in this way represents Wittgenstein’s assertion of a German Jewish philosophic position.
    [Show full text]
  • District of Columbia Inventory of Historic Sites Street Address Index
    DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA INVENTORY OF HISTORIC SITES STREET ADDRESS INDEX UPDATED TO OCTOBER 31, 2014 NUMBERED STREETS Half Street, SW 1360 ........................................................................................ Syphax School 1st Street, NE between East Capitol Street and Maryland Avenue ................ Supreme Court 100 block ................................................................................. Capitol Hill HD between Constitution Avenue and C Street, west side ............ Senate Office Building and M Street, southeast corner ................................................ Woodward & Lothrop Warehouse 1st Street, NW 320 .......................................................................................... Federal Home Loan Bank Board 2122 ........................................................................................ Samuel Gompers House 2400 ........................................................................................ Fire Alarm Headquarters between Bryant Street and Michigan Avenue ......................... McMillan Park Reservoir 1st Street, SE between East Capitol Street and Independence Avenue .......... Library of Congress between Independence Avenue and C Street, west side .......... House Office Building 300 block, even numbers ......................................................... Capitol Hill HD 400 through 500 blocks ........................................................... Capitol Hill HD 1st Street, SW 734 .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Carl Schmitt and the Critique of Lawfare
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Case Western Reserve University School of Law Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law Volume 43 | Issue 1 2010 Carl Schmitt nda the Critique of Lawfare David Luban Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation David Luban, Carl Schmitt na d the Critique of Lawfare, 43 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 457 (2010) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil/vol43/iss1/26 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. File: Luban 2 Created on: 12/27/2010 2:26:00 PM Last Printed: 4/5/2011 8:10:00 PM CARL SCHMITT AND THE CRITIQUE OF LAWFARE David Luban “Lawfare” is the use of law as a weapon of war against a military adversary. Lawfare critics complain that self-proclaimed “humanitarians” are really engaged in the partisan and political abuse of law—lawfare. This paper turns the mirror on lawfare critics themselves, and argues that the critique of lawfare is no less abusive and political than the alleged lawfare it attacks. Radical lawfare critics view humanitarian law with suspicion, as nothing more than an instrument used by weak adversaries against strong military powers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Method of Antinomies: Oakeshott and Others Others and Oakeshott Antinomies: of Method the VOLUME 6 | ISSUE 1 + 2 2018 6 | ISSUE VOLUME
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Philosophy Faculty Publications Philosophy 2018 The ethoM d of Antinomies: Oakeshott nda Others Stephen Turner University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/phi_facpub Scholar Commons Citation Turner, Stephen, "The eM thod of Antinomies: Oakeshott nda Others" (2018). Philosophy Faculty Publications. 309. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/phi_facpub/309 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Philosophy at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Method of Antinomies: Oakeshott and Others STEPHEN TURNER Email: [email protected] Web: http://philosophy.usf.edu/faculty/sturner/ Abstract: Michael Oakeshott employed a device of argument and analysis that appears in a number of other thinkers, where it is given the name “antinomies.” These differ from binary oppositions or contradictories in that the two poles are bound to- gether. In this discussion, the nature of this binding is explored in detail, in large part in relation to Oakeshott’s own usages, such as his discussion of the relation of faith and skepticism, between collective goal-oriented associations and those based on contract, and between a legal regime based on neutral rules and one oriented to policy goals . Other examples might include Weber’s distinction between the politics of intention and the politics of responsibility. Moreover, such ambiguous concepts as “rights,” have antinomic interpretations. In each of these cases, the full realization of one ideal led, in practice, to consequenc- es associated with the other: in political practice, neither polar ideal was realizable without concessions to the other.
    [Show full text]
  • The Capitol Dome
    THE CAPITOL DOME The Capitol in the Movies John Quincy Adams and Speakers of the House Irish Artists in the Capitol Complex Westward the Course of Empire Takes Its Way A MAGAZINE OF HISTORY PUBLISHED BY THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL HISTORICAL SOCIETYVOLUME 55, NUMBER 22018 From the Editor’s Desk Like the lantern shining within the Tholos Dr. Paula Murphy, like Peart, studies atop the Dome whenever either or both America from the British Isles. Her research chambers of Congress are in session, this into Irish and Irish-American contributions issue of The Capitol Dome sheds light in all to the Capitol complex confirms an import- directions. Two of the four articles deal pri- ant artistic legacy while revealing some sur- marily with art, one focuses on politics, and prising contributions from important but one is a fascinating exposé of how the two unsung artists. Her research on this side of can overlap. “the Pond” was supported by a USCHS In the first article, Michael Canning Capitol Fellowship. reveals how the Capitol, far from being only Another Capitol Fellow alumnus, John a palette for other artist’s creations, has been Busch, makes an ingenious case-study of an artist (actor) in its own right. Whether as the historical impact of steam navigation. a walk-on in a cameo role (as in Quiz Show), Throughout the nineteenth century, steam- or a featured performer sharing the marquee boats shared top billing with locomotives as (as in Mr. Smith Goes to Washington), the the most celebrated and recognizable motif of Capitol, Library of Congress, and other sites technological progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Franz Mehring
    KARL MARX THE STORY OF HIS LIFE - BY Franz Mehring .. wrTH ILLUSTRATIONS AND FACSIMILE REPRODUCTIONS, NOTES BY THE AUTHOR, AN APPENDIX PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF EDUARD FUCHS ON THE BASIS OF THE RESEARCHES OF THE MARX•I!.NGELS INSTITUTE, A BIBLIOGRAPHY AND AN INDEX TRANSLATED BY EDWARD FITZGERALD LONDON GEORGE ALLEN & UNWIN LTD 40 MUSEUM STREET THIS BOOK IS THE AUTHORISED ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF THE GERMAN VOLUME : ' KARL MARX : GESCHICHTE SEINES LEBENS ', BY FRANZ MEHRING ENGLISH EDITION FIRST PUBLISHED 1936 SECOND IMPRESSION 1948 MADE AND PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN BY BUTLER AND TANNER LTD., FROME AND LONDON TO CLARA ZETKIN TRANSLATOR'S PREFACE THE author of this biography was born in 1846 in Pomerania of a well-to-do middle-class family. He studied at the universities of Berlin and Leipzig, taking the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the latter. From the beginning his leanings were democratic and liberal, and when the time came for him to submit himself to the stupidities of the Prussian drill sergeant he left Prussia and went to live in Leipzig, which in those days was " foreign territory ". This deliberate revolt caused the breaking off of relations between him and his family. Whilst still a young man he began to take an active part in public life and in the political struggles of the day. At the age of 25 he was a member of the 1 small band of democrats led by Guido Weiss and Johann Jacoby which had sufficient courage to protest openly against the annexation of Alsace-Lorraine by Bismarck after the Franco­ Prussian War.
    [Show full text]
  • The Method of Antinomies: Oakeshott and Others Others and Oakeshott Antinomies: of Method the VOLUME 6 | ISSUE 1 + 2 2018 6 | ISSUE VOLUME
    The Method of Antinomies: Oakeshott and Others STEPHEN TURNER Email: [email protected] Web: http://philosophy.usf.edu/faculty/sturner/ Abstract: Michael Oakeshott employed a device of argument and analysis that appears in a number of other thinkers, where it is given the name “antinomies.” These differ from binary oppositions or contradictories in that the two poles are bound to- gether. In this discussion, the nature of this binding is explored in detail, in large part in relation to Oakeshott’s own usages, such as his discussion of the relation of faith and skepticism, between collective goal-oriented associations and those based on contract, and between a legal regime based on neutral rules and one oriented to policy goals . Other examples might include Weber’s distinction between the politics of intention and the politics of responsibility. Moreover, such ambiguous concepts as “rights,” have antinomic interpretations. In each of these cases, the full realization of one ideal led, in practice, to consequenc- es associated with the other: in political practice, neither polar ideal was realizable without concessions to the other. But these features are rooted in the deep history of institutions. They are contingent, not philosophical. They nevertheless preclude con- ventional approaches to political theory. Keywords: Michael Oakeshott, antinomies, meta-politics, democratic theory, Max Weber, Hans Morgenthau, genealogy 54 COSMOS + TAXIS COSMOS Several of Michael Oakeshott’s writings, including On vision of politics is different from relativism in any simple Human Conduct ([1975] 1991), employ an argumentative sense of this term. It is specifically distinct from, and op- device that is shared with several other twentieth century posed to, the idea that there can be an ideological “solu- thinkers, but which has not received much attention on its tion” to the antinomies in question.
    [Show full text]
  • Montesquieu, Methodological Pluralism and Comparative Constitutional Law 481
    Montesquieu, Methodological Pluralism and Comparative Constitutional Law 481 Montesquieu, Methodological Pluralism and Comparative Constitutional Law Lorenzo Zucca* Montesquieu’s lessons for modern comparative constitutional law – The Spirit of the Laws – The textual bias of normative constitutionalism – The utility of other disci- plines to comparative constitutional law – Constitutions as more than mere texts Introduction Modern comparative constitutional law begins in Esfahan, the old capital of Iran, in a majestic seraglio, where some of the most beautiful women are held captive. Uzbek, an Iranian prince, set out for a trip to Europe. He travels to Qom, the holy city, then to Tabriz. He stops for a while in Turkey and embarks in Smyrna on the way to Livorno. Then he quickly arrives in Paris, the centre of modern Europe. From there, Uzbek and Rica, a close friend, report back on European laws, habits and culture from the perspective of two Persian observers. There are two impor- tant, albeit conflicting, insights in Montesquieu’s Persian Letters. First, we can im- prove the understanding of our society by adopting an external viewpoint. In this case, Montesquieu wears the clothes of two Persian visitors, Uzbek and Rica. Through this fiction, he can critically report on a number of interesting aspects of contemporary France. Montesquieu stresses a second point: self-understanding through comparison is limited, as we always tend to excuse our own habits more than we criticise them. Uzbek, for example, sees many weaknesses in the French political and cultural system, but tends to justify his position of slave owner and incarcerator of women back home.
    [Show full text]
  • Germany from Luther to Bismarck
    University of California at San Diego HIEU 132 GERMANY FROM LUTHER TO BISMARCK Fall quarter 2009 #658659 Class meets Tuesdays and Thursdays from 2 until 3:20 in Warren Lecture Hall 2111 Professor Deborah Hertz Humanities and Social Science Building 6024 534 5501 Readers of the papers and examinations: Ms Monique Wiesmueller, [email protected]. Office Hours: Wednesdays 1:30 to 3 and by appointment CONTACTING THE PROFESSOR Please do not contact me by e-mail, but instead speak to me before or after class or on the phone during my office hour. I check the mailbox inside of our web site regularly. In an emergency you may contact the assistant to the Judaic Studies Program, Ms. Dorothy Wagoner at [email protected]; 534 4551. CLASSROOM ETIQUETTE. Please do not eat in class, drinks are acceptable. Please note that you should have your laptops, cell phones, and any other devices turned off during class. Students do too much multi-tasking for 1 the instructor to monitor. Try the simple beauty of a notebook and a pen. If so many students did not shop during class, you could enjoy the privilege of taking notes on your laptops. Power point presentations in class are a gift to those who attend and will not be available on the class web site. Attendance is not taken in class. Come to learn and to discuss. Class texts: All of the texts have been ordered with Groundworks Books in the Old Student Center and have been placed on Library Reserve. We have a systematic problem that Triton Link does not list the Groundworks booklists, but privileges the Price Center Bookstore.
    [Show full text]