Yonkers Helping Those Who Need It This Thanksgiving
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
New York City Comprehensive Waterfront Plan
NEW YORK CITY CoMPREHENSWE WATERFRONT PLAN Reclaiming the City's Edge For Public Discussion Summer 1992 DAVID N. DINKINS, Mayor City of New lVrk RICHARD L. SCHAFFER, Director Department of City Planning NYC DCP 92-27 NEW YORK CITY COMPREHENSIVE WATERFRONT PLAN CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMA RY 1 INTRODUCTION: SETTING THE COURSE 1 2 PLANNING FRA MEWORK 5 HISTORICAL CONTEXT 5 LEGAL CONTEXT 7 REGULATORY CONTEXT 10 3 THE NATURAL WATERFRONT 17 WATERFRONT RESOURCES AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE 17 Wetlands 18 Significant Coastal Habitats 21 Beaches and Coastal Erosion Areas 22 Water Quality 26 THE PLAN FOR THE NATURAL WATERFRONT 33 Citywide Strategy 33 Special Natural Waterfront Areas 35 4 THE PUBLIC WATERFRONT 51 THE EXISTING PUBLIC WATERFRONT 52 THE ACCESSIBLE WATERFRONT: ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES 63 THE PLAN FOR THE PUBLIC WATERFRONT 70 Regulatory Strategy 70 Public Access Opportunities 71 5 THE WORKING WATERFRONT 83 HISTORY 83 THE WORKING WATERFRONT TODAY 85 WORKING WATERFRONT ISSUES 101 THE PLAN FOR THE WORKING WATERFRONT 106 Designation Significant Maritime and Industrial Areas 107 JFK and LaGuardia Airport Areas 114 Citywide Strategy fo r the Wo rking Waterfront 115 6 THE REDEVELOPING WATER FRONT 119 THE REDEVELOPING WATERFRONT TODAY 119 THE IMPORTANCE OF REDEVELOPMENT 122 WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT ISSUES 125 REDEVELOPMENT CRITERIA 127 THE PLAN FOR THE REDEVELOPING WATERFRONT 128 7 WATER FRONT ZONING PROPOSAL 145 WATERFRONT AREA 146 ZONING LOTS 147 CALCULATING FLOOR AREA ON WATERFRONTAGE loTS 148 DEFINITION OF WATER DEPENDENT & WATERFRONT ENHANCING USES -
Board of Commissioners of the NYC Dept of Public Parks
• DO()UMENT No. 23. BOARD OF THE DEP ARTlIENT OF PUBLIC PARKS. MAY 2, 1871. The President presented a .certined .copy of an act entitled "An act relative to the improvement of certain portions of the counties of vVestchester and New York, including provisions for .communication between said counties, and for improving the navigation of Harlem river and Spuyten Duyvil creek." Ordered, That said act be laid on the table and printed in document form. GEO. M. V AN NORT, Olerk. • Chap. 534. AN ACT relative to the impt'ovement of certain portions of the counties of Westchester and New York, including provisions for communication between said counties, and for improving the navigation of Harlem river and Spny~en Dnyvil creek. Passed April 15, 1871; three fifths being present. The People of the State of New Ym'/c, represented in Senate and A8sembly, do enact as follow8 : SECTION 1. It shall be the duty of the board of commissioners of the department of public parks of the city of New York, to cause a proper survey to be made of all that part of the county of "Vestchester lying south of the southerly line' of the village of Y OIIkers, and a line in continuation thereof eastwardly to Hutchinson river or creek, and including that part of said county lying south of said line and west of said river or creek, or the westerly boundary line of the town of Pelham to Long Island sound, and to devise and prepare maps, plans and pro files embracing and showing such changes in the location, 'width, courses, windings, and grades of the streets, avenues, and -
Yonkers' History
YONKERS’ HISTORY Village History & Economy Was Built Upon the River: The Hudson River and its rich water resources play prominently in the settlement history, social development, economic health and stability of the City of Yonkers. SETTLEMENT Early Role of the Native Americans - The Algonquin Native Americans were some of the earliest settlers of Yonkers. Clustered in a village at the intersection (confluence) of two waterways called the Muhheakantuck (or Shatemuc) and the Neperah. They called their village ‘Nappeckamack’ which meant either ‘trap fishing place’ or ‘rapid water settlement’. Both translations focus on the importance of the water, and its food supply, to the tribe. Today these same two waterways continue to flow in the area, but we know them now as the Hudson and the Saw Mill Rivers. This location met many of the settlement needs of the Native Americans, including: • Protection from attack – shelter – good visibility • Rich food sources from fish, nuts, small animals • Fresh water and • Ready transit opportunities either on foot or by canoe Henry Hudson: The Native people’s settlement needs were the same as those the Europeans looked for in selecting their settlement locations. In the fall of 1609 Henry Hudson sailed the “Half Moon” up the river that would later bear his name, in search of the Northwest Passage. He stopped at Yonkers to trade with the Native people. He noted the Native American settlement, its excellent location and resources. Records show he obtained oysters from the local tribe. Hudson claimed the Hudson River for the Dutch. The Dutch & De Jonkeer - Adriaen van der Donck was a young lawyer working for the Dutch West India Company. -
Description of the New York City District
DESCRIPTION OF THE NEW YORK CITY DISTRICT. -By F. J. H. Merrill, N. H. Dartoii, Arthur Hollick, B. D. Salisbury, li. E. Dodge, Bailey Willis, and H. A. Pressey. GENERAL GEOGRAPHY OF THE DISTRICT. By Richard E. Dodge and Bailey Willis. Position. The district described in tins folio is Gedney, and Main channels. Ambrose and Swash Harlem River and Spuyten Duyvil Creek the Coastal Plain in general are low peninsulas sepa bounded by the meridians of 78° 45' and 74° 15' channels have a least depth of 3-J- fathoms, while water is but 2 to 3^ fathoms deep. rated by estuaries, in which the tide ebbs and west longitude from Greenwich and the parallels Gedney and Main channels are nowhere less than Newark Bay is an extensive water body, but it flows. These peninsulas are composed of beds of of 40° 30' and 41° north latitude. It covers one- 5 fathoms deep. Within the bar the Lower Bay i is not available for sea-going commerce, as the clay, sand, and gravel, or mixtures of these mate quarter of a square degree, equivalent, in this is from 4 to 12 fathoms deep well out from shore, depth is but 2 fathoms or less, except in a little rials constituting loam, and are extensively devel latitude, to 905.27 square miles. The map is but toward the New Jersey and Staten Island j channel near the outlet connecting with the Kill oped in Maryland, Delaware, and New Jersey. divided into four atlas sheets, called the Paterson, shores the water shoals to 3 fathoms or less over \ van Kull. -
Hudson River Valley Greenway Link Technical Memorandum #4 Task #4 Final Report Research
NEW YORK METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COUNCIL Hudson River Valley Greenway Link Technical Memorandum #4 Task #4 Final Report Research October 28, 2009 Submitted By: with: Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 1 A. CORRIDORS TO BE ANALYZED IN FURTHER DETAIL 5 1. All Waterfront Corridor 5 a. Manhattan Segments 5 b. Spuyten Duyvil Railroad Bridge 7 c. Bronx Segment 8 d. Yonkers Segments 10 e. Existing Waterfront Uses 18 f. Existing Waterfront Access Points/Trip Attractors 22 g. Potential/Desired Waterfront Access Points 24 h. Related Yonkers Waterfront Development Projects 26 2. Inland Corridors 28 a. Manhattan Corridors 28 b. Inland Harlem River Crossings 30 c. Bronx Corridors 32 d. Yonkers Corridors 38 e. Inland Scenic Points 44 f. Inland Trip Attractors 44 B. CORRIDORS TO BE ELIMINATED FROM FURTHER CONSIDERATION 47 Hudson River Valley Greenway Link Task 4 Research INTRODUCTION The primary goal of the Hudson River Valley Greenway Link project is to align a north/south corridor linking the Old Croton Aqueduct (OCA) Trail in Yonkers with the Hudson River Greenway along the Hudson River at Dyckman Street in Upper Manhattan. In order to begin the process of identifying a preferred corridor, a number of potential alignments have been identified as part of Task 4. These alignments are described herein and will be analyzed in further detail in Task 6. The goals and objectives outlined in the Task 3 deliverable state a desire for a route that provides for both recreational as well as utilitarian trips. The alternatives described for further analysis are defined to emphasize the link’s function as a greenway, connecting to nature and the waterfront. -
Of New York City's Parks and Great Gull Island
Natural History of New York City’s Parks And Great Gull Island Transactions of the Linnaean Society of New York Volume X New York City September 2007 ii Linnaean Transactions iii Natural History of New York City’s Parks and Great Gull Island. In a collaboration aimed at highlighting the natural history of New York City Transactions of the Linnaean Society of New York, Volume X area parks at the turn of this century, these Transactions were a joint endeavor of the Linnaean Society of New York, the National Parks Conservation Association, and City of New York Department of Parks & Recreation. Linnaean Society of New York 15 West 77th Street New York NY 10024 Book Design by DonnaClaireDesign, Seattle WA Printed by Linnaean Society of New York Front cover photograph of an American Kestrel at Floyd Bennett Field, 2006, by Ardith Bondi. Back cover photograph of Monarch butterfly on Goldenrod, Gateway National Recreation Area by Alexander R. Brash. City of New York Parks & Recreation ISSN: 0075-9708 © 2007 The Linnaean Society of New York New York City National Parks Conservation Association September 2007 City of New York Parks & Recreation iv Linnaean Transactions v The Linnaean Society of New York Contents The Linnaean Society of New York, organized in 1878, is the second oldest American ornithological society. Regular meetings of the Society are held on the second and fourth Tuesdays of each month from September to May, inclusive. Informal meetings are held once a month during June, July, and August. All meetings are open to the public and are usually held at the American Museum of Natural History. -
Open the PDF: New York Before the Europeans
King of the Forest Manhattan Burning The American chestnut As in many of the was the largest tree forests of the northeast, in the forests that were the Lenape managed SHORAKAPOK Mannahatta’s most their environment on CAMP widespread ecosystem— Mannahatta by controlled MUSCOOTA CAMP MOUNT WASHINGTON some were likely 120 feet burning. Much of the tall and four feet wide. forest was burned HENRY HUDSON’S SHIP ATTACKED (There are few American regularly. The Harlem chestnuts left on the plain seems to have been LAST WOLF SHOT East Coast, the result of kept open by regular a blight first noticed at burning, probably for use the Bronx Zoo in 1904.) as a hunting ground. HARLEM SAVANNAH, MAINTAINED Fort George, currently Battery Park, A 1768 view from the West Village, looking An engraving of the Collect Pond and UNQUENCHABLE SPRING BY LENAPE FIRE in the early days of British control. Trinity south over the Sand Hills. (The palm tree was added Bayard’s Mount, circa 1798. Church is to the left. by an imaginative illustrator.) The city proper is in the distance. Deep Waters Contact Spring Is Here Hunter and Hunted The Collect Pond, as much as On September 12, 1609, Aaron Burr’s Manhattan Water In Mannahatta as everywhere 70 feet deep, was the largest Henry Hudson, a British Company commercialized in the northeastern forest, body of freshwater on the captain sailing for the Dutch this spring near the corner of wolves were the dominant island, and was a center of East India Company in Broadway and Spring Street. -
C:\Documents and Settings\Nick\Desktop\2006\COVER06.Wpd
INTERSTATE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION A TRI-STATE WATER AND AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 2006 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE INTERSTATE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION Formerly the INTERSTATE SANITATION COMMISSION INTERSTATE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION COMMISSIONERS NEW YORK CONNECTICUT Judith L. Baron John Atkin Chairperson Vice Chair Gerard J. Kassar Richard Blumenthal Treasurer J. Robert Galvin, M.D., M.P.H. Donna B. Gerstle Regina McCarthy Denise M. Sheehan Patricia M. P. Sesto Rose Trentman NEW JERSEY Frank A. Pecci Vice Chair Lisa P. Jackson Fred M. Jacobs, M.D., J.D. John M. Scagnelli *** ** * Howard Golub Executive Secretary Boris Rukovets Assistant Secretary Eileen D. Millett Counsel INTERSTATE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION STAFF Howard Golub Executive Director and Chief Engineer Boris Rukovets Assistant Executive Director and Assistant Chief Engineer Eileen D. Millett General Counsel Engineering Laboratory Peter L. Sattler Pradyot Patnaik Nicholas S. Protopsaltis Evelyn R. Powers Brian J. Mitchell Inna Golberg Kristen J. Barshatzky Field Investigation Administrative William M. McCormack Carmen L. Leon Caitlyn P. Nichols Elizabeth M. Morgan Bonnie P. Hickey Fay L. Lau Gillian M. Spencer Kristin L. Titmas STATEMENT OF THE CHAIRPERSON OF THE INTERSTATE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION As I near the end of my second term as Chairperson of the Interstate Environmental Commission, I look back with pride and see the environmental progress we have achieved in virtually all of our programs. Being Chairperson of the sole environmental agency in the Tri-State Area with both regulatory and enforcement powers is both a great honor and a great responsibility. It is incumbent upon us to make clear that it is the IEC’s responsibility to encourage and promote interstate cooperation, and to stay fully informed on all matters and issues concerning the quality of our interstate waters. -
Where Did the Manhattan “Purchase” Take Place?
The Native Place of Manhattan: Where Did the Manhattan “Purchase” Take Place? By Peter Douglas Doubtless because of paucity of facts, numerous myths and misapprehensions have developed around the so- called Dutch “purchase” of Manhattan. Discussed below is just one of these hazy areas: where did it take place? While it is generally agreed now that it was Peter Minuit who instigated the acquisition of Manhattan, who actually participated, both on the Dutch and native sides, is unclear. Similarly, the location of this famous transaction is not known. Two have been proposed. One, and by far Peter Minuit the more likely, is at the southern tip of Manhattan, at Peter Minuit Plaza, where South and Whitehall Streets meet near South Ferry and Battery Park, or perhaps the space in front of the Custom House in the Bowling Green area. Being close to the original settlement on Nut Island and in the rudimentary town on Manhattan, this location would certainly have been convenient. While no confirmation exists in any record, it would have been a very handy venue for such a meeting. The other site put forward is certainly curious, and has more of the flavor of a myth and wishful thinking about it. Legend has it that the site of the meeting with the Indians was in what is now Inwood Hill Park in the far northwest corner of Manhattan. Here in the park, on a level with West 218th Street, there is an inscribed lump of rock called the The Native Place of Manhattan: Where Did the Manhattan “Purchase” Take Place? Shorakkopoch or Skorakopock rock.i Local legend says that this is the site of Minuit’s transaction with the Indians, “near a knoll on the Spuyten Duyvil Creek.”ii The rock bears a bronze plaque and an inscription, as follows: SHORAKKOPOCH According to legend, on this site of the principal Manhattan village, Peter Minuit in 1626, purchased Manhattan Island for trinkets and beads then worth about 60 guilders. -
Local Geology of New York City and Its Effect on Seismic Ground Motions
Missouri University of Science and Technology Scholars' Mine International Conference on Case Histories in (2004) - Fifth International Conference on Case Geotechnical Engineering Histories in Geotechnical Engineering 13 Apr 2004 - 17 Apr 2004 Local Geology of New York City and Its Effect on Seismic Ground Motions Sissy Nikolaou Mueser Rutledge Consulting Engineers, New York, New York Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/icchge Part of the Geotechnical Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Nikolaou, Sissy, "Local Geology of New York City and Its Effect on Seismic Ground Motions" (2004). International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering. 2. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/icchge/5icchge/session00g/2 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. This Article - Conference proceedings is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars' Mine. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering by an authorized administrator of Scholars' Mine. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LOCAL GEOLOGY OF NEW YORK CITY AND ITS EFFECT ON SEISMIC GROUND MOTIONS Sissy Nikolaou, PhD Mueser Rutledge Consulting Engineers New York, NY (USA) ABSTRACT A thorough understanding of the local geologic and tectonic environment, the seismological history as well as very detailed site specific geotechnical and geophysical data are essential to the proper prediction of local site effects and seismic design in New York City (NYC). The site response in the NYC metropolitan area is affected by the widely varying geologic conditions encountered in the five boroughs. -
The Configuration of the Rock Floor of Greater New York
Bulletin No. 270 . Series B, Descriptive Geology, 73 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. VVALCOTT, DIHECTOK THE CONFIGURATION OF THE ROCK FLOOR OF GREATER NEW YORK BY WILLIAM HERBERT HOBBS WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT. PRINTING OFFICE 1905 CONTENTS. Page. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL .................................................. 7 PART I. STRUCTURAL STUDIES ............................................. .9 Introduction......................................................... 9 Aids to geological studies on Manhattan Island..................... 9 Engineering enterprises that have pierced the rock floor............ 10 Keview of structural geological studies of the New York City area.... 12 Boroughs of Manhattan and the Bronx ........................ 12 Gale .................................................... 12 Mather.................................................. 12 Cozzens ................................................. 12 Stevens.................................................. 12 Credner................................................. 13 Newberry ............................................... 13 Dana.................................................... 14 Russell.................................................. 14 Kemp ................................................... 14 Merrill .................................................. 15 Eckel ................................................... 16 Gratacap ................................................ '16 Julien ..................... i............................. -
HADLEY HOUSE, 5122 Post Road, the Bronx
Landmarks Preservation Commission June 20, 2000; Designation List 315 LP-2059 HADLEY HOUSE, 5122 Post Road, The Bronx. Built eighteenth century; frame addition second quarter of the nineteenth century; remodeled circa 1915-16; Dwight James Baum, architect. Landmark Site: Borough of Bronx Tax Map Block 5825, Lot 1513, in part, consisting of that portion of said lot bounded by the following area: starting from a point 25 feet south of the northwesterly end of the westerly lot line adjacent to The Post Road and continuing south on said lot line to a point approximately 47 .8 feet from the southwesterly most point on the westerly lot line, easterly at an angle of 90 degrees through the lot to the eastern lot line adjacent to The Old Albany Post Road, northerly along the easterly lot line to a point approximately 25 feet south of the northeasterly most point of the easterly lot line, and westerly at an angle of 90 degrees through the lot to the point of beginning. 1 On February 8, 2000, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Hadley House and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 6). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of Jaw. Three witnesses: the owners of the property and a representative of the Historic Districts Council, spoke in favor of the designation. There were no speakers in opposition. The Commission has received letters of support for this designation from Councilwoman June Eisland, Assemblyman Jeffrey Dinowitz, Bronx Borough President Fernando Ferrer, and the Bronx Landmarks Task Force.