DOCSLIB.ORG

C:\Documents and Settings\Nick\Desktop\2006\COVER06.Wpd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

INTERSTATE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION A TRI-STATE WATER AND AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 2006 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE INTERSTATE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION Formerly the INTERSTATE SANITATION COMMISSION INTERSTATE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION COMMISSIONERS NEW YORK CONNECTICUT Judith L. Baron John Atkin Chairperson Vice Chair Gerard J. Kassar Richard Blumenthal Treasurer J. Robert Galvin, M.D., M.P.H. Donna B. Gerstle Regina McCarthy Denise M. Sheehan Patricia M. P. Sesto Rose Trentman NEW JERSEY Frank A. Pecci Vice Chair Lisa P. Jackson Fred M. Jacobs, M.D., J.D. John M. Scagnelli *** ** * Howard Golub Executive Secretary Boris Rukovets Assistant Secretary Eileen D. Millett Counsel INTERSTATE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION STAFF Howard Golub Executive Director and Chief Engineer Boris Rukovets Assistant Executive Director and Assistant Chief Engineer Eileen D. Millett General Counsel Engineering Laboratory Peter L. Sattler Pradyot Patnaik Nicholas S. Protopsaltis Evelyn R. Powers Brian J. Mitchell Inna Golberg Kristen J. Barshatzky Field Investigation Administrative William M. McCormack Carmen L. Leon Caitlyn P. Nichols Elizabeth M. Morgan Bonnie P. Hickey Fay L. Lau Gillian M. Spencer Kristin L. Titmas STATEMENT OF THE CHAIRPERSON OF THE INTERSTATE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION As I near the end of my second term as Chairperson of the Interstate Environmental Commission, I look back with pride and see the environmental progress we have achieved in virtually all of our programs. Being Chairperson of the sole environmental agency in the Tri-State Area with both regulatory and enforcement powers is both a great honor and a great responsibility. It is incumbent upon us to make clear that it is the IEC’s responsibility to encourage and promote interstate cooperation, and to stay fully informed on all matters and issues concerning the quality of our interstate waters. To that end, I am delighted to report that we continue to enhance our reputation and prestige both within our Metropolitan Area of jurisdiction and among interstate commissions that reach from Canada to the Mississippi. Our open lines of communication with our fellow interstate commissions facilitates our ability to stay current on all matters affecting the quality of our interstate waters and, in turn, to quickly react to potential problems within our Region. While we have been actively seeking grants to supplement our traditional state and federal funding, I am pleased to report that this year we were successful in being awarded a research grant of approximately $200,000. It is only through the perseverance and dedication of the staff that this was possible; they are to be highly commended and, hopefully, this is only the first of many grants that the Commission will receive. I am gratified that the IEC again participated in World Water Monitoring Day which has become an annual event that takes place in October. This was the fourth annual World Water Monitoring Day, an event that IEC has participated in since it was started in 2002 as National Water Monitoring Day. The Commission joined with thousands of people around the world to collect water quality data that all the participants input to an international data bank. This international monitoring partnership of the public; state, interstate and local governments; federal agencies and countries throughout the world is an excellent example of the importance of involvement at all levels to protect the environment. I am proud that we have been a part of this effort since its inception. This Report contains highlights of the Commission’s extensive involvement in water monitoring surveys, including special intensive surveys to support both the Long Island Sound Study and the New York-New Jersey Harbor Estuary Program. It gives me great pleasure to report the completion of our 16th year of monitoring in Long Island Sound to document dissolved oxygen conditions. It is our sixth year of monitoring for pathogens in the New York-New Jersey Harbor Complex, our eleventh year of sampling shellfish CO N T E N T S PAGE I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 WATER POLLUTION 3 AIR POLLUTION 5 II. WATER POLLUTION 6 GENERAL 6 CONNECTICUT WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLANTS 8 NEW JERSEY WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLANTS 14 NEW YORK WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLANTS 23 AMBIENT AND EFFLUENT WATER QUALITY MONITORING 61 SPECIAL INTENSIVE SURVEYS 63 2006 AMBIENT WATER QUALITY MONITORING IN LONG ISLAND SOUND TO DOCUMENT DISSOLVED OXYGEN CONDITIONS 63 AMBIENT WATER QUALITY COOPERATIVE STUDIES 73 2005-2006 MICROBIOLOGICAL SURVEYS IN THE SHELLFISH HARVESTING WATERS OF WESTERN RARITAN BAY 73 2006 AMBIENT WATER QUALITY MONITORING FOR PATHOGENS ACROSS HUDSON RIVER TRANSECTS 76 PATHOGEN TRACK DOWN ON THE BYRAM RIVER 80 WORLD WATER MONITORING DAY 83 HARBOR-WIDE WATER QUALITY MONITORING ACTIVITIES IN THE NEW YORK-NEW JERSEY HARBOR COMPLEX 84 2006 BOAT INSPECTION TRIP 84 REGIONAL BYPASS WORKGROUP 87 CLEAN WATER ACT SECTION 305(b) WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT 89 STORET 90 PROPOSED REVISIONS TO DISSOLVED OXYGEN SURFACE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS FOR MARINE WATERS 92 NATIONAL ESTUARY PROGRAM 92 PAGE COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOWS AND MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEMS 94 PUBLIC EDUCATION AND OUTREACH 96 III. AIR POLLUTION 99 GENERAL 99 AIR POLLUTION COMPLAINTS 99 OZONE HEALTH MESSAGE SYSTEM 101 REGIONAL AIR POLLUTION WARNING SYSTEM 101 IV. LEGAL ACTIVITIES 102 MITIGATING NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF NEW YORK CITY’S OPERATION AT THE FRESH KILLS LANDFILL 102 ADDRESSING NITROGEN IMPACTS AND COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW IMPACTS OF SOME NEW YORK CITY SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS 107 APPENDIX A - WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS DISCHARGING INTO INTERSTATE ENVIRONMENTAL DISTRICT WATERS - 2006 A-1 APPENDIX C - INTERSTATE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION FINANCIAL STATEMENT FY 2006 B-1 APPENDIX D - GLOSSARY C-1 I L L U S T R A T I O N S PAGE MAP Wastewater Treatment Plants in the Interstate Environmental District 7 PHOTO East Avenue Pump Station With Long Island Sound in Background, West Haven Water Pollution Control Plant, New Haven County, Connecticut 12 PHOTO New Final Clarifier and UV Disinfection Facility, Westport Water Pollution Control Facility, Fairfield County, Connecticut 13 PHOTO Bar Screens Being Off-Loaded, Middlesex County Utilities Authority, Middlesex County, New Jersey 17 PHOTO Newly Installed UV Disinfection, Glen Cove Water Pollution Control Facility, Nassau County, New York 30 PHOTO New Support Timbers and Hardware for Outfall Pier, Greater Atlantic Beach Water Reclamation District, Nassau County, New York 31 PHOTO BNR-SBR Construction, Huntington Sewer District, Nassau County, New York 33 PHOTOS Site of New Treatment Facility in Hillburn, New York, Rockland County Sewer District #1, Rockland County, New York 51 PHOTO SBRs Under Construction With Port Jefferson Harbor in Background, Suffolk County Sewer District #1, Suffolk County, New York 52 PHOTO Cold Spring Harbor Light, August 2006 60 PHOTO Water Quality Data Recording, July 2006 61 MAP 2006 Long Island Sound Study, Ambient Water Quality Sampling Stations 64 TABLE 2006 Long Island Sound Study Sampling Stations 65 PHOTO Secchi Disc, August 2006 66 CHARTS Long Island Sound Study — 2006 Dissolved Oxygen Monitoring — Surface and Bottom Waters — Pie Charts 68 CHARTS Long Island Sound Study — 2005-2006 Dissolved Oxygen Monitoring — Surface and Bottom Waters — Pie Charts 69 CHARTS Long Island Sound Study — 2006 Dissolved Oxygen Monitoring — Average and Range of All Bottom and Surface Waters Sampled — Profiles 71 CHARTS Long Island Sound Study — 2006 Monthly Bottom Water Temperature Distribution in Long Island Sound — Profiles 72 PAGE MAP 2005-2006 Sampling Stations for Microbiological Surveys in the Shellfish Harvesting Waters of Western Raritan Bay 74 TABLE 2005-2006 Sampling Station Locations for Microbiological Surveys in the Shellfish Harvesting Waters of Western Raritan Bay 75 MAP 2006 Ambient Water Monitoring for Pathogens Across Hudson River Transects 78 TABLE 2006 Sampling Station Locations for Ambient Water Monitoring for Pathogens Across Hudson River Transects 79 PHOTOS 2006 Sampling Stations for Pathogens Across Hudson River 80 MAP Pathogen Track Down on the Byram River 82 PHOTOS Byram River Pathogen Track Down 83 PHOTO Oyster Dredge in Norwalk Harbor, August 2006 85 MAP 2006 Boat Inspection Trip 86 CHART 2006 Bypass Events - Common Causes 88 CHART 2006 Bypass Events Per Waterway 89 TABLE 2005 Individual Use Support in the Interstate Environmental District 91 TABLE 2006 MS4 Dry Weather Inspections, Nassau and Richmond Counties, NY 97 PHOTO Water Quality Monitoring on Newark Bay with Bayonne, NJ, High School Marine Science Students 98 CHART Air Pollution Complaints, 1982-2006 100 CHART Communities Impacted by Odors, 1982-2006 100 PHOTO Skimmer Boat at Fresh Kills Landfill 105 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY When the Commission was created in 1936, the tri-state waters were in terrible condition. World renown shellfish beds were condemned; shorelines were littered with debris, and rotting carcases of farm animals and fish greeted newcomers to the great Melting Pot. Minimal industrial regulation caused local rivers and streams to be unusable; even transportation was hindered by floating debris from collapsing piers and derelict vessels. These activities put ever-increasing demands and stresses on the coastal systems. This was a time when interstate conflicts arose regarding the sanitary conditions of the waters surrounding and shared by the States of New York, New Jersey and Connecticut. Because the vitality of the Tri-State Metropolitan Area is an integral part of the economy
Recommended publications
  • Strategic Policy Statement 2014 Melinda Katz

    Strategic Policy Statement 2014 Melinda Katz

    THE OFFICE OF THE QUEENS BOROUGH PRESIDENT Strategic Policy Statement 2014 Melinda Katz Queens Borough President The Borough of Queens is home to more than 2.3 million residents, representing more than 120 countries and speaking more than 135 languages1. The seamless knit that ties these distinct cultures and transforms them into shared communities is what defines the character of Queens. The Borough’s diverse population continues to steadily grow. Foreign-born residents now represent 48% of the Borough’s population2. Traditional immigrant gateways like Sunnyside, Woodside, Jackson Heights, Elmhurst, Corona, and Flushing are now communities with the highest foreign-born population in the entire city3. Immigrant and Intercultural Services The immigrant population remains largely underserved. This is primarily due to linguistic and cultural barriers. Residents with limited English proficiency now represent 28% of the Borough4, indicating a need for a wide range of social service support and language access to City services. All services should be available in multiple languages, and outreach should be improved so that culturally sensitive programming can be made available. The Borough President is actively working with the Queens General Assembly, a working group organized by the Office of the Queens Borough President, to address many of these issues. Cultural Queens is amidst a cultural transformation. The Borough is home to some of the most iconic buildings and structures in the world, including the globally recognized Unisphere and New York State Pavilion. Areas like Astoria and Long Island City are establishing themselves as major cultural hubs. In early 2014, the New York City Council designated the area surrounding Kaufman Astoria Studios as the city’s first arts district through a City Council Proclamation The areas unique mix of adaptively reused residential, commercial, and manufacturing buildings serve as a catalyst for growth in culture and the arts.
  • 1928-02-00 Index

    1928-02-00 Index

    THE CITY RECORD. INDEX FOR FEBRUARY, 1928. t r ACCOUNTS, COMMISSIONER OF— ALDERMEN, BOARD OF— ALDERMEN, BOARD OF— Changes in the department, etc., 995, 1018, 1040, 1424. Finance, Committee on, report of the— Public Letting, Committee on, report of the— In favor of adopting resolution amending a resolution In favor of adopting resolution authorizing the Presi- ALDERMEN, BOARD OF— for special revenue bonds, $25,000, for making re- American Legion, T. J. Oakley Rhinelander 2d, Post dent of the Borough of Manhattan to contract for pairs to and waterproofing the Soldiers and Sailors No. 6, request for amendment to chapter 1, of article the making safe of roadways, sidewalks and sewers Monument in Riverside drive by extending the time 2, section 8, of the Code of Ordinances, relating to during the year 1928 when emergency arises, with- for use thereof to December 31, 1928, 984, 1217. out public letting; amount, $10,000, 1215, 1406, office hours, 1556. In favor of adopting a resolution amending resolution In favor of adopting resolution authorizing County An ordinance to amend section 2 of article 1 of chapter granting permission to the Church of Mount Carmel, Clerk, Bronx County, to purchase photostat equip- 11 of the Code of Ordinances, relating to the dis- Borough of Manhattan, to construct and maintain a ment, without public letting; amount, $5,470.50, 1215, charge of small-arms, 1574. vault without payment of the usual fee, 984, 1220. 1406. Assessors, Board of, summary of report for 1927 sub- In favor of adopting resolution amending a resolution In favor of adopting resolution authorizing Commis- mitted to his Honor the Mayor, 1215.
  • New York City Comprehensive Waterfront Plan

    New York City Comprehensive Waterfront Plan

    NEW YORK CITY CoMPREHENSWE WATERFRONT PLAN Reclaiming the City's Edge For Public Discussion Summer 1992 DAVID N. DINKINS, Mayor City of New lVrk RICHARD L. SCHAFFER, Director Department of City Planning NYC DCP 92-27 NEW YORK CITY COMPREHENSIVE WATERFRONT PLAN CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMA RY 1 INTRODUCTION: SETTING THE COURSE 1 2 PLANNING FRA MEWORK 5 HISTORICAL CONTEXT 5 LEGAL CONTEXT 7 REGULATORY CONTEXT 10 3 THE NATURAL WATERFRONT 17 WATERFRONT RESOURCES AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE 17 Wetlands 18 Significant Coastal Habitats 21 Beaches and Coastal Erosion Areas 22 Water Quality 26 THE PLAN FOR THE NATURAL WATERFRONT 33 Citywide Strategy 33 Special Natural Waterfront Areas 35 4 THE PUBLIC WATERFRONT 51 THE EXISTING PUBLIC WATERFRONT 52 THE ACCESSIBLE WATERFRONT: ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES 63 THE PLAN FOR THE PUBLIC WATERFRONT 70 Regulatory Strategy 70 Public Access Opportunities 71 5 THE WORKING WATERFRONT 83 HISTORY 83 THE WORKING WATERFRONT TODAY 85 WORKING WATERFRONT ISSUES 101 THE PLAN FOR THE WORKING WATERFRONT 106 Designation Significant Maritime and Industrial Areas 107 JFK and LaGuardia Airport Areas 114 Citywide Strategy fo r the Wo rking Waterfront 115 6 THE REDEVELOPING WATER FRONT 119 THE REDEVELOPING WATERFRONT TODAY 119 THE IMPORTANCE OF REDEVELOPMENT 122 WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT ISSUES 125 REDEVELOPMENT CRITERIA 127 THE PLAN FOR THE REDEVELOPING WATERFRONT 128 7 WATER FRONT ZONING PROPOSAL 145 WATERFRONT AREA 146 ZONING LOTS 147 CALCULATING FLOOR AREA ON WATERFRONTAGE loTS 148 DEFINITION OF WATER DEPENDENT & WATERFRONT ENHANCING USES
  • Board of Commissioners of the NYC Dept of Public Parks

    Board of Commissioners of the NYC Dept of Public Parks

    • DO()UMENT No. 23. BOARD OF THE DEP ARTlIENT OF PUBLIC PARKS. MAY 2, 1871. The President presented a .certined .copy of an act entitled "An act relative to the improvement of certain portions of the counties of vVestchester and New York, including provisions for .communication between said counties, and for improving the navigation of Harlem river and Spuyten Duyvil creek." Ordered, That said act be laid on the table and printed in document form. GEO. M. V AN NORT, Olerk. • Chap. 534. AN ACT relative to the impt'ovement of certain portions of the counties of Westchester and New York, including provisions for communication between said counties, and for improving the navigation of Harlem river and Spny~en Dnyvil creek. Passed April 15, 1871; three fifths being present. The People of the State of New Ym'/c, represented in Senate and A8sembly, do enact as follow8 : SECTION 1. It shall be the duty of the board of commissioners of the department of public parks of the city of New York, to cause a proper survey to be made of all that part of the county of "Vestchester lying south of the southerly line' of the village of Y OIIkers, and a line in continuation thereof eastwardly to Hutchinson river or creek, and including that part of said county lying south of said line and west of said river or creek, or the westerly boundary line of the town of Pelham to Long Island sound, and to devise and prepare maps, plans and pro­ files embracing and showing such changes in the location, 'width, courses, windings, and grades of the streets, avenues, and
  • LISS 3.3.Qxd

    LISS 3.3.Qxd

    RestoringRestoring LongLong CONNECTICUT Connecticut Quinnipiac River River IslandIsland Thames Sound’s River Sound’s Housatonic River Stonington HabitatsHabitats Old Saybrook COMPLETED RESTORATION SITES IN PROGRESS RESTORATION SITES POTENTIAL RESTORATION SITES PROJECT BOUNDARY RIVER LONG ISLAND SOUND Greenwich 2002 RESTORATION SITES Southold BLUE INDICATES COMPLETED SITE – CONSTRUCTION ON THE PROJECT IS FINISHED, BUT MONITORING MAY BE ON-GOING GREEN INDICATES IN PROGRESS SITE– SOME PHASE OF THE PROJECT IS UNDERWAY, E.G. APPLYING FOR FUNDING, DESIGN, OR CONSTRUCTION BLACK INDICATES POTENTIAL SITE – A RESTORATION PROJECT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED, NO ACTION TAKEN YET MOUNT VERNON RYE BOLDFACE IN ALL COLORS INDICATES HIGH-RANKED SITES Rye Glover Field (FW) Beaver Swamp Brook (FW) Beaver Swamp Brook/Cowperwood site (FW) Brookhaven NEW ROCHELLE Blind Brook (FW) Echo Bay (TW/SR/IF/RI) Edith G. Read Wildlife Sanctuary (TW/F/EE/FW) CONNECTICUT Former Dickerman’s Pond (FW) Marshlands Conservancy (TW/F/IF) Farm River (TW) EW ORK Nature Study Woods (F/FW) Farm River tributary/Edgemere Rd. (TW) N Y Pryer Manor Marsh (TW) SMITHTOWN BRANFORD Morris Creek/Sibley Lane (TW) Callahan’s Beach (CB) Branford River STP (TW) New Haven Airport (TW) Bronx BRONX NORTH HEMPSTEAD Fresh Pond (FW/F/BD) Branford R./Christopher Rd. (TW) Nissequogue Bronx Oyster Reefs (SR) Baxter Estates Pond (FW) Harrison Pond Town Park (FW/RMC/TW/F) Branford R./St. Agnes Cemetery (TW) EAST LYME NEW YORK Bronx River mouth (TW/F/RMC) Hempstead Harbor (EE/IF/TW) Landing Avenue Town Park (TW) Branford R./Hickory Rd. (TW) Brides Brook Culvert (RMC/TW) River Bronx River Trailway (TW/FW/F/RMC) Lake Success (FW) Long Beach (BD) Branford R.
  • Yonkers' History

    Yonkers' History

    YONKERS’ HISTORY Village History & Economy Was Built Upon the River: The Hudson River and its rich water resources play prominently in the settlement history, social development, economic health and stability of the City of Yonkers. SETTLEMENT Early Role of the Native Americans - The Algonquin Native Americans were some of the earliest settlers of Yonkers. Clustered in a village at the intersection (confluence) of two waterways called the Muhheakantuck (or Shatemuc) and the Neperah. They called their village ‘Nappeckamack’ which meant either ‘trap fishing place’ or ‘rapid water settlement’. Both translations focus on the importance of the water, and its food supply, to the tribe. Today these same two waterways continue to flow in the area, but we know them now as the Hudson and the Saw Mill Rivers. This location met many of the settlement needs of the Native Americans, including: • Protection from attack – shelter – good visibility • Rich food sources from fish, nuts, small animals • Fresh water and • Ready transit opportunities either on foot or by canoe Henry Hudson: The Native people’s settlement needs were the same as those the Europeans looked for in selecting their settlement locations. In the fall of 1609 Henry Hudson sailed the “Half Moon” up the river that would later bear his name, in search of the Northwest Passage. He stopped at Yonkers to trade with the Native people. He noted the Native American settlement, its excellent location and resources. Records show he obtained oysters from the local tribe. Hudson claimed the Hudson River for the Dutch. The Dutch & De Jonkeer - Adriaen van der Donck was a young lawyer working for the Dutch West India Company.
  • What Is the Natural Areas Initiative?

    What Is the Natural Areas Initiative?

    NaturalNatural AAreasreas InitiativeInitiative What are Natural Areas? With over 8 million people and 1.8 million cars in monarch butterflies. They reside in New York City’s residence, New York City is the ultimate urban environ- 12,000 acres of natural areas that include estuaries, ment. But the city is alive with life of all kinds, including forests, ponds, and other habitats. hundreds of species of flora and fauna, and not just in Despite human-made alterations, natural areas are spaces window boxes and pet stores. The city’s five boroughs pro- that retain some degree of wild nature, native ecosystems vide habitat to over 350 species of birds and 170 species and ecosystem processes.1 While providing habitat for native of fish, not to mention countless other plants and animals, plants and animals, natural areas afford a glimpse into the including seabeach amaranth, persimmons, horseshoe city’s past, some providing us with a window to what the crabs, red-tailed hawks, painted turtles, and land looked like before the built environment existed. What is the Natural Areas Initiative? The Natural Areas Initiative (NAI) works towards the (NY4P), the NAI promotes cooperation among non- protection and effective management of New York City’s profit groups, communities, and government agencies natural areas. A joint program of New York City to protect natural areas and raise public awareness about Audubon (NYC Audubon) and New Yorkers for Parks the values of these open spaces. Why are Natural Areas important? In the five boroughs, natural areas serve as important Additionally, according to the City Department of ecosystems, supporting a rich variety of plants and Health, NYC children are almost three times as likely to wildlife.
  • Description of the New York City District

    Description of the New York City District

    DESCRIPTION OF THE NEW YORK CITY DISTRICT. -By F. J. H. Merrill, N. H. Dartoii, Arthur Hollick, B. D. Salisbury, li. E. Dodge, Bailey Willis, and H. A. Pressey. GENERAL GEOGRAPHY OF THE DISTRICT. By Richard E. Dodge and Bailey Willis. Position. The district described in tins folio is Gedney, and Main channels. Ambrose and Swash Harlem River and Spuyten Duyvil Creek the Coastal Plain in general are low peninsulas sepa­ bounded by the meridians of 78° 45' and 74° 15' channels have a least depth of 3-J- fathoms, while water is but 2 to 3^ fathoms deep. rated by estuaries, in which the tide ebbs and west longitude from Greenwich and the parallels Gedney and Main channels are nowhere less than Newark Bay is an extensive water body, but it flows. These peninsulas are composed of beds of of 40° 30' and 41° north latitude. It covers one- 5 fathoms deep. Within the bar the Lower Bay i is not available for sea-going commerce, as the clay, sand, and gravel, or mixtures of these mate­ quarter of a square degree, equivalent, in this is from 4 to 12 fathoms deep well out from shore, depth is but 2 fathoms or less, except in a little rials constituting loam, and are extensively devel­ latitude, to 905.27 square miles. The map is but toward the New Jersey and Staten Island j channel near the outlet connecting with the Kill oped in Maryland, Delaware, and New Jersey. divided into four atlas sheets, called the Paterson, shores the water shoals to 3 fathoms or less over \ van Kull.
  • Health Department to Conduct Mosquito Adulticiding in Parts of the Bronx and Queens to Reduce Risk of West Nile Virus

    Health Department to Conduct Mosquito Adulticiding in Parts of the Bronx and Queens to Reduce Risk of West Nile Virus

    NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE Dave A. Chokshi, MD MSc Commissioner FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Thursday, August 12, 2021 HEALTH DEPARTMENT TO CONDUCT MOSQUITO ADULTICIDING IN PARTS OF THE BRONX AND QUEENS TO REDUCE RISK OF WEST NILE VIRUS Trucks will spray pesticide in parts of Queens and the Bronx in the evening of Tuesday, August 17 August 12, 2021 – To reduce mosquito activity and the risk of West Nile virus, the Health Department will conduct an adulticide treatment in Queens and the Bronx. Trucks will spray pesticides in sections of Queens and the Bronx on Tuesday, August 17 between the hours of 8:30 p.m. and 6 a.m. the following morning, weather permitting. In case of bad weather or equipment malfunctions, application will be delayed until Wednesday, August 18. The Health Department will use very low concentrations of Anvil®, Duet®, or DeltaGard®. The risks of pesticides applied by the Health Department for mosquito control are low to people and pets. Some people who are sensitive to spray ingredients may experience short-term eye or throat irritation, or a rash. People with respiratory conditions may also be affected. To stay safe during spraying: • Stay indoors, whenever possible. • Air conditioners can remain on. While unnecessary, you may wish to close air conditioner vents, or choose the recirculate function. After spraying: • Wash skin and clothing exposed to pesticides with soap and water. • Always wash fruits and vegetables with water. The most effective way to control mosquitoes is to eliminate any standing water. New Yorkers are also encouraged to mosquito-proof their homes and take precautions when spending time outdoors.
  • March 18, 2019 Agenda

    March 18, 2019 Agenda

    Design Commission Meeting Agenda Monday, March 18, 2019 The Committee Meeting is scheduled to begin at 9:50 a.m. Public Meeting 11:40 a.m. Consent Items 26933: Installation of rooftop mechanical equipment, Queens District 7 Garage, 120-15 31st Avenue, Flushing, Queens. (Preliminary and Final) (CC 19, CB 7) DDC/DSNY 26960: Construction of a parking lot adjacent to Building 280, Flushing Avenue, North Oxford Street, Ordinance Avenue, and Fifth Street, Brooklyn Navy Yard Industrial Park, Brooklyn. (Preliminary and Final) (CC 33, CB 2) BNYDC 26961: Reconstruction of a parking lot adjacent to Building 5, Market Street, Eighth Avenue, Paulding Street, and Sixth Street, Brooklyn Navy Yard Industrial Park, Brooklyn. (Preliminary and Final) (CC 33, CB 2) BNYDC 26962: Installation of a prototypical newsstand, 1396 Second Avenue, northeast corner of Second Avenue and East 72nd Street, Manhattan. (Preliminary and Final) (CC 5, CB 8) DCA/DOT 26963: Installation of a prototypical newsstand, 3100 47th Avenue, southeast corner of 47th Avenue and 31st Street, Long Island City, Queens. (Preliminary and Final) (CC 26, CB 2) DCA/DOT 26964: Installation of a prototypical newsstand, 660 Columbus Avenue, northwest corner of Columbus Avenue and West 92nd Street, Manhattan. (Preliminary and Final) (CC 6, CB 7) DCA/DOT 26965: Installation of the Rebecca Salome Foster Memorial by Karl Bitter, 60 Centre Street, Manhattan. (Preliminary) (CC 1, CB 1) DCAS 26966: Installation of Urban Poet by Alexandre Arrechea, Atlantic Avenue median between Conduit Boulevard and Fountain Avenue, Brooklyn. (Conceptual) (CC 37, CB 5) DCLA%/DDC/DOT 26967: Installation of un(Common) Threads by Borinquen Gallo, 40th Police Precinct, East 149th Street and St.
  • New York City's Wastewater Treatment System

    New York City's Wastewater Treatment System

    New York City’s Wastewater Treatment System Cleaning the Water We Use • Protecting the Environment We Live In New York City Department of Environmental Protection Michael R. Bloomberg, Mayor Emily Lloyd, Commissioner List of Acronyms NYCDEP . New York City Department of Environmental Protection NYSDEC . New York State Department of Environmental Conservation NYCDOS . New York City Department of Sanitation USEPA . United States Environmental Protection Agency NYPA . New York Power Authority NYCSWCD . New York City Soil and Water Conservation District ALS . American Littoral Society WPCP . Water Pollution Control Plant NYOFCo . New York Organic Fertilizer Company IPP . Industrial Pretreatment Program PERC . Perchloroethylene CSO . Combined Sewer Overflow EBPP . Enhanced Beach Protection Program MGD . Million Gallons per Day CWA . Clean Water Act PCB . Polychlorinated Biphenols PAHs . Poly-Aromatic Hydrocarbons BOD . Biochemical Oxygen Demand TSS . Total Suspended Solids DO . Dissolved Oxygen BNR . Biological Nutrient Removal New York City’s Wastewater Treatment System 1 Table of Contents How Water Gets to Us¬ . 4 History of New York City Water . 4 Wastewater Treatment – Past and Present . 5-6 Nitrogen Control Applied Research Program . 6 Wastewater Treatment Process . 7-9 Preliminary Treatment Primary Treatment Secondary Treatment Disinfection Sludge Treatment Thickening Digestion Sludge Dewatering Beneficial Use of Biosolids . 9 How Biosolids Are Used . 10-11 Land Application Composting Alkaline Treatment Heat Drying How New York City Protects Its Water Environment . 11 Testing New York City Waterways Environmental Concerns . 11 Toxic Substances Pollution Control Programs . 12-16 Industrial Pretreatment Program (IPP) Persistent Pollutant Track-down Program Perchloroethylene Program (PERC) Corrosion Control Program 2 New York City’s Wastewater Treatment System Pollution Control Programs Continued .
  • C:\Documents and Settings\Nick.IECDOM\Desktop\Annual Report 2001\1H Pages1-7.Wpd

    C:\Documents and Settings\Nick.IECDOM\Desktop\Annual Report 2001\1H Pages1-7.Wpd

    II. WATER POLLUTION GENERAL During 2001, in the Interstate Environmental District, approximately $8.408 billion was allocated for 277 water pollution control projects which were either completed, in progress, or planned for the future. These monies were allocated in the following manner: over $125.1 million for 55 completed projects, more than $5.3628 billion for 134 projects in progress, and more than $2.92 billion for 88 future projects. These expenditures are being used for engineering studies, pilot projects and experiments; CSO abatement projects; land-based alternatives for sewage sludge disposal; construction of new facilities; and upgrading and/or expanding existing facilities in order to provide adequately treated wastewater for discharge into District waterways. These figures do not include the monies spent by and committed to pollution control by industries. The Commission has long advocated adequate infrastructure as a necessity for maintaining and improving receiving water quality, as well as for minimizing use impairments. These tremendous expenditures on the infrastructure have resulted in significant water quality improvements throughout the District these past years; however, much remains to be done. With secondary treatment virtually in place since 1994 throughout the Interstate Environmental District, control of the region’s combined sewer overflows is necessary in order to achieve further significant water quality improvements. Communities throughout the District have ongoing CSO control programs and projects that range from sewer separation to swirl concentrators to booming and skimming to in-line and off-line storage. The National Estuary Programs in the District have identified major problems affecting water quality which are exacerbated by anthropogenic impacts, namely, nutrient enrichment, sediment contamination, pathogens, habitat loss and floatables.