DOCSLIB.ORG

Neoteleostei Stenopterygii Bristle Mouth Cyclothone Sp. Viperfish

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Neoteleostei Stenopterygii Bristle Mouth Cyclothone Sp. Viperfish 27.4.2012 „modern fishes“ - enhanced Neoteleostei cods tetraodonts • More then 15.000 species • Incredible diversity • Not established systematics Deep sea fishes perches Stenopterygii Bristle mouth Cyclothone sp. • Stomiiformes, Ateleopodiformes • Long independent evolution • Tropical – temperate deep sea fishes • Photophores, large mouth, (adipose fin) • Black (silvery) Viperfish Chauliodus sp. Dragonfish Idiacanthus sp. 1 27.4.2012 Scopelomorpha Daggertooth Anotopterus pharao • Aulopiformes, Myctophiformes, Lamprioformes, Polymixiiformes • Similar to salmoniform fishes • Adipose fin • 14 families 600 species • Deep sea Lancetfish Alepisaurus sp. Lanternfish Myctophum sp. Percopsiformes Sandroller Percopsis sp. • 3 familes 9 species • small fish 5 –20 cm • freshwater habitats in North America 2 27.4.2012 Ophidiiformes Pearlfish Carapus sp. • 3 families, 200 species • Seawater, freshwater and brakishwater, Deep‐ sea • Also in caves (blin d) • Eel‐like fishes Cod fish-Gadus morhua Gadiformes Ordo: Gadiformes • 4 families, 500 species Family: Gadidae • Bottom‐oriented fish • Mainly marine, deep sea, continental shelf, fhfreshwaters Burbot-Lota lota Ordo:Gadiformes Merlucius merlucius Family:Gadidae 3 27.4.2012 Batrachoidiformes Lophiiformes • tma • zima Ceratias holboelli • ohromný prostor Ordo: Lophiiphormes Family: Ceratiidae ilici um males Mugiliformes Atheriniformes 4 27.4.2012 Beloniformes Belone belone ordo Beloniformes Cyprinodontiformes Poecilia sp. Poecilidae Cyprinidontiformes Stephanoberyciloformes Beryciloformes 5 27.4.2012 Zeiformes Synbranchyformes Gasterosteiformes Gasterosteus aculeatus Ordo: Gasterosteiformes-volnoostní Family: Gasteristeidae-koljuškovití Hypocampus sp. Scorpaeniformes Ordo:Gasterosteiformes Family:Syngnathidae 6 27.4.2012 Scorpion fish-Scorpaena scrofa Bullhead Cottus gobio Ordo:Scorpaeniformes Family:Scorpaenidae Ordo:Scorpaeniformes Family:Cottidae Perciforms (Perciformes) Perciformes • double dorsal fin • front of dorsal fin rays with spines • ktenoid scales gas bladder is connected with the esophagus • largest order of vertebrates (6900 species) • quarters of global fish catches number of families: for example Mackerels, pearches, cichlids European perch Perca fluviatilis Tuna Tuna sp. Ordo:Perciformes Ordo:Perciformes-ostnoploutví Family: Percidae Family:Scombridae-Makrelovití 7 27.4.2012 Macrel Scomber scombrus Lates niloticus – Nile perch in Lake Victoria Ordo:Perciformes Family:Scombridae Sea bass (Dicen trarc hus lblabrax ) Sea bream (Sparus aurata ) ‐ Aquaculture • Freshwater, brakish Cichlidae ‐ Nile tilapis water (Oreochromis nilotiscus) important apecies in aquaculture • America, Africa, Asia Pterophyllum altum • Interupt lateral line • One dorsal fin • Moth breedrs, • Cichlidae Symbiotic relation with anemone - Cichlids lives Amphiprion ocellaris , Pomacentridae Gobids Gobiidae Pleuronectiformes • fresh and salt water tropics and subtropics • ventral fins are sucking discs • Climbers (Periophthalmus spp.) • without water lasts several days • Eyes on the surface ‐ see the land • mangroves 8 27.4.2012 Flat fishes Pleuronectiformes • adult‐slim body without bilateral symmetry • from eggs to larva symmetrical • body gradually begins to move one eye to another, • the body flattens video Tetraodontiformes Takifugu vermicularis Ordo: Tetraodontiformes - čtverzubci Family: Tetraodontidae - čtverzubcovití 9.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Phylogeny Classification Additional Readings Clupeomorpha and Ostariophysi
    Teleostei - AccessScience from McGraw-Hill Education http://www.accessscience.com/content/teleostei/680400 (http://www.accessscience.com/) Article by: Boschung, Herbert Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama. Gardiner, Brian Linnean Society of London, Burlington House, Piccadilly, London, United Kingdom. Publication year: 2014 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1036/1097-8542.680400 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1036/1097-8542.680400) Content Morphology Euteleostei Bibliography Phylogeny Classification Additional Readings Clupeomorpha and Ostariophysi The most recent group of actinopterygians (rayfin fishes), first appearing in the Upper Triassic (Fig. 1). About 26,840 species are contained within the Teleostei, accounting for more than half of all living vertebrates and over 96% of all living fishes. Teleosts comprise 517 families, of which 69 are extinct, leaving 448 extant families; of these, about 43% have no fossil record. See also: Actinopterygii (/content/actinopterygii/009100); Osteichthyes (/content/osteichthyes/478500) Fig. 1 Cladogram showing the relationships of the extant teleosts with the other extant actinopterygians. (J. S. Nelson, Fishes of the World, 4th ed., Wiley, New York, 2006) 1 of 9 10/7/2015 1:07 PM Teleostei - AccessScience from McGraw-Hill Education http://www.accessscience.com/content/teleostei/680400 Morphology Much of the evidence for teleost monophyly (evolving from a common ancestral form) and relationships comes from the caudal skeleton and concomitant acquisition of a homocercal tail (upper and lower lobes of the caudal fin are symmetrical). This type of tail primitively results from an ontogenetic fusion of centra (bodies of vertebrae) and the possession of paired bracing bones located bilaterally along the dorsal region of the caudal skeleton, derived ontogenetically from the neural arches (uroneurals) of the ural (tail) centra.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Exon Probe Sets and Bioinformatics Pipelines for All Levels of Fish Phylogenomics
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.18.949735; this version posted February 19, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Exon probe sets and bioinformatics pipelines for all levels of fish phylogenomics 2 3 Lily C. Hughes1,2,3,*, Guillermo Ortí1,3, Hadeel Saad1, Chenhong Li4, William T. White5, Carole 4 C. Baldwin3, Keith A. Crandall1,2, Dahiana Arcila3,6,7, and Ricardo Betancur-R.7 5 6 1 Department of Biological Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. 7 2 Computational Biology Institute, Milken Institute of Public Health, George Washington 8 University, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. 9 3 Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian 10 Institution, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. 11 4 College of Fisheries and Life Sciences, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China 12 5 CSIRO Australian National Fish Collection, National Research Collections of Australia, 13 Hobart, TAS, Australia 14 6 Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History, Norman, O.K., U.S.A. 15 7 Department of Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, O.K., U.S.A. 16 17 *Corresponding author: Lily C. Hughes, [email protected]. 18 Current address: Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, 19 Chicago, IL. 20 21 Keywords: Actinopterygii, Protein coding, Systematics, Phylogenetics, Evolution, Target 22 capture 23 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.18.949735; this version posted February 19, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of the G Protein-Coupled Receptor Family
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Characterization of the G protein‑coupled receptor family SREB across fsh evolution Timothy S. Breton1*, William G. B. Sampson1, Benjamin Cliford2, Anyssa M. Phaneuf1, Ilze Smidt3, Tamera True1, Andrew R. Wilcox1, Taylor Lipscomb4,5, Casey Murray4 & Matthew A. DiMaggio4 The SREB (Super‑conserved Receptors Expressed in Brain) family of G protein‑coupled receptors is highly conserved across vertebrates and consists of three members: SREB1 (orphan receptor GPR27), SREB2 (GPR85), and SREB3 (GPR173). Ligands for these receptors are largely unknown or only recently identifed, and functions for all three are still beginning to be understood, including roles in glucose homeostasis, neurogenesis, and hypothalamic control of reproduction. In addition to the brain, all three are expressed in gonads, but relatively few studies have focused on this, especially in non‑mammalian models or in an integrated approach across the entire receptor family. The purpose of this study was to more fully characterize sreb genes in fsh, using comparative genomics and gonadal expression analyses in fve diverse ray‑fnned (Actinopterygii) species across evolution. Several unique characteristics were identifed in fsh, including: (1) a novel, fourth euteleost‑specifc gene (sreb3b or gpr173b) that likely emerged from a copy of sreb3 in a separate event after the teleost whole genome duplication, (2) sreb3a gene loss in Order Cyprinodontiformes, and (3) expression diferences between a gar species and teleosts. Overall, gonadal patterns suggested an important role for all sreb genes in teleost testicular development, while gar were characterized by greater ovarian expression that may refect similar roles to mammals. The novel sreb3b gene was also characterized by several unique features, including divergent but highly conserved amino acid positions, and elevated brain expression in pufer (Dichotomyctere nigroviridis) that more closely matched sreb2, not sreb3a.
    [Show full text]
  • Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies
    Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies International Journal of Oceanography and Hydrobiology Volume 49, No. 1, March 2020 ISSN 1730-413X pages (34-48) eISSN 1897-3191 Dominant species drive seasonal dynamics of the sh community in the Min estuary, China by Abstract Fishery resources are currently facing multiple stresses Jun Li, Bin Kang* such as over shing, pollution and climate change. Looking into processes and mechanisms of the dynamic sh community through detailed quantitative analyses contributes to e ective conservation and management of shery resources. The Min estuary plays an important role in maintaining sheries in southeastern coastal China, therefore the sh community in the brackish area was investigated and analyzed in this study. A total of 127 DOI: 10.1515/ohs-2020-0004 species belonging to 91 genera, 49 families and 14 orders Category: Original research paper were sampled in 2015. Eight indices re ecting four aspects of sh communities were determined, i.e. species richness, Received: May 5, 2019 species evenness, heterogeneity and taxonomy. Di erences Accepted: August 21, 2019 between the indices were nonsigni cant, suggesting that the use of a single diversity descriptor could not provide a full explanation. Nine dominant species in the Min estuary showed seasonal turnover by rational use of resources and Jimei University, 185 Yinjiang Rd., co-occurring species showed correspondingly adequate 361021 Xiamen, China habitat preferences and feeding habits to avoid competition. The species Harpadon nehereus occurred as the dominant species in three seasons except spring. High values of niche overlap among common or rare species and lower values of niche overlap among all dominant species e ectively brought the diversity of the sh community into a state of equilibrium.
    [Show full text]
  • Lab 9 - an Introduction to Marine Fishes
    Name ___________________________________ Lab 9 - An introduction to marine fishes NOTE: these taxonomic groups have many more species than those shown today; each specimen is but a representative of its particular family or order. PLEASE HANDLE SPECIMENS CAREFULLY!!!! Superclass Agnatha (jawless fishes; ~80 spp.) Class Myxini Order Myxiniformes Family Myxinidae; Hagfish (Myxine glutinosa) Class Cephalaspidomorphi Order Petromyzontiformes Family Petromyzontidae; Sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) 1) What are some key differences between Myxinids and Petromyzontids? Superclass Gnathostomata (jawed fishes) Class Chondrichthyes (cartilaginous fishes) Subclass Elasmobranchii (shark-like fishes; 800 spp) Order Squatiniformes; Angel shark (Squatina dumerili) Order Squaliformes; Spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias) Order Rajiformes; Clearnose skate (Raja eglanteria), Guitarfish (Rhinobatos sp.) Subclass Holocephali (chimaeras; 30 spp) Order Chimaeriformes; Spotted chimaera (Hydrolagus colliei) 2) What are two features that clearly distinguish the order Rajiformes (skates) from sharks? 3) Where in the water column would you expect to find a chimaera? Why? Class Teleostomi (bony fishes) Superorder Clupeomorpha Order Clupeiformes Family Clupeidae; Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus), Menhaden (Brevoortia tyrannus) Family Engraulidae; Anchovy (Anchoa nasuta) 4) What characteristics most clearly separate these two families? 5) These fishes tend to travel in schools. What purpose might the silvery stripe down their sides serve? (Hint: think about this from
    [Show full text]
  • Percomorph Phylogeny: a Survey of Acanthomorphs and a New Proposal
    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 52(1): 554-626, 1993 PERCOMORPH PHYLOGENY: A SURVEY OF ACANTHOMORPHS AND A NEW PROPOSAL G. David Johnson and Colin Patterson ABSTRACT The interrelationships of acanthomorph fishes are reviewed. We recognize seven mono- phyletic terminal taxa among acanthomorphs: Lampridiformes, Polymixiiformes, Paracan- thopterygii, Stephanoberyciformes, Beryciformes, Zeiformes, and a new taxon named Smeg- mamorpha. The Percomorpha, as currently constituted, are polyphyletic, and the Perciformes are probably paraphyletic. The smegmamorphs comprise five subgroups: Synbranchiformes (Synbranchoidei and Mastacembeloidei), Mugilomorpha (Mugiloidei), Elassomatidae (Elas- soma), Gasterosteiformes, and Atherinomorpha. Monophyly of Lampridiformes is justified elsewhere; we have found no new characters to substantiate the monophyly of Polymixi- iformes (which is not in doubt) or Paracanthopterygii. Stephanoberyciformes uniquely share a modification of the extrascapular, and Beryciformes a modification of the anterior part of the supraorbital and infraorbital sensory canals, here named Jakubowski's organ. Our Zei- formes excludes the Caproidae, and characters are proposed to justify the monophyly of the group in that restricted sense. The Smegmamorpha are thought to be monophyletic principally because of the configuration of the first vertebra and its intermuscular bone. Within the Smegmamorpha, the Atherinomorpha and Mugilomorpha are shown to be monophyletic elsewhere. Our Gasterosteiformes includes the syngnathoids and the Pegasiformes
    [Show full text]
  • History of Fishes - Structural Patterns and Trends in Diversification
    History of fishes - Structural Patterns and Trends in Diversification AGNATHANS = Jawless • Class – Pteraspidomorphi • Class – Myxini?? (living) • Class – Cephalaspidomorphi – Osteostraci – Anaspidiformes – Petromyzontiformes (living) Major Groups of Agnathans • 1. Osteostracida 2. Anaspida 3. Pteraspidomorphida • Hagfish and Lamprey = traditionally together in cyclostomata Jaws = GNATHOSTOMES • Gnathostomes: the jawed fishes -good evidence for gnathostome monophyly. • 4 major groups of jawed vertebrates: Extinct Acanthodii and Placodermi (know) Living Chondrichthyes and Osteichthyes • Living Chondrichthyans - usually divided into Selachii or Elasmobranchi (sharks and rays) and Holocephali (chimeroids). • • Living Osteichthyans commonly regarded as forming two major groups ‑ – Actinopterygii – Ray finned fish – Sarcopterygii (coelacanths, lungfish, Tetrapods). • SARCOPTERYGII = Coelacanths + (Dipnoi = Lung-fish) + Rhipidistian (Osteolepimorphi) = Tetrapod Ancestors (Eusthenopteron) Close to tetrapods Lungfish - Dipnoi • Three genera, Africa+Australian+South American ACTINOPTERYGII Bichirs – Cladistia = POLYPTERIFORMES Notable exception = Cladistia – Polypterus (bichirs) - Represented by 10 FW species - tropical Africa and one species - Erpetoichthys calabaricus – reedfish. Highly aberrant Cladistia - numerous uniquely derived features – long, independent evolution: – Strange dorsal finlets, Series spiracular ossicles, Peculiar urohyal bone and parasphenoid • But retain # primitive Actinopterygian features = heavy ganoid scales (external
    [Show full text]
  • 18 Special Habitats and Special Adaptations 395
    THE DIVERSITY OF FISHES Dedications: To our parents, for their encouragement of our nascent interest in things biological; To our wives – Judy, Sara, Janice, and RuthEllen – for their patience and understanding during the production of this volume; And to students and lovers of fishes for their efforts toward preserving biodiversity for future generations. Front cover photo: A Leafy Sea Dragon, Phycodurus eques, South Australia. Well camouflaged in their natural, heavily vegetated habitat, Leafy Sea Dragons are closely related to seahorses (Gasterosteiformes: Syngnathidae). “Leafies” are protected by Australian and international law because of their limited distribution, rarity, and popularity in the aquarium trade. Legal collection is highly regulated, limited to one “pregnant” male per year. See Chapters 15, 21, and 26. Photo by D. Hall, www.seaphotos.com. Back cover photos (from top to bottom): A school of Blackfin Barracuda, Sphyraena qenie (Perciformes, Sphyraenidae). Most of the 21 species of barracuda occur in schools, highlighting the observation that predatory as well as prey fishes form aggregations (Chapters 19, 20, 22). Blackfins grow to about 1 m length, display the silvery coloration typical of water column dwellers, and are frequently encountered by divers around Indo-Pacific reefs. Barracudas are fast-start predators (Chapter 8), and the pan-tropical Great Barracuda, Sphyraena barracuda, frequently causes ciguatera fish poisoning among humans (Chapter 25). Longhorn Cowfish, Lactoria cornuta (Tetraodontiformes: Ostraciidae), Papua New Guinea. Slow moving and seemingly awkwardly shaped, the pattern of flattened, curved, and angular trunk areas made possible by the rigid dermal covering provides remarkable lift and stability (Chapter 8). A Silvertip Shark, Carcharhinus albimarginatus (Carcharhiniformes: Carcharhinidae), with a Sharksucker (Echeneis naucrates, Perciformes: Echeneidae) attached.
    [Show full text]
  • Euteleostei: Aulopiformes) and the Timing of Deep-Sea Adaptations ⇑ Matthew P
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 57 (2010) 1194–1208 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Estimating divergence times of lizardfishes and their allies (Euteleostei: Aulopiformes) and the timing of deep-sea adaptations ⇑ Matthew P. Davis a, , Christopher Fielitz b a Museum of Natural Science, Louisiana State University, 119 Foster Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA b Department of Biology, Emory & Henry College, Emory, VA 24327, USA article info abstract Article history: The divergence times of lizardfishes (Euteleostei: Aulopiformes) are estimated utilizing a Bayesian Received 18 May 2010 approach in combination with knowledge of the fossil record of teleosts and a taxonomic review of fossil Revised 1 September 2010 aulopiform taxa. These results are integrated with a study of character evolution regarding deep-sea evo- Accepted 7 September 2010 lutionary adaptations in the clade, including simultaneous hermaphroditism and tubular eyes. Diver- Available online 18 September 2010 gence time estimations recover that the stem species of the lizardfishes arose during the Early Cretaceous/Late Jurassic in a marine environment with separate sexes, and laterally directed, round eyes. Keywords: Tubular eyes have arisen independently at different times in three deep-sea pelagic predatory aulopiform Phylogenetics lineages. Simultaneous hermaphroditism evolved a single time in the stem species of the suborder Character evolution Deep-sea Alepisauroidei, the clade of deep-sea aulopiforms during the Early Cretaceous. This result indicates the Euteleostei oldest known evolutionary event of simultaneous hermaphroditism in vertebrates, with the Alepisauroidei Hermaphroditism being the largest vertebrate clade with this reproductive strategy. Divergence times Ó 2010 Elsevier Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Co-Occurrence of Tetrodotoxin and Saxitoxins and Their Intra-Body Distribution in the Pufferfish Canthigaster Valentini
    toxins Article Co-Occurrence of Tetrodotoxin and Saxitoxins and Their Intra-Body Distribution in the Pufferfish Canthigaster valentini Hongchen Zhu 1, Takayuki Sonoyama 2, Misako Yamada 1, Wei Gao 1, Ryohei Tatsuno 3, Tomohiro Takatani 1 and Osamu Arakawa 1,* 1 Graduate School of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Nagasaki University. 1-14, Bunkyo-machi, Nagasaki, Nagasaki 852-8521, Japan; [email protected] (H.Z.); [email protected] (M.Y.); [email protected] (W.G.); [email protected] (T.T.) 2 Shimonoseki Marine Science Museum. 6-1, Arcaport, Shimonoseki, Yamaguchi 750-0036, Japan; [email protected] 3 Department of Food Science and Technology, National Fisheries University, Japan Fisheries Research and Education Agency. 2-7-1, Nagatahonmachi, Shimonoseki, Yamaguchi 759-6595, Japan; tatsuno@fish-u.ac.jp * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +81-95-819-2844 Received: 9 June 2020; Accepted: 2 July 2020; Published: 3 July 2020 Abstract: Pufferfish of the family Tetraodontidae possess tetrodotoxin (TTX) and/or saxitoxins (STXs), but the toxin ratio differs, depending on the genus or species. In the present study, to clarify the distribution profile of TTX and STXs in Tetraodontidae, we investigated the composition and intra-body distribution of the toxins in Canthigaster valentini. C. valentini specimens (four male and six female) were collected from Amami-Oshima Island, Kagoshima Prefecture, Japan, and the toxins were extracted from the muscle, liver, intestine, gallbladder, gonads, and skin. Analysis of the extracts for TTX by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry and of STXs by high-performance liquid chromatography with post-column fluorescence derivatization revealed TTX, as well as a large amount of STXs, with neoSTX as the main component and dicarbamoylSTX and STX itself as minor components, in the skin and ovary.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Lampridiform Fishes
    W&M ScholarWorks VIMS Articles Virginia Institute of Marine Science 1993 Phylogeny Of Lampridiform Fishes JE Olney Virginia Institute of Marine Science GD Johnson Virginia Institute of Marine Science CC Baldwin Virginia Institute of Marine Science Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/vimsarticles Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Olney, JE; Johnson, GD; and Baldwin, CC, Phylogeny Of Lampridiform Fishes (1993). Bulletin of Marine Science, 52(1), 137-169. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/vimsarticles/1533 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Virginia Institute of Marine Science at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in VIMS Articles by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 52(1): 137-169, 1993 PHYLOGENY OF LAMPRIDIFORM FISHES John E. Olney, G. David Johnson and Carole C. Baldwin ABSTRACT A survey of characters defining the Neoteleostei, Eurypterygii, Ctenosquamata, Acantho- morpha, Paracanthopterygii and Acanthopterygii convincingly places the Lampridiformes within the acanthomorph clade. Lampridiforms are primitive with respect to the Percomorpha but their precise placement among basal acanthomorphs remains unclear. In the absence of a specific sister-group hypothesis, Polymixia. percopsiform and beryciform taxa were used as outgroups in a cladistic analysis of the order. Monophyly of Lampridiformes is supported by four apomorphies; three are correlated modifications related to the evolution ofa unique feeding mechanism in which the maxilla slides forward with the premaxilla during jaw protrusion. The Veliferidae are the sister group of all other lampridiforms.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating Multi-Origin Expression Data Improves The
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by KU ScholarWorks Integrating multi-origin expression data improves the resolution of deep SUBJECT AREAS: PHYLOGENY phylogeny of ray-finned fish PHYLOGENETICS BIOINFORMATICS (Actinopterygii) ZOOLOGY Ming Zou1,2, Baocheng Guo3,4, Wenjing Tao1,2, Gloria Arratia5 & Shunping He1 Received 1 10 May 2012 The key Laboratory of Aquatic Biodiversity and Conservation of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430072, PR China, 2Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, PR Accepted China, 3Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland, 4The Swiss 20 August 2012 Institute of Bioinformatics, Quartier Sorge-Batiment Genopode, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland, 5Biodiversity Research Institute, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, U.S.A. Published 18 September 2012 The actinopterygians comprise nearly one-half of all extant vertebrate species and are very important for human well-being. However, the phylogenetic relationships among certain groups within the actinopterygians are still uncertain, and debates about these relationships have continued for a long time. Correspondence and Along with the progress achieved in sequencing technologies, phylogenetic analyses based on multi-gene requests for materials sequences, termed phylogenomic approaches, are becoming increasingly common and often result in should be addressed to well-resolved and highly supported phylogenetic hypotheses. Based on the transcriptome sequences S.H. ([email protected]) generated in this study and the extensive expression data currently available from public databases, we obtained alignments of 274 orthologue groups for 26 scientifically and commercially important actinopterygians, representing 17 out of 44 orders within the class Actinopterygii.
    [Show full text]