DOCSLIB.ORG

Percomorph Phylogeny: a Survey of Acanthomorphs and a New Proposal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Percomorph Phylogeny: a Survey of Acanthomorphs and a New Proposal BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 52(1): 554-626, 1993 PERCOMORPH PHYLOGENY: A SURVEY OF ACANTHOMORPHS AND A NEW PROPOSAL G. David Johnson and Colin Patterson ABSTRACT The interrelationships of acanthomorph fishes are reviewed. We recognize seven mono- phyletic terminal taxa among acanthomorphs: Lampridiformes, Polymixiiformes, Paracan- thopterygii, Stephanoberyciformes, Beryciformes, Zeiformes, and a new taxon named Smeg- mamorpha. The Percomorpha, as currently constituted, are polyphyletic, and the Perciformes are probably paraphyletic. The smegmamorphs comprise five subgroups: Synbranchiformes (Synbranchoidei and Mastacembeloidei), Mugilomorpha (Mugiloidei), Elassomatidae (Elas- soma), Gasterosteiformes, and Atherinomorpha. Monophyly of Lampridiformes is justified elsewhere; we have found no new characters to substantiate the monophyly of Polymixi- iformes (which is not in doubt) or Paracanthopterygii. Stephanoberyciformes uniquely share a modification of the extrascapular, and Beryciformes a modification of the anterior part of the supraorbital and infraorbital sensory canals, here named Jakubowski's organ. Our Zei- formes excludes the Caproidae, and characters are proposed to justify the monophyly of the group in that restricted sense. The Smegmamorpha are thought to be monophyletic principally because of the configuration of the first vertebra and its intermuscular bone. Within the Smegmamorpha, the Atherinomorpha and Mugilomorpha are shown to be monophyletic elsewhere. Our Gasterosteiformes includes the syngnathoids and the Pegasiformes (Pegasus) and Indostomiformes (lndostomus), two groups which are shown to be immediately related to syngnathoids by modifications of the gill filaments and their skeletal supports. Monophyly of the Gasterosteiformes in this sense is justified by several characters. We are unable to resolve the interrelationships among the five subgroups of Smegmamorpha. The remaining percomorphs are the Perciformes (including Caproidae), Scorpaeniformes, Dactylopteri- formes, Pleuronectiformes and Tetraodontiformes; we have found nothing to indicate that Percomorphain that sense are monophyletic, although our survey does not cover Tetraodonti- formes. We believe that Scorpaeniformes and Pleuronectiformes are nested within Perci- formes, but again have found nothing to indicate that Perciformes in this expanded sense are monophyletic. We recommend extending the Percomorpha to include the Atherinomorpha (and other smegmamorphs), and argue that this larger group is monophyletic. A scheme of relationships of the seven groups Lampridiformes, Polymixiiformes, Paracanthopterygii, Stephanoberyciformes, Zeiformes, Beryciformes and the expanded Percomorpha is presented and supported by apomorphies. New names for higher acanthomorph taxa are proposed as follows: Euacanthomorpha (Acanthomorpha minus Lampridiformes), Holacanthopterygii (Eucanthomorpha minus Polymixiiformes), and Euacanthopterygii (Acanthopterygii minus Stephanoberyciformes). Monophyly of Beryciformes s.1. (including stephanoberyciforms) is rejected because Beryciformes s.s. share several apomorphies with the expanded Percomor- pha, all of which are absent in Stephanoberyciformes. The Zeiformes are the most problematic of the acanthomorph groups; with the characters that we have been able to assess, the zeiforms are placed most parsimoniously as the sister-group of Euacanthopterygii (i.e., between stepha- noberyciforms and beryciforms on the cladogram), but we do not propose a name for the taxon so formed. There is a disturbing incidence of homoplasy in the characters that we have investigated in acanthomorphs. Fishes, considered collectively ... offer to the philosopher an endless source of meditation and surprise. J.-A. Brillat-Savarin, "The Philosopher in the Kitchen," 1825. Thus, recent work has resolved the bush at the bottom, but the bush at the top persists. G. Nelson (1989: 328). 554 JOHNSON AND PATTERSON: PERCOMORPH PHYLOGENY 555 Our original intention, in getting together to produce a concluding paper for this symposium volume on percomorph phylogeny, was to summarize and draw together the contents of the volume. We have, in fact, produced something more pretentious or utopian. The organizer of a symposium on percomorph phylogeny might hope that the result would be a new and well-supported scheme of rela- tionships for the group, or at least for its major clades. That is not what this volume contains; the majority of the included papers deal with phylogenetic relationships within perciform clades. We do not comment on those, not because we disregard them but because they concern disparate twigs of the tree, and so make no connected story. Here we are more concerned with the main branches of the tree, percomorphs and their relatives. We decided, perhaps unwisely, to grasp the nettle, to plunge into the glycerin, and to propose a scheme of relation- ships for those groups. That was, in part, an aim of the symposium, because in the concluding general discussion the participants collaborated, with more or less enthusiasm, in drawing up such a scheme. Our own concluding cladogram agrees with that post-symposium version in having eight nodes or non-terminal com- ponents, but all eight of those components are different in the two, and only six out of a dozen terminals are identical (they are polymixiids, lampridiforms, par- acanthopterygians, gasterosteiforms, mugiloids, and atherinomorphs). There are several billion other possibilities, and in presenting ours we recognize one other point that came up in the post-symposium discussion, that any tree can be justified by special pleading, by insisting that certain characters are uniquely derived but others are more labile or plastic. Our adventure with the glycerin convinced us of one thing-very few of the characters found among percomorphs and their relatives are uniquely derived, and progress will not be made without some special pleading. Reviewing and comparing all of the contributors' manuscripts for this volume has been a stimulus to the development of our own ideas, however misguided they may be. Inevitably, those ideas contradict some of the contributors, most of whom have not had the opportunity to respond. We apologize to them here, and acknowledge the unfair advantage that we enjoyed. THE PERCOMORPH PROBLEM When Rosen (1973) named Percomorpha, it included beryciforms, perciforms, and the groups placed between and beyond those in Greenwood et al.'s (1966) classification, such as zeiforms, lampridiforms, gasterosteiforms, scorpaeniforms, pleuronectiforms and tetraodontiforms; in others words, Percomorpha = Acan- thopterygii minus Atherinomorpha. Rosen gave no characters for his Percomor- pha, and to our knowledge, no one has subsequently found any that characterize all the included taxa (e.g., Lauder and Liem, 1983). Possible counter examples to that statement may be found in Stiassny (1990), who cited medial suturing or apposition of the pelvic bones and ventral displacement of the anteromedial process of the pelvic bone, and Roberts (1993), who cites transforming ctenoid scales. But Stiassny's percomorph characters are denied by Stiassny's (1990, 1993) own argument that mugiloids, which have the characters, are related to atheri- nomorphs, and Roberts's character, strictly applied (as he employs it in this volume), necessitates exclusion from the percomorphs of percoid taxa such as Priacanthidae, Epigonidae, Bramidae, Ostracoberyx and Howella. Our current understanding of the Percomorpha as circumscribed by Rosen is that they are polyphyletic, and are therefore an unreal and uncharacterizable group. We believe that the situation can be rectified only by modifying the content ofPercomorpha, 556 BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, VOL. 52, NO. I, 1993 excluding some of Rosen's percomorphs and including some of his non-perco- morphs. Our reasons for these changes include proposals and opinions concerning (I) the lampridiforms, (2) the paracanthopterygians, (3) the beryciforms, (4) the atherinomorphs, (5) the perciforms, and (6) the zeiforms. In the following sections we summarize information on those six groups, discussing characters (given bold numbers) of which some are described in detail only in the succeeding character list. Nevertheless, there is unavoidable repetition between the accounts of indi- vidual groups and the concluding description of characters. Our conclusions on those six groups lead us to propose names for several new higher taxa within acanthomorphs, a procedure that may seem premature. But our goal is to focus in on the Percomorpha, to characterize the group and to specify what it does and does not contain; we give new names for acanthomorph taxa that we believe to be either more or less inclusive than Percomorpha to achieve that goal and to place Percomorpha in the hierarchy. Rosen (1964: 220) wrote "In any study that involves taxonomic rearrangements, inevitably there arises the question of what to call various groups during the presentation of new evidence, especially when new group names are proposed and groups of long standing are dismembered and the components are redistrib- uted." We faced the same problem here. In the following we use the name "lam- pridiforms" in the sense of Olney et al. (1993; i.e., excluding ateleopodids); "par- acanthopterygians" and "atherinomorphs" are used in the conventional sense (as circumscribed, for example, respectively by Patterson and Rosen, 1989, and Pa- renti, 1993); "perciforms" means Perciformes in the conventional sense (Nelson, 1984),
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Zoology Marine Ornamental Fish Biodiversity of West Bengal ABSTRACT
    Research Paper Volume : 4 | Issue : 8 | Aug 2015 • ISSN No 2277 - 8179 Zoology Marine Ornamental Fish Biodiversity of KEYWORDS : Marine fish, ornamental, West Bengal diversity, West Bengal. Principal Scientist and Scientist-in-Charge, ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Dr. B. K. Mahapatra Salt Lake City, Kolkata-700091, India Director and Vice-Chancellor, ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Versova, Dr. W. S. Lakra Mumbai- 400 061, India ABSTRACT The State of West Bengal, India endowed with 158 km coast line for marine water resources with inshore, up-shore areas and continental shelf of Bay of Bengal form an important fishery resource and also possesses a rich wealth of indigenous marine ornamental fishes.The present study recorded a total of 113 marine ornamental fish species, belonging to 75 genera under 45 families and 10 orders.Order Perciformes is represented by a maximum of 26 families having 79 species under 49 genera followed by Tetraodontiformes (5 family; 9 genus and 10 species), Scorpaeniformes (2 family; 3 genus and 6 species), Anguilliformes (2 family; 3 genus and 4 species), Syngnathiformes (2 family; 3 genus and 3 species), Pleuronectiformes (2 family; 2 genus and 4 species), Siluriformes (2 family; 2 genus and 3 species), Beloniformes (2 family; 2 genus and 2 species), Lophiformes (1 family; 1 genus and 1 species), Beryciformes(1 family; 1 genus and 1 species). Introduction Table 1: List of Marine ornamental fishes of West Bengal Ornamental fishery, which started centuries back as a hobby, ORDER 1: PERCIFORMES has now started taking the shape of a multi-billion dollar in- dustry.
    [Show full text]
  • Order BERYCIFORMES ANOPLOGASTRIDAE Fangtooths (Ogrefish) by J.A
    click for previous page 1178 Bony Fishes Order BERYCIFORMES ANOPLOGASTRIDAE Fangtooths (ogrefish) by J.A. Moore, Florida Atlantic University, USA iagnostic characters: Small (to about 160 mm standard length) beryciform fishes.Body short, deep, and Dcompressed, tapering to narrow peduncle. Head large (1/3 standard length). Eye smaller than snout length in adults, but larger than snout length in juveniles. Mouth very large and oblique, jaws extend be- hind eye in adults; 1 supramaxilla. Bands of villiform teeth in juveniles are replaced with large fangs on dentary and premaxilla in adults; vomer and palatines toothless. Deep sensory canals separated by ser- rated ridges; very large parietal and preopercular spines in juveniles of one species, all disappearing with age. Gill rakers as clusters of teeth on gill arch in adults (lath-like in juveniles). No true fin spines; single, long-based dorsal fin with 16 to 20 rays; anal fin very short-based with 7 to 9 soft rays; caudal fin emarginate; pectoral fins with 13 to 16 soft rays; pelvic fins with 7 soft rays. Scales small, non-overlapping, spinose, goblet-shaped in adults; lateral line an open groove partially bridged by scales; no enlarged ventral keel scutes. Colour: entirely dark brown or black in adults. Habitat, biology, and fisheries: Meso- to bathypelagic, at depths of 75 to 5 000 m. Carnivores, with juveniles feeding on mainly crustaceans and adults mainly on fishes. May sometimes swim in small groups. Uncommon deep-sea fishes of no commercial importance. Remarks: The family was revised recently by Kotlyar (1986) and contains 1 genus with 2 species throughout the tropical and temperate latitudes.
    [Show full text]
  • §4-71-6.5 LIST of CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November
    §4-71-6.5 LIST OF CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November 28, 2006 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INVERTEBRATES PHYLUM Annelida CLASS Oligochaeta ORDER Plesiopora FAMILY Tubificidae Tubifex (all species in genus) worm, tubifex PHYLUM Arthropoda CLASS Crustacea ORDER Anostraca FAMILY Artemiidae Artemia (all species in genus) shrimp, brine ORDER Cladocera FAMILY Daphnidae Daphnia (all species in genus) flea, water ORDER Decapoda FAMILY Atelecyclidae Erimacrus isenbeckii crab, horsehair FAMILY Cancridae Cancer antennarius crab, California rock Cancer anthonyi crab, yellowstone Cancer borealis crab, Jonah Cancer magister crab, dungeness Cancer productus crab, rock (red) FAMILY Geryonidae Geryon affinis crab, golden FAMILY Lithodidae Paralithodes camtschatica crab, Alaskan king FAMILY Majidae Chionocetes bairdi crab, snow Chionocetes opilio crab, snow 1 CONDITIONAL ANIMAL LIST §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Chionocetes tanneri crab, snow FAMILY Nephropidae Homarus (all species in genus) lobster, true FAMILY Palaemonidae Macrobrachium lar shrimp, freshwater Macrobrachium rosenbergi prawn, giant long-legged FAMILY Palinuridae Jasus (all species in genus) crayfish, saltwater; lobster Panulirus argus lobster, Atlantic spiny Panulirus longipes femoristriga crayfish, saltwater Panulirus pencillatus lobster, spiny FAMILY Portunidae Callinectes sapidus crab, blue Scylla serrata crab, Samoan; serrate, swimming FAMILY Raninidae Ranina ranina crab, spanner; red frog, Hawaiian CLASS Insecta ORDER Coleoptera FAMILY Tenebrionidae Tenebrio molitor mealworm,
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny Classification Additional Readings Clupeomorpha and Ostariophysi
    Teleostei - AccessScience from McGraw-Hill Education http://www.accessscience.com/content/teleostei/680400 (http://www.accessscience.com/) Article by: Boschung, Herbert Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama. Gardiner, Brian Linnean Society of London, Burlington House, Piccadilly, London, United Kingdom. Publication year: 2014 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1036/1097-8542.680400 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1036/1097-8542.680400) Content Morphology Euteleostei Bibliography Phylogeny Classification Additional Readings Clupeomorpha and Ostariophysi The most recent group of actinopterygians (rayfin fishes), first appearing in the Upper Triassic (Fig. 1). About 26,840 species are contained within the Teleostei, accounting for more than half of all living vertebrates and over 96% of all living fishes. Teleosts comprise 517 families, of which 69 are extinct, leaving 448 extant families; of these, about 43% have no fossil record. See also: Actinopterygii (/content/actinopterygii/009100); Osteichthyes (/content/osteichthyes/478500) Fig. 1 Cladogram showing the relationships of the extant teleosts with the other extant actinopterygians. (J. S. Nelson, Fishes of the World, 4th ed., Wiley, New York, 2006) 1 of 9 10/7/2015 1:07 PM Teleostei - AccessScience from McGraw-Hill Education http://www.accessscience.com/content/teleostei/680400 Morphology Much of the evidence for teleost monophyly (evolving from a common ancestral form) and relationships comes from the caudal skeleton and concomitant acquisition of a homocercal tail (upper and lower lobes of the caudal fin are symmetrical). This type of tail primitively results from an ontogenetic fusion of centra (bodies of vertebrae) and the possession of paired bracing bones located bilaterally along the dorsal region of the caudal skeleton, derived ontogenetically from the neural arches (uroneurals) of the ural (tail) centra.
    [Show full text]
  • New Insights on the Sister Lineage of Percomorph Fishes with an Anchored Hybrid Enrichment Dataset
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 110 (2017) 27–38 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev New insights on the sister lineage of percomorph fishes with an anchored hybrid enrichment dataset ⇑ Alex Dornburg a, , Jeffrey P. Townsend b,c,d, Willa Brooks a, Elizabeth Spriggs b, Ron I. Eytan e, Jon A. Moore f,g, Peter C. Wainwright h, Alan Lemmon i, Emily Moriarty Lemmon j, Thomas J. Near b,k a North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, Raleigh, NC, USA b Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology and Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA c Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA d Department of Biostatistics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA e Marine Biology Department, Texas A&M University at Galveston, Galveston, TX 77554, USA f Florida Atlantic University, Wilkes Honors College, Jupiter, FL 33458, USA g Florida Atlantic University, Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institution, Fort Pierce, FL 34946, USA h Department of Evolution & Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA i Department of Scientific Computing, Florida State University, 400 Dirac Science Library, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA j Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, 319 Stadium Drive, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA k Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA article info abstract Article history: Percomorph fishes represent over 17,100 species, including several model organisms and species of eco- Received 12 April 2016 nomic importance. Despite continuous advances in the resolution of the percomorph Tree of Life, resolu- Revised 22 February 2017 tion of the sister lineage to Percomorpha remains inconsistent but restricted to a small number of Accepted 25 February 2017 candidate lineages.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Plate Biogeography, with Special Reference to Shorefishes
    Pacific Plate Biogeography, with Special Reference to Shorefishes VICTOR G. SPRINGER m SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY • NUMBER 367 SERIES PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Emphasis upon publication as a means of "diffusing knowledge" was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian. In his formal plan for the Institution, Joseph Henry outlined a program that included the following statement: "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge." This theme of basic research has been adhered to through the years by thousands of titles issued in series publications under the Smithsonian imprint, commencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoo/ogy Smithsonian Studies in Air and Space Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the Institution publishes small papers and full-scale monographs that report the research and collections of its various museums and bureaux or of professional colleagues in the world cf science and scholarship. The publications are distributed by mailing lists to libraries, universities, and similar institutions throughout the world. Papers or monographs submitted for series publication are received by the Smithsonian Institution Press, subject to its own review for format and style, only through departments of the various Smithsonian museums or bureaux, where the manuscripts are given substantive review.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep-Water Sinkholes and Bioherms of South Florida and the Pourtalès Terrace — Habitat and Fauna
    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 77(2): 267–296, 2005 CORAL REEF PAPER DEEP-WATER SINKHOLES AND BIOHERMS OF SOUTH FLORIDA AND THE POURTALÈS TERRACE — HABITAT AND FAUNA John K. Reed, Shirley A. Pomponi, Doug Weaver, Charles K. Paull, and Amy E. Wright ABSTRACT Only a small percentage of deep-water reefs have had their benthic and fish re- sources characterized. This study surveyed eight deep-water, high-relief, hard-bot- tom sites off south Florida using human occupied submersibles to characterize habitat and describe the fish and macrobenthic communities: the Naples deep-water sink- hole on the southwest Florida shelf, Jordan and Marathon deep-water sinkholes on the Pourtalès Terrace, and five high-relief bioherms on the Pourtalès Terrace. These submersible dives were the first to enter and explore any of these features. The up- per sinkhole rims ranged from 175 to 461 m in depth and had a maximum relief of 180 m. The Jordan sinkhole may be one of the deepest and largest sinkholes known. The high-relief bioherms occurred at depths of 198–319 m, with a maximum height of 120 m. A total of 26 and 16 fish taxa were identified from the sinkhole and bio- herm sites, respectively. Species of potentially commercial importance included tilefish, sharks, speckled hind, yellowedge grouper, warsaw grouper, snowy grouper, blackbelly rosefish, red porgy, drum, scorpionfish, amberjack, and phycid hakes. In total, 66 Porifera taxa were identified and four are possible new species. Twenty- one species of Cnidaria included Antipatharia (three spp.), stylasterid hydrocorals (five spp.), octocorals (11 spp.), and one scleractinian.
    [Show full text]
  • Order BERYCIFORMES ANOPLOGASTRIDAE Anoplogaster
    click for previous page 2210 Bony Fishes Order BERYCIFORMES ANOPLOGASTRIDAE Fangtooths by J.R. Paxton iagnostic characters: Small (to 16 cm) Dberyciform fishes, body short, deep, and compressed. Head large, steep; deep mu- cous cavities on top of head separated by serrated crests; very large temporal and pre- opercular spines and smaller orbital (frontal) spine in juveniles of one species, all disap- pearing with age. Eyes smaller than snout length in adults (but larger than snout length in juveniles). Mouth very large, jaws extending far behind eye in adults; one supramaxilla. Teeth as large fangs in pre- maxilla and dentary; vomer and palatine toothless. Gill rakers as gill teeth in adults (elongate, lath-like in juveniles). No fin spines; dorsal fin long based, roughly in middle of body, with 16 to 20 rays; anal fin short-based, far posterior, with 7 to 9 rays; pelvic fin abdominal in juveniles, becoming subthoracic with age, with 7 rays; pectoral fin with 13 to 16 rays. Scales small, non-overlap- ping, spinose, cup-shaped in adults; lateral line an open groove partly covered by scales. No light organs. Total vertebrae 25 to 28. Colour: brown-black in adults. Habitat, biology, and fisheries: Meso- and bathypelagic. Distinctive caulolepis juvenile stage, with greatly enlarged head spines in one species. Feeding mode as carnivores on crustaceans as juveniles and on fishes as adults. Rare deepsea fishes of no commercial importance. Remarks: One genus with 2 species throughout the world ocean in tropical and temperate latitudes. The family was revised by Kotlyar (1986). Similar families occurring in the area Diretmidae: No fangs, jaw teeth small, in bands; anal fin with 18 to 24 rays.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf
    European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences.
    [Show full text]
  • Constraints on the Timescale of Animal Evolutionary History
    Palaeontologia Electronica palaeo-electronica.org Constraints on the timescale of animal evolutionary history Michael J. Benton, Philip C.J. Donoghue, Robert J. Asher, Matt Friedman, Thomas J. Near, and Jakob Vinther ABSTRACT Dating the tree of life is a core endeavor in evolutionary biology. Rates of evolution are fundamental to nearly every evolutionary model and process. Rates need dates. There is much debate on the most appropriate and reasonable ways in which to date the tree of life, and recent work has highlighted some confusions and complexities that can be avoided. Whether phylogenetic trees are dated after they have been estab- lished, or as part of the process of tree finding, practitioners need to know which cali- brations to use. We emphasize the importance of identifying crown (not stem) fossils, levels of confidence in their attribution to the crown, current chronostratigraphic preci- sion, the primacy of the host geological formation and asymmetric confidence intervals. Here we present calibrations for 88 key nodes across the phylogeny of animals, rang- ing from the root of Metazoa to the last common ancestor of Homo sapiens. Close attention to detail is constantly required: for example, the classic bird-mammal date (base of crown Amniota) has often been given as 310-315 Ma; the 2014 international time scale indicates a minimum age of 318 Ma. Michael J. Benton. School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. [email protected] Philip C.J. Donoghue. School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. [email protected] Robert J.
    [Show full text]
  • Order GASTEROSTEIFORMES PEGASIDAE Eurypegasus Draconis
    click for previous page 2262 Bony Fishes Order GASTEROSTEIFORMES PEGASIDAE Seamoths (seadragons) by T.W. Pietsch and W.A. Palsson iagnostic characters: Small fishes (to 18 cm total length); body depressed, completely encased in Dfused dermal plates; tail encircled by 8 to 14 laterally articulating, or fused, bony rings. Nasal bones elongate, fused, forming a rostrum; mouth inferior. Gill opening restricted to a small hole on dorsolat- eral surface behind head. Spinous dorsal fin absent; soft dorsal and anal fins each with 5 rays, placed posteriorly on body. Caudal fin with 8 unbranched rays. Pectoral fins large, wing-like, inserted horizon- tally, composed of 9 to 19 unbranched, soft or spinous-soft rays; pectoral-fin rays interconnected by broad, transparent membranes. Pelvic fins thoracic, tentacle-like,withI spine and 2 or 3 unbranched soft rays. Colour: in life highly variable, apparently capable of rapid colour change to match substrata; head and body light to dark brown, olive-brown, reddish brown, or almost black, with dorsal and lateral surfaces usually darker than ventral surface; dorsal and lateral body surface often with fine, dark brown reticulations or mottled lines, sometimes with irregular white or yellow blotches; tail rings often encircled with dark brown bands; pectoral fins with broad white outer margin and small brown spots forming irregular, longitudinal bands; unpaired fins with small brown spots in irregular rows. dorsal view lateral view Habitat, biology, and fisheries: Benthic, found on sand, gravel, shell-rubble, or muddy bottoms. Collected incidentally by seine, trawl, dredge, or shrimp nets; postlarvae have been taken at surface lights at night.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences
    e-ISSN: 2347-7830 p-ISSN: 2347-7822 Research and Reviews: Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences Range Extension of Endangered Earthworm Eel Pillaia indica Yazdani, 1972 (Synbranchiformes: Chaudhuriidae) from West Bengal, India. Muthukumarasamy Arunachalam1*, Manickam Raja1, Subramaniyam Nandagopal1, Chinnian Vijayakumar2, Punniyam Malaiammal1, and Showket Ahmad Bhat1. 1Sri Paramakalyani Centre for Environmental Sciences, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Alwarkurichi - 627 412, Tamil Nadu, India. 2Department of Zoology, St. Andrew’s College, Gorakhpur -273 001, Uttar Pradesh, India. Short Communication Received: 11/11/2013 Revised: 12/12/2013 ABSTRACT Accepted: 15/12/2013 Pillaia indica Yazdani 1972, was described from Khasi hills of *For Correspondence Meghalaya state, India and the distributional range is restricted to less than 10 km2 and based on that it was concluded that it is a biogeographic Sri Paramakalyani Centre for relict confined to a very small geographic location. However, in a recent Environmental Sciences, survey we collected 10 specimens from Darjeeling district, West Bengal Manonmaniam Sundaranar indicated that this species is widely distributed and the sampling needs University, Alwarkurichi-627 skill as these species dwell inside the exposed roots of riparian canopy 412, Tamil Nadu, India. along the streams. Mobile: +91 94431 84735 Keywords: Pillaia indica, New record, Biogeographic relict, Darjeeling district, West Bengal. INTRODUCTION The South Asian Mastacembeloid fish family Chaudhuridae is popularly called as earthworm eels and this family includes six genera eight species. They are small, living in buried riparian vegetation and in bottom substrate or with substrate mixed with fine sand and clay. They differ externally from the family Mastacembelidae in having only soft fin instead of spines anteriorly in dorsal and anal fins [3] and the distributional range of this family is from Brahmaputra river basin, India.
    [Show full text]