Resettlement from the Russian North: an Analysis of State-Induced Relocation Policy Arctic Centre Reports 55
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Problems of Urengoy Oil-Gas-Condensate Field at the Late Stage of Exploitation
PROBLEMS OF URENGOY OIL-GAS-CONDENSATE FIELD AT THE LATE STAGE OF EXPLOITATION V.A. Istomin (NOVATEK JSC, Moscow, Russia) G.A.Lanchakov, V.A Stavitskiy, N.A.Tsvetkov (Gazprom dobycha Urengoy LLC, Novy Urengoy, Russia) Urengoy Oil-Gas-Condensate field on the primary proven deposits exceeds 12 tcm of gas. The field is situated in the Western Siberia on the North of the Tyumen region in the areas of unstable permafrost, with the severe climate conditions and with the total absence of infrastructure at the beginning of its development. Basic features of Urengoy field: - multilayer productive horizons (from the bearing Senomanian horizons to Achimov and Jura sediments) - considerable distinctive gas-condensate characteristics of the productive horizons (from practically total condensate lack in Senomanian deposits to 300-400 g/m3 of hydrocarbon condensate in Achimov deposits) - the presence of the considerable ethane content up to 5-7 mol. % in natural gas (that determines the future of gas-chemistry development in the region) - the presence of the formation anomalous pressure factor (FAPF) (so anomalous factor in Achimov stratum is 2 and over, primary formation pressure reaches 70 MPa) in some deposits - the presence of oil rims in some gas-condensate deposits. As a result exploitation objects (5-6 objects) are distinguished with greatly distinctive primary formation pressure and gas-condensate characteristics as well as oil deposits (rims), which development has a considerable peculiarity in comparison with the ordinary oil deposits. Urengoy oil-gas-condensate field is developed since 1978. In the beginning Senomanian gas deposit had been developed, then Valanginian gas-condensate deposits were put into operation, Achimov deposits are being developing now. -
Yamalia English Language Teachers’ Association
Yamalia English Language Teachers’ Association YAMALIA – THE BACK OF BEYOND A Series of English Lessons in Yamalia Studies Edited by Eugene Kolyadin Yelena Gorshkova Oxana Sokolenko Irina Kolyadina Based on teaching materials created by Alevtina Andreyeva (Salemal), Svetlana Bochkaryova (Salekhard), Natalia Bordzilovskaya (Noyabrsk), Natalia Derevyanko (Noyabrsk), Yelena Gorshkova (Gubkinsky), Olga Grinkevich (Muravlenko), Tamara Khokhlova (Noyabrsk), Anzhelika Khokhlyutina (Muravlenko), Irina Kolyadina (Gubkinsky), Yulia Rudakova (Nadym), Irina Rusina (Noyabrsk), Diana Saitova (Nadym), Yulia Sibulatova (Nadym), Natalia Soip (Nadym), Yelena Ten (Nadymsky district), Natalya Togo (Nyda), Olga Yelizarova (Noyabrsk), Alfiya Yusupova (Muravlenko), Irina Zinkovskaya (Nadym) Phonetic and Listening Comprehension tapescripts sounded by Svetlana Filippova, Associate Professor, Nizhny Novgorod Dobrolyubov State Linguistics University Gubkinsky Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug 2015 2 Yamalia English Language Teachers’ Association Yamalia – the Back of Beyond. A Series of English Lessons in Yamalia Studies: Сборник учебно-методических материалов для проведения учебных занятий по регионоведению Ямало-Ненецкого автономного округа на английском языке в 8 – 11 классах средних общеобразовательных организаций / Под ред. Е.А. Колядина, Е.А. Горшковой, И.А. Колядиной, О.Б. Соколенко. – Губкинский, 2015. – 82 c. – На англ. яз. Yamalia – the Back of Beyond 3 FOREWORD1 The booklet you are holding in your hands now is a fruit of collaboration of tens of Yamalia teachers of English from different parts of the okrug. The main goal of the authors’ team was to summarise the best practices developed by the okrug educators as well as their expertise in teaching regional studies and disseminate that all around Yamalia. We think that it is a brilliant idea to arm our teachers with ready-made though flexible to adaptation lessons to teach students to different aspects of life in our lands in English. -
Russia's Policies for Arctic Cities
RUSSIAN ANALYTICAL DIGEST No. 129, 24 June 2013 2 ANALYSIS Russia’s Policies for Arctic Cities By Alexander Pilyasov, Moscow Abstract Although the population of Russia’s Arctic has shrunk notably in the past two decades, the region contin- ues to be highly urbanized. The process of developing sustainable, economically self-sufficient, and socially resilient urban centers requires the implementation of informed and directed policy at the federal and local level. In order to assist in informing better policy, this article establishes several categories of northern urban centers based on their economies, political situation, and social networks. The efficacy of policy is analyzed through two case studies, the cities of Muravlenko and Gubkinsky, which have experienced divergent out- comes despite their proximity and organization. Finally, some general policy recommendations are proposed for the different urban categories, based on their varying needs and characteristics. Introduction (a short statistical review of mum to minimum salaries is often a factor of three. The Russian Arctic cities) most attractive sectors in terms of salary are usually pub- Russian Arctic cities are known for the large size of their lic policy, finance, and mining. In the single-industry populations relative to the Arctic region in general. By cities, differentials between maximum and minimum far, the majority of the biggest Arctic cities are located salaries are usually greater, sometimes by a factor of six, in Russia. Their large size stems from the Soviet era’s but in extreme cases the difference between the best and “triumph of the cities,” and continues to be centered worst paid can be as much as 13 times. -
Russia's Arctic Cities
? chapter one Russia’s Arctic Cities Recent Evolution and Drivers of Change Colin Reisser Siberia and the Far North fi gure heavily in Russia’s social, political, and economic development during the last fi ve centuries. From the beginnings of Russia’s expansion into Siberia in the sixteenth century through the present, the vast expanses of land to the north repre- sented a strategic and economic reserve to rulers and citizens alike. While these reaches of Russia have always loomed large in the na- tional consciousness, their remoteness, harsh climate, and inaccessi- bility posed huge obstacles to eff ectively settling and exploiting them. The advent of new technologies and ideologies brought new waves of settlement and development to the region over time, and cities sprouted in the Russian Arctic on a scale unprecedented for a region of such remote geography and harsh climate. Unlike in the Arctic and sub-Arctic regions of other countries, the Russian Far North is highly urbanized, containing 72 percent of the circumpolar Arctic population (Rasmussen 2011). While the largest cities in the far northern reaches of Alaska, Canada, and Greenland have maximum populations in the range of 10,000, Russia has multi- ple cities with more than 100,000 citizens. Despite the growing public focus on the Arctic, the large urban centers of the Russian Far North have rarely been a topic for discussion or analysis. The urbanization of the Russian Far North spans three distinct “waves” of settlement, from the early imperial exploration, expansion of forced labor under Stalin, and fi nally to the later Soviet development 2 | Colin Reisser of energy and mining outposts. -
A Spatial Study of Geo-Economic Risk Exposure of Russia's Arctic Mono-Towns with Commodity Export-Based Economy
Journal of Geography and Geology; Vol. 6, No. 1; 2014 ISSN 1916-9779 E-ISSN 1916-9787 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education A Spatial Study of Geo-Economic Risk Exposure of Russia’s Arctic Mono-Towns with Commodity Export-Based Economy Anatoly Anokhin1, Sergey Kuznetsov2 & Stanislav Lachininskii1 1 Department of Economic & Social Geography, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia 2 Institute of Regional Economy of RAS, Russian Academy of Science, Saint-Petersburg, Russia Correspondence: Stanislav Lachininskii, Department of Economic & Social Geography, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia. Tel: 7-812-323-4089. E-mail: [email protected] Received: December 30, 2013 Accepted: January 14, 2014 Online Published: January 16, 2014 doi:10.5539/jgg.v6n1p38 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jgg.v6n1p38 Abstract In the context of stagnating global economy mono-towns of Arctic Russia are especially exposed to uncertainty in their socio-economic development. Resource orientation of economy that formed in the 20th century entails considerable geo-economical risk exposure both for the towns and their population as well as for Russia's specific regions. In the 1990–2000s Russia’s Arctic regions were exposed to a systemic crisis which stemmed from production decline, out-migration, capital asset obsolescence, depletion of mineral resources and environmental crisis. This spatial study of geo-economic risk exposure of Russia’s Arctic mono-towns with commodity export-based economy was conducted at four dimensions - global, macro-regional, regional and local. The study of the five types of geo-economic risks was based on the existing approach, economic and socio-demographic risks being the most critical for the towns under consideration. -
Presentation
Environmental aspects of urbanization in the Russian Arctic E.V. Abakumov Saint-Petersburg State University, Department of Applied Ecology, 1 [email protected] Arctic is about 37 % of Russian territory, but the Cryolithozone is about 54-60 % of total state area Population of Russian Arctic Developmental Population, thousands zone people European part –Siberia - Chukotka Murmansk 796 Population of key developmantal zones Arkhangelsk 661 800 Nenets 42 700 Vorkuta 143 600 Yamal 522 500 Taymyr 217 400 thousands 300 Yakutsk 65 (not all republic) 200 Chukotka 52 100 0 Nenets Yamal Total 2498 (involved in to Mumansk Yakutsk economic activity - 1300) Creation of “Development zones” in the Arctic accodring to Federal program “Development of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation and the national security up to 2020” • Development zones: 1 – Kola, 2 –Arkhangelsk, 3 – Nenets, 4 – Vorkuta, 5 Yamal, 6- Taymyr, 7 – North-Yakutks, 8 - Chukotka Population of the Russian Arctic: 2391 min =2,2% of whole population Arctic Population total urban 89,3 % 2500 2000 1500 1000 10,7% other 500 0 total urban other Number of cities with population range number of cities with population 14 14 12 9 10 8 6 4 4 3 4 2 1 2 0 5000 10000 20000 50000 1000000 250000 300000 Key Factors, Limiting the Arctic Zone Development • a) extreme climatic conditions, including low temperatures, strong winds and the presence of ice in the waters of the Arctic seas; • b) the localized nature of industrial and economic development of the areas and low population density; • c) the distance -
EGU2018-11870, 2018 EGU General Assembly 2018 © Author(S) 2018
Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 20, EGU2018-11870, 2018 EGU General Assembly 2018 © Author(s) 2018. CC Attribution 4.0 license. The first estimates of winter urban heat island intensity for medium-sized cities in the Eurasian Arctic Mikhail Varentsov (1,2) and Pavel Konstantinov (1) (1) Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia ([email protected]), (2) A.M. Obukhov Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Moscow, Russia The Urban Heat Island (UHI) effect is well studied for moderate and low latitudes. But the knowledge about the UHIs in the Arctic was extremely poor until the nowadays. It was limited by few studies for Alaskan towns (e.g. Hinkel et al. 2003), while the biggest Arctic cities located in Russian sector of Northern Eurasia were the terra incognita of urban climatology. In this study we present the first estimates of winter-time UHI intensity for the medium-sized cities of Russian Arctic. They are based on the UHIARC (Urban Heat Island Arctic Research Campaign) seasonal-scale experimental meteorological observations in the five cities: Apatity in Kola peninsula, Vorkuta in the north-east of the European Russia and Nadym, Novy Urengoy and Salekhard in the north of Western Siberia. All of them have quite similar population (from 50 to 115 thousands inhabitants) and typical dense building by medium-rise blocks of flats. Observations were made by the automatic weather stations and low-cost temperature loggers. The measurements in Vorkuta, Nadym, Novy Urengoy and Salekhard have shown quite similar values of the UHI intensity and patterns of its temporal variation. The average winter UHI intensity is 1-1.5 K, while extremes up to 6-7 K are observed in frosty anticyclonic weather. -
Additional Information to OAO Gazprom's 2010 Annual Report
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO OAO GAZPROM’S 2010 ANNUAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Members of OAO Gazprom’s Revision Commission .....................................................................................2 Meetings held by OAO Gazprom’s Board of Directors in 2010 ......................................................................3 Ongoing legal proceedings connected with debt enforcement as of December 31, 2010 ..........................11 OAO Gazprom participation in share capital of third companies as of December 31, 2010 .......................13 MEMBERS OF OAO GAZPROM’S REVISION COMMISSION Information about the People Elected as Members of the Revision Commission at the Annual General Shareholders Meeting Dated June 25, 2010. Full name Date of Birth Position as of December 31, 2010 Dmitry Alexandrovich Arkhipov 1975 Deputy Head of the Administration of the Management Committee – Head of OAO Gazprom’s Internal Audit Department, Chairman of the Commission Vadim Kasymovich Bikulov 1957 Head of Directorate of the Internal Audit Department of the Administration of OAO Gazprom’s Management Committee, secretary of the Commission Andrey Nikolaevich Kobzev 1971 Head of the Expert Analysis Department of the Federal Agency for State Property Management Nina Vladislavovna Lobanova 1955 Dmitry Sergeevich Logunov 1979 Deputy Director of the Economics and Analysis Department of the Russian Ministry of Agriculture Yury Stanislavovich Nosov 1963 Deputy Head of the Administration of the Management Committee – Head of OAO Gazprom’s Affairs Management -
An Assessment of the Flux of Radionuclide Contamination Through the Ob and Yenisei Rivers and Estuaries to the Kara Sea
NO9700007 An Assessment of the Flux of Radionuclide Contamination Through the Ob and Yenisei Rivers and Estuaries to the Kara Sea THERESA PALUSZKIEWICZ1, LYLE F. HIBLER1, MARSHALL C. RICHMOND2, DON J. BRADLEY2 ''Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Battelle Marine Sciences Laboratory, 1529 West Sequim Bay Road, Sequim, WA 98382, USA . 2Pacific Northwest Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352, USA. Introduction Extensive radioactive contamination (about 63,000 PBq) has been discharged to the environment of the West Siberian Basin. The former Soviet Union (FSU) nuclear program has been operating for the last 50 years; most of its facilities are located in the West Siberian Basin. These nuclear facilities include three sites for reprocessing spent fuel from the FSU's production reactors: Mayak, Tomsk-7, and Krasnoyarsk-26 (Fig. 1). These are believed to be responsible for the majority of the radioactive contamination that is in the major river systems, the Ob and Yenisei, which feed into the Arctic Ocean through the Kara Sea. Extensive radioactive contamination has been reported in surface water reservoirs, and large amounts of radioactive contamination have been discharged to injection sites that are adjacent to tributaries of the Ob and Yenisei Rivers. A massive release of radionuclide contaminants could result if floods, reservoir failures, or containment failures were to occur (Foley, 1991; Bradley, 1991, 1992a, 1992b; Bradley and Schneider, 1990). The Ob River system consists of the contaminant release sites (FSU nuclear defense sites on land), the terrestrial, ground, and surface waters that link the contaminant release sites to the rivers, the Ob River, its tributaries, the estuary, and the confluence region where the estuaries of the Ob and Yenisei mix and flow into the Kara Sea (Fig. -
Agrochemical and Pollution Status of Urbanized Agricultural Soils in the Central Part of Yamal Region
energies Article Agrochemical and Pollution Status of Urbanized Agricultural Soils in the Central Part of Yamal Region Timur Nizamutdinov 1 , Evgeny Abakumov 1,* , Eugeniya Morgun 2, Rostislav Loktev 2 and Roman Kolesnikov 2 1 Department of Applied Ecology, Faculty of Biology, St. Petersburg State University, 16th Liniya V.O., 29, 199178 St. Petersburg, Russia; [email protected] 2 Arctic Research Center of the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous District, Respublikiv, 20, 629008 Salekhard, Russia; [email protected] (E.M.); [email protected] (R.L.); [email protected] (R.K.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: This research looked at the state of soils faced with urbanization processes in the Arctic region of the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous District (YANAO). Soils recently used in agriculture, which are now included in the infrastructure of the cities of Salekhard, Labytnangi, Kharsaim, and Aksarka in the form of various parks and public gardens were studied. Morphological, physico-chemical, and agrochemical studies of selected soils were conducted. Significant differences in fertility parameters between urbanized abandoned agricultural soils and mature soils of the region were revealed. The quality of soil resources was also evaluated in terms of their ecotoxicology condition, namely, the concentrations of trace metals in soils were determined and their current condition was assessed using calculations of various individual and complex soil quality indices. Keywords: Arctic; soil resources; polar urbanization; permafrost; trace metals; nutrients Citation: Nizamutdinov, T.; Abakumov, E.; Morgun, E.; Loktev, R.; Kolesnikov, R. Agrochemical and Pollution Status of Urbanized 1. Introduction Agricultural Soils in the Central Part Nowadays, the majority of countries of the world are faced with new development of Yamal Region. -
A-Tale-Of-Two-Arctic-Cities -Vorkuta-And-Salekhard.Pdf
● Vorkuta and Salekhard are two Russian cities in the Arctic. Vorkuta, once a Gulag prison camp and booming coal town, suffers from a poor economy and a declining population. Salekhard, on the other hand, is undergoing its own boom through the influx of private investment and continued state support of the natural gas industry and amid rising oil and gas prices since the early 2000s. Through a comparison of the two cities, Suter demonstrates how cities contend with drastic boom-bust cycles, shifting demands for natural resources, political upheaval, and climate change. ● Vorkuta was a once-thriving single industry city built around explosive demand for mineral sources by exploiting prison labor ● What is the relationship between the natural environment, changing demand for natural resources, and the urban landscapes of Vorkuta and Salekhard? How do historical changes play out in a city’s physical landscape? ● What caused Vorkuta’s decline? Will Salekhard one day meet the same fate as Vorkuta? ● How did the same historical events hit the two cities differently? How can you facilitate and encourage urban growth while avoiding the pitfalls that caused Vorkuta’s decline? ● Labytnangi is highly urbanized and infrastructure is adapted to the weather of the region. For example, buildings are connected by above-ground pipelines to isolate heat, preventing infrastructure from thawing the permafrost, which functions like bedrock, below. ● Salekhard, a nearby city, is the capital of the oil and gas rich Yamal-Nents Autonomous Okrug (YNAO). The Russian state-owned natural gas producer Gazprom is highly active in the region. The influx of capital from the oil and natural gas industries have enabled massive transformations in housing, luxury developments, and modern facilities. -
Indigenous Peoples in the Russian Federation
INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION Johannes Rohr Report 18 IWGIA – 2014 INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION Copyright: IWGIA Author: Johannes Rohr Editor: Diana Vinding and Kathrin Wessendorf Proofreading: Elaine Bolton Cover design and layout: Jorge Monrás Cover photo: Sakhalin: Indigenous ceremony opposite to oil facilities. Photographer: Wolfgang Blümel Prepress and print: Electronic copy only Hurridocs Cip data Title: IWGIA Report 18: Indigenous Peoples in the Russian Federation Author: Johannes Rohr Editor: Diana Vinding and Kathrin Wessendorf Number of pages: 69 ISBN: 978-87-92786-49-4 Language: English Index: 1. Indigenous peoples – 2. Human rights Geographical area: Russian Federation Date of publication: 2014 INTERNATIONAL WORK GROUP FOR INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS Classensgade 11 E, DK 2100 - Copenhagen, Denmark Tel: (45) 35 27 05 00 - Fax: (45) 35 27 05 07 E-mail: [email protected] - Web: www.iwgia.org This report has been prepared and published with the financial support of the Foreign Ministry of Denmark through its Neighbourhood programme. CONTENTS Introduction................................................................................................................................................................. 8 1 The indigenous peoples of the north ................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Matters of definition .........................................................................................................................................