DOCSLIB.ORG

Stage 4: Aurora 5 Site - 24 Hour Testing 14

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stage 4: Aurora 5 Site - 24 Hour Testing 14 Stage 4: Aurora 5 Site - 24 Hour Testing 14 14 Stage 5: Recommend a Preferred Solution 15 •Rehabilitate Aurora Well No. 5, Aurora Well No. 6 and Newmarket Well No. 15 •Construct new wells at: • Green Lane • Aurora Well No. 5 19 Stage 6: Confirm Preferred Solution – Green Lane 16 Green Lane Well Construction: • Aquifer Thickness – 31 m • Transmitting Capacity – 104 L/s • Available Drawdown – 33 m • Completion Date – July 27th, 2016 • Diameter – 0.30 m (12”) • Step Test – July 28, 2016 • Depth – 93 m • 72 hour Test - August 2-5, 2016 • Screen Length – 10.7 m Parameter Step-Test 72 Hour Test Pumping Rate 18/36/55 55 (L/s) Drawdown (m) 0.14/0.37/0.77 3.8 Specific Capacity 71 (at 55 L/s) 15 (L/s/m) Water Quality Hardness and iron Hardness and iron Results above ODWQS above ODWQS 19 Stage 6: Confirm Preferred Solution - Green Lane 17 Monitoring Wells 17 Stage 6: Confirm Preferred Solution - Aurora 18 Aurora Well Construction: • Aquifer Thickness – 30 m • Completion Date – September 7th, • Available Drawdown – 45 m 2016 • Diameter – 0.30 m (12”) • Step Test – September 7, 2016 • Depth – 97.5 m • 72 hour Test – Sept 12-15, 2016 • Screen Length – 7.9 m (underway) • Transmitting Capacity – 75 L/s Parameter Step-Test 72 Hour Test Pumping Rate (L/s) 20/40/55 55 Drawdown (m) 0.45/0.95/1.51 TBD Specific Capacity 36 (at 55 L/s) TBD (L/s/m) Water Quality TBD TBD Results 19 Stage 6: Confirm Preferred Solution – Aurora 19 Monitoring Wells 19 LSRCA Regulation Area – Green Lane 20 19 LSRCA Regulation Area – Aurora 5 21 19 Source Water Protection 22 •Class EA Requirements (2014 Amendments): Clean Water Act and Source Protection Plans • Includes additional references to the Clean Water Act and Source Protection Plans • Class EA amendments serve as a reminder to consider source water protection as part of proponent’s decision making process •MOECC Consultation: • To include in Project File: • Section on Source Protection • Summary on preliminary consultation with stakeholders • Preliminary WHPAs consultation with Local Municipalities • Work plan • Letter from Source Protection Authority to support the work plan 19 Source Water Protection 23 •York Region’s Work Plan • To complete prior to the new wells becoming part of YR Water system • Review and Update Groundwater Flow Model • Delineate WHPAs • Vulnerability Scoring • Assessment and Mapping of Aquifer Vulnerability in WHPAs • Assignment and Mapping of Vulnerability Scores • Analysis and Rating of Uncertainty • Threats Assessment and Verification • Mapping and updates to Regional Official Plan • Source Protection Plan update • Public Consultation 23 Wellhead Protection Area (preliminary) – Green Lane 24 24 Wellhead Protection Area (preliminary) – Aurora 5 25 25 Key Dates 26 York Region will conduct Stage 2 Comments received tonight will Archaeological Assessments at be considered together with the the Preferred1 Well Sites to results of Stage 5 to confirm 2 the 3 identify the presence of Preferred Well Site(s). Please provide agency archaeological resources,Notice if any. of Completion: Public Review Period: comments by: November 3, 2016 November 3 to September 30, 2016 December 5, 2016 20 From: Shelly Cuddy [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 12:18 PM To: Cushing, Julia; Melinda Bessey; Charles Burgess Cc: [email protected]; Alexander, Matthew (Guelph); Quackenbush, Patricia Subject: RE: Yonge Street Aquifer: DRAFT Project File for LSRCA Review Hi Julia, Thank you for giving us the opportunity to comment on the Yonge Street Aquifer Well Supply Restoration project. I went through the report in some detail and have reviewed the preferred options. At this time I do not have any concerns regarding the 2 proposed water supply wells. It was noted that the technical report will be provided within the appendix so my review did not include the hydrogeological assessment. However, given the location of the proposed wells and the PTTW will not be increasing I don’t anticipate that the conservation authority will have any concerns. Please note that Melinda is currently out of the office and she has not reviewed the report. Melinda will be able to answer any planning or permitting questions you may have. Thanks Shelly Cuddy, P.Geo. Hydrogeologist Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority 120 Bayview Parkway, Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 3W3 905-895-1281, ext. 313 | 1-800-465-0437 | [email protected] | www.LSRCA.on.ca The information in this message (including attachments) is directed in confidence solely to the person(s) named above and may not be otherwise distributed, copied or disclosed. The message may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act and by the Personal Information Protection Electronic Documents Act. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the message without making a copy. Thank you. From: Cushing, Julia [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: November-16-16 12:28 PM To: Melinda Bessey; Shelly Cuddy; Charles Burgess Cc: [email protected]; Alexander, Matthew (Guelph); Quackenbush, Patricia Subject: RE: Yonge Street Aquifer: DRAFT Project File for LSRCA Review Hi Shelley, Thanks for the call today – here is the link to the document: This file will be available for download until 11/23/2016 File Description Size YORK-5280711-v6-DRAFT Project File_2016_11_02.pdf 144,172KB We look forward to your comments early next week – please let us know if you would like to discuss or if you have any question as you complete your review. Regards, Julia Julia Cushing, MCIP, RPP Senior Environmental Planner D: 905-747-1922 (NEW) C: 416-528-5017 [email protected] AECOM 30 Leek Crescent, 4th Floor Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 4N4 T: 905-882-4401 F: 905-882-4399 (NEW) www.aecom.com This communication is intended for the sole use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or subject to copyright. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately. Any communication received in error should be deleted and all copies destroyed. Please consider the environment before printing this page. From: Cushing, Julia Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2016 4:25 PM To: [email protected]; '[email protected]'; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; Alexander, Matthew (Guelph); Quackenbush, Patricia Subject: Yonge Street Aquifer: DRAFT Project File for LSRCA Review Hello Melinda, Shelly and Charles, Please find, at the link below, the Draft Project File for the Yonge Street Aquifer Well Capacity Restoration Project. Melinda, as you may recall, we met about this Project on September 14, 2016 - this Project is being conducted in accordance with the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Process for a Schedule B Project and the purpose is to restore the full permitted capacity of York Region’s wells within the Yonge Street Aquifer. The Preferred Solution involves rehabilitating four existing wells and constructing two new wells. The Draft Project File documents the studies conducted, the decision making process and consultation undertaken since the commencement of this project. The Draft Project File will be available for downloading until November 9, 2016. File Description Size YORK-5280711-v6-DRAFT Project File_2016_11_02.pdf 144,172KB Please let us know if you have any questions or comments. We ask that you provide us with your comments by November 16, 2016. Regards, Julia Julia Cushing, MCIP, RPP Senior Environmental Planner D: 905-747-1922 (NEW) C: 416-528-5017 [email protected] AECOM 30 Leek Crescent, 4th Floor Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 4N4 T: 905-882-4401 F: 905-882-4399 (NEW) www.aecom.com This communication is intended for the sole use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or subject to copyright. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately. Any communication received in error should be deleted H.8.4 MTCS Consultation Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Ministère du Tourisme, de la Culture et du Sport Sport Culture Programs Unit Unité des programmes culturels Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture 401 Bay Street, Suite 1700 401, rue Bay, bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A 0A7 Toronto ON M7A 0A7 [email protected] [email protected] February 12, 2013 Jessica Marr Archeoworks Inc. 16715-12 Yonge Street, Suite #1029 Newmarket, Ontario L3X 1X4 RE: Entry into the Ontario Public Register of Archaeological Reports: Archaeological Assessment Report Entitled, “Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment (AA): Yonge Street Aquifer Well Capacity Restoration Environmental Assessment Township of East Gwillimbury And Township of Whitchurch Regional Municipality of York Ontario”, Dated January 17, 2013, Received by MTCS Toronto Office on February 4, 2013, MTCS Project Information Form Number P334-240-2012, MTCS File Number 19WT129 Dear Ms. Marr: The above-mentioned report, which has been submitted to this Ministry as a condit ion of licensing in accordance with Part VI of the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c 0.18 has been entered into the Ontario Public Register of Archaeological Reports without technical review.1 Please note that the ministry makes no representation or warranty as to the completeness, accuracy or quality of reports in the register. Should you require further information, please do not hesit ate to send y our inquiry to [email protected]. cc. Matt King, Brutto Consulting Jane Petlyarsky, Town of Richmond Hill 1In no way will the ministry be liable for any harm, damages, costs, expenses, losses, claims or actions that may result: (a) if the Report(s) or its recommendations are discovered to be inaccurate, incomplete, misleading or fraudulent; or (b) from the issuance of this letter.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lecture Draft Notes (356.5Kb)
    Surrender No. 40: draft 15 A Lecture/Performance Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Fine Arts (Special Case) in Theatre University of Regina By Kenneth Clayton Wilson 26 April 2017 © 2017: K.C. Wilson Acknowledgements Many people generously gave me advice and encouragement and assistance during the Muscle and Bone and Surrender No. 40 performances. I want to acknowledge their contributions here. In particular, I am grateful to Dr. Jesse Rae Archibald-Barber; Dr. Mary Blackstone; Professor Kathryn Bracht; Dr. Daniel Coleman; Dr. Edward Doolittle; Professor David Garneau; Norma General; Richard Goetze; Liz Goetze; Professor William Hales; Professor Kelly Handerek; Tom Hill; Dr. Andrew Houston; Dr. Kathleen Irwin; Naomi Johnson; Amos Key, Jr.; Rob Knox; Janice Longboat; Dr. Dawn Martin- Hill; Dr. Sophie McCall; Janis Monture; Professor Wes D. Pearce; Wendy Philpott; Jessica Powless; Dr. Brian Rice; Dr. Kathryn Ricketts; Dr. Dylan Robinson; Wanda Schmöckel; Michael Scholar, Jr.; Noel Starblanket; Ara Steininger; Dr. Michael Trussler; Bonnie Whitlow; Marilyn Wilson; Pamela Wilson McCormick; Maggie Wilson-Wong; Calvin Wong-Birss; and Dr. Tom Woodcock. I couldn’t have completed these performances without their help. Many others also helped out, and I am thankful for their assistance as well. The Department of English and the Lifelong Learning Centre, both at the University of Regina, and Dr. Kathryn Ricketts gave me opportunities to read the text before an audience, for which I am grateful. And, of course, I owe a tremendous debt of gratitude to Dr. Christine Ramsay for her continuing love, support, and encouragement.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Public Consultation Record
    Krosno Creek Flood Reduction Project PROJECT FILE REPORT CITY OF PICKERING ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Appendix A Public Consultation Record TMIG | THE MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP LTD _____________________________________________________________________________ CITY OF PICKERING Krosno Creek Flood Reduction Study COMMUNICATIONS PLAN▪ FEBRUARY 2015 TMIG | The Municipal Infrastructure Group Ltd 8800 Dufferin Street, Suite 200 Vaughan ON CA L4K 0C5 t 905.738.5700 f 905.738.0065 www.tmig.ca this report has been formatted for double-sided printing Krosno Creek Flood Reduction Study CITY OF PICKERING _______________________________________________________________________________________ COMMUNICATIONS PLAN ▪ FEBRUARY 2015 Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................... 1 2 Mandatory Public Consultation under the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment .................... 2 2.1 Notice of Commencement ......................................... 2 2.2 PIC # 1 ...................................................................... 2 2.3 PIC # 2 ...................................................................... 3 2.4 Notice of Completion ................................................. 4 2.5 Tracking .................................................................... 4 3 Committee Meetings ............................................................ 5 3.1 Technical Committee ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Imagining Niagara: a Spatial Study of Economic Development (1783-1812)
    Re-imagining Niagara: A Spatial Study of Economic Development (1783-1812) by Jessica Linzel, B.A. Department of History Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Faculty of Humanities, Brock University St. Catharines, Ontario © 2020 Abstract The end of the American Revolution marked a turning point in the history of Niagara. In the span of three decades, this Upper Canadian district evolved as the territory of nomadic groups of Mississauga and Haudenosaunee nations into the post-war settlement of approximately 15,000 white, black, and British-allied Indigenous nations. Some arrived immediately as refugees of the late war, while other families came later in hopes of securing a brighter future. Historians generally discuss this period of Niagara’s history in terms of its socio-political developments, while economic histories of the “Loyalist Era” are most often assigned a broader lens focusing on trade and commerce in Upper Canada. To fill this historiographical gap, this paper investigates the economic developments within the Niagara region from 1783-1812, using geographic information systems (GIS) to analyze the role of geography alongside human agency in commodity production and the formation of local trade networks. This thesis includes an interactive webmap used to analyze a carefully compiled geospatial database of commodity sales gathered from primary sources. Historical GIS sets this project apart from others by bringing the investigations back to the land, showing how farmers and merchants responded to natural barriers like distance, wetlands, elevation and soil type, inciting individuals to adapt according to their personal circumstances. Ultimately, this project illustrates Niagara’s post-war transition from its role as a transshipment point in a larger transatlantic trade system into a productive agrarian economy by the early 19th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Brantford Asks Confederacy to Meet
    , LIBRARY ARCHIVES CANADA rchs Canada 1`.1c, oRINA,I,S IIIfflIi/»hI IIIIIII III IIII isi1III I II5002 to. t i r,ia 5002 7 Ìffee ......m Canada Archives 1 Library and Turtle Is anaß Collection North America's #1 Native Weekly Newspapi Newspaper Wellington ON 4 $1.39 395 K 1 A Okarahshona kenh Onkwehonwene, Six Nations of the Grant Ottawa, ON Reg No 10963-- ...viar2li:i. 4O01630y WEDNESDAY, ONERAHTOKKO:WA/MAY 11, 2011 WWW. theturtleislandnews.CUll_Pub'No ç Inside: -Brantford asks Confederacy to meet 2 r Moms get a on development PAGE treat ... PAGE 5 ri INAC red tape stops lit r education superintende hiring ... PAGE 4 e.-"_ r r. i SPORTS: Team Ontario takes . bronze ` K o . ... PAGE 9 Jr - t. r ford î tit ayor D...*CONTENTS Chris r . ` Local 2 Editorial 6 y with Onondaga Sports 8 I íthief Pete Skye Careers 18 Notices 19 OMá Classified 22 Business Directory 23 Saturday (Photo Price $1.25 I\ o by Lynn! ówless) (plus taxes where applicable) !R 01. , I .-r' r, J. --...legislU1t'ofti t)4J?:oj1o a 74470 04551 9 Ciou'd Çost $i( t4 ids ,iPAGE 2.. "° , ' - . 24 HOUR SURVEILLANCE WARNING take" you're not? vjateiniv3v,l Serving our community, t .. s ..-- a " I with over 30 Years Experience! ' t 4 Brad & Lorrie Hootun I Th BUSINESS HOME INDUSTRIAL Security System Services Systems 24 RI 1 C Burglar Alarms C Camera c Hour Monitoring NIiI11 11NI> c & more L t , : C Access Control C Fire & Sprinkler Monitoring 519.751.2255 www.owl-tech.ca 1.866.684.2226 x .
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous History and Treaty Lands in Dufferin County a Resource Guide
    Indigenous History and Treaty Lands in Dufferin County A Resource Guide For some Indigenous Peoples, Turtle Island refers to North America. It originates from oral histories that describe the land as having been created on the back of a giant turtle. The turtle is a symbol and icon for creation, life and truth for many Indigenous peoples. Artwork by: Chief Lady Bird (Nancy King), Rama First Nations/Moosedeer Point First Nations Version 1.5, 2020 Copyright: Museum of Dufferin, County of Dufferin Author: Julie A. McNevin, Education Programmer, Museum of Dufferin Table of Contents Land Acknowledgment & Explanation .........................1 Introduction.................................................................... 2 Important Terms ............................................................ 3 Land Treaties in Historical Context & Key Dates........... 4-6 Exploring & Interpreting Land Treaties ........................ 7 Tionontati (Petun) & Attawandaron (Neutral).............. 8-10 Haudenosaunee (Six Nations) ...................................... 11 The Haldimand Treaty ......................................... 12-13 Anishinaabe ................................................................... 14-15 Treaty 18: The Nottawasaga Purchase ............... 16 Treaty 19: The Ajetance Purchase .................... 17 Indigenous Peoples in Dufferin County Today ............. 18 Resources ...................................................................... 18-20 Did You Know? Feathers have important symbolic and spiritual significance to
    [Show full text]
  • The Grand River Haudenosaunee and Canada in Caledonia, Ontario
    WHAT’S AT STAKE ON (UN)COMMON GROUND? THE GRAND RIVER HAUDENOSAUNEE AND CANADA IN CALEDONIA, ONTARIO by LAURA ALICE DeVRIES B.Sc. (Hon), University of Ottawa, 2006 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Resource Management and Environmental Studies) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) July 2009 © Laura Alice DeVries, 2009 ABSTRACT Caledonia, Ontario made the news on February 28, 2006 as broadcasters reported on a strategically planned ‘occupation’ by Haudenosaunee protestors from the nearby Six Nations territory of a half‐finished forty‐hectare housing development known as Douglas Creek Estates. Negotiations over ownership of (and compensation for) Six Nations’ twenty‐ eight unaddressed land claims began shortly after the Ontario Provincial Police attempted and failed to remove the Six Nations occupiers, who assert that the land was not surrendered in the 1840s as Canada claims it was. The reclamation effort sparked tremendous controversy in Caledonia and across Canada; negotiations have achieved no resolution at the time of writing, and conflicts over land and resource rights are increasing in frequency and intensity both in Southern Ontario and across the continent. This thesis undertakes a discourse analysis of texts publicly circulated by the involved parties to discover the underpinnings of the dispute, to link it to histories of Haudenosaunee and Euro‐Canadian settler societies, and to generate insights regarding future Canadian‐ First Nations relationships. Competing claims to the land evidenced in these texts also constitute conflicting visions as to definitions of legitimacy, sovereignty, justice, citizenship and ‘normal’ society.
    [Show full text]
  • International Law/The Great Law of Peace
    INTERNATIONAL LAW/THE GREAT LAW OF PEACE A Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate Studies and Research in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for a Masters Degree in the College of Law University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon By Beverley Jacobs Spring 2000 © Copyright Beverley Jacobs, 2000 . All rights reserved. PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a graduate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the Libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis work or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which my thesis work was done . It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this thesis or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission . It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis . Requests for permission to copy or to make other use of material in this thesis in whole or part should be addressed to: Head of the College of Law University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5A6 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all, this thesis is dedicated to the Hodinohso :m Confederacy, including the Hodiyanehso, the clanmothers, the people, clans and families who have remained strong and true to our traditional way of life .
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 10: Consultation Record
    Environmental Assessment chapter 10. consultation record Table of Contents page 10. Consultation Record ............................................................................................................. 10-1 10.1 Environmental Assessment Consultation Activities and Results (June 2005 – August 2011) ...... 10-2 10.1.1 Public Consultation Activities and Results ........................................................................ 10-2 10.1.1.1 Notices ............................................................................................................ 10-2 10.1.1.2 Mailing Lists .................................................................................................... 10-3 10.1.1.3 Public Forums ................................................................................................. 10-3 10.1.1.4 Community Liaison Committee....................................................................... 10-8 10.1.1.5 Newsletters and Flyers ................................................................................. 10-11 10.1.1.6 Web-Based Information ................................................................................ 10-12 10.1.1.7 Community Workshops and Events ............................................................. 10-12 10.1.1.8 Lower Don Lands Planning Process Public Consultation ............................ 10-14 10.1.1.9 Other Public Feedback ................................................................................. 10-15 10.1.1.10 Summary of Public Issues and Responses
    [Show full text]
  • COUNCIL AGENDA – September 10, 2020 – Page 1 7
    COUNCIL AGENDA Thursday, September 10, 2020 at 2:00 p.m. By video conference – The meeting will be live streamed on YouTube at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCx9vXkywflJr0LUVkKnYWQ 1. ROLL CALL Verbal roll call by the Clerk. 2. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA THAT the Agenda and any Addendum distributed for the September 10, 2020 meeting of Council, be approved. 3. DECLARATION OF INTEREST BY MEMBERS Members of Council are required to state any pecuniary interest in accordance with the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE PREVIOUS MEETING THAT the minutes of the regular meeting of Council of August 27, 2020, be adopted. 5. PROCLAMATIONS, DELEGATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS 5.1. Delegation: Orangeville Foodbank A delegation from Heather Hayes, Executive Direction, Orangeville Foodbank, to update Council on the Orangeville Food Bank activities. 6. PUBLIC QUESTION PERIOD Questions can be submitted to [email protected] or 519-941-2816 x2500 prior to 1:00 p.m. on August 27, 2020. COUNCIL AGENDA – September 10, 2020 – Page 1 7. PRESENTATION AND CONSIDERATIONS OF REPORTS General Government Services – Chair Creelman 7.1. Clerk/Director of Corporate Services’ Report – Building By-Law 2020-14 Amendment (Residential Garages) A report from the Clerk/Director of Corporate Services, dated September 10, 2020, to recommend amending the current Building By-Law 2020-14 to clarify the permit fee pricing for attached residential garages. THAT the report from the Clerk/Director of Corporate Services, dated September 10, 2020, with respect to Building By-Law 2020-14 Amendment (Residential Garages), be received; AND THAT Building By-Law 2020-14 be amended to apply the same fee of $3.44 per/m2 for both detached and attached residential garages.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019Powwowguide.Pdf
    B:9.5” T:8.5” B:12” T:11” Simply worth celebrating Enjoy a seamless stay at Delta Hotels by Marriott Sault Ste. For reservations, call 888.236.2427 Marie Waterfront. or visit Marriott.com/YAMDS. Located in the heart of Sault Ste. Marie, take in life’s simple Delta Hotels by Marriott® pleasures from the city’s only hotel offering genuine waterfront Sault Ste. Marie Waterfront views. Our welcoming guest rooms are furnished with the bare 208 St. Mary’s River Drive maximum—ultra-comfortable beds, clean, stylish showers with Sault Ste. Marie P6A 5V4 just the right pressure and spacious work areas. Choose from Canada 13 versatile meeting and event spaces with state-of-the-art 70 5.9 4 9.0 611 equipment or host your social event on the seasonal outdoor patio to meet up, wind down or just to enjoy a casual bite. Celebrate the simple made perfect with Delta Hotels. DeltaHotels DeltaHotels DeltaHotelsLTD © 2018 Marriott International, Inc. All rights reserved. 1013875 File Name: 1013875_5203_DLT_GreatLakesGuide_FP_8.5inWx11inH_v3.1.indd Option: QC/QA Client: Marriott Field Marketing Media:Magazine Publication: MFM Marsha #: YAMDS-2018-CCOE Links: Fonts: Inks: Account Mgr DE_YAMDS_Exterior_SWOP.tif (CMYK; 914 ppi; Lettera Pro (Regular) Cyan Title: DLT_GreatLakesGuide_FP_8.5inWx11inH 32.8%; 173.2MB) Basic Commercial LT Com Magenta Studio Artist YAMDS_Logo_DH_white_cmyk.eps (21.15%; 2.0MB) (Light, Bold, Roman) Yellow Black Q.C. Trim: 8.5” x 11” Client Bleed: 0.5” x 0.5” Safety: 0” x 0” Artist: Lania Yu / Michael Liebergot ICC: SWOP2006_Coated3v2.icc Station: OMG-USNY-OSX-008 / Lania Yu Saved: 4-16-2018 10:53 AM Workflow: CMYK Current: 4-16-2018 10:53 AM Message from Grand Council Chief Aaniin, pride and belonging” – we are all on her legacy.
    [Show full text]
  • CULTURAL HERITAGE EVALUATION and CULTURAL HERITAGE ASSESSMENT 32 BRIDGE STREET CITY of BRANTFORD Prepared For: Andrew Neill Construction
    CULTURAL HERITAGE EVALUATION AND CULTURAL HERITAGE ASSESSMENT 32 BRIDGE STREET CITY OF BRANTFORD Prepared for: Andrew Neill Construction Prepared by: Scarlett Janusas Archaeology Inc. Main Office: 269 Cameron Lake Road, Tobermory, Ontario N0H 2R0 Branch: 1166 2nd Avenue W., Owen Sound, Ontario N4K 2N2 Main Office Phone: 519-596-8243 / Cell: 519-374-1119 email: [email protected] website: www.actionarchaeology.ca February 27, 2020 Revised July 30, 2020 © TABLE OF CONTENTS Project Personnel v Executive Summary vi 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Project Description 1 1.2 Credentials 1 1.3 Purpose/Objectives 5 2.0 PHYSICAL CONTEXT 8 2.1 Existing Land Use 8 2.2 Provincial Interests in Planning for Cultural Heritage 8 2.3 Provincial Policy Statement 9 2.4 City of Brantford Official Plan 10 2.5 Local Committees and Resources 12 3.0 HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT 17 3.1 Location and Environment 17 3.2 Cemeteries 17 3.3 Historical Settlement and Development 17 3.4 Summary of Archaeological Assessments 35 4.0 IDENTIFICATION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE LANDSCAPES AND BUILT HERITAGE RESOURCES 41 4.1 Methodology 41 4.2 Summary of Survey Findings 41 4.3 Cultural Landscapes 41 4.3.1 Roadscapes 42 4.3.2 Cemeteries 42 4.4 Built Resources 42 4.4.1 1 Darling Street 49 4.4.2 3 Darling Street 49 4.4.3 5 Darling Street 50 4.4.4 15 Darling Street 52 4.4.5 16-24 Darling Street 52 4.4.6 11 West Street 54 4.4.7 27 Bridge Street 54 4.4.8 32 Bridge Street (the Study Area) 55 4.4.9 6 Dalhousie 56 4.4.10 7 Darling Street 58 4.4.11 14 Dalhousie Street 58 4.4.12 20 Dalhousie 59 4.5 Commemorative
    [Show full text]
  • Brant's Ford, Was a “Whiteman Reserve”
    2/6/2020 Brant’s Ford, was a “whiteman reserve” Brant’s Ford, was a “whiteman reserve” December 26, 2018 Jim Windle Six Nations Haldimand Tract lands were being gobbled up at an alarming pace following the death of Joseph Brant on Nov. 7th of 1807. It had begun long before that, with the 1793, Simcoe Patent when 230,000 acres of the decreed Haldimand Tract, six miles on either side of the Grand River from source to mouth, Six Nations Haldimand Tract lands were being gobbled up at an alarming pace following the death of Joseph Brant on Nov. 7th of 1807. It had begun long before that, with the 1793, Simcoe Patent when 230,000 acres of the decreed Haldimand Tract, six miles on either side of the Grand River from source to mouth, as the proclamation stated. Following Brant’s death and after countless petitions put forth by the Confederacy Chiefs to order non-Native squatters off their land, William Hepburn made steps to correct this growing problem and ordered that anyone with a purported Brant Lease should gather their lease agreements and supporting papers to prove it in fact was a Brant Lease or a fraud. Some leases produced were dated after Joseph Brant’s death, and still others were not presented at all. In fact, out of 172 claims of having a Brant Lease, only nine could actually produce any supporting documentation. Two more calls to squatters for proof of their alleged Brant Leases went out from Hepburn’s office in the form of posters nailed to trees and post offices and general stores throughout the area.
    [Show full text]